@JapanYoshiTheGamer yes, search for "4x4x4" on the ARMflix channel. You may also be interested in the 7x7x7 solver, "MultiCuber 777" and even a Megaminx solver "Android Megaminxer" ;-)
@Davide25084 yes, the difference is that CubeStormer II combines the software from the Android Speedcuber (the successor of this robot) with the mechanical design from CubeStormer (original) ;-)
@adliikhwan280 - the key difference is that this yellow one solves a 3x3x3 Rubik's Cube and the similar black one can solve a 4x4x4 Rubik's Cube as it has different software and a slightly different mechanism that allows it to turn two different layers rather than just one. Are you aware of the yellow "Android Speedcuber" that can solve a 3x3x3 cube much faster than this robot (in around 15 seconds rather than 3 or so minutes) and the black "MultiCuber 777" that can solve a 7x7x7 cube? ;-)
@Djsora555 - you're right that the cube does appear to solved in roughly the same order as the Lars Petrus method. However, it is a different algorithm that I designed and optimised specifically for implementation in software that can determine solutions with far fewer moves than the "human-friendly" algorithms
@difer1999 - thanks for asking about F2L. The algorithms used by this and my other robots are only partially based on the way people solve the puzzle. The early algorithm I developed for this robot effectively solves both the initial cross and the rest of the first two layers simultaneously resulting in a solution typically of around 32 moves. The most recent "Android Speedcuber" uses a more sophisticated algorithm that results in even shorter solutions.
@TRUFFLIEPUFFF - it's a Nokia N95 mobile phone with a built in camera that is used to take pictures of the cube. An application running on the phone analyses the pictures and using this information works out how to solve the puzzle. It then sends commands via Bluetooth to the LEGO Mindstorms NXT to control the motors to actually solve the cube
amazing!! I have considered making something to of this sort but haven't put the time into it. Nice work!! (just wondering how many hours you spend on it??!!)
@ClimberJeffrey You should try - I bet it would be great fun! BTW have you seen the latest LEGO "Speedcuber" video that ARMflix uploaded yesterday? It's worth a look and probably took even more hours to create!?!? :-)
Yes, fun isn't it! And have you seen the one that can solve a 4x4x4 Rubik's cube too? I've favourited quite a few cool ones on my channel (click on my name above this comment)
This process may be a little unreliable, for example if the lighting
conditions change between images, so the program always checks that the final result is a valid position before attempting to solve it. If the position is not valid, it currently just assumes that there was an error in determining the colours from the images and starts again. In the case you describe it would simply keep re-scanning the cube indefinitely.
The Rubik's cube is taking about 40 seconds in the video to solve, but this is speeded up - what's the total time and how much faster can this go? What are the limiting factors - is it the lego motor torque?... In terms of calculating the solution, would a PC be faster than a phone?
At normal speed, the total time including the N95 taking the pictures and working out the solution and then the NXT physically manipulating the puzzle is about 4 minutes. There are a number of factors affecting the overall time. The N95 takes a few seconds to capture each picture and return it to the Java application. As you suggested, the mechanical speed is limited mainly by the torque of the motors, particularly when lifting the cube to tilt it.
The total time is obviously affected by the number of moves in the solution. The algorithm that is used to find a solution will find shorter sequences of moves the longer it is given. In this demonstration the N95 is given 2 seconds of real time time to determine a good solution. The average solution found by the N95 in 2 seconds is about 30 moves (the one in the video happened to be 31).
The original algorithm was developed in C++ on a PC, and given the same processing time of 2 seconds, a PC running native code rather than Java typically finds a solution of around 25 moves. Of course the PC is using significantly more electrical energy to do this than the N95.
@ARMflix The algorithm will go download it, or it is a copyrighted work. using this algorithm could be a buddy program for the 5x5x5 cube solver. I think the webpage Wrongway.org I personally do not know to solve Rubik's cube. I often use programs that shows how solutions. Not that I'm humble mind and not solve the Rubik's cube.
@ARMflix The algorithm will go download it, or it is a copyrighted work. using this algorithm could be a buddy program for the 5x5x5 cube solver. I think the webpage Wrongway.org I personally do not know to solve Rubik's cube. I often use programs that shows how solutions. Not that I'm humble mind and not solve the Rubik's cube.
@ms5stacc - you asked about the speed of calculating a solution for the cube... have you seen the latest ARM Powered Android Speedcuber video demonstrating a 15 second solve of about 20 moves using an HTC Nexus One smartphone? ;-)
This has been flagged as spam show
Yes, we are giving away iphone4, get yours before it's too late! rl0 27go.info
rossieigoxiej49k 1 week ago 22
Make it throw the cube right after it finishes. ;)
Navshod 2 weeks ago
whered you get that?
jj1x0 2 weeks ago
Do you have a Rubik's Revenge(4*4*4) machine?
JapanYoshiTheGamer 1 month ago
@JapanYoshiTheGamer yes, search for "4x4x4" on the ARMflix channel. You may also be interested in the 7x7x7 solver, "MultiCuber 777" and even a Megaminx solver "Android Megaminxer" ;-)
IAssemble 1 month ago
The question is : Will it blend ?
MateusGianetti 3 months ago
impressive
monsieurhassan 4 months ago
Watch Cubestormer II Video..
See The Difference?
Davide25084 4 months ago
@Davide25084 yes, the difference is that CubeStormer II combines the software from the Android Speedcuber (the successor of this robot) with the mechanical design from CubeStormer (original) ;-)
IAssemble 4 months ago
A.R.M. = Amazing Robotic Machine
UrbanSportGuy 5 months ago
@UrbanSportGuy thanks. Have you seen CubeStormer II? :D
IAssemble 4 months ago
That's fucking awesome
lukeskywalkin 7 months ago
Told ya! They are gonna take over the world one day!
ZiaUrRehmanFarooqi 7 months ago
Fucking genius!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
0GhostH0 7 months ago
This is Advanced Lego Construction .. 16yo+ :D
65465468 7 months ago 5
can it use a ipod 4g too?
MMinecrafTT 7 months ago
Epic lego machine, is epic!
L4st2kn0w 8 months ago
this is a device that an asian person did not invent
christina8000 8 months ago
That is awesome.
LegoAidanStudios 9 months ago
Thanks for the idea!GOnna try it since my mum has the phone :)
mobradovic00 9 months ago
Do You Mind Sending That To My House?
TheZaneRavenz 9 months ago
wtf?
ItIsAmyy 10 months ago
now that's an idea... I wonder if a robot could be created to solve the Rubik's 360 or number ball?!? ;-)
IAssemble 11 months ago
I can solve a rubik's cube 3x3x3, 4x4x4, 5x5x5, 360 and the number ball in 28 minutes without a robot. :D
RichardXV250 11 months ago
it might be more impressive, when you can solve a rubik's cube, not when you own a robot that can do it
Skitzo520 1 year ago
@Skitzo520 - does it depend on whether you just own the robot or whether you designed it? ;-)
IAssemble 1 year ago
Whats the difference between the yellow and the black one?
adliikhwan280 1 year ago
@adliikhwan280 - the key difference is that this yellow one solves a 3x3x3 Rubik's Cube and the similar black one can solve a 4x4x4 Rubik's Cube as it has different software and a slightly different mechanism that allows it to turn two different layers rather than just one. Are you aware of the yellow "Android Speedcuber" that can solve a 3x3x3 cube much faster than this robot (in around 15 seconds rather than 3 or so minutes) and the black "MultiCuber 777" that can solve a 7x7x7 cube? ;-)
IAssemble 1 year ago
nice
TheSiggi1997 1 year ago
mind blowing!!! :)
shruv 1 year ago
but will it blend?
Zonedude01 1 year ago
1 person doesn't have a cube solving robot
buzz798 1 year ago
dude, if you could send me the designs, i wouldnt have to solve it for her whenever she messes it up.
RBeanland 1 year ago
the computer use lars petrus method.
Djsora555 1 year ago
@Djsora555 - you're right that the cube does appear to solved in roughly the same order as the Lars Petrus method. However, it is a different algorithm that I designed and optimised specifically for implementation in software that can determine solutions with far fewer moves than the "human-friendly" algorithms
IAssemble 1 year ago
@IAssemble Hey Cubefriend. Have you heard? Feliks Zemdegs the world champion use a other Method. He use "Zeroing". He will make a tutorial soon.
You can go with it under 5 seconds. Really. But it is so complex uff i need more time to learn it.
Djsora555 1 year ago
@Djsora555 - yes, Feliks did an amazing solve didn't he! :-)
IAssemble 1 year ago
MOST KICK ASS THING EVAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!
nintendKS 1 year ago
ok thats FUCKING awesome
MYcareLEVELis1 1 year ago
with or without F2L
difer1999 1 year ago
@difer1999 - thanks for asking about F2L. The algorithms used by this and my other robots are only partially based on the way people solve the puzzle. The early algorithm I developed for this robot effectively solves both the initial cross and the rest of the first two layers simultaneously resulting in a solution typically of around 32 moves. The most recent "Android Speedcuber" uses a more sophisticated algorithm that results in even shorter solutions.
IAssemble 1 year ago
The only thing better than this is if money,beer,and laptops fell out of the sky.
zeldafanful 1 year ago
wow i need that
LegoGladiater 1 year ago
i need one so badly !!
shadowlayer2 1 year ago
WOW !!!
gringo4e 1 year ago
O...M...G...ಠ_ಠ
laulauhhh 1 year ago
Instructions on how to build, pretty please.
ChaoMystero 1 year ago
Comment removed
aschmidt100 1 year ago
@aschmidt100 it is
tompp321 1 year ago
=O!!!
2545346 1 year ago
so basically, the camera is just a webcam?
TRUFFLIEPUFFF 1 year ago
@TRUFFLIEPUFFF - it's a Nokia N95 mobile phone with a built in camera that is used to take pictures of the cube. An application running on the phone analyses the pictures and using this information works out how to solve the puzzle. It then sends commands via Bluetooth to the LEGO Mindstorms NXT to control the motors to actually solve the cube
IAssemble 1 year ago
Comment removed
TRUFFLIEPUFFF 1 year ago
oO That's insane!
Stephaaanx 1 year ago
OMFG THAT IS INSANE!
5*
PivotMan255 1 year ago
this mindstorms stuff is amazing
Legofan78 2 years ago 11
omg i cant belevie my eyes
akawerewolfking 2 years ago
yo lo hago en 10s el cubo
guantay07 2 years ago
amazing!! I have considered making something to of this sort but haven't put the time into it. Nice work!! (just wondering how many hours you spend on it??!!)
ClimberJeffrey 2 years ago
@ClimberJeffrey You should try - I bet it would be great fun! BTW have you seen the latest LEGO "Speedcuber" video that ARMflix uploaded yesterday? It's worth a look and probably took even more hours to create!?!? :-)
IAssemble 2 years ago
does only n95 can do that, or you can use another phone
zeyeerboost 2 years ago
How does it connect? Bluetooth?
mustango656 2 years ago
O.o! WOW!
saronicle 2 years ago
O_O PWNAGE
therocker100 2 years ago
incredible
ad2add 2 years ago
Awesome work bored guy :P
TheCabalGamer 2 years ago
sweet
Sam5Max 2 years ago
I use to have one of those. I wish I'd have known they could do this type of stuff then.
cheesycheesenugget 2 years ago
Yes, fun isn't it! And have you seen the one that can solve a 4x4x4 Rubik's cube too? I've favourited quite a few cool ones on my channel (click on my name above this comment)
IAssemble 2 years ago
jeesh
cool
justmarinus 2 years ago
epic.
macsucks45 2 years ago
cool
Tommlkjp 2 years ago
Omg that was so fucking pro!!!
kwikster25 2 years ago
i could do one in like 30-40 sec buy just wathcing a invention do it is just amazing!!!
hypermonkey3 2 years ago
thats bad ass!!!!!
trashman203 2 years ago
that is freakin' wicked!
l3g0mast3r 2 years ago
that is freakin sick. make more sumthing like that to solve the rubik's twist
Marax14 2 years ago
is that real?
the12221 2 years ago
@the12221 - yes
dennussie11 2 years ago
@dennussie11 that is awesome :)!!
the12221 2 years ago
holy fukin shit thats amazingg. now theses guy scrambled it and the robot solved it. not like that other guy who only scrambles it like with 5 moves
dslmmlibrizzi 2 years ago
i swaer to god i will buy that for 3,000 dollars in the nearby future
dreadmaster87 2 years ago
=O I want one
b1e8a2n0 2 years ago
holy fuck this is awesome
arrrgh22 2 years ago 2
What would happen if you were to spin a corner or flip an edge would it recognise it as parity and just not solve it.
UKSpeedCuber 2 years ago 17
Thanks for the question. After taking a picture of each face, the program analyses the colours to
determine the cube position.
ARMflix 2 years ago
This process may be a little unreliable, for example if the lighting
conditions change between images, so the program always checks that the final result is a valid position before attempting to solve it. If the position is not valid, it currently just assumes that there was an error in determining the colours from the images and starts again. In the case you describe it would simply keep re-scanning the cube indefinitely.
ARMflix 2 years ago
Perhaps it could be modified to recognise the edge flip or corner spin cases explicitly and warn the user that the cube needed to be fixed!
ARMflix 2 years ago
Haha, that would be cool. Even before it starts solving. It just says ERROR!
This video is 'freakin cool though!
Another 5* and Favourite.
UKSpeedCuber 2 years ago
hmm...
ben1996123 2 years ago
very good
fabber1992 2 years ago
Genius! Genial! Im so impressed 5/5!!!!
TNSthetormentor 2 years ago
holy sh*t!! :D
scareface999 2 years ago
ARM really are amazing!!!!!
Alpheyt 2 years ago
cool
gsf422 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
is this really real
monstercameron 2 years ago
amazine!!! So cool!
iloveFLL 3 years ago
The Rubik's cube is taking about 40 seconds in the video to solve, but this is speeded up - what's the total time and how much faster can this go? What are the limiting factors - is it the lego motor torque?... In terms of calculating the solution, would a PC be faster than a phone?
ms5stacc 3 years ago
Its in the description...
Britbadger 3 years ago
At normal speed, the total time including the N95 taking the pictures and working out the solution and then the NXT physically manipulating the puzzle is about 4 minutes. There are a number of factors affecting the overall time. The N95 takes a few seconds to capture each picture and return it to the Java application. As you suggested, the mechanical speed is limited mainly by the torque of the motors, particularly when lifting the cube to tilt it.
ARMflix 3 years ago
The total time is obviously affected by the number of moves in the solution. The algorithm that is used to find a solution will find shorter sequences of moves the longer it is given. In this demonstration the N95 is given 2 seconds of real time time to determine a good solution. The average solution found by the N95 in 2 seconds is about 30 moves (the one in the video happened to be 31).
ARMflix 3 years ago
The original algorithm was developed in C++ on a PC, and given the same processing time of 2 seconds, a PC running native code rather than Java typically finds a solution of around 25 moves. Of course the PC is using significantly more electrical energy to do this than the N95.
ARMflix 3 years ago
@ARMflix The algorithm will go download it, or it is a copyrighted work. using this algorithm could be a buddy program for the 5x5x5 cube solver. I think the webpage Wrongway.org I personally do not know to solve Rubik's cube. I often use programs that shows how solutions. Not that I'm humble mind and not solve the Rubik's cube.
SEMJASE7777 1 year ago
@ARMflix The algorithm will go download it, or it is a copyrighted work. using this algorithm could be a buddy program for the 5x5x5 cube solver. I think the webpage Wrongway.org I personally do not know to solve Rubik's cube. I often use programs that shows how solutions. Not that I'm humble mind and not solve the Rubik's cube.
SEMJASE7777 1 year ago
@ARMflix now in english
jobosbaeten 1 year ago
@ms5stacc - you asked about the speed of calculating a solution for the cube... have you seen the latest ARM Powered Android Speedcuber video demonstrating a 15 second solve of about 20 moves using an HTC Nexus One smartphone? ;-)
IAssemble 1 year ago
Cool!
chanphillip 3 years ago
awesome job
tom220289 3 years ago
Very cool!
cachetgal 3 years ago