Added: 4 years ago
From: neseliadam
Views: 56,394
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (94)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • BTW, who planted the bomb? I know which faction but which actual person killed all 900 people?

  • This video about my music. Not about movie. Read the descrtiption, than write comments pls.

  • Nah...Hollywood sucks.

  • This was such a great movie...one of the few that had me captivated when I was at the theater.

  • who the fuck would ever want to nuke baltimore.... you would be doing the USA a favor

  • @101andrewj > That is not funny at all.

  • @rfgstl watch the wire.... you see what im talking about

  • @rfgstl

    Why not? I had a nice little LOL as a result of reading that comment.

  • Hello friends. I'm late 1 year, but i'll answer your questions about music.

    I'm using only symphonic instruments, no synth. And this is my music. The orijinal movie had no music at all during this scene, you right. So i made it :)

  • @neseliadam

    Music > *

    Nuff said.

  • the U.S. would strike with precision the Russians will strike with brute force.

  • @slapking12

    So true...

  • Nice job with music.5/5

  • The doctors at the begining didnt get as much damage as the presidents convoy and chopper

  • Comment removed

  • Not bad. Which model of synth did you use for this ?

  • What's with music in the background? The original movie had no music at all during this scene.

  • 0:06 look at the TV

  • o yeah sweet thats cool....

  • never noticed that before, what a well thought out touch of realism

  • @datsyuk134life U got that right~~!

  • @datsyuk134life

    What about it? The signal was lost proally cause the tv was commin from somewhere closer to the explosion. Also consider this, it might have been an effect of the EMP effect. Food for thought.

  • what a nice movie!!

  • the cum of all queers

  • looks really animated duering some parts of this

  • i think it also is, they really cant use a real bomb!!

  • They can and have used footage from nuclear bomb test sites.

  • Many of the characters in this film are shown to have no radiation sickness whatsoever in the final scenes.

  • Well haven't you heard of the new Nuclear Bomb? Now with 97% less radiation! It's suppose to be really good

  • THATS WHAT SHE SAID

  • A radioactive dick?

  • @lekkimsm2500 Sure makes wiping out different cultures more easier. Cant endanger your own.. Do they have any oil?

  • @lekkimsm2500 are you mad how can a nuclear bomb be any good, its a madmans weapon used only in pure desperation, nuclear bombs should have never been made in the first place, its insane

  • @Blasti1987

    You have completely missed that sarcasm in my comments... And if you would have read the first one i made to this, you would see what i mean about this as well

  • @lekkimsm2500 i fail to see sarcasm sometimes, specially on this kind of shit :P

  • Comment removed

  • @101andrewj yeah it was made originally for energy at the first place but ofcourse people had to develop more -.-

  • @Blasti1987 there are plenty of good uses for nuclear technology.... its mans constant need for violence that is the problem

  • @lekkimsm2500

    And I want one of those so fucking bad. No wait, its a nuclear fucking bomb - radiation should be included at no additional cost, its a beautiful thing when used as an offensive weapon.

  • @lekkimsm2500 Really good? You scare me pal. Nothing good about a nuclear bomb, it's only cool in video games, but in real life, it's more than scary.

  • @pspboy7 it was a VERY sarcastic remark ... nobody likes nuclear bombs

  • @lekkimsm2500 I like nuclear bombs...

  • great movie

  • I think it's disgusting that humanity has come to this with the possible itention to use nuclear weapons. They should be all rid from the world.

  • that terrifying how we still allow weapons like this to exist.

  • i know!

  • yeh nuclear weapons have been tested all over this planet hundreds of times, and we're still here, although cancer and other problems will follow

  • hundreds of time huh .? may suggest you do some fact checking

  • More like maybe...say 10? 15 maybe/

  • btw neseliadam you really ruined this scene with this music

  • why an atomic bomb called "atomic" when kills thousands??

  • That was a great render. I love Tom Clancy movies, too lazy to read the big books.

  • God this movie sucked so bad. I liked the game so much better even though it had nothing to do with the movie really.

  • I don't think 16-17 Nukes would destroy earth.

    I don't want to over simplify it but as far as I get it its about:

    Atomic Bomb = 10000x a hand grenade

    Meteor Impact = 10000x an atomic Bomb

    Note: US and Soviets had ten thousands of nuclear warheads in cold war.

  • But I'm hungry... I think I'm gonna have some Smoked Salmon with a little smoked Gouda on the side, and finish it off with a nice pipe!!

  • Did the Dinosaur cities catch on fire?

  • smoke = cancer?

  • Would you please upload the whole scene of the atack, please? Thanks.

  • The surviors all died from radiation

  • hey dacity202.....mortalkombattril­ogy 1 is right,why dont u just go fur self and leave asshole,if your gonna be calling us gay then,shushhhh,get the fuck out of here then

  • ur dumb bitch,go f ur self asshole

  • At one time. Go back to school and learn it. If you blow up 17 nukes at one spot or near each other, it'll create a big mushroom cloud.

  • Usually ift here was 16 to 17 nukes,the Shockwaves would already kill all the people and wipe out everything in a long range,so nothing would be leaft in the earth,some people may live if they are above ground,but still,pressure of the shockwave blows everything out of its way,so yea

  • that whas a nuclear bomb

  • yep

  • If we had a nuclear war, everyone would end up dead. We all know that. Just 16-17 nukes would destroy our planet. Why? It causes a giant mushroom cloud big enough to cover the Earth from the sun, create massive heat, bacteria will die without the sun, then organisms and people will die from the massive radiation.

  • 16-17 nukes is far from enough to end life on earth, there were done hundreds of nuclear tests in the cold war.

  • If you blow it up all at once near each other. It'll create a big enough mushroom cloud to kill us all, starting from very important bacteria.

  • Most nukes are about 1 Megaton.

    In 1961 the russians tested a 57 Megaton nuclear warhead. even if we detonated 16, 57 megaton nukes, it would be about 900 Megatons.

    That is alot, and it will cause a lot of damage to the planet, but End of the world? No.

  • I don't know where you're getting your facts from undertake. Even 17 of the largest nuclear explosions wouldn't come close to throwing enough debris into the atmosphere to block out the sun.

    You can't apply such a specific number to a weapon with such wide ranging sizes. Most nukes these days are tactical weapons, only designed to destroy a military base or a city center.

  • Not if the Mole People do it.

  • wsmith68 is spot on, the Plutonium core taken from the Israeli nuclear bomb was degraded and corroded, not to mention would stand more of a chance of fizzling out rather than reaching critical mass, unless the yield was substantially scaled down.

  • Yes, mankind got lucky. Fissile U is hard to get, but bomb is very easy, Pu is hard to make a bomb from, but relatively easy to get.

    I wonder about the origin of Israel's first cores. They had had a reactor complex, money, technical know-how and unchallenged willpower for enough time before the six-days war. Doesn't seem like they would need USA product. USA may have done it in return for assurances that Israel would not produce Pu. It seems very likely any such promise was broken.

  • I don't think we will ever know anything about any country with nuclear weapons (Including the US) outside the unclassified reports and information given to the public.

  • "Pu is hard to make a bomb from"

    in fact, it's not too difficult. The easiest design would be 2 eplosive shaped charge lenses with a hollow ball of Pu 239.

    Weaker than the "football design", but still enough to ignite a deuterium fusion.

  • ...But still hard to make without proper (and expensive) tools, eg. centrifuge.

  • Much harder than you think. With chemically separated Pu from old fuel the rate of change of criticality has to be enormous to prevent a "fizzle". I think N Korea learned that with their 0.5kt experiment. If you are inexperienced like America in 1944-45, then you need spherical--the most efficient and requires intense understanding of high explosive lens operation. You can only get that with either experiment or hard espionage. Then you need a team of PhDs to interpret. Thank God for that!

  • Since it was detonated in M&T Bank Stadium, how far would the bomb's effects go?

  • 50 KT = 100% destruction for roughly up to 40 miles radially from ground zero. Fire balling up to 70 miles from ground zero. A big enough bomb and level an entire state.

  • That's 50 MT not 50KT. 50 KT is about 2X Hiroshima (think 1-2 mi radius).

  • I knew it sounded wrong when I wrote it.. the specs on the Tsar Bomba were that the blast radius was roughly 40 miles; my bad.

  • u realize the Tsar Bomba was a 50MT bomb made to approximately test the effects of the 100MT device the Russians had produced...

    just fucking think about how huge that is?!?!?!

  • If its on the ground it always does less damage than in the air. Max damage would be a function of the anticipated yield and an appropriate height based on that yield.

  • I was a low-yield improvised nuke. Despite the use of nuke-designers, the Pu was from 1967-not fresh. Using material that old, a bomb has to be "tuned" way down for stability.

  • 13ig12eaper, the largest nuke made was in 1961, so saying it was from the 70's means nothin.

  • LOL, I love how the tail breaks off the helicopter completely, then in the next shot, it's still mostly there. Also, the blast should have been way bigger. Good music, though.

  • not completely broken off. its still the same. first shot and the second shot. get a life.

  • No, if you pause the vid at 15 seconds exactly you will see the tail is broken, BUT at 19 seconds you will see it almost a complete tail WTF!

    Error in the movie XD XD !!!

  • it was okay, but it didnt even come close to showing the reall power of one of those nukes

  • its a crappy low yield nuke from the 70s

    a bigger bomb wasnt available heh

  • fantastic explosion I like it

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more