Added: 4 years ago
From: variablestatus
Views: 406,239
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (156)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • If you want to get the plans for building a Free Energy Magnetic Generator

    Just goto Google, search for "Top Magnetic Generator" and click the first result

    I found it to be a great resource

  • Comment removed

  • @70pda .... it's a scam.

  • @ian5576 Hi Ian, you are replying to a 2 year old comment of mine. I agree with you

  • TO THOSE WHO SAY PERPETUAL MOTION MAGNET MOTORS ARE FAKE: Following the laws of thermodynamics, get a clue, you ARE using energy to obtain the energy, you are using the depletable resource in the magnets, magnetic force. The magnets don't last forever. (newbs)

  • @therogerwilco - ah the words of a true dill. For a start no magnetic motor spins under its own power so the idea they contain usable energy is not only unproven it is laughable. You should not have slept through Physics 101 classes should you?

  • Comment removed

  • @therogerwilco - I never said magnets don't "wear out". The magnetism in a magnet can be destroyed over time by excess heat, strong magnetic forces and rough handling.

    "Magnetic force" is real but you but you miss one important fact. The force produced by two magnets repelling is equal to the force to bring them together. Therefore no net gain no matter how they are configured in a magnetic motor.

    You may not have slept through your Physics 101 classes, but you weren't listening...

  • @ZoeMarks And you are missing the point, the magnets come together and are balanced enough to spin something, that's all. Again, the 'net gain' as you put it is not calculated from the magnets repelling or attracting, it's from the axial rotation, being spun, by the magnets. If you say that equates to zero energy because all the magnets are the same, I'm not sure what to tell you... Gravity, magnetic degradation, and friction would be the variables. Make sense? I see the confusion...I'm listenin

  • @therogerwilco - I can't see whether you now agree or disagree that magnetic motors can never work. If you spin a magnetic motor by hand up to speed it will only ever slow down. Friction from the bearings, air resistance and eddy current losses will slow it to a stop. The magnets add nothing at all to promote or sustain rotation as they have a net zero effect. As gravity acts equally on both sides of an axis it contributes nothing to the overall rotation.

  • @therogerwilco - "net gain" has nothing to do with the axial rotation at all. Remove the magnets from a magnetic motor & the shaft spinning is not a source of power. If the magnets produce torque for the whole 360 degree rotation of the shaft then there would be a net power output.

    Power = torque x speed (rpm) so no net torque = no power.

    Make a magnetic motor and slowly rotate the shaft by hand & you'll see the force required to rotate is a series of positive and negative forces (torque).

  • @ZoeMarks you are obviously stuck in your ways and cannot understand what possibilities there are for this. if you use a coil setup somehow to capture the magnetism from the magnets on the spinning center, whatever, you can then create current. none of this has anything to do with the magnets being the same (perhaps they're not!) and none of this has anything to do with your understanding, you're missing the simple premise displayed here. An easy way to sping something, for the life of a magnet

  • @therogerwilco "you're missing the simple premise displayed here"

    I think you are the one missing the 'simple premise':

    you are an idiot

    If it is so easy to recreate a WORKING version of this piece of garbage then build one;

    I won't bother holding my breath...

  • Comment removed

  • @therogerwilco - read my previous posts. I clearly said "I never said magnets don't 'wear out'". Magnets do produce a force and why does that imply that this force will then power a magnetic motor? Hold two magnets apart by say 6 inches and they will attract each other with a force, bring them together and the force is expended.  Now ask yourself what force is required to move them apart 6 inches? Exactly the same force that pulled them together. No net gain.

  • thats a bit unusual to see good results with magnets, thats awesome, well done :)

  • why not put that to use and generate energy for free?

  • its a very nice system anyway ;)

  • ENERGY IS VIBRATION.

    RESONANT HARMONICS.

  • It's reducing!

  • if it slows down it doesn't work to give you free energy with the vidio almost over click back to near the beginning, it should be obvious that the "motor" has slowed down.

  • Do you really think you will get unity just by placing it in a vacuum?LOL.

    Vacuum does not eliminate gravity,and when you apply the coils needed to generate electricity you will find that once the system is loaded it will stop spinning very quickly.

    Sorry to burst your bubble but you're better off designing a wind turbine;water wheel;or some other device to collect natural energy.There is no FREE.

  • @HiFiman4u look up zero point energy

  • @thinkstrait I've known about zero point energy long before you were born.

    Look up Nikola Tesla if you want to learn something about energy.

    Here is a riddle for you 3-6-9 /1-2-3 Do you get it?

    I didn't think so.

    Go play with some mentos and coke.

  • @HiFiman4u wow, im flattered that you went to my profile and watched my video the whole way through :) thanks for making the hit counter go up, although I am a bit worried that you look at kids now.. but nonetheless that video is about 8 years old. Just by the reaction you gave me from a simple suggestion that there is theoretically limitless energy and you say there is none, i can assume that you don't really know anything about tesla and quantum theory and probably googled all your knowledge

  • Nice flywheels

  • hello .. ineed some help for my observation like you did ,,i'm indonesian

    repp to dananganasa@yahoo.com

    hopefully you could give us some help...

  • try it into the water

  • @laxwork Water would simply make it worse, since one point alone is that the density of water is higher than the density of air, having more friction.

  • You should paint that with a spiral, Put it in your hardest class, and tell your teacher to give you an A. :D

    I wonder if anyone knows what I'm talking about.

  • баян

  • How is this a motor? Looks a spinning top to me with very little friction.

  • Edison had DC power generators (to answer the question about batteries).

    Tesla introduced the idea of AC power (which can be transmitted over greater distances) but Edison fired him because this would have ended his plan of local power plants on practically every city block. Edison also wanted to use these power plants to charge his electric car!

  • @AcePilot101 Morgan was a Freemason who, each summer, went overseas to visit the Rothschild internatio­nal banking syndicate to plot ways to create financial chaos in order to steer the U.S. into setting up what is now known as the Federal Reserve system which has never been publicly audited since it's inception in 1913.

    I copied this off the net, it saved me the time of having to type it myself.

  • баян

  • what about the solar system? the planets revolve around the sun because of magnetic field, push and pull attributes ... and it's revolving for a billion years I guess ...

  • @oztechcomputercenter Unfortunately we don't have the benefit of the vacuum of outer space here on planet earth

  • x k no lo conectas a un foco para ver cuanta energia produce y si es mas de la k se nesecito para a serlo funsionar

  • Hey! Good JoB!

  • I invented a breakthrough energy source which violates the law of energy conservation. I have a PROOF that there are electrodynamic phenomena that violate the law of energy conservation. I am looking for $6M for a prototype and patents.

    H. Tomasz Grzybowski

    tel. +48-512-933-540

  • all of tomas edison's disigns ran on batterys,and he did it around 1900 where was he getting hes power? we can only wounder all his disigns wer suppress and cept by the gov. and they will never tell...

  • Trying to become rich from inventions is how you end any possibility of becoming rich (your own greed is used against you to defeat you) because you are very small attacking a very rich established powerful biz, who own the patent department so as to be the first to know of new threats to there establishments,The only way to win is to give new ideas away for free earn credibility then right a book about how you came up with idea!!!

  • Nice low friction setup but alas the y a slowin down .

    We always think that magnets can do work , for they do when combined with energy.

    Take away energy from the equation and no work will be done.

    But keep coming up with ideas, along with me and everyone else.

  • to deanjdk, yes but you admit there is energy, just as a car engine controls the explosion, use's it, and as such has to get rid of the power, exaust, after using it, just the same. a great clue i have given thee oh worlds of the past written laws that have not been re-written yet to give boost to the future's minds that will write the discoveries of tomarrow of which some undisclosed discoveries exist today.

  • @variablestatus at least you believ eit yourself ;)

  • awsome

  • nice

  • the small friction is the only impressive thing about this, if we could make frictionless transmision of power that would be a great thing, if we could levitate very big loads only with magnets

  • @ greenlivingitup . com it shows how to build a free energy device with magnets

    if a man empties his purse into his head, no one can take it away from him. an investment in knowledge always pays the best interest

  • Good job your very close I was waiting for someone to try using magnet levitation to reduce drag looks like it helps

  • Too bad it slows down after a while ... have you ever try adding a little generator to power a little motor to spin the wheel ?

  • ХУЕТА

  • or..

    Just watch this!

    watch?v=hkgyY47duCM&feature=re­lated

  • your helarious. Have you ever pushed a metal object with a magnet.....

    Well.... Just place another magnet where the object is pushed to....and make the objects path circular...... Magnets themselves are basically above unity energy.

  • @snowfan

    Wow.. your very observant!

    all that in what.. 2 minutes of research.

  • @MamoshBalla because you dont have to believe =)

  • Видно что замедляется, а должно быть наоборот!

    Что бы сделать магнитный двигатель, нужно ВЫЙТИ ЗА ПЛОСКОСТЬ.

    Шлак.

  • задумка и исполнение класс!

  • where to now then?.......

  • поля друг друга отталкивают и все!

  • @abmod01 Hi, if your using it now take a picture of it and post it for us to see.

  • gee, if the wright brothers had only listened to reason, not to mention columbus.

  • ach szkoda że to jest napęd elektryczny , oddalony od tego ustrojstwa 20 cm ale pomysł fajny

  • COOL

  • Holoa una pregunda DONDE SE PUEDE CONSEGUIR este MATERIAL ...

    Where i can get this material ?

  • Busca Neodymium magnet o imanes de Neodymium

  • I saw this exact video but they claimed it to be Adams motor. Hmmmm. Adams motor is great at 80% eff due to back emf.

  • Well a large version of one of these would require a powerful electro magnet, which would require a lot electricity to operate.

  • nop....this are making versions of.. a motor that already exists! but is being supressed! a guy one year ago made his car run with an Electro Magnetic Motor, which could be turned on by a D battery...and the power generated by the motor itself could make it accelerate.. it was slow on acceleration, but it ran! smoothly... i had it favorited had the name of the guy it appeared all over youtube.. when i was going to show my physics professor...IT WAS GONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ...fishy fishy

  • wow!!!!!

  • thu futuro

  • Not slowing down would be called perpetual motion; speeding up without a power input would be called free energy. I'm still waiting to see a free energy device.

  • what do yall make of John Searl's machine?

  • magnets doesent need an initial thrust to start being magnetic.all u need is 2 magnetic oposites witch one of them has a unbalance.place the 2 together and 1 will start to spinn inside the other :)

    do some 6th grade researtch before u flame these videos.being fake or not.

  • se frena ,no funciona,suerte la proxima

  • When it comes to perpetual motion everybody makes one big mistake, if the device needs an initial thrust or energy to start some cycle it will eventualy stop unless it increases speed some way after the first initial spin ( collection of energy, redistribution to increase speed ).

    Basicaly if you build a machine and at the moment you put it together it starts to function on its own, then you have it. It could last for years untill bearings or magnets lose there strength. I hope this was helpful

  • whorshit... Everybody knows one needs a catylst to begin chain reactions, or self-sustaining reactions.

    Like Combustion, for instance: lite a fire and it will chemically consume all available fuel, in this case is hydrogen bonds in organic matter. But this fire needed an initial catylst to raise temperature.

    In gravito-magnetics, the fuel would be the magnetic nature of the material and its environment in the cosmos.

    The snag is to find a configuration which optimizes that relationship.

  • I have seen motor's that use an initial thrust and accualy speed up! But it does not aply to this or to your Catylist, the idea of using a force to creat more is overunity!

    And the work force theory of catylist can not be used to describe overunity or perpetual motion without revision. My first comment is true and if you have seen some of the working models you will see they run when constructed agreeing only with your second comment but not as a fuel but a force & reaction,( fuel) is used up.

  • okay... how about an explosion. A wick is lit it carries a certain temperature with it to a charge. The wick catlyses the charges preliminary explosion which sets off the actual bomb.

    So small energy expenditure to bring about a large one. This is a chemical energy illustration.

    Giving a magnetic power structure a catlysing push also starts a chain reaction. Based on its construction, there is a feedback effect which spins at a "terminal velocity"

    Note: is a theory until realized.

  • Uh PEOPLE.. you can't make energy for FREE? Please understand that simple fact - the energy has to COME from somewhere! What's interesting is trying to come up with new ways of extracting the energy we know is there, so we can use it (such as from the water cycle)

  • we've been conditioned to believe that there is nothing outside of what we've already experienced.

    HOWEVER.

    in all of mainstream science's grandeur, splendor, and infallible logic .... it fails to explain the true nature of gravity.

    This plainly obvious fact coupled with the almost neurotic rejection of "Free energy" can be classified none other than hypocritical dogmatism.

    My hypothetical: "Free" energy isn't free, it is the nature of reality and an unexplored energy resevoir.

  • Very well put, my views exactly.

  • well said, there is no free energy,it is as free as a water wheel being turned a river,except int this case the river and water isnt as obvious

  • Comment removed

  • Cool

  • If you will have a free energy you dont need to pay, monetary system will end. Goverments cant control you.

  • exactly, people working in energy plants will lose thier jobs. no need for oil, or any renewable resource and it's research for becoming more efficient. if this were mass produced it would lay off hundreds of thousands of people. this is good for 3rd world contries but not countries like ourselves.

  • with energy free we wouldnt be slaves and work all the time

  • and thats the problem in it's self

  • get real... there would still be industry, society, entertainment... there is more to life than work... lets make nature work for us.

  • you dont understand

  • I think I do. You would still need engineers to create robots to extract raw materials, I cant fathom utilizing an energy source that takes alot of energy to produce. It is synonomous with fighting with one arm. It can be done but isn't nesessary.

    You are the type of person that would make a war to give soldiers something to do or a Keyesian economist who would pay a person fiat paper currency to dig a hole and fill it up again.

    Where is the intelligence in that?

    Help me understand

  • the people that get laid off thier jobs cant just so back to college and get thier master or Ph. d in mechanical engineering. they would have no money to pay for school and they would be in serious debt

  • so they become farmers and have time to learn stuff on their own. Which would you rather have, more cops or farmers.

    Housing prices would have to come down, its inconsionable to keep prices high and no one can buy em.

    Schooling prices do not have to stay high either. Hell we are going to be a 3rd world country soon anyway. people are losing their jobs, they are not being created because of inflated property pricing.

    The sooner we can drop those prices, the sooner we can get back to work

  • im pretty sure we wont all be a 3rd world country. unless we become a 3rd world country by 2100, we will be a level 1 civilization. do you realize how much land costs, it would be nearly imposible to just be a farmer when ever you feel like it.

  • what I don't understand is where does this sham industry of Realty get it's market price of land? Who determines the price? If no one can buy the land whos is it?

    I call bullshit on the whole industry. Probably brought upon this country by our 5th plank of the Communist manifesto. a central bank... which issues fiat paper

  • hey,  well put!

  • You still need food to run those pc's that run on electricity.

  • @mikhasya1976 YES.. THEY CAN.. HOW?... TAKE THE POWER OF THE MAGNETIC POWER AND CREATED A LAW

  • @mikhasya1976 thats why we havent seen much off they magnetic motors they have know about this for years, there is a magnetic motor that can power your whole house for free and it will make 5x more power than it needs to run i saw it on the news.. the government does'nt want you to have that... im sure one or two of these could power a car no more buying gas or electricity

  • There is no such thing as overunity. If there was you could plug a device into itself and it would continuously get heavier because E=mc^2

  • well it woudnt work like that. you cant plug something into it's self,

  • Exactly. If these devices produced free energy then you could plug them into themselves

  • no you cant, you dunt understand. your getting the energy from the waves in the air. like the magnetic attraction and repulsion. there has to be motion to change that energy, or at least a living organism. if you plug somthing into it's self then all your doing is pluging an object intoit's self. the only reason people call stuff with magnets free energy is becauuse there is no electricity, but three is still a foce adn waves and charged particles, it's over unity.

  • Then these devices don't produce free energy because something else has to add energy to make them work. If they produced free energy then you could use the energy generated by the device to power the device

  • watch-FREE ENERGY WATER PUMP MACHINE H2O GENERATOR !!!!!! NO GASOLINE THE MACHINE IS POWERING ITSELF SELF SUSTAINING

    watch-FUELLESS HEATER NO FUEL NO GAS NO WOOD NO GREEN HOUSE GASES

    watch-OVERUNITY IS REAL NO GASOLINE PERENDEV MOTOR FREE ENERGY

  • So why aren't these people powering their houses with these devices?

  • they are

  • Why haven't they sold them then? They should be billionaires if they can create "free energy"

  • mass production problems, and the government is probably preventing it

  • Why would the government prevent it? If it could generate free energy it would have a huge economic advantage over every other country

  • yeah..

  • this is not a motor, at least not in the sense of any practical application to drive anything, it is a toy.

  • please read "more info" and from there, this is a zero-point motor.a moving mass that is in an ever evolving frictionless environment that it can be neutral between positive and negative.once in this magnetic sphere,the mass has only to be put into motion once and from therefore it is moving. whatever power you inject into the magnetic motor will be a 1 to 1 ration of power in vs. power out. a motor that is in a magnetic field and its magnetic mass effortlessly/continues to flow through it.

  • Even if it was suspended in a vacuum it would not be frictionless. The magnetic fields themselves produce drag. In fact there are experimental braking systems that use magnetic fields with aluminum discs that can stop a car without actually touching. The effect is demonstrated in video 1gKr4Lnv0eM.

  • How much power could a motor like this produce?

  • None. Negative, in fact.

  • Motors cause motion, that is not a motor. You will not get any more energy than you put into that. All you can do is reduce the loss to as little as possible.

  • This looks convincing.

  • since you like magnets you probably love HHO. check out my new hho series. i have severe amounts of hydrogen production going on in a secret new sealed hho cell. i think you'll like it. peace...

  • course it might not lol

  • I think that works

  • you'd have to actaully extract energy , or it would explode i think?

  • could you extract energy from the storge cell if you enhance it chemically at the storage stage?

  • what if you put a coil at the bottom of you rotating wheel that creates electricity, then funnel that energy into chargable battery or storage , then use that energy back to push as an electromagnet for your wheel- rotate the energy flow

  • There is only one problem; you can not put a lode on this device. Or in other words you cannot extract energy because there is no excess energy.

  • read up on tseung or whatever his name his.. he used an offbalanced wheel to produce excess energy that could be "led out" Smart guys. I think you can still get the plans online somewhere since they want the knowledge out, and they're closer to production than anyone else. Don't post a dumb response to this. I won't be back to read it anyway.. It is what it is have fun.

  • I think the unlimited energy question is solved

  • it are long but not powerfull.. its useless

  • It's a very nifty bearing that you have here, and if it were suspended in a perfect vacuum, it would spin for a very, very long time. I think minor material defects etc. would introduce some slight wobble that would eventually stop it, but even so, all that means is that it's time to find better ways to manufacture the components and assemble them.

    I don't think it can be used as an energy source, though. You put energy in when you spin it up, and then if you take it out, it should stop.

  • to 420&nopo, you are both right,it will eventually stop and it is about as frictionless as you can get with holding a spinning shaft in axis with the frictionless magnetic field it's within. in other words, this is about as close to the 50/50 parallel field effect as you can get without hardly loosing any of the energy applied. the goal is to offset the field as has a few inventors and then i will have more power % to rotation then is to the braking effect and this will cause continual rotation.

  • above unity?

    pfffffffhhh.

  • would it be possible to put it in a vaccum envrinment? would that make it possible to reduce friction even further?

  • will this set up keep going forever with out stopping?

  • It stops... glass friction , air friction, this is a good machine but not produce energy.. or yes?

  • how long before it stops?

  • to ericwied, cont., the k-Mets model is magnetically latched. in other words invisible magnetic spur gears in clutch with each other. i have a video called start-up/k-Mets which you can see the latchings connecting with each other. i offer my open source ideas here for anyone to duplicate. the simple design i present is fact that i am not a hoax as "mutwa" who beleives in ocmpmm as real. what keeps the wheels spinning in sync with each other is kinetic-magnetic energy magnetically latched.

  • to ericwied, when you have nothing to hide you see everything as in k-Mets. as in the ocmpmm video you have flourescent lighting which makes the wheel look like it's spinning faster than it is, a hum in the background that speeds up with the wheel, silver reflective on side of wheel, no visual under table, speaker is being coached by someone else, slows stator at 4krpm in split second, al the ocmpmm builder would not deny the use of outside electrical power. never updated discovery,pure hoax.

  • ok does this prove oc mpmm or did u power it with a mono-polar motor great work btw

  • ok so this proves the oncept of oc mpmm right or have u charged the magnets to be a monopolar motor get back to me this is very interesting thanks

  • to PESNetwork, read my about this video and you'll find i mention slow down. since you've seen all the other k-Mets video's, take all the info contained and you'll, i'm sure, will be able to come up with an interesting question that i may answer for you.

  • to mutwa, the conservative approach i took means everyone can come to this level of thinking now that they have been introduced to it!

  • to mutwa,i am presenting models here that anyone can create, even you.spend some time exploring magnetic fields in a weigtless environment and you'll create your own k-Mets model that will surprise you and you'll have lots of fun with.then maybe your mind will become creative instead of pesimistic.then, and only then will you understand/see the laws of physics and the dimensions k-Mets is within and the possible future's it presents.

  • Compare beginning speed to ending speed. It slows down. It is more apparent in the other videos posted by variablestatus. I posted a page about this at PESWiki dot com. search "variablestatus".

  • This sad display doesn't prove the oc was a hoax..It only proves this was a hoax..and a poor one. Of course you can spin it from a distance with other motors..we knew that 100 years ago. I can create a movie of people going to the moon, does that mean the moon landings were hoaxed? Not really..

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more