Is this an honest martial arts form? I'm very intrigued by this tbh. Not sure if he's trying to show off a form or just going all starwars kid on camera.
true but yet all you would have to do is put an arrow head on it and there you go plus he looked really young so i wouldnt want him stabbing ppl with a spear
can't say much, I've never seen anything like this. However I can add that spinning a polearm of any sort reveals nearly all of the techniques one can use with it. For example any spin that blocks an attack can be simply continued to cause a counter attack.
OMG, you think axe and mace are used in similar way!!!??? i am using both weapons in full contact medieval fights, and i am absolutely sure that there is much difference.i want to ask from what are you taking your knowledge, any practise or what ??
hm, you said that there is no difference in way it hurts. of course techniques may cross, sword can be also use like spear in half-sword techniques. but it doesn't mean sword is spear. you can also write that axe is mace with difference edge.
have you any practical experience in using spear?? i have, and in this i used some techniques that are typical only for spear
Size would matter... a brute can pummel through almost any defense, its about grace and agility which the kid has, but hes small and an adult i suspect would be able to smack em around because of the greater reach, he'd be unable to get clear fast enough
-according which school? and what is a proper stance? like - what is a proper hit with the hand? not that some what whas done "properly" - but some what was achieving a goal.
2.fancy twirls?
- around him was a dozen of peples who sitting wery close.can you imagine if the stick was going on from his hands? look carefully - he was keeping stick very very strongly in the hands - and this is not fancy - its for real.
yes yes - thats the point - get out and do everything like you are in middle of the enemies, in the woods, "non stop" - like a berserk... now - after so much time has gone - he do not believe himself, that the boy who do this was him :)
no no - there are different spears:):)))) and different movements (not only for using spears). this movements are for short spear. anyway - there are 5 types of movements - one against one, one against many, many against one, many against many and line against line. and this particulary movements are from "one against many". with best regards.
whatever. vedic knowledge. Some of the famous japanese nindzjutsu schools was founded by previous pirats from southchina and vyetnam. In vyetnam they have so called vyetnames nindzjutsu school Khuay To. This school was coming with brahmins from south india at the 1st century to khmer kingdom.
The point is - that this "pirat" japanese school succes was "innovation" from old traditions unknown before for other japanese schools - movement differentation. Especially - many against one. particulary - 3 against 1. The history was - that no master was able to stand against this technics.
its the same with sikhs who fight the muslims. There is history that 700 sikhs defeated 15000 muslims. How? With movements one against many. Cuz muslims do not know before this differentation - they loose. But if they will know this - they will winn.
so your a master of the one against many technic? but if your understanding of the physics of the weapon, sorry i couldn't put it any better than that, then you know how it can be used when against one on one or one against many. if your understanding of the weapon is better than of course your probably going to win. i believe that its not the style but the person who uses it.
off course - knowledge is only knowledge. Person is most important. And i am not any kind of a master. I just had studied this technics for a long - i just had put one leg in - and i recognize, how BIG this thing is. More you know - more you know, that you do not know nothing.
The same - with vedic martial arts KNOWLEDGE - you can evolve for eternity - and there will never be end. Its not just katas (natas) or schools - its much more. 3 levels of movements. 5 types of movements in this 3 levels. 5 kinds of weapons - and with every of the 3x5 mentioned movements. 3 most important topics in fighting, 3 kinds of trainings for getting this topics till your body get common with them. 5 basis for training principles, 5 methods...
i just call numbers - but for every number there is real movements and praxis - and i have studied this, at least - i have tryed to proove this - and thats the most wonderfull thing - when you understand - that your life is for short to get all, but one moment of trying is for long to not get all :):):) anyway. thats wonderfull. BUT - if its not your duty, than you should left this, and you should do - what is your duty. S0 - i left. Thats all.
yea, using any katana stance against that kid will beat him, its a key importance to have you balance, concentration and view to win. also he seemed to be looking down alot, i could just block 3 of hit fancy worls and then slice his head clean off his sholders hmf it think he needs to learn balance and how to keep his head up when doing it
The Vedas do not advocate ANYTHING. Not vegetarianism, for sure. It may be mentioned, advisable, auspicious, but that doesna mean you can attribute it to the texts as a whole. I find it hard to believe that Indo Aryan kshatriyas were vegetarians. Very hard to believe. Did you miss the descriptions of hunting all over the place in the ancient Aryan texts?
NO - vedas advocate devotional service to the SUPREME PERSONALITY of GOADHED - VISHNU (Krishna, Narayana). CLEARLY!
Vedas advocate vegetarianism for Brahmanas as basic standart - FOR SURE.
So called Indo Aryan kshatriyas, if they was vaisnavas - they was vegetarians for SURE. Even nonaryan romans gladiators was vegetarians, greek sparta's fighters and etc. - what to speak about great devoties of Lord - like Dhruva maharaja or others.
Actually the point is, that you are thinking like christians or communists - that WE and NOW are the more elevated than thos old time barbarians. But truth is opposit - we are more degradated than old time CIVILISATIONS.
Have you even thought about meanings of thi words - VEDIC CIVILISATION. You can leave all your prejudice - and just start to try to understand. VEDAS - KNOWLEDGE. even about hunting.
Jeez, man, I'm talking of the Ashvamedha Yajna in the Rig Veda, and it CLEARLY states that Brahmin priests are to eat the horse meat after it is prepared(the precise way in which it is to be prepared is also given, if you have any further doubts..). Also, underlying your comments is the misconception that the Vedas are some sort of doctrine or unified text, which they are not. They were NEVER meant to be directions, cause as a whole they are full of contradictions...
refuse. who you are to say what vedas are and what they are not? you are like so called western scholars, who never ever had tryed to even sing one mantra properly, but giving large explanations about vedic mantras. They speak about "earlier" and "later" vedas, completely ignoring information about, what are in the vedas self. So - PROOF YOUR WORDS! PROOF YOUR "CLEAR" statements.
Actually Buddha didnt say that there is no God. When someone ask him about Supreme God - He was just silent. But if we go back to the topic - actually you are wrong, when you say - that "The vedas encourage kshatriyas to eat beef, and brahmins to eat meat(after the horse sacrifice.." - this is deep deep misconception. May be you just do not know whats the goal and purpose of the vedas. Vhat vedas encouraging peoples. ???
No man, it's VERY clearly directed for the horse meat to be COOKED and CONSUMED by the priests...Most translations of the Vedas are incomplete, and contain only popular shlokas..maybe that's the problem. It is clearly stated that the ingestion of the horse shall enrich the priests and blah blah
hmm. may be then some vedic scholars are right about that, that the main point about Buddhas incarnation is, that during the time vedic priests degradated so deep, that they start to do sacrifices only for getting "legal" meateating... But Buddha came and say - NO!, ahimsa, no slaughtering, no vedas... poor Buddha, if he will know, that now he's followers eat meat without any sacrifices...
and also here i cannot agree. Cuz many priests was vaisnavas. Vaisnava - strict vaisnava - eat only Visnu (Krishna) prasad (food what was offered to Visnu(Krishna)). But according to sastras, you cannot offer to Krishna meat, and you cann not offer to Vishnu anything, what was offered before to someone else. So - there is deep misconception - about your "clearly directions". Thats should be "clearly directed out" :)
I've read the verse in the rig veda regarding the horse sacrifice, which prescribes for the horse to be consumed, esp. by the priests officiating at the sacrifice..
what i am understanding from rgveda and yajurveda and other sources - that after asvamedha yajna parts of sacrificed horse was offered for demigods by priests (but not FOR priests), and some parts - to the king wifes. Like during many other sacrifices - brahmanas was gifted with cows - but never for eating. And in other places there are clear restrictions for brahmanas to ever never eat meat. from the beginning - looks like contradiction, but if you go deeper - all its plain and simple.
Ah, and the Vedas are not the holy books of Hinduism at all. You'd be better off reserving that space for the Shastras etc. The vedas encourage kshatriyas to eat beef, and brahmins to eat meat(after the horse sacrifice..). So the current form of Hinduism may be rooted in the Vedas, but does not encompass them
Thats also interesting. Iwould like to know exact shlokas from vedas, were there are encouragment for kshatriyas to eat beef, and to brahmins to eat meat after sacrifices. I have heard about this before, but no one has given any exact shlokas. I have tried to find also - but no evidences (off course - i do not speak about tamaguna tantric practices). Off course - my searching capacities are also limited - if you know, share please.
and if i will follow your logic - than what you are saying is - that goal of asvameddha yajna (and other yajnas) is "encouraging for meat eating". This is actually complete nonsenss. Isn'it?
Hinduism is so complex(and momre of a culture than a religion) because of the fact that it sucks everything into itself...I am of Scythina origin, and a Vedantist. I make that distinction because I do not believe in Brahmanic Hinduism. I just find the Vedic metaphysics interesting.
Though I do appreciate the fact that Hinduism allows everyone space to believe in God the way they want to. It is not a doctrine.
Thats interesting point of wiew. Hinduism allows... :) When some one ask: What is hinduism? Where are roots of this term? Than you can get really crazy answers. The point is, taht "hinduism" dosn't exist. This is just "therm" what modern so called scholars and politicans use in their mobble bobbles. If we will not use anymor this word - than we will be much closer to the truth.
I am not worry, If someone claim, that "in the Rig Veda, the chief dieties are Agni, Indra, Ushas, Rudra etc."-he should proof that from rgveda. Cuz rgveda says oposit, that
2. one who accept vedis social varnashrama dharma system
3. one who accept (or at least do not denied) that Lord Vishnu (Rama, Krishna, Narayana) is the supreme personality of Godhead - this is according Rigveda meaning of the word arya.
Yes, it seems like you aren't one of those ignorant people who thought Aryan's were a race. You possess some great skills in vedic history. Considering the Aryan Race theory & its superiority like the white power fools is justifying the mass murder of 6 million innocent victims. I feel a little emberassed now trying to tell you about the Vedas. I do apologize :=)
Nataradzha, just like many of the slavic people out to hijack Hinduism for their 'Aryan' purposes, you dabble but you learn nothing. In the Rig Veda, the chief dieties are Agni, Indra, Ushas, Rudra etc. Rama, Krishna, Shiva, Narayana were later additions from Dravidian tradition. Hinduism is a aggregation of the beliefs of the Aryans and Dravidians.
Have you even read Rgveda?and tried to study Rgveda from original sanskrit with agamas? and look out different Rg veda translations in german, english and russian and than make a decision? I have for 3 years, and i can say - what you are saying in your comments is complete ignorance without no doubt, based on ideological thesis and not on the truth. Truth in Rg veda are:
Nataradzha, just by quoting random verses from the Vedas, you get no where. It works if your aim is just to feel great about yourself. Do you see the word Narayana, Krishna, Rama or Shiva in the Vedas? No. That is what I was talking about.
NO? YES! Narayana, Krishna, Rama and Shiva in the Vedas? May be we should start with Narayana sUktaM -part of Rgveda? Or with ViSnu stanzas from Rgveda? Or from Upanishads-exmpl. GopalatapaniyopaniSad? can you look on context in which these words are placed also?
sac cid ananda rupaya
krsnaya klista karine
namo vedanta vedyaya
gurave buddhi sakSine
Why you are not looking to the truth? You speak about vedas-no qoutes. no simply answers to the questions-tonns of words, no even one answer...
and- You cannot find in vedas word hinduism. You cannot proof your ideology. BUT When i proof my words-you call-"its random verses".And even more-after that you say, that there is no words Narayana, Krishna, Rama or Shiva in the vedas. Why? Ehat is the reason of such retarded behaviour? i can quote thosands verses with words Narayana, Krishna, Rama or Shiva from the vedas. You will say-oh,its just random. And after-again-there is no such words in the vedas...
The music was original. This track is form composition Gangass. Made by Aigars Gravers from Latvia (quite well known and famous musician in baltic states) specially for Ramadance (the name of one stage and musical project). Other track (for dancing with 2 swords) is from composition Avatara.
very nice, i liked the ideia of recreating the danger of the battlefield. you seem very knolegeble(dont know the word) petty you're agressive and disrespectful on the other vids comments..thats the weakness of those who have power over the subject. anyways keep it up you're cool
its sad, if you feel disrespect and agressiveness in other vids coments what i have made. May be i am wrong, to go in this discussions, and may be it's not the best way how it was done. Yeah - i should be more carefull, cuz its so easy to cross the line. Thanks for advice.
when this art was in use, there was no even such word in use - like "indian". But there was "aryans" - followers of vedic culture. Vedas - "knowledge" about all aspects of life. Word "india" was product of colonial ideologists...
Wrong. I think you are using Thang Ta. It's a Meerut art native only to India. There is also nothing such as Aryans. The Aryan words comes for the Aryan Invasion Theory which holds no scientific or haplogroupic(DNA) evidence. So the vedas were written and practiced in India. The words Aryan means full of spirit.
Why its wrong? Off course i and my sons using Manipuri Thang Ta in the line of how it was presented by Khilton Nonghmaithen. So, Indo Aryan its just therm what i am using. And you are not correct to immediately fight this word - aryan. This word was pure vedic therm. And off course - so called Aryan invasion theory misused this word, like Adolph Hitler misused swastika sign.
And secondly, the British didn't put India's name. It was used by the Latin speakers to describe Sindhu(India) in Alexanders time. India was called "Indos". The word India comes from "Indos".
So - off course, vedas was written and practiced in Bharata varsha, but do not minimize vedic culture - it was spreaded all over the Eurasia continent. So - therm Indo Aryan i am using with positive tendences, off course - more precise will be just "aryan". aryan - cuz Bhishma, Drona, brahmanas in Parasurama line, descendants of Rama - they was the best of aryans.
Good on the theory. But, you have to understand Aryan is not a race. It never existed. There is no connection between Eruasia or baltic states and Indians. There never was. The rig veda specifically says Aryan is a light of vision. It's the spirit which fills any man. Everyone single ethnicity in this world can be aryan. It's not given to you at birth - you have to earn it!
Nataradzha, you are simply repeating the mistake you made earlier. Rama had only two kids - Lava and Kusha. Bhishma and Drona eons (Yugas) after Rama, none of them in the direct line of descent from Rama.
Besides, Rama was dark colored. He was probably a Dravidian hero absorbed into Aryan beliefs, just like Krishna. In your haste to steal Indian lore to inflate your silly 'Aryan' pride, you have not cared to read any of the ancient Sanskrit works.
and also please, teach yourself to be more accurat.
1. i hav studied in sanskrit Mahabharata, Ramayana, Rgveda, Upanisads (Isha, Katha, Gopalatapani and etc.), Srimad Bhagavatam, Upadesamrita and so on., analizing different scientific translations.
2. Where in the vedas you will find therms "dravidian" and "indian"?
3. Where in Ramayana you will find that Rama was darkcolored?
4. Where in the vedas you will find, that aryans was "belivers"?
and more - there are now such hinduism in reality - its just ideological assuption and political klishe, but in the reality - vedas has nothing with "hinduism". like "hinduism" has nothing with vedas (you will not find in vedas such a word)
Nataradzha, To say that no such thing called Hinduism exists, is the height of idiocy. The Vedas are 4 of the main texts of that religion. Anyway, facts don't matter, only the fantasies u cook up to inflate ur Aryan pride matter to u.
If a donkey gets hold of books, it will just eat them & produce dung. When people like you get hold of ancient books, you just produce more ignorance & empty pride.
Nataradzha, "India" is a name given by Greeks to that land. The Sanskrit works refer to that land as BhaaratVarsha. You claim great Sanskrit scholarship, yet you are ignorant of this simple fact.
You are truly an Aryan. Only an Aryan can dwell in such depths of ignorance yet have so much empty pride & egoism. This Aryan trait is very apparent even from the ancient Sanskrit books of Hinduism.
1.Greeks was mlecchas, and not follovers of vedic culture. And BharatavarSa according vedic cosmography dos not mean indian subcontinent. teach yourself, please
2. and one more time - what dos it mean - ancient Sanskrit books of hinduism? If hinduism dosnt exist before, than how this ancient Sanskrit books can be books of hinduism? no logic.
3.vedic culture are based not on the books, but on the SRUTI-mutual tradition.
Its not stupidity. It is special. Usually battlefield is not covered with flower petals... And that was heavy viking sword (battle ready replica of 8 th century). I would like to have rajput heavy tulwar also - but its hard to get replicas from them in europe...
How does this have more dislikes than likes? That kid was very impressive.
GaraLuiMartin 2 months ago
Is this an honest martial arts form? I'm very intrigued by this tbh. Not sure if he's trying to show off a form or just going all starwars kid on camera.
tarrker 2 months ago
nobody is gonna steal this kids glue sticks in school.
landonfaint 2 months ago
avatar?
binot 3 months ago
Very nice, nice kid!!! Good boy!!
Thebuffalo004 4 months ago
Behold! the new lightsaber kid.
AkujiMalice 4 months ago
It looks like my little brother playing with sticks.
PipersGrip 6 months ago 2
indian martial art?
guinew134 8 months ago
this i awkward to watch
vyrewatch12321 9 months ago
Deadly Cute. =3
extragunbon 9 months ago
Now I know why medieval knights were taught their arts from the age of seven...
Maergensargoth 11 months ago 3
O_o o.0
GhostFilms2010 1 year ago
If there's any one thing I respect about this style, it's that it's relentless. There is no point he is not attacking.
Deibodese 1 year ago
Thats one hell of a rave.
Stug0 1 year ago 6
That is AWESOME:D
falloutshit 1 year ago
What the fuck is with that shit house music????? RUINS the video. Not how you use a spear either. Fail.
fossegrimen13 1 year ago
At 0:35 he tires to force push!
DoubleH42 1 year ago 3
lol who does that kid think he is the master jedi anakin skywalker? but yes impressive
toontown115 1 year ago
lol noobs
ThePeachCockTaiL 1 year ago
he needs a blue arrow.....
YinGuoDao 1 year ago 3
Is it me or does this remind you of the starwars guy that flails about with the light saber
jellyfishflab 1 year ago 3
@jellyfishflab Haha! That's exactly what I was thinking! Whew, I'm glad I'm not the only one.
jeffdoeskungfu 1 year ago
Hmm... Raver/ Krishna. I don't think thats what the veda stands for, Funky bass coming through a sunwoofer.
micsir888 1 year ago
Can that still be considered a spear?
CaelestisPeste 1 year ago
I wonder if I can beet him in a spear vs sword battle
ninetailedfoxify 1 year ago
If this is the great-grandson of odin?
adamisdegaudi 2 years ago 3
Now he can help Mommy cleaning the house, just swapping the spear for a broom. He will never notice.
Heliosx15005 2 years ago
kick him in the face and watchhim twiddle his stick!
dickcassidy 2 years ago
yeah that's a boy
lordblades 2 years ago
im so jealos d00d
Germanboy567 2 years ago
Wow, I really like th way he did that. Th way he did that was great. I would say th way he did it was th best I have seen. cunt.
xxxxDre4mxxxx 2 years ago
lol
godrugal1 2 years ago
lol fail
WitfulThought 2 years ago
uhhhh thats more of a a stick i would say.....
IBroughtUTheHorizon7 2 years ago 4
true but yet all you would have to do is put an arrow head on it and there you go plus he looked really young so i wouldnt want him stabbing ppl with a spear
holyblades989 2 years ago
I like seeing the Dad (dad like person) supporting the Child.
jesuskopp 2 years ago
Yeah, just imagine how proud the father would be.
thatguyoverthereFTW 2 years ago 4
thats not a spear dummy
royboyrp3 2 years ago
can't say much, I've never seen anything like this. However I can add that spinning a polearm of any sort reveals nearly all of the techniques one can use with it. For example any spin that blocks an attack can be simply continued to cause a counter attack.
Scalier 2 years ago
OMG, you think axe and mace are used in similar way!!!??? i am using both weapons in full contact medieval fights, and i am absolutely sure that there is much difference.i want to ask from what are you taking your knowledge, any practise or what ??
slavuBOG 2 years ago
you should ask your mom
IBroughtUTheHorizon7 2 years ago
you should ask yourself your mom
slavuBOG 2 years ago
????
IBroughtUTheHorizon7 2 years ago 3
hm, you said that there is no difference in way it hurts. of course techniques may cross, sword can be also use like spear in half-sword techniques. but it doesn't mean sword is spear. you can also write that axe is mace with difference edge.
have you any practical experience in using spear?? i have, and in this i used some techniques that are typical only for spear
slavuBOG 2 years ago
no spear!! it is staff
diference is big, not only in looks but mostly in way spear is using
slavuBOG 2 years ago 2
i wish im trained like that when i was little...
icecrimson 3 years ago
I noticed how he swung the staff around... Nothing more.
KhmerDubbed 3 years ago
that was bullsh... no AVESOME
mangaboy651 3 years ago
haha, he'll be one hell of a bar fighter with a pool stick when he grows up
spartan247 3 years ago 29
ghetto
dynastyflygon 3 years ago
is this a supposed ancestor shaolin
malevolenceXXXensues 3 years ago
Wonderful...
aiko4321 3 years ago
impresive skill for that age, he has promising skills when he ages!
aerodragonis 3 years ago 2
i expecteded more
dragon300456 3 years ago
Hehee, great fun to watch-- i dont think anyone knows that music whas?
UBERMOVIESs 3 years ago
*poke* kid dies
THExSAUCE 3 years ago
He'd scratch your nuts out before you'd have a chance to even poke him :P
h4ku89 3 years ago
How kinky.
holdmineplease 3 years ago
Size would matter... a brute can pummel through almost any defense, its about grace and agility which the kid has, but hes small and an adult i suspect would be able to smack em around because of the greater reach, he'd be unable to get clear fast enough
bcritchison 3 years ago
thats a bow staff, not a spear
burzum6man 3 years ago
By who, a 72 year old master that has been training for 56 years on the spear and owns his own school? Against this child thats like 4 years old?
MapleSephiroth 3 years ago
cute but not a master
Ragorxx 3 years ago
for a kid hes good
Mizerabledanny 3 years ago
what was that!!!???!!!...ok nice..I think
HyuugaFaisal 3 years ago
I wasn't even expecting the kid to do anything haha. That is one disciplined child. Impresive.
nik0lla 3 years ago 16
@nik0lla: What exactly IS discipline? No really, I have forgot what it means :/. I thought it meant self-control. If I'm right, then my apoligies XD.
Khornedevotee 1 year ago
by the time hes 18 he'll kick ass
kittyg31 3 years ago
Hes trying to swing it around his head*
hijimi963 3 years ago
still a lil stunty....
but when he'll grow older , he will get stronger , better :) expert ^^
Kolashov 3 years ago
Excellent work ! Very nice !
Nerferit 3 years ago
aww he's cute
mongolnudraga 3 years ago
execellent control of weapon.
dantankun 3 years ago
Hmm some Wushu Wannabes...
danpt2000 3 years ago
tell me about it...
ShadowxVincent 2 years ago
tsss I think that that boy better first start bo before spear
simjacobs 4 years ago
if i was fighting him i'll gust grab a frickin gun!!!!!!!!!!!!
soupizcool 4 years ago
um i don't know...the boys stance was wrong ad didn't look very stable also it looked like he was just throwing in some fancy twirls
AinokeA365 4 years ago
1.stance was wrong?
-according which school? and what is a proper stance? like - what is a proper hit with the hand? not that some what whas done "properly" - but some what was achieving a goal.
2.fancy twirls?
- around him was a dozen of peples who sitting wery close.can you imagine if the stick was going on from his hands? look carefully - he was keeping stick very very strongly in the hands - and this is not fancy - its for real.
Nataradzha 4 years ago
when i say his stance was wrong what i meant was that he didn't seem very stable like he was all over the place
AinokeA365 4 years ago
yes yes - thats the point - get out and do everything like you are in middle of the enemies, in the woods, "non stop" - like a berserk... now - after so much time has gone - he do not believe himself, that the boy who do this was him :)
Nataradzha 4 years ago
i guess i just can't win this arguement
AinokeA365 4 years ago
oh yeah uh also the spear is used to stab i would have named this video instead master in progress of the "staff"
AinokeA365 4 years ago
no no - there are different spears:):)))) and different movements (not only for using spears). this movements are for short spear. anyway - there are 5 types of movements - one against one, one against many, many against one, many against many and line against line. and this particulary movements are from "one against many". with best regards.
Nataradzha 4 years ago
oh i see so r u a master then?
no exaggeration intended
AinokeA365 4 years ago
whatever. vedic knowledge. Some of the famous japanese nindzjutsu schools was founded by previous pirats from southchina and vyetnam. In vyetnam they have so called vyetnames nindzjutsu school Khuay To. This school was coming with brahmins from south india at the 1st century to khmer kingdom.
Nataradzha 4 years ago
The point is - that this "pirat" japanese school succes was "innovation" from old traditions unknown before for other japanese schools - movement differentation. Especially - many against one. particulary - 3 against 1. The history was - that no master was able to stand against this technics.
Nataradzha 4 years ago
its the same with sikhs who fight the muslims. There is history that 700 sikhs defeated 15000 muslims. How? With movements one against many. Cuz muslims do not know before this differentation - they loose. But if they will know this - they will winn.
Nataradzha 4 years ago
so your a master of the one against many technic? but if your understanding of the physics of the weapon, sorry i couldn't put it any better than that, then you know how it can be used when against one on one or one against many. if your understanding of the weapon is better than of course your probably going to win. i believe that its not the style but the person who uses it.
AinokeA365 4 years ago
off course - knowledge is only knowledge. Person is most important. And i am not any kind of a master. I just had studied this technics for a long - i just had put one leg in - and i recognize, how BIG this thing is. More you know - more you know, that you do not know nothing.
Nataradzha 4 years ago
The same - with vedic martial arts KNOWLEDGE - you can evolve for eternity - and there will never be end. Its not just katas (natas) or schools - its much more. 3 levels of movements. 5 types of movements in this 3 levels. 5 kinds of weapons - and with every of the 3x5 mentioned movements. 3 most important topics in fighting, 3 kinds of trainings for getting this topics till your body get common with them. 5 basis for training principles, 5 methods...
Nataradzha 4 years ago
i just call numbers - but for every number there is real movements and praxis - and i have studied this, at least - i have tryed to proove this - and thats the most wonderfull thing - when you understand - that your life is for short to get all, but one moment of trying is for long to not get all :):):) anyway. thats wonderfull. BUT - if its not your duty, than you should left this, and you should do - what is your duty. S0 - i left. Thats all.
Nataradzha 4 years ago
yea, using any katana stance against that kid will beat him, its a key importance to have you balance, concentration and view to win. also he seemed to be looking down alot, i could just block 3 of hit fancy worls and then slice his head clean off his sholders hmf it think he needs to learn balance and how to keep his head up when doing it
enciclodapedia 4 years ago
yeah because in real life you don't fight like that with twirls you block attack counter and all of that, usually a fight is finished in 3 moves
if you want to see what i mean type this down into the youtube search bar
Some long sword fencing pieces after Danzig & Ringeck
AinokeA365 4 years ago
you also don't around fighting kids douche
hitman91788 4 years ago
wow u could beat a little kid :O AMAZING (not really) also this kid rocks
pablow2310 3 years ago
what exactly are we watching?
TonyNhollywood 4 years ago
little boy is just happy to do what he has seen from what he's father has done. :)
Nataradzha 4 years ago
The Vedas do not advocate ANYTHING. Not vegetarianism, for sure. It may be mentioned, advisable, auspicious, but that doesna mean you can attribute it to the texts as a whole. I find it hard to believe that Indo Aryan kshatriyas were vegetarians. Very hard to believe. Did you miss the descriptions of hunting all over the place in the ancient Aryan texts?
siddistani 4 years ago
NO - vedas advocate devotional service to the SUPREME PERSONALITY of GOADHED - VISHNU (Krishna, Narayana). CLEARLY!
Vedas advocate vegetarianism for Brahmanas as basic standart - FOR SURE.
So called Indo Aryan kshatriyas, if they was vaisnavas - they was vegetarians for SURE. Even nonaryan romans gladiators was vegetarians, greek sparta's fighters and etc. - what to speak about great devoties of Lord - like Dhruva maharaja or others.
Nataradzha 4 years ago
Actually the point is, that you are thinking like christians or communists - that WE and NOW are the more elevated than thos old time barbarians. But truth is opposit - we are more degradated than old time CIVILISATIONS.
Have you even thought about meanings of thi words - VEDIC CIVILISATION. You can leave all your prejudice - and just start to try to understand. VEDAS - KNOWLEDGE. even about hunting.
Nataradzha 4 years ago
Jeez, man, I'm talking of the Ashvamedha Yajna in the Rig Veda, and it CLEARLY states that Brahmin priests are to eat the horse meat after it is prepared(the precise way in which it is to be prepared is also given, if you have any further doubts..). Also, underlying your comments is the misconception that the Vedas are some sort of doctrine or unified text, which they are not. They were NEVER meant to be directions, cause as a whole they are full of contradictions...
siddistani 4 years ago
refuse. who you are to say what vedas are and what they are not? you are like so called western scholars, who never ever had tryed to even sing one mantra properly, but giving large explanations about vedic mantras. They speak about "earlier" and "later" vedas, completely ignoring information about, what are in the vedas self. So - PROOF YOUR WORDS! PROOF YOUR "CLEAR" statements.
Nataradzha 4 years ago
Proof with sastric evidences -
1. about that that Brahmin priests are to eat the horse meat
2. about Vedas are some sort of NOTunified text
3. that they are full of contradictions
- and after that i will proof OPPOSIT (thats the rules for vedic discussions)
Nataradzha 4 years ago
Vedas advocate vegetarianism and not killing animals and certainly never offer animals in their Yajnas!
The Vedic word frequantly mentioned is Aghnya = not to be killed. This word was in particular used for cows.
Aahavaniiye maamsapratishedha (Katyayana Sutra)
That which is used in Yajna (aahavaniiya) must be vegetarian
Nataradzha 4 years ago
I think the worst that the Buddha could witnes is the fact that he said there is no God, and now he has been deified..
siddistani 4 years ago
Actually Buddha didnt say that there is no God. When someone ask him about Supreme God - He was just silent. But if we go back to the topic - actually you are wrong, when you say - that "The vedas encourage kshatriyas to eat beef, and brahmins to eat meat(after the horse sacrifice.." - this is deep deep misconception. May be you just do not know whats the goal and purpose of the vedas. Vhat vedas encouraging peoples. ???
Nataradzha 4 years ago
No man, it's VERY clearly directed for the horse meat to be COOKED and CONSUMED by the priests...Most translations of the Vedas are incomplete, and contain only popular shlokas..maybe that's the problem. It is clearly stated that the ingestion of the horse shall enrich the priests and blah blah
siddistani 4 years ago
hmm. may be then some vedic scholars are right about that, that the main point about Buddhas incarnation is, that during the time vedic priests degradated so deep, that they start to do sacrifices only for getting "legal" meateating... But Buddha came and say - NO!, ahimsa, no slaughtering, no vedas... poor Buddha, if he will know, that now he's followers eat meat without any sacrifices...
Nataradzha 4 years ago
and also here i cannot agree. Cuz many priests was vaisnavas. Vaisnava - strict vaisnava - eat only Visnu (Krishna) prasad (food what was offered to Visnu(Krishna)). But according to sastras, you cannot offer to Krishna meat, and you cann not offer to Vishnu anything, what was offered before to someone else. So - there is deep misconception - about your "clearly directions". Thats should be "clearly directed out" :)
Nataradzha 4 years ago
I've read the verse in the rig veda regarding the horse sacrifice, which prescribes for the horse to be consumed, esp. by the priests officiating at the sacrifice..
siddistani 4 years ago
what i am understanding from rgveda and yajurveda and other sources - that after asvamedha yajna parts of sacrificed horse was offered for demigods by priests (but not FOR priests), and some parts - to the king wifes. Like during many other sacrifices - brahmanas was gifted with cows - but never for eating. And in other places there are clear restrictions for brahmanas to ever never eat meat. from the beginning - looks like contradiction, but if you go deeper - all its plain and simple.
Nataradzha 4 years ago
But verse 10.87.16 in the 10th mandalam of the rig veda absolutely prohibits meat eating of cow, horse, and other animals alike - 10.87.16
Or liten to Yajur Veda Samhita 12.32:
"You must not use your God given body for killing God's creatures, whether they are human, animal or whatever."
Nataradzha 4 years ago
Ah, and the Vedas are not the holy books of Hinduism at all. You'd be better off reserving that space for the Shastras etc. The vedas encourage kshatriyas to eat beef, and brahmins to eat meat(after the horse sacrifice..). So the current form of Hinduism may be rooted in the Vedas, but does not encompass them
siddistani 4 years ago
Thats also interesting. Iwould like to know exact shlokas from vedas, were there are encouragment for kshatriyas to eat beef, and to brahmins to eat meat after sacrifices. I have heard about this before, but no one has given any exact shlokas. I have tried to find also - but no evidences (off course - i do not speak about tamaguna tantric practices). Off course - my searching capacities are also limited - if you know, share please.
Nataradzha 4 years ago
and if i will follow your logic - than what you are saying is - that goal of asvameddha yajna (and other yajnas) is "encouraging for meat eating". This is actually complete nonsenss. Isn'it?
Nataradzha 4 years ago
Hinduism is so complex(and momre of a culture than a religion) because of the fact that it sucks everything into itself...I am of Scythina origin, and a Vedantist. I make that distinction because I do not believe in Brahmanic Hinduism. I just find the Vedic metaphysics interesting.
Though I do appreciate the fact that Hinduism allows everyone space to believe in God the way they want to. It is not a doctrine.
siddistani 4 years ago
Thats interesting point of wiew. Hinduism allows... :) When some one ask: What is hinduism? Where are roots of this term? Than you can get really crazy answers. The point is, taht "hinduism" dosn't exist. This is just "therm" what modern so called scholars and politicans use in their mobble bobbles. If we will not use anymor this word - than we will be much closer to the truth.
Nataradzha 4 years ago
Don't worry about the stupid arguments with argumentative people.
You and your sons are great.
What you do with sword and staff is great.
Krishna has blessed you.
Rama has blessed you.
Vishnu has taught you to use the weapons of war for defense of your Dharma.
God bless you and keep working hard to perfect that which leads to perfection.
You don't need to argue with these people just say Om Hari Om and leave it at that.
OM
leeeleaden 4 years ago
I am not worry, If someone claim, that "in the Rig Veda, the chief dieties are Agni, Indra, Ushas, Rudra etc."-he should proof that from rgveda. Cuz rgveda says oposit, that
urum yajNA cakrathur ulokaM janayantA sUryam uSAsam agnim...
You (ViSNu) have made spacious room for sacrificing by generating Surya, Dawn, and Agni...
thats the simply truth. And in the same way with every statemnt.
Nataradzha 4 years ago
Arya means:
1. one who accept vedas as sacred scriptures
2. one who accept vedis social varnashrama dharma system
3. one who accept (or at least do not denied) that Lord Vishnu (Rama, Krishna, Narayana) is the supreme personality of Godhead - this is according Rigveda meaning of the word arya.
Nataradzha 4 years ago
Yes, it seems like you aren't one of those ignorant people who thought Aryan's were a race. You possess some great skills in vedic history. Considering the Aryan Race theory & its superiority like the white power fools is justifying the mass murder of 6 million innocent victims. I feel a little emberassed now trying to tell you about the Vedas. I do apologize :=)
nsreed 4 years ago
Nataradzha, just like many of the slavic people out to hijack Hinduism for their 'Aryan' purposes, you dabble but you learn nothing. In the Rig Veda, the chief dieties are Agni, Indra, Ushas, Rudra etc. Rama, Krishna, Shiva, Narayana were later additions from Dravidian tradition. Hinduism is a aggregation of the beliefs of the Aryans and Dravidians.
xmtz 4 years ago
Have you even read Rgveda?and tried to study Rgveda from original sanskrit with agamas? and look out different Rg veda translations in german, english and russian and than make a decision? I have for 3 years, and i can say - what you are saying in your comments is complete ignorance without no doubt, based on ideological thesis and not on the truth. Truth in Rg veda are:
tad ViSNoH paramaM padaM sadA paSyanti sUrayaH
but i think, that actually you dont care.
Nataradzha 4 years ago
And this verse from Rgveda 7 99 04
urum yajNA cakrathur ulokaM janayantA sUryam uSAsam agnim...
is not maded by slavic peoples. And even such a iudeochristian apologet as P.Griffit translates this no other than:
You (ViSNu) have made spacious room for sacrificing by generating Surya, Dawn, and Agni...
Thats one. Second - have you even know what that: PuruSa sUktaM and Narayana sUktaM according original rgvedic agamas?
Nataradzha 4 years ago
Nataradzha, just by quoting random verses from the Vedas, you get no where. It works if your aim is just to feel great about yourself. Do you see the word Narayana, Krishna, Rama or Shiva in the Vedas? No. That is what I was talking about.
xmtz 4 years ago
NO? YES! Narayana, Krishna, Rama and Shiva in the Vedas? May be we should start with Narayana sUktaM -part of Rgveda? Or with ViSnu stanzas from Rgveda? Or from Upanishads-exmpl. GopalatapaniyopaniSad? can you look on context in which these words are placed also?
sac cid ananda rupaya
krsnaya klista karine
namo vedanta vedyaya
gurave buddhi sakSine
Why you are not looking to the truth? You speak about vedas-no qoutes. no simply answers to the questions-tonns of words, no even one answer...
Nataradzha 4 years ago
and- You cannot find in vedas word hinduism. You cannot proof your ideology. BUT When i proof my words-you call-"its random verses".And even more-after that you say, that there is no words Narayana, Krishna, Rama or Shiva in the vedas. Why? Ehat is the reason of such retarded behaviour? i can quote thosands verses with words Narayana, Krishna, Rama or Shiva from the vedas. You will say-oh,its just random. And after-again-there is no such words in the vedas...
sad story...
Nataradzha 4 years ago
Can you tell me what kind of music is being played in the background?
powerbuddy 4 years ago
The music was original. This track is form composition Gangass. Made by Aigars Gravers from Latvia (quite well known and famous musician in baltic states) specially for Ramadance (the name of one stage and musical project). Other track (for dancing with 2 swords) is from composition Avatara.
Nataradzha 4 years ago
very nice, i liked the ideia of recreating the danger of the battlefield. you seem very knolegeble(dont know the word) petty you're agressive and disrespectful on the other vids comments..thats the weakness of those who have power over the subject. anyways keep it up you're cool
nanatzu 4 years ago
its sad, if you feel disrespect and agressiveness in other vids coments what i have made. May be i am wrong, to go in this discussions, and may be it's not the best way how it was done. Yeah - i should be more carefull, cuz its so easy to cross the line. Thanks for advice.
Nataradzha 4 years ago
is that an indian martial art?
JVic1992 5 years ago
when this art was in use, there was no even such word in use - like "indian". But there was "aryans" - followers of vedic culture. Vedas - "knowledge" about all aspects of life. Word "india" was product of colonial ideologists...
Nataradzha 4 years ago
Wrong. I think you are using Thang Ta. It's a Meerut art native only to India. There is also nothing such as Aryans. The Aryan words comes for the Aryan Invasion Theory which holds no scientific or haplogroupic(DNA) evidence. So the vedas were written and practiced in India. The words Aryan means full of spirit.
nsreed 4 years ago
Why its wrong? Off course i and my sons using Manipuri Thang Ta in the line of how it was presented by Khilton Nonghmaithen. So, Indo Aryan its just therm what i am using. And you are not correct to immediately fight this word - aryan. This word was pure vedic therm. And off course - so called Aryan invasion theory misused this word, like Adolph Hitler misused swastika sign.
Nataradzha 4 years ago
And secondly, the British didn't put India's name. It was used by the Latin speakers to describe Sindhu(India) in Alexanders time. India was called "Indos". The word India comes from "Indos".
nsreed 4 years ago
So - off course, vedas was written and practiced in Bharata varsha, but do not minimize vedic culture - it was spreaded all over the Eurasia continent. So - therm Indo Aryan i am using with positive tendences, off course - more precise will be just "aryan". aryan - cuz Bhishma, Drona, brahmanas in Parasurama line, descendants of Rama - they was the best of aryans.
Nataradzha 4 years ago
Good on the theory. But, you have to understand Aryan is not a race. It never existed. There is no connection between Eruasia or baltic states and Indians. There never was. The rig veda specifically says Aryan is a light of vision. It's the spirit which fills any man. Everyone single ethnicity in this world can be aryan. It's not given to you at birth - you have to earn it!
nsreed 4 years ago
Nataradzha, again you dabble but are ignrorant. Bhishma, Drona and Parashurama were not descendants of Rama.
xmtz 4 years ago
descendants? read again, in the line - i count aryans
-
Bhisma,
Drona,
brahmanas in Parasurama line,
descendants of Rama
-
they was the best of aryans.
hmm. tendencies in your commenting are clear. when you will start to see the truth?
Nataradzha 4 years ago
Nataradzha, you are simply repeating the mistake you made earlier. Rama had only two kids - Lava and Kusha. Bhishma and Drona eons (Yugas) after Rama, none of them in the direct line of descent from Rama.
Besides, Rama was dark colored. He was probably a Dravidian hero absorbed into Aryan beliefs, just like Krishna. In your haste to steal Indian lore to inflate your silly 'Aryan' pride, you have not cared to read any of the ancient Sanskrit works.
xmtz 4 years ago
dear xmtz. please learn some grammatic (about meaning of - , -). So i am saying:
Bhisma is one of thr best aryans
Drona is one of the best aryans
bhrahmanas of the Parasurama line are the best aryanas
descendants of Rama are the best aryans
-i just count some of the best aryans without making them somehow other connected. can you understand? please.
Nataradzha 4 years ago
and also please, teach yourself to be more accurat.
1. i hav studied in sanskrit Mahabharata, Ramayana, Rgveda, Upanisads (Isha, Katha, Gopalatapani and etc.), Srimad Bhagavatam, Upadesamrita and so on., analizing different scientific translations.
2. Where in the vedas you will find therms "dravidian" and "indian"?
3. Where in Ramayana you will find that Rama was darkcolored?
4. Where in the vedas you will find, that aryans was "belivers"?
Nataradzha 4 years ago
and more - there are now such hinduism in reality - its just ideological assuption and political klishe, but in the reality - vedas has nothing with "hinduism". like "hinduism" has nothing with vedas (you will not find in vedas such a word)
Nataradzha 4 years ago
Nataradzha, To say that no such thing called Hinduism exists, is the height of idiocy. The Vedas are 4 of the main texts of that religion. Anyway, facts don't matter, only the fantasies u cook up to inflate ur Aryan pride matter to u.
If a donkey gets hold of books, it will just eat them & produce dung. When people like you get hold of ancient books, you just produce more ignorance & empty pride.
xmtz 4 years ago
1. just answer to the question - where in the vedic texts you can find that the vedas are sacred texts of "hinduism"?
2. in the vedas you can find great quantity of shlokas, where its postulated - thos who follow (accept) vedas are aryans.
3. and - if hinduism exist, than i am hindu. isn,it?
Nataradzha 4 years ago
Nataradzha, "India" is a name given by Greeks to that land. The Sanskrit works refer to that land as BhaaratVarsha. You claim great Sanskrit scholarship, yet you are ignorant of this simple fact.
You are truly an Aryan. Only an Aryan can dwell in such depths of ignorance yet have so much empty pride & egoism. This Aryan trait is very apparent even from the ancient Sanskrit books of Hinduism.
xmtz 4 years ago
1.Greeks was mlecchas, and not follovers of vedic culture. And BharatavarSa according vedic cosmography dos not mean indian subcontinent. teach yourself, please
2. and one more time - what dos it mean - ancient Sanskrit books of hinduism? If hinduism dosnt exist before, than how this ancient Sanskrit books can be books of hinduism? no logic.
3.vedic culture are based not on the books, but on the SRUTI-mutual tradition.
Nataradzha 4 years ago
lol the kid doesnt use his feet work very well does he
hunterkillers 5 years ago
watch out, dont step on that sword. Your dad is so stupid, he left the sharp sword on your feet.
ttt60 5 years ago
Its not stupidity. It is special. Usually battlefield is not covered with flower petals... And that was heavy viking sword (battle ready replica of 8 th century). I would like to have rajput heavy tulwar also - but its hard to get replicas from them in europe...
Nataradzha 4 years ago
Wow, that was truly great.
Quviyn 5 years ago
wassup buddy
rajendrabiswas 5 years ago