Added: 2 years ago
From: luv2increase
Views: 18,719
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (91)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I would like to now what your FPS is on this both the default settings and what you've gottne on here now. Running default I get Min:29-Max:40-Avg:33.807 from fraps and that is from the beginning of the demo to the end of it @ 1920x1080 4xAA standard from the demo itself.

  • 3 cards is an over kill. if i where you, i would put only one, i think only 1 is enough for the demo :/

  • how the hell did u fit 4 cards into your case...

  • Everything I can say about your system is....OMFG!!!

  • hes, right, you do need 3 to force that much aa!

    or 2 gtx480s

  • how can you use a 9800 for physx with ati cards? i thaught the drivers wouldnt allow it :S

  • The heck is the point if you need 6GB RAM and a tower that looks like it was shat out by the offspring of HAL & Chuck Norris.

    Sure, it looks good, but is it practical for your average user ? NOPE.

  • @Quipster99 I have a case that's just slightly larger than a normal one, with 5850 crossfire. It's more than practical enough.

  • crysis gameplay even look better than this fake wanna be shit lol

  • dx10 can render like this but yu cant notice there will be a little difference but people cannot find out...

  • lame.

  • You are able to have PhysX even with ATI cards?

  • @itchyfingers89 nope

  • That could easilly be made with DX9.

  • Ah such ignorance. You are clearly a graphical programmer. This isn't a graphical showcase you nard. It mimics a camera's aperture. Look at how it focuses in on the bugs head for instance and the depth of field. DX9 in NO way could do this. Hell, neither could 10.

  • You really think DX9 and 10 could not do this? LOL!

  • Not with the same FPS that you get on dedicated hardware, smartass. -.-

  • Dedicated DX9 hardware would do this easily. You are being brainwashed by AMD and Microsoft.

  • Then prove that DX9 can do tessellation WITH THE SAME PERFORMANCE as dedicated DX11 hardware can.

    You'd have to do those height map calculations on the CPU (floating point operations are slow as hell), and then send all those vertices to the GPU (bandwidth) each frame. Add that you'd have to implement your own LOD to not totally kill performance and you're pretty much screwed. Show me your code, man!

    And for your information, I own a GTX 295.

  • @theagentd

    Wanna know my code? Either use "bump mapping" or just have a higher poly count in your model. Look at Dirt 2 60% decrease and barely any difference.

  • nice, looks like 3dmark 03 or something

  • As with almost all games, the most annoying thing I have noticed is the shadow alignment is off. In this demo the shadows show that the lady bugs feet are not exactly touching the ground which takes away from the realism, then the clipping in the scene too. I get the point that this is DX11, and the detail is rich. However it is inaccurate.

  • I totally agree, shadows seem to need the most work.

  • Well thats real time for you.

  • I just read on Ati Sdk that the purpose of the demo was to showcase the complexity of Depth of field, so I guess the lod can be excused.

  • as always, it will take more years before games will look this good

  • OMFG PLASTIC FLOWERS! Because increasing texture quality on ladybugs is all-mighty the cure for unrealistic graphics! I think you lost about 18% of your DirectX version by bragging about normal mapping. Hands down to the rich uploader though, I'd kill for that spec. xd

  • relaxing music...haha oh and the video is uh...great. :P

  • @ZTR1760 Hey prick whats it to you what he uses it for? he paid for it so blow him you slut i hate haters man hatein on you for no reason cos you can buy the cards that he dreams of havein rofl btw nice vid propz and i have the ati 4870x2 nice cards but ati blows on drivers but they have been geting better at it

  • @ZTR1760

    fyi,

    I rarely play games. When I do, it is usually only simulation/racing games like FSX and Dirt 2.

    I do a lot of photo/video editing so a system like this helps a lot.

    Also, the new power saving imrprovements of the latest catalyst drivers are phenomenal. They system hardly uses any power at all in general use and browsing the web.

  • @luv2increase You are using 3 5870 for fsx and dirt? FSX is based on CPU not Graphic card, any 4870 with your processor wil run smotly maxed out. dirt 2 4890 is good enough...Another thing is, you dont need to run 24xAA in 1920x1080 because you do not see the difference over 8x due to the high number of pixels. Another thing is, Why you need 3x 5870 for photoshop? lol? If you want a video card to work you need a FirePro video card ! You made the biggest waste of money of your life.

  • @brenosilver Im saying 4000 series because I am used to those, but 5000 series with 1x 5850 you would maxed out this games...I spent 900 dollares on my computer (only case) and I max out every single game out there...Crysis 8xAA 16x AF 1920x1200 all features turned on, like yours...

  • @luv2increase FAIL GO PLAY COD

  • @luv2increase Lol do you call Dirt 2 a simulation? rofl

  • Fusion power will be out soon when they start harvesting the moon for Hydrogen 3, its alot safer and has no nucular waste like other fusion power reactors made. infact one ltr of hydrogen 3 can power the city of paris for 3 years... its powerfull shit haha

  • @ZTR1760 twat

  • sad thing is. in 4 years, this guys pc will be outdated and wont run any new game...

    just like those that bought 4x 8800gtx cards... haha its like some guy showing up to ICC in full t3 thinking there cool... haha for those wow ppl that understand... i quit wow! rawr

  • @r4z0r84

    In 4 years, I would expect DX12 to be out, but the games will still of course give the option to game in DX11 mode.

    The computer is meant to be future-proof for the next 3 years or really until DX12 is released.

  • your right, i do agree, the life of DX9 was WAY too long due to vista being a horrible OS, the life of DX11 will be much longer, theres no talk of DX12 anywhere on the net yet, i would expect DX11 to have a much longer run time with Win7 having no limits on hardware at all unlike all previous OS's

    atm i have a GTX275 and E8400 c2duo

    im sure it will last another year and a bit to be honest, the only computer that lasted 5 years was an acer veriton with a 9550 overclocked 120% lol

  • @r4z0r84 wot do u mean im still using a 9800 for the last 4 years....with every game out today....so my shit going to running well into the 2020's partner...hahahahhahahahah

  • @nikkademus1 lol i only just upgraded to two gtx275's and a phenom2 x6 only really upgraded for video editing and modding. but yeah your right the 9800gt (8800gtx core) is still able to play all current games and content due to the fact there all getting directly ported from ps3/xbox360 my old 9550 system can run wii games. so due to the new xbox720 coming out, games will finally advance in graphics and upgrades will actually be needed lol

  • @r4z0r84 i quit WoW as well...waiting for the old republuc..played it.its bad ass....

  • @r4z0r84 mainstream idiots buy consoles, they follow each other like sheep, like flies around shit, holding back technological advancement whilst at the same time they beg for better graphics.

    At least i haven't had to upgrade my PC for 4 years and i can boast better graphics and 3 times quicker load times when at my friends house with a £550 laptop lol

    He started oblivion on PS3 & I did on laptop, within 3 hours i was 20 mins ahead of him simply due to load times lol

  • Looks Soooooooooo real!

  • x3 5870? damn maybe even ps4 couldn't beat that

  • this guys specs are over kill. To even have three of those cards is slightly over kill. That would be the best that you could get. The 9800 as the phsycis card is just a waste.

  • @TFJotin

    The PhysX card died on me and was sent back to NewEgg.

    The computer is "NOT" overkill seeming that I game with the following setting with VSYNC always enabled with D3DOverrider Triple-Buffering always forced @ 1920x1080 resolution:

    OpenGL/DX9 = 24xSSAA, 16xAF, Highest In-Game Settings

    DX10/DX11 = 24xMSAA, 16xAF, Highest In-Game Settings

    I always also use the most graphically intensive game modifications available for games.

    Believe it or not, you "NEED" 3 x 5870s to do all this :)

  • @luv2increase

    I saw in a previous comment that you do video editing, and I hope that you are a god at it so you can use this computer to its full extent. This system is way overkill rofl, in so many ways xD

  • @luv2increase how do u play dx10 games? when i have dx11 ati card and nvidia physx card my games all freeze when there on dx10.it works when its on dx9 and dx11.

  • @luv2increase - I'm glad that you got that Computer and if they ever figure out how to put 6 cards ,I say Go for it , But there is no way the Human eye can tell the difference between 8xSSAA and 4xAF and 24xSSAA, 16xAF , Have a friend set a game with random settings while you are out of the Room , Come back in and I'll bet you won't guess correctly ...You got the $ ,get a gtx 460 for PhysXs! ... (I Just got one and I'm going to SLI them ,they are Great Cards for 200$ !!!)

  • @luv2increase overkill, i have phenom 1090t, 8 GB ddr1600 GTX 470 1208MB £35 seagate hard disk, runs all on max that i throw at it, rarely drops below monitor refresh rate (60fps) cost me £623

    unless if your making avatar 2 on one screen, watching 3D porn on another and finding and storing every prime number on your hard disk simultaneously you don't need it

    if you own a PC like that i think you owe the earth a couple 250 watt solar pannels & a tree or 2

  • How do you add a GPU for dedicated PhysX? That's awesome!

    Would something like a 9600 also suffice? Since I only have 1x 5850... maybe 2 later this year.

  • I'm not ashamed to admit that the visuals gave me goosebumps.

    Absolutely amazing.

  • shut up! thats a monster of a machine... i refuse to watch this video again... for the fifth time

  • Comment removed

  • look real-like motions, i love to see more

  • What was the average FPS here

  • I almost fell asleep... Congrats on creating the video that cures insomnia.

  • Actually, it would be the Demo. I can't take the credit for creating that LoL I wish I could though!

  • @shogo2040 lol

  • can you do a crysis video?

  • Yeah, I'll have one up by tomorrow.

  • Comment removed

  • You're using ATI tri-fire and an Nvidia card as a dedicated PhysX processing unit? I didn't even know you could do that. Where on earth did you get a case big enough to fit all that hardware? :P

  • The benefits of PhysX with the power of Tri-Fired 5870s! It doesn't get much better than this "at the moment" atleast until the Nvidia GT300 GPUs are released.

    Here is a link to a review of my case for this rig:

    w w w dot techpowerup dot c o m/reviews/Ikonik/Ra_X10_SIM

    It is the sharpest looking case on the market right now in my opinion. It actually has style and character rather than just being a big hunk of metal.

  • Please share with me how you can set up one card for graphics and one card for physx. I am building a rig and i am putting 1 radeaon HD 5870 and i already have a nvidia 9600 gso in my old rig i would like to use the nvidia for dedicated physx

  • w w w dot overclock dot n e t/graphics-cards-general/50830­5-howto-ati-nvidia-physx-guide­.html

    ENJOY!

  • whats your name on OCN?

  • For the most update and in-depth information on the Nvidia Fermi GF100 GPU, visit the following link. I will warn you now though that it is extremely technical. Enjoy!!!

    techreport dot c o m/articles.x/17815

  • i watched this in hd 1080p and.. WOW nice graphics :)) but at the start your video is a little bit lagging some people cant see this , but i can :)

  • @Zekanosmoke16

    Em i would say thats ur comp displaying 1080p lol. No lagging for me.

  • @Zekanosmoke16 And remember FRAPS

  • cant be my PC :) 8gb ram, 4870x2 last drivers, win7... so.. cant be...maybe its your eyevision , is fucked up a little bit, and you cant see it! :)

  • @Zekanosmoke16

    FRAPS!!!!!!

  • 5850 ftw...so much power and such little power consumption. little dragon kicks ass.

  • nvidia demos are somehow . . . better :p

    can't wait for gt300 to come out and see their demo =)

  • I heard the gt300 will still use DDR3 :(

  • no, they reduced bus width and increased memory speed using the GDDR5

  • That is a lie, they run on a 256 bit GDDR5 memory

  • Yes!, I'm glad I heard wrong. I would love too see what they're going to release.

  • It appears I was also wrong, as they run on a 384 bit bus.

  • Could you send me a link about the upcoming nvidia cards, cant seem to find one.

  • then it will be the same crap as a 4870

  • No, I was wrong, it runs on a 384 Bit bus.

  • @Dataacid

    Agreed!

  • this vdo is amazing so life like

  • cause most of em are in that crazy of having uselessly high fps numbers.

    NOTHING beats a game that runs at a perfect constant 60fps with vsync.

    I dont care if it hits 140 fps once in a while

    #1 its useless. Cant (arguably) see more than 60 fps

    #2 you will still get tearing

  • I love vsync ! perfect fluidity and no tearing !

  • I can't play games without Vsinc! It's great, and I don't know how some people go without it.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more