This negro president needs to read the bible. He professes to be a christian. The Bible says, "Thou shall not Kill". Obama declared war on Libya, and hundreds of thousands of women and children are being slaughtered by the "oil hungry" America and NATO.
As president, Obama needs to read books that will be helpful to his in his job, so why the hell would he waste his time with Sarah Palin's ghostwritten crap?
It sounds like he is about to say " I don't get the chance to read a lot these days" and he quickly catches himself and says "other than briefing books" What the heck is a briefing book..? I would think that he maybe gets reports to read, however it has been apparent from the past that most politicians don't read much of anything, as everything is written by advisors and what not and then dictated to them by word of mouth or audio visual presentation. He is very full of shit.
@mkeulr Are you hating on our president because you don't know what a briefing book is? A briefing book is a small booklet of what is to come and what he has to deal with in the situation ahead of him so he can prepare himself. So you think that because most politicians don't read much and get help from an advisor that all politicians are full of shit then you put Obama in the same category? And you got all of this off him deciding not to read Palins book? You have political experience? LMFAO
I love how he phrases his answer to the question... "well, I don't get a chance to read much of anything outside of my briefings... but you know, a lot of people think Sarah Palin is really interesting..."
Translation: "I have no interest in the book, and I don't personally find Sarah Palin interesting."
@totenkray: So you call Obama racist for what, exactly? Once again we have here another ignorant Tea-Bagger amazing us with his incisive reasoning! Care to try another one there, Cooter?
Once again Obama raises his racist side. Wont read Sarah's book because she's white, because she's a woman! Sexist! He sure can read passages of the Das Kapital to the his children every night but NO, he can't read Sarah Palin's horrible executed and obviously ghost written attempt at solidifying herself as a serious candidate. So sad.
This just goes on to show how inferior Obama is to Bush. President Bush read an average of 57 books a year while President; that's more than 400 books in his 8 years in the White House. Obama probably didn't have time to read a single book since being elected.
@LordKaisen You're right, it's like a flavor of icecream sorta. However just about every woman no matter of political leanings wears her glasses. Even Tina Fey changed up and despises the woman. How odd, so obviously nothing means anything it's just preference.
You can tell from Obama's expressions, disposition, mannerisms and body language, that even he understands that Sarah Palin plays an entertainment role in which to get to the top. The average viewer is stupid and doesn't realize the strategy played by both Bush and Palin. They are clever. Smart people with millions of dollars playing the role as if they are silly, stupid and goofy...only later to take over. It's all entertainment and haters really fall for the trap each time. Sarah is smart.
Last time we elected an 'entertainer' it didn't go so well. Nor the time before that, either.
Time to stop having actors and guys 'you wanna have a beer with' and actually go for people who have a grasp of politics and economics which transcends 'taxes suck' and 'oil is worth American lives'.
That's the problem with today's politics: thanks to agencies such as Fox, the red half of the nation are voting for salesmen, not civil servants.
@Lodatzor I'd like to see a scientist or Ph.D. get elected for once and not some fuckin' weak punk whose Harvard professors had to exaggerate his grades in order for him to pass courses under the liberal banner of Affirmative Action.
Can you prove any of the above, or is this another Kenyan birth certificate moment? ;)
Incidentally, it might be worth considering that many conservatives like to think that Obama is an Affirmative Action president, and would not have won by the margin he did were he not black. This is, in fact, true.
@Lodatzor Listen up Lodatzor; you can't can load questions on me. I studied formal logic at the university level and am not one of these dipshits who you are accustomed to debating with. Next, I am not a conspiracy theorist lunatic like Alex Jones. The CIA would never allow for Obama to be in control of the U.S. if it were not certain that he was American. I have more faith in my country than some. Third, Obama is a motherfucking HALF-white dude, so please keep it factual.
What, like... prove the things you're saying? Not exactly a 'trap', now, is it? More like a straightforward question. If you have no evidence, then, it's really not worth taking seriously.
Your logic studies should have made this clear to you.
"Third, Obama is a motherfucking HALF-white dude,"
Then he's not Black, is he, and so your Affirmative Action comments are utterly voided. Sorry. :)
@Lodatzor Sadly, the universe you live in is hinged upon provability of things that have already be proven. I do not need to prove anything. Things are what they are despite your denial of such facts and I am comfortable with that.
The Affirmative Action statement was facetious and for a smart guy, you should have been able to deduce that. What I indicated was/is valid and you know that.
Okay. So if I say that you are a two-headed alien from the planet Finux, then it's true, right? Surely you realize what you're saying...
"Things are what they are despite your denial of such facts"
No, see, things are not facts until there is compelling evidence and reason to call them such. Just you saying something that you want to be true does not make it true.
@Lodatzor You seem to have missed my decipherment of the psychology behind your dilemma. These things that you claim need to be proved by me, were proved by others long before my time.
Then why did you just claim that it was a fact? C'mon, man, you're not getting anywhere here by dodging the issue.
Either the comment was just an insult, in which case it can be dismissed as not worth taking seriously, or you feel it's true, in which case it can be evaluated in terms of merit.
Take your pick. I think you'll find you're not on the winning team in either event. :(
@Lodatzor I am always on the winning team. I have never dodged, avoided or evaded your questions. You simply do not like my responses. I work in the realm of fuzzy logic, where not everything is black and white. The half-white man (not an insult, simply the truth) attended Harvard on a scholarship. I was being facetious. You obviously have a deep-seated love and adoration for the former drug user with communist leanings, Barack Obama. His professors fudged his grades so he could slide--fact.
That's because your response does not contain the required information to be considered an answer. Therefore, as I correctly stated before, you have dodged the question because you are unwilling to answer it. This is elementary.
"I work in the realm of fuzzy logic,"
Ahhhh, where one can make shit up and then pretend that it is fact. Gotcha. ;)
"His professors fudged his grades so he could slide--fact."
It seems that you are the one with deep feelings about the man, and not complimentary ones. Otherwise, there is no reason whatsoever that you would make up this claim and then pretend that it is fact. you obviously hate the man so much that you are willing to lie about him.
That sucks for you, and your credibility. I, on the other hand, do not have to have some kind of deep admiration for him simply to call out bullshit.
@Lodatzor Not at all, but I see that you are an unequivocal troll judging by your thousands of posts in defense of a sorry ass so-called president who millions of good, hardworking Americans have come to see is nothing but a fraud and a con man. You defend communism, extreme socialism and persist in your denial of reality around you. The only troll around here that I see is you.
You see, what constitutes a troll is an inability to form relevant comments, and an inability to back up anything they say, most usually for the express purpose of derailing the conversation so that they can disguise the fact that what they have said is utter bullshit.
@Lodatzor Actually, I deciphered your nonsense quite some time ago. You are merely an anal and bitter man. In your book, a troll is anyone who does not agree with your libertine opinions. I can tell that you are a very lonely man and that you spend most of your days arguing about nothing with no valid points about anything. You speak elliptically, talk in circles, cry about provability and accuse people of evading your superficial questions and so forth. Your issues bespeak misery.
Why? Because I ask evidence of your to back up a claim which sounds like the typical, hate-fuelled bullshit which emanates daily from the right-wing slur-fountains on Fox? Good one. ;)
"You speak elliptically, talk in circles,"
Sure, chief, because direct questions are oh-so-circular. You coward. At least have the guts to admit that you simply do not want to debate me.
@Lodatzor Now you have gone delusional. Your assertion and CLAIM (false mind you) was that I admitted that I would not debate you. I know you want to cry, but I will continue to debate you on behalf of the Right Wing and Conservative Republicans everywhere. I have NEVER been a coward you imbecile. Name a new topic and we can go at it. How about gays in the military?
@Lodatzor For one, this has nothing to do with what I originally wrote. Two, Obama is a twit. He doesn't listen to the majority of the people in this country. Healthcare. 35% of people backed that idea. We don't want gov't run healthcare. Arizona's immigration law has almost 70% support and that number grows daily. Yet Obama is letting Mexico sue Arizona, and Obama himself is planning on thaking it to the Supreme Court? Hilarious. To be honest, I'm surprised Obama can read at all.
"For one, this has nothing to do with what I originally wrote."
Sure it does. You were implying that Obama will not read Palin's book because it is an opposing viewpoint founded on fact not feeling. I merely reminded you that Palin is the very last person you should be holing up as a poster-child for such criteria.
Simple.
"He doesn't listen to the majority of the people in this country"
You mean, he doesn't listen to Fox, rather. 65% of the country wanted the Public Option.
No, YOU don't want it. Most people actually do. This is why liars in the GoP and on Fox have to make things up to scare people about it, such as death panels and government funded abortions. None of it was true. They wouldn't have to do so if they knew people weren't liking the idea in the first place.
Or, let me guess, most of the the people are not Real Americans, right?
"Obama himself is planning on thaking it to the Supreme Court? Hilarious"
Ah, so you don't believe in the Constitution. Good to know. Apparently the notion of 'the rights of the minority cannot be trampled by the will of the majority' is hilarious to you.
That's rather telling.
So, tell me again how this was nothing to do with what you said?
@Lodatzor Obama is the poster child for demoRATS? You guys are fucked then. He is this decade's Jimmy Carter. He is spending us into oblivion, and inflation is going to skyrocket. Sarah Palin is not my poster child. Ronald Reagan is. I'm actually glad that Obama was elected. He is going to ruin the democratic party so that we can get another Reagan. Reagan had this country moving the right way. 60% of people want the healthcare bill repealed. That shows that Obama doesn't care what we think....
But, go right ahead and prove me wrong, if you can. I bet you wont, though. I have a feeling you're going to just start getting boring and insulting.
Incidentally, you should really not pay any attention to Fox. You see, only 35% of the nation were happy with the healthcare bill, it's true. But, er, over half of the ones who were not were unhappy because it did not go far ENOUGH.
This places the people who do not want healthcare coverage in the severe minority. Bet they never told you that. ;)
@Lodatzor Also, and you may find this funny.....Fox has higher ratings than any other news outlet in this country. I watch 3 different news outlets. I watch because I like to be informed on all sides. Fox doesn't always get it right, but they get it right more often than the other two news oulets combined. I was at an event and viewed it on all three news outlets and Fox was the only one that got it right...Don't be liberal AND stupid..I know it's hard. I'm just asking you to try....
"Fox has higher ratings than any other news outlet in this country."
I find it disturbing, but not all that surprising. After all, McDonalds has higher customer volume than an Italian restaurant, but one could not possibly say that the food at McD's is better.
That's the difference. You like fast food information. ;)
"Don't be liberal AND stupid.."
Nyeh nyeh nyeh, I could fire the same thing back at you, but I have better things to do, and better arguments on my side. :)
@Lodatzor Fox represents what the MAJORITY of the people in this country believe. They present facts and analysis from both sides of the issues. Liberalism is a disease that is killing this country faster than the Global Warming myth. Impeach Obama. He is the worst president ever. He is worse than Carter and Bush jr. His far left views are tearing this country apart at it's core. I can't wait til 2012 and he is out of office....
For... what exactly? For getting unemployment under control, for managing to get through a healthcare bill that, while not great, is still better than what we had before, for continuing the same policies in Afghanistan as his predecessors, for giving you a tax cut....
For what, exactly?
You don't even know why you don't like him. You've just been told not to, because he's a political adversary of your teachers at Fox. Sheesh, you're a cartoon.
Well, seeing as Carter wasn't that bad, and Bush Jnr was an inept idiot spouting the same ideology as you, I wonder what your standards are.
LOL. I bet you still think that Reagan was a GOOD president, don't you?
"His far left views are tearing this country apart at it's core."
Yeah, because having been in office for less than two years, he MUST be responsible for the problems caused by the last 30 years of right-wing leaning. Must be.
You really do not understand do you, on any level, how the problems this country faces now are due to the insatiable and incessant move to the right that has occurred ever since Reagan introduced the odious and utterly disastrous notion of 'trickle-down economics'.
More hours, less wages, less securities, less regulation, more taxes for the middle class, less taxes for the rich, less protections under the law, less accountability...
THAT's what your idiotic brethren have done to our 'core'.
And because you do not understand any of these things, you listen to Glenn Beck and Sean Hannity, who do not understand them either, when they harp on about Progressivism killing the country, etc.
Failing, of course, to realize that Progressivism is what has BUILT America. Otherwise black people would still be property, women would not be able to vote and children would be working in factories.
@Lodatzor The Democratic Party started the KKK and instituted the Jim Crow laws in the South. Progressives are fascists in disguise and have done nothing to advance African Americans.
"The Democratic Party started the KKK and instituted the Jim Crow laws in the South."
Yeah, and who all transferred to the Republican party in the 50s and 60s when the Democratic party became liberal. Your attacks are 60 years out of date. ;) But do try again, won't you?
"Progressives are fascists in disguise and have done nothing to advance African Americans."
Except for all that Civil Rights malarky, which you seem to so conveniently forget. ;)
Let's contrast this with conservative contributions, which include the Confederates, the Redeemers (you know, those Jim Crow guys) and today's insistence that racism is something that should be constitutionally protected.
You're not really making yourself look informed here, you do realize that, right? ;)
Incidentally, perhaps you are unfamiliar with what fascism actually IS.
In the words of Robert Paxton, fascism is:
"a form of political behavior marked by obsessive preoccupation with community decline, humiliation or victimhood and by compensatory cults of unity, energy and purity, in which a mass-based party of committed nationalist militants, working in uneasy, but effective collaboration with traditional elites, abandons democratic liberties and pursues with redemptive violence... (cont)
"...(cont)...and without ethical or legal restraints goals of internal cleansing and external expansion."
Hmmm, step forward Beck and Limbaugh.
You see, chief, you've been drinking the Kool Aid for so long that you believe it is wine, when any cursory study of the matters at hand reveal quite the opposite of your beliefs. It is the right-wing extremities who preach the dogma of fascism, ever and anon dressing it up as some form of 'patriotism' instead of the puerile tribalism that it truly is.
But you go right ahead. You just wow me with your understanding of socialism, communism and fascism , which thus far you have indicated you do not grasp in the slightest.
In short, prove that you're not just a troll who gets his material from Sean Hannity and Michael 'Savage' Wiener.
@Lodatzor Have you even watched Fox at all? Almost every show they have brings in liberals to put in their two cents. Then they get cut down. Bill, Sean, Glenn, they all have liberals on. " Man made" global warming IS a myth. It is a business. Al Gore is in charge of numerous businesses that profit from "global warming." His net worth before his involvement? Around 9 million. His net worth now? Approx 93 million. Coincidence? You liberals just keep being sheep.
Well of course. That's how I know they're full of crap.
"Almost every show they have brings in liberals to put in their two cents."
And how many liberal HOSTS do they have, hmm? You see, bringing someone on whose mic you can cut, and who you can talk about after they have gone without giving them a chance to reply... does not count. That's what we call propaganda. ;)
Sorry, Fair and Balanced is exactly what Fox aint.
Which must be why the vast majority of the scientific community declare that it is true, and only TV weathermen who would have to admit they'd been wrong for 40 years say that is is false.
"Al Gore is in charge of numerous businesses that profit from "global warming.""
Name one. Go for it. And see, if you can, how many of those are NON-profit organization. You'll find the number nears 100%. ;)
Or we could keep on paying attention to the fact, not listening to the ramblings of men who declare themselves to be self-taught at the library 'where books are free' (when he came out with that one I nearly laughed myself silly).
@Lodatzor CNN, MSNBC, AND ABC have tons of conservatives hosts now don't they? They are full of liberal spin. Global Springs Networks is one company that Al Gore has put investments in that directly profits from GloBULL Warming. And actually, the "vast majority of scientists," as you put it, do not buy into the man made part of global warming. The Earth's climate is always shifting. How do you think we have had so many ice ages and then that ice mysteriously melts on it's own?
And the overwhelming evidence suggests that it is doing so at an abnormal rate induces by human activity. It's really rather concrete.
And, finally, as to CNN, MSNBC etc, you'll find that THOSE networks do not disguise their bias, which is actually significantly less than Fox News', who of course try and pretend that they have none at all.
Fox News is a lie. It's pretty simple, and pretty easy to point out.
@Lodatzor It is obvious that the wool is pull so far over your eyes that you can't bear to see the truth. That is fine. You stay in your little liberal, ideological bubble safe and sound. I promise not to gloat too much when we win back the house in November, The white House and Senate in 2012, and when the earth doesn't melt from people driving SUVs and smoking cigarettes. Oh and most of the scientists that agree with man made global warming are NOT climate scientists...
"It is obvious that the wool is pull so far over your eyes"
blah blah blah. What's obvious is that you have had no reply to any of my assertions, data or facts, and are engaging in the same tired old insult-war which I predicted you would.
"global warming are NOT climate scientists..."
Utter bullshit. But do provide some evidence, won't you, like I did?
You do realize that, like Evolution, it is only redneck America that doubts it? Everyone else prefers facts. ;)
@Lodatzor climatedepot . com There are tones of useful links for you to meander through on this website. and some interesting things on this one as well aproundtable . org
Well, I'll give you credit for producing two links.
However, I will also point out that your first link contains not a whit of scientific insight, nor indeed does it detail any scientists who agree with you. It appears to consist of photoshopped images made in order to make sarcastic and fraudulent advertising campaigns.
Alas, sir, this is still not evidence. ;) It is merely poor wit, in the same vein as those posters showing Obama as a voodoo doctor. :P
And as for the second link, I nearly burst out laughing. So, your site, which by the way appears to have no link in any way to the climate 'debate' is an organization "founded in 1980 and is dedicated to restoring Judeo-Christian principles to American public policy."
In other words, applying religious doctrine to politics! Wow, guess you people have no regard for the 1st Amendment, eh?
You merely cemented my statement that the only people denying climate change are Evolution-deniers.
@Lodatzor You know you love FOXNews. It's obvious from your baseless accusations against the news network. You are clearly infatuated with the FOXNews staff. BTW, if your ideas are as on point as you think they are, why do you only have 25 subscribers to your circus clown channel? Surely, if you were so accurate with regard to all your pseudo-intellectualisms you would have far more subscribers by now at your ripe old age of 29 in all is FAKE wisdom. U r simply an antagonist and inaccurate.
So, once again, where is your evidence for the claim you made about Obama's grades being fudged? I notice you still lack the courage (not to mention the evidence itself) to respond to that point. ;)
When you would rather engage in 'conjecture' about another person rather than discuss the matter at hand, it's a pretty sterling indication that you're full of crap. That, or you're just trolling.
But, I mean, I understand why you do it. You fairly obviously think that this debate is a 'rap battle', where being the loudest and most repetitive ensures victory.
Sadly, that type of contest is for the stage, to assess lingual dexterity and showmanship. Down here in the discussion trenches, facts and logic trump 'conjecture'.
But do keep trying the debate equivalent of calling me a 'punk' or a 'faggot'. You make yourself look silly, which is mildly entertaining. ;)
@Lodatzor Why would the so-called president have an issue with his transcripts being released from Columbia college if he had such a "stellar" performance having graduated at the "top" of his Harvard class? Maybe because he is hiding something like his drug addictions.
Or maybe not a single presidential candidate has ever submitted (or been asked for) such information before, and his campaign decided it would be an invasion of privacy and unduly dignifying a line of pointless conjecture?
So, the best you have is speculation on someone's motives in not handing out schoolwork, in a deliberate attempt to paint a picture of conspiracy.
That's not evidence, sir. Find me a statement or a document which reports or shows fudging.
I won't read her book. I try to read stuff that is either good fiction or intelligent and relevant, not some ignorant trash written for people with the depth of a teeny bopper rock fan.
@moediggity28 So you entirely missed his microexpression of contempt everytime he mentions her or the Republican Party? Even if he's kissing her ass, he's lying about his true feelings.
the real question is whether palin will read or if she has read her own book....it's an established fact that she didn't write it....and we know she doesn't read anything....as exposed by katie couric....so i think someone should quiz palin over the contents of her own book
you do know unemployment is 10.2% right? you do know the stimulus package was a flop? you do know obama wants to all of a sudden have a "job summit" since unemployment is suppose to rise, right?
that's right, you shouldn't be reading books. You should start doing your job. Or you know what since you're not doing anything, read Palin's book and learn something.
Or maybe YOU should try reading a book period. It starts with learning the alphabet, then learning what letters make what sounds when you put them together, then you start sonding out words, and what do you know...you might be able to read too. I'll bet you suck more at your job...if you can even keep one.
I don't have a job yet. I guess it's up to you to believe this, but I am studying to be a doctor. Stop by at Wayne State in Detroit and we'll chat about this. I would love to know more about why you're supporting this person.
Our country became great and amazing because it was founded on strong, honest, Christian principles. That is what we need to get back to and THAT is what Palin stands for.
she's a fraud plain and simple.. i hope she runs in 2012 and gets beat just like McCain did & i hope that when she is consoling the crowd they boo again like the ignorant sore losers they are.. Bump Palin & her book. if she won she would probably quit in the middle of it just like she did her mayoral job.. what a bonafide loser
So Palin's dishonesty and corruption are Christian principles too? Death panels, abuse of power, 150K in illegal campaign funds for clothes? It is sad that a future doctor should have such a weak grasp of history that he can only babble in talk radio childish bromides.
"I aint have time to reading the thoughts of that crazyass bitch. She didn't write the damn thing anyway since she can't even put a sentence together. Plus her daughter is a whore"
Something I've noticed is that Sarah Palin has become a sort of celebrity, with a book, and is being supported by some for President in 2012. Isn't this the criticism thrown towards President Obama when he was running and still today. He was just some celebrity type figure with a book?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The Associated Press has assigned 11 reporters to fact check 432 pages of Palin's book. The AP asiigned zero reporters to fact check Obama's, Ted Kennedy's and Bill and Hillary Clinton's books.
Speaks volumes of what political party the AP takes it's orders from.
I doubt even Palin read her own book. Know why? She can't read.
jessemaurais 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This negro president needs to read the bible. He professes to be a christian. The Bible says, "Thou shall not Kill". Obama declared war on Libya, and hundreds of thousands of women and children are being slaughtered by the "oil hungry" America and NATO.
MsPamAnn 6 months ago
Ironically, the Palin e-mails described how much she admired Obama and his issues. Shes lame.
gcord21 6 months ago
I heard it was a pop up book.
Cleatusbodean 7 months ago 3
Class act! What a man.
GoldcardAsia 7 months ago
i probably wouldn't read Palin's book either, but then again im quite intrigued by science fiction
whatsgoingon07 7 months ago
Wise Choice Pres. Obama! Most of our children have already read Scara Pailin's book: "Green Eggs & Ham"! Re-Titled by her Creativity:
"Green Dems & Ham"! ---> "I do not like Green Dems & Ham, I do not like them Sam-I-Am!
I do not like them in a tree, I do not like them smarter than me!
I do not like them with a Mouse...I do not like them in the White House"!
I do not like the way they act...I do not like them if their BLACK!
MrsD7777 7 months ago
Why would he want to waste him time and read that book he is better off reading the funny pages
payneicecold3000 9 months ago 4
its ok obama, sarah palin hasnt read her book either.
tuseroni 9 months ago 10
As president, Obama needs to read books that will be helpful to his in his job, so why the hell would he waste his time with Sarah Palin's ghostwritten crap?
Kirke182 9 months ago
what he meant to say is, "I don't have time to read that because I have too many real books to read."
Hecante 10 months ago
Probably wont? why not? It may state that Oil might bring the debt down.
gunniesack 11 months ago
It sounds like he is about to say " I don't get the chance to read a lot these days" and he quickly catches himself and says "other than briefing books" What the heck is a briefing book..? I would think that he maybe gets reports to read, however it has been apparent from the past that most politicians don't read much of anything, as everything is written by advisors and what not and then dictated to them by word of mouth or audio visual presentation. He is very full of shit.
mkeulr 11 months ago
@mkeulr Are you hating on our president because you don't know what a briefing book is? A briefing book is a small booklet of what is to come and what he has to deal with in the situation ahead of him so he can prepare himself. So you think that because most politicians don't read much and get help from an advisor that all politicians are full of shit then you put Obama in the same category? And you got all of this off him deciding not to read Palins book? You have political experience? LMFAO
808Hea 8 months ago 3
Barack Obama apparently has enough time to follow dan brown on twitter...
cksugdad 11 months ago
I love how he phrases his answer to the question... "well, I don't get a chance to read much of anything outside of my briefings... but you know, a lot of people think Sarah Palin is really interesting..."
Translation: "I have no interest in the book, and I don't personally find Sarah Palin interesting."
instereovideos 1 year ago
@instereovideos lol...great quip!
toeteeguy 11 months ago
I don't blame him, I probably wont read Sarah Palin's book. :3
TT99976 1 year ago
@TT99976
"probably" is too nice of a word. I would say "I will NEVAAA EVAAR read that biatch's book, what? you think I'm nut?" to the interviewer
panterafist 1 year ago
0:34 caught himself, lol. Fox would've ran with that for a week. "Top headline tonight, President Obama doesn't know how to read".
Baseball5030 1 year ago
@Baseball5030 haha those bastard at FOX always spinning words around
dearjunehardcore 1 year ago
What a gracious answer. The man has Class!
canman67 1 year ago 31
@canman67 Yes he does, and those who do also recognize it.
amitysea 1 year ago
Sarah Palin should get raped by Lady Gaga......
AssholeRick69 1 year ago 13
@totenkray: So you call Obama racist for what, exactly? Once again we have here another ignorant Tea-Bagger amazing us with his incisive reasoning! Care to try another one there, Cooter?
BabyRay55 1 year ago
Once again Obama raises his racist side. Wont read Sarah's book because she's white, because she's a woman! Sexist! He sure can read passages of the Das Kapital to the his children every night but NO, he can't read Sarah Palin's horrible executed and obviously ghost written attempt at solidifying herself as a serious candidate. So sad.
totenkray 1 year ago
@totenkray No, I'm pretty sure he's not reading Palin's book because she's a moron. If Lil Wayne wrote a book, he probably wouldn't read that either.
Hecante 10 months ago
I definitely wont be reading that crap !
DRmayybee 1 year ago
This just goes on to show how inferior Obama is to Bush. President Bush read an average of 57 books a year while President; that's more than 400 books in his 8 years in the White House. Obama probably didn't have time to read a single book since being elected.
asd25471 1 year ago
@asd25471
Coloring books don't count, so Bush's average drops considerably when that's factored in.
RollingOrmond 1 year ago
i think women like her because she's a woman. And I think guys like her for her looks. Sounds raw, but somehow instinctively that's how it feels.
LordKaisen 1 year ago
@LordKaisen You're right, it's like a flavor of icecream sorta. However just about every woman no matter of political leanings wears her glasses. Even Tina Fey changed up and despises the woman. How odd, so obviously nothing means anything it's just preference.
totenkray 1 year ago
You can tell from Obama's expressions, disposition, mannerisms and body language, that even he understands that Sarah Palin plays an entertainment role in which to get to the top. The average viewer is stupid and doesn't realize the strategy played by both Bush and Palin. They are clever. Smart people with millions of dollars playing the role as if they are silly, stupid and goofy...only later to take over. It's all entertainment and haters really fall for the trap each time. Sarah is smart.
YFLOInternational 1 year ago
@YFLOInternational
...but shockingly unqualified.
Last time we elected an 'entertainer' it didn't go so well. Nor the time before that, either.
Time to stop having actors and guys 'you wanna have a beer with' and actually go for people who have a grasp of politics and economics which transcends 'taxes suck' and 'oil is worth American lives'.
That's the problem with today's politics: thanks to agencies such as Fox, the red half of the nation are voting for salesmen, not civil servants.
Lodatzor 1 year ago
@Lodatzor I'd like to see a scientist or Ph.D. get elected for once and not some fuckin' weak punk whose Harvard professors had to exaggerate his grades in order for him to pass courses under the liberal banner of Affirmative Action.
YFLOInternational 1 year ago
@YFLOInternational
Can you prove any of the above, or is this another Kenyan birth certificate moment? ;)
Incidentally, it might be worth considering that many conservatives like to think that Obama is an Affirmative Action president, and would not have won by the margin he did were he not black. This is, in fact, true.
Had he been white, he would have won by MORE.
Lodatzor 1 year ago
@Lodatzor Listen up Lodatzor; you can't can load questions on me. I studied formal logic at the university level and am not one of these dipshits who you are accustomed to debating with. Next, I am not a conspiracy theorist lunatic like Alex Jones. The CIA would never allow for Obama to be in control of the U.S. if it were not certain that he was American. I have more faith in my country than some. Third, Obama is a motherfucking HALF-white dude, so please keep it factual.
YFLOInternational 1 year ago
@YFLOInternational
"you can't can load questions on me"
What, like... prove the things you're saying? Not exactly a 'trap', now, is it? More like a straightforward question. If you have no evidence, then, it's really not worth taking seriously.
Your logic studies should have made this clear to you.
"Third, Obama is a motherfucking HALF-white dude,"
Then he's not Black, is he, and so your Affirmative Action comments are utterly voided. Sorry. :)
Lodatzor 1 year ago
@Lodatzor Sadly, the universe you live in is hinged upon provability of things that have already be proven. I do not need to prove anything. Things are what they are despite your denial of such facts and I am comfortable with that.
The Affirmative Action statement was facetious and for a smart guy, you should have been able to deduce that. What I indicated was/is valid and you know that.
YFLOInternational 1 year ago
@YFLOInternational
"I do not need to prove anything."
Okay. So if I say that you are a two-headed alien from the planet Finux, then it's true, right? Surely you realize what you're saying...
"Things are what they are despite your denial of such facts"
No, see, things are not facts until there is compelling evidence and reason to call them such. Just you saying something that you want to be true does not make it true.
This is called logic.
Lodatzor 1 year ago
@Lodatzor You seem to have missed my decipherment of the psychology behind your dilemma. These things that you claim need to be proved by me, were proved by others long before my time.
YFLOInternational 1 year ago
@YFLOInternational
Then why are you unable to direct me towards their work?
You see, it was proven that you are a two-headed alien from Finux, long before my time.
Lodatzor 1 year ago
"The Affirmative Action statement was facetious"
Then why did you just claim that it was a fact? C'mon, man, you're not getting anywhere here by dodging the issue.
Either the comment was just an insult, in which case it can be dismissed as not worth taking seriously, or you feel it's true, in which case it can be evaluated in terms of merit.
Take your pick. I think you'll find you're not on the winning team in either event. :(
Lodatzor 1 year ago
@Lodatzor I am always on the winning team. I have never dodged, avoided or evaded your questions. You simply do not like my responses. I work in the realm of fuzzy logic, where not everything is black and white. The half-white man (not an insult, simply the truth) attended Harvard on a scholarship. I was being facetious. You obviously have a deep-seated love and adoration for the former drug user with communist leanings, Barack Obama. His professors fudged his grades so he could slide--fact.
YFLOInternational 1 year ago
@YFLOInternational
"You simply do not like my responses"
That's because your response does not contain the required information to be considered an answer. Therefore, as I correctly stated before, you have dodged the question because you are unwilling to answer it. This is elementary.
"I work in the realm of fuzzy logic,"
Ahhhh, where one can make shit up and then pretend that it is fact. Gotcha. ;)
"His professors fudged his grades so he could slide--fact."
Nope; claim. Sorry, you lose.
Lodatzor 1 year ago
It seems that you are the one with deep feelings about the man, and not complimentary ones. Otherwise, there is no reason whatsoever that you would make up this claim and then pretend that it is fact. you obviously hate the man so much that you are willing to lie about him.
That sucks for you, and your credibility. I, on the other hand, do not have to have some kind of deep admiration for him simply to call out bullshit.
Easy. :) Sorry dude, you're on the losing team.
Lodatzor 1 year ago
@Lodatzor Wrong.
YFLOInternational 1 year ago
@Lodatzor Wrong again, I win.
YFLOInternational 1 year ago
@YFLOInternational
Ah, so you're just a troll.
How disappointing.
Lodatzor 1 year ago
Comment removed
YFLOInternational 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Lodatzor Not at all, but I see that you are an unequivocal troll judging by your thousands of posts in defense of a sorry ass so-called president who millions of good, hardworking Americans have come to see is nothing but a fraud and a con man. You defend communism, extreme socialism and persist in your denial of reality around you. The only troll around here that I see is you.
YFLOInternational 1 year ago
@YFLOInternational
That is because you are a very silly person.
You see, what constitutes a troll is an inability to form relevant comments, and an inability to back up anything they say, most usually for the express purpose of derailing the conversation so that they can disguise the fact that what they have said is utter bullshit.
Therefore, you are a troll. :)
Woohoo! Logic FTW!
Lodatzor 1 year ago
Comment removed
YFLOInternational 1 year ago
@Lodatzor Actually, I deciphered your nonsense quite some time ago. You are merely an anal and bitter man. In your book, a troll is anyone who does not agree with your libertine opinions. I can tell that you are a very lonely man and that you spend most of your days arguing about nothing with no valid points about anything. You speak elliptically, talk in circles, cry about provability and accuse people of evading your superficial questions and so forth. Your issues bespeak misery.
YFLOInternational 1 year ago
@YFLOInternational
"You are merely an anal and bitter man."
Why? Because I ask evidence of your to back up a claim which sounds like the typical, hate-fuelled bullshit which emanates daily from the right-wing slur-fountains on Fox? Good one. ;)
"You speak elliptically, talk in circles,"
Sure, chief, because direct questions are oh-so-circular. You coward. At least have the guts to admit that you simply do not want to debate me.
Lodatzor 1 year ago
@Lodatzor Now you have gone delusional. Your assertion and CLAIM (false mind you) was that I admitted that I would not debate you. I know you want to cry, but I will continue to debate you on behalf of the Right Wing and Conservative Republicans everywhere. I have NEVER been a coward you imbecile. Name a new topic and we can go at it. How about gays in the military?
YFLOInternational 1 year ago
@YFLOInternational
"Name a new topic and we can go at it."
No, we shall stick with this one, until it has been resolved. If you do not, then you merely prove that you are a coward.
Provide evidence that Obama's professors fudged his grades. Do it now, and stop trying to change the subject because you would rather cry and whine.
Otherwise, the claim is false and you reveal yourself as merely a troll. It's that simple.
Lodatzor 1 year ago
Ron Paul for 2012
SuperKing069 1 year ago
@SuperKing069
ron paul?! the fuck?!
Lonewolf6565 1 year ago
Ron Paul for 2012, fuck you Obama and Palin
SuperKing069 1 year ago
I doubt hes got time to read books.
anthonym267 1 year ago
Sarah Palin cant read Obamas books
fraterlucifer888 1 year ago
Sarah can't tell anybody what she reads!
~~
Everything! Anything!
canycme 1 year ago
Obama wont read her book because Liberals can't stand to see opposing views, especially when they are founded on fact, and not feeling.
Jazepentz 1 year ago
@Jazepentz
What, like winking and mispronouncing 'nuclear'? Good one. ;)
Lodatzor 1 year ago
@Lodatzor For one, this has nothing to do with what I originally wrote. Two, Obama is a twit. He doesn't listen to the majority of the people in this country. Healthcare. 35% of people backed that idea. We don't want gov't run healthcare. Arizona's immigration law has almost 70% support and that number grows daily. Yet Obama is letting Mexico sue Arizona, and Obama himself is planning on thaking it to the Supreme Court? Hilarious. To be honest, I'm surprised Obama can read at all.
Jazepentz 1 year ago
@Jazepentz
"For one, this has nothing to do with what I originally wrote."
Sure it does. You were implying that Obama will not read Palin's book because it is an opposing viewpoint founded on fact not feeling. I merely reminded you that Palin is the very last person you should be holing up as a poster-child for such criteria.
Simple.
"He doesn't listen to the majority of the people in this country"
You mean, he doesn't listen to Fox, rather. 65% of the country wanted the Public Option.
Lodatzor 1 year ago
@Lodatzor
"We don't want gov't run healthcare."
No, YOU don't want it. Most people actually do. This is why liars in the GoP and on Fox have to make things up to scare people about it, such as death panels and government funded abortions. None of it was true. They wouldn't have to do so if they knew people weren't liking the idea in the first place.
Or, let me guess, most of the the people are not Real Americans, right?
Lodatzor 1 year ago
"Obama himself is planning on thaking it to the Supreme Court? Hilarious"
Ah, so you don't believe in the Constitution. Good to know. Apparently the notion of 'the rights of the minority cannot be trampled by the will of the majority' is hilarious to you.
That's rather telling.
So, tell me again how this was nothing to do with what you said?
Lodatzor 1 year ago
@Lodatzor Obama is the poster child for demoRATS? You guys are fucked then. He is this decade's Jimmy Carter. He is spending us into oblivion, and inflation is going to skyrocket. Sarah Palin is not my poster child. Ronald Reagan is. I'm actually glad that Obama was elected. He is going to ruin the democratic party so that we can get another Reagan. Reagan had this country moving the right way. 60% of people want the healthcare bill repealed. That shows that Obama doesn't care what we think....
Jazepentz 1 year ago
@Jazepentz
"Obama is the poster child for demoRATS?"
Oh look, a bad pun. So, you vote Repugnican, I take it? See how pointless these cheap jibes are?
"Sarah Palin is not my poster child. Ronald Reagan is."
Then you are quite the fool, because Ronald Reagan is the one who spent this county into oblivion. How embarrassing for you.
"Reagan had this country moving the right way."
Yeah, as if Reaganomics didn't cause the recession. :P
"60% of people want the healthcare bill repealed."
Liar.
Lodatzor 1 year ago
But, go right ahead and prove me wrong, if you can. I bet you wont, though. I have a feeling you're going to just start getting boring and insulting.
Incidentally, you should really not pay any attention to Fox. You see, only 35% of the nation were happy with the healthcare bill, it's true. But, er, over half of the ones who were not were unhappy because it did not go far ENOUGH.
This places the people who do not want healthcare coverage in the severe minority. Bet they never told you that. ;)
Lodatzor 1 year ago
@Lodatzor Also, and you may find this funny.....Fox has higher ratings than any other news outlet in this country. I watch 3 different news outlets. I watch because I like to be informed on all sides. Fox doesn't always get it right, but they get it right more often than the other two news oulets combined. I was at an event and viewed it on all three news outlets and Fox was the only one that got it right...Don't be liberal AND stupid..I know it's hard. I'm just asking you to try....
Jazepentz 1 year ago
@Jazepentz
"Fox has higher ratings than any other news outlet in this country."
I find it disturbing, but not all that surprising. After all, McDonalds has higher customer volume than an Italian restaurant, but one could not possibly say that the food at McD's is better.
That's the difference. You like fast food information. ;)
"Don't be liberal AND stupid.."
Nyeh nyeh nyeh, I could fire the same thing back at you, but I have better things to do, and better arguments on my side. :)
Lodatzor 1 year ago
@Lodatzor Fox represents what the MAJORITY of the people in this country believe. They present facts and analysis from both sides of the issues. Liberalism is a disease that is killing this country faster than the Global Warming myth. Impeach Obama. He is the worst president ever. He is worse than Carter and Bush jr. His far left views are tearing this country apart at it's core. I can't wait til 2012 and he is out of office....
Jazepentz 1 year ago
@Jazepentz
"Fox represents what the MAJORITY of the people in this country believe"
Suuuure they do. That's why the majority of people get their information from the internet now instead of cable news. ;)
"They present facts and analysis from both sides of the issues"
Like, er, when? How many liberals can you name on Fox's line-up other than good ol' Greta, who doe stories as related to politics as Montell Williams.
"the Global Warming myth."
Ahhh, you're THAT stupid. Good to know.
Lodatzor 1 year ago
"Impeach Obama. He is the worst president ever."
For... what exactly? For getting unemployment under control, for managing to get through a healthcare bill that, while not great, is still better than what we had before, for continuing the same policies in Afghanistan as his predecessors, for giving you a tax cut....
For what, exactly?
You don't even know why you don't like him. You've just been told not to, because he's a political adversary of your teachers at Fox. Sheesh, you're a cartoon.
Lodatzor 1 year ago
"He is worse than Carter and Bush jr"
Well, seeing as Carter wasn't that bad, and Bush Jnr was an inept idiot spouting the same ideology as you, I wonder what your standards are.
LOL. I bet you still think that Reagan was a GOOD president, don't you?
"His far left views are tearing this country apart at it's core."
Yeah, because having been in office for less than two years, he MUST be responsible for the problems caused by the last 30 years of right-wing leaning. Must be.
Lodatzor 1 year ago
You really do not understand do you, on any level, how the problems this country faces now are due to the insatiable and incessant move to the right that has occurred ever since Reagan introduced the odious and utterly disastrous notion of 'trickle-down economics'.
More hours, less wages, less securities, less regulation, more taxes for the middle class, less taxes for the rich, less protections under the law, less accountability...
THAT's what your idiotic brethren have done to our 'core'.
Lodatzor 1 year ago
And because you do not understand any of these things, you listen to Glenn Beck and Sean Hannity, who do not understand them either, when they harp on about Progressivism killing the country, etc.
Failing, of course, to realize that Progressivism is what has BUILT America. Otherwise black people would still be property, women would not be able to vote and children would be working in factories.
Want those days back, do you?
Lodatzor 1 year ago
@Lodatzor The Democratic Party started the KKK and instituted the Jim Crow laws in the South. Progressives are fascists in disguise and have done nothing to advance African Americans.
YFLOInternational 1 year ago
@YFLOInternational
"The Democratic Party started the KKK and instituted the Jim Crow laws in the South."
Yeah, and who all transferred to the Republican party in the 50s and 60s when the Democratic party became liberal. Your attacks are 60 years out of date. ;) But do try again, won't you?
"Progressives are fascists in disguise and have done nothing to advance African Americans."
Except for all that Civil Rights malarky, which you seem to so conveniently forget. ;)
Lodatzor 1 year ago
Let's contrast this with conservative contributions, which include the Confederates, the Redeemers (you know, those Jim Crow guys) and today's insistence that racism is something that should be constitutionally protected.
You're not really making yourself look informed here, you do realize that, right? ;)
Lodatzor 1 year ago
Incidentally, perhaps you are unfamiliar with what fascism actually IS.
In the words of Robert Paxton, fascism is:
"a form of political behavior marked by obsessive preoccupation with community decline, humiliation or victimhood and by compensatory cults of unity, energy and purity, in which a mass-based party of committed nationalist militants, working in uneasy, but effective collaboration with traditional elites, abandons democratic liberties and pursues with redemptive violence... (cont)
Lodatzor 1 year ago
"...(cont)...and without ethical or legal restraints goals of internal cleansing and external expansion."
Hmmm, step forward Beck and Limbaugh.
You see, chief, you've been drinking the Kool Aid for so long that you believe it is wine, when any cursory study of the matters at hand reveal quite the opposite of your beliefs. It is the right-wing extremities who preach the dogma of fascism, ever and anon dressing it up as some form of 'patriotism' instead of the puerile tribalism that it truly is.
Lodatzor 1 year ago
But you go right ahead. You just wow me with your understanding of socialism, communism and fascism , which thus far you have indicated you do not grasp in the slightest.
In short, prove that you're not just a troll who gets his material from Sean Hannity and Michael 'Savage' Wiener.
Ball's in your court, amigo. ;)
Lodatzor 1 year ago
@Lodatzor Have you even watched Fox at all? Almost every show they have brings in liberals to put in their two cents. Then they get cut down. Bill, Sean, Glenn, they all have liberals on. " Man made" global warming IS a myth. It is a business. Al Gore is in charge of numerous businesses that profit from "global warming." His net worth before his involvement? Around 9 million. His net worth now? Approx 93 million. Coincidence? You liberals just keep being sheep.
Jazepentz 1 year ago
@Jazepentz
"Have you even watched Fox at all?"
Well of course. That's how I know they're full of crap.
"Almost every show they have brings in liberals to put in their two cents."
And how many liberal HOSTS do they have, hmm? You see, bringing someone on whose mic you can cut, and who you can talk about after they have gone without giving them a chance to reply... does not count. That's what we call propaganda. ;)
Sorry, Fair and Balanced is exactly what Fox aint.
Lodatzor 1 year ago
"" Man made" global warming IS a myth."
Which must be why the vast majority of the scientific community declare that it is true, and only TV weathermen who would have to admit they'd been wrong for 40 years say that is is false.
"Al Gore is in charge of numerous businesses that profit from "global warming.""
Name one. Go for it. And see, if you can, how many of those are NON-profit organization. You'll find the number nears 100%. ;)
Big business indeed. :P It's scientific fact.
Lodatzor 1 year ago
"You liberals just keep being sheep."
Or we could keep on paying attention to the fact, not listening to the ramblings of men who declare themselves to be self-taught at the library 'where books are free' (when he came out with that one I nearly laughed myself silly).
It's the smart-person's choice.
Lodatzor 1 year ago
@Lodatzor CNN, MSNBC, AND ABC have tons of conservatives hosts now don't they? They are full of liberal spin. Global Springs Networks is one company that Al Gore has put investments in that directly profits from GloBULL Warming. And actually, the "vast majority of scientists," as you put it, do not buy into the man made part of global warming. The Earth's climate is always shifting. How do you think we have had so many ice ages and then that ice mysteriously melts on it's own?
Jazepentz 1 year ago
@Jazepentz
"do not buy into the man made part of global warming."
You are, quite simply, wrong. Here's the proof: stats . org/stories/2008/global_warming_survey_apr23_08 . html
As perhaps you meant Silver Springs Networks? Here's a nice little summary of exactly how Gore is not really raking much in:
ndtv . com/news/world/will_al_gore_be_a_carbon_billionaire . php
Facts and evidence, friend. That's what I have, and what Fox lacks. ;)
Lodatzor 1 year ago
"The Earth's climate is always shifting."
And the overwhelming evidence suggests that it is doing so at an abnormal rate induces by human activity. It's really rather concrete.
And, finally, as to CNN, MSNBC etc, you'll find that THOSE networks do not disguise their bias, which is actually significantly less than Fox News', who of course try and pretend that they have none at all.
Fox News is a lie. It's pretty simple, and pretty easy to point out.
Lodatzor 1 year ago
@Lodatzor It is obvious that the wool is pull so far over your eyes that you can't bear to see the truth. That is fine. You stay in your little liberal, ideological bubble safe and sound. I promise not to gloat too much when we win back the house in November, The white House and Senate in 2012, and when the earth doesn't melt from people driving SUVs and smoking cigarettes. Oh and most of the scientists that agree with man made global warming are NOT climate scientists...
Jazepentz 1 year ago
@Jazepentz
"It is obvious that the wool is pull so far over your eyes"
blah blah blah. What's obvious is that you have had no reply to any of my assertions, data or facts, and are engaging in the same tired old insult-war which I predicted you would.
"global warming are NOT climate scientists..."
Utter bullshit. But do provide some evidence, won't you, like I did?
You do realize that, like Evolution, it is only redneck America that doubts it? Everyone else prefers facts. ;)
Lodatzor 1 year ago 2
@Lodatzor climatedepot . com There are tones of useful links for you to meander through on this website. and some interesting things on this one as well aproundtable . org
Jazepentz 1 year ago
@Jazepentz
Well, I'll give you credit for producing two links.
However, I will also point out that your first link contains not a whit of scientific insight, nor indeed does it detail any scientists who agree with you. It appears to consist of photoshopped images made in order to make sarcastic and fraudulent advertising campaigns.
Alas, sir, this is still not evidence. ;) It is merely poor wit, in the same vein as those posters showing Obama as a voodoo doctor. :P
Lodatzor 1 year ago 2
And as for the second link, I nearly burst out laughing. So, your site, which by the way appears to have no link in any way to the climate 'debate' is an organization "founded in 1980 and is dedicated to restoring Judeo-Christian principles to American public policy."
In other words, applying religious doctrine to politics! Wow, guess you people have no regard for the 1st Amendment, eh?
You merely cemented my statement that the only people denying climate change are Evolution-deniers.
Lodatzor 1 year ago 2
@Lodatzor You know you love FOXNews. It's obvious from your baseless accusations against the news network. You are clearly infatuated with the FOXNews staff. BTW, if your ideas are as on point as you think they are, why do you only have 25 subscribers to your circus clown channel? Surely, if you were so accurate with regard to all your pseudo-intellectualisms you would have far more subscribers by now at your ripe old age of 29 in all is FAKE wisdom. U r simply an antagonist and inaccurate.
YFLOInternational 1 year ago
@YFLOInternational
Wow, you type all the above just to try and cover up the fact that you have nothing whatsoever with which to back yourself up. ;)
Pointless insults -- always the resort of the loser.
Lodatzor 1 year ago
@Lodatzor No. I have never insulted you. They are merely conjectures based on my intelligent observations of you.
YFLOInternational 1 year ago
@YFLOInternational
Nice try, but no cigar. ;)
So, once again, where is your evidence for the claim you made about Obama's grades being fudged? I notice you still lack the courage (not to mention the evidence itself) to respond to that point. ;)
When you would rather engage in 'conjecture' about another person rather than discuss the matter at hand, it's a pretty sterling indication that you're full of crap. That, or you're just trolling.
Sorry, bub, you're out of your league.
Lodatzor 1 year ago
But, I mean, I understand why you do it. You fairly obviously think that this debate is a 'rap battle', where being the loudest and most repetitive ensures victory.
Sadly, that type of contest is for the stage, to assess lingual dexterity and showmanship. Down here in the discussion trenches, facts and logic trump 'conjecture'.
But do keep trying the debate equivalent of calling me a 'punk' or a 'faggot'. You make yourself look silly, which is mildly entertaining. ;)
Lodatzor 1 year ago
@Lodatzor Why would the so-called president have an issue with his transcripts being released from Columbia college if he had such a "stellar" performance having graduated at the "top" of his Harvard class? Maybe because he is hiding something like his drug addictions.
YFLOInternational 1 year ago
@YFLOInternational
Or maybe not a single presidential candidate has ever submitted (or been asked for) such information before, and his campaign decided it would be an invasion of privacy and unduly dignifying a line of pointless conjecture?
So, the best you have is speculation on someone's motives in not handing out schoolwork, in a deliberate attempt to paint a picture of conspiracy.
That's not evidence, sir. Find me a statement or a document which reports or shows fudging.
Lodatzor 1 year ago
Otherwise your claim has as much validity as the Birther claim. Perhaps the identical nature of your claim's logical basis has escaped you?
Indeed, it seems that this claim of 'controversy' has very similar origins as the pathetic Birther claim: a sarcastic email:
truthorfiction . com/rumors/c/columbo-obama . htm
Sorry but I don't really respect the internet version of the National Enquirer too much.
Lodatzor 1 year ago
@YFLOInternational
Any evidence? Or did you just make that up???
alan111best 8 months ago
@alan111best Make what up?
YFLOInternational 8 months ago
I won't read her book. I try to read stuff that is either good fiction or intelligent and relevant, not some ignorant trash written for people with the depth of a teeny bopper rock fan.
MongoloidBabyUSA 1 year ago
@MongoloidBabyUSA Palin's just glossed up trailer trash.
tim23z 1 year ago
she's too out of the scene to run for president INTERVIEWER: WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION? PALIN: UM, I DONT KNOW WHAT THAT IS..
UtubeJ8ke 1 year ago
what ard the odds?????? 2012!!
!?!!
WHOEVERS president at 2012 will be havoc because on conspiracies abour people will be running crazy over BULLSHIT
UtubeJ8ke 1 year ago
OMG STOP KISSING HER ASS OBAMA!! jesus call her a rabid cunt or something shit!
moediggity28 2 years ago
@moediggity28 So you entirely missed his microexpression of contempt everytime he mentions her or the Republican Party? Even if he's kissing her ass, he's lying about his true feelings.
MafiosoGodot 1 year ago
Christian principles??? Thought you played that card with the last group. Bush and clan are a joke and the whole world knows it!
MAW54 2 years ago 7
Sarah
Palin's book
is at 7th grade level
its crap
Danold31wa 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
oh course he won't. it's not delivered on a teleprompter so there's no WAY he could read it.
kethuvim2006 2 years ago
shut the fuck up.. he reads better than you! ignoramus
amariari 2 years ago
@kethuvim2006 . Well said. Thankfully some people speak the truth!
ptp44444 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
OMG I love her so much! I just met her and she is the most amazing person ever!She's got my vote for 2012!
dancelover618 2 years ago
the real question is whether palin will read or if she has read her own book....it's an established fact that she didn't write it....and we know she doesn't read anything....as exposed by katie couric....so i think someone should quiz palin over the contents of her own book
jshooper 2 years ago 8
Palin did not write the book.
It was written by an extremely radical Evangelical.
DillonX 2 years ago
Obama not reading her book is Back Assward.
terrence0258 2 years ago
"There are a lot of people excited by her"
I. E. creepy old men who to stab her with Viagra induced penises
94fordtaurus 2 years ago
lol "Probably". Read: HELL NO.
jonr7007 2 years ago
Bushco left such a mess he won't have time to waste anytime soon.
ETericET 2 years ago 3
I agree I will not read her comic book...
bulluni 2 years ago 4
loooooooooooooool he almost exploded with a laugh almost...
kakahass 2 years ago 3
you know he wanted to laugh so hard when he got asked the question
sirdaveysockrocker 2 years ago 4
why the hell would he read her book? did sarah palin read obama's book?
b3rd4 2 years ago 9
She will when it's in TV guide :)
ETericET 2 years ago 2
I'm fairly certain she did.
TrueLoveWithin 2 years ago
Can Palin read?
94fordtaurus 2 years ago 3
because it's not anti american book?
newbombturk99 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Spread the word
hey check out on youtube and the comments
This guy Fisher will inspire you even more
watch?v=I5eZ8MFXEoc
watch?v=P9YtVQCu-Ww
SergioMendendez 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
maybe obama should be reading ECONOMICS 101 or ECONOMY FOR DUMMIES, instead of palin's book.
he probably still wouldn't able to comprehend those books.
blkconservativ 2 years ago
if this wasnt sarcasm:
I am pretty sure he took Economics somewhere along the way of becoming a lawyer.
MasrawyPasha 2 years ago 3
I suspect it is you who read economics for dummies, and now have a dummy level education in it.
j0hnwi11iams 2 years ago
truth hurts, huh? how would you know what's in "economics for dummies"? how far did you get reading the book, dummy?
blkconservativ 2 years ago
I read right past it. I started reading and didn't stop at the end of one book.
j0hnwi11iams 2 years ago
Actually, there's a book called "Economics in One Lesson" by Henry Hazlitt. Very informative.
MooseOfReason 2 years ago
You do know he has a degree in Economics right?
nuumskee 2 years ago
you do know unemployment is 10.2% right? you do know the stimulus package was a flop? you do know obama wants to all of a sudden have a "job summit" since unemployment is suppose to rise, right?
blkconservativ 2 years ago
all the more reason not to read palins shitty book...
EnhancementSmoker 2 years ago 3
but goin rouge is an excellent polishy book about how to apply makeup. Blush Limbaugh even said so himelf.
FullOfFail 2 years ago
Why should Obama read the idiot's book? he's already read all his 5th grade books when he was in 5th grade.
jjgreek1 2 years ago
that's right, you shouldn't be reading books. You should start doing your job. Or you know what since you're not doing anything, read Palin's book and learn something.
yousefd7 2 years ago
Or maybe YOU should try reading a book period. It starts with learning the alphabet, then learning what letters make what sounds when you put them together, then you start sonding out words, and what do you know...you might be able to read too. I'll bet you suck more at your job...if you can even keep one.
DVizyon 2 years ago
I don't have a job yet. I guess it's up to you to believe this, but I am studying to be a doctor. Stop by at Wayne State in Detroit and we'll chat about this. I would love to know more about why you're supporting this person.
Our country became great and amazing because it was founded on strong, honest, Christian principles. That is what we need to get back to and THAT is what Palin stands for.
yousefd7 2 years ago
she's a fraud plain and simple.. i hope she runs in 2012 and gets beat just like McCain did & i hope that when she is consoling the crowd they boo again like the ignorant sore losers they are.. Bump Palin & her book. if she won she would probably quit in the middle of it just like she did her mayoral job.. what a bonafide loser
amariari 2 years ago 19
So Palin's dishonesty and corruption are Christian principles too? Death panels, abuse of power, 150K in illegal campaign funds for clothes? It is sad that a future doctor should have such a weak grasp of history that he can only babble in talk radio childish bromides.
MongoloidBabyUSA 1 year ago
You should be reading medical or science texts and papers or some serious political science and history, not some teeny bopper juvenile nonsense.
MongoloidBabyUSA 1 year ago
what he really meant:
"I aint have time to reading the thoughts of that crazyass bitch. She didn't write the damn thing anyway since she can't even put a sentence together. Plus her daughter is a whore"
WKaliberr 2 years ago
"I'm an adult, and educated, and an important & serious person, and not insane... So, you know....... I probably won't."
WadeBlazingame34 2 years ago 7
he really should set aside some time to read some comedies every once in a while..
sem1conscious 2 years ago 3
An adult talking about a child.
IAMtheNewWorldOrder 2 years ago 3
Right Mister President, tell them that Palin is the most excellent republican candidate for 2012. Makes it a hell of lot easier to get another term.
kaju59 2 years ago 11
LOL.. True
RodgersRevolution 2 years ago
Something I've noticed is that Sarah Palin has become a sort of celebrity, with a book, and is being supported by some for President in 2012. Isn't this the criticism thrown towards President Obama when he was running and still today. He was just some celebrity type figure with a book?
MexicanMetlAC 2 years ago 6
at least Obama is smart and was aware of not only what was going on in Washington, but around the world. This woman only knows snow, and it shows.
seededsoul 2 years ago
As Bill Maher said about Palin's book: "It's not out yet, it's being translated into English"
jround93 2 years ago 7
Probably?
gobbledygookie 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The Associated Press has assigned 11 reporters to fact check 432 pages of Palin's book. The AP asiigned zero reporters to fact check Obama's, Ted Kennedy's and Bill and Hillary Clinton's books.
Speaks volumes of what political party the AP takes it's orders from.
bnaguy 2 years ago
Or maybe it just speaks volumes about Palin? From what I've seen of the fact checks on her book so far it needs it...not that anyone is surprised.
deepraine 2 years ago 7