Brilliant, the evolutionists believe in magic, matter and energy created out of nothing and its all an accident, by pure chance, nothingness can turn into men by the magic wand of time, the cauldren of primordial soup Sorry i don't have enough blind faith to believe in your fairy stories and silly religion, i already have a faith and creation is self evident if you have not been indocrinated into this false pagan religion called evolution.
@Bornagain271 "Brilliant, the evolutionists believe in magic, matter and energy created out of nothing" nope we don't know exactly. How's saying a magic sky fairy who came from nothing did it better?
"by pure chance" not even close. If you think galactic formation, stellar development, abiogenesis, biological evolution, etc are fairy tails and pure chance you've no idea what science is
"pagan religion called evolution" evolution's a religion like not stamp collecting is a hobby
@Bornagain271 " its all an accident” --> accident would imply a creator who never intended the universe. Like if your god got drunk in heaven one day and spilled the universe into existence.
You believe in magic: supernatural entities making everything from nothing.
Evolution has nothing to do with the creation of the universe dummy.
You know there are more than 1 creation story. Even if Evolution, Stellar/Galactic/Universe Cosmology is wrong today, you'd still need evidence to support your claims
The Vedic of the Hindus is far older than the bible and has its own creation story. So why should we suppose the OT version is correct when there's just as much evidence for the Vedic, Egyptian "Book of the Dead" and many others have Creation Stories
@sol3a1 Not true, all false religions can be traced back to Bablylon including the vedic Hindhu religion and Egyption religion. Carbon 14 dating has been proven to based on false premise. You have been lied to about the ages of these false religions. God scattered the nations after the tower of Babel and they carried their false religions with them.
@Bornagain271 "Not true, all false religions can be traced back to Bablylon including the vedic Hindhu religion and Egyption religion" as can christianity, "Epic of Gilgamesh" anyone? The "Hanging Gardens", virgins giving birth to the main gods' kids
"Carbon 14 dating has been proven to based on false premise" really? C14's 1/2 life id 5760 yrs. Made from N14 in the atmosphere. It is constantly being remade. It works though for life that is terrestrial. So what's your beef?
@Bornagain271 "You have been lied to about the ages of these false religions" all religions are bogus and as real as someone starting the "Church of Nessie" as they all have the same amount of evidence
"God scattered the nations after the tower of Babel" what a joke
You know there are more than 1 creation story. Even if Evolution, Stellar/Galactic/Universe Cosmology is wrong today, you'd still need evidence to support your claims
The Vedic of the Hindus is far older than the bible and has its own creation story. So why should we suppose the OT version is correct when there's just as much evidence for the Vedic, Egyptian "Book of the Dead" and many others have Creation Stories
The water would have to move faster than the speed of sound in order to carve the mountains and canyons in 40 days and nights. take away all the dating methods and you still have the time the light from the stars to burn out and star light to hit earth you are now giving more time for macro changes than geologist will allow.
2000 years is no enough time for the micro changes to needed to combat the defects of paired breeding incest. Assuming there where 10,000 base "kinds" babies and eggs 4000 years is not enough time for the micro changes to combat incest or for all the diversity of specis with in "kinds".There are no fossils that suport all beast where vegetarians before the flood.
Sahelanthropus tchadensis, Ardipithecus ramidus, Australopithecus anamensis, Australopithecus afarensis, Kenyanthropus platyops, Australopithecus africanus, Australopithecus garhi, Australopithecus sediba, Australopithecus aethiopicus, Australopithecus robustus, Australopithecus boisei, Homo habilis, Homo georgicus, Homo erectus,, Homo ergaster, Homo antecessor, Homo heidelbergensis, Homo neanderthalensis, Homo floresiensis, Homo sapiens
Hilarious. Marvelously entertaining! I laughed hysterically (maybe "heretically").
Factual? Not so much.
I admire the simplicity of the world as he describes. Since the bible has not changed in thousands of years, there is never any new information to comprehend. All is very small, very simple - no progress, no hope for progress - absolutely no thought or legitimate research is ever required. The "perimeter of ignorance" is very close to home (thanks Prof. Tyson!).
Hilarious. Marvelously entertaining! I laughed histerically (maybe even heretically).
Factual? Not so much.
I admire the simplicity of the world as he describes. Since the bible has not changed in thousands of years, there is never any new information to comprehend. All is very small, very simple, no progress, no hope for progress, and absolutely no thought or legitimate research is ever required. The "perimeter of ignorance" is very close to home (thanks Prof. Tyson!).
Yep we are all happy accidents that just appeared out of no where for no reason but to live and procreate LoL fools and you get 23 chromosomes from each of your parents that is hardly evolution LoL
There are more random scientist named Steve that trust the evolutionary model than all religious that believe otherwise. See for yourself look up: Project Steve. Just Sayin.
Regardless of whatever you have to say on fossil records, they do NOT have any standing on whether evolution is true or not. All fields of biology only makes sense when thought of in evolution. INCLUDING MEDICINE.
Even if we had none, nothing would change.
Reality works like this We put aside preconceptions, we look at the facts, we come to conclusions that are useful.
Put aside your preconceptions.
Come back and join us in reality. Its far more interesting than this crap.
13:55 No, that is called a reasonable deduction considering we understand evolution and its history to make intelligent assumptions. You can show doubt that fish evolved from a primitive invertebrate, but we make the assumption because our understanding of evolution suggests this is the case, and any other evolutionary ideas without evidence would be illogical at best and irrational at worst.
You are relativelyquite good at this.
shame that the best you have to offer is ray comfort and the like.
And to call them body 'plans' is stupid. there was no plan there was only survival. Apparently they worked. The ones that didn't (and there are LOADS that did not work) Died.
i recommend Richard Dawkins - the greatest show on earth. There is significantly little bible bashing, but it contains about all answers to questions for people who dont understand the field properly...
Have you looked at the Creatures in the cambrian explosion...? they are hardly complex. It just so happens that the explosion happened because simple animals found a way to utilise oxygen giving them a huge survival advantage. Thus in order to survive they had to evolve, VERY QUICKLY (relatively speaking)...
@bassmanco ...The reality is that the foundations that worked for animals today were found at that time because they were solid quality ideas (hard shell/hard backbone) these were the two SURVIVING good choices that standout in the world today (there were also jellyfish etc but we seem quite keen on these two) little else survived long, and a half way in between is a STUPID idea...
@bassmanco ...and a half way there will benefit A HELL OF A LOT from having that slightly stringer a backbone/hard shell. so they evolved very quickly.
The main point is however, that the odds of a fossil being created is very rare. Considerably more so for animals without hard shells/bones. Odds are that the combination of the speed of evolution going on and the rarity in successful fossil formation, make this look like an instant transition. It was not.
@gblueslover2 this is wonderful news!! Can you just demonstrate it? I mean demonstrate anything, anything that shows the christian cult is anything more than mythos? ...no? really? are you sure? just faith? yes we should trust you? you really mean it? you felt it? you heard it? those are not facts friendo!!!
Hmmm God cretaed the " Heaven and earth ". So this DOESN'T explain the universe, AT ALL. Please don't claim that the Heaven is the universe.- It's not. heaven is ALREADY reserved for that place where only "true followers" go, after death.
Now, since God ONLY created heaven & earth, this means the REST was already there, and he just added to it.
@gblueslover2 It says "God created the HEAVENS and earth." Notice the S at the end (the guy in the video misspoke). Heavens in this case, refers to the universe. So it does explain the universe. Whenever "heavens" is used in the Bible, it's talking about the universe. When "HEAVEN" (without the S) is used, it's talking about the place for the righteous.
@TChapman500I dont buy into the afterlife scenario. People need to struggle to be truly happy, not just "being" happy every second for eternity . There needs to be frustration also in heaven because people don't operate this way. You should stop milking this pipe dream, because it just is not true.Sorry. Heaven as you describe must be located in a place in the uinverse for all living to see. The LACK of accountability of the LOCATION of "heaven" is irresponsible...Because it's a made-up story
@gblueslover2 The word "heavens" refers to the universe itself. If you were to put Genesis 1:1 to modern terms, it would read "In the beginning, God created the universe and the earth." The word "Heaven" refers to a spiritual place and it does not exist in this universe, it exists in eternity. And I speak from experience when I say it's a FACT that God exists.
Show physical evidence of God,,, & don't give me that look around BS nature is not proof for GOD... science has no problem with being wrong Religion DOES
Well, the evolution of intelligence in the past few hundred thousand years just goes to show that evolution doesn't go steadily on and on, but in waves. If for example after the extinction of humans some other race tried to find human remains in fossils from before we "flooded" the planet, they would have found practically none. In fossils from after that "explosion" of human population, for example from today, they would be seeing them everywhere.
from non life, in a process we know as a-biogenesis. The earth forming, has nothing to do with evolution, and proves that this guy is nothing but insanely stupid. Who gives a shit about what the bible says? It was written by shephards who knew nothing about science. There is no evidence pointing towards that.
The definition of a specie is one animal that can succesfully breed with another animal.
00:48 yes, and if you read the next line is his books he explain WHY YOU FUCKING PIECE OF SHIT.
This is so full of shit. But I will take the time to debunk it all.
00:43 No, evolution says absolotely nothing about that. This is in the field of geology and astronomy and physics, and has absolotely nothing to do with evolution. Secondly, the earth didnt evolve, you idiot. It was physically and naturally created in other ways. Study of astronomy tells you exactly how planets form.
00:47 no, wrong again. Life didnt EVOLVE from non life, since evolution is addaption. Chemicals created life
@gulbirk the logical predictions of evolutionary theories do not match the actual data. Either 1) evolution is a very random process that does not follow the usual rules of biology and chemistry or 2) life was not created through evolutionary mechanisms..."I have undergone a conversion--a sort of epiphany. There are no old Y chromosome lineages [in living humans]. There are no old mtDNA lineages. Period. It was a total replacement." Vince Sarich of the University of California.
@MultiSamwel """Either 1) evolution is a very random process that does not follow the usual rules of biology and chemistry or""
No. Actually evolution goes by a process called natural selection. You are right, life wasnt CREATED through evolutionary processes. Its starts with chemical processes and when it has started it ADDAPTS by evolutionary means.
No old Y chromosome? I dont think you even know what you just stated.
@gulbirk how was 100 % left handed amino acid created in an oxygen infested planet.. we all know amino acids cannot react under these conditions..please state what quelifications you have im willing to debate.
@gulbirk Homochirality somehow arose in the sugars and amino acids of prebiotic soups, although there is no mechanism by which this can occur and is, in fact, prohibited by the second law of thermodynamics (law of entropy).
@MultiSamwel Ok, stop copy pasting things from google, if you want me to even bother to respond.
First of all, go look up what left handed and right handed amino acids actually are. Secondly, the second law of thermo dynamics deals with physics and states that energy will be drained in a closed system.
If I may interveen, the paper "right handed amino acids were left behind" in the July 2nd 2006 edition of Newscientist do deal with that and explains the predominance of left handed amino acids.
Also, the earth is not a closed system since it receive energy and heat from the sun, hence, the second law of thermodynamic do not apply in the formation of the first self replicating organic molecule.
A classic in strawman generation, quote-mining, ignoring inconvenient facts, and arguments from ignorance. It doesn't get more intellectually dishonest than this folks!
Your desperate rambling will only "keep the sheep to the flock". Anyone with just one iota of critical thinking will unmask your "highly educated people" as the biblethumping, lying-for-christ creatards they are. And hopefully some of your sheep, that haven't been beaten into obedience by their parents, will have the strength and courage to get past the threat of social isolation by family and "friends" and break away from this insane cult called evangelism.
The stupid. IT burns. This video is a collection of all the creationist arguments. Debunked countless of time, misunderstanding of science and a healthy dose of dishonesty.
Wow, I never thought about it before, but the poorly transcripted oral traditions of people from thousands of years ago who were unversed in science have turned me around. Praise Jeebus!
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible in nature (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). Species couldn't have survived while their vital tissues, organs, biological systems were still evolving. Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species.
Ten minutes in and all I've seen are lies about the cambrian explosion. The Cambrian explosion is not evidence for creation. It was the time when animals began to hard hard parts in their bodies. And there were no bunnies in it. Oh yeah, and your flood never happened.
What is so hard to understand about science's understanding of "The History of The World"?
How do the claims of the bible even remotely compete with science. It's weird to think that the bible can even compete as an explanation.
Notice how this creatard doesn't give any evidence for his position, except for stating that a book by Bronze Age sheepherders is somehow infallible. Just totally weird.
No transitional fossils in the Cambrian... except for all the soft-bodied Pre-Cambrian fossils.
The Earth is created from the shards of a duck egg and the first man (Väinämöinen) is born to the goddess Ilmatar. Väinämöinen brings trees and life to the barren world. -Kalevala
Meaning that even if evolution would not work at all it does not automatically validate Abrahamic god. Whole thing is false dichotomy. Still require evidence of the proposed claim. 25:19 "Great claims require real evidence" is what I agree, so prove your god.
scientist do the research, find evidence, develop theories - all the bible can do / does is disapprove and attack. very, very productive and convincing :) i hope alternative reasonable explanation (such as origins of life in space) will be supplied really soon - what will you do then? read the bible once again, searching for more counter-arguments? why? why is it so important to you to attack science? why is religion so intimidated by science?
@1utubaccount Because they know they are wrong and that science will take over the world. Oh and the fact that Jehovah will just become another mythological god that never existed lmao.
take a look at "vietnams infinite cave" by nat geo.you will find plant life that looks prehystoric yet dna shows no change. yet if we found this evidence in the fossil record we would state this difference to be evidence of evolution.environmental influence in a single generation with no dna shift tells us that without dna ident we will be victims of non-science.......total non-science!
Not only does religion have nothing going for it..... but they continuously spew out the same fallacious arguments and lies. You don't need to look at all the evidence that shows religion isn't true... you can just look at these idiots and liars who refuse to learn simple facts while claiming to speak for their god. A real god wouldn't need apologists, liars and priests in lab coats.
@sfg911 no offense but neither should science. God is real. God will reign. every knee will bow and every tongue will confess that God is Lord! thank you and God bless! (:
@CallingOut101 Well... just claiming "science" spews out fallacious arguments isn't good enough, you actually have to demonstrate that. Sure you can find one... maybe TWO if you look hard enough. I can find 10,000 lies from theists for every 1 from a scientists. And who finds the lies from scientists??? Other scientists! Theists NEVER correct other theists except when they are arguing over what they THINK god wants.
@sfg911 yeah alot of theists lie. alot of christians lie. but i'm pretty positive an atheist dont always tell the truth. if your upset enough about being proven wrong you'll make up lies. thats the bad thing with "religion." religion ruins ppl bc they get soo uptight bout everythin lol i'm not religious.. i'm a bible believing christian. I'm not really against atheism or agnostics or even scientific facts but i do know that i've seen more ppl healed from cancer by God then by science. -John 3:16
@CallingOut101 "I'm not religious... I'm a bible believing christian" I'm not a square... I'm a 2 dimensional object with 4 sides of equal length.
"I'm not really against scientific fact... but i do know that i've seen more ppl healed from cancer by God then by science" I like law.. but I do know that more thieves toss themselves into jail than get caught by police.
You are right about one thing ... a lot of christians make up lies
@sfg911 the thing in saying that being religious and christian is the same thing is really wrong. the christian religion is killing itself with people who are being stupid! the religious people who wont let you come to church bc you wear pants? thats dumb. the objective of being christian is to be Christ like. i can be christ like without being religious. and i again i cant say i dont believe in scientific fact bc the proof is there but i dont put my faith in it. how many times will science fail
@CallingOut101 religious = christian = religion. Sorry, you can't separate this just because you don't like what some of your group is doing. If you believe Jesus rose from the dead and you need to believe this to get a special pass into heaven then you believe in a religion. Sure you can be christ like without being religious... (ignoring the fact that Jesus wasn't christ like) but if you believe you need to be christ like to appease some god then you are religious.
@CallingOut101 How many times will science fail?? You need to try to fail and only through fail will you learn from your mistakes. Religion does not even try... this is like arguing you shouldn't get off the couch because people can fall.
Actually, religion DOES try to explain the world... just when it fails (and has countless times) it simply makes excuses, moves the goal post and claims it's always been correct... while whining that science didn't know everything from day one.
You can't argue with someone that says "God Did It".
There are transitional fossils, but the religious won't look.
The transitional faith record is full of transitions from simple religious beliefs too much more complex belief systems! lets not forget about religion borrowing.
Molecular evidence is of far greater significance. It's somewhat silly to attempt to discuss the fossil record at any point in time, since we'll never know if there's more to be found. Molecular evidence, however, is there to be seen now and doesn't have the same problems just mentioned as the fossil record.
You don't need to have all "transitional fossils " to prove evolution is true it isn't even possible to have all "transitional fossils" because every generation of organisms is transitional form and fossilization of remains occur only in special circumstances.
@Darwinsgift haha, cough faked drawings, cough faked "missing links" cough foundation based on assumption (dating), cough cough ok I cleared my throat. You have to be trolling m8, you claim that there is evidence of real value that support evolutionism? Oh gosh I would love to hear it.
@Stianchez -Faked drawings are really just artistic impressions based on the bone structure, they may not be totally accurate. Faked fossils are due to those who seek either to discredit or profit which were found to be fake by scientific study. However feathered raptor dinosaurs have been found yet this is not mentioned as bird like breathing and bone similarities are also ignored together with beaks and nesting sites. This man thinks trilobites evolved into fish and is surprised at no proof!
@Darwinsgift #1 Fake drawings HAHAHA, your attempt to defend is F******* laughable. They are WAY innaccurate and I work in the buisness(Art). Compare the drawings to the real thing is a disgrace. Dont try to defend bullshit. Ok sorry I got a bit fired up, but please understand. What you are trying there is kinda ridicolouse. No offence. It would be as if I draw a cat, when trying to draw a dog.
Regarding fossils, thats awholenother topic. People are going away from the idea "Tree of life"
@Stianchez - You fell into my trap there by refuting the unimportant part of my statement and totally ignoring the essential part of my argument. Start studying fossil transitions and you will see this man for what he is! If people are moving away from the obvious proof then it shows how indoctrination by unscrupulous religious leaders is a travesty.
Ho-ho you fell into my trap aswell.... right, anyway I answered your last segment by refering to the tree of life. Which most people now start saying "Bushes of life" Where there are so many significant differences in the "early" fossils that they cannot explain it coming from one specie. It's a bit off what you wanted but it should wrap it up nicely. Taken from a paelontologist . "The lack of transitional fossils are the trade secret of paelentology"
Not only that, but it doesn't get him where he wants. Genesis does not become an alternative foundation for modern biology if some aspect of evolutionary theory is false. What would happen is that whatever new data was unearthed would lead to a new naturalistic theory.
The theory of evolution gets its explanatory power from interconnections between many fields, such as genetics, paleontology, higher level biology/anatomy, physics etc. All of which converge on the tree of life documenting common descent. And this clown's response to that is to pick at some point he feels is not 100% documented, but inferred from the understanding that evolution is true(much like aircraft are built with the understanding that gravity is uniform). Such objections are irrelevant.
Why should we not insult this retarded ignorant when the very title of your video is accusing the entire scientific community of lying and suggesting a global conspiracy that would have no purpose what so ever except screwing over your cult. This is a symptom of paranoid delusions.
If this guy was interested in the scientific answers - he could find them at amazon for a few bucks and go check out the evidence for himself at a museum of natural history.
You state they're highly educated. I wonder where. Anyway, maybe if fossils were easier to make (look up what it takes for nature to create a fossil), and we had everybody looking for them (not just archeologists and paleontologists, etc.) we'd have all those gaps filled in. Creationists just don't understand what a "transitional" fossil would be. There aren't going to be creatures with parts of vertebrae or half skin-half scale creatures. Evolution just doesn't work that way.
your agreeing with the video. he is saying there is no CURRENT evidence to proof it so why teach it? if you say it is difficult then evolution is not science just faith for we have not found the missing links to back it up.
@illusionistik No I am saying that the creationists are claiming there are no transitional fossils. I say the ones looking for them are in fact finding them. Everything so far has stood up to the evolution theory. My previous comment was just to point out to the "gap" people that if we had everybody looking for fossils that we would have all the irrefutable evidence they claim we lack. They also don't realize that not everything becomes a fossil.
what is a kind? define it. the only thing that would make macro evolution false, is if there is some invisible barrier that prevents species from diverging to much.. where is this evidence? your are talking out of your ASSES.. you are so brainwashed that you simply IGNORE the facts people have found about YOUR gods creation. you shun your own gods creation. you are dishonest to the core. your ilk is a sore to the human species.
Don't insult him? It took this guy less than 5 minutes to start with the insults, although insulting our elected leaders is a cottage industry in most countries, but let us continue.
Great vid. All of the indignation athee/evos spew doesn't cover for the fact that their fairytale has yet to produce ONE SHRED of evidence. Science supports the Bible, all the greats from Newton to Faraday understood this clearly, it has only been since the recent delusion that man thought he knew something as fact about which he can only make blind assumptions.
Seriously. Using the bible as a reference for anything other than common philosophy, parables or bronze-age myths is a non-starter. No wonder you are wandering in the wilderness of ignorance when your sources of information are fictional.
Grow up. The world doesn't revolve around your delusions.
I love it when creationists think that the whole of the scientific community is in on one big conspiracy against their religion. It's really just as hilarious as any other conspiracy theory.
This has been flagged as spam show
Join in on Debates at:
religiousdebates.co.uk
YouTutorials0 5 days ago
Brilliant, the evolutionists believe in magic, matter and energy created out of nothing and its all an accident, by pure chance, nothingness can turn into men by the magic wand of time, the cauldren of primordial soup Sorry i don't have enough blind faith to believe in your fairy stories and silly religion, i already have a faith and creation is self evident if you have not been indocrinated into this false pagan religion called evolution.
Bornagain271 2 weeks ago
@Bornagain271 "Brilliant, the evolutionists believe in magic, matter and energy created out of nothing" nope we don't know exactly. How's saying a magic sky fairy who came from nothing did it better?
"by pure chance" not even close. If you think galactic formation, stellar development, abiogenesis, biological evolution, etc are fairy tails and pure chance you've no idea what science is
"pagan religion called evolution" evolution's a religion like not stamp collecting is a hobby
sol3a1 1 week ago
@Bornagain271 " its all an accident” --> accident would imply a creator who never intended the universe. Like if your god got drunk in heaven one day and spilled the universe into existence.
You believe in magic: supernatural entities making everything from nothing.
Evolution has nothing to do with the creation of the universe dummy.
BaneOfAzrael 3 days ago
STUPID NIGGERS GONNA NIG
QuamieLaundersAgain 1 month ago
And the evidence for this conjecture is where?
You know there are more than 1 creation story. Even if Evolution, Stellar/Galactic/Universe Cosmology is wrong today, you'd still need evidence to support your claims
The Vedic of the Hindus is far older than the bible and has its own creation story. So why should we suppose the OT version is correct when there's just as much evidence for the Vedic, Egyptian "Book of the Dead" and many others have Creation Stories
Show evidence yours is real one
sol3a1 2 months ago
@sol3a1 Not true, all false religions can be traced back to Bablylon including the vedic Hindhu religion and Egyption religion. Carbon 14 dating has been proven to based on false premise. You have been lied to about the ages of these false religions. God scattered the nations after the tower of Babel and they carried their false religions with them.
Bornagain271 2 weeks ago
@Bornagain271 "Not true, all false religions can be traced back to Bablylon including the vedic Hindhu religion and Egyption religion" as can christianity, "Epic of Gilgamesh" anyone? The "Hanging Gardens", virgins giving birth to the main gods' kids
"Carbon 14 dating has been proven to based on false premise" really? C14's 1/2 life id 5760 yrs. Made from N14 in the atmosphere. It is constantly being remade. It works though for life that is terrestrial. So what's your beef?
sol3a1 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Bornagain271 "You have been lied to about the ages of these false religions" all religions are bogus and as real as someone starting the "Church of Nessie" as they all have the same amount of evidence
"God scattered the nations after the tower of Babel" what a joke
sol3a1 2 weeks ago
And the evidence for this conjecture is where?
You know there are more than 1 creation story. Even if Evolution, Stellar/Galactic/Universe Cosmology is wrong today, you'd still need evidence to support your claims
The Vedic of the Hindus is far older than the bible and has its own creation story. So why should we suppose the OT version is correct when there's just as much evidence for the Vedic, Egyptian "Book of the Dead" and many others have Creation Stories
Show evidence yours is real one
sol3a1 2 months ago
The water would have to move faster than the speed of sound in order to carve the mountains and canyons in 40 days and nights. take away all the dating methods and you still have the time the light from the stars to burn out and star light to hit earth you are now giving more time for macro changes than geologist will allow.
TheMrgoku1985 2 months ago
2000 years is no enough time for the micro changes to needed to combat the defects of paired breeding incest. Assuming there where 10,000 base "kinds" babies and eggs 4000 years is not enough time for the micro changes to combat incest or for all the diversity of specis with in "kinds".There are no fossils that suport all beast where vegetarians before the flood.
TheMrgoku1985 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
watch?v=S9am3mfaE6U
Sahelanthropus tchadensis, Ardipithecus ramidus, Australopithecus anamensis, Australopithecus afarensis, Kenyanthropus platyops, Australopithecus africanus, Australopithecus garhi, Australopithecus sediba, Australopithecus aethiopicus, Australopithecus robustus, Australopithecus boisei, Homo habilis, Homo georgicus, Homo erectus,, Homo ergaster, Homo antecessor, Homo heidelbergensis, Homo neanderthalensis, Homo floresiensis, Homo sapiens
TheMrgoku1985 2 months ago
Hilarious. Marvelously entertaining! I laughed hysterically (maybe "heretically").
Factual? Not so much.
I admire the simplicity of the world as he describes. Since the bible has not changed in thousands of years, there is never any new information to comprehend. All is very small, very simple - no progress, no hope for progress - absolutely no thought or legitimate research is ever required. The "perimeter of ignorance" is very close to home (thanks Prof. Tyson!).
My world=more complex!
ken1139 2 months ago
Hilarious. Marvelously entertaining! I laughed histerically (maybe even heretically).
Factual? Not so much.
I admire the simplicity of the world as he describes. Since the bible has not changed in thousands of years, there is never any new information to comprehend. All is very small, very simple, no progress, no hope for progress, and absolutely no thought or legitimate research is ever required. The "perimeter of ignorance" is very close to home (thanks Prof. Tyson!).
My world=more complex!
ken1139 2 months ago
Yep we are all happy accidents that just appeared out of no where for no reason but to live and procreate LoL fools and you get 23 chromosomes from each of your parents that is hardly evolution LoL
360jab 2 months ago
There are more random scientist named Steve that trust the evolutionary model than all religious that believe otherwise. See for yourself look up: Project Steve. Just Sayin.
pumpstations 3 months ago
Regardless of whatever you have to say on fossil records, they do NOT have any standing on whether evolution is true or not. All fields of biology only makes sense when thought of in evolution. INCLUDING MEDICINE.
Even if we had none, nothing would change.
Reality works like this We put aside preconceptions, we look at the facts, we come to conclusions that are useful.
Put aside your preconceptions.
Come back and join us in reality. Its far more interesting than this crap.
bassmanco 3 months ago
Trilobites are arthropods, they did not evolve into fish. dont know where you got that information, but it isnt correct.
Intermediates are rare... see initial comments.
Ok im getting board. time to skip to the important part.
bassmanco 3 months ago
13:55 No, that is called a reasonable deduction considering we understand evolution and its history to make intelligent assumptions. You can show doubt that fish evolved from a primitive invertebrate, but we make the assumption because our understanding of evolution suggests this is the case, and any other evolutionary ideas without evidence would be illogical at best and irrational at worst.
You are relativelyquite good at this.
shame that the best you have to offer is ray comfort and the like.
bassmanco 3 months ago
Your Bloody 'transition fossil' statements are driving me insane!
NO ANIMAL SURVIVES ONLY TO BE PART OF THE THING IT IS EVOLVING INTO. IT NEEDS TO BE ABLE TO SURVIVE WELL AS IT IS.
Your concept of transitional fossil is at odds with reality.
I am the evolutionary transition of my parents.
I am genetically close enough to mate and create viable offspring with all other living homosapians.
bassmanco 3 months ago
And to call them body 'plans' is stupid. there was no plan there was only survival. Apparently they worked. The ones that didn't (and there are LOADS that did not work) Died.
i recommend Richard Dawkins - the greatest show on earth. There is significantly little bible bashing, but it contains about all answers to questions for people who dont understand the field properly...
bassmanco 3 months ago
Cambrian explosion statement.
Have you looked at the Creatures in the cambrian explosion...? they are hardly complex. It just so happens that the explosion happened because simple animals found a way to utilise oxygen giving them a huge survival advantage. Thus in order to survive they had to evolve, VERY QUICKLY (relatively speaking)...
bassmanco 3 months ago
@bassmanco ...The reality is that the foundations that worked for animals today were found at that time because they were solid quality ideas (hard shell/hard backbone) these were the two SURVIVING good choices that standout in the world today (there were also jellyfish etc but we seem quite keen on these two) little else survived long, and a half way in between is a STUPID idea...
bassmanco 3 months ago
@bassmanco ...and a half way there will benefit A HELL OF A LOT from having that slightly stringer a backbone/hard shell. so they evolved very quickly.
The main point is however, that the odds of a fossil being created is very rare. Considerably more so for animals without hard shells/bones. Odds are that the combination of the speed of evolution going on and the rarity in successful fossil formation, make this look like an instant transition. It was not.
I left 3 comments, strt frm th frst.
bassmanco 3 months ago
I would love to see a model of the flood. Why has no one ever really dont math on the flood. If you know of some please let me know.
orge121 3 months ago
Highly educated,LOL
brianhar100 3 months ago
@gblueslover2 this is wonderful news!! Can you just demonstrate it? I mean demonstrate anything, anything that shows the christian cult is anything more than mythos? ...no? really? are you sure? just faith? yes we should trust you? you really mean it? you felt it? you heard it? those are not facts friendo!!!
cadeere74 3 months ago
@sungate153 "And I speak from experience when I say it's a FACT that God exists."
Well then TELL ME of YOUR experience then....
gblueslover2 3 months ago
Hmmm God cretaed the " Heaven and earth ". So this DOESN'T explain the universe, AT ALL. Please don't claim that the Heaven is the universe.- It's not. heaven is ALREADY reserved for that place where only "true followers" go, after death.
Now, since God ONLY created heaven & earth, this means the REST was already there, and he just added to it.
WEIRD, sounds really FALSE and FAKE.
gblueslover2 4 months ago
@gblueslover2 It says "God created the HEAVENS and earth." Notice the S at the end (the guy in the video misspoke). Heavens in this case, refers to the universe. So it does explain the universe. Whenever "heavens" is used in the Bible, it's talking about the universe. When "HEAVEN" (without the S) is used, it's talking about the place for the righteous.
TChapman500 3 months ago
Comment removed
gblueslover2 3 months ago
@TChapman500I dont buy into the afterlife scenario. People need to struggle to be truly happy, not just "being" happy every second for eternity . There needs to be frustration also in heaven because people don't operate this way. You should stop milking this pipe dream, because it just is not true.Sorry. Heaven as you describe must be located in a place in the uinverse for all living to see. The LACK of accountability of the LOCATION of "heaven" is irresponsible...Because it's a made-up story
gblueslover2 3 months ago
@gblueslover2 The word "heavens" refers to the universe itself. If you were to put Genesis 1:1 to modern terms, it would read "In the beginning, God created the universe and the earth." The word "Heaven" refers to a spiritual place and it does not exist in this universe, it exists in eternity. And I speak from experience when I say it's a FACT that God exists.
TChapman500 3 months ago
@TChapman500 Really ? Did you see him ?
gblueslover2 3 months ago
Show physical evidence of God,,, & don't give me that look around BS nature is not proof for GOD... science has no problem with being wrong Religion DOES
georgecaraballo 4 months ago
try..genesis and creation:genesis 1:1-micheal heiser,(you tube) thanks
willywonka661 4 months ago
Nothing but a parody of retarded humanity.
Three thumbs down for this total bullshit.
M0b1u5 5 months ago
I don't hate science but when you consider evolution a fact and God a theory... that's stepping into your religion.. :)
xic4loca 5 months ago
Well, the evolution of intelligence in the past few hundred thousand years just goes to show that evolution doesn't go steadily on and on, but in waves. If for example after the extinction of humans some other race tried to find human remains in fossils from before we "flooded" the planet, they would have found practically none. In fossils from after that "explosion" of human population, for example from today, they would be seeing them everywhere.
Iguana93 5 months ago
you are the only exception of evolution
ataEMMEata 5 months ago
This is nothing buy quote mining and arguments from ignorance and outright lies, you deserve not respect, nor attention.
gulbirk 5 months ago
from non life, in a process we know as a-biogenesis. The earth forming, has nothing to do with evolution, and proves that this guy is nothing but insanely stupid. Who gives a shit about what the bible says? It was written by shephards who knew nothing about science. There is no evidence pointing towards that.
The definition of a specie is one animal that can succesfully breed with another animal.
00:48 yes, and if you read the next line is his books he explain WHY YOU FUCKING PIECE OF SHIT.
gulbirk 5 months ago
This is so full of shit. But I will take the time to debunk it all.
00:43 No, evolution says absolotely nothing about that. This is in the field of geology and astronomy and physics, and has absolotely nothing to do with evolution. Secondly, the earth didnt evolve, you idiot. It was physically and naturally created in other ways. Study of astronomy tells you exactly how planets form.
00:47 no, wrong again. Life didnt EVOLVE from non life, since evolution is addaption. Chemicals created life
gulbirk 5 months ago
@gulbirk the logical predictions of evolutionary theories do not match the actual data. Either 1) evolution is a very random process that does not follow the usual rules of biology and chemistry or 2) life was not created through evolutionary mechanisms..."I have undergone a conversion--a sort of epiphany. There are no old Y chromosome lineages [in living humans]. There are no old mtDNA lineages. Period. It was a total replacement." Vince Sarich of the University of California.
MultiSamwel 4 months ago
@MultiSamwel """Either 1) evolution is a very random process that does not follow the usual rules of biology and chemistry or""
No. Actually evolution goes by a process called natural selection. You are right, life wasnt CREATED through evolutionary processes. Its starts with chemical processes and when it has started it ADDAPTS by evolutionary means.
No old Y chromosome? I dont think you even know what you just stated.
gulbirk 4 months ago
@gulbirk how was 100 % left handed amino acid created in an oxygen infested planet.. we all know amino acids cannot react under these conditions..please state what quelifications you have im willing to debate.
MultiSamwel 4 months ago
@gulbirk Homochirality somehow arose in the sugars and amino acids of prebiotic soups, although there is no mechanism by which this can occur and is, in fact, prohibited by the second law of thermodynamics (law of entropy).
MultiSamwel 4 months ago
@MultiSamwel Ok, stop copy pasting things from google, if you want me to even bother to respond.
First of all, go look up what left handed and right handed amino acids actually are. Secondly, the second law of thermo dynamics deals with physics and states that energy will be drained in a closed system.
It has nothing to do with biology.
gulbirk 4 months ago
@gulbirk to have life you have to have 100% left handed amino acids.. anything else is poisen.. LOOK IT UP..
MultiSamwel 4 months ago
@MultiSamwel
If I may interveen, the paper "right handed amino acids were left behind" in the July 2nd 2006 edition of Newscientist do deal with that and explains the predominance of left handed amino acids.
Also, the earth is not a closed system since it receive energy and heat from the sun, hence, the second law of thermodynamic do not apply in the formation of the first self replicating organic molecule.
Atharkas 4 months ago
Finally some REAL science on Youtube.
Evolution = pseudo-scientific FAIRYTALE
evoTARDSareINSANE 5 months ago
@evoTARDSareINSANE You're exactly right. Creationism is real science.
AtheistSpanker 5 months ago
@AtheistSpanker
I hope FYOG that you are joking/trolling :-/
Same goes for evoTARDSareINSANE.
melis256 5 months ago
@melis256 We believe reality not lies. We can see that the Bible is true as written.
AtheistSpanker 5 months ago
did you know that moses was a plagirist and stole the ten commandments from egypts religion to start with?
vengencefrom1979 5 months ago
@vengencefrom1979 proof? something some guy on the internet said? I don't think so.........
MagnusCattus 5 months ago
A classic in strawman generation, quote-mining, ignoring inconvenient facts, and arguments from ignorance. It doesn't get more intellectually dishonest than this folks!
MuckyMcPuppy 6 months ago
These are intelligent people? If so, they have NO intellectual integrity.
MrSamuelSpade 6 months ago
there's countless of intermediates in the fossil record, for each one you mention
thesageofohio 6 months ago
Your desperate rambling will only "keep the sheep to the flock". Anyone with just one iota of critical thinking will unmask your "highly educated people" as the biblethumping, lying-for-christ creatards they are. And hopefully some of your sheep, that haven't been beaten into obedience by their parents, will have the strength and courage to get past the threat of social isolation by family and "friends" and break away from this insane cult called evangelism.
leungchaan 6 months ago
The stupid. IT burns. This video is a collection of all the creationist arguments. Debunked countless of time, misunderstanding of science and a healthy dose of dishonesty.
Mehatos 6 months ago
Highly educated uh? LOL.
In that case a turd smells great!
mecher3k 6 months ago
The quote from The Origin of Species at 3:50 is the definition of quote mining.
Creationism at its best.
Stevoukos 6 months ago
Wow, I never thought about it before, but the poorly transcripted oral traditions of people from thousands of years ago who were unversed in science have turned me around. Praise Jeebus!
kailia666 6 months ago
Wow, talk about being an ignorant fool
NBM397 6 months ago
"Truthfulness"? If the guy can't speak English, how can even come close to knowing what he is talking about?
NicolSD 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible in nature (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). Species couldn't have survived while their vital tissues, organs, biological systems were still evolving. Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species.
Mogley52 6 months ago
Ten minutes in and all I've seen are lies about the cambrian explosion. The Cambrian explosion is not evidence for creation. It was the time when animals began to hard hard parts in their bodies. And there were no bunnies in it. Oh yeah, and your flood never happened.
mrdarkevilme 6 months ago
What is so hard to understand about science's understanding of "The History of The World"?
How do the claims of the bible even remotely compete with science. It's weird to think that the bible can even compete as an explanation.
Notice how this creatard doesn't give any evidence for his position, except for stating that a book by Bronze Age sheepherders is somehow infallible. Just totally weird.
No transitional fossils in the Cambrian... except for all the soft-bodied Pre-Cambrian fossils.
CamW30 6 months ago
Unless this was recorded about 10 years ago, I'm sure that these quotes from 1994, 1996, and so on, are outdated. Cherry-picking at it's best.
MidnightDaystar 6 months ago
Re the fossil record.
a) It didn't start with the Cambrian
b) The Cambrian contains creatures of only primitive development
c) Organisms show an increase in complexity over geological time.
d) Contains many transitional species
e) fulfils Darwin's predictions
These are facts, so please don't tell lies and stick to religion which has no place in science.
pilgrimpater 6 months ago
Who is this preacher ?
What are his qualifications ?
Where is the highly intelligant person mentioned in the beggining of the video?, is there a second part ?
saintpine 6 months ago
On the same criteria, any religious fraud should prove religion false ?
At least it's the scientist that discover scientistic frauds.
saintpine 6 months ago
It's wonderful how the preacher says without shame "Great claims require real evidance".
saintpine 6 months ago
If they can't produce observable evidance why ahould I believe in a god ?
saintpine 6 months ago
This guy needs to stop. Trying to disprove evolution because it disagrees with your book isn't proving the bible.
MineCraftFish1 6 months ago
Anyone who denies evolution is mentally still a child and should not be voting or discussing any adult topic at all.
bigfilmhat 7 months ago
@bigfilmhat Exactly. Completely agree.
MW2Addiction 6 months ago
The Earth is created from the shards of a duck egg and the first man (Väinämöinen) is born to the goddess Ilmatar. Väinämöinen brings trees and life to the barren world. -Kalevala
Meaning that even if evolution would not work at all it does not automatically validate Abrahamic god. Whole thing is false dichotomy. Still require evidence of the proposed claim. 25:19 "Great claims require real evidence" is what I agree, so prove your god.
depenthene 7 months ago
Science is to be attacked when they are proven wrong and to be stopped from teaching about evolution in public schools.
Moko8298 7 months ago
scientist do the research, find evidence, develop theories - all the bible can do / does is disapprove and attack. very, very productive and convincing :) i hope alternative reasonable explanation (such as origins of life in space) will be supplied really soon - what will you do then? read the bible once again, searching for more counter-arguments? why? why is it so important to you to attack science? why is religion so intimidated by science?
1utubaccount 7 months ago
@1utubaccount Because they know they are wrong and that science will take over the world. Oh and the fact that Jehovah will just become another mythological god that never existed lmao.
MW2Addiction 6 months ago
This proves that "The Flintstones" is a documentary.........I knew it :-)
MrMaika77 8 months ago
take a basic biology class, that is all.
070257 8 months ago
Facepalm - The act of dropping one's face / forehead into one's hand. Usually accompanied by a "thunk" or a cr a cry of "D'oh!"
Chancer50 8 months ago
take a look at "vietnams infinite cave" by nat geo.you will find plant life that looks prehystoric yet dna shows no change. yet if we found this evidence in the fossil record we would state this difference to be evidence of evolution.environmental influence in a single generation with no dna shift tells us that without dna ident we will be victims of non-science.......total non-science!
edmoochie 9 months ago
@edmoochie "you will find plant life that looks prehystoric yet dna shows no change" .... what are you comparing the DNA to?
sfg911 8 months ago
what complete and total b.s.
iobjectlikewhoa 9 months ago
Not only does religion have nothing going for it..... but they continuously spew out the same fallacious arguments and lies. You don't need to look at all the evidence that shows religion isn't true... you can just look at these idiots and liars who refuse to learn simple facts while claiming to speak for their god. A real god wouldn't need apologists, liars and priests in lab coats.
sfg911 9 months ago
@sfg911 no offense but neither should science. God is real. God will reign. every knee will bow and every tongue will confess that God is Lord! thank you and God bless! (:
CallingOut101 8 months ago
@CallingOut101 Well... just claiming "science" spews out fallacious arguments isn't good enough, you actually have to demonstrate that. Sure you can find one... maybe TWO if you look hard enough. I can find 10,000 lies from theists for every 1 from a scientists. And who finds the lies from scientists??? Other scientists! Theists NEVER correct other theists except when they are arguing over what they THINK god wants.
sfg911 8 months ago
@sfg911 yeah alot of theists lie. alot of christians lie. but i'm pretty positive an atheist dont always tell the truth. if your upset enough about being proven wrong you'll make up lies. thats the bad thing with "religion." religion ruins ppl bc they get soo uptight bout everythin lol i'm not religious.. i'm a bible believing christian. I'm not really against atheism or agnostics or even scientific facts but i do know that i've seen more ppl healed from cancer by God then by science. -John 3:16
CallingOut101 8 months ago
@CallingOut101 "I'm not religious... I'm a bible believing christian" I'm not a square... I'm a 2 dimensional object with 4 sides of equal length.
"I'm not really against scientific fact... but i do know that i've seen more ppl healed from cancer by God then by science" I like law.. but I do know that more thieves toss themselves into jail than get caught by police.
You are right about one thing ... a lot of christians make up lies
sfg911 8 months ago
@sfg911 the thing in saying that being religious and christian is the same thing is really wrong. the christian religion is killing itself with people who are being stupid! the religious people who wont let you come to church bc you wear pants? thats dumb. the objective of being christian is to be Christ like. i can be christ like without being religious. and i again i cant say i dont believe in scientific fact bc the proof is there but i dont put my faith in it. how many times will science fail
CallingOut101 8 months ago
@CallingOut101 religious = christian = religion. Sorry, you can't separate this just because you don't like what some of your group is doing. If you believe Jesus rose from the dead and you need to believe this to get a special pass into heaven then you believe in a religion. Sure you can be christ like without being religious... (ignoring the fact that Jesus wasn't christ like) but if you believe you need to be christ like to appease some god then you are religious.
sfg911 8 months ago
@CallingOut101 How many times will science fail?? You need to try to fail and only through fail will you learn from your mistakes. Religion does not even try... this is like arguing you shouldn't get off the couch because people can fall.
Actually, religion DOES try to explain the world... just when it fails (and has countless times) it simply makes excuses, moves the goal post and claims it's always been correct... while whining that science didn't know everything from day one.
sfg911 8 months ago
@sfg911 your right
when scientists are wrong = learn from mistake
when religious (all religions) are wrong = ignore, deny or say the method of testing is flawed
teedonster2 8 months ago
You can't argue with someone that says "God Did It".
There are transitional fossils, but the religious won't look.
The transitional faith record is full of transitions from simple religious beliefs too much more complex belief systems! lets not forget about religion borrowing.
TABOOVSKNOWLEDGE 9 months ago
Molecular evidence is of far greater significance. It's somewhat silly to attempt to discuss the fossil record at any point in time, since we'll never know if there's more to be found. Molecular evidence, however, is there to be seen now and doesn't have the same problems just mentioned as the fossil record.
Alexdurrant7 9 months ago
the fossil record has been explained, in great detail. creationist isnt that stupid are they?
fossil are laid in the correct order evolution proves, they are not laid in some flood myth order.
yes many many many many intermediats have been found and are still being found.
this man is higher than a georgia pine.
thesageofohio 9 months ago
You don't need to have all "transitional fossils " to prove evolution is true it isn't even possible to have all "transitional fossils" because every generation of organisms is transitional form and fossilization of remains occur only in special circumstances.
zoltan6561 10 months ago
What year was this produced? It seems his arguments need to change through some modification....ohh wait no evolution.
Dulmit2010 10 months ago
missing transitional fossils = bible? WTF
SirDarkl0rd 10 months ago
@SirDarkl0rd unprovable theory = good science? WTF
edmoochie 9 months ago
@edmoochie Any theory that states that animals didn't evoved is a theory that agrees with the fossil evidence.
IloveYOUviruses 8 months ago
It's frustrating that evolutionists has been let of the hook over and over again making claims with no evidence.
Learn the ability to distinguish between truth and lies.
Stianchez 10 months ago
@Stianchez - It's frustrating to see a man like this, ignore all the evidence and blatantly lie.
Darwinsgift 10 months ago
@Darwinsgift haha, cough faked drawings, cough faked "missing links" cough foundation based on assumption (dating), cough cough ok I cleared my throat. You have to be trolling m8, you claim that there is evidence of real value that support evolutionism? Oh gosh I would love to hear it.
Did you even watch the video?
Stianchez 10 months ago
@Stianchez -Faked drawings are really just artistic impressions based on the bone structure, they may not be totally accurate. Faked fossils are due to those who seek either to discredit or profit which were found to be fake by scientific study. However feathered raptor dinosaurs have been found yet this is not mentioned as bird like breathing and bone similarities are also ignored together with beaks and nesting sites. This man thinks trilobites evolved into fish and is surprised at no proof!
Darwinsgift 10 months ago
@Darwinsgift #1 Fake drawings HAHAHA, your attempt to defend is F******* laughable. They are WAY innaccurate and I work in the buisness(Art). Compare the drawings to the real thing is a disgrace. Dont try to defend bullshit. Ok sorry I got a bit fired up, but please understand. What you are trying there is kinda ridicolouse. No offence. It would be as if I draw a cat, when trying to draw a dog.
Regarding fossils, thats awholenother topic. People are going away from the idea "Tree of life"
Stianchez 10 months ago
@Stianchez - You fell into my trap there by refuting the unimportant part of my statement and totally ignoring the essential part of my argument. Start studying fossil transitions and you will see this man for what he is! If people are moving away from the obvious proof then it shows how indoctrination by unscrupulous religious leaders is a travesty.
Darwinsgift 10 months ago
@Darwinsgift "I fell into your trap"
Ho-ho you fell into my trap aswell.... right, anyway I answered your last segment by refering to the tree of life. Which most people now start saying "Bushes of life" Where there are so many significant differences in the "early" fossils that they cannot explain it coming from one specie. It's a bit off what you wanted but it should wrap it up nicely. Taken from a paelontologist . "The lack of transitional fossils are the trade secret of paelentology"
Stianchez 10 months ago
@Stianchez - I have made a video for you, so you can see where this guy goes wrong. Check out "Riddle of the Archaeopteryx".
Darwinsgift 10 months ago
@Darwinsgift Cherio, will do
Stianchez 10 months ago
David Berlinski absolutely is not an evolutionist.
C0LLIDER 10 months ago
99% of real scientists who make their living studying evolutionary sciences are all wrong.
MrWagman11 10 months ago
That settles it. God did it. Poofed them all into existence.
MrWagman11 10 months ago
Again with the "no transitional fossils." It's time to grow up.
MrWagman11 10 months ago
It's the same with this guy as it is with most - he has a belief, and tries to conform science around it.
Tsk, tsk, tsk... Jesus Christ didn't create everything. It was God. Silly goose.
"Please do not insult them personally" - "Stop Lying, Atheists and Evolutionists"
WOW, the irony.
uxtalzon 10 months ago
Not only that, but it doesn't get him where he wants. Genesis does not become an alternative foundation for modern biology if some aspect of evolutionary theory is false. What would happen is that whatever new data was unearthed would lead to a new naturalistic theory.
Gnomefro 10 months ago
The theory of evolution gets its explanatory power from interconnections between many fields, such as genetics, paleontology, higher level biology/anatomy, physics etc. All of which converge on the tree of life documenting common descent. And this clown's response to that is to pick at some point he feels is not 100% documented, but inferred from the understanding that evolution is true(much like aircraft are built with the understanding that gravity is uniform). Such objections are irrelevant.
Gnomefro 10 months ago
Why should we not insult this retarded ignorant when the very title of your video is accusing the entire scientific community of lying and suggesting a global conspiracy that would have no purpose what so ever except screwing over your cult. This is a symptom of paranoid delusions.
If this guy was interested in the scientific answers - he could find them at amazon for a few bucks and go check out the evidence for himself at a museum of natural history.
Gnomefro 10 months ago
It makes me furious to think you are teaching children this stuff.
Very irresponsible!
Leehamism 10 months ago
You state they're highly educated. I wonder where. Anyway, maybe if fossils were easier to make (look up what it takes for nature to create a fossil), and we had everybody looking for them (not just archeologists and paleontologists, etc.) we'd have all those gaps filled in. Creationists just don't understand what a "transitional" fossil would be. There aren't going to be creatures with parts of vertebrae or half skin-half scale creatures. Evolution just doesn't work that way.
jaydavisphoto 10 months ago
@jaydavisphoto do you know what you just did?
your agreeing with the video. he is saying there is no CURRENT evidence to proof it so why teach it? if you say it is difficult then evolution is not science just faith for we have not found the missing links to back it up.
thanks
illusionistik 10 months ago
@illusionistik No I am saying that the creationists are claiming there are no transitional fossils. I say the ones looking for them are in fact finding them. Everything so far has stood up to the evolution theory. My previous comment was just to point out to the "gap" people that if we had everybody looking for fossils that we would have all the irrefutable evidence they claim we lack. They also don't realize that not everything becomes a fossil.
jaydavisphoto 10 months ago
what is a kind? define it. the only thing that would make macro evolution false, is if there is some invisible barrier that prevents species from diverging to much.. where is this evidence? your are talking out of your ASSES.. you are so brainwashed that you simply IGNORE the facts people have found about YOUR gods creation. you shun your own gods creation. you are dishonest to the core. your ilk is a sore to the human species.
sethecx 10 months ago
Don't insult him? It took this guy less than 5 minutes to start with the insults, although insulting our elected leaders is a cottage industry in most countries, but let us continue.
cplastrange 10 months ago
Great vid. All of the indignation athee/evos spew doesn't cover for the fact that their fairytale has yet to produce ONE SHRED of evidence. Science supports the Bible, all the greats from Newton to Faraday understood this clearly, it has only been since the recent delusion that man thought he knew something as fact about which he can only make blind assumptions.
salmagnum 10 months ago
Seriously. Using the bible as a reference for anything other than common philosophy, parables or bronze-age myths is a non-starter. No wonder you are wandering in the wilderness of ignorance when your sources of information are fictional.
Grow up. The world doesn't revolve around your delusions.
agroundhere 10 months ago
I love it when creationists think that the whole of the scientific community is in on one big conspiracy against their religion. It's really just as hilarious as any other conspiracy theory.
MidoriFan10 10 months ago
Why should we believe the Christians if they can't produce the evidence?
digitaljez 10 months ago 2