hazzard 16:34 in other words, the entropy of a black hole, a measure of its information content, was proportional to its surface area rather than its volume. His teaching is based on Susskind's.
That is nothing like what he said. In fact he specifically said that nothing like surface area can be an effect on the information within a volume within a singularity becuase things can be broken down. Quantum physics itself states that our observations themselves are based on systems that are interpreting the universe around us and thus you get subjective results. This is why he didn't want to answer that guys question.
in other words, forget volume-- informaton content is only dependent on surface area etc.
this is a good response video to that video "but its true to me" or something (I forgot the title) since the world is only pretending to be 3d and but its actually 2d and our brain interprets at as 3 (that's what mystics say anyway) eg Michael Talbot, David Icke (just read something about David Icke --funny).
A mad scientist?
heathey2 10 months ago
so what about LHC, if indeed a small black hole is created and sucks mass into it, will it continue to grow?
bankruptfeller 3 years ago
@bankruptfeller
it would radiate away without us ever even knowing it.
wexarexthexStorm 1 year ago
hazzard 16:34 in other words, the entropy of a black hole, a measure of its information content, was proportional to its surface area rather than its volume. His teaching is based on Susskind's.
janinemelissa22 4 years ago
That is nothing like what he said. In fact he specifically said that nothing like surface area can be an effect on the information within a volume within a singularity becuase things can be broken down. Quantum physics itself states that our observations themselves are based on systems that are interpreting the universe around us and thus you get subjective results. This is why he didn't want to answer that guys question.
*rolls eyes*
Hazzard65 4 years ago
in other words, forget volume-- informaton content is only dependent on surface area etc.
this is a good response video to that video "but its true to me" or something (I forgot the title) since the world is only pretending to be 3d and but its actually 2d and our brain interprets at as 3 (that's what mystics say anyway) eg Michael Talbot, David Icke (just read something about David Icke --funny).
janinemelissa22 4 years ago
kay
Slipperyrod1984 4 years ago
I was also thinking he said kay and okay to much...
thefakeyeti 4 years ago