All I can say is that many of this republican talker politician are just about to destroy our country, and they still praying what is call Restoring USA, how, how and how?????
I used to listen to this guy on the radio. But more and more I realize that he is not as conservative as the flaunts to be. The last drop that made me turn off the radio was his position in regard to Al Gore. He defends Al gore (unbelievable, talk about defending a character like Al Gore). He says he has massages all the time and never in his wildest imatination would he take advantage of a masseuse. I´m sure he´d like to have a male masseur, and a dick up his ass.
He is a Neocon chicken hawk. He thinks that we should have separate lines at airports for muslims. I have never heard such an absurd unconstitutional thing
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
mike gallagher, you are so fucken wrong. you are a typical white man on a desperate attempt on making sure that we don't elect a black man as president.
Please register at this website and spread the word people.
teaparty07 . com
Our goal is to get 100,000 people registered and each one of them will give a 100 dollar donation...that makes a total of 10,000,000 HUGE BUCKS! Just think of the exposure Ron Paul will get...pure madness! We need him and he needs us. Please register and please spread the word =)
Ron Paul needs your support (money) so send it and let's get moving. Garage sales, work overtime, sacrifice, eat at home, collect aluminum cans, $5 here, $10 there, don't blow your money foolishly.
Now is the time to get rid of the IRS. We will not rest.
Ron Paul is gaining ground. In the second quarter, 2.4 million raised. For the third quarter? Hopefully well past 3 million. Everyone should support Ron Paul! Let's STOP THIS WAR.
Dr Paul is laying ground for a new movement in America. We have been manipulated by media and government for decades, as America herself has been weakened by anti-White haters hiding behind the concept of "diversity" and
the "cop-of-the-world" scam thrust upon us by globalist manipulators.
Absolutely right. Ron Paul is so right on. If we don't get out of Iraq, this is going to last another 25 years, and tens of thousands of US soldiers' lives. We need to JUST COME HOME!!!
A true conservative / libertarian eliminates the government policies that destroyed the living standards of the society and caused the problems in the first place.
good job, simply saying "I rest my case!" after a rhetorical question over-rides any real proof and makes you 100% correct. buuuuuut, Ron Paul has done plenty to help the poor, as an obstetrician he would often give free medical treatment to people who couldn't afford it, not to mention the fact that he refuses to be given a government pension, and returns a portion of his congressional pay to the treasurey each year, so you're just about as wrong as it's physically possible to be.
It's the socialist policies of Kleptocrats like Clinton and Bush that have created the poor.
Ron Paul and libertarians will eliminate these policies and eliminate poverty around the world, by freeing up the people to create the wealth they want and to keep it.
actually no, that isnt true. Yes in many ways when government gets involved it usually results in market failure. But pure libertarianism is a philosophy that is based in a theory of a free market, which is full of gross assumptions. For example, people acting as rational actors with perfect, or at least near perfect information. With the growth of consumer markets, market psychology, pervasive advertising you bring about market equilibriums which are inherently social market failures.
You haven't kept up with economics. Information and advertising are both commodities and are part of the free market mechanism. People only have to look out for themselves for the free market to work.
Socialism requires perfectly honest and omniscient regulators. That's why it fails.
And it has been proven that all poverty, pollution, unemployment and war are caused, created, manufactured by government. Government programs are all socialistic and always fail. The government knows that they cause these problems, then they benefit by fooling the ignorant voters into thinking they need government to solve the problems the government created (but blamed on others).
Government will act in its iterest unless you get lucky and you get a few enlightened few, jefferson, hamiliton, madison, etc; however the markets they had were much more benign. So any negatives that were present then, no way would have outwieghed the benefits...today you must concede is a different world with different expectations, among individuals, groups, and governemnts, both for good and bad.
I dont advocate socialism by any means, the problem is that we've merged need and want into the same thing and sure advertising is a commodity just like anything else, however when the agents cant tell the different between informative advertising verses playing upon the senses and acutally dumbing down the agent. And another assumption is a nuetrality of law, which is a grosser assumption
Actually, what you are saying is not true. If you studied economics you should know that the Marginalist School PROVED mathematically, in the late 1800s that the free market always works. They proved the concepts. The proof has been extended by VonMises, Hayek, Rothbard and numerous others.
It's also true that in the Soviet Union, they spent years trying to find a model under which Socialism worked. Hundreds of academics spent decades (50s, 60s, 70s) trying to find any theoretical model that showed that government direction or intervention in the economy would worked. They concluded that only the free market would work. That is one of the main reasons Gorbachev decided to open up the system
No that isnt true, the soviet union was a totalitarian police state where party members took advantage of the people, forcing socialism is completely totalitarian...but if you seperate political liberty with property rights, can people choose socialism? Market socialism? As a libertarian, I would assume you have to let people choose there own fate, if they value employment over long term growth let em
They did do the research. They wanted to prove to the world that their system had a theoretical support model. All their attempts failed. They proved the opposite. Don't think this was done publicly. Few knew, but Gorby did.
whao there, be careful, mirco was mathmatically matured by marginalists, but that in no way proves the problems with macro analysis. I was initially highlighting the major assumptions of free enterprise, I am still an advocate of it, but until you have technocrates, something similar to the fed operations, where government wont act in its self interest, but in the interest of the principles assumed in a free market.
You rest your case on nothing but your own ignorance.
The book, written by a self described liberal who was surprised by what he found, is titled, "Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservatism, which explains the redundancy in the book's title.
You rest your case on nothing but your own ignorance.
The book, written by a self described liberal who was surprised by what he found, is titled, "Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservatism, which explains the redundancy in the book's title.
...according to "Who Really Cares," a new book by the Syracuse University public-policy specialist Arthur C. Brooks, it is liberals (especially the nonreligious sort), not conservatives, who are less likely to open their wallets to make charitable donations.
how about "A liberal sees a starving child, and sets up a department of giving sandwiches to starving children, they tax people 10 billion dollars a year for it, and then only hand out a million dollars worth of sandwiches which are made from chinese produce while the government subsidizes American farmers to not growing anything"
And it's retarded garbage like your's that's the reason why neocons and libertarians will be sent away from DC like roaches trying to escape a can of RAID.
you've got a habit of doing that, you know "blah blah blah, i'm right... I rest my case" what I said was actually a response to your comment, what you said is interchangable nonsense that you could post in response to any political comment on earth, please, at least make some effore next time, or you could just stick with "that's retarded garbage... I rest my case"
All I can say is that many of this republican talker politician are just about to destroy our country, and they still praying what is call Restoring USA, how, how and how?????
campos3391 1 year ago
I used to listen to this guy on the radio. But more and more I realize that he is not as conservative as the flaunts to be. The last drop that made me turn off the radio was his position in regard to Al Gore. He defends Al gore (unbelievable, talk about defending a character like Al Gore). He says he has massages all the time and never in his wildest imatination would he take advantage of a masseuse. I´m sure he´d like to have a male masseur, and a dick up his ass.
mexman48 1 year ago
Comment removed
rmccay88 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mexman48
He is a Neocon chicken hawk. He thinks that we should have separate lines at airports for muslims. I have never heard such an absurd unconstitutional thing
rmccay88 1 year ago
Comment removed
ERROLCUSTERFLYNN4EVR 2 years ago
Mr. Gallagher uses the American flag as toilet paper. What a nice guy!
StraightFashionMan 2 years ago
Rudi = flaming draftdodger--feared the idea of basic training--never did a pushup.
Mike Gallagher is 48--a peacetime service avoider, coward. Was a big guy, might have played football. Couldn't be bothered to serve.
Ron Paul is a veteran.
lumpagogo 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
mike gallagher, you are so fucken wrong. you are a typical white man on a desperate attempt on making sure that we don't elect a black man as president.
NANWELO 4 years ago
Read is book "Surrounded By Idiots" and you'll see how wrong you are.
I don't agree with him on many things, but he's certainly no racist.
FirstResponder911 3 years ago
that is a great book
republican360 2 years ago
A Leader of INTEGRITY and ACTION.
COMMUNICATES to the People NOT "What We WANT to Hear" but "What WE NEED to Know"
Truth, Justice, Freedom/Liberty, PEACE
"Power to the PEOPLE"
whadaphoc 4 years ago 4
Does anyone ask Huckabee if his winning is a realistic possibility? Do they express skepticism to Thompson's face? Of course not.
ItsFazsha 4 years ago 3
They did all the time actually... Huckabee was asked every interview almost.
chukmaty 3 years ago
This question makes no sense.
MidstreamHorse 4 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Please register at this website and spread the word people.
teaparty07 . com
Our goal is to get 100,000 people registered and each one of them will give a 100 dollar donation...that makes a total of 10,000,000 HUGE BUCKS! Just think of the exposure Ron Paul will get...pure madness! We need him and he needs us. Please register and please spread the word =)
CodeNameMusic 4 years ago
mike gallagher is a warmongering Zionist propagandist and NWO bootlicker. RonPaulRevolution2oo8
livanletliv 4 years ago
this sounds to me this is a honest man' to bad the evil politicians in control will not allow him to win a primary
mb2bennett 4 years ago 4
A concerned but hopeful Australian supports you, Ron.
Logic will prevail against the establishment's nasty tactics. Just keep speaking!
GluttonD 4 years ago 10
Ron Paul, The most flawless voting record "EVER" in congress!! When honesty counts vote RON PAUL>>08'
AiresQX4 4 years ago 13
Vote for this man- you'll be voting for world peace!
JonaBarcl 4 years ago 17
Their is no difference between Hillary Clinton and George W. Bush.
rjshmo 4 years ago 17
Ron Paul needs your support (money) so send it and let's get moving. Garage sales, work overtime, sacrifice, eat at home, collect aluminum cans, $5 here, $10 there, don't blow your money foolishly.
Now is the time to get rid of the IRS. We will not rest.
nomadak47 4 years ago 10
America loves Ron Paul!
Do not listen to the mainstream media, Ron Paul CAN and will must win!
Bring back Americas freedom!
Vote Ron Paul!!!!
highLIFEkelso 4 years ago 12
Go Ron Paul... 2008 and, why not, 2012
maranelloboy 4 years ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
There is no evidence that Mitt is CFR. People assume he because he is wealthy and has corporate connections.
delquattro 4 years ago
Ron Paul is gaining ground. In the second quarter, 2.4 million raised. For the third quarter? Hopefully well past 3 million. Everyone should support Ron Paul! Let's STOP THIS WAR.
goneresistance 4 years ago 7
Great Show!
de79hill 4 years ago
Dr Paul is laying ground for a new movement in America. We have been manipulated by media and government for decades, as America herself has been weakened by anti-White haters hiding behind the concept of "diversity" and
the "cop-of-the-world" scam thrust upon us by globalist manipulators.
Craigbe 4 years ago 2
great interview, thanks for putting it up !
Ron Paul 2008
ShiekYerbooty 4 years ago
CANADA loves your ideas Ron
JimmyBootts 4 years ago 5
too rite!
KhanShehar 4 years ago
Absolutely right. Ron Paul is so right on. If we don't get out of Iraq, this is going to last another 25 years, and tens of thousands of US soldiers' lives. We need to JUST COME HOME!!!
cmanw 4 years ago
America Stands Behind Ron Paul! Go Ron Paul! 2008!
bt071971 4 years ago 5
RON PAUL
RonPaulVoters 4 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ron Paul will NEVER be allowed in the White House.
RXTRUX1 4 years ago
you want to bet every cent in your pocket?
can you feel it, times are a changing.
ron paul 2008
N0diggityN0doubt 4 years ago 4
ronpaulforpresident2008. com
saynotoslavery 4 years ago
A liberal sees a starving child and gives them a sandwich.
A conservative sees a starving child and gives them a bible.
A libertarian sees a starving child and puts up a privacy fence so they don't have to see that shit any more.
mhirtes12 4 years ago
A true conservative / libertarian eliminates the government policies that destroyed the living standards of the society and caused the problems in the first place.
skicentral 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ever see a conservative or Loonietarian EVER do ANYTHING to help the poor?
Ever??
I rest my case!
mhirtes12 4 years ago
you never had a case to rest. and speaking in general terms for broad groups of people, you look like a fool.
can you feel it, times are a changing.
ron paul 2008
N0diggityN0doubt 4 years ago
good job, simply saying "I rest my case!" after a rhetorical question over-rides any real proof and makes you 100% correct. buuuuuut, Ron Paul has done plenty to help the poor, as an obstetrician he would often give free medical treatment to people who couldn't afford it, not to mention the fact that he refuses to be given a government pension, and returns a portion of his congressional pay to the treasurey each year, so you're just about as wrong as it's physically possible to be.
luke666808g 4 years ago 5
It's the socialist policies of Kleptocrats like Clinton and Bush that have created the poor.
Ron Paul and libertarians will eliminate these policies and eliminate poverty around the world, by freeing up the people to create the wealth they want and to keep it.
WonjuEnglishSchool 4 years ago 2
actually no, that isnt true. Yes in many ways when government gets involved it usually results in market failure. But pure libertarianism is a philosophy that is based in a theory of a free market, which is full of gross assumptions. For example, people acting as rational actors with perfect, or at least near perfect information. With the growth of consumer markets, market psychology, pervasive advertising you bring about market equilibriums which are inherently social market failures.
SeanT228 4 years ago
You haven't kept up with economics. Information and advertising are both commodities and are part of the free market mechanism. People only have to look out for themselves for the free market to work.
Socialism requires perfectly honest and omniscient regulators. That's why it fails.
WonjuEnglishSchool 4 years ago
And it has been proven that all poverty, pollution, unemployment and war are caused, created, manufactured by government. Government programs are all socialistic and always fail. The government knows that they cause these problems, then they benefit by fooling the ignorant voters into thinking they need government to solve the problems the government created (but blamed on others).
WonjuEnglishSchool 4 years ago
Government will act in its iterest unless you get lucky and you get a few enlightened few, jefferson, hamiliton, madison, etc; however the markets they had were much more benign. So any negatives that were present then, no way would have outwieghed the benefits...today you must concede is a different world with different expectations, among individuals, groups, and governemnts, both for good and bad.
SeanT228 4 years ago
I dont advocate socialism by any means, the problem is that we've merged need and want into the same thing and sure advertising is a commodity just like anything else, however when the agents cant tell the different between informative advertising verses playing upon the senses and acutally dumbing down the agent. And another assumption is a nuetrality of law, which is a grosser assumption
SeanT228 4 years ago
Actually, what you are saying is not true. If you studied economics you should know that the Marginalist School PROVED mathematically, in the late 1800s that the free market always works. They proved the concepts. The proof has been extended by VonMises, Hayek, Rothbard and numerous others.
WonjuEnglishSchool 4 years ago 2
It's also true that in the Soviet Union, they spent years trying to find a model under which Socialism worked. Hundreds of academics spent decades (50s, 60s, 70s) trying to find any theoretical model that showed that government direction or intervention in the economy would worked. They concluded that only the free market would work. That is one of the main reasons Gorbachev decided to open up the system
WonjuEnglishSchool 4 years ago 2
No that isnt true, the soviet union was a totalitarian police state where party members took advantage of the people, forcing socialism is completely totalitarian...but if you seperate political liberty with property rights, can people choose socialism? Market socialism? As a libertarian, I would assume you have to let people choose there own fate, if they value employment over long term growth let em
SeanT228 4 years ago
They did do the research. They wanted to prove to the world that their system had a theoretical support model. All their attempts failed. They proved the opposite. Don't think this was done publicly. Few knew, but Gorby did.
WonjuEnglishSchool 4 years ago
whao there, be careful, mirco was mathmatically matured by marginalists, but that in no way proves the problems with macro analysis. I was initially highlighting the major assumptions of free enterprise, I am still an advocate of it, but until you have technocrates, something similar to the fed operations, where government wont act in its self interest, but in the interest of the principles assumed in a free market.
SeanT228 4 years ago
You rest your case on nothing but your own ignorance.
The book, written by a self described liberal who was surprised by what he found, is titled, "Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservatism, which explains the redundancy in the book's title.
delquattro 4 years ago
You already posted that. You have Alzheimer's or something?
mhirtes12 4 years ago
You rest your case on nothing but your own ignorance.
The book, written by a self described liberal who was surprised by what he found, is titled, "Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservatism, which explains the redundancy in the book's title.
delquattro 4 years ago
Sorry, these damn 500 character limits.
...according to "Who Really Cares," a new book by the Syracuse University public-policy specialist Arthur C. Brooks, it is liberals (especially the nonreligious sort), not conservatives, who are less likely to open their wallets to make charitable donations.
delquattro 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Yes, ONE guy makes some claim that you want to hear, so it MUST be true, huh?
(rolls eyes)
mhirtes12 4 years ago
can you feel it, times are a changing.
ron paul 2008
N0diggityN0doubt 4 years ago 2
Yes, they are changing. Neocons will be out in '08, and Loonietarians will go down in flames.
mhirtes12 4 years ago
Too bad, mhirtes12 hasn't figured out that Hillary is a neo-con globalist, too, which is why she won't pull out of Iraq, either.
delquattro 4 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What makes you "think" I support Hillary?
mhirtes12 4 years ago
how about "A liberal sees a starving child, and sets up a department of giving sandwiches to starving children, they tax people 10 billion dollars a year for it, and then only hand out a million dollars worth of sandwiches which are made from chinese produce while the government subsidizes American farmers to not growing anything"
luke666808g 4 years ago 4
And it's retarded garbage like your's that's the reason why neocons and libertarians will be sent away from DC like roaches trying to escape a can of RAID.
mhirtes12 4 years ago
you've got a habit of doing that, you know "blah blah blah, i'm right... I rest my case" what I said was actually a response to your comment, what you said is interchangable nonsense that you could post in response to any political comment on earth, please, at least make some effore next time, or you could just stick with "that's retarded garbage... I rest my case"
luke666808g 4 years ago
Where is the second part?????????????????????
Twiztedklown316 4 years ago
good interview.
PizzaGod 4 years ago
Where is the second part of this?
themaclady 4 years ago
Go Ron Paul!
eeconrad 4 years ago 2