Thank you. Please see my Orthodox Christian video promotions on youtube under 'marykfilms.' My upcoming documentary will contain some surprising revelations about the shrouded sacred history of all mankind. Would you be willing to be interviewed for the documentary?
Scientists only explenation for giant rock formations / mountains was that magma pushed it upward and thus mountains were formed but later on they discovered that mountains actually had foundations and were rooted into the earth .modern geo-physics has established deep crustal roots for the axio parts of mountains at converging plate boundry's as mentioned in the Qur'an 1400 years ago - And He has affixed into the earth mountains standing firm, lest it should shake with you... Noble Qur'an 16:15
The BIble is the only logical way to explain the pyramids - Giants.
Also i hate the people here that pretend to be channeling ''alien'' spirits of so-called ''pleiadans''
and those that actually buy that crap - im just surprised how atheists dont worry about planets bumping into eachother then scientists explain it away with theories about gravity and magnetism which all are signs of Gods' existance, since the sun is exactly the right distance from earth in order for life to be sustained.
Isn't Ethopia supposed to be one of those states that declares war on Israel as described in Ezekiel chapters 38 & 39? For this reason alone I don't believe that Ethopia has the Ark of the covenant.
DOES ANYONE READ OR STUDY THE BIBLE ANYMORE ??? ( Revelation 11: 9 ) And the temple of God was opened in heaven, and there was seen in his temple the ark of his testament: and there were lightnings, and voices, and thundering, and an earthquake, and great hail.
@Strefanasha His ministry is not evangelism, but teachings on topics that mature Christians are interested in studying. His teachings help Pastors like me, look for signs of the return of Jesus, which is part of the gospel...He is coming back soon...here are the signs....
@neartochrist2 his hyperrationalistic approach assumes that the Bible is written with total precision. it is not , it was written in the common tongue of common people. taking the book more literally than he should leads missler to absurd conclusions, like the alleged hidden message in the names of genesis 6.
the book is more akin to poetry than maths. now i am no liberal but the challenge is to unpack the apparent contradictions arising from a loose style, not seeking the hidden
If the ark exists it would be the archelogical find of the century, but remember the stone with the hebrew writing that stated it was part of Solomons Temple But on further examination it was found out to be a forgery. But we all know its in a warehouse in the USA
@WildBarley67 No, the Ark of the Covenant has not been found...I believe the Ethiopians may have it, or perhaps the Mercy Seat that sat upon the Ark, as Scripture does state that Ethiopia will bear a great gift to Christ when He returns.
Ron Wyatt, as well as Bob Cornuke, discovered Noah's Ark, the ship that endured the Great Flood.
@DallasTheGreat28 I thought that for a while too, but to be honest, you shouldn't be dogmatic about things within the Bible that aren't stated outright. There's no problem with having an opinion, and saying "I don't know about this topic." I'm just saying be careful with what you classify under truth, make sure it's just that
@MrWaddefak GOD HOLY WORD IN HOLY BIBLE dont think divine to you and dont matter to you sadly most important thing in your life should GOD HOLY WORD and you dont care !
@MrWaddefak HOLY BIBLE ALL 66 BOOK are created by people who woes GUIDED BY HOLY SPIRIT/FATHER GOD and HOLY BIBLE is literate GOD HOLY WORD where ALMIGHTY GOD LORD YHWH TESTIFY OF PAST-PRESENT-FUTURE HISTORY OF THIS WORLD NARRATOR SPEAKER IS GOD because of that you can read in HOLY BIBLE from point of view of PERSON who know all from all angles and even what people think in planing of some wicked malice evil deeds one who describing all events in HOLY BIBLE IS HOLY ETERNAL GOD YHWH
i could go on and on with this list of bizarre, barbaric and not in any way relevant verses. i really dont think these are the work of the creator of universes.
@MrWaddefak You dont listen HOLY BIBLE IS ACCURATE BOOK OF HISTORY REPORTS THAT GOD TESTIFY created in that way to reavel wicked human heart and wicked unbelivers se few verses in HOLY BIBLE and start to JUDGE ALMIGHTY GOD spiritual blind and dead dont understend that HOLY GOD YHWH LISTEN 24/7 all words that people speak and no arogance wicked will be saved from HELLFIRE only humble people will se mercy OF ALMIGHTY GOD LORD YHWH
@MrWaddefak YES GENESIS IS ACCURATE DESCRIPTION OF GOD CREATION Where did you find number of 6000years NOWHERE IN HOLY BIBLE time & date is set IT SPEAK OF DAYS OF CREATION OF EARTH
@MrWaddefak Listen this GOOD-GOD HOLY WORD IN HOLY BIBLE-teaching people to LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOUR- LOVE YOUR ENEMY-DONT MURDER-DONT COMIT ADULTARY-DONT STEAL-DONT LIE-HONOUR MOTHER AND FATHER-LOVE YOUR GOD WITH ALL YOUR HEART MIND AND SOUL -DONT FALSE ACCUSE YOUR BROTHER -REMEMBER TO KEEP SABBATH HOLY all this command of HOLY ETERNAL GOD YHWH that people are REJECT from GOD HOLY WORD are main reason why society crumbling more more in darkness & violance and this is not superstition but TRUTH
@MrWaddefak did you ever try to read HOLY BIBLE GOD HOLY WORD to find elaboration WHY all this verses speak in this way HOLY ETERNAL GOD YHWH have good reasons why he woes act in some way that spitritual blind can not understend are you person that reading book only few pages and start to JUDGE BOOK my advice to you READ ALL HOLY BIBLE GOD HOLY WORD and than mybe you will able to understend WHY and BECAUSE GOD HAVE GOOD REASON FOR ALL HIS ACTIONS EVEN IF IS MATTER OF PUNISHMENT
@MrWaddefak Psalm 137 ,9 speak of Israel people who are taken in babylonian slavery people who are suffer this psalm should be read from 1-9 and emotions of this people is describ in this PSALM like most people who would feel the same way if someone would come and attack your home and kill all your family 2Kings 18,27 Describing Israel People who are under Attack of Assyrian army and in this description can be seen what Israel people woes do to survive DESCRIPTION OF ACCURATE HISTORY
For the truth about religion & top Bible scholarship try Robert M. Price, ' The reason driven life '. Also Dan Barker, Valerie Tarico, John W. Loftus, Victor J. Stenger. For humanity's shared moral core & belief in Matt 7v12 The Golden Rule try wisdomcommons. Also try comparative religion- read the 1500BCE papyrus of Ani & the Koran & Book of Mormon on skepticsannotatedbible.
You blaspheme God accusing him of incitement to rape and murder,and then bleat about name calling,your own words accuse you,blaspemers are satanic and therefore evil in nature,you are a blashemer,I did not call you name,s I merely stated a fact,as is clear for all to read.
Had anyone heard of Missler, or any other person for that matter, to explain why the Bible in the Old Testament has God encouraging Moses and his people to rape and/or kill their victims?
@thenakedangler Listen, don't start blurting names to me. I'm a Christian. Why don't you research it for yourself. LIKE I DID. And then come back with some answers, not more questions!
@ buttface You're too closed minded to continue spending time debating with, this will be my last response to you. God Bless You and I will put you in my prayers for your eternal salvation to replace eternal damnation in Hell.
We all have two options:
1) believe in Jesus and have everything to gain if we're right, nothing to lose if wrong.
2) Believe in humans alone, and nothing to gain if your right, everything to lose in Hell if you're wrong. That's a bad bet for your life my friend!
@stealth07r1 Well since you don't care for discussion, I won't continue. However, your option #1 is fundamentally flawed, you do have something to lose if you are wrong. What if the Muslims are correct? That means you go to that hell, if the Jews are correct, you go to that hell. Why bother with Pascals wager? It is complete nonsense. Also, I am aware you didn't say creation science, you said "non-secular" science. And, I encourage you to E-mail an accreditted biologist.
@ buttface Lastly, Do you even understand IR or just quote names from wiki or whatever old and humanistically biased science papers? BTW: I never said Creation Science.
IR: lets get to it - flagellar motor. Every part of an electrostatic motor is represented here in seperate atomic structures for each: the shaft, stator, bearing, ring, coil, etc... If one part doesn't work, total fail - no evolving to make it better. Simplest form is to complex to happen by chance, thus info. = design!
@gregrutz No you worship God who created the sun and try to figure out the way he made it and how it works, by using your intelligence to try to understand and comprehend a higher intelligence. It challenges us to do research. Finding out how the sun operates is less important than how we treat and serve one another with love and forgiveness. Do you want your children to be nuclear physicist, but to dumb to live right and maintain proper relationships? It's all about priority!
@Ramohog No, I believe Gravity made the sun and praying to a god is a waste of time. And yes I would want my childern to be nuclear physicists rather than be born in the south.
@gregrutz What you don't seem to realize that there are physical laws as well as spiritual laws. You have to know and understand both systems to get the maximum out of life. Jesus came down to teach us the spiritual laws. The physical laws prove God and intelligence behind information, coding, strcture and desig rather that randomness without any intelligence did it.
@gregrutz A law is an established principle which works every time you apply it to life. Yes we killed him which shows the depravity of mankind. Yes God can be proven. He is the one who designed the underlying structure of the snowflakes which are in a static state of reduced entropy. He encourages us to discover this in Job 38:22 Hast thou entered into the treasures of the snow?
@gregrutz Yes we do have a God given conscience (which is not some evolutionary by-product) but gets affected by being emotionally ruled by the circumstances, which is the true curse of the garden. Jesus came down to teach us how to be led by the Spirit in order to allign these emotions in a way that is pleasing to God and beneficial for mankind.
@gregrutz Well degeneration with all it's consequences is part of the curse. Jesus came to reverse the curse for restored relationship with God through His Holy Spirit, who can instantly fix everything if we would only have faith in what Jesus has done on our behalf. Blaming God for our predicaments while choosing to reject His ways and operate under the curse is a huge fallacy and shows the spiritual blindness of mankind.
@ buttface Are you done? Upon realizing that we are not going to positively influence eachother with the attach arguments and debates, I thought it might be a positive gesture just to share with you with good intentions.
I'm sorry to learn how closed minded you are. It's your will and God's timing regarding your heart, so I digress on sharing Jesus.
Ye of such little faith. If you can only believe in what you can see, measure, or understand; what limited thinking. God is much bigger!
@ buttface All I can do is show a gesture of kindness toward you by sharing to you out of the Love that I have because Jesus changed my heart, changed my character completely; that is beyond men.
I beg of you and any others reading, take your spiritual future very seriously. If you think this body we live in is all life is made of, oh the dissappointment when the truth is revealed.
If you're curious or unsure, I dare you to say a small prayer to Jesus...just talk to him, He's waiting!
@ buttface That free gift is available to us just by believing in Jesus as our Savior. God planned for our redemption long before we existed. Jesus died on the cross willingly for you and me. He took the beating of all our sins upon himself because he loved us first! He took our place so that when we die, we are not subject to the penalty of sin.
Don't you want to be certian about your spirit life after you die? You have NOTHING to lose and EVERYTHING to gain! Eternal life w/ our Creator!
@ buttface Okay look, I'm going to quote info from non-liberal, non-secular science, and your going to quote liberal, secular media science sources; we're already going in circles; not so fruitful...
I want to share to you, out of love, that only Jesus Christ makes possible.
He loves you and me the same. He died for our sins, that we might have eternal life after our bodies die. We're all sinners, we're imperfect. Yet we don't have to be perfect, just accept the free gift God Gave us.
@stealth07r1 Instead of preaching, you should perhaps defend your original argument about the irreducible complexity of beavers. I've been preached at many times, obviously it hasn't done any good, and for one specific reason. There is absolutely no reason to believe in any of that nonsense. And what is "non-secular science"? Creation science? There is no such thing. Creation "scientists" do not actually do science, they don't even publish peer-reviewed articles, they rely on misinformation.
@stealth07r1 There is no such thing as secular or nonsecular science either, science is science. Never has modern science postulated the supernatural as an explanation for anything, if it did, it has been discarded for exactly the same reason Intelligent Design is. You can not conduct an experiment with an omnipotent God involved. How do you scientifically demonstrate that God created life? You obviously have no particular reason to defend your argument, which is why you preached at me.
@stealth07r1 I suggest you restrain yourself from preaching, preaching does not advance the discussion. When you begin preaching, I can make the reasonable inference that you have given up and acknowledged your defeat. As I suggested to you, E-mail a legitimate, accreditted biologist with your irreducible complexity argument. If they don't have a response, publish a paper somewhere, and wait for it to get dissected and demonstrated to be erroneous with their superior understanding of biology.
I feel very, very sorry for anyone who refuses Jesus Christ and His Father, Jehovah God. They have given themselves to a huge variety of lies of every sort. The atheists WILL discover (when it's too late) that there IS a God; much to their horror! What awaits them in the Lake of Fire, for eternity, is far more than any of our minds can every begin to conceive. Seek King Jesus while you're still alive. You only have everything to gain, and only your sins to loose. Grace and peace to all.
@buttface You just proved my point for me: "Everything contains a complex structure and information, even each individual atom". Exactly...so where did the complex information & structure for the first atom come from?
You have no idea, but claim Creationists cling to "God of the Gaps". Hypocracy gone apeshit!
Flagellum tail not a motor....dude it's EXACTLY a motor, research it.
...and the super obscure guy you claim debunked Irriducible Complexity has no credential, blah....
@stealth07r1 For some reason I was not notified when you replied, and your responses were only brought to my attention by someone else. However, perhaps you should read the wikipedia page of hemoglobinopathy, they are not all fatal. I'm no expert, but neither are you. As for the Big Bang, I don't know where the energy came from, nor does anyone else, nor do you. Does that mean we must conclude that a God did it be default? That would be an argument from ignorance, and that is what you present.
@stealth07r1 "You need a lifeform showing transitional elements between humans to more primitive creatures"
Again, wikipedia. We have thousands of transitional fossils for a majority of species we see today, they are all linked with DNA and phylogenetic trees. We can use evolution to predict where fossils may be, and the depth at which they will most likely reside. That is precisely how we found the transitional species for the whale. Or perhaps you were only referring to human lineage.
@stealth07r1 However, your bold assertion that all transitional fossils have been proven to be hoaxes or mistakes is an argument from ignorance. Perhaps you were led to believe this from people affiliated with the discovery institute, ray comfort, kent hovind, lee strobel, kirk cameron, etc... I suggest you watch a few convenient DonExodus2 videos that clearly and validly refute these assertions with the actual information, as opposed to the oversimplified information from creationists.
@stealth07r1 "You have no idea, but claim Creationists cling to "God of the Gaps". Hypocracy gone apeshit!"
I don't see the hypocrisy, you actually demonstrated exactly what I originally stated. However, the information came from the laws of physics, thermodynamics, and the physical properties of the matter at that time. You said I don't know where the information came from, even if I didn't, you are resorting to a God of the Gaps argument.
@stealth07r1 Ken Miller is not an obscure biologist, he is actually well known for his involvement in the Dover trial which essentially expelled Intelligent Design and Irreducible Complexity from the public school system, and for damn good reasons. He has a Ph.D in biology and taught at Harvard for 6 years, and now he teaches at Brown University. He is no an obsure biologist. However, Irriducible Complexity is different from evolution, even Michael Behe accepts common descent.
there's some interesting info here but I don't buy it. I believe "the mouth of God" is an expression. God speaks something and it happens. It just means that God used Necho to get His word out.
@ buttface It takes far greater faith and stretching of the imagination (once you've been educated on the complexity of life) to believe it happened randomly by itself as in Evolution; or in the idea of the Big Bang, whereby there was once NOTHING, and then it EXPLODED!
A lesser leap in Faith is to accept God as the source of Creation and from where all Design came. We find rediculously high level design in everything. It serves to point toward God. Jesus loves you and I the same! =)
@buttface They still exist because their DNA has instructions for them to. When cells duplicate incorrectly and DNA strands have mistakes and errors compared to the original, that's called desease, cancers, etc...and things die or never grow.
They don't make new life. Computer programs with code errors don't make newer more complex programs with higher intelligence, they just fail!
It's called Entropy! from order to chaos...observed in 100% of the universe!
@stealth07r1 I think you are referring to a mutation when you mention erroneous duplications of DNA strands, they are not deseases and cancers. Some deseases are genetic and others aren't, so you need to specify. Most mutations are neutral, some are good, and some are bad, obviously the bad ones will be discarded and the good ones will produce offspring. I think your computer code analogy comes from the analogy commonly used to describe the structure and function of DNA.
@stealth07r1 However, your computer program analogy is a flawed analogy, therefore that is another logical fallacy. DNA is not actually a code, like the bacterial flagellum is not actually a motor, they are analogies. Entropy is the second law of thermodynamics, however that only applies to a closed system, such as the vast universe in which we live in. Our insignificant planet however, has a giant ball of gas beaming excessive amounts of energy at us 24/7, which we also happen to orbit.
@stealth07r1 You also demonstrated your misconception of the Big Bang Theory. We do not know what was before the singularity which began the universe, so you cannot accurately claim there was nothing. Also, the Big Bang was not an explosion, it is a process called inflation, which evenly expands at an increasing rate in all directions and angles. I admit life is complex, but how is that an argument for creation? Hos is complexity even relevant?
@stealth07r1 Evolution suggests we gradually reached our current state of complexity. We have not evolved to percieve the vast time scale necessary for noticable evolution to occur in species such as ourselves, smaller and larger. In species of insects or small animals that have relatively short life spans, even less than a year, we have documented accounts that evolution occured, even too the point where the new species cannot reproduce with its ancestors, which is the defintion of a species.
@stealth07r1 How do you know that the universe is designed? Looks can be decieving. It appears as though everything in the Universe orbits our planet, however, upon further investigation, we reach an alternative explanation. Design is merely a concept of comparison to a nondesigned object, like a building compared to an insignificant cave. What does a nondesigned universe look like? We live in this universe, in this solar system, and on this planet, because all three facilitate our life forms.
@joejohnson043 Well it can be applied to anything. But if your response to evolution is "looks can be decieving" and therefore its creation, I can say the same thing in response and we get nowhere. There are limits to that concept. Every scientific theory or principle has surpassed that logic once it graduated from hypothesis, however they are still subject to discourse, and can be debunked if contrary evidence is forthcoming. However, that's rare with concrete theories like general relativity.
@joejohnson043 My point to stealth07r1 was that his design argument is unfounded and not science. There is no method of scientific investigation that is applicable to his design hypothesis, it cannot be varified. That is why "looks can be decieving" is applicable under these circumstances. If his hypothesis is a mere inference and not subject to investigation, then he cannot determine the accuracy of his hypothesis, and it can neither be demonstrated to be false or true. That is not science.
@buttface What Evolutionists simply can't answer is, where the information came from. They can't even touch it. I'll help you: Our wonderful Creator, our Lord God, who created us with purpose, that's where it came from! Would you rather have bubbled up from a puddle of mudd or been created by our Loving God. Expect better for yourself.
Fun question for you anti-creationists: if we evolved from monkeys, birds, fish, tadpoles, etc... then why do all these animals still exist? ooops...
@stealth07r1 You basically resorted to a God of the Gaps argument. Just because science does not yet have a 100% demonstrable and valid answer to the question, does not mean you can posit whatever you want. That is an argument form ignorance, which also happens to be a logical fallacy. There is no sufficient evidence that suggests a God was involved, holy books and scripture are not valid evidence to support a claim.
@buttface112211 it does when the book calls the reality out thousands of years before man knew about it.
If you think Religious figures were possibly incorrect, corrupt, lying, cheating etc., how can you hold 'scientists' above the same possible motives? Their income and fame is on the line, you think they are not going to do what they have to do to make some money? Human nature shows its capability of following the herd and complementing the Emperor's new clothes. (peer review.. just sayin)
@joejohnson043 Well now we have identified the problem, it's not just evolution, it seems you have an issue with science as a whole. If you think scientists are possibly incorrect, corrupt, lying, cheating etc., how can you hold "religious figures" above the same possible motives? Their income and fame is on the line, you think they are not going to do what they have to do to make some money? Human nature shows its capablity of following the herd and complementing the Emperor's new clothes.
@buttface112211 its already long established in our popular culture to consider religious 'leaders' in a negative light. The trend however, is to hold Scientists above having any possible conflicts of interest. They always seek the truth we are told, and hold the ideals of Science in such high esteem, that they couldn't possible be fraudulent.
I don't hold 'religious figures' above having corrupt motives. Missler's presentations are on concepts, facts and the Bible. He tells you to check out the info for yourself. This is what a good Scientist would do as well. Too many 'scientists' merely wish to become our New World Order priesthood. Their decrees cannot be questioned. Didn't you notice the 'global warming' science (oh, yeah, rebranded to 'climate change'), where the scientist who didn't fall inline were chatised as deniers?
@stealth07r1 The animals and other species we evolved from still exist because we didn't evolve from our modern day animals. Evolution is continuous as long as there is life present on the Earth, and changing conditions as well as seperations of gene pools. You clearly lack a basic understanding of evolution, perhaps you should take a few hours to study it one of these days. Creationists are not a valid source for biological information, use credible and legitimate sources.
@buttface Missler's area of expertise(other than Bible) is Information Sciences, which will inherently cover a field like biology(sourcing modern experts).
Ur statement is rediculous. Evolutionists state there is no designer or higher power but that life evolved from a simple cell, which they can't even define. The elemental components, amino acids, etc contain complex structure & information systems. Ur missing the whole point. Research the term 'irreducible complexity' sometime!
@stealth07r1 check out Yuri Bezmenov, the KBG attacked us and made our nation a bunch of Useful Idiots. These wont see the truth even if its in front of them. It doesn't matter about the logic, they refuse to see it. The Scientific Method is only a philosophical idealism now, they wont use it. lol
@stealth07r1 Irreducible complexity has been demonstrated to be wrong by Ken Miller and other biologists. Evidently Missler did not do very well in his Information Science classes, because he lacks even a rudimentary understanding of evolution if he really thinks it includes the origin of life. the amino acids and proteins necessary for life have been demonstrated to be created by purely natural means. Everything contains a complex structure and information, even each individual atom.
@stealth07r1 Complex structure and information is irrelevant. You should study the Kitzmiller v. Dover trial of 2005 where Behe was asked if he had read peer-reviewed articles of the life forms and functions of which he claims are irreducibly complex, he hadn't read most of them. Intelligent Design is an argument from ignorance, and it has not been demonstrated to be remotely true, and it isn't even a testable hypothesis. He appeals to the supernatural, and that defies the principle of science.
@stealth07r1 Oh, one more thing. Evolution and atheism are not mutually exclusive, there are atheists that reject evolution, and creationists that embrace it, such as Ken Miller. Evolution does not state that that there is no designer, not all atheists are an atheist because they embraced evolution. Evolution states nothing more than the gradual and incremental changes in life over time. Evolutionists who claim there is no designer, do so because of their atheism, not evolution.
I just discovered Chuck Missler and I was a little cautious when I heard his videos on UFOs but I've found he is very sound in Biblical teaching. I'm very impressed with him. I wish I would have found him a long time ago. he's like a genious!
he's honest, and never adds scripture or takes away. true follower/makes many connections i feel were God led for him to find by spirit in us believers
I believe the shed blood of Jesus Christ HAD to be sprinkled onto the Mercy Seat as the thousands of sacrificed animals blood that was sprinkled onto the seat forshadowed. I believe what CM has discovered is an ancient relic/copy and the real Ark is in Israel right now, and has always been there... I love CM teachings....thanks
i love "fingerprints of the holy spirit" talk and also secrets in the torah. letter spacing over whole chapters in bible found in 1800's. not computer codes, holy spirit codes!
Prophet or not, this fellow is truly an indispensable encyclopedia of knowledge who was chosen to relay some incredible stuff to us. Not many other men that I've seen have the ability to express such a wealth of knowledge with such humor, humility and candor. I pray for his health more than anything else simply because there's not enough time to translate and absorb all the things he has to say. I'm glad he's not shy...
@newaver64 This man thinks that evolution explains the creation of life (it doesn't). He thinks that peanut butter disproves evolution. He thinks that because new life is not created in peanut butter (which does not contain the essential materials for life) that God must have done it. This man is ignorant and so are a majority of his declarations. This man merely fuels conspiracy theories and deliberately misleads and misguides people.
@brittneyk007 yes he is, he is one who is worth hearing all he has to say. those who chuckle over what he has to say, well they will be begging for our help but it will be too late. one day soon its gonna hit the fan and folks will wish they hadn't been blowing off God's word!
@brittneyk007 he is not a prophet he is a teacher. I don't recall him ever making a prophecy, what he says is common sense and this is what he says about himself
@togowack prophecy isn't just foreknowledge. it is any speaking of the truth of God as led by The Holy Spirit(past present or future). but it doesn't matter if he is a "great" man whatever that is, all that matters is that his message is true, which is why that is the distinguishing characteristic of a prophet. :)
@nothin2pruv Amen to that. There was one man in the temple who knew he wouldn't die before he held the savior of the world in his hands. These kinds of revelations can keep a guy going.
@brittneyk007 A prophet? This man thinks that evolution explains the creation of life. He thinks that peanut butter disproves evolution. He thinks that because new life is not created in peanut butter (which does not contain the essential materials for life) that God must have done it. If you call him a prophet, so be it, but I will challenge that merely because of the many ignorant remarks this man declares as true. He merely fuels conspiracy theories and attempts to disprove reality.
@buttface112211 "This man thinks that evolution explains the creation of life".... no he doesn't! The problem is that our country is full of Useful Idiots (you may want to look up the term, and see who calls us that) who no longer see the truth in front of their face. If you need to find a secular explanation for this situation, look up a video by Yuri Bezmenov.
@buttface112211 i watched that video, I've seen it before, it's correct. Why would you link it to bolster your case? Everyone knows the discovery of DNA destroyed the Evolutionist's religion. It only survives because our nation is infested with Useful Idiots. Watch Yuri Bezmenov. It's not a 'conspiracy theory', its a conspiracy fact!
@joejohnson043 Perhaps I shall go over everything that is incorrect in the video. First off, evolution has nothing to do with the beginning of life. It merely explains the gradual change of time that gave us the species we have now. Evolution starts after life is created. Also, we know what chemicals and minerals must be present to create life, such as various forms of amino acids and proteins. Experiments demonstrate that these chemicals can come about through purely natural means.
@buttface112211 now you want to play semantics about evolution? Just like Global warming became Climate Change... who can argue with 'climate change'? That's what the climate does.... marketing/propaganda bs.
DNA is code, mutations destroy code! Why don't you get into your computer's console and start deleting and scrambling your Operating Systems programing, see if it evolves into something.... The only real 'evolution' that occurs is from traits that are already present in the DNA
@joejohnson043 DNA is not a code, that is just a commonly used analogy do describe the function of DNA. Mutations do not destroy "code", the scramble it and create something new. Most mutations are neutral, some are bad, and some are good. Your computer anology is flawed. Genes can be changed and still function properly, computers unfortunately do not share that characteristic. I assume you watch Kent Hovind often, he says the same garbage, get your facts from legitimate sources.
@buttface112211 I don't know who Kent Hovind is, never heard of him. DNA is a code, you just don't like how it destroys your worldview so you want to rename it. Do you really believe if a herd of cows swim in the tide for 10 million years, they are going to get a blowhole and some fins?
@joejohnson043 Evolution is a worldview? DNA is not a code, it is an analogy, just the bacteria flagellum is called a motor, it isn't actually a motor, it just has a similar function and similar characteristics. You basically said before that you only accept microevolution and reject macroevolution, despite that fact the macroevolution just occurs over a longer time scale. By the way, whales did not "get" a blowhole and fins. You clearly lack a rudimentary understanding of evolution.
@buttface112211 I know whales didn't 'get' a blowhole, because they were cows or wolves until they decided they 'needed' to evolve a blowhole and fins.... only at that point were they actually a whale....
lets take feathers, didn't that start as a pimple and 20 million years later, that pimple became a feather? Seriously, wake up, and realize you've been deceived by kgb & others(research Yuri Bezmenov) who screwed up our entire nation's ability to utilize common sense....
@joejohnson043 Whales did not evolve a blowhole. Their nose changed position and function over time. And they did not go from a species of cow to a whale. There are atleast 5 confirmed transitional species that have been found. I watched Yuri Bezmenov. How do you know he is a legitimate source for information? How do you know he is telling the truth? How is this relevant to evolution, and if its only in America, how do you reconcile this with the fact that Europeans accept evolution too?
@buttface112211 regarding Yuri, that video was from 1984, and we see the ramifications of those tactics. The reason I know its legit, is because these are standard tactics any patient adversary would employ, it was put in print by Sun Tzu Thousands of years ago. Our politicians are corrupt and require funding, so they were either short sighted or corrupt enough to not stop it, though at the time of McCarthy some tried didn't they?
@joejohnson043 How do you equate politicians necessity for funding and the KGB implementing war tactics on Americans so they lose their ability to utilize common sense? I don't see the correlation. Perhaps you should avoid conspiracy theories. Just because a country could do it, does not mean they did do it. You haven't provided varifiable evidence for it, you've merely asserted that we have a corrupt government, and you haven't identified the link between them, elaborate.
@joejohnson043 Peanut butter does not contain any of these crucial elements that are required to make life. No scientist will ever tell you that matter+energy=life. Missler is guilty of mispresentation of facts to support his agenda. This man has no history in biology, perhaps you should be getting your facts from credible sources. Also, the scientific field that deals with the creation of life is called A-biogenesis. Anyone can stand behind a podium and arrange facts into a conspiracy theory.
@brittneyk007 No, he is not, prophets are given info from God directly,from God or through other means that God has specifically told them or sent them. He's just a regular man, claiming to be saved, probably is, who seems to be very smart and well studied in scripture. To say he is a prophet is overboard, and I would consider not even uttering that if your a believer of God.
@Shadowlooker12 before Christ came there was no holy spirit. It only came to the prophets. That exact same spirit lives in those who have Christ. The truth is Jesus and whoever speaks about the truth under the holy spirit and teaches Gods word is a prophet. Jesus is the ultimate truth and revelation, the Old Testament always pointed to him. True prophets speak about the Gospel
@brittneyk007 ~If you have followed Missler for a long time, I would suspect that you have virtually no formal education and are completely unacquaintted with science in any form. Missler is a congenital liar and a scientific illiterate.
@ pontecanis: if you have followed missler as much as I have, and have the done "your homework", you would realize that he doesn't use scripture to prove script. He shows scripture's super-dimensional origin and trust worthiness first.
@ pontecanis: if you have followed missler as much as I have, and have the done "your homework", you would realize that he doesn't use scripture to prove script. He shows scripture's super-dimensional origin and trust worthiness first. Look up dr Gerald schroeder and the science of God as suggested my missler
This should be "Stealing the Mind"...Missler is the master of intrigue, alright. All of this talk can be subsumed under the heading Fallacy of Appeal to Authority: quoting scripture to prove scripture is a fallacy, and always false.
@joejohnson043 ~Quoting scripture to prove scripture is an Appeal to Authority, and is always false. I finished my philosophy classes in 1972, so have had a while to get used to the concept. You might try a course, though. You apparently need one.
@joejohnson043 By definition, a fallcy is always false. if it is not false, it is not a fallacy. It is entirely reasionable to quote scripture to indicate what the scripture SAYS [eg. Genesis is the 1st bookin the bible and it starts: "in the beginning"], but that type of quotation does not claim the bible to be expert on a given topic, merely to indicate contents.
Thank you. Please see my Orthodox Christian video promotions on youtube under 'marykfilms.' My upcoming documentary will contain some surprising revelations about the shrouded sacred history of all mankind. Would you be willing to be interviewed for the documentary?
marykfilms 18 hours ago
Scientists only explenation for giant rock formations / mountains was that magma pushed it upward and thus mountains were formed but later on they discovered that mountains actually had foundations and were rooted into the earth .modern geo-physics has established deep crustal roots for the axio parts of mountains at converging plate boundry's as mentioned in the Qur'an 1400 years ago - And He has affixed into the earth mountains standing firm, lest it should shake with you... Noble Qur'an 16:15
robZzdaboss 2 weeks ago
Also - if there is no oxygen in space then how can the sun burn? doesnt fire require oxygen?
robZzdaboss 2 weeks ago
@robZzdaboss Do you know anything about nuclear fusion? It's not 'burning' in the same way we burn a piece of wood.
madouc575 1 week ago
The BIble is the only logical way to explain the pyramids - Giants.
Also i hate the people here that pretend to be channeling ''alien'' spirits of so-called ''pleiadans''
and those that actually buy that crap - im just surprised how atheists dont worry about planets bumping into eachother then scientists explain it away with theories about gravity and magnetism which all are signs of Gods' existance, since the sun is exactly the right distance from earth in order for life to be sustained.
robZzdaboss 2 weeks ago
@robZzdaboss They've excavated workers camps near the pyramids. No giants.
madouc575 1 week ago
Moses had "several wives"?
truthbknwn 2 weeks ago
@gregrutz Not making up anything..... just keeping it biblical... perfectly in line with reality, science and history.
Ramohog 3 weeks ago
Isn't Ethopia supposed to be one of those states that declares war on Israel as described in Ezekiel chapters 38 & 39? For this reason alone I don't believe that Ethopia has the Ark of the covenant.
PhilipK100 3 weeks ago
DOES ANYONE READ OR STUDY THE BIBLE ANYMORE ??? ( Revelation 11: 9 ) And the temple of God was opened in heaven, and there was seen in his temple the ark of his testament: and there were lightnings, and voices, and thundering, and an earthquake, and great hail.
undergroundtreasure 1 month ago
does missler ever preach the gospel? every time i have heard him he is hieing off on side issues like this.
what does the ark of the covenant matter to us. the One sacrifice is made, all that preceded it was typology, prefiguring image.
and we seek the type, to forsake the real for the image?
Strefanasha 1 month ago
@Strefanasha His ministry is not evangelism, but teachings on topics that mature Christians are interested in studying. His teachings help Pastors like me, look for signs of the return of Jesus, which is part of the gospel...He is coming back soon...here are the signs....
neartochrist2 1 month ago
@neartochrist2 his hyperrationalistic approach assumes that the Bible is written with total precision. it is not , it was written in the common tongue of common people. taking the book more literally than he should leads missler to absurd conclusions, like the alleged hidden message in the names of genesis 6.
the book is more akin to poetry than maths. now i am no liberal but the challenge is to unpack the apparent contradictions arising from a loose style, not seeking the hidden
Strefanasha 1 month ago
If the ark exists it would be the archelogical find of the century, but remember the stone with the hebrew writing that stated it was part of Solomons Temple But on further examination it was found out to be a forgery. But we all know its in a warehouse in the USA
malkaraatgw1 1 month ago
Didnt Ron Wyatt discover the Ark in the catacombs at the Skull in Golgotha....? Makes more sense that he did...
WildBarley67 1 month ago
@WildBarley67 No, the Ark of the Covenant has not been found...I believe the Ethiopians may have it, or perhaps the Mercy Seat that sat upon the Ark, as Scripture does state that Ethiopia will bear a great gift to Christ when He returns.
Ron Wyatt, as well as Bob Cornuke, discovered Noah's Ark, the ship that endured the Great Flood.
BreathOFLaminin 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Can anybody recommend a good religion/ paranormal/ UFO-type discussion forum?
TungstenKid 1 month ago
Elohim is love
sotservant 3 months ago
The ark of the covenant was under the cross when jesus died....
DallasTheGreat28 3 months ago
@DallasTheGreat28 I thought that for a while too, but to be honest, you shouldn't be dogmatic about things within the Bible that aren't stated outright. There's no problem with having an opinion, and saying "I don't know about this topic." I'm just saying be careful with what you classify under truth, make sure it's just that
vanduiam88 2 months ago
Comment removed
mRwhite298 5 months ago
@mRwhite298 lol.. for real?
MrWaddefak 4 months ago
@MrWaddefak PLease take 1 hour and read JOHN BOOK DIVINE REVELATION halleluYAHWEH GOD FATHER SON HOLY SPIRIT
mRwhite298 4 months ago
@mRwhite298 yeah.. i dont really think it's divine, so it doesn't really matter to me..
btw, your caplock seems to be on, maybe you could fix that?
MrWaddefak 4 months ago
@MrWaddefak GOD HOLY WORD IN HOLY BIBLE dont think divine to you and dont matter to you sadly most important thing in your life should GOD HOLY WORD and you dont care !
mRwhite298 4 months ago
@mRwhite298 what exactly makes you think it's the divine word of god?
MrWaddefak 4 months ago
@MrWaddefak HOLY BIBLE ALL 66 BOOK are created by people who woes GUIDED BY HOLY SPIRIT/FATHER GOD and HOLY BIBLE is literate GOD HOLY WORD where ALMIGHTY GOD LORD YHWH TESTIFY OF PAST-PRESENT-FUTURE HISTORY OF THIS WORLD NARRATOR SPEAKER IS GOD because of that you can read in HOLY BIBLE from point of view of PERSON who know all from all angles and even what people think in planing of some wicked malice evil deeds one who describing all events in HOLY BIBLE IS HOLY ETERNAL GOD YHWH
mRwhite298 4 months ago
@mRwhite298 Psalm 137:9 2 Kings 18:27 Deuteronomy 21:18-21 Mark 14:51-52 Ezekiel 16:17 Deuteronomy 23:1 1 Samuel 18:25-27
i could go on and on with this list of bizarre, barbaric and not in any way relevant verses. i really dont think these are the work of the creator of universes.
MrWaddefak 4 months ago
@MrWaddefak You dont listen HOLY BIBLE IS ACCURATE BOOK OF HISTORY REPORTS THAT GOD TESTIFY created in that way to reavel wicked human heart and wicked unbelivers se few verses in HOLY BIBLE and start to JUDGE ALMIGHTY GOD spiritual blind and dead dont understend that HOLY GOD YHWH LISTEN 24/7 all words that people speak and no arogance wicked will be saved from HELLFIRE only humble people will se mercy OF ALMIGHTY GOD LORD YHWH
mRwhite298 4 months ago
@mRwhite298 nope, it's not accurate at all, actually.
i suppose you think genesis 1:1 is ''accurate''. we weren't created 6000 years ago ;)
MrWaddefak 4 months ago
Comment removed
mRwhite298 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrWaddefak YES GENESIS IS ACCURATE DESCRIPTION OF GOD CREATION Where did you find number of 6000years NOWHERE IN HOLY BIBLE time & date is set IT SPEAK OF DAYS OF CREATION OF EARTH
mRwhite298 4 months ago
@mRwhite298 i'm going to stop this now.
MrWaddefak 4 months ago
@MrWaddefak Shalom and praise MOST HIGH GOD LORD YAHWEH(GOD FATHER SON HOLY SPIRIT)
mRwhite298 4 months ago
@mRwhite298 yeah, same to you, except for the superstitious bullshit..
MrWaddefak 4 months ago
@MrWaddefak Listen this GOOD-GOD HOLY WORD IN HOLY BIBLE-teaching people to LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOUR- LOVE YOUR ENEMY-DONT MURDER-DONT COMIT ADULTARY-DONT STEAL-DONT LIE-HONOUR MOTHER AND FATHER-LOVE YOUR GOD WITH ALL YOUR HEART MIND AND SOUL -DONT FALSE ACCUSE YOUR BROTHER -REMEMBER TO KEEP SABBATH HOLY all this command of HOLY ETERNAL GOD YHWH that people are REJECT from GOD HOLY WORD are main reason why society crumbling more more in darkness & violance and this is not superstition but TRUTH
mRwhite298 4 months ago
@MrWaddefak did you ever try to read HOLY BIBLE GOD HOLY WORD to find elaboration WHY all this verses speak in this way HOLY ETERNAL GOD YHWH have good reasons why he woes act in some way that spitritual blind can not understend are you person that reading book only few pages and start to JUDGE BOOK my advice to you READ ALL HOLY BIBLE GOD HOLY WORD and than mybe you will able to understend WHY and BECAUSE GOD HAVE GOOD REASON FOR ALL HIS ACTIONS EVEN IF IS MATTER OF PUNISHMENT
mRwhite298 4 months ago
@MrWaddefak Psalm 137 ,9 speak of Israel people who are taken in babylonian slavery people who are suffer this psalm should be read from 1-9 and emotions of this people is describ in this PSALM like most people who would feel the same way if someone would come and attack your home and kill all your family 2Kings 18,27 Describing Israel People who are under Attack of Assyrian army and in this description can be seen what Israel people woes do to survive DESCRIPTION OF ACCURATE HISTORY
mRwhite298 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
For the truth about religion & top Bible scholarship try Robert M. Price, ' The reason driven life '. Also Dan Barker, Valerie Tarico, John W. Loftus, Victor J. Stenger. For humanity's shared moral core & belief in Matt 7v12 The Golden Rule try wisdomcommons. Also try comparative religion- read the 1500BCE papyrus of Ani & the Koran & Book of Mormon on skepticsannotatedbible.
zytigon 5 months ago
You blaspheme God accusing him of incitement to rape and murder,and then bleat about name calling,your own words accuse you,blaspemers are satanic and therefore evil in nature,you are a blashemer,I did not call you name,s I merely stated a fact,as is clear for all to read.
thenakedangler 5 months ago
Had anyone heard of Missler, or any other person for that matter, to explain why the Bible in the Old Testament has God encouraging Moses and his people to rape and/or kill their victims?
ouluvme2 5 months ago
@ouluvme2 Where in the bible doe,s Yaweh your creator, encourage rape?Tell me evil one, where?
thenakedangler 5 months ago
@thenakedangler Listen, don't start blurting names to me. I'm a Christian. Why don't you research it for yourself. LIKE I DID. And then come back with some answers, not more questions!
ouluvme2 5 months ago
Mr. Missler has the gift of interpretation of information
inspectedby303 7 months ago 6
@inspectedby303 and BS
vesperus1981 4 months ago
@inspectedby303 Too bad he can't explain the evidence like dinosaurs with feathers.
gregrutz 1 month ago
@ buttface You're too closed minded to continue spending time debating with, this will be my last response to you. God Bless You and I will put you in my prayers for your eternal salvation to replace eternal damnation in Hell.
We all have two options:
1) believe in Jesus and have everything to gain if we're right, nothing to lose if wrong.
2) Believe in humans alone, and nothing to gain if your right, everything to lose in Hell if you're wrong. That's a bad bet for your life my friend!
stealth07r1 7 months ago
@stealth07r1 Well since you don't care for discussion, I won't continue. However, your option #1 is fundamentally flawed, you do have something to lose if you are wrong. What if the Muslims are correct? That means you go to that hell, if the Jews are correct, you go to that hell. Why bother with Pascals wager? It is complete nonsense. Also, I am aware you didn't say creation science, you said "non-secular" science. And, I encourage you to E-mail an accreditted biologist.
buttface112211 7 months ago
@stealth07r1 "Simplest form is to complex to happen by chance, thus info. = design!"
Evolution is not based on chance, if I remember correctly, I have already identified that rather important misconception of yours.
buttface112211 7 months ago
@ buttface Lastly, Do you even understand IR or just quote names from wiki or whatever old and humanistically biased science papers? BTW: I never said Creation Science.
IR: lets get to it - flagellar motor. Every part of an electrostatic motor is represented here in seperate atomic structures for each: the shaft, stator, bearing, ring, coil, etc... If one part doesn't work, total fail - no evolving to make it better. Simplest form is to complex to happen by chance, thus info. = design!
stealth07r1 7 months ago 6
@stealth07r1 The Sun is complex, I don't understand the nuclear reactions in it's center, so I worship Ra the Sun God.
Snowflakes are designed by the snowflake God.
gregrutz 1 month ago
@gregrutz No you worship God who created the sun and try to figure out the way he made it and how it works, by using your intelligence to try to understand and comprehend a higher intelligence. It challenges us to do research. Finding out how the sun operates is less important than how we treat and serve one another with love and forgiveness. Do you want your children to be nuclear physicist, but to dumb to live right and maintain proper relationships? It's all about priority!
Ramohog 3 weeks ago
@Ramohog No, I believe Gravity made the sun and praying to a god is a waste of time. And yes I would want my childern to be nuclear physicists rather than be born in the south.
gregrutz 3 weeks ago
@gregrutz What you don't seem to realize that there are physical laws as well as spiritual laws. You have to know and understand both systems to get the maximum out of life. Jesus came down to teach us the spiritual laws. The physical laws prove God and intelligence behind information, coding, strcture and desig rather that randomness without any intelligence did it.
Ramohog 3 weeks ago
@Ramohog What is a spiritual law? The muslims stone woman who are raped.
''Jesus came down to teach us '' and we killed him ?!?
''The physical laws prove God '' Ahhhhh, NO. You can't prove God.
Are snowflakes designed?
gregrutz 3 weeks ago
@gregrutz A law is an established principle which works every time you apply it to life. Yes we killed him which shows the depravity of mankind. Yes God can be proven. He is the one who designed the underlying structure of the snowflakes which are in a static state of reduced entropy. He encourages us to discover this in Job 38:22 Hast thou entered into the treasures of the snow?
Ramohog 3 weeks ago
@Ramohog A Law in Science is a math formula.
Yes God [the Flying Spaghetti Monster] made the forces of nature.
How can a snowflake become more structured and have less entropy?
gregrutz 3 weeks ago
@Ramohog Mankind did not know right from wrong before Jesus was born?
gregrutz 3 weeks ago
@gregrutz Yes we do have a God given conscience (which is not some evolutionary by-product) but gets affected by being emotionally ruled by the circumstances, which is the true curse of the garden. Jesus came down to teach us how to be led by the Spirit in order to allign these emotions in a way that is pleasing to God and beneficial for mankind.
Ramohog 3 weeks ago
@Ramohog Yes and I have God given Parkinson's Disease, Thank's Jesus.
gregrutz 3 weeks ago
@gregrutz Well degeneration with all it's consequences is part of the curse. Jesus came to reverse the curse for restored relationship with God through His Holy Spirit, who can instantly fix everything if we would only have faith in what Jesus has done on our behalf. Blaming God for our predicaments while choosing to reject His ways and operate under the curse is a huge fallacy and shows the spiritual blindness of mankind.
Ramohog 3 weeks ago
@Ramohog Degeneration? Curse? What religion are you making up?
gregrutz 3 weeks ago
@ buttface Are you done? Upon realizing that we are not going to positively influence eachother with the attach arguments and debates, I thought it might be a positive gesture just to share with you with good intentions.
I'm sorry to learn how closed minded you are. It's your will and God's timing regarding your heart, so I digress on sharing Jesus.
Ye of such little faith. If you can only believe in what you can see, measure, or understand; what limited thinking. God is much bigger!
stealth07r1 7 months ago
@ buttface All I can do is show a gesture of kindness toward you by sharing to you out of the Love that I have because Jesus changed my heart, changed my character completely; that is beyond men.
I beg of you and any others reading, take your spiritual future very seriously. If you think this body we live in is all life is made of, oh the dissappointment when the truth is revealed.
If you're curious or unsure, I dare you to say a small prayer to Jesus...just talk to him, He's waiting!
stealth07r1 7 months ago
@ buttface That free gift is available to us just by believing in Jesus as our Savior. God planned for our redemption long before we existed. Jesus died on the cross willingly for you and me. He took the beating of all our sins upon himself because he loved us first! He took our place so that when we die, we are not subject to the penalty of sin.
Don't you want to be certian about your spirit life after you die? You have NOTHING to lose and EVERYTHING to gain! Eternal life w/ our Creator!
stealth07r1 7 months ago
@ buttface Okay look, I'm going to quote info from non-liberal, non-secular science, and your going to quote liberal, secular media science sources; we're already going in circles; not so fruitful...
I want to share to you, out of love, that only Jesus Christ makes possible.
He loves you and me the same. He died for our sins, that we might have eternal life after our bodies die. We're all sinners, we're imperfect. Yet we don't have to be perfect, just accept the free gift God Gave us.
stealth07r1 7 months ago
@stealth07r1 Instead of preaching, you should perhaps defend your original argument about the irreducible complexity of beavers. I've been preached at many times, obviously it hasn't done any good, and for one specific reason. There is absolutely no reason to believe in any of that nonsense. And what is "non-secular science"? Creation science? There is no such thing. Creation "scientists" do not actually do science, they don't even publish peer-reviewed articles, they rely on misinformation.
buttface112211 7 months ago
@stealth07r1 There is no such thing as secular or nonsecular science either, science is science. Never has modern science postulated the supernatural as an explanation for anything, if it did, it has been discarded for exactly the same reason Intelligent Design is. You can not conduct an experiment with an omnipotent God involved. How do you scientifically demonstrate that God created life? You obviously have no particular reason to defend your argument, which is why you preached at me.
buttface112211 7 months ago
@stealth07r1 I suggest you restrain yourself from preaching, preaching does not advance the discussion. When you begin preaching, I can make the reasonable inference that you have given up and acknowledged your defeat. As I suggested to you, E-mail a legitimate, accreditted biologist with your irreducible complexity argument. If they don't have a response, publish a paper somewhere, and wait for it to get dissected and demonstrated to be erroneous with their superior understanding of biology.
buttface112211 7 months ago
I feel very, very sorry for anyone who refuses Jesus Christ and His Father, Jehovah God. They have given themselves to a huge variety of lies of every sort. The atheists WILL discover (when it's too late) that there IS a God; much to their horror! What awaits them in the Lake of Fire, for eternity, is far more than any of our minds can every begin to conceive. Seek King Jesus while you're still alive. You only have everything to gain, and only your sins to loose. Grace and peace to all.
ramjetrabbit 7 months ago
@buttface You just proved my point for me: "Everything contains a complex structure and information, even each individual atom". Exactly...so where did the complex information & structure for the first atom come from?
You have no idea, but claim Creationists cling to "God of the Gaps". Hypocracy gone apeshit!
Flagellum tail not a motor....dude it's EXACTLY a motor, research it.
...and the super obscure guy you claim debunked Irriducible Complexity has no credential, blah....
etc...
stealth07r1 8 months ago
@buttface WOW, your many blogs are tiresome at best.
define Hemoglobinopathy...? It's one 'bit' (like that? ;) ) of information out of place & it's fatal! 1000's examples like this.
Big Bang.. the energy that caused Inflation came from where??
Evolution. Proof doesn't exist; this isn't even science. You need a lifeform showing transitional elements between humans to more primitive creatures!
NONE EXIST! Claimed examples have ALL been proven known hoaxes or mistakes! STUDY!!!
stealth07r1 8 months ago
@stealth07r1 For some reason I was not notified when you replied, and your responses were only brought to my attention by someone else. However, perhaps you should read the wikipedia page of hemoglobinopathy, they are not all fatal. I'm no expert, but neither are you. As for the Big Bang, I don't know where the energy came from, nor does anyone else, nor do you. Does that mean we must conclude that a God did it be default? That would be an argument from ignorance, and that is what you present.
buttface112211 7 months ago
@stealth07r1 "You need a lifeform showing transitional elements between humans to more primitive creatures"
Again, wikipedia. We have thousands of transitional fossils for a majority of species we see today, they are all linked with DNA and phylogenetic trees. We can use evolution to predict where fossils may be, and the depth at which they will most likely reside. That is precisely how we found the transitional species for the whale. Or perhaps you were only referring to human lineage.
buttface112211 7 months ago
@stealth07r1 However, your bold assertion that all transitional fossils have been proven to be hoaxes or mistakes is an argument from ignorance. Perhaps you were led to believe this from people affiliated with the discovery institute, ray comfort, kent hovind, lee strobel, kirk cameron, etc... I suggest you watch a few convenient DonExodus2 videos that clearly and validly refute these assertions with the actual information, as opposed to the oversimplified information from creationists.
buttface112211 7 months ago
@stealth07r1 "You have no idea, but claim Creationists cling to "God of the Gaps". Hypocracy gone apeshit!"
I don't see the hypocrisy, you actually demonstrated exactly what I originally stated. However, the information came from the laws of physics, thermodynamics, and the physical properties of the matter at that time. You said I don't know where the information came from, even if I didn't, you are resorting to a God of the Gaps argument.
buttface112211 7 months ago
@stealth07r1 Ken Miller is not an obscure biologist, he is actually well known for his involvement in the Dover trial which essentially expelled Intelligent Design and Irreducible Complexity from the public school system, and for damn good reasons. He has a Ph.D in biology and taught at Harvard for 6 years, and now he teaches at Brown University. He is no an obsure biologist. However, Irriducible Complexity is different from evolution, even Michael Behe accepts common descent.
buttface112211 7 months ago
Chuck is a genius!
lorigc2003 8 months ago
@lorigc2003 A slick quack. An eloquent snake-oil vendor.
tallliza 8 months ago
Blah Blah Blah by buttface112211
Did Chaos self set Law? Did Noise self create Music? Did Sand self build Computer? Did Metal self made Robot?
Thanks to PBS BBC NOVA brain washing our young American very well.
AuthenticUSA 8 months ago
there's some interesting info here but I don't buy it. I believe "the mouth of God" is an expression. God speaks something and it happens. It just means that God used Necho to get His word out.
DragomirSA 8 months ago
@ buttface It takes far greater faith and stretching of the imagination (once you've been educated on the complexity of life) to believe it happened randomly by itself as in Evolution; or in the idea of the Big Bang, whereby there was once NOTHING, and then it EXPLODED!
A lesser leap in Faith is to accept God as the source of Creation and from where all Design came. We find rediculously high level design in everything. It serves to point toward God. Jesus loves you and I the same! =)
stealth07r1 8 months ago
@buttface They still exist because their DNA has instructions for them to. When cells duplicate incorrectly and DNA strands have mistakes and errors compared to the original, that's called desease, cancers, etc...and things die or never grow.
They don't make new life. Computer programs with code errors don't make newer more complex programs with higher intelligence, they just fail!
It's called Entropy! from order to chaos...observed in 100% of the universe!
stealth07r1 8 months ago
@stealth07r1 I think you are referring to a mutation when you mention erroneous duplications of DNA strands, they are not deseases and cancers. Some deseases are genetic and others aren't, so you need to specify. Most mutations are neutral, some are good, and some are bad, obviously the bad ones will be discarded and the good ones will produce offspring. I think your computer code analogy comes from the analogy commonly used to describe the structure and function of DNA.
buttface112211 8 months ago
@stealth07r1 However, your computer program analogy is a flawed analogy, therefore that is another logical fallacy. DNA is not actually a code, like the bacterial flagellum is not actually a motor, they are analogies. Entropy is the second law of thermodynamics, however that only applies to a closed system, such as the vast universe in which we live in. Our insignificant planet however, has a giant ball of gas beaming excessive amounts of energy at us 24/7, which we also happen to orbit.
buttface112211 8 months ago
@stealth07r1 You also demonstrated your misconception of the Big Bang Theory. We do not know what was before the singularity which began the universe, so you cannot accurately claim there was nothing. Also, the Big Bang was not an explosion, it is a process called inflation, which evenly expands at an increasing rate in all directions and angles. I admit life is complex, but how is that an argument for creation? Hos is complexity even relevant?
buttface112211 8 months ago
@stealth07r1 Evolution suggests we gradually reached our current state of complexity. We have not evolved to percieve the vast time scale necessary for noticable evolution to occur in species such as ourselves, smaller and larger. In species of insects or small animals that have relatively short life spans, even less than a year, we have documented accounts that evolution occured, even too the point where the new species cannot reproduce with its ancestors, which is the defintion of a species.
buttface112211 8 months ago
@stealth07r1 How do you know that the universe is designed? Looks can be decieving. It appears as though everything in the Universe orbits our planet, however, upon further investigation, we reach an alternative explanation. Design is merely a concept of comparison to a nondesigned object, like a building compared to an insignificant cave. What does a nondesigned universe look like? We live in this universe, in this solar system, and on this planet, because all three facilitate our life forms.
buttface112211 8 months ago
@buttface112211 apply the logic you used in this statement to your view of evolution. "looks can be deceiving."
joejohnson043 7 months ago
@joejohnson043 Well it can be applied to anything. But if your response to evolution is "looks can be decieving" and therefore its creation, I can say the same thing in response and we get nowhere. There are limits to that concept. Every scientific theory or principle has surpassed that logic once it graduated from hypothesis, however they are still subject to discourse, and can be debunked if contrary evidence is forthcoming. However, that's rare with concrete theories like general relativity.
buttface112211 7 months ago
@joejohnson043 My point to stealth07r1 was that his design argument is unfounded and not science. There is no method of scientific investigation that is applicable to his design hypothesis, it cannot be varified. That is why "looks can be decieving" is applicable under these circumstances. If his hypothesis is a mere inference and not subject to investigation, then he cannot determine the accuracy of his hypothesis, and it can neither be demonstrated to be false or true. That is not science.
buttface112211 7 months ago
@buttface What Evolutionists simply can't answer is, where the information came from. They can't even touch it. I'll help you: Our wonderful Creator, our Lord God, who created us with purpose, that's where it came from! Would you rather have bubbled up from a puddle of mudd or been created by our Loving God. Expect better for yourself.
Fun question for you anti-creationists: if we evolved from monkeys, birds, fish, tadpoles, etc... then why do all these animals still exist? ooops...
stealth07r1 8 months ago
@stealth07r1 You basically resorted to a God of the Gaps argument. Just because science does not yet have a 100% demonstrable and valid answer to the question, does not mean you can posit whatever you want. That is an argument form ignorance, which also happens to be a logical fallacy. There is no sufficient evidence that suggests a God was involved, holy books and scripture are not valid evidence to support a claim.
buttface112211 8 months ago
@buttface112211 it does when the book calls the reality out thousands of years before man knew about it.
If you think Religious figures were possibly incorrect, corrupt, lying, cheating etc., how can you hold 'scientists' above the same possible motives? Their income and fame is on the line, you think they are not going to do what they have to do to make some money? Human nature shows its capability of following the herd and complementing the Emperor's new clothes. (peer review.. just sayin)
joejohnson043 8 months ago
@joejohnson043 Well now we have identified the problem, it's not just evolution, it seems you have an issue with science as a whole. If you think scientists are possibly incorrect, corrupt, lying, cheating etc., how can you hold "religious figures" above the same possible motives? Their income and fame is on the line, you think they are not going to do what they have to do to make some money? Human nature shows its capablity of following the herd and complementing the Emperor's new clothes.
buttface112211 8 months ago
@buttface112211 its already long established in our popular culture to consider religious 'leaders' in a negative light. The trend however, is to hold Scientists above having any possible conflicts of interest. They always seek the truth we are told, and hold the ideals of Science in such high esteem, that they couldn't possible be fraudulent.
joejohnson043 7 months ago
I don't hold 'religious figures' above having corrupt motives. Missler's presentations are on concepts, facts and the Bible. He tells you to check out the info for yourself. This is what a good Scientist would do as well. Too many 'scientists' merely wish to become our New World Order priesthood. Their decrees cannot be questioned. Didn't you notice the 'global warming' science (oh, yeah, rebranded to 'climate change'), where the scientist who didn't fall inline were chatised as deniers?
joejohnson043 7 months ago
@joejohnson043 That is just how easy your remark can be reversed, it also demonstrated your hypocrisy.
buttface112211 8 months ago
@stealth07r1 The animals and other species we evolved from still exist because we didn't evolve from our modern day animals. Evolution is continuous as long as there is life present on the Earth, and changing conditions as well as seperations of gene pools. You clearly lack a basic understanding of evolution, perhaps you should take a few hours to study it one of these days. Creationists are not a valid source for biological information, use credible and legitimate sources.
buttface112211 8 months ago
@buttface Missler's area of expertise(other than Bible) is Information Sciences, which will inherently cover a field like biology(sourcing modern experts).
Ur statement is rediculous. Evolutionists state there is no designer or higher power but that life evolved from a simple cell, which they can't even define. The elemental components, amino acids, etc contain complex structure & information systems. Ur missing the whole point. Research the term 'irreducible complexity' sometime!
stealth07r1 8 months ago
@stealth07r1 check out Yuri Bezmenov, the KBG attacked us and made our nation a bunch of Useful Idiots. These wont see the truth even if its in front of them. It doesn't matter about the logic, they refuse to see it. The Scientific Method is only a philosophical idealism now, they wont use it. lol
joejohnson043 8 months ago
@stealth07r1 Irreducible complexity has been demonstrated to be wrong by Ken Miller and other biologists. Evidently Missler did not do very well in his Information Science classes, because he lacks even a rudimentary understanding of evolution if he really thinks it includes the origin of life. the amino acids and proteins necessary for life have been demonstrated to be created by purely natural means. Everything contains a complex structure and information, even each individual atom.
buttface112211 8 months ago
@stealth07r1 Complex structure and information is irrelevant. You should study the Kitzmiller v. Dover trial of 2005 where Behe was asked if he had read peer-reviewed articles of the life forms and functions of which he claims are irreducibly complex, he hadn't read most of them. Intelligent Design is an argument from ignorance, and it has not been demonstrated to be remotely true, and it isn't even a testable hypothesis. He appeals to the supernatural, and that defies the principle of science.
buttface112211 8 months ago
@stealth07r1 Oh, one more thing. Evolution and atheism are not mutually exclusive, there are atheists that reject evolution, and creationists that embrace it, such as Ken Miller. Evolution does not state that that there is no designer, not all atheists are an atheist because they embraced evolution. Evolution states nothing more than the gradual and incremental changes in life over time. Evolutionists who claim there is no designer, do so because of their atheism, not evolution.
buttface112211 8 months ago
studycenter.come
come and learn.
Krystal7862 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Harold Camping was RIGHT about May 21, click on my channel to see...
youneekk 8 months ago
This man has peiced everything into one big picture for me. Life holds no confusion for me. I only wish to share what I have learned from Mr. Missler
DeejaySmitt 9 months ago 2
This guy is the truth, and he doesn't mind sharing his knowledge
Bdorseysr 10 months ago
I just discovered Chuck Missler and I was a little cautious when I heard his videos on UFOs but I've found he is very sound in Biblical teaching. I'm very impressed with him. I wish I would have found him a long time ago. he's like a genious!
Dlbns 10 months ago
How about the Peanut Butter Chuck?
joyboard 10 months ago
he's honest, and never adds scripture or takes away. true follower/makes many connections i feel were God led for him to find by spirit in us believers
zackrowe1 10 months ago
Wasn't this on Comedy Central?
jknengr796 11 months ago
Japan weather wars –
Noah = NOAA - National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Japeth = Japan/dropa yellow alien
Shem = sham/trick/fooling of people
Ham = radio wave technology/scalar handlers
They have genocide themselves
cynthiadupuy 11 months ago
I believe the shed blood of Jesus Christ HAD to be sprinkled onto the Mercy Seat as the thousands of sacrificed animals blood that was sprinkled onto the seat forshadowed. I believe what CM has discovered is an ancient relic/copy and the real Ark is in Israel right now, and has always been there... I love CM teachings....thanks
jvsm1971 1 year ago
i love "fingerprints of the holy spirit" talk and also secrets in the torah. letter spacing over whole chapters in bible found in 1800's. not computer codes, holy spirit codes!
zackrowe1 1 year ago
What about the verse in Revelation: 11:19??
onefeather2 1 year ago
@onefeather2 I was thinking the same thing.
Bugil2000 10 months ago
Prophet or not, this fellow is truly an indispensable encyclopedia of knowledge who was chosen to relay some incredible stuff to us. Not many other men that I've seen have the ability to express such a wealth of knowledge with such humor, humility and candor. I pray for his health more than anything else simply because there's not enough time to translate and absorb all the things he has to say. I'm glad he's not shy...
pkmb70 1 year ago 3
holy poop!
pittedthighs 1 year ago
ya chuck proved to me many things.
that otherwise i would have never understood.
newaver64 1 year ago 16
@newaver64 This man thinks that evolution explains the creation of life (it doesn't). He thinks that peanut butter disproves evolution. He thinks that because new life is not created in peanut butter (which does not contain the essential materials for life) that God must have done it. This man is ignorant and so are a majority of his declarations. This man merely fuels conspiracy theories and deliberately misleads and misguides people.
buttface112211 11 months ago
Comment removed
newaver64 11 months ago
@buttface112211 Obviously not since he repeats and recommends that people research for themselves and find their own answers.
DeejaySmitt 11 months ago
if you have followed Missler as long as i have you will find out that he is a modern day prophet
brittneyk007 1 year ago 23
@brittneyk007 yes he is, he is one who is worth hearing all he has to say. those who chuckle over what he has to say, well they will be begging for our help but it will be too late. one day soon its gonna hit the fan and folks will wish they hadn't been blowing off God's word!
indibabs122275 1 year ago
@brittneyk007 he is not a prophet he is a teacher. I don't recall him ever making a prophecy, what he says is common sense and this is what he says about himself
togowack 1 year ago 2
@togowack prophecy isn't just foreknowledge. it is any speaking of the truth of God as led by The Holy Spirit(past present or future). but it doesn't matter if he is a "great" man whatever that is, all that matters is that his message is true, which is why that is the distinguishing characteristic of a prophet. :)
nothin2pruv 1 year ago
@nothin2pruv then all Christians are prophets when they speak the truth yes?
togowack 1 year ago
@togowack Yes. Not to take away from the significance of knowing something beforehand through the power of The Holy Spirit.
nothin2pruv 1 year ago
@nothin2pruv Amen to that. There was one man in the temple who knew he wouldn't die before he held the savior of the world in his hands. These kinds of revelations can keep a guy going.
togowack 1 year ago
Comment removed
IrrepressibleGuile 11 months ago
@brittneyk007 A prophet? This man thinks that evolution explains the creation of life. He thinks that peanut butter disproves evolution. He thinks that because new life is not created in peanut butter (which does not contain the essential materials for life) that God must have done it. If you call him a prophet, so be it, but I will challenge that merely because of the many ignorant remarks this man declares as true. He merely fuels conspiracy theories and attempts to disprove reality.
buttface112211 11 months ago
@buttface112211 "This man thinks that evolution explains the creation of life".... no he doesn't! The problem is that our country is full of Useful Idiots (you may want to look up the term, and see who calls us that) who no longer see the truth in front of their face. If you need to find a secular explanation for this situation, look up a video by Yuri Bezmenov.
joejohnson043 8 months ago
@joejohnson043 /watch?v=FZFG5PKw504 This man is ignorant and promotes conspiracy theories and ignorance to influence others.
buttface112211 8 months ago
@buttface112211 i watched that video, I've seen it before, it's correct. Why would you link it to bolster your case? Everyone knows the discovery of DNA destroyed the Evolutionist's religion. It only survives because our nation is infested with Useful Idiots. Watch Yuri Bezmenov. It's not a 'conspiracy theory', its a conspiracy fact!
joejohnson043 8 months ago
@joejohnson043 Perhaps I shall go over everything that is incorrect in the video. First off, evolution has nothing to do with the beginning of life. It merely explains the gradual change of time that gave us the species we have now. Evolution starts after life is created. Also, we know what chemicals and minerals must be present to create life, such as various forms of amino acids and proteins. Experiments demonstrate that these chemicals can come about through purely natural means.
buttface112211 8 months ago
@buttface112211 now you want to play semantics about evolution? Just like Global warming became Climate Change... who can argue with 'climate change'? That's what the climate does.... marketing/propaganda bs.
DNA is code, mutations destroy code! Why don't you get into your computer's console and start deleting and scrambling your Operating Systems programing, see if it evolves into something.... The only real 'evolution' that occurs is from traits that are already present in the DNA
joejohnson043 8 months ago
@joejohnson043 DNA is not a code, that is just a commonly used analogy do describe the function of DNA. Mutations do not destroy "code", the scramble it and create something new. Most mutations are neutral, some are bad, and some are good. Your computer anology is flawed. Genes can be changed and still function properly, computers unfortunately do not share that characteristic. I assume you watch Kent Hovind often, he says the same garbage, get your facts from legitimate sources.
buttface112211 8 months ago
@buttface112211 I don't know who Kent Hovind is, never heard of him. DNA is a code, you just don't like how it destroys your worldview so you want to rename it. Do you really believe if a herd of cows swim in the tide for 10 million years, they are going to get a blowhole and some fins?
joejohnson043 8 months ago
@joejohnson043 Evolution is a worldview? DNA is not a code, it is an analogy, just the bacteria flagellum is called a motor, it isn't actually a motor, it just has a similar function and similar characteristics. You basically said before that you only accept microevolution and reject macroevolution, despite that fact the macroevolution just occurs over a longer time scale. By the way, whales did not "get" a blowhole and fins. You clearly lack a rudimentary understanding of evolution.
buttface112211 8 months ago
@buttface112211 I know whales didn't 'get' a blowhole, because they were cows or wolves until they decided they 'needed' to evolve a blowhole and fins.... only at that point were they actually a whale....
lets take feathers, didn't that start as a pimple and 20 million years later, that pimple became a feather? Seriously, wake up, and realize you've been deceived by kgb & others(research Yuri Bezmenov) who screwed up our entire nation's ability to utilize common sense....
joejohnson043 8 months ago
@joejohnson043 Whales did not evolve a blowhole. Their nose changed position and function over time. And they did not go from a species of cow to a whale. There are atleast 5 confirmed transitional species that have been found. I watched Yuri Bezmenov. How do you know he is a legitimate source for information? How do you know he is telling the truth? How is this relevant to evolution, and if its only in America, how do you reconcile this with the fact that Europeans accept evolution too?
buttface112211 8 months ago
@buttface112211 regarding Yuri, that video was from 1984, and we see the ramifications of those tactics. The reason I know its legit, is because these are standard tactics any patient adversary would employ, it was put in print by Sun Tzu Thousands of years ago. Our politicians are corrupt and require funding, so they were either short sighted or corrupt enough to not stop it, though at the time of McCarthy some tried didn't they?
joejohnson043 8 months ago
@joejohnson043 How do you equate politicians necessity for funding and the KGB implementing war tactics on Americans so they lose their ability to utilize common sense? I don't see the correlation. Perhaps you should avoid conspiracy theories. Just because a country could do it, does not mean they did do it. You haven't provided varifiable evidence for it, you've merely asserted that we have a corrupt government, and you haven't identified the link between them, elaborate.
buttface112211 8 months ago
@joejohnson043 Peanut butter does not contain any of these crucial elements that are required to make life. No scientist will ever tell you that matter+energy=life. Missler is guilty of mispresentation of facts to support his agenda. This man has no history in biology, perhaps you should be getting your facts from credible sources. Also, the scientific field that deals with the creation of life is called A-biogenesis. Anyone can stand behind a podium and arrange facts into a conspiracy theory.
buttface112211 8 months ago
@brittneyk007 No, he is not, prophets are given info from God directly,from God or through other means that God has specifically told them or sent them. He's just a regular man, claiming to be saved, probably is, who seems to be very smart and well studied in scripture. To say he is a prophet is overboard, and I would consider not even uttering that if your a believer of God.
Shadowlooker12 11 months ago
@Shadowlooker12 before Christ came there was no holy spirit. It only came to the prophets. That exact same spirit lives in those who have Christ. The truth is Jesus and whoever speaks about the truth under the holy spirit and teaches Gods word is a prophet. Jesus is the ultimate truth and revelation, the Old Testament always pointed to him. True prophets speak about the Gospel
JPBuysjr 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JPBuysjr Genesis Ch1 vs 2 last sentence reads as follows " and the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters" end qoute
dlmartin777 11 months ago
@brittneyk007 ~If you have followed Missler for a long time, I would suspect that you have virtually no formal education and are completely unacquaintted with science in any form. Missler is a congenital liar and a scientific illiterate.
pontecanis 8 months ago
Comment removed
MrsClippit 8 months ago
@ pontecanis: if you have followed missler as much as I have, and have the done "your homework", you would realize that he doesn't use scripture to prove script. He shows scripture's super-dimensional origin and trust worthiness first.
tatsumakisempyukaku 1 year ago 2
@ pontecanis: if you have followed missler as much as I have, and have the done "your homework", you would realize that he doesn't use scripture to prove script. He shows scripture's super-dimensional origin and trust worthiness first. Look up dr Gerald schroeder and the science of God as suggested my missler
tatsumakisempyukaku 1 year ago
This should be "Stealing the Mind"...Missler is the master of intrigue, alright. All of this talk can be subsumed under the heading Fallacy of Appeal to Authority: quoting scripture to prove scripture is a fallacy, and always false.
pontecanis 1 year ago
@pontecanis did you just learn that term in your philosophy class? If you are really trying to avoid fallacy, you should reread your last sentence.
joejohnson043 8 months ago
@joejohnson043 ~Quoting scripture to prove scripture is an Appeal to Authority, and is always false. I finished my philosophy classes in 1972, so have had a while to get used to the concept. You might try a course, though. You apparently need one.
pontecanis 8 months ago
@pontecanis it may be a 'fallacy', but it wouldn't be 'always false'?
joejohnson043 8 months ago
@joejohnson043 By definition, a fallcy is always false. if it is not false, it is not a fallacy. It is entirely reasionable to quote scripture to indicate what the scripture SAYS [eg. Genesis is the 1st bookin the bible and it starts: "in the beginning"], but that type of quotation does not claim the bible to be expert on a given topic, merely to indicate contents.
pontecanis 8 months ago
@pontecanis what occult brethren were you inducted ? tell the truth, demon worshipper. be gone by the name of Jesus Christ the LORD
lynzoido 8 months ago
@lynzoido ~You have me confused with my brother Jack. Exorcism doesn't work on me.
pontecanis 8 months ago