@Scyntist This is actually an insult to religious people. Mr. Garrison is a parody of a christian person, who thinks evolution is stupid without having taken the time to study it.
That's how I see it at least. But yeah, I agree. People who gets mad over stuff they see on this show should calm down. ^^
The bible does say God created the animals first and god said be fruitfull and multiply meaning there was already male and females among the animals. Sometimes I think the bible is symbolic not ment litteraly like the dividing of adams ribe to make eve. We tell our children about Santaclaus. God considers us children. We know there's nobody flying in a sled with raindeers but I do believe that there was a Saint Nick at one time. Again maybe a day equils millions of years in the bible.
@bandet888 I'm completely fine with the belief that the bible is symbolic, but my only problem is how that would make it different than a book like Lord of the Rings. I'm not trying to explicitly demean the bible here, I'm just wondering how that issue is resolved to people that take the bible as a metaphor.
I'm not sure god exist or not. I hope he does although the bible doesn't always make him seem fair. The bible says god created man from dirt but who's to say it happened in all one step? perhaps god created life from dirt in the ocean then evolved fish, then apes was evolved then finaly man. If you take out the 24 hour periods in genesis then genesis sounds like possible evolution. God may have created life from dirt then evolved man. Not sure it's true just a thought.
@bandet888 If you read the prophecies of the bible and count all of the historical fullfillments to date (not including the future ones that are yet to be revealed) you will clearly see that no one but God could know the things He predicted through His prophets. Bible prophecy is 100% infallable and history does prove this. Proof that God exists.
@bandet888 For the sake of discussion, if this were true then why would it specifically say that the events took place over 6 days? I think it also specifically says that man was created, then all the animals, then woman. I just think genesis and evolution aren't compatible in any way.
Adaptation is what evolution is all about. Evolution does not imply plants ceasing to photosynthesise. Adaptation is gradual adjustment.
You suggest that collagen adaptation to available sunlight is NOT adaptation? You say these things are "genetic combinations" but not adaptations? So when horses develop different shaped hooves in different terrain, ie their offspring show positive mutation, that isn't adaptation?
Collagen, bone structure, hoof shape. Adaptation. Positive mutation.
i believ in god and evolution, i believe he used evolution as a tool to shape everything since the bible does not specificly explain exactly how god did eveyrthing.
@TheMushugana Thank you! That's exactly how i see. But people tend be black and white about it. They don't consider that evolution could be the answer as to how and not why, as south park put it. Science provides the "how" but as for as the reason and purpose, well that's where your faith and belief come into play
*sigh* now im ranting about this shit again. Nobody should mix science and religion.If there is evolution, its not a proof that god is made-up.If god exists dats also no proof that evolution doesn't exist.Its the same as saying that if, lets say, the PS3 is good then the 360 is bad.I beleive in god...buuut agnosticism FTW :P
I like to think of babies born with an extra finger or a skin condition as proof of evolution. I don't think there's any such thing as an inherently good or bad mutation, how it interacts with the environment defines it as such.
wow are you fucking kidding me...........im here to see comedy and i look down and its a bunch of no life fags arguing weather evolution or god exists....
@forge229 are u 9 yr old or sumthing learn to spell... :l - Weather ? bug? or atleast learn how to use the proper word jesus christ ur moaning about people arguing no-one cares if u dont give a shit. If people argue BIG WOOP its life so live with it, ur the low life fag. :l
@forge229 Wow, are you fucking kidding me? I came here to argue with no life fags and somebody thinks it's comedy! Do weather and god exist? Yes, weather exists. God is a maybe. Fags are of course cigarettes. Give up fags. You'll breathe easier.
@forge229 To be fair, the episode is all about religion. And what did you expect in the comments section for a video about one of the hot button issues in American politics?
@Anacondas101 Makes more sense then to believe in a religion that has only been around for 2,000 years. Humans have been around for 30,000 years. You do the math
@Anacondas101 That is sort of the problem. Religious thought and scientific thought are completely different realms; you can 'choose' to believe in religious ideas, but ideas in science (yes, even theories) are either accepted as fact or proven to be false. 'Accepted' is not to mean guessed as true and then accepted as such; in this case, over 150 years of testing and countless scientific advances all support evolution. If people take time to understand the theory, they will see it's true
OK SO EVERYONE CAN UNDERSTAND NO THEORY OF WHY OR HOW WE ARE HERE CAN BE SUPPORTED THE BING BANG THEORY IS NO BETTER THEN THE CREATIONISM THEORY ITS ALL ABOUT PERSONAL OPINION SO TAKE YOUR HEADS OUT OF YOUR ASSES AND GROW UP U WANNA SUPPRORT SUMTHIN SO BAD DO IT AWAY FROM UR MONITER
@MetalSights You can't have a basic understanding of evolution if you actually believe what you wrote. The video is a joke on the creationists that don't understand the theory and try to explain it like this.
I wouldn't just come on here and spew nonsense I knew nothing about.
A brainless fish somehow rewriting it's DNA to be better over and over and over again over how many 1,000,000,000's of years with absolutely no evidence (Creationism don't have any physical evidence either) confounds me.
We're more closely related to the CHICKEN in DNA than we are to monkeys or any other more sensible human-like animal.
This is my personal opinion, it is not fact, I'm sorry if I've offended you.
@MetalSights There is a massive amount of evidence in support of evolution and absolutely no solid evidence that refutes it, which is why it is still an accepted scientific theory. Science is not about opinions or offending people; it is about facts and the theories supported by facts.
We are actually very close to chimpanzees in DNA. They have 24 chromosome pairs and we have 23 and there is evidence that our 2nd chromosome pair is a fusion of 2 of the chimpanzee pairs.
@rhcp211 You guys believe that there is a common ancestor... One that has never been found and there is ZERO evidence of... You guys say Christians make stuff up... Anyways.. This is a south park video. Stop arguing it makes you all look like idiots.
@saintsrulz So the fact it hasn't been found means that it never will be? If the theory is correct, then the first organism was (by definition) the simplest, most basic organism imaginable; this would imply a soft body and a single cell. As fossilization favors hard body parts (bones), there is an infinitesimally small chance that it would have fossilized. Therefore, any evidence that is found would be circumstantial at best, but that doesn't imply that the ancestor didn't exist.
@rhcp211 Incorrect. Not trying to fight you here, so cool off.
For one, the theory of evolution actually defeats itself.
DNA has been proven to be information, and according to the laws of thermodynamics, information cannot be improved over time without outside influence. Even with technology, the best we can do with information without adding more from external sources is keep it the same. Evolution is information getting better... But where does that info come from?
@BloodSonicFlux It isn't being improved as much as the 'good' pieces of information are being passed on while beings with the 'bad' parts of information die and don't pass that info on. Other than mutations (a valid source of new information) new information isn't being created. One of the assumptions of evolution is that there is diversity in the genes of individuals of a species; this is why new info need not be created.
I'm not trying to fight, either; I like well thought-out discussions.
@rhcp211 But if we all came from ooze, that somehow turned into a protein, which somehow turned into a fish... Where did the blueprints come from? Where was that information created?
Another thing is that mutation doesn't work. DNA is a fourfold self-correcting code. Any mutation is rejected.
Diversity in DNA is physical only. Look at a bunch of humans. Any diverse extras on any of them, ones that are improvements and not deformations? I don't think so. Know why incest is illegal? Genes
@BloodSonicFlux oh bollocks. there's that word "created." blueprints being created. you start out with creation, and that's your formula. creation is an unnecessary hypothesis. DNA mutates constantly, you imagine evolution means "sudden additional appendage" but to evolve is to change gradually. just look at 2 centuries of dog breeding, or trans-continental plant growths, or horses in Africa. DNA is constantly evolving.
@kaitimebb oopsies, you forgot something that defeats your comparison.
Humans breed dogs for specific purposes, giving us these "mutations" in their DNA, all of which are intentional, not accidental.
I don't know of any natural occurence of mutation that leads to an improvement that the entire species then gains, as opposed to the normal occurence of mutations deforming creatures and causing lower quality of life. I don't even know of any beneficial mutations in humans.
@BloodSonicFlux Ah, but you acknowledge mutation 1. takes place and 2. can be beneficial. So let's move on to mutation without specific human directed breeding programmes, as pursued with domestic animals and plants.
When plants move outside their normal range (seeds carried by tides, birds etc) they manifest mutation quite quickly. It's called adaptation. Leaves adapt color, branches adapt structurally etc. The Hawaiian islands provide excellent examples.
@kaitimebb i would think thats not a species but a breed. But flora =/= fauna. Please, enlighten me on a modern-day animal that is a different species. Breeds of dog don't count, because they are still dogs. I ask for examples today, you give me plants.
Difference is that the plants don't change in how they operate. They still absorb sunlight, absorb nutrients from the earth, grow and wither away. if plants were to evolve, they'd do something new. They don't.
@BloodSonicFlux Beneficial mutations in humans are numerous! Paler skin evolved as an adaptation to limited sunlight allows greater absorption of vitamin D at higher latitudes. Reduced collagen in the skin is a reproduceable positive mutation.
The blue eye and blonde hair mutations are cosmetic, and help attract mates.
Other mutations readily observable include skull density, bone structure, and height.
In this day and age, we know enough about DNA to know that any genetic imperfections will be compounded by two people with the same imperfection breeding. This knowledge is also how we breed animals to do what we want them to do the best.
@MalachiCo0 If there were solid evidence against it, it would no longer be an accepted theory. Scientists don't have a hidden agenda to prove evolution true at all costs; I guarantee they'd much rather say 'god did it' whenever they run into any difficulties.
Actually, they do. All the time, if it's in the bible, it's automatically incorrect to them. There is evidence for the flood happening, but scientists reject this because it gets in the way of what they believe in. There is also evidence that humans acually did see dinosaurs, but scientists reject this too, for the same reason.
@MalachiCo0 There is evidence that a big flood happened but it is literally impossible that it was anywhere near what it was described in the bible; it is impossible for a storm to cover the whole world in water and it is even more impossible for all the species to be on one boat. Also, carbon dating puts dinosaurs dying out at about 65 million years ago and the earliest member of genus homo lived about 2.5 million years ago, an order of magnitude away from any chance of them seeing dinosaurs.
@rhcp211 How would you know if it was impossible for a storm to cover the earth? Has anyone tried to simulate it? Plus, who said it was all the species? The bible says KINDS, not species. You can't jump to conclusion and assume kind means the same thing as species. Lets take elephants for example. There are 3 species of elephants, but only 1 elephant kind. There are fifty or so falcons, but only one falcon kind. Plus, if the large animals are not fully grown, the they could fit on the
@MalachiCo0 Rain is water that was evaporated and then falls from the sky. Thus, in order for there to be enough rain to cover the earth, there has to be enough water to cover the earth. There isn't enough water for that to happen therefore there could never be enough rain to cover the earth. It works much the same as conservation of energy in physics (a few slight differences).
@rhcp211 Ark without any problems. Another thing, don't think of the Ark as the little bathroom toy you played with in the tub when you were little: think of it like the Titanic, except without anything for the humans except a small place to sleep. C14 dating is undoubtibly flawed, but scientists still use it for reasons I have no clue for. Plus, the Mokele Mbembe has been spotted by the African peoples who have no knowledge of animals outside of where they live. Some scientists went to
@rhcp211 the jungle one day, and they tested them on what creatures they know. First they show animals native to the area, like elephants, and they recognised every one. They also showed animals not ididgenous to the area, like deer and bear, and they didn't recognise them. Then finally, they showed them a drawing of a sauropod, and they immediatly said "Mokele Mbembe". One more thing about the flood. Most religeons that have ever existed believe in some kind of flood story, which the
@rhcp211 basics are the same. Bilions of people have believed and know this. Something like that had to have happened, something that had so massive of a effect on humanity, that it stayed in lore for thousands of years (maybe, in you nonreligeous types, for millions of years). You are really going to argue with something that has been prevelant in almost all cultures for that amount of time?
@MalachiCo0 I'm done, questioning a basic scientific fact like radioactive decay is where I draw the line. Even if it was highly inaccurate, it wouldn't be so bad as to be orders of magnitude off. I get it, you believe the bible and will shit on science ad nauseum. Your Mokele Mbembe story is no different than people that believe in Bigfoot or the Loch Ness monster.
@rhcp211 Yeah, but unlike the people who saw the Bigfoot and Nessie, the natives who describe them are accually highly reliable. I don't know if you learned this in your history class, but for one to develop a culture, one must be able to be settled. This means farming, and the natives who saw MM are hunter-gatherers. Which means they don't have much of a culture. When you don't have a developed culture, you typically describe what you see. Plus, remember, those guys who saw Bigfoot and
@rhcp211 Nessie are probably educated. The natives who saw MM aren't educated at all. They don't even have knowledge to know what lives on the outside world, besides white men. Just because I believe in what the bible says doesn't mean I deny a whole lot of what scientists say. But seriously dude, when you have almost all the cultures of the world saying there was a flood that covered the earth, there's no possible way that can be a coincidence. Plus I have an idea on that: an ice age.
@rhcp211 An ice age occurs, and then something causes it to thaw quickly into water (maybe a comet, or two, or a lot, more water coming from comets, two!). Then it all drains into a hole that the jews honor as the hole that the flood waters receed into. Where that hole drains to, I have no clue. No body does, but that doesn't mater.
@MetalSights Just like any theory, if anyone found any evidence refuting it then it would not be accepted as a theory anymore. These fish didn't go out and say 'I'm going to evolve into a human.' What happened was some of them evolved certain features that made them more able to survive in certain conditions and they evolved in a direction that would help survive better in their environment. We didn't evolve from fish, we evolved from the same being as fish, just in a different direction.
@rhcp211 Sure. Whatever floats your boat. I haven't seen the massive "evidence" you claim, and I don't buy it. I'm not going to continue arguing about religion. Go ahead and believe whatever you want. I don't care.
@paintballchristian If you mean how the fish came into being, it was evolved from something else. If you want to know where that thing came from, the answer is that evolution doesn't even attempt to answer that because evolution only takes effect after the species comes into being; that is a fight for the big bang theorists.
@paintballchristian Fish came from an earlier life form. At one point, all of life was single-celled organisms covering the planet. It took billions of years and implementations of the "survival of the fittest" theory to evolve those organisms into all of life today, the most advanced being Homo sapiens.
I find it funny that people about the Theory of Evolution and whether it is real or not and if they believe in it... its a fuckin theory guys that means it has been scientifically proven under many conditions to uphold its statement therefore not being a hypothesis as many believe it to be since they don't know what Theory means
@whatyouchating obviously I have the internett, but not the time to look at bullcrap that people make up so they can seem smmarter. I have a couple questions for you. How com fish today show no sign of being a mammal? If there is no God then how were organisms created? how was te universe created? How come some one can be frozen and every organ in is preserved but they still die. Besides if were wrong no big deal right. If you're wrong you get punished or possibly even go to hell.
@tyformer Aaaaaaand we have our new JakeGraceAndGlory, folks, arguments from incredulity and all. This post makes me laugh so hard. You sound like Bill O'Reilly saying we can't explain how tides go in and out. If I'm so stupid as you say, why are you the one that thinks evolution explains how life started? This may be mind-blowing to you, it doesn't. Evolution explains how life CHANGED, not how it began.
Darwin was a 33 degree freemason who was commissioned to write his theory of evolution if anybody want's to know some facts! And 99.8 percent of the scientific community is still learning facts about ancient history that we have known for thousands of years. noobs
@whatyouchating Did you not just listen to what Mr. Garrison said. But seriously though how could a fish all of the sudden breathe air. Even it took miliions of years or whatever. Fish can't breathe air, an undniable fact supported by 100 percent of the scientifiic community. Sometimes the smartest people in the world can also be the dumbest. It's called common scense.
@MrAwesome8617 science and religion dont mix and never will, one spent 500 years in hiding disproving the other one step by step with evidence, you arent doing the world a favor by trying to be a middleman between blind faith and factual science
@mikeyg789 Evolution doesn't require a god, but it doesn't rule one out either. It's no more atheistic than engineering. It's the fact that science and religion don't mix that most scientists still keep their faith, You're not doing the world a favor by trying to be an authority on what we should or should not believe.
@SuaveTito did you even pass 5th grade science? we can watch atoms dissolve and come into existence from nothing for one example, what evidence do you have that life is engineered? there is no good argument for creationism. for you to say that its no more "atheistic" which i assume you mean scientific anymore than "engineering" which describes creationism which is a man-made idea like religion itself, is quite frankly stupid.
@mikeyg789 I'm a sophomore in college for mechanical engineering, so yeah I did pass 5th grade science. I don't have any evidence for creationism. I don't believe it either. What I mean by being no more atheistic than engineering is what you said yourself. The fact that science and religion don't mix means they have little to no weight on each other. A lot of Christians accept scientific theory. I have my beliefs, you have yours. I don't push mine on others, so neither should you.
@MrAwesome8617 why believe in christianity if you arent following every dogma it has? if not yes you are a hypocrite, just leave that shit behind and be a good person based on being a good person not that some fake being gives you morals when its been shown that the morals more less come environmentally from childhood
@mikeyg789 look, i believe in wat i believe in so no retard from the internet is going to change that. ps do you really think a 12 year old would understand wat u said in ur last comment
@mikeyg789 "Why believe in Christianity if you aren't following every dogma it has?" Religion doesn't require that we believe everything it tells us. That's how it's different from a CULT. Religion encourages free thought. I find it funny that you're being so black and white on the issue in that you say either we follow everything or follow nothing, and see no middle ground, where most of the non-bigot Christians lie.
@MoustacheMyMoustache do u really think some random retard on the internet is going to cahnge anything about me?? if you do you should get of the computer and destroy it with a sledge hammer
Wow guys its South Park, your not gonna convert anyone one way or the other on youtube comments much less on a south park video. Now if you will excuse me I got to go find the missing link between retarded squirrel frog and monkey
wow guys. it's a south park video. no one gives a shit how much you know about something that's not even true. but congratulations on being dumbasses with no sense of humor(:
@whatyouchating Technically there are facts in science. They're called laws or principles, and the only real difference is that they can be represented with numbers. Newton's Laws of Motion: it's a fact that if I push a box, the box pushes me. Other than that, Conservation Laws, Laws of Thermodynamics, Ohm's Law, Kirchoff's Voltage and Current Laws, just to name a few.
So now we know where LIBERALS came from. BAAA HA HA!
LarryHarveyMusic 1 day ago
So there ya go, your the offspring of 5 retarded monkeys having butt sex with a fish squirrel, congratulations....god I love south park
utboy92 2 days ago
Laughing at evolution lol
chazzybadazz 4 days ago
South Park for the win. Picture perfect representation of evolution.
XGod0 1 week ago
I AM SO OFFENDED BY THIS VIDEO... so i am going to report this liar of a video to GOOOOOOOOOOODDDDDDDD!
BabyBopsDock91 2 weeks ago
NARWHAL NARWHALS SWIMMIN IN THE OCEAN CAUSIN A COMMOTION CUASE THEY ARE SO AWESOME
IAmAPeanut96 3 weeks ago
laughing at creationist HA
TheDrewManXD 1 month ago
So we are the retarded offspring of a fish having buttsex?
Shizuchanable 1 month ago
This still sounds more plausible than creationism. I'll wait five minutes for all the haters to flood my inbox.
bushbasher85 1 month ago 2
I think this is more easy to believe than reading the Bible :D
phreshboii1000 1 month ago 2
SO TRUE this explains everything:)
sethblatt 1 month ago
This is horribly funny.
KnightOneDark 1 month ago
This is fucking hilarious! xD
Uzerc 1 month ago
To all those who support evolution and find this insulting: LIGHTEN THE FUCK UP!
It's a joke--laugh a little. These cartoonists make fun of everything.
I support evolution, but I still find this funny.
Scyntist 1 month ago 4
@Scyntist ITS SOUTH PARK! IF IT OFFENDS THEN THE CREATORS WERE SUCCESSFUL!
TheDrewManXD 1 month ago
@Scyntist This is actually an insult to religious people. Mr. Garrison is a parody of a christian person, who thinks evolution is stupid without having taken the time to study it.
That's how I see it at least. But yeah, I agree. People who gets mad over stuff they see on this show should calm down. ^^
felixkjoller 1 month ago
butt sex XD
scania235 2 months ago
I was crying with laughter lolol
Pirhannaboy2 2 months ago
that sounds about right
lucariogirl124 2 months ago
what episode is this?
w12joaocamba 2 months ago
@w12joaocamba The episode has about 2 or 3 parts and is called "Go God Go"
CaptainArrrgh 1 month ago
@w12joaocamba go god go
wfcsports 1 month ago
ahahahahahahahhahahaahhahaahhaha i nearly died laughing
infinitytru 2 months ago
i agree with mr.garrison
kyuubisharinan3296 2 months ago
sense of humor guys, please & fookin' enjoy, those 2 dudes from SP ARE 220% godFREE!
JUGAopet1 2 months ago
Aw man I knew as soon as I would look at the comments for this video there would be a huge debate about it :/
JanitorPride2 2 months ago
Hey guys, let's have a big debate on the video of a cartoon.
crsini520 2 months ago 38
@crsini520 oh god i fucking hate peole who empathize so much with what they see in a video and take things so seriously
BLACKHATencrypted 1 month ago
The bible does say God created the animals first and god said be fruitfull and multiply meaning there was already male and females among the animals. Sometimes I think the bible is symbolic not ment litteraly like the dividing of adams ribe to make eve. We tell our children about Santaclaus. God considers us children. We know there's nobody flying in a sled with raindeers but I do believe that there was a Saint Nick at one time. Again maybe a day equils millions of years in the bible.
bandet888 2 months ago
@bandet888 I'm completely fine with the belief that the bible is symbolic, but my only problem is how that would make it different than a book like Lord of the Rings. I'm not trying to explicitly demean the bible here, I'm just wondering how that issue is resolved to people that take the bible as a metaphor.
rhcp211 2 months ago
I'm not sure god exist or not. I hope he does although the bible doesn't always make him seem fair. The bible says god created man from dirt but who's to say it happened in all one step? perhaps god created life from dirt in the ocean then evolved fish, then apes was evolved then finaly man. If you take out the 24 hour periods in genesis then genesis sounds like possible evolution. God may have created life from dirt then evolved man. Not sure it's true just a thought.
bandet888 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@bandet888 If you read the prophecies of the bible and count all of the historical fullfillments to date (not including the future ones that are yet to be revealed) you will clearly see that no one but God could know the things He predicted through His prophets. Bible prophecy is 100% infallable and history does prove this. Proof that God exists.
hifiguy9 3 months ago
@bandet888 For the sake of discussion, if this were true then why would it specifically say that the events took place over 6 days? I think it also specifically says that man was created, then all the animals, then woman. I just think genesis and evolution aren't compatible in any way.
rhcp211 3 months ago
@rhcp211 Read my other comment I posted. It was ment to be replayed to you.
bandet888 2 months ago
@rhcp211 Please read my other comment I just posted. It was ment to be a reply to you
bandet888 2 months ago
@rhcp211 It's a fairy tale. It isn't supposed to make sense.
theknightswhosayfrak 2 months ago
Adaptation is what evolution is all about. Evolution does not imply plants ceasing to photosynthesise. Adaptation is gradual adjustment.
You suggest that collagen adaptation to available sunlight is NOT adaptation? You say these things are "genetic combinations" but not adaptations? So when horses develop different shaped hooves in different terrain, ie their offspring show positive mutation, that isn't adaptation?
Collagen, bone structure, hoof shape. Adaptation. Positive mutation.
kaitimebb 3 months ago
this made me lol so hard
TotalShippudenIsland 3 months ago
Haha great episode!
GamefreakTP 3 months ago
God made Adam & Eve; they had sex, and here we are. Oh, the first person to walk the Earth after they had sex was obviously Chuck Norris. :)
erpuzzetta01 3 months ago
Theres no such thing as evolution, jews created it to cover up for all the sins they commited( the holocaust is a lie!)
Shibbidge111 3 months ago
@Shibbidge111 You are retarded.
Josexylo9 3 months ago
@Josexylo9 He's a troll.
dragonfan1981 3 months ago
@Shibbidge111 Trolol
Zachdudeio2 3 months ago
@Shibbidge111 retard fish.
titteringfiend1 3 months ago
@Shibbidge111 I think this was a joke and i like south park : )
Shibbidge111 2 months ago 3
Mr. Garrison is my fave teacher.
901Cathy 3 months ago
Evolution is a bunch of BULL-CRAP!!!
skipcharlie 3 months ago in playlist Cartman
i believ in god and evolution, i believe he used evolution as a tool to shape everything since the bible does not specificly explain exactly how god did eveyrthing.
TheMushugana 4 months ago
@TheMushugana Thank you! That's exactly how i see. But people tend be black and white about it. They don't consider that evolution could be the answer as to how and not why, as south park put it. Science provides the "how" but as for as the reason and purpose, well that's where your faith and belief come into play
Ulitmadusk 3 months ago
PLEASE ban comments!!!!
rockstorm96 4 months ago
I don't think he enjoys charles darwin.
this will totally be top comment because its not dealing with evolution or god.
MultiSdgsg 4 months ago
@lotmein20 I wouldn't mind mutating a second pair of genitals so I can have two women at the same time.
Standuble 4 months ago
*sigh* now im ranting about this shit again. Nobody should mix science and religion.If there is evolution, its not a proof that god is made-up.If god exists dats also no proof that evolution doesn't exist.Its the same as saying that if, lets say, the PS3 is good then the 360 is bad.I beleive in god...buuut agnosticism FTW :P
Jtiger987 4 months ago
@Jtiger987 wait wait wait, did you just insult the ps3?
no no, don't get in to this, nono, whatever you do DO NOT reply to this comment.
not another 4 day agruement over youtube.
MultiSdgsg 4 months ago
@MultiSdgsg He didn't say the PS3 was bad, lol
re read it
bearandwoot 4 months ago
@MultiSdgsg :D sorry, no argument.Nope, the PS3 is awesome.I was just imlying it as a possible subject :)
Jtiger987 4 months ago
@Jtiger987 OH THANK JESUS! i have gone through arguements like that over youtube before, god dammit its not fun!
MultiSdgsg 4 months ago
Swag.
pboeckx 4 months ago
I love south park
Shrubbery88 4 months ago 8
funny how some people turn funny things into racism or arguin lol..
cuzzigothigh 4 months ago
I like to think of babies born with an extra finger or a skin condition as proof of evolution. I don't think there's any such thing as an inherently good or bad mutation, how it interacts with the environment defines it as such.
Standuble 4 months ago
wow are you fucking kidding me...........im here to see comedy and i look down and its a bunch of no life fags arguing weather evolution or god exists....
bug fricking suprise!
forge229 4 months ago 63
@forge229
bug fricking suprise, lol
big fucking surprise
AperSci3 4 months ago
@forge229 are u 9 yr old or sumthing learn to spell... :l - Weather ? bug? or atleast learn how to use the proper word jesus christ ur moaning about people arguing no-one cares if u dont give a shit. If people argue BIG WOOP its life so live with it, ur the low life fag. :l
MrTeabag13 3 months ago
@MrTeabag13 typo dick face i don't read over my comments you stupid cunt, besides you know whart ei ment aney way.
forge229 3 months ago
@forge229 yeah ikr
cdemaster1 3 months ago
@forge229 Wow, are you fucking kidding me? I came here to argue with no life fags and somebody thinks it's comedy! Do weather and god exist? Yes, weather exists. God is a maybe. Fags are of course cigarettes. Give up fags. You'll breathe easier.
kaitimebb 3 months ago
@forge229 To be fair, the episode is all about religion. And what did you expect in the comments section for a video about one of the hot button issues in American politics?
rhcp211 3 months ago
MATHS!
AzThe021 4 months ago
@JakeGraceAndGlory I HAVE SEEN THE LIGHT!!! GOD SPOKE TO ME LAST NIGHT IN MY DREAM! HE TOLD ME YOUR FAT
IamSpykiller19 4 months ago
...alright then, you just continue on believing that whole conspiracy. I'm sure some poor fools bound to believe that.
MadaraXIII 4 months ago
i'm Catholic not sure if i belive in Evolution or not but Evolution makes enough sense for me to belive.
Anacondas101 4 months ago
@Anacondas101 Makes more sense then to believe in a religion that has only been around for 2,000 years. Humans have been around for 30,000 years. You do the math
tdyyy1613 4 months ago
@Anacondas101 That is sort of the problem. Religious thought and scientific thought are completely different realms; you can 'choose' to believe in religious ideas, but ideas in science (yes, even theories) are either accepted as fact or proven to be false. 'Accepted' is not to mean guessed as true and then accepted as such; in this case, over 150 years of testing and countless scientific advances all support evolution. If people take time to understand the theory, they will see it's true
rhcp211 4 months ago
OK SO EVERYONE CAN UNDERSTAND NO THEORY OF WHY OR HOW WE ARE HERE CAN BE SUPPORTED THE BING BANG THEORY IS NO BETTER THEN THE CREATIONISM THEORY ITS ALL ABOUT PERSONAL OPINION SO TAKE YOUR HEADS OUT OF YOUR ASSES AND GROW UP U WANNA SUPPRORT SUMTHIN SO BAD DO IT AWAY FROM UR MONITER
RAZZ1496 4 months ago
Jesus H. CHRIST!!! Stop arguing with each other and enjoy the video for what it is: friggin' COMEDY!!
blondmop92 4 months ago
Lol it makes about as much sense as evolution.
MetalSights 4 months ago
@MetalSights You can't have a basic understanding of evolution if you actually believe what you wrote. The video is a joke on the creationists that don't understand the theory and try to explain it like this.
rhcp211 4 months ago
@rhcp211
I wouldn't just come on here and spew nonsense I knew nothing about.
A brainless fish somehow rewriting it's DNA to be better over and over and over again over how many 1,000,000,000's of years with absolutely no evidence (Creationism don't have any physical evidence either) confounds me.
We're more closely related to the CHICKEN in DNA than we are to monkeys or any other more sensible human-like animal.
This is my personal opinion, it is not fact, I'm sorry if I've offended you.
MetalSights 4 months ago
@MetalSights There is a massive amount of evidence in support of evolution and absolutely no solid evidence that refutes it, which is why it is still an accepted scientific theory. Science is not about opinions or offending people; it is about facts and the theories supported by facts.
We are actually very close to chimpanzees in DNA. They have 24 chromosome pairs and we have 23 and there is evidence that our 2nd chromosome pair is a fusion of 2 of the chimpanzee pairs.
rhcp211 4 months ago 17
@rhcp211 You guys believe that there is a common ancestor... One that has never been found and there is ZERO evidence of... You guys say Christians make stuff up... Anyways.. This is a south park video. Stop arguing it makes you all look like idiots.
saintsrulz 3 months ago in playlist Cartman
@saintsrulz So the fact it hasn't been found means that it never will be? If the theory is correct, then the first organism was (by definition) the simplest, most basic organism imaginable; this would imply a soft body and a single cell. As fossilization favors hard body parts (bones), there is an infinitesimally small chance that it would have fossilized. Therefore, any evidence that is found would be circumstantial at best, but that doesn't imply that the ancestor didn't exist.
rhcp211 3 months ago
@rhcp211
Don't get me wrong, but I don't think CHIMPANSEEZ can talk or think,
So you go and run around playing a monkey bro.
brief555 3 months ago
@rhcp211 Who gives a shit? Quit arguing and watch the fucking video.
MAriNeMandM 3 months ago
@rhcp211 LOL
I'm a christian and i'm in between young and old earth theory. I have reasons to be a christian and reasons to NOT be an atheist.
kidasterorig111 3 months ago
@kidasterorig111 Does that mean you're a Middle-earth creationist? ^_^
TheBiAtheist 3 months ago 14
@TheBiAtheist LOL
That was funny
kidasterorig111 3 months ago
@kidasterorig111 I thought it was too. :)
TheBiAtheist 3 months ago
@TheBiAtheist LOL
kidasterorig111 3 months ago
@rhcp211 Incorrect. Not trying to fight you here, so cool off.
For one, the theory of evolution actually defeats itself.
DNA has been proven to be information, and according to the laws of thermodynamics, information cannot be improved over time without outside influence. Even with technology, the best we can do with information without adding more from external sources is keep it the same. Evolution is information getting better... But where does that info come from?
BloodSonicFlux 3 months ago
@BloodSonicFlux It isn't being improved as much as the 'good' pieces of information are being passed on while beings with the 'bad' parts of information die and don't pass that info on. Other than mutations (a valid source of new information) new information isn't being created. One of the assumptions of evolution is that there is diversity in the genes of individuals of a species; this is why new info need not be created.
I'm not trying to fight, either; I like well thought-out discussions.
rhcp211 3 months ago
@rhcp211 But if we all came from ooze, that somehow turned into a protein, which somehow turned into a fish... Where did the blueprints come from? Where was that information created?
Another thing is that mutation doesn't work. DNA is a fourfold self-correcting code. Any mutation is rejected.
Diversity in DNA is physical only. Look at a bunch of humans. Any diverse extras on any of them, ones that are improvements and not deformations? I don't think so. Know why incest is illegal? Genes
BloodSonicFlux 3 months ago
@BloodSonicFlux oh bollocks. there's that word "created." blueprints being created. you start out with creation, and that's your formula. creation is an unnecessary hypothesis. DNA mutates constantly, you imagine evolution means "sudden additional appendage" but to evolve is to change gradually. just look at 2 centuries of dog breeding, or trans-continental plant growths, or horses in Africa. DNA is constantly evolving.
Nothing is created. Everything has antecedents.
kaitimebb 3 months ago
@kaitimebb oopsies, you forgot something that defeats your comparison.
Humans breed dogs for specific purposes, giving us these "mutations" in their DNA, all of which are intentional, not accidental.
I don't know of any natural occurence of mutation that leads to an improvement that the entire species then gains, as opposed to the normal occurence of mutations deforming creatures and causing lower quality of life. I don't even know of any beneficial mutations in humans.
BloodSonicFlux 3 months ago
@BloodSonicFlux Ah, but you acknowledge mutation 1. takes place and 2. can be beneficial. So let's move on to mutation without specific human directed breeding programmes, as pursued with domestic animals and plants.
When plants move outside their normal range (seeds carried by tides, birds etc) they manifest mutation quite quickly. It's called adaptation. Leaves adapt color, branches adapt structurally etc. The Hawaiian islands provide excellent examples.
OVER TIME new species result.
kaitimebb 3 months ago
@kaitimebb i would think thats not a species but a breed. But flora =/= fauna. Please, enlighten me on a modern-day animal that is a different species. Breeds of dog don't count, because they are still dogs. I ask for examples today, you give me plants.
Difference is that the plants don't change in how they operate. They still absorb sunlight, absorb nutrients from the earth, grow and wither away. if plants were to evolve, they'd do something new. They don't.
BloodSonicFlux 3 months ago
@kaitimebb Oh, and lest I forget, you seem to have misunderstood. I was asking for an example of a beneficial mutation. I know of none.
BloodSonicFlux 3 months ago
@BloodSonicFlux Beneficial mutations in humans are numerous! Paler skin evolved as an adaptation to limited sunlight allows greater absorption of vitamin D at higher latitudes. Reduced collagen in the skin is a reproduceable positive mutation.
The blue eye and blonde hair mutations are cosmetic, and help attract mates.
Other mutations readily observable include skull density, bone structure, and height.
kaitimebb 3 months ago
@kaitimebb But they are still humans. What you are referring to is genetic combinations, not adaptations.
BloodSonicFlux 3 months ago
@rhcp211 (part 2 XD)
In this day and age, we know enough about DNA to know that any genetic imperfections will be compounded by two people with the same imperfection breeding. This knowledge is also how we breed animals to do what we want them to do the best.
BloodSonicFlux 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BloodSonicFlux By the God!Are you happy now?
AnimusPipboy 3 months ago
@rhcp211 Nooooooooooooo.
That is not true. There is accually much more evidence proving against evolution than supporting it.
MalachiCo0 3 months ago
@MalachiCo0 If there were solid evidence against it, it would no longer be an accepted theory. Scientists don't have a hidden agenda to prove evolution true at all costs; I guarantee they'd much rather say 'god did it' whenever they run into any difficulties.
rhcp211 3 months ago
@rhcp211
Actually, they do. All the time, if it's in the bible, it's automatically incorrect to them. There is evidence for the flood happening, but scientists reject this because it gets in the way of what they believe in. There is also evidence that humans acually did see dinosaurs, but scientists reject this too, for the same reason.
MalachiCo0 2 months ago
@MalachiCo0 There is evidence that a big flood happened but it is literally impossible that it was anywhere near what it was described in the bible; it is impossible for a storm to cover the whole world in water and it is even more impossible for all the species to be on one boat. Also, carbon dating puts dinosaurs dying out at about 65 million years ago and the earliest member of genus homo lived about 2.5 million years ago, an order of magnitude away from any chance of them seeing dinosaurs.
rhcp211 2 months ago
@rhcp211 How would you know if it was impossible for a storm to cover the earth? Has anyone tried to simulate it? Plus, who said it was all the species? The bible says KINDS, not species. You can't jump to conclusion and assume kind means the same thing as species. Lets take elephants for example. There are 3 species of elephants, but only 1 elephant kind. There are fifty or so falcons, but only one falcon kind. Plus, if the large animals are not fully grown, the they could fit on the
MalachiCo0 2 months ago
@MalachiCo0 Rain is water that was evaporated and then falls from the sky. Thus, in order for there to be enough rain to cover the earth, there has to be enough water to cover the earth. There isn't enough water for that to happen therefore there could never be enough rain to cover the earth. It works much the same as conservation of energy in physics (a few slight differences).
rhcp211 2 months ago
@rhcp211 Ark without any problems. Another thing, don't think of the Ark as the little bathroom toy you played with in the tub when you were little: think of it like the Titanic, except without anything for the humans except a small place to sleep. C14 dating is undoubtibly flawed, but scientists still use it for reasons I have no clue for. Plus, the Mokele Mbembe has been spotted by the African peoples who have no knowledge of animals outside of where they live. Some scientists went to
MalachiCo0 2 months ago
@rhcp211 the jungle one day, and they tested them on what creatures they know. First they show animals native to the area, like elephants, and they recognised every one. They also showed animals not ididgenous to the area, like deer and bear, and they didn't recognise them. Then finally, they showed them a drawing of a sauropod, and they immediatly said "Mokele Mbembe". One more thing about the flood. Most religeons that have ever existed believe in some kind of flood story, which the
MalachiCo0 2 months ago
@rhcp211 basics are the same. Bilions of people have believed and know this. Something like that had to have happened, something that had so massive of a effect on humanity, that it stayed in lore for thousands of years (maybe, in you nonreligeous types, for millions of years). You are really going to argue with something that has been prevelant in almost all cultures for that amount of time?
MalachiCo0 2 months ago
@MalachiCo0 I'm done, questioning a basic scientific fact like radioactive decay is where I draw the line. Even if it was highly inaccurate, it wouldn't be so bad as to be orders of magnitude off. I get it, you believe the bible and will shit on science ad nauseum. Your Mokele Mbembe story is no different than people that believe in Bigfoot or the Loch Ness monster.
rhcp211 2 months ago
@rhcp211 Yeah, but unlike the people who saw the Bigfoot and Nessie, the natives who describe them are accually highly reliable. I don't know if you learned this in your history class, but for one to develop a culture, one must be able to be settled. This means farming, and the natives who saw MM are hunter-gatherers. Which means they don't have much of a culture. When you don't have a developed culture, you typically describe what you see. Plus, remember, those guys who saw Bigfoot and
MalachiCo0 2 months ago
@rhcp211 Nessie are probably educated. The natives who saw MM aren't educated at all. They don't even have knowledge to know what lives on the outside world, besides white men. Just because I believe in what the bible says doesn't mean I deny a whole lot of what scientists say. But seriously dude, when you have almost all the cultures of the world saying there was a flood that covered the earth, there's no possible way that can be a coincidence. Plus I have an idea on that: an ice age.
MalachiCo0 2 months ago
@rhcp211 An ice age occurs, and then something causes it to thaw quickly into water (maybe a comet, or two, or a lot, more water coming from comets, two!). Then it all drains into a hole that the jews honor as the hole that the flood waters receed into. Where that hole drains to, I have no clue. No body does, but that doesn't mater.
MalachiCo0 2 months ago
@MetalSights Just like any theory, if anyone found any evidence refuting it then it would not be accepted as a theory anymore. These fish didn't go out and say 'I'm going to evolve into a human.' What happened was some of them evolved certain features that made them more able to survive in certain conditions and they evolved in a direction that would help survive better in their environment. We didn't evolve from fish, we evolved from the same being as fish, just in a different direction.
rhcp211 4 months ago
@rhcp211 Sure. Whatever floats your boat. I haven't seen the massive "evidence" you claim, and I don't buy it. I'm not going to continue arguing about religion. Go ahead and believe whatever you want. I don't care.
MetalSights 4 months ago
@rhcp211 lol where did the fish come from?
paintballchristian 4 months ago
@paintballchristian If you mean how the fish came into being, it was evolved from something else. If you want to know where that thing came from, the answer is that evolution doesn't even attempt to answer that because evolution only takes effect after the species comes into being; that is a fight for the big bang theorists.
rhcp211 4 months ago
@paintballchristian Fish came from an earlier life form. At one point, all of life was single-celled organisms covering the planet. It took billions of years and implementations of the "survival of the fittest" theory to evolve those organisms into all of life today, the most advanced being Homo sapiens.
crzysteve159 4 months ago
still makes more sense than the whole god garbage
ARavingLooony 4 months ago
Great video - hilarious!!!
darkallegiance666 4 months ago
I find it funny that people about the Theory of Evolution and whether it is real or not and if they believe in it... its a fuckin theory guys that means it has been scientifically proven under many conditions to uphold its statement therefore not being a hypothesis as many believe it to be since they don't know what Theory means
LSUFanz85 4 months ago
I didnt read all the comments but how did u switch from evolution to the holocaust?
nittwins123 4 months ago
How we evolved from a single cell to male and female ? Evolution is fake
MrCobra811 4 months ago
How about everybody shut the fuck up and just listen to the clip you idiots lol
MisterGermonotta 4 months ago
The best explanation for evolution ever!!!!
dex1391 4 months ago
@whatyouchating obviously I have the internett, but not the time to look at bullcrap that people make up so they can seem smmarter. I have a couple questions for you. How com fish today show no sign of being a mammal? If there is no God then how were organisms created? how was te universe created? How come some one can be frozen and every organ in is preserved but they still die. Besides if were wrong no big deal right. If you're wrong you get punished or possibly even go to hell.
tyformer 4 months ago
@tyformer Aaaaaaand we have our new JakeGraceAndGlory, folks, arguments from incredulity and all. This post makes me laugh so hard. You sound like Bill O'Reilly saying we can't explain how tides go in and out. If I'm so stupid as you say, why are you the one that thinks evolution explains how life started? This may be mind-blowing to you, it doesn't. Evolution explains how life CHANGED, not how it began.
SuaveTito 4 months ago
Darwin was a 33 degree freemason who was commissioned to write his theory of evolution if anybody want's to know some facts! And 99.8 percent of the scientific community is still learning facts about ancient history that we have known for thousands of years. noobs
victherattlehead77 4 months ago
what episode plzz tell
24obito24 4 months ago
@24obito24 "Go God Go!"
SuaveTito 4 months ago
@23coisinho great comment
MrKGatl 4 months ago
@whatyouchating Did you not just listen to what Mr. Garrison said. But seriously though how could a fish all of the sudden breathe air. Even it took miliions of years or whatever. Fish can't breathe air, an undniable fact supported by 100 percent of the scientifiic community. Sometimes the smartest people in the world can also be the dumbest. It's called common scense.
tyformer 4 months ago
@tyformer "Fish can't breathe air, an undeniable fact supported by 100 percent of the scientific community"
You've clearly never heard of the lungfish, have you?
SuaveTito 4 months ago
@SuaveTito Dude, your retarded go find another 13 year old to act smart around, you stupid athiest
tyformer 4 months ago
@tyformer Actually I'm neither mentally handicapped nor atheist, so how about an actually intelligent response instead of spewing childish insults?
SuaveTito 4 months ago
seriously? arguments over a south park video about eveloution? im a christan but i still believe in evolution
MrAwesome8617 4 months ago 11
@MrAwesome8617 then youre a hypocrite, leave the dogma behind
mikeyg789 4 months ago
@mikeyg789 how am i a hyporcrite?
MrAwesome8617 4 months ago
@MrAwesome8617 science and religion dont mix and never will, one spent 500 years in hiding disproving the other one step by step with evidence, you arent doing the world a favor by trying to be a middleman between blind faith and factual science
mikeyg789 4 months ago
@mikeyg789 well just because it dodnt mix well in the past y the fudgcicles do i need to be like that :/
MrAwesome8617 4 months ago
@mikeyg789 Evolution doesn't require a god, but it doesn't rule one out either. It's no more atheistic than engineering. It's the fact that science and religion don't mix that most scientists still keep their faith, You're not doing the world a favor by trying to be an authority on what we should or should not believe.
SuaveTito 4 months ago
@SuaveTito did you even pass 5th grade science? we can watch atoms dissolve and come into existence from nothing for one example, what evidence do you have that life is engineered? there is no good argument for creationism. for you to say that its no more "atheistic" which i assume you mean scientific anymore than "engineering" which describes creationism which is a man-made idea like religion itself, is quite frankly stupid.
mikeyg789 4 months ago
@mikeyg789 I'm a sophomore in college for mechanical engineering, so yeah I did pass 5th grade science. I don't have any evidence for creationism. I don't believe it either. What I mean by being no more atheistic than engineering is what you said yourself. The fact that science and religion don't mix means they have little to no weight on each other. A lot of Christians accept scientific theory. I have my beliefs, you have yours. I don't push mine on others, so neither should you.
SuaveTito 4 months ago
@mikeyg789 i dont really care. i also believen gay marrige. i guese that makes me a hypocrite for believing fair treatment
MrAwesome8617 4 months ago
@MrAwesome8617 why believe in christianity if you arent following every dogma it has? if not yes you are a hypocrite, just leave that shit behind and be a good person based on being a good person not that some fake being gives you morals when its been shown that the morals more less come environmentally from childhood
mikeyg789 4 months ago
@mikeyg789 im 12 fucktard
MrAwesome8617 4 months ago
@MrAwesome8617 so because you're 12 you're immune to logic? i should lie to you and tell you a flying spaghetti monster is judging you?
mikeyg789 4 months ago
@mikeyg789 look, i believe in wat i believe in so no retard from the internet is going to change that. ps do you really think a 12 year old would understand wat u said in ur last comment
MrAwesome8617 4 months ago
@MrAwesome8617 apparently not because you didnt understand anything i said earleri either
mikeyg789 4 months ago
@mikeyg789 just shut up and stop rapeing my inbox
MrAwesome8617 4 months ago
@MrAwesome8617 If God really did create all life, do you seriously believe you'd be the way you are? xD
paddygilbert 4 months ago
@paddygilbert i dont believe in EVERYTHING in the bible.im not responding anymore
MrAwesome8617 4 months ago
@mikeyg789 "Why believe in Christianity if you aren't following every dogma it has?" Religion doesn't require that we believe everything it tells us. That's how it's different from a CULT. Religion encourages free thought. I find it funny that you're being so black and white on the issue in that you say either we follow everything or follow nothing, and see no middle ground, where most of the non-bigot Christians lie.
SuaveTito 4 months ago
@MrAwesome8617 That's fucking retarded.
MoustacheMyMoustache 4 months ago
@MoustacheMyMoustache who started talking about your grandma???
MrAwesome8617 4 months ago
@MrAwesome8617 Dude you're fucking retarded.
MoustacheMyMoustache 4 months ago
@MoustacheMyMoustache do u really think some random retard on the internet is going to cahnge anything about me?? if you do you should get of the computer and destroy it with a sledge hammer
MrAwesome8617 4 months ago
First time I heard this,
I seriously couldn't breathe for awhile XD
97Karnage 5 months ago
haha this video is sooo funny and so true to the way these guys think i will watch it over and over HAHAHA!
talons2112 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
That does not make sense!!
a3as 5 months ago
Wow guys its South Park, your not gonna convert anyone one way or the other on youtube comments much less on a south park video. Now if you will excuse me I got to go find the missing link between retarded squirrel frog and monkey
cdemaster1 5 months ago
Evolution is a bunch of bullshit sounds as retarded as a god created everything
kookieless 5 months ago
@kookieless if you believe neither, you surpass retardation.
missionpupa 5 months ago
@missionpupa we all know i am the only one existing everyone else is an illusion :p
kookieless 5 months ago
wow guys. it's a south park video. no one gives a shit how much you know about something that's not even true. but congratulations on being dumbasses with no sense of humor(:
ninjagray218 5 months ago
@whatyouchating Technically there are facts in science. They're called laws or principles, and the only real difference is that they can be represented with numbers. Newton's Laws of Motion: it's a fact that if I push a box, the box pushes me. Other than that, Conservation Laws, Laws of Thermodynamics, Ohm's Law, Kirchoff's Voltage and Current Laws, just to name a few.
SuaveTito 5 months ago