he died of cancer.. he was building the machine too cure himself and others with cancer! especially for youth who had cancer!. he would often see them after getting kemotherapy. and the tolls it took on there small boddies... he was a awsome man!! are hole city morned when he passed....
he died from what he was trying too cure! unfortunately........there still testing his machine soon human trial will begin...... he was a awsome inventor!! in my home town here
so, he died in 2009. really? he probably came up across one of the most important discoveries of this time and he just happen to die? hmmm doesnt sound suspecious to you? aww it really makes me sad to realize that this world has become soo adicted to oil and profit that they forget esential human principles. search for John_Kanzius on wikipedia
...and then the banker controlled government buys his patent, gives him a mansion, great healthcare, and lots of other goodies and the project is now suppressed. This is what's fucked up about our society, but other countries can build this stuff, and 300+ mph bullet trains, etc... but not us, too many fricking regulations. please visit INFOWARS.COM to change this and allow WE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE to use this technology.
Hope you make it--everyone else who has found the answer to those two things has been shot down (some literally), threatened, or demoted. But get this info out--people want it. Eventually the greedmongers will be overthrown by the masses of revolutionary people.
Well.. Once the power exceeds the requirements of the giant radiowave machine, the saltwater powerplant would not consume power from the power grid, but charge power INTO it. You see... ALL powerplants need some power to go online.
The thing is: How efficient do they produce power?
@evilsandwich2 This video is completely missing the point. I don't understand how something SO PLAINLY OBVIOUS can be missed by a whole institution + a news channel. Turn off the RF generator and the flame will stop.
Not only that RF generators are NOT efficient. The heat produced by that flame will also be less than the electricity used to make the RF in the first place.
Also put that flame in a car engine and it will do nothing, not even slightly enough power to run an engine on.
holy crap @ 13 years old im understanding benwith1n and masotta's "chat" lol...now i just need both to example it to me and i would 100% understand and copy probably. :)
See it this way; I have water in my tank and with a terribly efficient electrolysis system I separate it into O2 & H2 then I send this mix to the cylinders then a spark and I receive energy, the product of the detonation is WATER that goes to the exhaust system, but I'm a very clever American then I routed my exhaust to my Gas tank then the Water level is always constant!!! and I invented the perpetual movement.... Please.... this is JUNK
2 molecules of water are converted into 2 molecules of hydrogen plus 1 molecule of oxygen
Oxygen and Hydrogen are not easily found in the atomic form, they immediately tend to the more stable "molecular" form; thats why the products of electrolysis are O2 and H2 , the molecular forms of Oxygen and Hydrogen.
Sure, one molecule of H2O provides only one oxygen, but should there just happen to be a second water molecule nearby, you could get O2 after releasing only 4 hydrogens. =)
sooo, and just how much does radio frequency generator consumes power.???
IF the amount of energy produced this way is bigger then energy required to power RF generation of such caliber, then this is quite neat and innovative. But this video shows none such evidence, therefore i think it's junk news.
Exactly. the energy that the RF generator uses is going to be ALWAYS higher than the energy liberated by the flame.
You guys think of water as the stable low energy state of Oxygen and Hydrogen combined, in order to separate those component we have to PROVIDE energy and we get a less stable (higher internal energy) mix of separated molecules of Hydrogen and Oxygen. Now those gases like to combine back into the lower energy form (water H2O) releasing the previously absorbed energy. Junk News.
Actually, not really junk news... There have been a number of guys who have done this since the 80s. The electricity used is in the order of a few hundred thousand volts, and about 45k htz (Tesla style), combined, from what Stanley Meier calls his 'voltage intensifier circuit' to reduce the AMPs. Reacts differently with the H2O molecule. Lots of stuff online about it.
having water, separating it into H2 + O2 and having water back as the result of a combustion while "gaining" energy in the process is just not possible... H2 is an energy carrier not an energy producer...
it is actually different to what you learned in school with electrolysis. There is no heat created with this process. Don't trust what you have studied in the past. Look it up online
Very true, energy is required. The form of electrolysis that is described here (if it is the same process that Stanley Meier uses) does produce hydrogen at room temperature... Therefore it requires a lot less energy and wastes a lot less energy, making it extremely efficient. The process was patented in the US, and last I heard, the patent ran out in June-ish 2007. People have been using this process to run their cars on water since the late 70s/early 80s.
Having an efficient electrolysis process is good for an H2 producer plant when we want to pump the produced H2 into our car "gas" tank.
But if your intention is to pump WATER into your "gas" tank things are different as there's no way any H2O separation process can achieve efficiencies higher than 1. As I said like 4 times before; separating water requires more energy than the one obtained back.
Chemical energy of the water is used in the process (hence why some disappears), just like the chemical energy in jet fuel is used in turbines. The difference is the jet fuel is atomised before it is ignited, where the water is separated using a different electrical volt/freq combination to the traditional method, much like what Tesla had powering the globes in his power station. I don't believe anyone is claiming to be achieving efficiency greater than 1. The process is well documented...
... The electrolysis method that you are referring to releases a lot of heat when the molecule returns to it's lower energy state, as you point out. The method above is different to what you would have been taught at school or university as very little heat is released. The different grade of electricity produces a different result and you can find lots of information about it online.
This guy also did lend a great deal to the concept of a Cure for Cancer. Carnegie Mellon is working on his Nanobot theory and they have already had lab tests that do work.
Scalar technology has been around for years.. just not known to the general public.. where they basically tune into the virus/illnesses resonance frequency and can specifically kill whatever they want.
according to what ive read anyway... interesting stuff
That depends upon whether the salt (NaCl) is serving as a catalyst or reactant that lowers the amount of external energy required to liberate the hydrogen (H2) and oxygen (O2) from the water (H2O). If that is the case, in effect the exothermic reaction "burns" salt to produce oxygen and hydrogen and then re-combines (burns) hydrogen and oxygen to produce water vapor.
The by products should be some clorate and sodium compund, maybe sodium clorate or sodium oxide or something, if it works.
Well, just look at the bulb that glows when he puts it into the beam. The energy he uses is very high. So the fact that he recovers a little energy does not amaze me.
I hope when he sells the patton for this idea he doesnt sell it to some oil company who sits on the patton for years before release a product. Did you see "Who Killed the Electric Car" GM ended up selling the controlling interest in a battery company they owned owned to either Exon or mobile
he died of cancer.. he was building the machine too cure himself and others with cancer! especially for youth who had cancer!. he would often see them after getting kemotherapy. and the tolls it took on there small boddies... he was a awsome man!! are hole city morned when he passed....
rocketrod101 9 months ago
he died from what he was trying too cure! unfortunately........there still testing his machine soon human trial will begin...... he was a awsome inventor!! in my home town here
rocketrod101 9 months ago
@rocketrod101 How did he die?
GhostThriller 9 months ago
where is this invention now????
rawfflecakes 10 months ago
so what has happened with this invention? it "died with him"? why hasn't this been further tested? it will save our civilization...
rawfflecakes 10 months ago
so, he died in 2009. really? he probably came up across one of the most important discoveries of this time and he just happen to die? hmmm doesnt sound suspecious to you? aww it really makes me sad to realize that this world has become soo adicted to oil and profit that they forget esential human principles. search for John_Kanzius on wikipedia
dantedom1 11 months ago
...and then the banker controlled government buys his patent, gives him a mansion, great healthcare, and lots of other goodies and the project is now suppressed. This is what's fucked up about our society, but other countries can build this stuff, and 300+ mph bullet trains, etc... but not us, too many fricking regulations. please visit INFOWARS.COM to change this and allow WE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE to use this technology.
libertyeagle777 1 year ago
a 57 Gigawatt nuclear plant is required to develop enough electricity to produce enough radio waves for a flame coming out of a test tube -
smde1 1 year ago
God Bless you I want to be just like you and I ask God to make me a reason for the development of this earth
Wisdombluetooth 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free Energy is real and it's here! The Big Oil companies r doing everything they can to stop this
information. If you want a Free energy magnet motor , get the blueprints at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM , Join the energy revolution!
lavernedi 1 year ago
Hope you make it--everyone else who has found the answer to those two things has been shot down (some literally), threatened, or demoted. But get this info out--people want it. Eventually the greedmongers will be overthrown by the masses of revolutionary people.
meyersonfire 1 year ago
Is the power output greater than the power input?
vendettura 1 year ago
yo use salt water to power boats, i demand 50 percent
clmjr78 2 years ago
here's the obvious question, what powers that giant radiowave machine?
evilsandwich2 2 years ago 17
Well.. Once the power exceeds the requirements of the giant radiowave machine, the saltwater powerplant would not consume power from the power grid, but charge power INTO it. You see... ALL powerplants need some power to go online.
The thing is: How efficient do they produce power?
VariusMayhem 2 years ago
Fossil fuels :P
The irony is not lost, I know.
azayles 1 year ago
@evilsandwich2 apparently theres a guy that has done this on a moped and he heats via a solar powered heater.
mrlanguageguy 1 year ago
@evilsandwich2 This video is completely missing the point. I don't understand how something SO PLAINLY OBVIOUS can be missed by a whole institution + a news channel. Turn off the RF generator and the flame will stop.
Not only that RF generators are NOT efficient. The heat produced by that flame will also be less than the electricity used to make the RF in the first place.
Also put that flame in a car engine and it will do nothing, not even slightly enough power to run an engine on.
beyondhelp00 7 months ago
@evilsandwich2 him jerking off
brilliantmojo 6 months ago
holy crap @ 13 years old im understanding benwith1n and masotta's "chat" lol...now i just need both to example it to me and i would 100% understand and copy probably. :)
maxinmaniac 2 years ago
Sorry meant "masotta"
bsquidwrd 2 years ago
Very nice Mossatta
bsquidwrd 2 years ago
That would be the best thing in the EORLD!!!
bsquidwrd 2 years ago
1:50 this guy cracks me up.
dieyoung 2 years ago
Comment removed
dieyoung 2 years ago
yo dawg water=/=element
mikotaku1 2 years ago
See it this way; I have water in my tank and with a terribly efficient electrolysis system I separate it into O2 & H2 then I send this mix to the cylinders then a spark and I receive energy, the product of the detonation is WATER that goes to the exhaust system, but I'm a very clever American then I routed my exhaust to my Gas tank then the Water level is always constant!!! and I invented the perpetual movement.... Please.... this is JUNK
masotta 2 years ago
How would you get O^2 from water?
H^2O two hydrogen one oxygen...
ace3695 2 years ago
separating water.
2 H2O -> 2 H2 + O2
2 molecules of water are converted into 2 molecules of hydrogen plus 1 molecule of oxygen
Oxygen and Hydrogen are not easily found in the atomic form, they immediately tend to the more stable "molecular" form; thats why the products of electrolysis are O2 and H2 , the molecular forms of Oxygen and Hydrogen.
masotta 2 years ago
Sure, one molecule of H2O provides only one oxygen, but should there just happen to be a second water molecule nearby, you could get O2 after releasing only 4 hydrogens. =)
Netnerp 1 year ago
R.I.P. Mr. Kanzius.
s0apscum 2 years ago
Comment removed
s0apscum 2 years ago
sooo, and just how much does radio frequency generator consumes power.???
IF the amount of energy produced this way is bigger then energy required to power RF generation of such caliber, then this is quite neat and innovative. But this video shows none such evidence, therefore i think it's junk news.
mgnapping 2 years ago 2
Exactly. the energy that the RF generator uses is going to be ALWAYS higher than the energy liberated by the flame.
You guys think of water as the stable low energy state of Oxygen and Hydrogen combined, in order to separate those component we have to PROVIDE energy and we get a less stable (higher internal energy) mix of separated molecules of Hydrogen and Oxygen. Now those gases like to combine back into the lower energy form (water H2O) releasing the previously absorbed energy. Junk News.
masotta 2 years ago
Actually, not really junk news... There have been a number of guys who have done this since the 80s. The electricity used is in the order of a few hundred thousand volts, and about 45k htz (Tesla style), combined, from what Stanley Meier calls his 'voltage intensifier circuit' to reduce the AMPs. Reacts differently with the H2O molecule. Lots of stuff online about it.
benwith1n 2 years ago
having water, separating it into H2 + O2 and having water back as the result of a combustion while "gaining" energy in the process is just not possible... H2 is an energy carrier not an energy producer...
masotta 2 years ago
it is actually different to what you learned in school with electrolysis. There is no heat created with this process. Don't trust what you have studied in the past. Look it up online
benwith1n 2 years ago
I'm not talking about electrolysis in the school but conservation of energy at College...
The molecule of water is very stable and requires ENERGY to separate its components (H2 +O2)...
When those components react get combined back into H20 molecules releasing NO MORE than the previously absorbed Energy...
At room temperature you cannot get Energy from the water molecule..
this is like a spring, you get energy from it ONLY if you provide energy to it
masotta 2 years ago
Very true, energy is required. The form of electrolysis that is described here (if it is the same process that Stanley Meier uses) does produce hydrogen at room temperature... Therefore it requires a lot less energy and wastes a lot less energy, making it extremely efficient. The process was patented in the US, and last I heard, the patent ran out in June-ish 2007. People have been using this process to run their cars on water since the late 70s/early 80s.
benwith1n 2 years ago
Having an efficient electrolysis process is good for an H2 producer plant when we want to pump the produced H2 into our car "gas" tank.
But if your intention is to pump WATER into your "gas" tank things are different as there's no way any H2O separation process can achieve efficiencies higher than 1. As I said like 4 times before; separating water requires more energy than the one obtained back.
H2 is an energy carrier....
H2O -is not- an energy source...
masotta 2 years ago
Chemical energy of the water is used in the process (hence why some disappears), just like the chemical energy in jet fuel is used in turbines. The difference is the jet fuel is atomised before it is ignited, where the water is separated using a different electrical volt/freq combination to the traditional method, much like what Tesla had powering the globes in his power station. I don't believe anyone is claiming to be achieving efficiency greater than 1. The process is well documented...
benwith1n 2 years ago
... The electrolysis method that you are referring to releases a lot of heat when the molecule returns to it's lower energy state, as you point out. The method above is different to what you would have been taught at school or university as very little heat is released. The different grade of electricity produces a different result and you can find lots of information about it online.
benwith1n 2 years ago
if you obtain from water more energy than the one used for separating its components of course the efficiency of the system has to be greater than 1.
Energy obtained/ Energy used > 1
And this is FALSE because water is not an energy source like gasoline.
Please stop talking about magic... this is just physics
masotta 2 years ago
Totally unbelievable but where is he now? probably told to shut up by the oil giants !!! ??
Intelliki 2 years ago
yeah it's awfull that you Americans have to pay 3 dollar about 1 gallon of gas -_-
RASVASINIKKA69 2 years ago
Absolutely retarded! Why not just take the power you are running the machine with and run an electric motor! This option would be FAR more efficient!
goobergel 2 years ago
amaizing
it made my day
daraghorban 2 years ago
Reminds me of Tesla's tuned resonance. Wonder where this guy is now?
justinjoyit13 2 years ago
This guy also did lend a great deal to the concept of a Cure for Cancer. Carnegie Mellon is working on his Nanobot theory and they have already had lab tests that do work.
1234uz 2 years ago
Scalar technology has been around for years.. just not known to the general public.. where they basically tune into the virus/illnesses resonance frequency and can specifically kill whatever they want.
according to what ive read anyway... interesting stuff
great video!
MaelMan82 2 years ago
Show a flame and everybody goes "why arnt we using this?" well the generation of the radio waves is why.
Energy in vs. Energy out.
TheFluffyDuck 3 years ago
That depends upon whether the salt (NaCl) is serving as a catalyst or reactant that lowers the amount of external energy required to liberate the hydrogen (H2) and oxygen (O2) from the water (H2O). If that is the case, in effect the exothermic reaction "burns" salt to produce oxygen and hydrogen and then re-combines (burns) hydrogen and oxygen to produce water vapor.
The by products should be some clorate and sodium compund, maybe sodium clorate or sodium oxide or something, if it works.
BruceD1776 2 years ago 5
wow hot newscaster
obigalish 3 years ago
70 Bucks a week for gas where i live
JamesBond0034 3 years ago
hehe thats nothing like sweden ...
omgomg113 2 years ago
189 for gas were i live...
ottowaton 3 years ago
I wonder how much energy is required to generate those sounds waves that are hitting the salt water to make it burn?
highmountaingee 3 years ago 2
Well, just look at the bulb that glows when he puts it into the beam. The energy he uses is very high. So the fact that he recovers a little energy does not amaze me.
predictorm9 3 years ago
I hope when he sells the patton for this idea he doesnt sell it to some oil company who sits on the patton for years before release a product. Did you see "Who Killed the Electric Car" GM ended up selling the controlling interest in a battery company they owned owned to either Exon or mobile
youtubupete 4 years ago
I don't understand the value of reposting someting thats already on the site
TheRooster602 4 years ago 2