Is this the only science based coverage of the Holographic Principle on YT ? --- 99% of the rest is a lot of new-age quackery, pseudo-scientific junkery and complete and total quasi-religious BS --- just the hard science please !
@IoPizzaPlanet Philosophically, it actually goes back into Descartes idea that the universe we see is controlled by an evil genius manipulating our minds into seeing, hearing, and touching.Something like being plugged into the Matrix.However, going into this line of logic is rather redundant since you can't prove whether we are actually being controlled by an evil genius or we are not controlled by any kind of evil genius where the world of free will exists
Writer Stanislaw Lem predicted this in 1960-ties. Matter and energy have mass. Information is neither matter nor energy, yet there is. So it should have mass. LOL According to this Big Bang was ignited by concentration of information. Obiit animus, natur est atomus!
I'm sorry, but I don't know if anyone has made this observation, but his walking back and forth is annoying. Don't get me wrong, the guy may be smart, but stop walking and just talk. Damn!!!!
All he did is describe what a brain landscape is like from the perspective of being inside the brain. Its ALL thought. its all process, an unfathomable quantity of processes working independently yet together to arrive at an unknown conclusion. There is a fail safe mechanism in place to stop all of it when the signal is given. If you have seen inception then the basic concept is discussed there. Its all about perspective. Being in the brain is not the same as observing it.
So the world is a hologram, and it's made up of qubits instead of matter, energy, space, or time. This is cool. It puts a whole knew spin on the idea of "speaking the universe into existence."
Just "say" the lines of code, and out pops the Big Bang.
I must say this complete destruction of a the materialist safety blanket must have the new atheists peeing in their pants.
Actually, no prominent Atheist I know of on YouTube gives a crap about the Holographic Principle, or seems to take the notion of the world being a hologram seriously. In fact, that only Atheists that seem to care about it at all are me and Jedisenior
The only Atheist on Youtube, which reaches the entire world, who actually cares about it enough to make a video trying to oppose it in anyway, is me(AFAIK). So either Atheists don't care about it, or don't think it's a threat.
@Dhorpatan You only care about it BTW because you want to hold to presupposed views on the origins of the universe, NOT because of atheism. In fact there are plenty of atheists who don't think the universe is eternal. And being in physics I can list off a number of atheists immediately who think the universe is a hologram.
@Jasonator1000 - It also puts a whole new spin on the idea of "vomiting the universe into existence," depending on which imaginary god you believe in. Jason, you're a jerk.
@Jasonator1000 Why would atheists care, to be an atheists is only to not believe in god that's all. In no place does this prove god ? So, we dont care ? Just watch the video and learn or think, keep your religious bullshit in the church. people dont care.
@Jasonator1000 You're completely misunderstanding the situation. It's the non-locality implied by the holographic principle which caused Hawking to concede his long running bet that information was lost in a black hole. Conservation of information is a central principle of modern physics. You probably don't understand enough about physics to appreciate the significance. But far from being disturbing, it's actually a demonstration that modern physics is on solid ground.
@Jasonator1000 It only appears that way to you because of your religious goggles. Even if this hypothesis turns out to be correct, does not answer any questions about the existence of God/s.
@Jasonator1000 You make it sound like you believe in a magic. Even if the word is a hologram (sounds plausible to me) and even entirely virtual (have you run across the simulation hypothesis?), all metaphysical claims still remain speculative. But just to be clear, even if it becomes increasingly clear that the physics in our universe aren't basement level physics so to speak, this is absolutely not any indication that any biblical (or Quranic) claims of a personal God are remotely true.
@thinkahol "You make it sound like you believe in a magic."
"even if it becomes increasingly clear that the physics in our universe aren't basement level physics so to speak, this is absolutely not any indication that any biblical"
Well let's see what the physics would look like if you could hypothetically hack the hologram (assuming the technology were available):
@thinkahol Observe that the event horizon only exists for an outside observer - a singularity for us. A special property of this outside view is that anything that is tossed into a black whole freezes in time on the event horizon and thus for us the information is preserve while from the stuffs viewpoint nothing special happens and all information about the stuff is eventually destroyed in that pathological singularity but that is okay as that event never takes place for us outsiders.
@Jasonator1000 A scientist says something and, boom, soon a theist is there and fills in the every single blanks with 'Look god did that!"... so unusual.
What the lecture tells, and teach use, is that information is never lost AND that there is a deep and profound connection between matter (which basically the theory of gravity is about) and information (which basically quantum mechanics is about) which we just only start to learn about.
Why not just say that we live inside of a singularity and that the world we interpret around us is a hologram projected by the horizon of our own universe? Saves 54 minutes
The comments below are indicative of why I HATE discussions involving terms such as "quantum", "extra dimentions", "consciousness"..............these words are floating abstractions that superstitious/religious nuts use to hide their pet irrationalities.
the last thought-experiment he mentioned, the maximum amount of information which can be sampled by light rays during gravitational collapse, just before a singularity is reached, is blindingly wonderful. there's no a priori reason all these different lines of reasoning should end up all pointing towards "holography". yet they do. seems like some deep principle is at work here...
By the way smartguy...look for a current website offerring $5000 8to whomever can prove the earth is not flat! Thats right, but according to you this idea was dispensed of before Columbus, funny this challenge is on even now, seems impossible but just sayin'
You can offer that amount of money and refuse any payment with regards to semantics since the scientific prove is not a legal term. And since you don't want to actually pay the money there is no incentive to adjust the terms in a way that do constitute a legally binding challenge. You can just keep up the original page forever.
Now you are being childish, I would cite countless references but swine are not aware of the value of pearls, therefore I will offer no further intellectual jewelry to you. Next I will be forced to prove water is wet then where will we be?
Sorry to come across in a stereotypical christian fashion but its true, example is although we would love to explore space all evidence of a moon landing contadicts that we achieved it. We are in a controlled environment which is the reason I watched this video in the first place, I expected a ''Truman show of the mind'' concept and I think thats what he is alluding to.
I don't understand... how can it be that the original singularity of the Big Bang is positied to have been very small and yet spawned the many larger singularities within the many Black Holes? Or is it only that the Horizon is bigger, but the Hole is actually much smaller?
@WoundedEgo The singularity is small, and can't actually be seen or otherwise detected in any way. The size of the event horizon will be proportionate to the mass of the singularity. The singularity that existed prior to the big bang wouldn't actually have an event horizon, for two reasons. One, there was no matter or space by which to define the event horizon, and two the physical laws that govern our universe were not in place prior to the big bang. By mass, the big bang singularity is bigger.
How can you possibly find truth in science when you cant find truth in its creator? We are on a ''need to know'' basis right now, no advancement of ANY noteriety will occur until after the selection process is over. Worry less about how our universe is designed and more about WHY? If you doubt what I am saying simply listen to the last minute of the video again! He DOES NOT KNOW!!!! And won't
The answers are in the bible. There are hundreds of scriptures that are clues to those seeking truth. For example Psalm 19:6 says about our sun ''from one extremity of the heavens is its going forth. And its finished circuit is to the other extremeties. And there is nothing concealed from its heat......ONE BIG ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT
@thejahoflife Oh, just shut up. You won't listen to this guy, but you'll listen to the people who wrote the bible thousands of years ago who didn't even know what the solar system is? You cherry pick one verse that you interpret to allegorically mean something that is observable, but you ignore the THOUSANDS of internal contradictions and flat out WRONG statements in the same book. Start using your brain.
@tml4873 You wrote that the bible writers were ignorant of science, yet it is the bible that says the earth is round, not flat and that it is hanging on nothing. Also the entire water cycle is explained in detail in the bible. All 3 of these facts were written thousands of years before they were understood. The explorers including Columbus thought they would fall off the earth....that was 1492!!!! I do use my brain. Thanks
@thejahoflife The earth is a sphere. The bible makes references to seeing from one end of the earth to the other. How do you do that on a sphere? The bible also says there's a firmament upon which all the heavenly bodies rest. Again, wrong. The earth is not "hanging on nothing", so you AND the bible are wrong there. No one thought Columbus was going to fall off the edge of the earth in 1492, that is an urban legend, which goes to show the depth of your research. PLEASE start using your brain.
No where in the bible is written that the earth is a sphere. There is a passage which states that to god it looks like a circle. Cricle is not sphere.
Earth is not "hanging on nothing" in any way.
Also no where in the bible is there explanation of the water cycle in any way.
If Columbus thought he was going to fall of the earth... THEN WHY THE FUCK HE WENT TO SEARCH ANOTHER WAY TO FUCKING INDIA RIGHT TO THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION WHERE IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN IF HE THOUGHT EARTH IS FLAT!!!
perhaps this 2D world of information theory suggests its all in our heads. Think about it perhaps the information are 2D signals flowing through our mind, this is just somesort of a dream if you may, whoknows?
good lecture but I'm getting seasick watching him sway back and forward. Also, the character says 原子 'genshi' or atom in Japanese (and likely Chinese too)
an excellent video and grateful for it and Bousso's presentation. That said, He and other scientists / professors could do with a public speaking class or two to curb some nad habits. His pacing in place is extremely distracting and breaks one of the biggest rules of public speaking. Its ants-in-the-pants syndrome lol
@smarthandsomeguy just finished that book, but couldn't comprehend the black hole evaporation process which was the reason of reading it in the first place. gonna read it again
doesn't the very act of recording information add information, so is it even possible to know the state of a system without interference from 'that which looks', and
any information about the universe is intrinsically not separate from the knower, therefore, watcher investigate thyself. - my 2 bitz
@rigelmajor I'd recommend reading the book The Black Hole War by Dr. Leonard Susskind, the main theme of which is about information loss/Hawking Paradox. He was the guy who opposed Hawkings and proved that information is never lost the consequence of which is the holographic principal.
@muzammilali007 I took your advice re The Black hole war. A good read, it's the first time i've seen a decent explanation of entropy, so thanks for that. A note, any position is just that, a position, including the position that information exists, and that it is bounded (read definable), therefore separate. From the position of the universe, there is no person who looks and no information to be kept . Or so I say
@UCtelevision Perhaps you could have Dr. Susskind lecture on this subject? This was interesting, but unless you already are familiar with the Holographic Principle this "introduction" is not so "friendly". Thanks for the lectures.
@washmlakid I agree. Susskind's "Black Hole Wars" does a better job. Susskind has done the best job in explaining the Holograhic Principle, but I still think that he misses something key. Our universe is both holographic and 3-D, but both not observable at the same time. Its like Bob and Alice black hole experiment, Alice stuck on the horizon according to Bob, holographic, but Alice crossed the event horizon to Alice, 3-D, both correct, but not at the same time or there would be two Alices.
It's interesting applying the holographic principle to other areas to see what it says. In cosmology for example it shows why the Big Bang had to happen and why the universe is always expanding rather than contracting: watch?v=5xqztxP0SJc
Very interesting talk, I definitely enjoyed it. I just have to say, however, i wish dude would stand still for like two seconds. I got seasick watching this.
Very fascinating stuff! The last 10 to 15 minutes were a bit over my head so i ll prolly have to watch it a few more times but this relationschip between information content and surface area explained by using black holes was very well done! Thx!
you are an idiot !!! just as all before you...go buy HOUSE, GET A WIFE, BUY A CAR AND SOME FURNITURE AND WONDER....WHILE WE TEACH THE TRUTH that you go in circles.... bla bla blah!!! you speak babyl...as your fathers and theirs!! Einstein was a fool...!!! yes I said it and Im drunk...youre an idiot! you are the reason things never change....
Misleading title. He didn't even use the word "holographic" once in this whole lecture, and so I'm left about as confused as before I watched it. Entropy = surface area, or something. Okay, I'll take your word for it, I guess...
@sodaslacks The property that information in a given 3-dimensional space can be encoded on a 2-dimensional surface is holographic. Many conventional holograms consist of information encoded on a 2-dimensional surface, which, when illuminated properly, produces a 3-dimensional image.
I understood that much, although your explanation did make it a bit clearer. My point is, for an "introduction" to holographics this lecture wasn't very educational. If I didn't already have an idea of how holographics work, I'd probably be even more confused. I would've saved an hour of my life if he had just explained it the way you did, instead of forcing us to infer the point.
I understood that much. It's just that, as a layman "introduction" to holographics, this wasn't very educational. I can only imagine how confused I would be if I didn't already have a minimal understanding of holographics to begin with. He took too long to explain the main point, and didn't attempt to relate it to the title subject. It's interesting, sure, but wasn't made relevant.
come on guys. it's a load of crap. which is easier to believe? scientists don't understand black holes 100% or we flat creatures living in a 2D world?
I didn't catch that he was suggesting that the information was written on the event horizon. I think the point is that the entropy (equals information capacity) of a black hole is no larger than the surface area of the event horizon in Planck area units.
NEXT TIME BUDDY,, DO ME A FAVOR,,, SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSTTTTTTAAAAAAYYYYYYYY STTTTTILLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL!!!!!!!!!!! YOU ,OVE TO MUCH FORWARDS AND BACKWARDS,, U TRY TO GET EVERYONEDIZZY??? GEEZZZ..
All the matter in our universe has been consumed by a black hole at some point back in time, and also since light cannot escape the membrane of this universe in which we experience.
Inside a blackhole in our universe is another universe.
@hipstarchild Very interesting. Do you have any information you want to share to back it up? Funny as I was watching the video I started having a strong sense that we were already inside the black hole. Recursive embedded universes? Very interesting.
(2) How large of a sphere of ~U235 would be required to create a "smallest" black hole?
(3) How does this "initial/terrestrial" mass-density relate to energy required for collapse?
(4) Once this tiniest hole is created, can it be "un-done"?
(5) If a micro-hole cannot be un-done, can the permanent gravitational attraction be "harnessed"? ... How does this "leverage" compare to permanent magnets?
@phrankus2009 I don't have all of your answers, but a Planck-mass black hole would evaporate immediately. The Planck mass is believed to be about 20 micrograms. This is effectively the minimum mass for a black hole.
Some "effective" academics are great because thaey are effective abstract theorists ... Others are great (academically) because they are great communicators. Raphael? ... You are clearly both, and very charismatic and engaging, "to boot". I love the way you managed the scope of this lecture ... I am truly entriched !
Theoretical physics does not tell us anything about reality, it merely exposes the paradoxial nature of the premises and flawed assumptions and on which it's based
String theory is not theory, because it have not been tested at the proper scales. I call it String Metaphysics ( I absolutely do not mean New Age Metaphysics which is a pseudoscience with no scientific basis). I have not read anyone's professional paper showing any proof or proofs that the String theory does exist. Mathematical rigors do not make a theory.
@margheritazevecke I agree completely. It should be noted that String Theory is not a really promising field. Why? Because it's computational, not componential. There is more than a subtle difference. It's bullshit. A "flowery" way of expressing dimensional abstracts. String Theory is metaphysics not so cleverly disguised by impatient physicists who simply lack the intellectual capacity to mindfully deconstruct the finite. I would go so far as to say it is pseudo-science.
@NathanaelSaintCyr Nah. It's only pseudo science because the scope of what it is trying to tie together is beyond our current comprehension. The truth of what we are, and what we live in,and the dimensions of it all might be eventually able to be understood by science...but there is no way you could deconstruct it into finite terms. Scientists try, but understand so little. Besides, most of the most brilliant scientists in our time were somewhat interested in 'metaphysics.'
@EuroPowa, they actually see god at work. There is no way I can describe to you how in 500 charecters but the bible has been teaching this for millenia now. The simplest way I can say it here is as above so below. The whole universe is fractal. becasue the universe is fractal the more we try to learn about our place in the universe they more we learn we have no place. this may seem incoherant and wierd but trust me its all in the bible. You just have to believe to see and if you dont you won
Perhaps a stupid question, but when talking about surface area of a black hole, is he treating the surface area of the event horizon and the surface area of the collapsed matter itself as if they were one in the same?
The most informative and enlightening public access introduction to the holographic principle I've been able to find. If only documentaries on the so called learning stations would air material with this much substance. Thankyou!
Thank you for your excellent presentation on the holographic principle~ my husband, dr kitty and i are fascinated by black holes, string theory(ies) etc.. I'm trying to explain these theories to my family in NY:) your video is perfect~!
Excellent talk - I'm new to this holographic principle thing, this made a lot of things very clear for me.
Not sure what he's getting at from 52:00 to 54:00 though... I'm guessing that he's saying that it doesn't seem to be possible to imagine a physical observer consistent with general relativity who could measure a loss of information or a decrease in entropy, which suggests even more strongly that this principle is remarkably solid. If so, then I'm happy to take his word for it. :)
Thank Buddha I already know this stuff. I had to turn off the lecture after 3 minutes because I simply cannot abide by his saying "ok" after every 3rd syllable.
next time film the overheads and not the presenter when given the choice. Hearing him is the important thing. Not seeing the overheads clearly and instead seeing his constantly moving frame is very off putting.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Time, space and gravity are illusions. The universe is continually created and resolving it doesnt expand into something, theres no edge, no "size" Entangle entities occupy same space. Not so entangled entities appearing separate to observers. As matter resolves, the illusion of space collapses between them as observed as gravitational attraction and motion as wave functions presses to in-phase becoming one. Cosmic red shift is illusion of matter shrinking not an expanding universe.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The author Alexander Lowen reminds us that Freud as a jew has developed a fatalist view of life hence his Edipo's psychiatric metaphor. This is about we cannot avoid our fate. Lowen says that by accepting our fate we can at least make it less tragic. So, maybe the constrain imposed by Godel's Theorem may prove to be fundamenal to do teleportation!
Would it by necessity have a relationship between Boussos's desire to get an accout of the information content of the room he is in and the information his mind is absorbing through his several senses from the near environment?
Comment removed
andy7666 6 days ago
Think, Virtual Reality...
HDvids101 2 months ago
Is this the only science based coverage of the Holographic Principle on YT ? --- 99% of the rest is a lot of new-age quackery, pseudo-scientific junkery and complete and total quasi-religious BS --- just the hard science please !
149PCE 3 months ago 3
this guy looks like he is on a boat in a storm...stop swaying
1111MANA 3 months ago
one day i will sit through all 54:35 of this video... one day
honestyize 3 months ago
watch?v=luHyeZffTvI
TheCavecricket 3 months ago
stop moving so damn much
SpiritMolecule1 3 months ago
pleeease stop dancing.. my eyeeees!!!
jimth2009 4 months ago
Doin the dance!!
Trailer1220 4 months ago
yo mama's a hologram
kokotxaband 4 months ago
240p? Was this recorded on a calculator??
DANEMAN5 5 months ago
@DANEMAN5 yet it looks clear and works well and efficiently. Why waste bandwidth on unnecessary detail?
IceFAAng 4 months ago
So the world is both a hologram and a quantum computer according to Seth Lloyd, making the universe look something like this: watch?v=Jzfj4R52Q6I
And if we could hypothetically "hack" this computer it would manipulate the hologram like this: watch?v=TufKcBa5RaI
Does anyone know what to make of this? I stumbled onto this, and I'm quite curious.
IoPizzaPlanet 5 months ago 5
@IoPizzaPlanet Philosophically, it actually goes back into Descartes idea that the universe we see is controlled by an evil genius manipulating our minds into seeing, hearing, and touching.Something like being plugged into the Matrix.However, going into this line of logic is rather redundant since you can't prove whether we are actually being controlled by an evil genius or we are not controlled by any kind of evil genius where the world of free will exists
mdaniel22 3 months ago
Comment removed
IoPizzaPlanet 2 months ago
@mdaniel22 Well just watch this video and you'll see what made me curious: watch?v=TufKcBa5RaI
BTW, it's not the Simulation Argument.
IoPizzaPlanet 2 months ago
Writer Stanislaw Lem predicted this in 1960-ties. Matter and energy have mass. Information is neither matter nor energy, yet there is. So it should have mass. LOL According to this Big Bang was ignited by concentration of information. Obiit animus, natur est atomus!
TheArtmedia 5 months ago
he looks like Neo
Ferron007 5 months ago 3
Just give me the code man - THE CODE! Now!
owenpeter3 5 months ago
I'm sorry, but I don't know if anyone has made this observation, but his walking back and forth is annoying. Don't get me wrong, the guy may be smart, but stop walking and just talk. Damn!!!!
jamdev12 5 months ago
@jamdev12 He's pacing, meaning he's nervous. He's INCREDIBLY nervous, it does get better as the video goes on, but he still paces.
HerGuardianAngel1991 5 months ago
All he did is describe what a brain landscape is like from the perspective of being inside the brain. Its ALL thought. its all process, an unfathomable quantity of processes working independently yet together to arrive at an unknown conclusion. There is a fail safe mechanism in place to stop all of it when the signal is given. If you have seen inception then the basic concept is discussed there. Its all about perspective. Being in the brain is not the same as observing it.
thejahoflife 6 months ago
So the world is a hologram, and it's made up of qubits instead of matter, energy, space, or time. This is cool. It puts a whole knew spin on the idea of "speaking the universe into existence."
Just "say" the lines of code, and out pops the Big Bang.
I must say this complete destruction of a the materialist safety blanket must have the new atheists peeing in their pants.
Jasonator1000 6 months ago 31
@Jasonator1000
Actually, no prominent Atheist I know of on YouTube gives a crap about the Holographic Principle, or seems to take the notion of the world being a hologram seriously. In fact, that only Atheists that seem to care about it at all are me and Jedisenior
The only Atheist on Youtube, which reaches the entire world, who actually cares about it enough to make a video trying to oppose it in anyway, is me(AFAIK). So either Atheists don't care about it, or don't think it's a threat.
Dhorpatan 5 months ago
Comment removed
JohananRaatz 5 months ago
@Dhorpatan You only care about it BTW because you want to hold to presupposed views on the origins of the universe, NOT because of atheism. In fact there are plenty of atheists who don't think the universe is eternal. And being in physics I can list off a number of atheists immediately who think the universe is a hologram.
JohananRaatz 5 months ago
@Jasonator1000 - It also puts a whole new spin on the idea of "vomiting the universe into existence," depending on which imaginary god you believe in. Jason, you're a jerk.
MultiNaturalist 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MultiNaturalist "depending on which imaginary god you believe in."
The Universal Orch-OR one, and no it's not imaginary look up "Paola Zizzi" and "The Big Wow" on google.
Here: watch?v=Kj8UdHuP5l8
Jasonator1000 5 months ago
@Jasonator1000 Why would atheists care, to be an atheists is only to not believe in god that's all. In no place does this prove god ? So, we dont care ? Just watch the video and learn or think, keep your religious bullshit in the church. people dont care.
tperley 5 months ago
@Jasonator1000 You're completely misunderstanding the situation. It's the non-locality implied by the holographic principle which caused Hawking to concede his long running bet that information was lost in a black hole. Conservation of information is a central principle of modern physics. You probably don't understand enough about physics to appreciate the significance. But far from being disturbing, it's actually a demonstration that modern physics is on solid ground.
sbergman27 4 months ago
@Jasonator1000 It only appears that way to you because of your religious goggles. Even if this hypothesis turns out to be correct, does not answer any questions about the existence of God/s.
Mike2103c 4 months ago 3
@Jasonator1000 And yet none of this "proves" god.
courtlandmcdaniel 3 months ago
@Jasonator1000 You make it sound like you believe in a magic. Even if the word is a hologram (sounds plausible to me) and even entirely virtual (have you run across the simulation hypothesis?), all metaphysical claims still remain speculative. But just to be clear, even if it becomes increasingly clear that the physics in our universe aren't basement level physics so to speak, this is absolutely not any indication that any biblical (or Quranic) claims of a personal God are remotely true.
thinkahol 3 months ago 3
Comment removed
Jasonator1000 3 months ago
Comment removed
Jasonator1000 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@thinkahol "You make it sound like you believe in a magic."
"even if it becomes increasingly clear that the physics in our universe aren't basement level physics so to speak, this is absolutely not any indication that any biblical"
Well let's see what the physics would look like if you could hypothetically hack the hologram (assuming the technology were available):
watch?v=Jzfj4R52Q6I
&
watch?v=TufKcBa5RaI
Jasonator1000 1 month ago 5
@thinkahol Observe that the event horizon only exists for an outside observer - a singularity for us. A special property of this outside view is that anything that is tossed into a black whole freezes in time on the event horizon and thus for us the information is preserve while from the stuffs viewpoint nothing special happens and all information about the stuff is eventually destroyed in that pathological singularity but that is okay as that event never takes place for us outsiders.
jomen112 1 week ago
@Jasonator1000 A scientist says something and, boom, soon a theist is there and fills in the every single blanks with 'Look god did that!"... so unusual.
What the lecture tells, and teach use, is that information is never lost AND that there is a deep and profound connection between matter (which basically the theory of gravity is about) and information (which basically quantum mechanics is about) which we just only start to learn about.
jomen112 1 week ago
Why not just say that we live inside of a singularity and that the world we interpret around us is a hologram projected by the horizon of our own universe? Saves 54 minutes
hurley3kgt 6 months ago
@hurley3kgt hahahahahaah thats great!
kreno11234 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The comments below are indicative of why I HATE discussions involving terms such as "quantum", "extra dimentions", "consciousness"..............these words are floating abstractions that superstitious/religious nuts use to hide their pet irrationalities.
threebobs 6 months ago
holy fucking christ more bible thumpers here too?!
Artfryne 6 months ago 3
@Artfryne
They are everywhere...
BlizBob 6 months ago
the last thought-experiment he mentioned, the maximum amount of information which can be sampled by light rays during gravitational collapse, just before a singularity is reached, is blindingly wonderful. there's no a priori reason all these different lines of reasoning should end up all pointing towards "holography". yet they do. seems like some deep principle is at work here...
commodoreherring 6 months ago
This has become one of my fave YouTube vids -
dracd235 6 months ago
By the way smartguy...look for a current website offerring $5000 8to whomever can prove the earth is not flat! Thats right, but according to you this idea was dispensed of before Columbus, funny this challenge is on even now, seems impossible but just sayin'
thejahoflife 6 months ago
@thejahoflife
You can offer that amount of money and refuse any payment with regards to semantics since the scientific prove is not a legal term. And since you don't want to actually pay the money there is no incentive to adjust the terms in a way that do constitute a legally binding challenge. You can just keep up the original page forever.
Got it?
awelux 5 months ago
Now you are being childish, I would cite countless references but swine are not aware of the value of pearls, therefore I will offer no further intellectual jewelry to you. Next I will be forced to prove water is wet then where will we be?
thejahoflife 6 months ago
Sorry to come across in a stereotypical christian fashion but its true, example is although we would love to explore space all evidence of a moon landing contadicts that we achieved it. We are in a controlled environment which is the reason I watched this video in the first place, I expected a ''Truman show of the mind'' concept and I think thats what he is alluding to.
thejahoflife 6 months ago
I don't understand... how can it be that the original singularity of the Big Bang is positied to have been very small and yet spawned the many larger singularities within the many Black Holes? Or is it only that the Horizon is bigger, but the Hole is actually much smaller?
WoundedEgo 6 months ago
@WoundedEgo The singularity is small, and can't actually be seen or otherwise detected in any way. The size of the event horizon will be proportionate to the mass of the singularity. The singularity that existed prior to the big bang wouldn't actually have an event horizon, for two reasons. One, there was no matter or space by which to define the event horizon, and two the physical laws that govern our universe were not in place prior to the big bang. By mass, the big bang singularity is bigger.
tml4873 6 months ago
I really like the fact that he speak loud.i expected i would strugle to hear anything.
69BearPedo 6 months ago
MAJOR_NOTE:Entropy of the given
space must be less than or equal to
surface area of space which is the same as the surface area
of the blackhole.
nickabenson 7 months ago
How can you possibly find truth in science when you cant find truth in its creator? We are on a ''need to know'' basis right now, no advancement of ANY noteriety will occur until after the selection process is over. Worry less about how our universe is designed and more about WHY? If you doubt what I am saying simply listen to the last minute of the video again! He DOES NOT KNOW!!!! And won't
thejahoflife 7 months ago
The answers are in the bible. There are hundreds of scriptures that are clues to those seeking truth. For example Psalm 19:6 says about our sun ''from one extremity of the heavens is its going forth. And its finished circuit is to the other extremeties. And there is nothing concealed from its heat......ONE BIG ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT
thejahoflife 7 months ago
@thejahoflife Oh, just shut up. You won't listen to this guy, but you'll listen to the people who wrote the bible thousands of years ago who didn't even know what the solar system is? You cherry pick one verse that you interpret to allegorically mean something that is observable, but you ignore the THOUSANDS of internal contradictions and flat out WRONG statements in the same book. Start using your brain.
tml4873 6 months ago
@tml4873 You wrote that the bible writers were ignorant of science, yet it is the bible that says the earth is round, not flat and that it is hanging on nothing. Also the entire water cycle is explained in detail in the bible. All 3 of these facts were written thousands of years before they were understood. The explorers including Columbus thought they would fall off the earth....that was 1492!!!! I do use my brain. Thanks
thejahoflife 6 months ago
@thejahoflife The earth is a sphere. The bible makes references to seeing from one end of the earth to the other. How do you do that on a sphere? The bible also says there's a firmament upon which all the heavenly bodies rest. Again, wrong. The earth is not "hanging on nothing", so you AND the bible are wrong there. No one thought Columbus was going to fall off the edge of the earth in 1492, that is an urban legend, which goes to show the depth of your research. PLEASE start using your brain.
tml4873 6 months ago
@thejahoflife
No where in the bible is written that the earth is a sphere. There is a passage which states that to god it looks like a circle. Cricle is not sphere.
Earth is not "hanging on nothing" in any way.
Also no where in the bible is there explanation of the water cycle in any way.
If Columbus thought he was going to fall of the earth... THEN WHY THE FUCK HE WENT TO SEARCH ANOTHER WAY TO FUCKING INDIA RIGHT TO THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION WHERE IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN IF HE THOUGHT EARTH IS FLAT!!!
BlizBob 6 months ago
Matter doesn't matter if it matters at all when there's noting to matter
starview1 7 months ago
Blinding!!!
dandunleavy 7 months ago
I like this guy.
EquinoxParadox91 7 months ago
That's not a hologram; it's an overhead projector
Yaheuben66 8 months ago
very interesting, but the person who was filming needs to be smacked hard.
ThePrelude27 8 months ago
4 people have very low IQs
Pr0metheusMusic 8 months ago
perhaps this 2D world of information theory suggests its all in our heads. Think about it perhaps the information are 2D signals flowing through our mind, this is just somesort of a dream if you may, whoknows?
deanmullen10 9 months ago
good lecture but I'm getting seasick watching him sway back and forward. Also, the character says 原子 'genshi' or atom in Japanese (and likely Chinese too)
stoltobot 9 months ago
good lecture but I'm getting seasick watching him sway back and forward
stoltobot 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
an excellent video and grateful for it and Bousso's presentation. That said, He and other scientists / professors could do with a public speaking class or two to curb some nad habits. His pacing in place is extremely distracting and breaks one of the biggest rules of public speaking. Its ants-in-the-pants syndrome lol
ocerg1111 9 months ago
Comment removed
ocerg1111 9 months ago
Black hole wars
smarthandsomeguy 9 months ago
@smarthandsomeguy just finished that book, but couldn't comprehend the black hole evaporation process which was the reason of reading it in the first place. gonna read it again
muzammilali007 9 months ago
doesn't the very act of recording information add information, so is it even possible to know the state of a system without interference from 'that which looks', and
any information about the universe is intrinsically not separate from the knower, therefore, watcher investigate thyself. - my 2 bitz
rigelmajor 10 months ago
@rigelmajor I'd recommend reading the book The Black Hole War by Dr. Leonard Susskind, the main theme of which is about information loss/Hawking Paradox. He was the guy who opposed Hawkings and proved that information is never lost the consequence of which is the holographic principal.
muzammilali007 9 months ago
@muzammilali007 I took your advice re The Black hole war. A good read, it's the first time i've seen a decent explanation of entropy, so thanks for that. A note, any position is just that, a position, including the position that information exists, and that it is bounded (read definable), therefore separate. From the position of the universe, there is no person who looks and no information to be kept . Or so I say
rigelmajor 7 months ago
That dude knows his shit!
p4h10oso 10 months ago 6
@UCtelevision Perhaps you could have Dr. Susskind lecture on this subject? This was interesting, but unless you already are familiar with the Holographic Principle this "introduction" is not so "friendly". Thanks for the lectures.
washmlakid 11 months ago
@washmlakid I agree. Susskind's "Black Hole Wars" does a better job. Susskind has done the best job in explaining the Holograhic Principle, but I still think that he misses something key. Our universe is both holographic and 3-D, but both not observable at the same time. Its like Bob and Alice black hole experiment, Alice stuck on the horizon according to Bob, holographic, but Alice crossed the event horizon to Alice, 3-D, both correct, but not at the same time or there would be two Alices.
freedomfrombots 10 months ago
very interesting could you do a video on string theory?
harrycheslaw 11 months ago
i didnt know kassemg knew so much about physics
Yajirobi 11 months ago
Thank you for uploading. I've been looking for a more in depth while still layman's explanation of the holographic principle. Fascinating.
chodaboy51500 11 months ago
version in spanish ????
please¡¡¡
reptilectrikcr 11 months ago
That's how reality 2.0 is gonna be created!
rapperzondernaam 11 months ago
It's interesting applying the holographic principle to other areas to see what it says. In cosmology for example it shows why the Big Bang had to happen and why the universe is always expanding rather than contracting: watch?v=5xqztxP0SJc
JohananRaatz 11 months ago
nothing against him, he is very good! and this was very interesting! only thing is... Carl Sagan could say "Cosmos" way cooler <3
W1kk3dMango 1 year ago
Somebody fix that toilet so this guy can stop all this moving around.
amaolud78 1 year ago 2
I couldn't watch it for this reason. Too bad.
natemullikin 1 year ago
Very interesting talk, I definitely enjoyed it. I just have to say, however, i wish dude would stand still for like two seconds. I got seasick watching this.
shaggyhag 1 year ago 5
@shaggyhag if the camera was zoomed out you wouldn't notice as much.
defect530 9 months ago
@shaggyhag lol after reading your comment i actually thought about using my video stabilizer on this video.
AudioAndroid 9 months ago
@shaggyhag :D hehehe...
pressdesign 7 months ago
Very fascinating stuff! The last 10 to 15 minutes were a bit over my head so i ll prolly have to watch it a few more times but this relationschip between information content and surface area explained by using black holes was very well done! Thx!
DaFreak4ever 1 year ago
i never do this but...this is retarded!
ianlutz 1 year ago
you are an idiot !!! just as all before you...go buy HOUSE, GET A WIFE, BUY A CAR AND SOME FURNITURE AND WONDER....WHILE WE TEACH THE TRUTH that you go in circles.... bla bla blah!!! you speak babyl...as your fathers and theirs!! Einstein was a fool...!!! yes I said it and Im drunk...youre an idiot! you are the reason things never change....
ianlutz 1 year ago
alguien que le ponga subtitulos al español para los que no hablamos ingles este tema es muy interesante
reptilectrikcr 1 year ago
alguien que le ponga subtitulos al español para los que no hablamos ingles
reptilectrikcr 1 year ago
if he says 'okay' one more time..............
saantinoo 1 year ago
open with a joke :)
CeBePuH 1 year ago
Comment removed
sodaslacks 1 year ago
Misleading title. He didn't even use the word "holographic" once in this whole lecture, and so I'm left about as confused as before I watched it. Entropy = surface area, or something. Okay, I'll take your word for it, I guess...
sodaslacks 1 year ago
@sodaslacks The property that information in a given 3-dimensional space can be encoded on a 2-dimensional surface is holographic. Many conventional holograms consist of information encoded on a 2-dimensional surface, which, when illuminated properly, produces a 3-dimensional image.
maplebayou1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@maplebayou1
I understood that much, although your explanation did make it a bit clearer. My point is, for an "introduction" to holographics this lecture wasn't very educational. If I didn't already have an idea of how holographics work, I'd probably be even more confused. I would've saved an hour of my life if he had just explained it the way you did, instead of forcing us to infer the point.
sodaslacks 1 year ago
@maplebayou1
I understood that much. It's just that, as a layman "introduction" to holographics, this wasn't very educational. I can only imagine how confused I would be if I didn't already have a minimal understanding of holographics to begin with. He took too long to explain the main point, and didn't attempt to relate it to the title subject. It's interesting, sure, but wasn't made relevant.
sodaslacks 1 year ago
we exsist in holographic game............. find out , its great fun
plantseeds121 1 year ago 3
come on guys. it's a load of crap. which is easier to believe? scientists don't understand black holes 100% or we flat creatures living in a 2D world?
Huy805 1 year ago
I didn't catch that he was suggesting that the information was written on the event horizon. I think the point is that the entropy (equals information capacity) of a black hole is no larger than the surface area of the event horizon in Planck area units.
maplebayou1 1 year ago
@maplebayou1
you're right, thank you
Davidlnb 1 year ago
Hmm.. how can the information content of a black hole be "written" on this membrane? It's not even a physically existant membrane, is it?
Davidlnb 1 year ago
NEXT TIME BUDDY,, DO ME A FAVOR,,, SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSTTTTTTAAAAAAYYYYYYYY STTTTTILLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL!!!!!!!!!!! YOU ,OVE TO MUCH FORWARDS AND BACKWARDS,, U TRY TO GET EVERYONEDIZZY??? GEEZZZ..
DCIK 1 year ago
@DCIK
you read my thought.
jetlagsyndrome 1 year ago
We are already inside a black hole.
All the matter in our universe has been consumed by a black hole at some point back in time, and also since light cannot escape the membrane of this universe in which we experience.
Inside a blackhole in our universe is another universe.
hipstarchild 1 year ago
@hipstarchild Very interesting. Do you have any information you want to share to back it up? Funny as I was watching the video I started having a strong sense that we were already inside the black hole. Recursive embedded universes? Very interesting.
chosop25 1 year ago
The readings of the characters are meadow and child.
psmtheman 1 year ago
how the hell do u get a 50 minute video on youtube.... wtf...
domino602 1 year ago
Fascinating! Interesting!
But is it useful?
azzy314159 1 year ago
@azzy314159 Not ... yet.
MrMZaccone 1 year ago
ahahaha the word means Atom ahahaha
AlexADHD 1 year ago
@AlexADHD lol u got it write >.<
RamzGT 1 year ago
A few questions ...
(1) How small can a black hole be ? (limits?) ...
(2) How large of a sphere of ~U235 would be required to create a "smallest" black hole?
(3) How does this "initial/terrestrial" mass-density relate to energy required for collapse?
(4) Once this tiniest hole is created, can it be "un-done"?
(5) If a micro-hole cannot be un-done, can the permanent gravitational attraction be "harnessed"? ... How does this "leverage" compare to permanent magnets?
(6) Mobility? Spin?
phrankus2009 1 year ago
@phrankus2009 I don't have all of your answers, but a Planck-mass black hole would evaporate immediately. The Planck mass is believed to be about 20 micrograms. This is effectively the minimum mass for a black hole.
maplebayou1 1 year ago
Some "effective" academics are great because thaey are effective abstract theorists ... Others are great (academically) because they are great communicators. Raphael? ... You are clearly both, and very charismatic and engaging, "to boot". I love the way you managed the scope of this lecture ... I am truly entriched !
= Thank You, Kind Sir =
phrankus2009 1 year ago
the universe is explosion proof so it makes sense to use holograms to fight it.
num9090 1 year ago
Theoretical physics does not tell us anything about reality, it merely exposes the paradoxial nature of the premises and flawed assumptions and on which it's based
August1977 1 year ago
If were a hologram why would we know were a hologram?
PerkiReport 1 year ago
Perhaps we are all a simulation of a far more advanced post-human civilization trying to recreate film of their own progress.
FeelOfFriction 1 year ago 2
yeah everyone has to cum and see this
very fasscinating !
^^
hackie77 1 year ago
String theory is not theory, because it have not been tested at the proper scales. I call it String Metaphysics ( I absolutely do not mean New Age Metaphysics which is a pseudoscience with no scientific basis). I have not read anyone's professional paper showing any proof or proofs that the String theory does exist. Mathematical rigors do not make a theory.
margheritazevecke 1 year ago
@margheritazevecke they barely have mathematical rigor
grimalpalooza 1 year ago
@margheritazevecke I agree completely. It should be noted that String Theory is not a really promising field. Why? Because it's computational, not componential. There is more than a subtle difference. It's bullshit. A "flowery" way of expressing dimensional abstracts. String Theory is metaphysics not so cleverly disguised by impatient physicists who simply lack the intellectual capacity to mindfully deconstruct the finite. I would go so far as to say it is pseudo-science.
NathanaelSaintCyr 1 year ago
@NathanaelSaintCyr Nah. It's only pseudo science because the scope of what it is trying to tie together is beyond our current comprehension. The truth of what we are, and what we live in,and the dimensions of it all might be eventually able to be understood by science...but there is no way you could deconstruct it into finite terms. Scientists try, but understand so little. Besides, most of the most brilliant scientists in our time were somewhat interested in 'metaphysics.'
cloud0123 1 year ago
I bet Christians listen to this and see Satan at work.
EuroPowa 1 year ago
@EuroPowa Christians think everything is Satan save very few things. Little do they know they got it totally backwards.
cloud0123 1 year ago
@EuroPowa Quite the contrary. I see God as the holographic artist who has embedded aspects of himself into this hologram.
supobostarman 9 months ago
@EuroPowa, they actually see god at work. There is no way I can describe to you how in 500 charecters but the bible has been teaching this for millenia now. The simplest way I can say it here is as above so below. The whole universe is fractal. becasue the universe is fractal the more we try to learn about our place in the universe they more we learn we have no place. this may seem incoherant and wierd but trust me its all in the bible. You just have to believe to see and if you dont you won
chogunassassin 8 months ago
Perhaps a stupid question, but when talking about surface area of a black hole, is he treating the surface area of the event horizon and the surface area of the collapsed matter itself as if they were one in the same?
LongToothEddie 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In Chinese, 原子 [yuán zǐ ] literally mean the "original" "basic" "elementary" particle.
MINGWEITSENG 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In Chinese, 原子 [yuán zǐ ] literally mean the "original" "basic" "elementary" particle.
MINGWEITSENG 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In Chinese, 原子 [yuán zǐ ] literally mean the "original" "basic" "elementary" particle.
MINGWEITSENG 1 year ago
原子 yuán zǐ
atom
Kawagi1 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@Kawagi1
原子 yuán zǐ
atom
in Chinese, literally means the "original" "basic" particle.
MINGWEITSENG 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Kawagi1
In Chinese, 原子 [yuán zǐ ] literally mean the "original" "basic" "elementary" particle.
MINGWEITSENG 1 year ago
What would the formula be for figuring the amount of wear to the soles of his shoes occuring during this presentation?
1959seeburg222 1 year ago 2
LOL! He's nervous. Maybe if the camera zoomed out a bit it would be ok.
HungDGunn 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
not interesting.
stupid at its best
animesuckass 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@animesuckass
"What if life was truly all a dream... one long tedious good dream?"
Then you should row your boat.
MomoTheBellyDancer 1 year ago
Damn son!!! you be all fuckin' wit holograms and shit!!!! What if life was truly all a dream... one long tedious good dream?
xgilxx 1 year ago
STAND STILL!!!!
batmmannn 1 year ago
Very interesting ! Thanks for posting.
etiennealive 1 year ago
The most informative and enlightening public access introduction to the holographic principle I've been able to find. If only documentaries on the so called learning stations would air material with this much substance. Thankyou!
Teufel916 1 year ago 2
He's smart, but he won't quit moving and now I'm sea sick.
qYnBzWFc 1 year ago
@qYnBzWFc It seems he is meditating while talking, almost like an improvising singer.
AkiraBergman 1 year ago
@AkiraBergman Whatever he is doing is not effective in this medium.
qYnBzWFc 1 year ago
@qYnBzWFc His rare talent more than makes up for it. Get over it. Concentrate on the substance.
AkiraBergman 1 year ago
@AkiraBergman It's a shame that you seem to be allergic to constructive criticism. Hope that works well for you.
qYnBzWFc 1 year ago
Thank you for your excellent presentation on the holographic principle~ my husband, dr kitty and i are fascinated by black holes, string theory(ies) etc.. I'm trying to explain these theories to my family in NY:) your video is perfect~!
kittywaymo 1 year ago
stumbled from your mum
ErickJamesBuckwalter 1 year ago
maybe it is that light is reflected back, not that it cant escape
medisynergi 1 year ago
原子 (genshi) means "atom" in Japanese!
jlke45 1 year ago
Excellent talk - I'm new to this holographic principle thing, this made a lot of things very clear for me.
Not sure what he's getting at from 52:00 to 54:00 though... I'm guessing that he's saying that it doesn't seem to be possible to imagine a physical observer consistent with general relativity who could measure a loss of information or a decrease in entropy, which suggests even more strongly that this principle is remarkably solid. If so, then I'm happy to take his word for it. :)
TheBobathon 1 year ago
Thank Buddha I already know this stuff. I had to turn off the lecture after 3 minutes because I simply cannot abide by his saying "ok" after every 3rd syllable.
BartelDoo 1 year ago
@BartelDoo Ah, I see Buddha has endowed you with great patience, receptivity and humility :)
TheBobathon 1 year ago 2
not happy with the cuts. whoever cut this lecture i wanna holler at you. mssg me
ballhardent 1 year ago
next time film the overheads and not the presenter when given the choice. Hearing him is the important thing. Not seeing the overheads clearly and instead seeing his constantly moving frame is very off putting.
retrogradeorbit 1 year ago 2
This still doesn't tell me how Trey holds a note for 5 minutes???
You got PT'd bitch!
lombado22 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Time, space and gravity are illusions. The universe is continually created and resolving it doesnt expand into something, theres no edge, no "size" Entangle entities occupy same space. Not so entangled entities appearing separate to observers. As matter resolves, the illusion of space collapses between them as observed as gravitational attraction and motion as wave functions presses to in-phase becoming one. Cosmic red shift is illusion of matter shrinking not an expanding universe.
spacedecoy 2 years ago
fascinating!
tuur61 2 years ago 11
so the plank length is just a density. kind like the amount of energy in an area before a blackhole is made?
keggerous 2 years ago
there is an infinate amount of density at the plancks length
MidnightDC696969 2 years ago
@keggerous yup
GratefuLSD 2 years ago
very very interesting!
ierogamos 2 years ago 14
:^)
1nessism 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The author Alexander Lowen reminds us that Freud as a jew has developed a fatalist view of life hence his Edipo's psychiatric metaphor. This is about we cannot avoid our fate. Lowen says that by accepting our fate we can at least make it less tragic. So, maybe the constrain imposed by Godel's Theorem may prove to be fundamenal to do teleportation!
mrqsilveira 2 years ago
(46:20) "...Somehow the world is not as local as we might thought it was!"
We started to perceive that the world was not that local since Einstein-Rosen-Poldosky in the 30's I think...
BUT THIS NEW PERSPECTIVE IS REALLY BEAUTIFUL!!
UAU! UAU!! UAU!!!
mrqsilveira 2 years ago
What a darwinian selected mutation could ever have got to do with specifying the state configuration space of a certain environment?
mrqsilveira 2 years ago
Would it by necessity have a relationship between Boussos's desire to get an accout of the information content of the room he is in and the information his mind is absorbing through his several senses from the near environment?
mrqsilveira 2 years ago