Added: 5 years ago
From: ogonzilla
Views: 2,159,522
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (844)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • lance's personality isnt that amazing to me and i do agree he has been questionable with drugs or whatever but jesus, any video with him in it is so fucking exciting. like these tours, with ullrich and postal, they are golden, i love it

  • ACID :)

  • Resistência,força ,concentração strong strong strong.fabulous

  • LOL...Look at the idiots crying about EPO. All your favorite cyclists use it.  Lance simply is better than them. Stop crying. It's not his fault you weren't born American.

  • LOLOLOLOLOL HAHAHAHHAA U GOT CANCER LANCE MORE LIKE LANCE BALLZWEAK.....FUCKIN LOSER I HOPE U DIE ALRDY!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Alpe D'Huez D' EPO

  • U368: if you dont have prouve dont accuse ....the doping is not the essentiel if you take the dopping im not sure you climb like lance

  • @samaniak1 exatamente !

  • A great doper like Riis or Virenque.

  • Amazing what can be done with EPO!

    In 19931-996, mountains were too big for him... like it was for Riis without EPO

  • @hghepo Lance wasn't a climber in those years, he was to heavy. He lost some weight when he had cancer and by training for the mountains some riders completely changes, just look at Jalabert and Wiggins.

  • @HEMSEDALII BS... Lance had around the same weight at all his TDF, he was even a bit heavier after 2001 !

    To explain his 25% of climb increase he should have lost 25% of his initial weight, do you math boy!

    Jalabert was first a very good climber before focusing on one day race, then he goes back to climb after his crash while sprinting.

  • why were they wearing no helmets??

  • @96Boaz because back in 2001, cyclists had the choice to whether wear helmets or not. But since 2003 and the death of Andrei Kivilev, UCI decided that every pro cyclist must wear an helmet.

  • This is such a good clip and very well done on the editing/soundtrack. Is that Vino no 7? He looks massive. Almost Ulrich proportions. Big Booty.

  • @kaaspar: 0:55 - 1:05.

    JB: "you can't". LA: "huh?" JB: "You can not. 3 meters of snow. The guys says there is no way you can ride. No way" LA: "Who says that?"

  • Can someone translate 0:55-1:05 ?

  • 131 people just got dropped by Lance and their booty is DEAD!

  • This man is a MACHINE!!!

  • My Chalet near Alpe D'Huez is for sale. Anyone?

  • Oh the good old days of US postal..

  • Lance Armstrong 2001, and its now nearly 2012 and yet they still can't pin a drug charge on him, and with scientific developements it would of been done by now!

  • @interactivecard

    You have missed a lot of facts like EPO found in his 1999 samples, that was dropped by UCI because of statute limitations. During SCA affair, there 3 legal testimonies specifying that Lance confessed doping or had say he doped. Many times, his team had been caught with doping material like perfusion kit, actovegin and so... We are still waiting for a scientific explanation about his hematocrit level, the only technic known is blood doping to obtain such values.

  • @u368 So i take it thats a no then, your still waiting for proof, and then they will strip him of his 7 titles. Lance is a legend

  • @interactivecard Sure Lance is a doping legen, that is currently under investigation for : drug trafficking, money laundering, corruption, corruption of foreign entities, witness tampering and more linked to health rules violation...

    Not bad for a "clean" and "innocent" athlete who has already $3M paid his lawyer.

  • Never watched the tour before 2001... but at that moment when Lance turns around, looks Ulrich in the eye... glares at him... senses his fatigue.. and then returns to his front and pours on the gas.... is one of the great moments in sports history. ..  At that moment I sensed just how good this guy was, and he has gone on to confirm that he may be the best athlete, in any sport who ever lived. Seriously, this guy is amazing.

  • @u368 Go away, please.

  • @u368 Your comment seems to suggest that the only thing that a person needs to be the best at his sport is to dope. Don't you think that's a little simplistic?

  • @cyclingfan55 That is as simple as EPO found in 6 + 2 samples, as many doping affairs, as to have Dr. Ferrari as doctor, as many legal testimonies pointing doping, and of course a very strange transformation from a flatland riders to a climber... don't forget the average recovering abilities of Lance mentionned by scientists after intense testing for 1996 JO.

    There is no doubt he is a big doper, he was never seen as a GT contender before he drunk Ferrari's potion.

  • Get busy living or get busy dying-The Shawshank Redemption

  • thumbs up for track and cycling football soccer exc are gay

  • Live Strong King of all MOUNTAIN KINGS,and than than some.

  • Black and white when it comes to sport as far as I am concerned. Just ask the Pakistani cricketers who are now in the slammer . You seem to at best be making excuses at best and at worst sitting on the fence . Shame . The Tour De France is one of the best sporting events on the planet but it is tainted because of it's rife doping history .It can only get better. .

  • @thehitchrules Cycling is great BECAUSE of its history - Coppi and Bartali, Anquetil and Poulidor, Merckx and Gimondi/De Vlaeminck, Armstrong and Ullrich. Doping did not create these rivalries, it was simply part of the sport and didn't denigrate it in any way. The problem is that you've been spoon-fed this chilvalric ethic of right and wrong that 's so sanctimonious and out of touch with reality you might as well be in Lalaland. What's next, no premarital sex? No hats inside? Queuing?

  • Didn't denigrate it in anyway ? !! Absolutely priceless !! Try telling that to Pantani's family of other riders who have been exposed for doping . Your comments are absurd .

  • @thehitchrules Is that a poor attempt at logical fallicy, becuase you just changed the premise of your argument? I agree with the negative health effects of doping, but, our quarrel was if Lance Armstrong, and further extrapolated, the history of cycling (or at least the names I've listed below), is a sham becauase of doping in the sport. Let's try to keep it on a straight line buddy.

  • @nolmeister1 And your last post doesn't make sense. Further extrapolated? What the hell does that mean ? ! Explain? . If you want to make the point that cyclists have always doped just make it . I am saying that doping in all sports undermines integrity/purity of that particular sport . It doesn't matter if it's been going on since the beginning of time as seems to be the case with elite cycling . The sanctimony lies with you I'm afraid.

  • I can see the track marks on Lance's arms.

  • I just love it when he looks behind and sees them tired, pained faces, stands up, then smashes the life out of the peddles! LIVESTRONG

  • hghepo is a pedophile!

  • "You can't! You cannot!" (Coach says to Lance-referring to the 3 feet of snow up ahead which will prevent Lance from his trek up the mountain on this cold day).

    Lance's look is priceless! It's like he is saying to him "F*** that! Just watch me man!"

    In his auto-biograpghy, "It's not about the Bike", Lance said,

    "I knew that if I was to win the Tour De France, I had to ride where no others riders would go." Damn straight! RESPECT to you ! An inspiration for all!

  • he's just a terminator

    nothing to say more

    dope video

  • if this dont get ya booty moving, ya booty must be dead!

  • Live Strong is the Best STRONGEST CLIMBER of all.Once the LOOK KICKS IN,HE'S GONE. We Live 2 Ride,Ride 2 Live.

  • i watch this before i fuck my girlfriend to get pumped up

  • This is so cool. haha, I love that dessed up devil at the start, chasing him

  • doooooooooooope video!

  • Thumbs up if you think cycling is the worlds greatest, toughest and most demanding sport

  • @DB21DonamonDynamos cycling is technically more time-consuming but rowing is tougher in my opinion

  • @DB21DonamonDynamos swimming is....

  • @vasgeorge no way, I was a national swimmer for 5years and gave it up for cycling. There is absolutely no denying that swimming is a very hard and intense sport, but I feel cycling is a much more demanding sport and requires more mental strength. P.S. I think 100m Butterfly is the best event in swimming, probably because it was my favourite!

  • @DB21DonamonDynamos Swimming is much more difficult cause it reguires almost everything.If you dont have good technique in swimming you get tired very fast. Running and cycling are much more easier in the technique field. These 3 sports are the best. The combination of the 3 makes very good athletes.

  • @vasgeorge very true, I had good technique so I never got tired! :P OK...Iron Man (triathlon) is the toughest sport....do we agree? :P

  • @DB21DonamonDynamos Spot on dude, how many other great sportsmen and women use cycling as part of their training. There is no other sport that beats you up like cycling. None.....!

  • @carlosdeno thank you, oddly your one of the few people to agree with me!

  • @DB21DonamonDynamos or atleast top 3

  • @DB21DonamonDynamos

    of course it is :-)

  • @DB21DonamonDynamos You forgot to mention the word epic

  • @DB21DonamonDynamos YEAAAAAAAAAH I AGREEEEEE

  • this video always gets me so pumped.

  • So brilliant.

  • The Look... what an ass.

  • @whaaaaateverful BS. The so-called "Look" is media inspired nonsense. The first thing Armstrong is looking at is his domestique, Rubeldia, or whatever Spanish climber that is. Seeing his guy is fried, he looks back at the remaining riders. He sees Ulrich is isolated and alone, and he sees only another rider or two, struggling greatly. Then he decides to go. There's nothing untoward or disrespectful there. He's just trying to assess the situation.

  • @ClockCutter Ok, just reviewed it - you could in fact be right. I wouldn't be surprised if it was a media creation. He was still an ass when he competed. Brilliant, but an ass.

  • @ClockCutter

    have you never done that ?

    I have, you "look",my mind says "come on then" , then you go...

    Its an invitation, if someone does it to me, then i go , how long is another matter?

    as you say, nothing disrespectful, if anything its just being competitive, its in our blood :-)

    Love it,love cycling,

  • Drugs or not--I just don't care--Lance Armstrong was simply magnificent.

  • @ClockCutter yeah, brilliant like Marion Jones! great role model for children, do drugs you"ll win!!!

  • @dan32113 Sigh. Boring. Childish. Even those near LA who've called him out for drug usei.e., Frankie Andrieu, tell the following story. US Postal goes to Europe in 1998, and they're just getting slaughtered. Everyone else is doping. The year or two before, when most of them were riding for Motorola, they could hang. But in 98, they were getting crushed. Their opinion was that in 98, just about everyone was doping EPO. So, what do you do in that position? Worry about being a role model? No.

  • @ClockCutter Sigh. Boring. Childish. are you talking about yourself. You WILL look stupid when the Feds nail his ass, its coming!!!

  • @dan32113 I don't see how I'll look foolish if he gets busted. I've never claimed he didn't dope. I think it's highly likely he did, at least from 99 to 03. What are you on about? My claim was just this, in essence. In sports where (most, nearly) everyone is doing drugs, and it's the only way you can compete at the highest level, it's silly to suppose these athletes should "role models" for children and to hate them because they are not. 

  • @ClockCutter You're an idiot .

  • @thehitchrules Heh. Nice. I take it you are incapable of making any kind of case against anything I've said. Some of your remarks below do indicate a lack of candlepower.

  • @ClockCutter Maybe because your argument (if that's what you can call it ) is a baseless shitty one .I doubt , based on your frankly ridiculous posts that you have the intellect to debate with me . Just the way it is . You keep asserting that drugs is the only way to compete at the highest level- great argument !!

  • @thehitchrules I don't recall offering any argument. What posts are ridiculous? I've never asserted that drugs are the only way to compete at the highest level. So, it's hard to see what you are on about. And, frankly, I don't think you can read very well. Further, the assertion that drugs are the only way to compete at the highest level, if I had asserted that, which I have not, would not be an *argument*. It would be a claim. Clear your head, man.

  • @ClockCutter Priceless !

  • @thehitchrules Yes. If only that were some kind of refutation, everyone would be a genius.

  • idolo de idolos!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • great video!

    Doping or not, this clip makes you want to be just a little bit better rider, push a little bit harder, dig a little deeper, carve out the superman within yourself..

    Stop yakking and get on your bike!!!

  • It doesn´t matter this or that, a guy like Lance Armstrong is on his bike while we are "discussing", while watching a video. He deserves what he get.

  • its so easy to get acid you can get it anywhere

  • you know something armstrong is a one of legendary cyclists in history ; want it or not ; franch people hit him because he was beat all fucking french cyclists like jalabert; remember that from 1999 to 2005 was the most watched period of tour de france and was the most incredible remember those days when armstrong;ullrich;beloki; vinokourov; bayo; and so many others....can you find it now..of course not viva armstrong

  • HE WAS THE BEST and you know why? Because he had a cancer and he fought against it! Even if he doped you should aprecciate him just by what I said before! I hope you never have to know what that is!

  • @96DamageInc the fatal flaw in your argument is Armstrong sold his image on a lie, doping was a big part of his success, don"t the people he"s conned have a right to the truth..

  • @96DamageInc You are so wrong. Any illegality within sport such as bribes and particularly doping COMPLETELY UNDERMINES the INTEGRITY of sport. It is ridiculous to suggest otherwise. Pantani, Armstrong, Marion Jones, Ben Johnson, John Higgins ALL undermine their respective sport's integrity . You are blinded by Armstrongs reputation and publicity.aAying things like EVEN if he doped. Thit is the bottom line: If you dope you are not the best . END of .

  • @thehitchrules integrity john higgins? he was the front page of the notw! you think news international should conduct drug testing. i know you do. i hacked your voicemail.

  • @bipedalame Try reading my post properly you dick .

  • @thehitchrules This is a naive argument. The peloton up till ~2008 was at its foundation doped (of Top 10 at Tour in 2005, all but Evans have been linked). It's nothing new, Coppi and Anquetil admitted this. You can't judge a person outside of their circumstance. Take a person who deducts personal expenses to their biz, it's not legal, but it's part of being a biz owner. It's not as if the argument is that Armstrong is the sole doper, it's the reverse. Worse case, his playing field = others.

  • @nolmeister1 Armstrong has 'sold ' not only his image but his success as a lie . History judges Lance kindly at present but trust me if dope-free riders of the future demonstrate dominance by pure athleticism , talent Lance's integrity will be shown up for what it is - a sham He will known as the best of the dopers .I suggest the naivety lies in your argument when you conclude you can't judge people outside their circumstances . I think you'll find me and millions of others have .

  • @thehitchrules I'm 100% in favor of clean cycling now and in the future, but to confirm, do you consider all these past cyclists linked to doping as shams? Merckx, Coppi, Anquetil, Gaul, Simpson, Moser, Thevenet, Zoetemelk, Maertens, Delgado, Fignon, Yates, Kelly, Chiappucci, Roche, Pantani, Ullrich, Leipheimer, Zabel, Riis, Zulle, Virenque, Garzelli, Museeuw, Heras, Basso, Rasmussen, Petacchi, Contador, Valverde, Rebellin, etc.

  • @thehitchrules Yeah, of course. Show me a doper/briber who says he doesn't do it and I sat they have zero integrity . You ?

  • @thehitchrules As for integrity, I agree, but it's a catch-22; a cyclist can't admit he dopes lest he serves a suspension. There's nothing to lose if you admit after a suspension, but for those not caught, they'll lose two years of their livelihood. That's why the sport for so long was based on omerta (i.e. code of silence). That's the reason I mentioned circumstance before. It's too easy to point your finger and play God outside the box. Life is black and white in principle, not reality.

  • @96DamageInc he will never used dope he is just the best of whole the world and he was already biking when he had chemo's i got so much respect for him

  • @lau2justinchristian David Millar was 2003 World time trial Champion, he never tested positive! But he admitted later that he took EPO. Officers raided his home & found empty vials of EPO. This proves you can take drugs without getting caught! Millar rode the Worlds but didn"t fail drugs test..

  • @dan32113 Yeah but lance armstrong was the most tested athletes of all time passing 500 drug test's! People like you never go anywhere because they are the people that don't believe in people being able to do what seems impossible and will always doubt and make excuses like he took drugs

  • @kornrocks1994 read the book Breaking the chain by Willy Voet who was impicated in the Festina Affair, in it he explains how to piss clean. Marion Jones won Oympic Golds on drugs, but never failed a test, how do you explain that...

  • @kornrocks1994 Lance was never tested 500 times, he was less than 100 times tested for 1993-2005 period!

    Check your facts before repeating lies of Lance. You can go on USADA website and check how many he was tested and compare with Kristin Armstrong or other athletes.

    BTW EPO was found in his 1999 TDF samples in 2005, EPO test didn't exist before 2000!

  • i like your name...  but there is NO way to test for EPO in old samples, you're a fool of a took. to test for EPO, you check the blood's hematocrit ratio. it's the ratio of RBC to Plasma. many organic compounds would have decomposed over the 7 year period, unless it were frozen. even if that is the case, you said the found EPO which is about the dumbest shit anybody could say...

  • @PATAR144 Clearly you know few about doping tests. Samples are frozen, especially B samples which would be used only in case of a positive, so probably months after.

    When the resulys were published, some scientists like Dr Ayotte, Montreal lab, were surprised, they believed that EPO would have been destroyed after a such laps. Finally they have agreed with the findings.

    So yes Lance used EPO in 1999 as 8 of his samples show it.

  • @hghepo Clearly i see you are still bitching about Armstrong. lol. going on three years now?

  • @TheRelentlessRT You are still there after 4 years and despite all evidences pointing the cheating of your hero !

    I am working my english skill there and you? Are you working your fooling and lies skills?

  • @hghepo Clearly you know nothing about WADA, UCI or the rules of any other legitimate sports authority. The ENTIRE reason such orgs have time limitations for such tests is that leaving someones samples in a lab for years would obviously subject such samples to fraud, being switched, foreign substances being introduced. this is EXACTLY why orgs such as WADA and the UCI pay no merit to "supposed" test results from any lab years and years after samples have been taken. IT PROVES NOTHING, LOL

  • @ghostzapper2006 Thanks for making us laugh.

    As chief of WADA, Dick Pound asked UCI to prosecute Armstrong after "The Armstrong"s lie" was printed. Then UC, accomplice of Armstrong tried to descredit LNDD with the Vrijman reports qualified later by WADA as farcical.

    Do your homework, search engines are usefull by those days.

  • Just the BOSS!!!

  • @JuanDeEnzina Bruce Springsteen!

  • Comment removed

  • dan32112....a convicted liar and cheat 'said' lance and johan met martial to discuss epo....lance denied and martial admitted,what you have left out...was tyler 'there' when said conversation took place NO!...so a man who was never there knows exactly what was said 'i dont think so'!....

  • @OHNGAI its funny how Armstrong"s attorney said Lance has no memory of meeting Martial Saugy. Really so you didn"t discuss EPO, which Saugy admits to? Lance wasn"t in switzerland is was a hologram. LOL..

  • @dan32113 wake up from your dream,all you do is talk dribble,now go and wipe your chin!

  • @OHNGAI Lance is that you baby! The feds are on your ass boy...

  • @dan32113 you just prooved my point ..retard!

  • @OHNGAI prooved? do you mean proved. you turd. Your typing skills need an EPO boost, just like your hero takes, Lance Drugstrong.

  • @dan32113 resorting to attacking my spelling insted of providing facts of lances non-negative drug tests,thats right he has never provided a non-negative drug test,just like you who has never provided any FACTS..turd!

    Go wipe your chin your boyfreind left a bit of a mess there!

  • @OHNGAI boyfriend? fuck you are an idiot, you have enough man love for Lancey Armstrong to start your own Gay parade. You probably go to bed with a poster of your favourite EPO drugs cheat...

  • DOPE

  • And you can win too if you're allowed to dope by the UCI if they choose you to become a poster-child to increase the sport's popularity!!!

  • LanceLied(dot)com. WIn Wrong, Cheat Long, Dope Strong, Arm Prong!

  • cont:

    5--A samples were destroyed by the LAB!

    6--A samples COULD NOT show a POSITIVE and NO longer exists!

    7--every existing regulation is clear Lance is NOT 'offically or legally' POSITIVE!

    8--Post 2001 A samples have NEVER shown evidence of EPO!

    .....what this affirms is that LANCE ARMSTRONG has NEVER FAILED a test acording to all regulations...and that the 1999 test would never stand as evidence in a court of law as PROTOCOL WAS AND HAS NEVER been followed...

    info came from HGHEPO!

  • to all you idiots who take things out of context for their own arguements here are facts

    1--1999 testing code [wada--pre-wada] requires urine to be split into A and B samples who sighns and seals them.

    2--ONLY-if A sample reads [non-negative] is B sample tested.

    3--ONLY-if both A and B come back [non-negative] is it announced as a POSITIVE test

    4--the rider has the right to be present at the testing of the B sample to affirm it is his and has not been tamperd with.

    to be cont:

  • I, like many here, agree that Lance Armstrong was a great rider. But seriously, look at the way he rode up Alpe D'Huez here... high work rate out of the saddle for extended periods at grade and then to the line. He would have made Evans, Schlecks and Contodor look ordinary this year. Contodor's form from previous years might have matched him.. but that too is suspect now eh? It's not unreasonable to suspect he was on some juice.. shit, how many of his peers and advisors have now been exposed?

  • @TheMarcnicholas he was obviously riding below his lactic threshold until 3-5 km's from the finish then goes past his threshold for the entire attack to the finish..its risky because you can 'bonk' and run out of gas, but timed right its very effective at demorilising your opponents both mentaly and phisicaly...i have seen it and have used same tatic in racing,when it works great but when it doesnt, it hurts and you loose time..you have to know your thresholds..like time trialing

  • one word ' KING'

  • the only guy that can ride in three feet of snow is Chuck Norris

  • Armstrong fails to finish 3 out of the first 4 Tours he rides in 93/94/96. The one Tour he complete"s finishes 36th place in 95, he then has cancer that nearly kills him. Then comes 1st in 99/00/01/02/03/04/05 how?= EPO...

  • @dan32113 Perhaps it was the weight he dropped during his cancer battle? Maybe a new understanding of how far he can push himself? Seems harsh to blame one of the greatest champions of any sport of all time with unfounded drug allegations.......

  • @0439912059 you say unfounded!, but Lance"s own Soigneur Emma O"Reilly said he took EPO. Former temmates Landis, Hamilton & Frankie Andreau say exactly the same. UCI donations worth hundreds of thousands of pounds made by Lance. EPO was found in his 1999 Tour de France samples when tested retropsectively in i believe 04. Also why are the Feds on his ass, if they don"t feel there is a case?

  • @dan32113 IT was not a retrospective test!....It was done for research purposes..once again getting your facts wrong like that dickhead hghepo!

  • @OHNGAI Tyler Hamilton said Armstrong/Bruyneel met Swiss Lab director Martial Saugy to discuss EPO. Armstrong denied this! But Saugy said YES  he did meet Armstrong to discuss how testing for EPO worked. Why would a rider that was clean? want to know how EPO detection worked! Answer that then, Einstein... Armstrong is a born liar! FACT

  • @lleosupercluster Please don't speak of IQ, that is something totaly unknown of you.

    Why should you have to compare Merckx era and EPO era where big ass were able to climb mountains like mountain goats, thanks to EPO.

    When Lance won his fisrt TDF stage ont the flat, he was so tired that he had to leave TDF 2 days later, because of his lack of recovering ability, he was not build for stage races, EPO made Lance, without blood doping he would never have finished a single TDF in top 30 !

  • @hellsadore IQ? Check your spelling and grammar. Lance has never tested positive to performance enhancing drugs. I believe you are either suffering from "Tall poppy syndrome", or are just a sad and pathetic human being.

  • @0439912059 Please what is the link between IQ and ability to write a non-native language?

    I agree with you , Lance never tested positive, EPO was just found in 8 of his 1999 TDF samples, is-it doping ? Corticosteroid were found too, Lance had said he had no TUE then his positive test was cleared by a back-dated TUE. Could it be a sign of UCI corruption especially when we know now that Lance gave secretly huge amount of money to UCI?

    Thanks for your answers.

    

  • @0439912059 No positive for Lance , just EPO found in his samples, actovegin, links with Ferrari, a lot of legal testimonies, and currently an ongoing federal inv estigation about drugs trafficking and corruption..

  • @hellsadore according to all rules and regulations lance has NEVER failed or tested 'non-negative' to any test set out by the UCI or WADA..As or your 'legal' testimonies, 3 of them are from convicted liars and cheats 'no-credibility

    just like ..hghepo..musicNsoccer..dan321­13..and yourself!!!!

    EPO FOREVER FOREVER LOADED...yeah baby groovey !!!!!

  • @OHNGAI Don't call me baby, stupid boy.

    World would be better for you if you were able to handle truth. You can try to flee, to hide and to deny it, Lance's doping is as certain as Earth is not flat.

    Time to growth, baby.

  • @hellsadore BABY,CRY,BABY BITCH!

  • @disneystars2017

    my personal fav is Onzee Abridged episode 1

  • contadors better

  • def doped up but whooo cares this is fucking awesome!

  • i reckon their doing all these tests because it's so amazing how 1 man was able to win 7 tours in a row

  • NO amount of dope will give you even ONE ounce of the "will to win".

    Armstrong's "will to win" is the greatest the sport has ever seen.

  • @HotChixAndMusic Armstrong greater than Merckx? rubbish. Fellow american Greg Lemond had more talent than Armstrong, his 1989 time trial ride at average speed over 54km/h is STILL the fastest ride ever in the history of the Tour! Greg Lemond rode clean. Armstrong was taught by Dr Ferrari aka the blood doctor! FACT

  • @lleosupercluster Merckx is the greatest riders, 2nd is Hinault, 3rd Coppi...

    None of this guys are seen to be a Riis like Armstrong.

    Your Armstrong was full of EPO in 1999 when other riders were "almost clean", they did'nt refuel during that TDF ! Armstrong reopened the use of EPO despite the secret arrangement made between riders.

  • dan32113 just a big mouth arm chair know-all...the truth will set you free....because you watch tv doesnt mean you know the truth,only lance knows the truth,the only thing you know is the sound of your own voice !

  • @lleosupercluster if i want to acknowlegde that Armstrong is a FRAUD, i will! What are you the youtube taliban??? free speech but only if you agree with it! The truth is the truth, nothing more nothing less. Armstrong = EPO (BLOOD DOPING)

  • @lleosupercluster Please explain us why Ben Jonhnson and Marion Jones took drugs? Do you believe that is because to run 100m is too hard? Or it was to win and beat their fellow athletes?

    Do you know that there is a lot of riders that are doing the same trip as TDF everywhere... slower but they do the same stages, so that is not impossible if done slower!

    Stop to believe the dopers who have a big interest to justify their cheating and lies.

  • @lleosupercluster man, Hinault never failed a test, nor Anquetil ! It's idiot to compare those 2 eras.

    BTW since 1998, doping was outlawed in France, and a rider like Bassons was a strong opponent to doping and was directly threatened by Armstrong.

  • all nayesayers that have posted on this site have failed at their respective sports and as such blamed those who were supperior to be on drugs!the BIG difference between lance and the nayesayers is that lance wont belittle you for your failures like you try to belittle his success.....wheres the damnation of CONTADOR he actually failed a test unlike lance who failed none!.....a win is a win and nayesayers will always loose!

  • @OHNGAI You are a liar like rmstrong who failed a test in 1999. He had sais he had no TUE on that TDF, no TUE was on his doping form then when his positive test was out, magically a TUE existed. But O'Reilly, Lance's masseuse did a testimony that confirms that was a fake TUE.

    BTW what about his 6+2 EPO samples of his 1999 TDF?

  • @hghepo if your allegation are correct and not just bullshit from lance lied .com then why hasnt he been banned or suspended,no one is above the law

  • @OHNGAI How many times did you break the law? How many times did you get a speed ticket? Did you never make an arrangement to avoid a fine or a punishment?

    Why did Lance gave around $200.000 to UCI ($5000.000 according Sylvia Schenk UCI accountant)?

    Is there no corruption in that world?

    Why did UCI chief say many times that there were no doping despite all evidencesof it?

  • @hghepo Lance is clean, because these idiots believe they is no such thing as the Omerta. As you said UCI bribes, what was Armstrong doing donating hundreds of thousands? He was too powerful, former teamates admitted doping, rivals Ullrich, Riis, Pantani, & Virenque all on EPO. Fuck he even had a realationship with the Italian doctor Ferrari, who was know to be an expert in blood doping! Thats not hearsay, but admitted fact. Of course Armstrong is clean, LOL...

  • @hghepo 2 speeding tickets...never denied the offence's.....1 court appearence, for a violent assault...never denied the offence or tryed to plea a leaser charge....and served my time...whats your point!....i have donated to my countrys governingbody. nothing wrong with that!....

  • @OHNGAI The point is that you were speeding more than 2 times and you got just 2 tickets. Me I never got a speed ticket in my country, do you believe I never broke the speed limit?

    So do you believe that Lance never doped because he was "officialy" cleared at least 2 times (corticosteroid and EPO) ?

  • @hghepo PROOVE THAT I WAS SPEEDING MORE THAN TWICE!!!!! i dont care if you have never sped!!!!....he was cleared officially so fucken what...check out his expert witness he has more knowledge than you will ever have via google....dope forever forever loaded....yeah baby!!!!!!!

  • @hghepo Pantani, Zabel, Ullrich, Merckx, & other cycling greats have tested + for PED. Yet i never see assholes like you on their videos griping about cheating. The only difference is Armstrong is an asshole who cheated, & he bullied people to get away with cheating. He is no more of a cheater than Merckx, Ullrich, & Valverde. Also, its not what you "know"/think, its what you can legally prove. So fuck off w/ your hypocritical nonsense. Cycling is dirty, & Lance did not make it that way.

  • @TheRelentlessRT May you explain us what is doing Novitzky ? Oh yes he is wasting your tax money since a year on a stupid doping case with the approbabtion of his chief and other federal agencies! He was able to be helped for a so insignifiant case by Interpol and the police of 4 other countries, at least.

    Something else?

  • @hghepo Ok guy, reread that broken English 'word-salad' you just wrote. Seriously, i am not sure what you are trying to say. I know Armstrong makes you so emotional, and you are so obsessed about his life, but calm down and write comments that are actually readable.

  • Hard working in sport means doping !

    Most of the athletes give their best to be the strongest, but some use drugs to be better and a few like Armstrong were using massive doping program elaborated by Dr. Ferrari, the guy who said that EPO was not more dangerous than orange juice. Since we have learnt that too much EPO can give cancer!

  • Lance Armstrong is a great bicycle rider since when he was a kid. He trained cycling for hours everyday. He is one of the most hardworking athletes in history and you accuse him of doping??? Lol dumbasses

  • PURE DOPING !!

  • @erpituty Your point? He wasn't the only one doping in the pro peloton, but he did win the Tour 7 times. Doping or no doping, that's a f*cking great achievement.

  • watch out lance musicNsoccer is after you buddy,better have some fanta climb the alpe head over to the galibier snort some coke or better still sprite,just make sure its sugar free buddy or the naysayer's will hang you without due process!....win wrong--a win is a win...chat long--good comunication buddy...arm prong--you've done 500 tests you can do another...dope strong--dumbass musicNsoccer been smokin weed....

  • Fuck song ! 

  • How could Lance win over his competitors so many times when most of them took doping(epo etc..) ?? And you claim Lance was drug free??? Hahahaha . OHNGAI, you are such a fool! All you can say for yourself is "Give me proof" . Maybe you should open your eyes , idiot

  • @l0lz0r8 i have NEVER claimed lance was drug free !so back at you ha ha ha . what i stand for is 'innocent until PROOVEN guilty',isnt everyone entitled to that right? or should we just start persecuting people based on 'convicted liars and cheats' and also sad loosers comments to the press ?....idiot? is that the most intelligent response you can conjure up,oops 'sorry such a fool' aswell...those who live in glass house's should not throw stones!