Added: 3 years ago
From: inunomoe
Views: 20,250
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (41)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • well, that's one way to keep a watch position accurate, keep the position changing at all times.

  • I could be wrong but I believe this is a Shanghai tourbillon.

  • its a pokeball

  • @MaveHH I had to think realy long before i got that one XD

  • Hem The tourbillion is a complication because he increases the precision of the watch. With a tourbillion the watch is less sensible for the accelerations and the movements of the harm.

    Sorry but you wrong.

  • @radas666amadei - agreed, the tourbillion is usually shown off with the heart of the watch twisting and turning, how could anyone say that its not a complication?

  • @radas666amadei Unfortunately, you're quite wrong. No offence, but I think that you should find out what watchmakers mean by saying "a complication". Complication isn't everything that makes a watch more "complicated"

  • Okay, Hem "a complication isn't everything that makes a watch more complicated??" I could not agree without example. Give me just one example of a complication that doesn't complicate the watch.

  • @szybkilopez566

    Your comment being marked as spam just shows how arrogant some people are.

    "He makes perfect sense and is supported by experienced watchmakers, but he's a spammer".

    What a bunch of ignoramuses.

  • @kisetsushin Well... Some Kool-Aid boys (like radas666amadei, for example) cannot bear the shame, when it turns out, that their bold claims made them look like enlightened dorks. Whatever, I couldn't care less :-) Peace, kisetsushin!

  • @szybkilopez566 Yes!

  • Comment removed

  • "i am swiss cheese"

  • I have a lot more experience than you in high end watches if you think this is a tourbillion, no offense. You said yourself that these fetch a couple grand... A couple grand???? The cheapest (least expensive) tourbillion and a real tourbillion I may add is made by JLC and gets around $28K. These are Chinese knock offs and pieces of shit! A cool novelty for the less knowledgeable collector maybe, a good gift for a kid to play with. This is so far from a real tourbillion it is crazy.

  • You have no idea who i am or what i have experience with, just the fact that you assume you're better than someone without even knowing them in the least just proves how ignorant you really are. Do some real research.

  • You're right that the least expensive production tourbillon is available through JLC but you're amazing experience doesn't include vintage and antique pieces, not to mention the fact that the Chinese actually make genuine tourbillon starting at a couple hundred and going up to 40k.

    I bet you also knew that Jaeger LeCoultre's tourbillon is actually not made by them. I'm sure you with your wealth of experience could name who actually makes it.

  • One last thing, i'm not a collector, i'm a professional Horologist.

  • A tourbillon is not a complication because it doesn't change the time telling in any way, a complication is something that adds to the time telling or adds another feature, such as a moon phase, calender, date, repeater, etc. A tourbillon doesn't change the time telling in any way, therefore not a complication.

    I also never said you insulted my intelligence, and insult yourself by misspelling the word. You have a horrible grasp of real horology and English.

  • "Jap"? Really? That's completely racist and ignorant, i guess you've never heard of Grand Seiko's which are equal and many times much better than high end swiss chronometers since Seiko came up with basic chronometer standards which are even stricter than the COSC.

    The reason for all my comments is because every time i read one of your comments i find something wrong with your logic and i can't fit enough information into one comment to correct you.

    Keep collecting your "real" watches.

  • What are you talking about? The tourbillon video i have is something a customer sent in because it would stop running randomly.

    The problem wasn't the construction of the movement it was the assembly, it had particles of what looked like brass in the center wheel's teeth and they would get caught against the barrel and stop the watch.

    See, unlike you, i actually have experience from working on real watches. You dismiss anything that isn't Swiss and you say you have a passion for horology?

  • Why don't you just respond to anything that i've said? You just keep trying to find something about me that's going to just suddenly change everything that i've said so far. You still think this is a Chinese knock off after i even sent you the video of another vintage tourbillon pocket watch similar to this.

    You're also the one who decided to waist my time with your message, i wasn't going to even respond to your nonsense comment until you messaged me telling me about how you spend your money.

  • So, why is a tourbillon a complication? You seem to know so much about it, yet you have no real information to back up anything you say. I sound like a child? Please, you're just an insecure moron who realized just how pathetic he was and got himself in way over his head.

    You can't even make an argument because you have nothing to add, you have no information to provide, nothing to back up and nothing of worth.

  • @doubleup5150 LMFAO, what a pilock, honestly.

  • A tourbillon is NOT a complication, i'm student my teachers confirmed me that it is not a complication

  • something about the movement, dont think it is a true tourbillion, looks cheap

  • It's not cheap. What experience do you have with high end watches? I could show this to any of my colleagues and they'd say it's very high quality. I don't know who made these, but i've seen variations of this same type of tourbillon. This type with the tourbillon on the dial side is rarer than the kind with the tourbillon on the back visible from a small crystal, but neither of them are cheap, even in bad condition they're at least a few grand.

  • ダボ押しの花時計でトゥルビヨンは始めて見た

  • who made this watch

  • Comment removed

  • Call me crazy, but it looks a lot like a Hebdomas, which would be crazy since almost all Hebdomas watches had low end movements, and the only upside to them were the elaborate dials and hands, but this has a tourbillon, so either this is one of those 1 dollar tourbillon that were selling around the advent of the wristwatch or this is a genuinely well made Hebdomas, or just not a Hebdomas at all, but the case, crown, dial position, bridge over the balance all scream HEBDOMAS.

  • It does look like a hebdoma, but I looked for a tourbillon hebdomas around the web and come out empty. So I believe its a custom made pocket watch and thank you the information

  • It's rare, but i highly doubt it to be custom made, i've seen a few tourbillon pocket watches like this, the bridge and cage are always a little different, but the design is nearly identical. During the advent of the wrist watch a lot of these tourbillon pocket watches were being sold for a dollar, so even though this is very well finished, it's unlikely to have been custom made, most of the parts probably weren't even hand made.

  • There's actually one selling on ebay right now for around 4k, selling through Ashland investments.

  • What? No... you're confused.

    You're thinking of dollar watches, which were made before the popularity of wrist watches even came to be.

    That said, they were all very low grade and NONE of them were tourbillons.

    All zero jewel, pressed plate pieces of junk. But, they kept time within a minute a day and for a dollar or so gave everyone who wanted it, a time piece to call their own.

  • I'm not confused, they were at one point selling for 1 dollar, and yes they were tourbillon. Tourbillon watches aren't as amazing as the "luxury" swiss companies claim.

    Look up Waterbury Tourbillon. They were so cheap you had to set the hands on them like clocks, by manually moving the hands. They're not the same as a tourbillon where only the escapement and balance rotate, the entire movement rotates inside the case, therefore making it a tourbillon.

  • Ah! You're talking about the few "Long Winds" made.

    However, it requires a very liberal interpretation of the word "Tourbillon" as in true horological terms, a true tourbillon is one where the escapement and balance wheel rotate in their own cage, disconnected from the movement.

    Rather in the case with the long winds, the entire movement rotates inside the case.

    Emulating, but not acting as a true tourbillon.

    However, I do agree the tourbillon is a very overvalued complication.

  • In my opinion a tourbillon is defined by it's effects not on it's execution.

    Also, clearly it's acting as a true tourbillon, the escapement and regulating mechanisms rotate in it's own axis inside the watch, because there's a center wheel in the casing where the rest of the movement rotates it's technically rotating inside the movement.

    A tourbillon is also not a complication, it doesn't change the way you tell time nor add anything extra to the normal time telling.

  • I vote it to be modern custom made, stylized for hebdomas. And tourbillon is a complication, because it does nothing but is a funny thing, harder to manufacture and hence more prestigious. I complicates the movement.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more