The arrow of time is not absolute & there is a small amount of non-linearity in quantum mechanics. Retro-causation is not impossible, you can influence the past. You can also see the future before it happens. These phenomena have been recorded & documented. Go look it up.
Good seminar but I disagree that the arrow of time is determined by entropy. Ultimately measured by perhaps, but you could reverse entropy in a sealed box would time go backwards in that box? The arrow of time seems to me like any other spacial dimension, he says that up is only up because we have a point of reference but in a 1 dimensional space the spacial arrow would be apperent.Time is 1 dimensional, and the idea of a negative spacial dimention does not seem to make sense.
The speaker is correct when he says that the lowest degree of entropy existed during the earliest time of the universe. However, he contradicts himself when he says that the stars, planets & galaxies were formed at a later time because that constitutes a greater degree of order & therefor, a decrease in entropy as time moved forward
Entropy disallows Cosmological Evolution from ever occurring. Thus Abiogenesis, being dependent upon Cosmo Evo, couldn't have occurred either & Bio Evo didnt either
The reason why he says that they get stuck at the point of the Big Bang is because they refuse to recognize that is the point of creation. Einstein's math revealed that space/time is finite & must have a beginning. That caused Big Bang theory. However, space/time is the universe, & the universe is nature. Thus, logically, naturalistic causes cannot account for the Big Bang because an effect cannot be its own cause. Logic dictates that a supernatural cause must have produced the Big Bang effect
The speaker speculates that the Big Bang wasn't the beginning, but that something existed prior to the Big Bang. However, that merely adds an extension of time to the phenomena & its still necessary to explain its own beginning... resulting in the same scenario, once again
Time/space didn't exist. Then, from one moment to the next, the universe was spoken into existence. It suddenly exploded onto the scene... hence, the "Big Bang". This is consistent with the 2nd principle of the Law of Thermo.
1:04:08 He finally says what bothered me when he brought up the Boltzmann brain problem. For a signal, it's easy to describe a complex waveform with only a few parameters--if the waveform repeats forever. But it can take an infinite number of parameters to describe a single pulse while keeping everything else static. It may be "cheaper" to change a few parameters that cause galaxies to form around the whole universe, rather than one galaxy while everything else stays in equilibrium. Brains, too.
We all have to live and die, so the truth about life and death concerns and applies to us all. True or false? Search "TRUTH CONTEST" in Google and click the 1st result, then open The Present and read what it says to learn the Truth. Let's get serious and honest about the truth of life.
@CHRIS3BEVAN ....statistical likelihood makes it likely I'll have been dead, and you, many times over. The universe will have achieved a near zero thermal state, many times over, before it happens. Yet in an infinite amount of time, it must happen.
@Raflegan The statistical likelikood is one huge fat zero.
I guess this is where we differ... coz you look at reality as a finit thing where everything decays whereas I see reality (the true reality) is not what scientists think is reality.
The true reality is finite where nothing decays.
The latest results from Sweden are already starting to confire the big bang theory is complete bull. When will scientists realise they are trying to measure an illusion?
@CHRIS3BEVAN You mean CERN in Switzerland? I think that just had to do with Higgs-Boson, that doesn't really pose a refutation to much else AFAIK. Anyhow, I am not much of an empiricalist; because empiricialism is its own antecedent.
@CHRIS3BEVAN Monkeys don't live long enough to produce Shakespeare's works by chance, but they do reproduce and introduce changes into their species. Given enough time, combined with natural selection where intelligence increases survivability, one of the descendants of those monkeys might write the works of Shakespeare. It happened once already and took only a few million years, if you consider our last common ancestor with monkeys to be a monkey.
{Given enough time, one of the descendants of those monkeys might write the works of Shakespeare. It happened once already and took only a few million years}
This is circular, or "tautological" thought. You began by seeking to explain the postulation of evolutionary theory. Then you presented the assertion that evolution occurred, as evidence that supports the explanation of the postulation
@Chuichupachichi I wasn't arguing for evolution. I was using it as an example of a process by which monkeys could (indirectly) produce the works of Shakespeare in much less time than the age of the universe. Yes, the example presupposes that evolution by natural selection is valid.
@CHRIS3BEVAN Evidence: Monkeys only live for a few decades. The number of possible letter combinations the length of Shakespeare's works has an exponent in the millions. By "Borel's Law", It is so improbable for a monkey to type the text by chance within its lifetime that we can consider it impossible.
@HitfulVids You may have descended from a monkey - but I have not.
Just to let you know about that particular (evolution) lie. It was cooked up by a person called Nimrod who was responsible for building the Tower of Babel.
Ever seen the program 'Monkey' with the priest caled Tribitaka. This program was based on the ancient writings of the time China saw a man roaming claimed his very hairy friend was a monkey that was half evolved into a man.
Entropy is a point of view. where were the atoms of the egg before it was whole. Where where the atoms in the star before it became one. The only thing Entropy can really be tied with is expansion.
"What I'm gonna try to do is to connect things that happen in your everyday life" 2:35
Why don't you just get back at connecting blocks in tetris. and the guy at the beginning introduces him like god is about to appear. he should marry him.
i know in whom i have believed...also, if gravity is the ashes of electricity & time is a function of the square root of negative infinity, then I have had too much time...Thanks for sharing the letter from young Wing, cool. ALSO--take your Baby Universe, here in ours (amongst particular "brains") and have it's TIME run backwards...not for eternity, just back to where it would "ensure" the meeting of all yall. P.S. Time is not straight line it is a 3Dwave contained within 3D "tube". 3D graphs
i know in whom i have believed...also, if gravity is the ashes of electricity & time is a function of the square root of negative infinity, then I have had too much time...Thanks for sharing the letter from young Wing, cool.
English is not my first language, but I am really keen on watching this programme; fortunately there is subtitle here so I can quite understand the contend. Thanz to Google:)
This presentation was from 2010, and it was hosted by, and, I'm assuming, funded by GOOGLE? Better quality can be found in a junior high classroom and, if it weren't for the qualified, distinguished speaker featured, it would not be worth anyone's TIME.
@zachflame123 Exactly! The qualified, distinguished speaker is the reason people spent their TIME listening. Sorry the chairs weren't comfy enough for you.
This presentation was from 2010, and it was hosted by, and, I'm assuming, funded by GOOGLE? Better quality can be found in a junior high classroom and, if it weren't for the qualified, distinguished speaker featured, it would not be worth anyone's TIME.
@Singerjoy wow, i didn't know idiots like you watched videos like this. you clarified that you do not understand the definition of INFINITY - they never said the monkeys can write the entire works of shakespear within the lifetime of the universe, they said within infinity - which means forever. i once tried to explain this to an ex gf, took about 20 minutes and she still didn't believe it. used words like 'hypothetical construct' - so dont worry, your not the only person thats severely disabled
think about this~if we could put information on a light beam and send it into space we could hook up all the info on that light beam to all the computers on earth and know the future einstein said that the faster you leave the earth the slower you live compared to people on earth so if we could read the light signals as it go,s away from earth we could hear the future over via" radio waves or computers think about this~we would hear the future as light go,s faster away from earth time is speedup
@aqaehsan11 yes" I know this? but if we could do this for just one year? I mean send light out and wait just one yr, for it to come back to us? 18 yrs, will have past" and this is alot of time to see whats going to happen" I might be wrong about the physics of it and' or its probabley impossible? but if we could do this? it would be fasinating" but I doubt if this could really be done, its just a theory of mine...
to me? we could see the future just by building a computer where as if you send a light beam into space and if we can retrieve that first light somehow that we sent in space and the information on it then we could see the future if its true that einstein said if we left the earth at light speed? and came back yrs, would of past on earth where as minutes would of past for the light think about this~the light will have the info from the future when we look at the info it collected when it left !!
~all I know is? if this happened once~ it will happen again and agan and forever! space is infinate in every direction! inwards and outwards space is so infinate? that this big bang? was as a firefly in the middle of noplace, and in fact? space is so infinate that everywhere there are big bangs going off constantly" and have been doing so forever! no begining> no ending" space is a non stopping life mechanism of nature that makes life that is created and die out non stop" forever! and forever!!
@55painterman Too bad for me. I tried to read through your comments but you have such a lousy bad habit of not using punctuation, or maybe don't know how, that it's pretty much too hard to understand what you've written. Nothing is in complete thoughts or sentences. Too hard to know where to start or stop. Half quotes, question marks where there isn't even a question. Punctuation is really important - makes something readable or not.
You know, its okay to me that the majority of people like to watch other vids on youtube (cuz I've seen my share). I just like knowing I'm part of an elite, intellectual group that watches and enjoys these kinda vids :)
His idea of time and space is a good one. Expansion of a baby universe creates heat in the millions of degrees? And the part about monkeys typing for infinity will some how get one of them to type a book just doesn't seem logical.
I wonder how the first atoms and quarks came to be?
@HerrKnitler The Expansion Rate is already faster than the speed of light! Cutting edge physics can really mess with your head if you let it in too much :p
No, the Expansion Rate is not faster than the speed of light. It's actually not even close.
However, the more space there is between two galaxies/clusters, the more expansion of space there is between them, so the faster one recedes from the other. So for very distant galaxies, their recession speed approaches that of light, and those that a far enough away recede superluminally.
Sean jokes that his photo of the Big Bang is a false color image. But interestingly, the earliest view that we really have of the Universe, the Cosmic Background Radiation, as "photographed" by COBE, WMAP, and Planck, while in the microwave range today, originally had blackbody temperature of 3000k, before being red-shifted by its long jouney through space. Which is almost exactly the spectrum of your average 100 watt light bulb.
Interesting.. I feel we are all underground like in an ant farm. Earth is just a spotlight selected within a broader uncultivated area. Big Bang exist underground only. Then the water seeps in to begin creation. the sun is round because it is seen by us through a peep-hole that size.. so it is actually alot bigger than the circle we see thru underground, it has no shape like pure fire.
I found this video amazing. Every time i tidy my bedroom and observe it getting progressively messier, i am really observing the progression of the universe to a higher entropy state...
Hmmm. So how does he propose all this vacuum energy gets concentrated in one pinched off spot? Isn't vacuum energy uniform by nature? I've heard of measurements of vacuum energy -- never heard of vast differences in measured value though...
okay im going to reveal how stupid I am. I have absolutely no knowledge of physics whatsoever. I watched some other Cambridge lecture where this other physicist dude was trying to say biology is a fundamental force in physics rather than something that sits on top of classical physics. If biology is a self organizing force, is it possible its just a form of energy tranfer or is it new energy leaking into the system from adjacent universes? perhaps both?
I don't see the connection between life and other universes. I think it can be explained like you said that we are ultimately a system that can transfer energy to ourselves, actively.
And yes, biology is ultimately an extension of chemistry which is an extension of the laws of physics. It's all just the human mind that needs to compartmentalise stuff. It'd be pretty hard to learn anything at all if the starting point isn't well defined.
@HerrKnitler - ultimately your starting point logic doesnt seem well compartmentalized. but thanks for taking a stab at my random jibberish. i caught some other lecture series on the historic interplay of religion and science and figred out that the cambridge physicist dude was trying to find a sneaky way to bring creationism or some other intelligent design type theories into the mix.
I'm a nobody, but I just want to say that time is not there because of entropy but time is there because of the existence of irreversibility. The only way to stop time is to prepare for a total reversible state. And going back in time is impossible. If we went beyond the speed of light, then we would've gone faster than our brain electric signals but it doesn't mean that we would go back in time, this is just me.
As far as I'm aware, there is no law in physics that says that time can't go backwards. So in all technicality time CAN reverse, maybe loop. That irreversibility you talk of does not actually exist. Just random chance would say to only few molecules of the egg "you can form your pre-cooked state." Given enough times and enough eggs, it IS possible to say that only a few times out of, say, a trillion, the egg will revert.
@TheCopaceticMan just consider this, if time would go backwards then the going backwards would took place after the current, that's not going back in time but going to the future. In the case of this video there was no guarantee that going towards lower entropies would always took the same path. I still think that physician's entropies are not the real disorder nor the determinants of time but merely some unidentified raw materials. By def, entropies = disorder, our inability to classify.
Yah, I posted those comment before I watched the video (wouldn't load so I just read few comments, the refreshed). Frankly, if what this guy says is true, (if I understand it) then what I say does have 'SOME' validity, but would take far more time to occur than the universe is around (it relates to the random motion of the atoms of a gas).
but I did get this exact idea from Michio Kaku. The whole random chance thing may not be accurate, it was the best way I could explain it.
P.s.
According to the laws of special relativity, if an object travels faster than the speed of light, the laws break down. 1/0 has never been calculated, and that is what happens when you travel at the speed of light. Talking about faster than the speed of light becomes meaningless. (You'd also have the same effect happening with distance, mass, etc)
Its it rather prpbable every soul exist in bolsmanbrain in its own universe but still conected to the main universe to get the illusion of everythings real due to interaction ?
Free energy has been here for a while ,But Elite controllers don't want ppl to be free from the costs of energy,Get a motor that works with the power of magnets only at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Start the revolution!
i say there is no such thing as the arrow of time. we experience time different from person to person. one person can do the same work in one hour when the other person use two hours to do the same work. thats because for one person the signals in his brain is going really fast and for the other person the signals are going alot slower, but both of them have experienced one hour. we made the minutes and hours, and not the universe. nothing goes faster than the speed of thought.
the signals are all going by roughly the same speed. Whether or not these forms neural patterns that are useful from a pratical perscpetive of fx work and perception of time is of course varying from person to person, situation and time, and that people biological clock vary too so that they experience an hour differently, is true too. You got that right. But that doesn't really have much to do
with the arrow of time, and thus you're probably still wrong..
I do feel compelled to comment because I have my own theories which I think fit and are indeed within the realm of explanation. Ill note two, 1) Time is actually Gravity, because they are directly dependent upon each other ex. when speed is infinite, gravity is also infinite, but time stops. 2) I have a video on my YouTube account showing how I believe the universe came into existence, kind of like 2 groups of dimensions meeting, while keeping a point of creation as it's origin, have a look!
Its always a little disappointing to me that TechTalk videos tend to have a few thousand views, but skate boarding dogs get millions. Just a random observation.
@srushaggs I think exactly that every time I watch any of this kind of lectures. But, people always watch only videos that they have any interest. And if you dont have any interest in this kinda stuff, this is boring as hell.
Not really, there is only a small number that can or are able to drive the future. And among those who have the raw potential, there are so many different potential directions that you would expect them to be spread pretty thin.
More than that, it's an impending disaster in a world which insists upon democracy. An unenlightened democracy is far worse than even a moderately enlightened dictatorship.
You are absolutely right. People are more interested in fun than knowledge. We have not developed taste of knowledge. Those who develop this taste they can not live without learning and discovering something new everyday... We need a department which would be responsible to keep feeding rebellious thoughts of existing things..Keep them disturb from what is available. Make them motivate to create which is better... Only then we can get more hits here :)
@srushaggs I recently came across this very funny video of the 2007 Miss South Carolina. She had difficulty time answering why so many American can't locate the U.S on the world map. As you said, just a random observation!
@srushaggs - It's a repetitive phenomenon unfortunately. Tell people there's a soccer game on this weekend and you'll get 1000's of people attending. Tell them there's a working bee for an underprivileged community and tumbleweeds are seen floating by that day. Horse race meeting vs litter clean up day, same result. It's been like that for centuries ie. Roman Colosseum days. People are more often enticed by depravity, carnage, violence, etc, than wanting to better another's life or their own.
@kadzbiz iam pridem, ex quo suffragia nulli / uendimus, effudit curas; nam qui dabat olim / imperium, fasces, legiones, omnia, nunc se / continet atque duas tantum res anxius optat, / panem et circenses
@srushaggs The dumb folks don't care, and the smart folks get their info elsewhere. That leaves the dumb folks who aspire to be smart, watch shows like this, and try to act all superior to the skate-boarding dog-watchers. There are a few thousand of them.
@srushaggs Kind of like how more Americans are concerned about who wins American Idol, than who gets elected to public office. The elite and their MSM mouthpiece like it this way, too. Keep the masses interested in mindless garbage of no particular importance, and ignorant of the things that actually affect their lives, and they will be easy to control.
@srushaggs i guess we as country (U.S) are not on this intellectual level yet and it seems like it's more popular in russia than the U.S but at least it's more popular in the U.S than australia and canada
@srushaggs heres a couple other observations. I can come to a party and talk with no more than one person about something besides gossip, drinking, partying and unintelligent topics. The one person I do sit down with and discuss space and time with has a passion for it. Even more interesting is that even when talking with him/her about this people will walk by informing us that "no one cares"...even though were both discussing it. Intelligence is looked down upon and its now cool to be stupid :(
Love the Sean Carroll. There are physicists who disagree with him strenuously about his many-worlds theory -- I'm not qualified to have an opinion -- but he's a terrific speaker and wonderful at explaining things. We're lucky to have him.
i didn't like that way of showing the video the man in a very small at the top corner they could have made it in a different way like showing the man then when he brings an image they show the image instead of him for a minute then remove it and so on!
i like the experiment where they make people play video games were the controller works a second before the game. after they synced the controller with the game the subjects said they felt like they were ahead of time.
something like that. Rob from the "10thdim" channel speaks of it.
If one uses fractal patterns as placeholders one can achieve the answers to the questions you are asking. Make your placeholders dynamic, not static. the universe isnt static. its a simple conversion, its the same math but its in motion and you will get more answers than you had questions for.
If entropy raises because there is higher chances for it to raise, doesn't it mean it can't go down sometimes for a little while (like for example making ourselves). According to QM it should be possible just unlikely, maybe big bangs are just things that happen from time to time, or maybe, just maybe, this weed was way too good.
@rata0071 you are on to something cause i totally get what you are saying however I think my weed is great tonight so im not sure ill understand it later.
@jonask9 - He explains it's pointless to asume it, even if there is the possibility. Also, he explains that it's more probable to create a baby universe in which, at relative low entropy you and your brain exists than have a single, high entropy universe where you are just a disembodied brain for a few seconds. So, from a multiverse point of view, it's more likely you're not a disembodied brain.
I read the book a while ago. Unfortunately, I was completely bored by the book and this talk. I'm just too educated about thermo to begin with to find much novel about his material, which is mostly basic physics prerequisites.
His only distinguishing claim is the gas model that collapses to a low entropy point making a double arrow of time. Unfortunately, requiring an infinite amount of time fails the basic existentialist usefulness. If all possible universes exist then we exist, QED.
So the entropy at the big bang was lowest then ever?!?! Little particles running around is lower entropy than galaxies with stars and planets and life. hm... again ... hm
i love the lecture indeed.. not boring.. lol ofcourse, because i love it..
lovelplants 1 week ago
@megacaviagek No it's not... But then it took an arrow to the knee...
aliancer 2 weeks ago
I used to know about the Arrow of Time, but then I took it i...
...Okay that joke is really lame.
megacaviagek 1 month ago 2
how does it feel to waste you life on soon to be proven beliefs
tyberiswolf 1 month ago
At 0:30 You can hear him fart. =)
EvilTho 3 months ago
pshh this dude with the dumb ass questions at the end cracks me up.
bprluva 3 months ago
The arrow of time is not absolute & there is a small amount of non-linearity in quantum mechanics. Retro-causation is not impossible, you can influence the past. You can also see the future before it happens. These phenomena have been recorded & documented. Go look it up.
Galv140577 4 months ago
Pro Tip: Watch the at 360p. Audio is drastically better in the 360p version than in the 480p version.
Sooung 4 months ago in playlist Sooung's favorites
The Matter Universe began from negative 4D Minkowski continuum
The formula of this negative space is T=- 273,16 = 0K
The negative 4D is a flat Infinite Pseudo Euclidian space
The 4D is Vacuum, Nothingness , Emptiness
But the Emptiness isn’t emptiness
In this Empty space virtual particles exist
From these virtual particles stars were created
These stars (3D) exist in infinite space
All billions and billions stars and Galaxies exist in this infinite Pseudo Euclidian space T= 0K
socratus1 4 months ago
So... if there are many Universes, what's inbetween them and what's 'holding' all these universes?
For example, a House plant, in a room, in a House, in a Street, in a Town, in a country, on earth, in the galaxy, in the universe, in the...?
TheMassAnnoyance 4 months ago
@TheMassAnnoyance : you're thinking in 3d terms. The additional multiverses imply additional dimensions to our know 3 spacial dimensions
selvmordspilot 3 months ago
"In our Galaxy, there are 100 Billion Stars. In the observable Universe, there are at least 100 Billion Galaxys, each with 100 Billion Stars."
Makes our 80 Year lives seem pointless, really.
TheMassAnnoyance 4 months ago
Good seminar but I disagree that the arrow of time is determined by entropy. Ultimately measured by perhaps, but you could reverse entropy in a sealed box would time go backwards in that box? The arrow of time seems to me like any other spacial dimension, he says that up is only up because we have a point of reference but in a 1 dimensional space the spacial arrow would be apperent.Time is 1 dimensional, and the idea of a negative spacial dimention does not seem to make sense.
phookadude 5 months ago
The speaker is correct when he says that the lowest degree of entropy existed during the earliest time of the universe. However, he contradicts himself when he says that the stars, planets & galaxies were formed at a later time because that constitutes a greater degree of order & therefor, a decrease in entropy as time moved forward
Entropy disallows Cosmological Evolution from ever occurring. Thus Abiogenesis, being dependent upon Cosmo Evo, couldn't have occurred either & Bio Evo didnt either
Chuichupachichi 5 months ago
The reason why he says that they get stuck at the point of the Big Bang is because they refuse to recognize that is the point of creation. Einstein's math revealed that space/time is finite & must have a beginning. That caused Big Bang theory. However, space/time is the universe, & the universe is nature. Thus, logically, naturalistic causes cannot account for the Big Bang because an effect cannot be its own cause. Logic dictates that a supernatural cause must have produced the Big Bang effect
Chuichupachichi 5 months ago
The speaker speculates that the Big Bang wasn't the beginning, but that something existed prior to the Big Bang. However, that merely adds an extension of time to the phenomena & its still necessary to explain its own beginning... resulting in the same scenario, once again
Time/space didn't exist. Then, from one moment to the next, the universe was spoken into existence. It suddenly exploded onto the scene... hence, the "Big Bang". This is consistent with the 2nd principle of the Law of Thermo.
Chuichupachichi 5 months ago
1:04:08 He finally says what bothered me when he brought up the Boltzmann brain problem. For a signal, it's easy to describe a complex waveform with only a few parameters--if the waveform repeats forever. But it can take an infinite number of parameters to describe a single pulse while keeping everything else static. It may be "cheaper" to change a few parameters that cause galaxies to form around the whole universe, rather than one galaxy while everything else stays in equilibrium. Brains, too.
HitfulVids 5 months ago
@CHRIS3BEVAN You realize he's saying this was a proposed idea that is known to be wrong, i hope....
cloffff 5 months ago
@cloffff Yup.
CHRIS3BEVAN 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We all have to live and die, so the truth about life and death concerns and applies to us all. True or false? Search "TRUTH CONTEST" in Google and click the 1st result, then open The Present and read what it says to learn the Truth. Let's get serious and honest about the truth of life.
DemianHermann 6 months ago
He kinda talks like Michio Kaku, lol
n30l1nk 6 months ago
40:30 - wait long enough and you'll get an universe like ours.
Wait long enough and a hundred monkeys with one typewriter will produce the complete works of Shakespear too.
CHRIS3BEVAN 6 months ago
@CHRIS3BEVAN ....true. That's no refutation.
Raflegan 5 months ago
@Raflegan - let me know when a hundred moneys have written the complete works of Shakespear - then I'll grant it is not refutation.
CHRIS3BEVAN 5 months ago
@CHRIS3BEVAN ....statistical likelihood makes it likely I'll have been dead, and you, many times over. The universe will have achieved a near zero thermal state, many times over, before it happens. Yet in an infinite amount of time, it must happen.
Raflegan 5 months ago
@Raflegan I love it when the scientific mind shows its madness.
Fair play Raf... I find that very entertaining.
God Bless You <3
CHRIS3BEVAN 5 months ago
@Raflegan The statistical likelikood is one huge fat zero.
I guess this is where we differ... coz you look at reality as a finit thing where everything decays whereas I see reality (the true reality) is not what scientists think is reality.
The true reality is finite where nothing decays.
The latest results from Sweden are already starting to confire the big bang theory is complete bull. When will scientists realise they are trying to measure an illusion?
CHRIS3BEVAN 5 months ago
@CHRIS3BEVAN It's just following the second law of thermal dynamics, not anything to do with big bang or what-have-you.
Raflegan 5 months ago
@Raflegan - I take it you haven't heard of the latest that's coming out of Sweden (particle accelerator project).
Oops...
Better hold your breath on that one... lol
CHRIS3BEVAN 5 months ago
@CHRIS3BEVAN You mean CERN in Switzerland? I think that just had to do with Higgs-Boson, that doesn't really pose a refutation to much else AFAIK. Anyhow, I am not much of an empiricalist; because empiricialism is its own antecedent.
Raflegan 5 months ago
@Raflegan Yawn.
CHRIS3BEVAN 3 months ago
@CHRIS3BEVAN Monkeys don't live long enough to produce Shakespeare's works by chance, but they do reproduce and introduce changes into their species. Given enough time, combined with natural selection where intelligence increases survivability, one of the descendants of those monkeys might write the works of Shakespeare. It happened once already and took only a few million years, if you consider our last common ancestor with monkeys to be a monkey.
HitfulVids 5 months ago
@HitfulVids
{Given enough time, one of the descendants of those monkeys might write the works of Shakespeare. It happened once already and took only a few million years}
This is circular, or "tautological" thought. You began by seeking to explain the postulation of evolutionary theory. Then you presented the assertion that evolution occurred, as evidence that supports the explanation of the postulation
Chuichupachichi 5 months ago
@Chuichupachichi I wasn't arguing for evolution. I was using it as an example of a process by which monkeys could (indirectly) produce the works of Shakespeare in much less time than the age of the universe. Yes, the example presupposes that evolution by natural selection is valid.
HitfulVids 5 months ago
@HitfulVids
Appropriately enough, considering that Evolutionary theory was born of tautology
"the individuals of a population that are the most fit (identified as those producing the most offspring) will produce the most offspring"
Chuichupachichi 5 months ago
@Chuichupachichi Huh? That's not evolutionary theory. What source are you quoting?
HitfulVids 5 months ago
@HitfulVids - and your evidence for this is?
...lacking any credibility - yawn.
CHRIS3BEVAN 5 months ago
@CHRIS3BEVAN Evidence: Monkeys only live for a few decades. The number of possible letter combinations the length of Shakespeare's works has an exponent in the millions. By "Borel's Law", It is so improbable for a monkey to type the text by chance within its lifetime that we can consider it impossible.
HitfulVids 5 months ago
@HitfulVids You may have descended from a monkey - but I have not.
Just to let you know about that particular (evolution) lie. It was cooked up by a person called Nimrod who was responsible for building the Tower of Babel.
Ever seen the program 'Monkey' with the priest caled Tribitaka. This program was based on the ancient writings of the time China saw a man roaming claimed his very hairy friend was a monkey that was half evolved into a man.
Looks like these facts will catch up some day.
CHRIS3BEVAN 3 months ago
Comment removed
CHRIS3BEVAN 6 months ago
Entropy is a point of view. where were the atoms of the egg before it was whole. Where where the atoms in the star before it became one. The only thing Entropy can really be tied with is expansion.
mysticlawlotus 6 months ago
Links to some of his jokes:
2:27 google
33:04 googol years
44:11 Translated mail
46:28 Egg
Krismath 6 months ago
Comment removed
Superfresh602 7 months ago
oh no we won't exist in 10 ^ 90 years haha
Superfresh602 7 months ago
i love this video. and btw religion is retarded. enough said.
FallofDarkness55 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Harold Camping was RIGHT about May 21, click on my channel to see...
youneekk 7 months ago
A pity that Google sold us out for CA$H. Lifes do fall onto you guys....
AntiChrista4WPeace 7 months ago
"What I'm gonna try to do is to connect things that happen in your everyday life" 2:35
Why don't you just get back at connecting blocks in tetris. and the guy at the beginning introduces him like god is about to appear. he should marry him.
50movesaheadofyou 7 months ago
@50movesaheadofyou Sean M. Carroll is a God.
iasedu 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
uuuuuu look at me, I'm Sean. I went to a university and have my own wikipedia page. I'm so much better than you. uuuuuuuuu
50movesaheadofyou 7 months ago
Comment removed
50movesaheadofyou 7 months ago
i know in whom i have believed...also, if gravity is the ashes of electricity & time is a function of the square root of negative infinity, then I have had too much time...Thanks for sharing the letter from young Wing, cool. ALSO--take your Baby Universe, here in ours (amongst particular "brains") and have it's TIME run backwards...not for eternity, just back to where it would "ensure" the meeting of all yall. P.S. Time is not straight line it is a 3Dwave contained within 3D "tube". 3D graphs
FlyingAxblade 7 months ago
i know in whom i have believed...also, if gravity is the ashes of electricity & time is a function of the square root of negative infinity, then I have had too much time...Thanks for sharing the letter from young Wing, cool.
FlyingAxblade 7 months ago
English is not my first language, but I am really keen on watching this programme; fortunately there is subtitle here so I can quite understand the contend. Thanz to Google:)
timesquareonline 7 months ago
This presentation was from 2010, and it was hosted by, and, I'm assuming, funded by GOOGLE? Better quality can be found in a junior high classroom and, if it weren't for the qualified, distinguished speaker featured, it would not be worth anyone's TIME.
zachflame123 7 months ago
@zachflame123 Exactly! The qualified, distinguished speaker is the reason people spent their TIME listening. Sorry the chairs weren't comfy enough for you.
dalejosef 7 months ago
This presentation was from 2010, and it was hosted by, and, I'm assuming, funded by GOOGLE? Better quality can be found in a junior high classroom and, if it weren't for the qualified, distinguished speaker featured, it would not be worth anyone's TIME.
zachflame123 7 months ago
there is no such thing as time its just passage of eternity
lazzerwolf 8 months ago
@Singerjoy wow, i didn't know idiots like you watched videos like this. you clarified that you do not understand the definition of INFINITY - they never said the monkeys can write the entire works of shakespear within the lifetime of the universe, they said within infinity - which means forever. i once tried to explain this to an ex gf, took about 20 minutes and she still didn't believe it. used words like 'hypothetical construct' - so dont worry, your not the only person thats severely disabled
bm3racer 8 months ago
DId someone at Google just ask about 2012? Am I imagining things?
mixtliful 8 months ago
Time is Maya...an illusion.
roshmalai 9 months ago
think about this~if we could put information on a light beam and send it into space we could hook up all the info on that light beam to all the computers on earth and know the future einstein said that the faster you leave the earth the slower you live compared to people on earth so if we could read the light signals as it go,s away from earth we could hear the future over via" radio waves or computers think about this~we would hear the future as light go,s faster away from earth time is speedup
55painterman 9 months ago
@55painterman no you would not!the information will still have to travel back to you and it will take time ,even with the speed of light!
aqaehsan11 8 months ago
@aqaehsan11 yes" I know this? but if we could do this for just one year? I mean send light out and wait just one yr, for it to come back to us? 18 yrs, will have past" and this is alot of time to see whats going to happen" I might be wrong about the physics of it and' or its probabley impossible? but if we could do this? it would be fasinating" but I doubt if this could really be done, its just a theory of mine...
55painterman 8 months ago
to me? we could see the future just by building a computer where as if you send a light beam into space and if we can retrieve that first light somehow that we sent in space and the information on it then we could see the future if its true that einstein said if we left the earth at light speed? and came back yrs, would of past on earth where as minutes would of past for the light think about this~the light will have the info from the future when we look at the info it collected when it left !!
55painterman 9 months ago
~all I know is? if this happened once~ it will happen again and agan and forever! space is infinate in every direction! inwards and outwards space is so infinate? that this big bang? was as a firefly in the middle of noplace, and in fact? space is so infinate that everywhere there are big bangs going off constantly" and have been doing so forever! no begining> no ending" space is a non stopping life mechanism of nature that makes life that is created and die out non stop" forever! and forever!!
55painterman 9 months ago
@55painterman Too bad for me. I tried to read through your comments but you have such a lousy bad habit of not using punctuation, or maybe don't know how, that it's pretty much too hard to understand what you've written. Nothing is in complete thoughts or sentences. Too hard to know where to start or stop. Half quotes, question marks where there isn't even a question. Punctuation is really important - makes something readable or not.
MrDBarch 8 months ago
@MrDBarch thats only because what I,m writing? doesn,t make sense either"...:}..plus I,m only 5 yrs, old...
55painterman 8 months ago
"Time is really a big ball of wibbily-wobbily, timey-wimey ... stuff!" - The Doctor
MisterEvil1 10 months ago
You know, its okay to me that the majority of people like to watch other vids on youtube (cuz I've seen my share). I just like knowing I'm part of an elite, intellectual group that watches and enjoys these kinda vids :)
sparkymarky710 10 months ago
I wonder what the universes where you can remember tomorrow are like? Anyone have any thoughts on that?
Sicknessdoa 10 months ago
@Sicknessdoa I think he answered that , anyway what you talk about is fantasy and the only ones that has this are people like Nostradamus
exxalte 9 months ago
His idea of time and space is a good one. Expansion of a baby universe creates heat in the millions of degrees? And the part about monkeys typing for infinity will some how get one of them to type a book just doesn't seem logical.
I wonder how the first atoms and quarks came to be?
Singerjoy 11 months ago
History vs Science= NOT COMPARABLE
kbawesome101 11 months ago
Google. Googol.
There's a diff.
OneVoiceMore 1 year ago
im the 33,000th viewer :)
presbarkeep 1 year ago
So what happens when the expansion rate reaches the speed of light?
Can this cause dark matter to start fluctuating in strength perhaps?
HerrKnitler 1 year ago
@HerrKnitler The Expansion Rate is already faster than the speed of light! Cutting edge physics can really mess with your head if you let it in too much :p
Relbl 1 year ago
@Relbl
No, the Expansion Rate is not faster than the speed of light. It's actually not even close.
However, the more space there is between two galaxies/clusters, the more expansion of space there is between them, so the faster one recedes from the other. So for very distant galaxies, their recession speed approaches that of light, and those that a far enough away recede superluminally.
DNAunion 1 year ago
So basically this is the excuse I need to not clean my room. Who am I to argue with the universe :)
HerrKnitler 1 year ago
Sean jokes that his photo of the Big Bang is a false color image. But interestingly, the earliest view that we really have of the Universe, the Cosmic Background Radiation, as "photographed" by COBE, WMAP, and Planck, while in the microwave range today, originally had blackbody temperature of 3000k, before being red-shifted by its long jouney through space. Which is almost exactly the spectrum of your average 100 watt light bulb.
sbergman27 1 year ago
Interesting.. I feel we are all underground like in an ant farm. Earth is just a spotlight selected within a broader uncultivated area. Big Bang exist underground only. Then the water seeps in to begin creation. the sun is round because it is seen by us through a peep-hole that size.. so it is actually alot bigger than the circle we see thru underground, it has no shape like pure fire.
18verified 1 year ago
I found this video amazing. Every time i tidy my bedroom and observe it getting progressively messier, i am really observing the progression of the universe to a higher entropy state...
John2Thornton 1 year ago
@John2Thornton that's brilliant, that's why the big bang doesn't work because it goes from order to chaos not chaos to order
lazzerwolf 8 months ago
the pinched off energy looks like graphics ive seen of back holes. is this the "we live in a black hole" theory?
ginsushark 1 year ago
Hmmm. So how does he propose all this vacuum energy gets concentrated in one pinched off spot? Isn't vacuum energy uniform by nature? I've heard of measurements of vacuum energy -- never heard of vast differences in measured value though...
goodsnservices 1 year ago
okay im going to reveal how stupid I am. I have absolutely no knowledge of physics whatsoever. I watched some other Cambridge lecture where this other physicist dude was trying to say biology is a fundamental force in physics rather than something that sits on top of classical physics. If biology is a self organizing force, is it possible its just a form of energy tranfer or is it new energy leaking into the system from adjacent universes? perhaps both?
ginsushark 1 year ago
@ginsushark
Fellow idiot here =)
I don't see the connection between life and other universes. I think it can be explained like you said that we are ultimately a system that can transfer energy to ourselves, actively.
And yes, biology is ultimately an extension of chemistry which is an extension of the laws of physics. It's all just the human mind that needs to compartmentalise stuff. It'd be pretty hard to learn anything at all if the starting point isn't well defined.
HerrKnitler 1 year ago
@HerrKnitler - ultimately your starting point logic doesnt seem well compartmentalized. but thanks for taking a stab at my random jibberish. i caught some other lecture series on the historic interplay of religion and science and figred out that the cambridge physicist dude was trying to find a sneaky way to bring creationism or some other intelligent design type theories into the mix.
ginsushark 1 year ago
Excellent talk. Loved it.
paragpandit 1 year ago
This was excellent. Superb. Thanks.
charlesfrith 1 year ago
If a yak craps on an airport runway, it falls to the ground as it would in a strawberry patch. Gravity RULES because God made it that way.
JarJar88forever 1 year ago
I'm a nobody, but I just want to say that time is not there because of entropy but time is there because of the existence of irreversibility. The only way to stop time is to prepare for a total reversible state. And going back in time is impossible. If we went beyond the speed of light, then we would've gone faster than our brain electric signals but it doesn't mean that we would go back in time, this is just me.
Melki 1 year ago
@Melki
As far as I'm aware, there is no law in physics that says that time can't go backwards. So in all technicality time CAN reverse, maybe loop. That irreversibility you talk of does not actually exist. Just random chance would say to only few molecules of the egg "you can form your pre-cooked state." Given enough times and enough eggs, it IS possible to say that only a few times out of, say, a trillion, the egg will revert.
This may not be completely accurate, ...cont...
TheCopaceticMan 1 year ago
@TheCopaceticMan just consider this, if time would go backwards then the going backwards would took place after the current, that's not going back in time but going to the future. In the case of this video there was no guarantee that going towards lower entropies would always took the same path. I still think that physician's entropies are not the real disorder nor the determinants of time but merely some unidentified raw materials. By def, entropies = disorder, our inability to classify.
Melki 1 year ago
@Melki
Yah, I posted those comment before I watched the video (wouldn't load so I just read few comments, the refreshed). Frankly, if what this guy says is true, (if I understand it) then what I say does have 'SOME' validity, but would take far more time to occur than the universe is around (it relates to the random motion of the atoms of a gas).
TheCopaceticMan 1 year ago
@Melki
but I did get this exact idea from Michio Kaku. The whole random chance thing may not be accurate, it was the best way I could explain it.
P.s.
According to the laws of special relativity, if an object travels faster than the speed of light, the laws break down. 1/0 has never been calculated, and that is what happens when you travel at the speed of light. Talking about faster than the speed of light becomes meaningless. (You'd also have the same effect happening with distance, mass, etc)
TheCopaceticMan 1 year ago
So S equals k log omega is not always the case? I'm a christian and this doesn't shook my faith at all.
Melki 1 year ago
@Melki I mean delta S => 0 is not always the case not S equals k log omega. sorry
Melki 1 year ago
Its it rather prpbable every soul exist in bolsmanbrain in its own universe but still conected to the main universe to get the illusion of everythings real due to interaction ?
Qulopuaa 1 year ago
@Qulopuaa The only souls i know of are on the bottoms of shoes haha
1PintLasher 1 year ago
Comment removed
Qulopuaa 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free energy has been here for a while ,But Elite controllers don't want ppl to be free from the costs of energy,Get a motor that works with the power of magnets only at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Start the revolution!
lavernedi 1 year ago
why was there a vid of some guying eating and drinking in the backround? and wtf is wrong with 1/3rd of google employees?
161803 1 year ago
So black holes give birth 2 other universes and then disappear?? could that be possible?
Al2006essandro 1 year ago
i say there is no such thing as the arrow of time. we experience time different from person to person. one person can do the same work in one hour when the other person use two hours to do the same work. thats because for one person the signals in his brain is going really fast and for the other person the signals are going alot slower, but both of them have experienced one hour. we made the minutes and hours, and not the universe. nothing goes faster than the speed of thought.
coldarc 1 year ago
@coldarc
the signals are all going by roughly the same speed. Whether or not these forms neural patterns that are useful from a pratical perscpetive of fx work and perception of time is of course varying from person to person, situation and time, and that people biological clock vary too so that they experience an hour differently, is true too. You got that right. But that doesn't really have much to do
with the arrow of time, and thus you're probably still wrong..
Try watching the start again
MrElectropants 1 year ago
great talk Sean, i was wondering if you could highlight the difference between your scenario and Roger Penrose Conformal Cyclical Cosmology.
skydivephil 1 year ago
I do feel compelled to comment because I have my own theories which I think fit and are indeed within the realm of explanation. Ill note two, 1) Time is actually Gravity, because they are directly dependent upon each other ex. when speed is infinite, gravity is also infinite, but time stops. 2) I have a video on my YouTube account showing how I believe the universe came into existence, kind of like 2 groups of dimensions meeting, while keeping a point of creation as it's origin, have a look!
heavensrevenge 1 year ago
@heavensrevenge Saw your video, and though I do find it interesting, you need the math to back it up ;)
It does not seem to be at odds with the Big Bang theory either, which is just expansion of space itself. It actually seems to fit in with it.
Anyways, I liked your video.
thisisnotanick 1 year ago
pretty fucking absurd that im even typing this..
masterdequo 1 year ago 3
I love this
bracanet 1 year ago 4
Seems like Google can't afford a HD camera.
qborg69 1 year ago 29
the great thing is it's much more difficult but somehow we understand it :)
DRG575 1 year ago
@DRG575 drago???
chikimento 1 year ago
@DRG575 I agree totaly
chikimento 1 year ago
i never liked the forever expanding universe idea but i guess if it makes a lot of baby universes its not so bad
WalterWalkie 1 year ago 2
Its always a little disappointing to me that TechTalk videos tend to have a few thousand views, but skate boarding dogs get millions. Just a random observation.
srushaggs 1 year ago 107
@srushaggs I think exactly that every time I watch any of this kind of lectures. But, people always watch only videos that they have any interest. And if you dont have any interest in this kinda stuff, this is boring as hell.
enkeksinickia 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@srushaggs what does that tell you about mankind?
BinaryReader 1 year ago
@srushaggs
Not really, there is only a small number that can or are able to drive the future. And among those who have the raw potential, there are so many different potential directions that you would expect them to be spread pretty thin.
WorBlux 1 year ago
@srushaggs indeed, reflects the population in general sadly :/
UnknownRex 1 year ago
@srushaggs : "Just a random observation."
More than that, it's an impending disaster in a world which insists upon democracy. An unenlightened democracy is far worse than even a moderately enlightened dictatorship.
sbergman27 1 year ago
@srushaggs "Just a random observation"
You are absolutely right. People are more interested in fun than knowledge. We have not developed taste of knowledge. Those who develop this taste they can not live without learning and discovering something new everyday... We need a department which would be responsible to keep feeding rebellious thoughts of existing things..Keep them disturb from what is available. Make them motivate to create which is better... Only then we can get more hits here :)
Shazigul 1 year ago 2
@srushaggs I recently came across this very funny video of the 2007 Miss South Carolina. She had difficulty time answering why so many American can't locate the U.S on the world map. As you said, just a random observation!
x4xmen 1 year ago
@srushaggs - It's a repetitive phenomenon unfortunately. Tell people there's a soccer game on this weekend and you'll get 1000's of people attending. Tell them there's a working bee for an underprivileged community and tumbleweeds are seen floating by that day. Horse race meeting vs litter clean up day, same result. It's been like that for centuries ie. Roman Colosseum days. People are more often enticed by depravity, carnage, violence, etc, than wanting to better another's life or their own.
kadzbiz 11 months ago
@kadzbiz iam pridem, ex quo suffragia nulli / uendimus, effudit curas; nam qui dabat olim / imperium, fasces, legiones, omnia, nunc se / continet atque duas tantum res anxius optat, / panem et circenses
gamesbok 8 months ago
@srushaggs its cuz dogs are in ya face
SimplyMeHooray 11 months ago
@srushaggs The dumb folks don't care, and the smart folks get their info elsewhere. That leaves the dumb folks who aspire to be smart, watch shows like this, and try to act all superior to the skate-boarding dog-watchers. There are a few thousand of them.
cosmicharlie1970 11 months ago
@cosmicharlie1970 then you must be the dumbest!
aqaehsan11 8 months ago
@srushaggs whats that say about the average intelligence of the population?
Sicknessdoa 10 months ago
@srushaggs Kind of like how more Americans are concerned about who wins American Idol, than who gets elected to public office. The elite and their MSM mouthpiece like it this way, too. Keep the masses interested in mindless garbage of no particular importance, and ignorant of the things that actually affect their lives, and they will be easy to control.
dslgunner1977 9 months ago 21
@dslgunner1977 as i watch my step sister eat nothing but steamed dim sims..(too lose weight)
and idolized the models we see on TV...
i have to say you are dead right....
some peoples ignorance is so depressing...
our race is screwed...
Idiocracy has already begun!
peace
-Peely
azmanabdula 2 months ago
@srushaggs i guess we as country (U.S) are not on this intellectual level yet and it seems like it's more popular in russia than the U.S but at least it's more popular in the U.S than australia and canada
Superfresh602 7 months ago
@srushaggs heres a couple other observations. I can come to a party and talk with no more than one person about something besides gossip, drinking, partying and unintelligent topics. The one person I do sit down with and discuss space and time with has a passion for it. Even more interesting is that even when talking with him/her about this people will walk by informing us that "no one cares"...even though were both discussing it. Intelligence is looked down upon and its now cool to be stupid :(
youngaffiliate52 6 months ago
Love the Sean Carroll. There are physicists who disagree with him strenuously about his many-worlds theory -- I'm not qualified to have an opinion -- but he's a terrific speaker and wonderful at explaining things. We're lucky to have him.
ossicle 1 year ago
Really interesting.
man0riaX 1 year ago
i didn't like that way of showing the video the man in a very small at the top corner they could have made it in a different way like showing the man then when he brings an image they show the image instead of him for a minute then remove it and so on!
medoelkorsan 1 year ago
thanks God universe expanding , i like to have a lot space of living
iti888888 1 year ago
Very very good!
clearly explained, even to non-physicists, a very abstract and complex cosmological theory
Bitt33 1 year ago
An universe with Sarah Palin being a president is a very nasty one...
arubaga 1 year ago 3
I need to find the universal chicken!
armd86 1 year ago 2
i like the experiment where they make people play video games were the controller works a second before the game. after they synced the controller with the game the subjects said they felt like they were ahead of time.
something like that. Rob from the "10thdim" channel speaks of it.
defect530 1 year ago
If one uses fractal patterns as placeholders one can achieve the answers to the questions you are asking. Make your placeholders dynamic, not static. the universe isnt static. its a simple conversion, its the same math but its in motion and you will get more answers than you had questions for.
graceman25 1 year ago
If entropy raises because there is higher chances for it to raise, doesn't it mean it can't go down sometimes for a little while (like for example making ourselves). According to QM it should be possible just unlikely, maybe big bangs are just things that happen from time to time, or maybe, just maybe, this weed was way too good.
rata0071 1 year ago
@rata0071 hmmm maybe i should've waited, i always ruin the movies too
rata0071 1 year ago
@rata0071 Lol! I see what you mean.
JmSantos78 1 year ago
@rata0071 you are on to something cause i totally get what you are saying however I think my weed is great tonight so im not sure ill understand it later.
Malphar 1 year ago
Thanks for this talk. Very interesting.
ChilapaOfTheAmazons 1 year ago
Thumbs up for cosmological chicken!
rtsownage 1 year ago
"The fact that we are first born..." - That's definitely a funny sentence when you've read the Time Odyssey trilogy by Clarke and Baxter
rtsownage 1 year ago
"Things don't completely rearrange themselves from moment to moment" - I reject this statement based on empirical observations of my closet.
rtsownage 1 year ago 4
lots of assumptions...
BezemerPeter 1 year ago
Why does he insists that we are not disembodied brains when it is more probable situation (52:30)? Can anyone help me out?
jonask9 1 year ago
@jonask9 Ok, I got my answer at 1:03:16. Someone at Google had the same doubt.
jonask9 1 year ago
@jonask9 - He explains it's pointless to asume it, even if there is the possibility. Also, he explains that it's more probable to create a baby universe in which, at relative low entropy you and your brain exists than have a single, high entropy universe where you are just a disembodied brain for a few seconds. So, from a multiverse point of view, it's more likely you're not a disembodied brain.
countmarius75 1 year ago
I read the book a while ago. Unfortunately, I was completely bored by the book and this talk. I'm just too educated about thermo to begin with to find much novel about his material, which is mostly basic physics prerequisites.
His only distinguishing claim is the gas model that collapses to a low entropy point making a double arrow of time. Unfortunately, requiring an infinite amount of time fails the basic existentialist usefulness. If all possible universes exist then we exist, QED.
zassounotsukushi 1 year ago
Comment removed
zassounotsukushi 1 year ago
NERDGASM!
LordSlag 1 year ago 2
really interesting and well explained, thanks !
GuzmanTierno 1 year ago
Really good talk, wish i could have been there, i would have had a few questions to ask myself.
BinaryReader 1 year ago
So the entropy at the big bang was lowest then ever?!?! Little particles running around is lower entropy than galaxies with stars and planets and life. hm... again ... hm
iTravelHD 1 year ago
@iTravelHD "So the entropy at the big bang was lowest then ever?!?"
Entropy is a decrease in chaos. It can also be thought of as order, or even information increase.
Mostly, it's used to denote stagnation. And certainly, the Big Bang was the opposite of stagnant.
CurtHowland 1 year ago
There's an annoying high frequency buzz when played at 480p. I recommend going down to 360p.
BigYellowKY 1 year ago 32
@BigYellowKY I can barely hear that anymore, don't worry just give it four more years.
vidz4funz 1 year ago
@BigYellowKY Thanks
TheDoctorNocturne 1 year ago