This is my single favorite clip from the Hitch. He is so eloquent here as he brings together agnosticism, dogma, burden of proof, imagination, humor, and humility.
Referring to Star Wars: "I can quote scripture too!".
I remember my initial response to hearing him saying this while I was watching this debate, "Just when I thought I couldn't love that man's mind any more...!"
@warriorprince1010 The bible proves evolution. Clearly trying to get anything out of you proves an uphill battle that I'm not inclined to fight. Idiot.
@warriorprince1010 Easy to throw out empty claims and just feel victorious isn't it?
Evolutionists have no data. Except transition fossils, layering, the conjoined chromosome lost from our ancestors. You're not even claiming anything loll.
@warriorprince1010 Wow, where do I even start? "Evolutionist" would apply to nearly every single biologist, doctor and any other type of scientist who deals with lifeforms of any kind. "Ideology" cannot even apply to evolution, so I have no idea what you're even trying to say. All branches of science are the study of evidence, not "gods" of any kind. I challenge you to debate me anytime regarding evolution. Let's hear your best "refutation of evolution" ?
@warriorprince1010 You're missing the point, and deliberately, or so it would seem. "Evolutionists" is not a word, either. "Biologists" is the term I believe you're looking for.
And just for shits and giggles, what's a claim that either biologists or the theory of evolution itself has made which have been refuted?
@warriorprince1010 Of course I have no evidence of a negative - negatives cannot be proven. How would you prove, for example, that liquid water does not exist on the sun? I just explained to you that you need to analyze the base requirements of even the simplest form of consciousness. You're basically claiming that life can exist in an immaterial form. Hopefully wording it like that alone should clue you in as to how ridiculous even humoring such a notion is. Think.
@warriorprince1010 Sure you can. You analyze the requirements of consciousness. Is it really that complicated? You need the proper hardware (neurologically and chemically) and an energy source. Can either exist in some sort of a "soul" form? Of course not. Thus, an afterlife is scientifically impossible.
Hitchens won't discuss the many other explanations for the afterlife, he sticks to the established religions because they are so easy to beat in a debate.
His arrogance is astounding. Does he question the developments in quantum physics that have discovered that the physical isn't solid, we just think it is, NO he doesn't he sticks to a very narrow field of reference. I just hope he doesn't wander around in a totally confused state, avoiding the light after he passes.
@TelecasterLPGTop Are you willfully insane? First and foremost, of COURSE he understands the basics of quantum physics you mention. The fact that you'd even question the intelligence of one of the foremost debaters in modern times speaks mountains about your own lack of humility. Secondly, what does our knowledge of atoms have to do with the afterlife... AT ALL? I do not know if you're deliberately obfuscating the issue or if you're simply and quite genuinely too ignorant of it altogether.
@TelecasterLPG- This is the best you got? Magical thinking and arguing a straw man? If you want to make a point then the first step is to add intelligence to any argument you attempt to make.
I saw Hitchens yesterday in Houston accepting the Richard Dawkins Foundation. I also got his autograph. I was shocked to see him so frail. I thought from this video that he was getting better since he still has his weight and his hair was growing back.
But he was bald, much thinner and walked with a bit of a stoop.
Topics: WINNING ARGUMENTS NOW ADDED For The Creationism-Evolutionism Debate (See Subchapter 10.2.2.), The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
Unlike most people on these boards, I actually liked the Jewish guys. They are pretty level headed unlike most religious nuts. They actually had a somewhat interesting and thought provoking conversation.
Well, it could've been as well the scenario Hitchens described, it wouldn't really have mattered. I'm sure he hasn't rewatched that movie 15 times anywhere in the recent past ;)
Although, now that I think about, in the movie, Luke just makes up on the spot that Leia would reward Solo for rescuing her, it's not something she promises herself - and Han says that phrase. So if anything, the accurate example would've been even more fitting ;)
Limbo? LIMBO! Here's your "limbo" (send this to the Vatican):
watch?v=9jkowBtwnHM
Peace,
-Grizz
BTW: There are only two possible results after I die. Reincarnation OR NOTHING. I don't want Angel Wings ... and I already live in Las Vegas, so a little heat won't bother me.
@wiccc1 Are you claiming you have filed a copyright notice? If so, you need to learn what DMCA is. Try reading the notice at the beginning of the video.
@Hopeful71 I thought the same thing until the fourth or fifth time I watched it. He says her "envoy" asks the question who in turn is quoting Leia....the Hitch is in the details LOL....
Nerd moment here... It was actually Luke Skywalker that said that to Han Solo, not Leia... Still love the video, Just sayin... we want the force on our side!
@CambridgeHeights He's never denied that an afterlife was possible, just that there's no proof. As he says in this video. I don't think he's gone soft at all. I don't think he's ever quoted Star Wars before, but in pre-cancer days he quoted Family Guy. :-)
@YourBrainOnReligion No, I had an ulterior motive for doing that. I was going to post a link to your video somewhere else. I've seen on Reddit that you can post links to Youtube videos, and have them start midway through the video. I was experimenting to see how its done. I thought it might be by adding the time to a comment and then copying the link it makes. Result, negative.
@YourBrainOnReligion Yes it is. An intro longer than 5sec on YouTube simply sucks donkey ass. YouTube is a fast, efficient medium. 16 seconds are an internity.
@amjan Clearly you failed at math in school. 3 minutes = 180 seconds, minus 3 seconds = 173 seconds. 16 seconds is not 10% nor does it matter if it were 10%, it's 16 fucking seconds.
I can't believe how wrong I am right there, Jesus H. Christ. My apologies. But, still.. shut up, it's 16 seconds. You spent longer than that typing your comment. :)
They knew they were walking into the lions den and did it with an almost masochistic submission....As usual Hitchens and Harris are on fire.....Theist never stand a chance with them and know it!
I watched almost the whole thing at the Jewish tv network website and the whole thing can be described very well by Dan Dennett's "murky" concept. These 2 rabbi's are the worst type of murkys in that they use the same language that everyone else uses and means one thing, to mean something different. This way they get to say ridiculous things but then distance themselves with "nuance". BAD MURKY, BAD MURKY.
Man, the Jewish guys got Harritch-slapped. HAHAHA just watched much of it and it's amazing how a human can deceive themselves so deeply and tapdance and ignore pts made my Hitch. Just wow. And hitch was right. They smile and give these fake concessions but only because now our modern morality won't allow them to kill unbelievers as they did in the past. I'm going to cry when Hitch passes away. Who will step into his shoes?
@TruthSurge Totally! I must say they were quite good sports about it though. It was one of the most enjoyable debates I'd ever watched. I might have to upload that part where Sam stops the younger Jewish guy in his tracks and was like "No, that's one move you can't use..." that was the intellectual pimp slapping moment of 2011 so far right there!!
@YourBrainOnReligion i know. I saw that part. Harris was like, wtf? Religion doesn't say that? Oh NOOOO, mutha f*****! Not on my watch, biotch! hahahhahaha he just stopped him and said MOST religious sectors believe in an afterlife WITH a resurrection and all the stuff those Jewish guys didn't want to admit. hehehhehe man, that's how it has to be. Telling it like it is and not letting them lie to everyone like they do to their constituents. God wouldn't bugger with Job to make a pt.
np. hitch is not the first and not the last. many people made same arguments over the years. for example, even me. i found nothing new in Hitchens books on religion, cause i already made same exact conclusions myself over the years contemplating on this subject. there are thousands of people in this world with same thoughts. Hitchens do not stand out cause his ideas are new (on the contrary - they were recycled over and over again), he stands out as one of the best presenters
Yes, when religion has "the power", it tends to make short process with blasphemers, but come on - Hitchens wasn't referring to these two pleasant individuals when he was saying that, and neither should you. On what ground are YOU claiming that David Wolpe would wish to gut Hitchens, but is "forced" to smile and be polite because of modern restrictions?
How cynical and douchey is that?? Did you know that Wolpe stirred up some members of his...
... religion by saying that the Exodus wasn't a historical event?
I don't know the history of liberal, skeptical Judaists - but these are certainly not the kinda guys that would go around killing people for resisting their beliefs, at any point.
The two Jews had some excellent, self-deprecating lines in this debate, btw - Jewish humour is the best! (after Hitch's, obviously) :D
"I like surprises!"
squamish4244 1 month ago
This is my single favorite clip from the Hitch. He is so eloquent here as he brings together agnosticism, dogma, burden of proof, imagination, humor, and humility.
Yowzoe 1 month ago
Referring to Star Wars: "I can quote scripture too!".
I remember my initial response to hearing him saying this while I was watching this debate, "Just when I thought I couldn't love that man's mind any more...!"
rcarass1 2 months ago
@warriorprince1010 The bible proves evolution. Clearly trying to get anything out of you proves an uphill battle that I'm not inclined to fight. Idiot.
skdjhfkdhfa 2 months ago
@warriorprince1010 Easy to throw out empty claims and just feel victorious isn't it?
Evolutionists have no data. Except transition fossils, layering, the conjoined chromosome lost from our ancestors. You're not even claiming anything loll.
skdjhfkdhfa 2 months ago
@warriorprince1010 Wow, where do I even start? "Evolutionist" would apply to nearly every single biologist, doctor and any other type of scientist who deals with lifeforms of any kind. "Ideology" cannot even apply to evolution, so I have no idea what you're even trying to say. All branches of science are the study of evidence, not "gods" of any kind. I challenge you to debate me anytime regarding evolution. Let's hear your best "refutation of evolution" ?
YourBrainOnReligion 2 months ago
@YourBrainOnReligion I see someone has his try hard pants on :)
skdjhfkdhfa 2 months ago
@warriorprince1010 You're missing the point, and deliberately, or so it would seem. "Evolutionists" is not a word, either. "Biologists" is the term I believe you're looking for.
And just for shits and giggles, what's a claim that either biologists or the theory of evolution itself has made which have been refuted?
YourBrainOnReligion 2 months ago
@warriorprince1010 Of course I have no evidence of a negative - negatives cannot be proven. How would you prove, for example, that liquid water does not exist on the sun? I just explained to you that you need to analyze the base requirements of even the simplest form of consciousness. You're basically claiming that life can exist in an immaterial form. Hopefully wording it like that alone should clue you in as to how ridiculous even humoring such a notion is. Think.
YourBrainOnReligion 3 months ago
@warriorprince1010 Sure you can. You analyze the requirements of consciousness. Is it really that complicated? You need the proper hardware (neurologically and chemically) and an energy source. Can either exist in some sort of a "soul" form? Of course not. Thus, an afterlife is scientifically impossible.
YourBrainOnReligion 3 months ago
Hitchens won't discuss the many other explanations for the afterlife, he sticks to the established religions because they are so easy to beat in a debate.
His arrogance is astounding. Does he question the developments in quantum physics that have discovered that the physical isn't solid, we just think it is, NO he doesn't he sticks to a very narrow field of reference. I just hope he doesn't wander around in a totally confused state, avoiding the light after he passes.
TelecasterLPGTop 3 months ago
@TelecasterLPGTop Are you willfully insane? First and foremost, of COURSE he understands the basics of quantum physics you mention. The fact that you'd even question the intelligence of one of the foremost debaters in modern times speaks mountains about your own lack of humility. Secondly, what does our knowledge of atoms have to do with the afterlife... AT ALL? I do not know if you're deliberately obfuscating the issue or if you're simply and quite genuinely too ignorant of it altogether.
YourBrainOnReligion 3 months ago 10
@TelecasterLPG- This is the best you got? Magical thinking and arguing a straw man? If you want to make a point then the first step is to add intelligence to any argument you attempt to make.
1111aaa2222 3 months ago
Suddenly the "Believers" become "Knowers" when it is convenient, then revert to just plain believers on Sundays. Ha!
jazzhawkus 3 months ago
I saw Hitchens yesterday in Houston accepting the Richard Dawkins Foundation. I also got his autograph. I was shocked to see him so frail. I thought from this video that he was getting better since he still has his weight and his hair was growing back.
But he was bald, much thinner and walked with a bit of a stoop.
Get well HItch!
jessc1979 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW BOOK (DONATED) FOR DEBATES AND GOVERNANCE
Topics: WINNING ARGUMENTS NOW ADDED For The Creationism-Evolutionism Debate (See Subchapter 10.2.2.), The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
etc.
TheServiceWeb 7 months ago
Comment removed
jessc1979 7 months ago
May the Hitch be with you!
KamasutraButterfly 7 months ago
May the Force be with You Hitch!
Roper122 9 months ago
Hitchslap overload! what is the name of the intro music please?
goreziad 9 months ago 2
@goreziad Squirrel Nut Zippers - It Ain't You
Link: watch?v=tuE7XXEUAfA
YourBrainOnReligion 9 months ago
@YourBrainOnReligion thank you very much :)
goreziad 9 months ago
Unlike most people on these boards, I actually liked the Jewish guys. They are pretty level headed unlike most religious nuts. They actually had a somewhat interesting and thought provoking conversation.
Gluumer 9 months ago
Darth Hitchens...
caviper1 9 months ago
Religions have no power over reason. That's a good thing.
Hornadayfan 10 months ago
A long time ago in a galaxy far... far away... the legend of The Hitch was born!
ComputerScience54 10 months ago 13
SO GOOD
supermot34 10 months ago
Maybe I'm nearding it up a little too much here but I think it was Luke Skywalker who said that to Han Solo.
CorndogMaker 10 months ago
@CorndogMaker heheh several people have said similar things... I'm not sure who is right. Was never into star wars myself.
YourBrainOnReligion 10 months ago
@YourBrainOnReligion
Well, it could've been as well the scenario Hitchens described, it wouldn't really have mattered. I'm sure he hasn't rewatched that movie 15 times anywhere in the recent past ;)
Although, now that I think about, in the movie, Luke just makes up on the spot that Leia would reward Solo for rescuing her, it's not something she promises herself - and Han says that phrase. So if anything, the accurate example would've been even more fitting ;)
twooffour 8 months ago
@CorndogMaker If you can't spell the word 'nerd' then I think it's unlikely that you're capable of 'nerding out'.
BeyondTheTreeline 9 months ago
No He is correct in saying it was Leia.
scotttebben 9 months ago
@scotttebben - Are you sure? The Scriptures, if I remember well, say Leah... I might be mistaken though.
caviper1 9 months ago
@CorndogMaker It was actually Han saying saying it to Lea.
rleeermy 8 months ago
@CorndogMaker Wasn't it obi wan kenobi acting on behalf of princess leia?
PlanetBongoSan 4 months ago
Crom.
crommunication 10 months ago
Hitch got the scripture canon wrong :D
twooffour 10 months ago
5 people are avid star wars nerds...
crush3r63 10 months ago
Limbo? LIMBO! Here's your "limbo" (send this to the Vatican):
watch?v=9jkowBtwnHM
Peace,
-Grizz
BTW: There are only two possible results after I die. Reincarnation OR NOTHING. I don't want Angel Wings ... and I already live in Las Vegas, so a little heat won't bother me.
grizzzlyjoe 10 months ago
Copyright notice on your Youtube vid- which features other people. Shithead.
wiccc1 11 months ago
@wiccc1 Are you claiming you have filed a copyright notice? If so, you need to learn what DMCA is. Try reading the notice at the beginning of the video.
YourBrainOnReligion 11 months ago
@wiccc1 tool.
benmols 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice videos this you tube world just gets bigger every day! When you have time come visit my channel!
850Nexus 11 months ago
Bradley is surprisingly coherent. Wolpe useless. Sam strong as always. Christopher, RUTHLESS :)
anananwar 11 months ago
i love Hitchens and Star wars! LOL
yamenhawit 11 months ago
OK, I can't be the only geek who noticed he was quoting Luke and not Leia...I mean, come on, how STUPID can you be?
;)
Hopeful71 11 months ago
@Hopeful71 I thought the same thing until the fourth or fifth time I watched it. He says her "envoy" asks the question who in turn is quoting Leia....the Hitch is in the details LOL....
TheEviscerus 11 months ago
@TheEviscerus
Damn....you're right. I finally thought I got one on Hitchens. :(
...although technically Luke was anything but her representative at this point. ObiWan perhaps, but not Luke.
Hopeful71 11 months ago
Where's the full debate?
dnallred 11 months ago
@dnallred See the underbar...
YourBrainOnReligion 11 months ago
haha
warcloud463 11 months ago
Nerd moment here... It was actually Luke Skywalker that said that to Han Solo, not Leia... Still love the video, Just sayin... we want the force on our side!
tireironman 11 months ago
@tireironman Glad I'm not the only one who noticed
xSolraccarloSx 11 months ago
Comment removed
CambridgeHeights 1 year ago
@CambridgeHeights He's never denied that an afterlife was possible, just that there's no proof. As he says in this video. I don't think he's gone soft at all. I don't think he's ever quoted Star Wars before, but in pre-cancer days he quoted Family Guy. :-)
davenielsen78 1 year ago
Comment removed
CambridgeHeights 1 year ago
@CambridgeHeights At least in this video he doesn't say or imply that. It's intents and purposes, btw.
davenielsen78 1 year ago
@happyidiottalk Damn, 16 seconds is too long of an intro?
YourBrainOnReligion 1 year ago 9
@YourBrainOnReligion No, I had an ulterior motive for doing that. I was going to post a link to your video somewhere else. I've seen on Reddit that you can post links to Youtube videos, and have them start midway through the video. I was experimenting to see how its done. I thought it might be by adding the time to a comment and then copying the link it makes. Result, negative.
happyidiottalk 1 year ago
@YourBrainOnReligion Yes.
davenielsen78 1 year ago
@YourBrainOnReligion Yes it is. An intro longer than 5sec on YouTube simply sucks donkey ass. YouTube is a fast, efficient medium. 16 seconds are an internity.
amjan 10 months ago
@amjan Patience, young Padawan!
Fabsun 10 months ago
@YourBrainOnReligion A 16sec intro in a 2:57 video, means it is over 10% of the actual video. That's like a Hollywood film with an 9min intro. Awful.
amjan 10 months ago
@amjan Clearly you failed at math in school. 3 minutes = 180 seconds, minus 3 seconds = 173 seconds. 16 seconds is not 10% nor does it matter if it were 10%, it's 16 fucking seconds.
YourBrainOnReligion 10 months ago
@YourBrainOnReligion 180-3=173? Stop doing drugs, dude.
amjan 10 months ago
@amjan HEY. I was DRUNK! (No really, I was...!)
I can't believe how wrong I am right there, Jesus H. Christ. My apologies. But, still.. shut up, it's 16 seconds. You spent longer than that typing your comment. :)
*walks away, tail firmly between his legs*
YourBrainOnReligion 10 months ago
They knew they were walking into the lions den and did it with an almost masochistic submission....As usual Hitchens and Harris are on fire.....Theist never stand a chance with them and know it!
rogan71 1 year ago
Hitchens is a bad-ass.
Satanos777 1 year ago
Poor dumb theists...they never stood a chance.
melowar78 1 year ago
I watched almost the whole thing at the Jewish tv network website and the whole thing can be described very well by Dan Dennett's "murky" concept. These 2 rabbi's are the worst type of murkys in that they use the same language that everyone else uses and means one thing, to mean something different. This way they get to say ridiculous things but then distance themselves with "nuance". BAD MURKY, BAD MURKY.
christo930 1 year ago
Im going next month to see him debate here in Colorado. Should be fun
dalejr88 1 year ago
@dalejr88 thoroughly jealous! any idea who he is debating?
YourBrainOnReligion 1 year ago
@YourBrainOnReligion His website says Dinesh D'Souza.
nightscape94 1 year ago
Excellent point regarding Limbo. How could it be any more clear that these religious organizations are just making shit up as they go along?
bowlsallbroken 1 year ago
Hitchowned.
Koss42 1 year ago
debating one or the other of Harris and Hitchens is trouble enough... but put both on stage and someone is gettin a beatin.
VoodooSixxx 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@VoodooSixxx "debating one or the other of Harris and Hitchens is trouble enough... but put both on stage and someone is gettin a beatin."
As Russel Peter's father said: "Somebody gonna get a-hurt real bad!"
OccamKant 1 year ago
Brilliant.
dioseolo 1 year ago
Man, the Jewish guys got Harritch-slapped. HAHAHA just watched much of it and it's amazing how a human can deceive themselves so deeply and tapdance and ignore pts made my Hitch. Just wow. And hitch was right. They smile and give these fake concessions but only because now our modern morality won't allow them to kill unbelievers as they did in the past. I'm going to cry when Hitch passes away. Who will step into his shoes?
TruthSurge 1 year ago 30
@TruthSurge Totally! I must say they were quite good sports about it though. It was one of the most enjoyable debates I'd ever watched. I might have to upload that part where Sam stops the younger Jewish guy in his tracks and was like "No, that's one move you can't use..." that was the intellectual pimp slapping moment of 2011 so far right there!!
YourBrainOnReligion 1 year ago 3
@YourBrainOnReligion i know. I saw that part. Harris was like, wtf? Religion doesn't say that? Oh NOOOO, mutha f*****! Not on my watch, biotch! hahahhahaha he just stopped him and said MOST religious sectors believe in an afterlife WITH a resurrection and all the stuff those Jewish guys didn't want to admit. hehehhehe man, that's how it has to be. Telling it like it is and not letting them lie to everyone like they do to their constituents. God wouldn't bugger with Job to make a pt.
TruthSurge 1 year ago
@TruthSurge
np. hitch is not the first and not the last. many people made same arguments over the years. for example, even me. i found nothing new in Hitchens books on religion, cause i already made same exact conclusions myself over the years contemplating on this subject. there are thousands of people in this world with same thoughts. Hitchens do not stand out cause his ideas are new (on the contrary - they were recycled over and over again), he stands out as one of the best presenters
skaloon 10 months ago
@skaloon You are right. He is a great presenter. Great deliveries and never seems unsure or stumbling for an answer.
TruthSurge 10 months ago
@TruthSurge We will still have Sam Harris.
Kougeki1000 8 months ago
@Kougeki1000 yep
TruthSurge 8 months ago
@TruthSurge
Ok, you're somewhat of a douche.
Yes, when religion has "the power", it tends to make short process with blasphemers, but come on - Hitchens wasn't referring to these two pleasant individuals when he was saying that, and neither should you. On what ground are YOU claiming that David Wolpe would wish to gut Hitchens, but is "forced" to smile and be polite because of modern restrictions?
How cynical and douchey is that?? Did you know that Wolpe stirred up some members of his...
twooffour 8 months ago
@twooffour take a reading comprehension class - please.
TruthSurge 8 months ago
@TruthSurge
Ah.
twooffour 8 months ago
@TruthSurge
... religion by saying that the Exodus wasn't a historical event?
I don't know the history of liberal, skeptical Judaists - but these are certainly not the kinda guys that would go around killing people for resisting their beliefs, at any point.
The two Jews had some excellent, self-deprecating lines in this debate, btw - Jewish humour is the best! (after Hitch's, obviously) :D
twooffour 8 months ago
very good video. thank you for the upload sir.
TheBadcop69 1 year ago
Quote Star Wars - you win by default. Fact.
THEHARMONIKZ 1 year ago 2
And two more get, "Hitchslapped"!
buktomsin 1 year ago
Great upload, but the whole debate was this destructive:D
buktomsin 1 year ago
Thanks for the link. Wow, Hitchens look has changed since I saw him on the tele last. Its been a while. lol
Quoting Star Wars....classic.
mconn2112 1 year ago
wow he is dying
AEVautomatic 1 year ago
@AEVautomatic we're all dying! :)
apocalypseap 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
not if you accept the Lord Jesus Christ as your savior my brother.
AEVautomatic 1 year ago
the Hitchmeister. hahahaha always calling it like it is.
TruthSurge 1 year ago
Thanks for the debate
Jesse2K12 1 year ago