QUESTION: who is the lady who comes up when he shouts 'NOT BARKER'. i get that she is part of the chorus, but i have no idea why shes there in this scene. Albeit this version of the play has a bunch of characters metaphorically sweeping through for some odd reason or another. but still, me confused
@omnigeek13 I think she is supposed to be an employee of the insane asylum that this was set up to take place in, what with the guy in the strait jacket, and sweeney grabbing lovett's head might have been cause for the doctors to try and restrain him, but the women was like "wait, no, just watch for a moment."
I recently watched the concert version with Patti and George Hearn and I think this one is MUCH better! I know a lot of ppl won't agree with me, but I like the feeling of this one better. Plus I think the acting in this is a lot better than the concert version.
I absolutely LOVE this version - so different, contained and specific. It gives me an entirely different perspective on the lyrics and the characters. I especially like Poor Thing being done without the ballet - still has the same horrific effect for me.
The original version is wonderful - I saw it on Broadway with Len Cariou before George Hearn took over. But this reinvention has tremendous merit as well.
i love when michael is harrasing patti and she is scared out of her mind in the sweeney todd of 1979 it was so i would have to see him around halloween *shiver*
I prefer her costume in the concert version but I respect them all playing ad well as singing as it is really difficult I can say that from experience. The one thing that really annoys me though in this version is the random people in White coats can anyone explain to me the point in them in the context of the plot
@bethsillytoe The people in white coats are all the people that they have killed. I saw this live with a different cast, and it was incredible. The filmed version really does not do it justice.
@bethsillytoe Director John Doyle had set this in an asylum. All of the people except Tobias are doctor-type people. When someone dies (Pirelli, beggar woman etc) they put on a white coat. They are all looking after Tobias if you like, and they tell the same story in the same asylum every day, every week, every month, every year.... etc. So the white coats, in truth, have no relevance to the actual plot of Sweeney Todd, but they have relevance in terms of Doyle's concept of the show.
He's playing the end waaaay too soon. There are about 5 climaxes in this scene. She, on the other hand (someone I hate I should mention) is fantastic. She's kicking major ass.
I think the reason Patti says this portrayal of Mrs. Lovett is different from her concert portrayal is because it's a different version. The concert version was similar to the original production (so her portrayal is somewhat based on Angela Lansbury's), and the revival is completely different from the original, so there's a totally different portrayal.
Anyone else think this version is pretty boring? I mean, she just stands there through Worst Pies. I'm not dissing Lupone, she's brilliant, but she just seems really bland in the revival.
i feel that in this revival Lupone wasnt allowed to aff her own spell on the character as she did in the concert unfortunately and ofcourse she isnt as young as she was so she couldnt run around as much =/
@MrJabawocky Lol, this wasn't that much later than the concert, you know. I think her interpretation in the revival is much more her own than in the concert, simply because a concert isn't as rehearsed, and she, as an actress, wouldn't have the time to explore her character as she did here. There's much, much more to appreciate about Patti's performance in the revival than the 2 concerts she was in.
I agree, I miss the over-the-top physicality of the in concert performance -- although there are a lot of things about the revival version that I find to be absolutely AMAZING.
As far as I understand, the revival had a backdrop of being set in a mental hospital and being performed by the patients. The random person is supposed to be a stand-by nurse of sorts who also plays Pirelli.
i agree. I saw this live, and have the concert DVD with her and George and I feel like that just pulls it together. Neil Patrick Harris doesn't hurt anything either... :)
@randomerqueen agreed. She is much funnier in the other version. Probably the director had her tone down the humor in this version to fit with the style of the piece. But she is, as always, incredible. :D
that is actually a girl....who plays pirelli. the whole concept of this show is that toby goes to an insane asylum...and the show starts with him and the other inmates attending (telling) the tale of sweeney todd. That ladie would be a keeper of the inmates to make sure that none of the crazy people telling the story hurt each other.
Dude, they're bursting into song like it's the most natural thing in the world, and you're having trouble with the fact that there's no literal PIE? It's called suspension of disbelief, and it's part of going to the theatre.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
but c'mon i mean how hard is it for them to actually put an food item? its broadway, if they can make someone rise into the air and simulate flying, im sure they can use a real pie. there was a real pie in the original version, which is way hardcore better than this one.
Not Even. Most productions since the original have taken to mime the pies, even Sondheim has said it works better that way since it's all in their heads, the idea of what people taste like
You don't get it. There's NOT SUPPOSED to be an actual pie. That's the whole idea with the revival.
It's not that they couldn't make the pie or get it for the show, it was the creative choice. Pantomime. It makes the show alot more creative, & forces you to think more.
@dlweiss this version was to make the audience believe they are watching residents of an insane asylum putting on a little "skit" for the doctors, nurses, families, ect.
The reason the woman runs forward at 5:30 is to "protect" Patti. This entire production is meant to look like the members of an insane asylum are putting on a production - hence the straight-jackets and people in white coats standing around watching.
yea.... i shudda explain myself better..... I take people just like bella from twilight (one is jacob...and the other her jacob, even if they are the same people... :) so by patti... i mean when she performed in the San Francisco concert.... its complicated :)
Michael Cerveris, Patti Lupone, and John Doyle (the director) are all extremely talented and I love all three of them.
However, I just could not bring myself to like this revival. The cast-orchestra combination worked with "Company" since it's a concept show but it just sort of ruins Sweeney : /
I agree that this is Patti LuPone's worst performance (not bad, but it could've been better) but she did so much better in the 2001 "Sweeney Todd in Concert".
Once you get passed the seriously dodgy English accents (let alone the East End accents!), this is such a great recording of one of my favourite shows.
The director probably wanted a toned down version to define her character better... which is a real shame, because she can be so much better than she was in this.
I agree with cooldude2040! The concert was performed at the Avery Fisher Hall at the Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts complex in New York City. That theatre is huge and holds 2,738 seats and a massive concert stage. To be able to vocally embrace that space, an actor must be more strong. Plus, this is an amature video, so the sound quality is not perfect!
this is probably one of the best revivals ever done on broadway!!! i saw it in Atlanta and it was absolutely amazing!!! and it could have only been better in NY!!!
I would love to see the rest of this, but seeing they havent got the dvd of it. So i just have to wait and see if you upload the others, if you have them i mean.
Do you not have the rest of this play?? If you do PLEASE could you upload it? I know it might get deleted, but could you not say who owns the rights or something like that? Even if it does get deleted I want a chance to watch it again. :(
This is intentional. John wanted no pauses for applauses because the story is meant to be one large piece. It also keeps the tension built up inside the audience members so they are on the edge of their seats constantly. I felt this way when I saw a touring production a while ago: I desperately needed some sort of relief, but couldn't get it until the very end of the first act and at the end of the show.
It's not suppose to. This is the way Stephen Sondheim originally planned Sweeney Todd to be: bare bones, minimalist, and scary. It just so happens that Hal Prince had an "epic" production in mind. You need to remember that theatre is to pose questions, not answer them. Use your imagination. Listen to the lyrics. Question why "blah" actor is playing "blah" instrument. There are reasons why John Doyle tells his actors to do a certain thing at a certain time.
I totally agree with tinytimton! Seeing Stephen Sondheim's Sweeney Todd live in a theatrical venue is scary and even intimidating at moments. If you don't want to use your brain and imagination go and see a movie!
The unique thing about this production is that the actors themselves play the instruments of the orchestra. The person in the white coat with the accordian plays Perelli, but when she's not needed as a character, she stands over to one side playing the accodian/flute as it's needed in the piece.
Do you see the pianist to the back at the keyboard? That guy's there for the same reason.
^^also, the actors play inmates in an insane asylum (they're not really sweeney and mrs. lovett, they just think they are), and the woman in the white coat is an orderly, making sure inmates don't hurt themselves. (at least i think that's what it is)
Yeah, you're correct. When I saw the touring production I asked the woman playing Pirelli what she was doing in that scene and she told me almost exactly what you just said.
Barbershops were the drop-in clinics of their day, and barbers were the general physicians/dentists/surgeons. Wearing the lab coats fits the atmosphere and their occupations (whether barber, victim of a barber, or an orderly of some kind).
QUESTION: who is the lady who comes up when he shouts 'NOT BARKER'. i get that she is part of the chorus, but i have no idea why shes there in this scene. Albeit this version of the play has a bunch of characters metaphorically sweeping through for some odd reason or another. but still, me confused
omnigeek13 7 months ago
@omnigeek13 I think she is supposed to be an employee of the insane asylum that this was set up to take place in, what with the guy in the strait jacket, and sweeney grabbing lovett's head might have been cause for the doctors to try and restrain him, but the women was like "wait, no, just watch for a moment."
tennisman117 4 months ago
NO ENTRANCE APPLAUSE FOR THE LUPONE?
EliseWhatever 8 months ago 10
I recently watched the concert version with Patti and George Hearn and I think this one is MUCH better! I know a lot of ppl won't agree with me, but I like the feeling of this one better. Plus I think the acting in this is a lot better than the concert version.
streisandgarlandlvr 9 months ago
Could you please post the vid with Mirelli's Miracle Elixir?? I wanna see Patti play the Tuba!! lol
streisandgarlandlvr 9 months ago
@streisandgarlandlvr Sorry Pirelli's!! lol
streisandgarlandlvr 9 months ago
Could you please post the one with Mirelli's Miracle Elixer?? I wanna see Patti play the Tuba!! lol
streisandgarlandlvr 9 months ago
I absolutely LOVE this version - so different, contained and specific. It gives me an entirely different perspective on the lyrics and the characters. I especially like Poor Thing being done without the ballet - still has the same horrific effect for me.
The original version is wonderful - I saw it on Broadway with Len Cariou before George Hearn took over. But this reinvention has tremendous merit as well.
farsidesoprano 10 months ago
Any plans on reposting the full show?
13Superkitsune 1 year ago
omg, i really didnt like how minimalistic poor thing was, but when he grabs lovett's head i almost wet myself!
omnigeek13 1 year ago
Is it just me or does Sweeney look like Lord Voldemort
AngelusSpkGrrl 1 year ago 5
@AngelusSpkGrrl OMG THAT WAS MY FIRST THOUGHT!!!!!
MusicFeedsYourSoul 1 year ago
Is so simply! I prefere the original production by Harold Prince. But the cast is great!
MrPoto00 1 year ago
I HATE THIS VERSION!
MrPoto00 1 year ago
@MrPoto00 Why?
Gikl27 1 year ago
I am just so attached to George. It's hard for me to like any other Sweeney , though this guy isn't too bad I admit.
kristinadiane 1 year ago
i love when michael is harrasing patti and she is scared out of her mind in the sweeney todd of 1979 it was so i would have to see him around halloween *shiver*
broadwayloverny10 1 year ago
Go Patti
TheDeltaNu 1 year ago
She sounds so sad... I like Angela's world-weary, slap-happy Mrs. Lovett better.
cygnusXhaust 1 year ago
This guy is no George Hearn...
lisambofoh 1 year ago
I prefer her costume in the concert version but I respect them all playing ad well as singing as it is really difficult I can say that from experience. The one thing that really annoys me though in this version is the random people in White coats can anyone explain to me the point in them in the context of the plot
bethsillytoe 1 year ago
@bethsillytoe The people in white coats are all the people that they have killed. I saw this live with a different cast, and it was incredible. The filmed version really does not do it justice.
TheOne2828 1 year ago
@bethsillytoe Director John Doyle had set this in an asylum. All of the people except Tobias are doctor-type people. When someone dies (Pirelli, beggar woman etc) they put on a white coat. They are all looking after Tobias if you like, and they tell the same story in the same asylum every day, every week, every month, every year.... etc. So the white coats, in truth, have no relevance to the actual plot of Sweeney Todd, but they have relevance in terms of Doyle's concept of the show.
fountainchain126 1 year ago
i just wonder how patti can sing the notes as if it were the easiest song in the world.
that's just unbelievable. O_O i just adore this woman!
qermanFreak 1 year ago
He's playing the end waaaay too soon. There are about 5 climaxes in this scene. She, on the other hand (someone I hate I should mention) is fantastic. She's kicking major ass.
MrActor123456789 1 year ago
I think the reason Patti says this portrayal of Mrs. Lovett is different from her concert portrayal is because it's a different version. The concert version was similar to the original production (so her portrayal is somewhat based on Angela Lansbury's), and the revival is completely different from the original, so there's a totally different portrayal.
FamGuyFreak100 1 year ago 4
Wow! I love the spin that they took on it!
jgar6 1 year ago
Anyone else think this version is pretty boring? I mean, she just stands there through Worst Pies. I'm not dissing Lupone, she's brilliant, but she just seems really bland in the revival.
redsteelchair 1 year ago
i feel that in this revival Lupone wasnt allowed to aff her own spell on the character as she did in the concert unfortunately and ofcourse she isnt as young as she was so she couldnt run around as much =/
MrJabawocky 1 year ago
@MrJabawocky Lol, this wasn't that much later than the concert, you know. I think her interpretation in the revival is much more her own than in the concert, simply because a concert isn't as rehearsed, and she, as an actress, wouldn't have the time to explore her character as she did here. There's much, much more to appreciate about Patti's performance in the revival than the 2 concerts she was in.
boynamedalexxx 1 year ago
I agree, I miss the over-the-top physicality of the in concert performance -- although there are a lot of things about the revival version that I find to be absolutely AMAZING.
Samjew 1 year ago 2
who is the random person supporting mrs. lovett? Shouldn't be in the scene...Just causing problems.
crimsontearslikerain 2 years ago
As far as I understand, the revival had a backdrop of being set in a mental hospital and being performed by the patients. The random person is supposed to be a stand-by nurse of sorts who also plays Pirelli.
4purgie2 1 year ago 2
Comment removed
Phoenix9109 2 years ago
Hmmm..I like LuPone as Lovett but I much prefer the version of her with George Hearn.
randomerqueen 2 years ago 16
I agree I loved her in that version, that's my favorite version of all of the Sweeney version and she is my favorite Mrs. Lovett along side Helena
csi3willows 2 years ago
i agree. I saw this live, and have the concert DVD with her and George and I feel like that just pulls it together. Neil Patrick Harris doesn't hurt anything either... :)
broadwaybabi91 2 years ago
@randomerqueen agreed. She is much funnier in the other version. Probably the director had her tone down the humor in this version to fit with the style of the piece. But she is, as always, incredible. :D
LoftierThanMine 1 year ago
@randomerqueen Agreed, although I adore Cerveris. I think part of it is the orchestrations and the different key that it's in.
tomatoherb 7 months ago
is this supposed to be a modern revival of Sweeney todd cuz I don't like it very much..
thatnylesguy 2 years ago
I honestly think the reason I don't like the revival is Patti Lupone's wig. It just bothers me.
bonsterthemonster 2 years ago
ahahahaha
greentyce 2 years ago
I agree I like the red hair she had in the concert version
csi3willows 2 years ago 6
Michael Cerveris confuses me in this part, I feel like he over exaggerates some lines, but isn't loud enough on others.
WWEQAF 2 years ago
Actor's interpretation. He is a classically trained actor. And he is really compelling in anything he does...
In my opinion.
Bradtrupp 2 years ago 4
the reasons hes angry with her is the fact shes not dead and mrs luvett lied to her
118chazzy 2 years ago
but that's not till the end
Bluebaritone 2 years ago
why is sweeney mad at mrs. lovett, its not her fault his wife is dead.
Bluebaritone 2 years ago
he's angry at society and all of mankid
generaldeejee 2 years ago
LOL!
WalrusInATopHat 2 years ago
just because she calls him Benjamin Barker.
Ryuzaki40 2 years ago
Why was that guy in the white coat standing behind Patti (the one that was playing the accordian)?
What was he doing?
1037pm 2 years ago
that is actually a girl....who plays pirelli. the whole concept of this show is that toby goes to an insane asylum...and the show starts with him and the other inmates attending (telling) the tale of sweeney todd. That ladie would be a keeper of the inmates to make sure that none of the crazy people telling the story hurt each other.
magicmike96 2 years ago
Patti Lupone is a fantastic actor and singer, but I don't particularly like her for the role of Ms. Lovett. :/
But the show was still great. :D
Studio23Machinimas 2 years ago
Where are the rest of the videos??
bacheek 2 years ago
if you want to trade the whole show for something let me know. send me a message =]
magicmike96 2 years ago
Do ypu still have any copies?
ikielove 2 years ago
yes i have this whole show..send me a message with your info or whatever and we can talk about trading and whatnot =]
magicmike96 2 years ago
the observer :D
frumpy62 2 years ago
LMFAAO i thought the same exact thingg!
burythetv 2 years ago
I think Patti LuPone has a nice ass!
Usemeordie 2 years ago 3
it's padding - they wanted to make her more voluptuous lol
Raven9940 2 years ago
Comment removed
Usemeordie 2 years ago
wow...that scene after Poor Thing was INTENSE!!!
Safuza 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I LOVE HER
but she got fat in 2006
MRxWONDERland 2 years ago
why is there no actual pie? thats dumb
hugosanchez0513 2 years ago
Dude, they're bursting into song like it's the most natural thing in the world, and you're having trouble with the fact that there's no literal PIE? It's called suspension of disbelief, and it's part of going to the theatre.
dlweiss 2 years ago 56
This comment has received too many negative votes show
but c'mon i mean how hard is it for them to actually put an food item? its broadway, if they can make someone rise into the air and simulate flying, im sure they can use a real pie. there was a real pie in the original version, which is way hardcore better than this one.
hugosanchez0513 2 years ago
you have to go with the concept man, its a stripped down version, only the bare-essentials are used
epetillo91 2 years ago 2
Not Even. Most productions since the original have taken to mime the pies, even Sondheim has said it works better that way since it's all in their heads, the idea of what people taste like
Raven9940 2 years ago 3
You don't get it. There's NOT SUPPOSED to be an actual pie. That's the whole idea with the revival.
It's not that they couldn't make the pie or get it for the show, it was the creative choice. Pantomime. It makes the show alot more creative, & forces you to think more.
The whole show is stripped down for this effect.
boynamedalexxx 2 years ago
@dlweiss this version was to make the audience believe they are watching residents of an insane asylum putting on a little "skit" for the doctors, nurses, families, ect.
smalltree23 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
They should have cast a real actress, not Patti.
LEGALLYbroadway 2 years ago
Who is the lady in the white coat at 5:30 to 6:15?
She looks like she's "spotting" Patti so she doesn't fall over...Does anyone know who she is and what she's doing?
LoudAustralian 2 years ago
Good question, she spots patti it looks like then stands back, maybe so nothing falls off the stage?
emoguysrhot94 2 years ago
The reason the woman runs forward at 5:30 is to "protect" Patti. This entire production is meant to look like the members of an insane asylum are putting on a production - hence the straight-jackets and people in white coats standing around watching.
dlweiss 2 years ago
Really?
PonyboyPlusJane 2 years ago
I LUV PATTI!!!!!!
GuilleCarvajal 2 years ago
but she broke the key rule of the show must go on no matter what!
she therefore sucks!!!!!!
elliemacyo 2 years ago
that was a thing about patti btw
elliemacyo 2 years ago
Sweeney reminds me of uh, the guy from Hitman.
TackyVintage 2 years ago
YEAH!
emoguysrhot94 2 years ago
she is my idol!
broadway0987 2 years ago 3
i love how she enunciates haha
aasjb4ever 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
rory1494 2 years ago
If by "Patti" you mean "Patti Lupone"... you do know that this Mrs. Lovett *is* Patti Lupone, right?
andrael 2 years ago
yea.... i shudda explain myself better..... I take people just like bella from twilight (one is jacob...and the other her jacob, even if they are the same people... :) so by patti... i mean when she performed in the San Francisco concert.... its complicated :)
rory1494 2 years ago
yeah, i prefer her in the concert...
richsmi1 2 years ago
lol this is Patti...
Heavily9 2 years ago
read the comment i left to andrael... that should make more sence... :) or maybe not...
rory1494 2 years ago
Wait, Pirelleli was played by a girl? O.o
Thnikkafan 2 years ago
Wow... the scene after "Poor Thing" is BRILLIANT... totally blew me away. Well directed and well played!
filmjedi 2 years ago 2
Michael Cerveris, Patti Lupone, and John Doyle (the director) are all extremely talented and I love all three of them.
However, I just could not bring myself to like this revival. The cast-orchestra combination worked with "Company" since it's a concept show but it just sort of ruins Sweeney : /
AtLastOnTheGround 2 years ago 2
i dont like him bald
PonyboyPlusJane 2 years ago 2
i like angela better
PonyboyPlusJane 2 years ago 3
I agree that this is Patti LuPone's worst performance (not bad, but it could've been better) but she did so much better in the 2001 "Sweeney Todd in Concert".
Anyone agree?
alyness33 2 years ago 4
i agree i also dont like her hair in this one
punkylbrewsterlvb 2 years ago
yeah I kinda agree. I still love Patti!
alyness33 2 years ago 2
Once you get passed the seriously dodgy English accents (let alone the East End accents!), this is such a great recording of one of my favourite shows.
rebrebekah 3 years ago 2
i love the 2000 one better. i love abnoxious patti
midgetashley 3 years ago 2
A neat production, but why does Patti sound so much weaker than she did in 2001 in the Concert with Hearn?
Metalvirus 3 years ago 3
The director probably wanted a toned down version to define her character better... which is a real shame, because she can be so much better than she was in this.
cooldude2040 3 years ago 3
I agree with cooldude2040! The concert was performed at the Avery Fisher Hall at the Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts complex in New York City. That theatre is huge and holds 2,738 seats and a massive concert stage. To be able to vocally embrace that space, an actor must be more strong. Plus, this is an amature video, so the sound quality is not perfect!
macrent2 3 years ago
she sounds better
cheesenedd 3 years ago
Oh God I love her! I got see these guys on Broadway during their Previews. I so happy. I love Michael and Patti.
MichaelCrawfordsFan 3 years ago 7
es genal pero patty lupone es muy buena cantante pero muy caderona
bao690925 3 years ago
where's the rest?
TheSoulMan8 3 years ago
this is probably one of the best revivals ever done on broadway!!! i saw it in Atlanta and it was absolutely amazing!!! and it could have only been better in NY!!!
sonofplunder69 3 years ago
I would love to see the rest of this, but seeing they havent got the dvd of it. So i just have to wait and see if you upload the others, if you have them i mean.
eponlindsey 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I don't like this version at all, they are all good, but it was terrible.
kyleisamadman 3 years ago
What don't you like about it?
broadwaybound4eva 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
It's just that the staging was horrible, and that they were playing the instruments on stage, and I would be confused it I was seeing this in person.
kyleisamadman 3 years ago
can u upload johanna? please
elphabasfriend001 3 years ago
this one makes me sad cuz it looks like he was gunna hurt patti.. and u NEVER HURT PATTI!!!
tatyrules12 3 years ago 11
ha!! i hear that!!!
cluelessrachel 3 years ago
Aye! Hear hear!
peppersausen 2 years ago
Where's the rest of it,You only have the first, second ,and the tweleth
skullfan135 3 years ago 2
I was wondering the same thing, but judging by the comments on his channel, the whole thing WAS up, but then Equity had it taken down . :(
broadwaybound4eva 3 years ago
If you have the rest of this play PLEASE could you upload it?
MUSICALANGIE 3 years ago
the whole thing IS uploaded....
MateoG7788 3 years ago
Patti lupone is a babe
Kinnybetch 3 years ago 5
Do you not have the rest of this play?? If you do PLEASE could you upload it? I know it might get deleted, but could you not say who owns the rights or something like that? Even if it does get deleted I want a chance to watch it again. :(
TheOne2828 3 years ago
Can someone explain how the concept of this new production works basically please? Also the little white coffin?
musicaldudepeter 3 years ago
white coffin = sweeney's old life
everyone is always on stage and they are either singing acting or playing an instrument...sometimes all three
cbgbs93 3 years ago 2
The white coffin is a symbolic representation of his daughter., Johanna.
tinytimton 3 years ago 2
I hate how the mash all the songs together. You can't show appreciation of the song if it never ends. :/
bah1234 3 years ago
Just because the audience dosen't get the chance to clap, means they can't appreciate it?
broadwaybound4eva 3 years ago
Am I the only one who agrees with you, I mean I love this version as much as the original, but you can't clap for them in the songs.
TheQuestionBoy4 3 years ago
This is intentional. John wanted no pauses for applauses because the story is meant to be one large piece. It also keeps the tension built up inside the audience members so they are on the edge of their seats constantly. I felt this way when I saw a touring production a while ago: I desperately needed some sort of relief, but couldn't get it until the very end of the first act and at the end of the show.
tinytimton 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I hate this production, it doesn't give the atmosphere at all...
RickvanVeldhuizen 3 years ago
It's not suppose to. This is the way Stephen Sondheim originally planned Sweeney Todd to be: bare bones, minimalist, and scary. It just so happens that Hal Prince had an "epic" production in mind. You need to remember that theatre is to pose questions, not answer them. Use your imagination. Listen to the lyrics. Question why "blah" actor is playing "blah" instrument. There are reasons why John Doyle tells his actors to do a certain thing at a certain time.
tinytimton 3 years ago 24
I totally agree with tinytimton! Seeing Stephen Sondheim's Sweeney Todd live in a theatrical venue is scary and even intimidating at moments. If you don't want to use your brain and imagination go and see a movie!
macrent2 3 years ago 8
Beautifully put. :)
soldierdifortuna2 3 years ago 2
Can you maybe try to re-upload the rest of the show?
sdrhead 3 years ago
I'm not sure if there's much point, if they're just going to delete everything again or ban me for repeated violations. :/
ihasacoffin 3 years ago
Can you at least upload Epiphany?
Thaychris 3 years ago 4
oh man :( i wish they still had the rest of this play >:(
deathowner 3 years ago 4
And I have to say while some of the choices John Doyle makes aren't my cup of tea, I love how he directs his actors.
MissBroadwayDork 3 years ago 2
My favorite delivery of WPIL I've seen yet.
MissBroadwayDork 3 years ago 4
what happened to the other 16 parts?!
WJC007 3 years ago 2
whats goin on with the person in the white coat??
ruffridah 3 years ago
The unique thing about this production is that the actors themselves play the instruments of the orchestra. The person in the white coat with the accordian plays Perelli, but when she's not needed as a character, she stands over to one side playing the accodian/flute as it's needed in the piece.
Do you see the pianist to the back at the keyboard? That guy's there for the same reason.
wmasque 3 years ago
^^also, the actors play inmates in an insane asylum (they're not really sweeney and mrs. lovett, they just think they are), and the woman in the white coat is an orderly, making sure inmates don't hurt themselves. (at least i think that's what it is)
ilovekakairu 3 years ago 4
Yeah, you're correct. When I saw the touring production I asked the woman playing Pirelli what she was doing in that scene and she told me almost exactly what you just said.
ryanthemusical 3 years ago
Yes indeed. this whole thing was preformed by the inmates at Arkham Asylum, and the orderly's play in to keep them under control.
Sanguwich 3 years ago 2
how is the audience supposed to figure that out? thats so weird
strongsad14 3 years ago
That's funny, but I think she's just supposed to help out (but that really is hilarious)
TheQuestionBoy4 3 years ago
Barbershops were the drop-in clinics of their day, and barbers were the general physicians/dentists/surgeons. Wearing the lab coats fits the atmosphere and their occupations (whether barber, victim of a barber, or an orderly of some kind).
faustinesea 3 years ago
just got the cd! fantastic!
jackhurst85 3 years ago
<3 Love.
bananabasket 3 years ago