What a wonderful and authentic texture in this interpretation. JSB is the opitome of what I call "Organized Chaos" Notes everywhere but at the same time right where they need to be.
Bach is certainly one of my favorite composers, but I just never can seem to like the harpsichord. I understand that's the way it was written, in a time before there was a piano, but seriously, I prefer the piano.
The double bass, or cello(?)in the middle looks pretty unusual, or is it just older than modern instrument, cause i saw pre-1800 models of double basses, can anyone tell me ?
¡Bárbaro!.Koopman,sentado al teclado y los seis músicos alrederor creando belleza,en un concepto enteramente barroco.Reproduciendo el momento único e irrepetible de la lectura intensa e inmensa de JSB.
I love how Bach's music always seems to silence all of these comments - no matter how right or wrong they might be. For the "experts" out there: don't boast your knowledge, it may push away new Bach's lovers. For the "beginners" out there: a true knowledge and understanding of Bach's music takes years. Youtube could be a formidable medium for learning about anything new. It's up to the "expert" not to sound like blabbering asses when "imparting their knowledge and blessings" on the newcomers...
putting "experts," "beginners," and "imparting their knowledge and blessings" in "quotes" adds absolutely "nothing" to bersa888's "arguments" or lack of them
OK. It seems that based on what the Broccoli Man has posted, I'd passed on a folkish legend that Fred the Great was the patron of this suite-concerto. However, he needs to read Adorno on rescuing Bach from his devotees, and fart in a bottle and paint it, after eating a fart sandwich.
A sort of literal mindedness reduces everything to tautology. I didn't say that this "was" a concerto. I said it has elements of concerto, and I hazarded that this was to provide a part for Great Fred. But I may have been wrong about the last factoid.
However, part of the brutalization and the moronization of the putatively learned, esp. those learned in "classical music", is their instilled inability to interpret, and oversubscription to an inappropriately excluded middle.
You said, "Perhaps Bach did not intend this to be a 'concerto for flute and orchestra'".
You did NOT say this "has elements of a concerto.
No autograph of this suite survives. Based on style alone, it dates from the Coethen period (1717-1723). Copies of the score parts - perhaps for the public concerts of the Collegium Musicum - date from 1738/39. Bach didn't meet Frederick until 1747.
That you start this indicates that your personality has been stunted by "education". You come in here and rather than advancing an interpretation, a point of view, or a poem which helps us to appreciate the beauty of the music, you show off without references.
No wonder people prefer rock and roll. They don't have to talk to people like you!
No, it's two guys who can write and think, one of whom is a bit of a pedant but has studied more than I ... to the extent that he has no real ability to listen and interpret.
Both the Broccoli-man and I are a refreshing change of pace from the usual Kyles, Kennies, and Cartmans who post here. He needs to fart in a bottle and paint it, but he's raised a valid point.
That is true. Classical music will attract a better class of people. Guy walks into a bar, and the TV is playing a video of Olivier Messaien's The End of Time, guy's going to be unusual if he stays.
So...Bach walks into a bar, humming a fugue subject and whistling the counter-subject inna two part invention. Bartender says, funny, never saw a guy could do that.
Bach says, oh yeah? S'easy. But at these prices, dis gonna be the last time. I'll have a shot, a beer, and a fart sandwich to go.
I love the authentic setting, and that beautiful harpsichord is a truly magnificent instrument! [I do find the conductor's head movements a little disturbing... but it must be a real challenge to conduct just with your head...]
I think the flute is "too quiet" because it's a Baroque transverse flute made of wood. Perhaps Bach did not intend this to be a "concerto for flute and orchestra". Perhaps he intended this to be "an orchestra piece with a strong flute role so my good buddy Frederick the Great could play".
Oops, you messed up. You wanted to post "try" but you imply that you are "trying to". I do find you very trying indeed, and viewing the suite as a suite-concerto is a better way of listening that your pedantry.
And where are our references? Remember, no wikipedia!
no es matematico, bueno si lo ves por intervalos, puede ser, pero todo son reglas de armonia tradicional, facilonas, o tambien puedes verlo con contrapunto, yo creo que en esta fue primero la armonia que el contrapunto, si te gusta el jazz conoceras la cadencia 2 5 1, en badinerie ya la analize y solo hace 2 5 1, no es que sea muy cabron, si no que, tiene la sensibilidad de un dios,
Pues si analiza el movimiento mas corto, y ademas final facilon: analice la overtura o la fuga y despues hablamos de 2 5 1. Y el jazz hace si acaso 1 5 4 1 con acordes complementarios en el 5 o 4, tampoco es gran cosa. Analice el arte de la fuga, la fuga do menor de Mozart, o la gran fuga de Beethoven, si pasa los primeros 16 compases... lo felicito ha aprendido algo de armonia.
no entendi, al final fue sarcasmo?, ademas el jazz no es que sea 1541 al final es 2 5 1, pero lo que haces es sustituto de acordes , para eso existe el intercambio modal, bueno eso existe desde el clasico, en realidad lo que cambia es el movimiento de las voces, en tradicional hay reglas en contemporanea no, y analizar no es dificil, menos clasico, lo impresionante de analizar es la belleza de llo sencillo, gracias por responder
The performance is NOT boring, NOT dry and academic, NOT overly flamboyant, but well thought out and done under Herr Koopman's guidance. I ONLY questioned the reasoning behind "one to a part" and some of you want my head on a platter. Artistic expression IS NOT about one person's dogma over another. After all, art IS in the end interpretive and not a "religious/political fanaticism". Western civilization is declining fast enough without all of us backbiting each other. SOLI DEO GLORIA.
Don't be jealous cuz he knows how to be old and live life to such a joy. Don't be jealous because he is so emotional and reactive to his work. Don't be jealous that he is not over thinking, and just living in the moment. Because you can do it too.
Indeed, and I have to restate the comment that this is not boring. Everyone has something to say about it it seems...so just open your eyes and realized that if you came all the way to make a comment, you were obviously not bored....or you would have just exited the page.
The problem is that they're playing just one to a part. I really don't understand the justification for that. Bach wrote down himself what the ideal is for the number of instruments so why settle for one to a part? That's why the harpsichord may seem too loud in this performance.
Why even think for 2 seconds about that? They tried, and they did it. Give them credit for their work. Only people who WANT to say something will say something about this...it's ridiculous. I am POSITIVE they could have found people, they are doing it on purpose for a reason. People like to try things out, and they find it fun. So just leave em alone if you wanna talk about how many people they used..chill out.
It's excellant that one can actually hear the harpsichord in this, as opposed to all those god-awful romantic style recordings completely devoid of any character with the rest of the oversized orchestra smothering the sound of the harpsichord.
Bach did not write anything down about that in regards to the orchestral suites. As with most of Bach's secular instrumental works, it is more than likely that these pieces were performed one to a part. ESPECIALLY with the solo flauto traverso in this particular suite.
The memo Bach wrote to the Leipzig council concerned the forces needed to perform concerted church music *in the Leipzig churches*, which has nothing to do with the forces he needed to perform chamber music he composed for specific ensembles at the Coethen court.
You're argument why the harpsichord "may seem to lound" is nonsense.
What about his sonatas for harpsichord and ONE violin? By your argument he should have used at least 2 violins!!!
i disagree. The harpsichord (german model here) is playing at just the right intensity to be heard clearly. We just got used to all those recordings where the harpsichord just tinkles annoingly and confusely like a tin can.
I also disagree. Koopman is in my opinion the best on Bach (ORGAN, ORCHESTRA, CHOIR, CHAMBER MUSIC et alium), and he knows vvery well what is the ideal sound effect an itensity.
It's a great performance, but the continuo is a little march-like for me. Koopman attacks the harpsichord and drowns the flautist. Excellent musicians though. :)
The BWV is correct but the suite number is 2. As usual Koopman marches ahead too fast making Bach sound like a diesel locomotive instead of bringing up the most delicate nuances and the most divine baroque music ever written. As usual he keeps jumping agitated like an over-caffeinated baboon distracting the audience with his antics.
Its a shame the sound looks like acoustic, not microphoned individually. I get lost on violins and viola sound... but still yet a great recording ang playing!
very good
louloute77470 1 month ago
this one is a bit boring - compared to (look for "sarig sela bach overture")
bachFun1 2 months ago 2
couldn't agree more
MusicAtBusiness 1 month ago
Comment removed
bachFun1 2 months ago
What a wonderful and authentic texture in this interpretation. JSB is the opitome of what I call "Organized Chaos" Notes everywhere but at the same time right where they need to be.
zerohundredthhour 3 months ago 3
bach's pieces r ever so distinguishable and as beautiful as ever
cutehearts 3 months ago in playlist Classical Music playlist
To love Bach's music is not necessary to be one expert. I can't read any notes but I really LOVE Bach and some pieces can do me to cry.
Guangxi56 9 months ago 4
Can anyone tell me if that is a younger Wilbert Hazelzet playing traverso?
2880aham 10 months ago
@2880aham Yup, that's Hazelzet alright!
rustydog1236 9 months ago
Bach is certainly one of my favorite composers, but I just never can seem to like the harpsichord. I understand that's the way it was written, in a time before there was a piano, but seriously, I prefer the piano.
Moonawrathic 11 months ago
i do not like the harpsichord, cello, or any percussion instruments
nakedBison69 9 months ago
best music of my life!
and look at them! Ton conduct witgh his head!
nikbran 11 months ago
Haha oh I see, part one of BWV 1067. Pardon me :P!
jarlaxleforever 1 year ago
If I'm not mistaken, I'm positive that this is Bach's Orchestral Suite #2, not #1 as it seems to be mislabelled.
jarlaxleforever 1 year ago
The double bass, or cello(?)in the middle looks pretty unusual, or is it just older than modern instrument, cause i saw pre-1800 models of double basses, can anyone tell me ?
Sylvain894 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
anyone know the 1st violin?
gabebe45 1 year ago
is the guy on second violin Andrew Manze???
juslopezma 1 year ago
@juslopezma No one answered you yet so I will -- yes, that's Andrew Manze on the second violin. Everyone starts out somewhere!
AML2000 4 days ago
This "orchestra" is pretty casual.
Samoriah 1 year ago
is a baroque orchestra
is not casual
alecto9322 1 year ago
@Samoriah
Nah. Thats what orchestras looked like before the romantics.
gr0mithtimon 1 year ago
The guy playing the harpsichord has clearly been to his fair share of metallica and ozzy shows
metsoforte 1 year ago 8
It`s My favorit
tomsyou 1 year ago
amazing!! thank you whoever posted this...
Natashenka91 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Great Music youtube.com/watch?v=2i3Ua1gQLmQ
Great Music youtube.com/watch?v=2i3Ua1gQLmQ
TheSensationalMusic 1 year ago
Can you make a playlist of these recordings?
Kan2209 1 year ago
@Kan2209
Yes, I already did...
Filadelfiagemeente 1 year ago
It's very interesting recording
andreavezzoli 1 year ago
Wonderful recording!
flutist826 1 year ago
¡Bárbaro!.Koopman,sentado al teclado y los seis músicos alrederor creando belleza,en un concepto enteramente barroco.Reproduciendo el momento único e irrepetible de la lectura intensa e inmensa de JSB.
paradoxicus 2 years ago
I love how Bach's music always seems to silence all of these comments - no matter how right or wrong they might be. For the "experts" out there: don't boast your knowledge, it may push away new Bach's lovers. For the "beginners" out there: a true knowledge and understanding of Bach's music takes years. Youtube could be a formidable medium for learning about anything new. It's up to the "expert" not to sound like blabbering asses when "imparting their knowledge and blessings" on the newcomers...
bersa888 2 years ago 32
Calma please!!! i find this recording extremly intense but really not warm, and for my taste is boring after 5 minutes....
SO where is the medium if you don't realize that the only medium in music is only yourself!
ciao
eolodiAquila 2 years ago
putting "experts," "beginners," and "imparting their knowledge and blessings" in "quotes" adds absolutely "nothing" to bersa888's "arguments" or lack of them
nakedBison69 9 months ago
@nakedBison69 : I forgot why and when I wrote the above comment. My question though is: what is your "argument"? ;-)
bersa888 9 months ago
putting "argument" in "quotes" adds absolutely "nothing" to forgetful bersa888's "arguments" or lack of them
nakedBison69 9 months ago
@nakedBison69 : :-))))
bersa888 9 months ago 2
Nice orchestra, they play very well.
JawsRequin25 2 years ago 2
A complex piece , but, beautyfuly done.
Stevenewfan 2 years ago 3
Dammit, they are good.
sormu16 2 years ago 11
Comment removed
tomsyou 2 years ago
I play this Suite for my music exam!
It's so hard but I hope I'll get a great mark!
Louison86240 2 years ago 3
"I would like to go to college and study, but I would not study music appreciation. I already like music."
- Yogi Berra
spinoza1111 2 years ago 32
@spinoza1111 lol, i took that in highschool just because i needed credits, and had i not i would have never known what my greatest passion is.
stargirlsusan 11 months ago
Based on what you said, skyline man, I'm going to go to a modern music YouTube to see if there are any cute girls.
spinoza1111 2 years ago
OK. It seems that based on what the Broccoli Man has posted, I'd passed on a folkish legend that Fred the Great was the patron of this suite-concerto. However, he needs to read Adorno on rescuing Bach from his devotees, and fart in a bottle and paint it, after eating a fart sandwich.
spinoza1111 2 years ago
Comment removed
spinoza1111 2 years ago
A sort of literal mindedness reduces everything to tautology. I didn't say that this "was" a concerto. I said it has elements of concerto, and I hazarded that this was to provide a part for Great Fred. But I may have been wrong about the last factoid.
However, part of the brutalization and the moronization of the putatively learned, esp. those learned in "classical music", is their instilled inability to interpret, and oversubscription to an inappropriately excluded middle.
spinoza1111 2 years ago
You said, "Perhaps Bach did not intend this to be a 'concerto for flute and orchestra'".
You did NOT say this "has elements of a concerto.
No autograph of this suite survives. Based on style alone, it dates from the Coethen period (1717-1723). Copies of the score parts - perhaps for the public concerts of the Collegium Musicum - date from 1738/39. Bach didn't meet Frederick until 1747.
Please provide references for your claims.
PS: No Wikipedia.
wcbroccoli 2 years ago
And as you amply demonstrate, a lack of any substantial rebuttal manifests in defensive posturing and pretentious gibberish
wcbroccoli 2 years ago
just quit with all the sardonic tomfoolery and tell him to go eat a fart sandwich!
tasha122277 2 years ago
That you start this indicates that your personality has been stunted by "education". You come in here and rather than advancing an interpretation, a point of view, or a poem which helps us to appreciate the beauty of the music, you show off without references.
No wonder people prefer rock and roll. They don't have to talk to people like you!
Eat a fart sandwich.
spinoza1111 2 years ago
A case of the pot calling the kettle black?
n14e5o15 2 years ago
No, it's two guys who can write and think, one of whom is a bit of a pedant but has studied more than I ... to the extent that he has no real ability to listen and interpret.
Both the Broccoli-man and I are a refreshing change of pace from the usual Kyles, Kennies, and Cartmans who post here. He needs to fart in a bottle and paint it, but he's raised a valid point.
spinoza1111 2 years ago
ain't be no pedants 'round my neck of the woods. I like classical music videos on here, people who comment actually have some intellectual prowess.
skyline44512 2 years ago
That is true. Classical music will attract a better class of people. Guy walks into a bar, and the TV is playing a video of Olivier Messaien's The End of Time, guy's going to be unusual if he stays.
So...Bach walks into a bar, humming a fugue subject and whistling the counter-subject inna two part invention. Bartender says, funny, never saw a guy could do that.
Bach says, oh yeah? S'easy. But at these prices, dis gonna be the last time. I'll have a shot, a beer, and a fart sandwich to go.
spinoza1111 2 years ago 2
I love the authentic setting, and that beautiful harpsichord is a truly magnificent instrument! [I do find the conductor's head movements a little disturbing... but it must be a real challenge to conduct just with your head...]
margyoseven 2 years ago
I think the flute is "too quiet" because it's a Baroque transverse flute made of wood. Perhaps Bach did not intend this to be a "concerto for flute and orchestra". Perhaps he intended this to be "an orchestra piece with a strong flute role so my good buddy Frederick the Great could play".
spinoza1111 3 years ago
This NOT a concerto for flute and orchestra.
It's a suite of dances for flute and strings.
This piece has nothing to do with Frederick the Great, who was only a child when it was written.
Bach never worked for Frederick. The only thing he wrote for his was the Musical Offering, and it was not commissioned; he was just showing off.
wcbroccoli 2 years ago
Thanks for clearing everything up, Mr. Broccoli. However, could we have some references?
PS: No wikipedia.
spinoza1111 2 years ago
Comment removed
wcbroccoli 2 years ago
Oops, you messed up. You wanted to post "try" but you imply that you are "trying to". I do find you very trying indeed, and viewing the suite as a suite-concerto is a better way of listening that your pedantry.
And where are our references? Remember, no wikipedia!
spinoza1111 2 years ago
Comment removed
wcbroccoli 2 years ago
Try reading the score and Bach Dokumente and a little history.
wcbroccoli 2 years ago
Claro,así se puede.El bajo-conductor es Ton Koopman.¡Maravillosa versión!
debartzen 3 years ago
splendid
firebreathone2 3 years ago
i heard this live in a church. wonderful!
Rubinstein007 3 years ago
es un mounstruo, es un matematico de clase es impresionante bach es el maestro!!!!
flamencoscar8 3 years ago
no es matematico, bueno si lo ves por intervalos, puede ser, pero todo son reglas de armonia tradicional, facilonas, o tambien puedes verlo con contrapunto, yo creo que en esta fue primero la armonia que el contrapunto, si te gusta el jazz conoceras la cadencia 2 5 1, en badinerie ya la analize y solo hace 2 5 1, no es que sea muy cabron, si no que, tiene la sensibilidad de un dios,
themagicalchemist 3 years ago
Pues si analiza el movimiento mas corto, y ademas final facilon: analice la overtura o la fuga y despues hablamos de 2 5 1. Y el jazz hace si acaso 1 5 4 1 con acordes complementarios en el 5 o 4, tampoco es gran cosa. Analice el arte de la fuga, la fuga do menor de Mozart, o la gran fuga de Beethoven, si pasa los primeros 16 compases... lo felicito ha aprendido algo de armonia.
andipipo 3 years ago
no entendi, al final fue sarcasmo?, ademas el jazz no es que sea 1541 al final es 2 5 1, pero lo que haces es sustituto de acordes , para eso existe el intercambio modal, bueno eso existe desde el clasico, en realidad lo que cambia es el movimiento de las voces, en tradicional hay reglas en contemporanea no, y analizar no es dificil, menos clasico, lo impresionante de analizar es la belleza de llo sencillo, gracias por responder
themagicalchemist 3 years ago
The performance is NOT boring, NOT dry and academic, NOT overly flamboyant, but well thought out and done under Herr Koopman's guidance. I ONLY questioned the reasoning behind "one to a part" and some of you want my head on a platter. Artistic expression IS NOT about one person's dogma over another. After all, art IS in the end interpretive and not a "religious/political fanaticism". Western civilization is declining fast enough without all of us backbiting each other. SOLI DEO GLORIA.
NorbertZF 3 years ago
Comment removed
bersa888 2 years ago
Don't be jealous cuz he knows how to be old and live life to such a joy. Don't be jealous because he is so emotional and reactive to his work. Don't be jealous that he is not over thinking, and just living in the moment. Because you can do it too.
BugzLooney 3 years ago
Indeed, and I have to restate the comment that this is not boring. Everyone has something to say about it it seems...so just open your eyes and realized that if you came all the way to make a comment, you were obviously not bored....or you would have just exited the page.
BugzLooney 3 years ago
The problem is that they're playing just one to a part. I really don't understand the justification for that. Bach wrote down himself what the ideal is for the number of instruments so why settle for one to a part? That's why the harpsichord may seem too loud in this performance.
NorbertZF 3 years ago
Why even think for 2 seconds about that? They tried, and they did it. Give them credit for their work. Only people who WANT to say something will say something about this...it's ridiculous. I am POSITIVE they could have found people, they are doing it on purpose for a reason. People like to try things out, and they find it fun. So just leave em alone if you wanna talk about how many people they used..chill out.
BugzLooney 3 years ago
It's excellant that one can actually hear the harpsichord in this, as opposed to all those god-awful romantic style recordings completely devoid of any character with the rest of the oversized orchestra smothering the sound of the harpsichord.
HARMONICO101 3 years ago 5
Bach did not write anything down about that in regards to the orchestral suites. As with most of Bach's secular instrumental works, it is more than likely that these pieces were performed one to a part. ESPECIALLY with the solo flauto traverso in this particular suite.
HARMONICO101 3 years ago
One-to-a-part is only a problem for you.
The memo Bach wrote to the Leipzig council concerned the forces needed to perform concerted church music *in the Leipzig churches*, which has nothing to do with the forces he needed to perform chamber music he composed for specific ensembles at the Coethen court.
You're argument why the harpsichord "may seem to lound" is nonsense.
What about his sonatas for harpsichord and ONE violin? By your argument he should have used at least 2 violins!!!
wcbroccoli 2 years ago
Actually, the cello, the violone and left hand of the harpsichord are all playing the same line or doubling it at the lower 8ve.
wcbroccoli 2 years ago
Excellent performance, one of the best in French style.
coyote20010 4 years ago
Hapsicord too loud. The allegro is very well done!
BSA2417666 4 years ago
i disagree. The harpsichord (german model here) is playing at just the right intensity to be heard clearly. We just got used to all those recordings where the harpsichord just tinkles annoingly and confusely like a tin can.
adaswet 4 years ago 7
Agreed. I am always annoyed when the harpsichord is all-but-inaudible, especially in Bach's music.
kageotaku 3 years ago
i know what you mean - if i can't hear the harpsichord i want to just beat the conductor to death with a violin
MotorolaSurfer 3 years ago
Do you know the meaning of "basso continuo"?
The harpsichord part is not an obbligato part.
Apart, from figure bass notation, Bach did not compose the harpsichord part you hearing.
The left hand merely doubles the bass line and the right hand improvises a more-or-less chordal accompaniment
from figures.
wcbroccoli 2 years ago
I also disagree. Koopman is in my opinion the best on Bach (ORGAN, ORCHESTRA, CHOIR, CHAMBER MUSIC et alium), and he knows vvery well what is the ideal sound effect an itensity.
pjps1234 3 years ago
Perhaps you don't realize that the left hand part of the harpsichord is merely doubling the bass line played by the cello and violone.
wcbroccoli 2 years ago
It's a great performance, but the continuo is a little march-like for me. Koopman attacks the harpsichord and drowns the flautist. Excellent musicians though. :)
Rik77 4 years ago
Is this boring? No chance. This group plays with such spirit and feeling so it is no way boring at all.
flutejansson 4 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I think the Amsterdam Baroque Orchestra must have a manifesto that states that their goal is to bore their already aging audience to death!
violashizzle 4 years ago
Is that Frederick the Great's music room at San Souci? The chandelier looks familiar, but I've never been there... VERY nice, BTW.
rustydog1236 4 years ago
well the tempo should be "Grave-Allegro" but this one seems a little bit fast at the Beginning.
shaind 4 years ago
The BWV is correct but the suite number is 2. As usual Koopman marches ahead too fast making Bach sound like a diesel locomotive instead of bringing up the most delicate nuances and the most divine baroque music ever written. As usual he keeps jumping agitated like an over-caffeinated baboon distracting the audience with his antics.
onionpizza 4 years ago
well of course suite number is 2, but the number "1" in video title seems to indicate the first part(overture) of the suite
shaind 4 years ago 2
Your comments are ironic but conceptually I think you are absolutely right. All genial details are lost.
Regarding the flutist, his sound is sooo weak, even for a baroque flute...
wallacearton 3 years ago
Yes, I agree !
Tazeruk 3 years ago
Get the notion out of your heads that this some kind of flute concerto!
Much of the time the flute and 1st violins
are playing the same notes!
Or else the 1st violins are reinforcing the flute by playing a simplified version of the flute line.
wcbroccoli 2 years ago
the above comment is correct, but its also a problem of capturing the acoustics
jumpoffmountaineers 2 years ago
Amazing...
Imcellist 4 years ago
Felicitaciones para el flautista, excelente control.
DiegoHCantor 4 years ago
ke bien
silla20 4 years ago
Awesome! One of my favorite orchestral works. great recording
lapaglia10 4 years ago
Its a shame the sound looks like acoustic, not microphoned individually. I get lost on violins and viola sound... but still yet a great recording ang playing!
covallini 5 years ago
Amazing! Great performance! Very authentic. Are the cello and bass using gut strings?
fhesi3 5 years ago
they are using gut strings (all of them) and using baroque bows and cellos are fitted without an endpin making everything as authentic as possible
anhvuti981 4 years ago
Felicitaciones, todos tienen la misma tecnica de arco...maravilloso!!!
Adrianoci 5 years ago