I like to be a smart ass and say that "the concept of the egg entered god's mind before the concept of the chicken so animals laid eggs before chickens evolved."
So if these 2 lines of thought are like lanes on a highway I just did doughnuts on them.
single celled organisms are extremely complex, no such thing as as simple cells as evolutionist would have us believe... there is a missing storyline before the true cell could have emerged. The program in a so called simple cell is so complicated i find it highly improvable and mathematically impossible that it could have evolved from non living matter with out intellectual designing
@ic2trees whether you find it improbable or not does not matter. what science can show us and what evidence leads us to is what matters. do yourself a favor, pick up a scientific journal and read about how the first cells came to be, the organelles, the membrane, the dna, all of it (its all in there). your argument is "I KNOW NOTHING ABOUT SCIENCE SO IM JUST GONNA SAY GOD DID IT BECAUSE THATS A LOT EASIER FOR ME TO UNDERSTAND AND I WONT HAVE TO READ AS MUCH". pathetic
If you think paying taxes is Unchristian, remember that jesus is nothing more than a 2nd century AD invention by some Italians. There are no historical documents to back the existence of Jesus Christ
I think the most important issue regarding the origin of life isnt how things evolved, but how they came into existence to start the evolutionary process... There are several catch 22's regardin this issue... Before even getting into an evolution vs. creationism debate i think evolutionists first need to explain the origin of life. Creationism has explained it albeit not scientifically but more through a process of elimination.
Gods not real. Christians say that it's Impossible for the world to be created out of nothing because everything needs a creator. If that's the case, how was god created. Fools, the lit of you. I don't give a toss about a fake god.
Could be no chicken with out an egg but egg cant hatch with out a certain amount of heat to hatch plus nothing to feed the chick hense Chicken must have came first
Religion is all lies, most of the stories are all stupid. Adam and Eve... If this was true that would mean that were all brothers and sisters... Inbred... hmmm, without religion there would be less wars, and the only possible reason I can think people believe in it is because there fear of death and what would happen to them after and need some sort of knowing before they die. That's my opinion.
Since all living organisms presumably have a common ancestor, we are all related. I totally agree with you that religion is evil and stupid. Your reasoning regarding why people chose to delude themselves is RIGHT ON. Fear of death. THAT IS EXACTLY the reason.
U make one big mistake blunty. According to some creationists all animals b4 the fall of man were herbavors (to explain why T-rexs never gobbled adam and eve. See Kent hovend for more info) so indeed no animals even the mighty trex would gobble up the chicks so the egg could have came first.
Not that I believe any of the above, I am not the one who views The Flintstones and thinks he is watching the History Channel.
Where is the evidence of god? Yeah, maybe earth and the things that live on it, but that can very well be science as well, there cannot be any evidence until we actually discover evidence, the bible is no evidence and is just what people say they have seen. The bible is just made up of stories. People who say they have seen god could have been hallucinating or if they have done something right like sacrifice or no sacrifice, their inner sense of what is right or wrong. Or, their conscience.
I really fail to see how any rationally thinking individual would ever believe that the stories in the bible are true. Unfortunately, most children are taught WHAT to think by their parents, not HOW to think. Parents want a carbon copy of themselves in their children, so they fill their minds with all the crap they believe. I honestly believe that this is BAD PARENTING.
The earliest chapters in Genesis are accounts likely copied down from other sources. There ar actually TWO SEPARATE accounts of creation in the first few chapters. The person/persons who wrote this clearly weren't around for the events. How would even the first man KNOW how god created the Heavens and the earth? NO HUMAN WAS AN EYE WITNESS. Why are we so willing to believe it happened literally the way it says in Genesis?
Science contradicts many of the MAJOR claims in the creation account, BASED ON ACTUAL PHYSICAL EVIDENCE. For example, the Universe CLEARLY wasn't created in six literal days. It came into existence billions of years ago. The earth is not the center of the Universe, the sun does not revolve around it, and it is not flat. The bible STRONGLY IMPLIES all these things, and in so doing reflect the common understanding of the time. That more than shows that HUMANS, not some god, wrote it.
If GOD did write the bible, then GOD is a moron who doesn't even know how he did it. I am amazed how so many Christians continue to claim that the bible is perfect and infallible and has never been proven wrong. HELLO? It has been proven wrong several times over. You really have to be self-delusional to have FAITH in something so ridiculous.
All people want power, when people belive in god beleve they have power and people how argue think they lose power if god exists people become defensive when you remove power.
to conclude firmly and forcibly that non- being reigns beyond the sensory realm would be a non-scientific choice, based on imagination and speculation.
Some people try to propagate this fantasy in the garb of science and to present their choice as having been dictated by scientific thought. In the final analysis, however, the denial involved in such an assertion is unworthy of science and philosophy, and even contradicts empirical logic.
everything is defined and delimited with reference to materialism.
To interpret materialism in such a sense is in the final analysis strictly meaningless; it would be a superstitious notion involving the perversion of truth, and to regard it as scientific would, in fact, be *treason* to science.
Even if the followers of a religious school of thought had no proofs for their claim, ...
Your delusions that science has put out the notion of God is purely rhetorical and has nothing to do with logical method, because even thousands of scientific experiments could not possibly suffice to demonstrate that no non-material being or factor exists. Your claim is nothing more than a fanatical illusion based on unproven theories. Views such as these derive directly from a system of thought centered on materialism; within it, ....
Then how can you delude yourself and believe that hydrogen and oxygen, electrons and protons, should first produce themselves, then be the source for all other beings, and finally decree the laws that regulate themselves and the rest of the material world?
How is that for YOUR "there is no god sorry to burst your bubble"?
oh my holy shit stop debating none of you is all knowing you just have opinions and it just so happens you think you are right but you may not be so shut the fuck up and watch the video and have fun
What you call science is really naturalism. It is NOT science. It is a presupposed conclusion. Show the actual transition from one to another another and not just speculation. Your video does nothing to explain the origin of life. Show a plausible explanation for the origin of life and not just a baseless postulation
@RAKEYREDARMS The evidence IS out there, just because you refuse to look for it, or acknowledge it doesn't mean it doesn't and it IS Science. And, once more, you fucking idiots... EVOLUTION IS NOT ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE ORIGIN OF LIFE... JUST THE DIVERSITY OF IT, YOU MASSIVE IGNORANT TWATS.
@Blunty3000 The evidence is out there? Inferring from some bones that macroevolution happened is not evidence. Extrapolation is not scientific. It is wishful thinking. You do understand the difference between operational and historical science, no? Trying to use "slight of hand" and say that evolution and science are interchangeable is simply incorrect. Naturalism has to account for the origin of life. The reason you don't want to do so is because it is a physical impossibility with no evidence
@RAKEYREDARMS You're so stupid, you make jesus cry with shame. He died for your sins and you pay him back by being EPICALLY FUCKING STUPID? nice. good luck with that.
@Blunty3000 Poor Blunty. The guy has NO evidence so he resorts to ad hominem attacks. I guess ignorance IS bliss. He sticks to the calling card of the Darwinist by trying to attack the man instead of the argument. Show some evidence Blunty, pleeeeeeeeeeeeease. That is all I ask. Your juxtaposition of "God vs. Science" is so played out. I am amazed that you don't realize this. It is Science vs Darwinism. Not science vs religion. Unless you want to call Darwinism a religion.....
@Blunty3000 it wont help to use evidence, threaten him with a hell for not accepting evolution and tell him he will get icecream for accepting evolution, that should work
@RAKEYREDARMS He's comparing EVOLUTION to Creationism. Evolution does not even attempt to explain the origins of life -- that is called Abiogenesis. It's a completely different field of science. If you have problems with Abiogenesis, you should comment on a video discussing Abiogenesis. This video is about Evolution. You wouldn't watch a video about Germ Theory and expect it to explain Gravity, would you?
@logsdonj Nice try dude. This is a cop out. If one adheres to naturalism, then abiogenesis is the just the first link the in chain of evolution. You try and separate them because you realize there is no evidence for it. Doesn't work like that. Abiogenesis and evolution would fall under biology, not a different field. Your last comment about germ theory and gravity is a complete non-sequitur. Marcoevolution + Abiogenesis = Biggest Joke In History
@RAKEYREDARMS Read "On the Origin of Species" and tell me where it attempts to explain how life started. It doesn't. It explains the diversity of life.
@RAKEYREDARMS Read "On the Origin of Species" and tell me where it attempts to explain how life started. It doesn't. It explains the diversity of life.
This is an extremely easy question to answer and I don't even have to go back to the Mesozoic. The species was "Red Jungle Fowl" before it was domesticated into the Chicken. Of course, Red Jungle Fowl lay eggs so the egg definitely came first.
Neither egg or chicken came first. Since there is no transisional line between the predecessors of chickens and the chicken itself. This because it wasn't a single egg from a single chicken. It was millions upon millions of eggs over many generations of chicken that lead to the mutational change in appearence.
Hi Blunty 3000 The answer is Cock. You can't make circular after that because the Cock shows that the egg implies fertilization therefore Cock comes first. Therefore mature combination had to occur before egg could occur. Creationists should agree considering its in the bible's proper order. I can also prove the case for evolutionists but its only applied after a big study claiming eggs produce the anomalies, then we can see for the anomaly to be consistent with chicken then the Cock must agree.
@someprson Either way we have the problem of "something" God or molecules" coming from "nothing". Molecules haven't given 100% fulfilled prophesy to prove their "infinity". God has. Those prophesies convinced the scientists I just mentioned & many others, that God exists. It makes sense that "God" would understand things we cannot.
@someprson Well, they had to "come" from somewhere either by natural processes (loke the big bang) or from God. The founders of virtually every branch of modern science (Newton, Kepler, Boyle, Faraday, etc) said true science "proves' they all come from God.
Did you ever thinck that god made us because he can and predicted science and that he made science for the benifts of humans and doent care that one in ten thinck there isn't god and that he isn't binded by time a creation he made to keep us animals and things from falling into despair so if he isn't controled by time he would be never created. So that's wat I thinck don't get affended enyone.
doesn't science say that something very similar to the chicken came and layed an egg which contained the random mutation that created the chicken as we know it today, making te egg first.
@zoddie hey just read your comment....Religion goes back at least as far as human civilizations. Nobody knows what the first religion was. The Egyptians predate the Jews, The Mesopotamians predate them. The Chinese predate them...
You know nothing about religion since you're a typical american christian. I bet you voted for mccain because fox news told you also. Enjoy your life knowing you were wrong in the end.....see i can say that too :)
When you say to others God doesnt exist I expect you to say something like, I have gazed under the skies (with my eyes) and travelled around the universe (walking) and carefully analyzed all the stars of HEAVEN(with these hands) and examined every corner of the Universe and did not find God. But seeing that you have not done any of these, it is clear to me that you are a moron and I cannot take you serious.
i love how i was going to make a comment correcting his evolutionary theory by saying the egg came first because of mutation in the egg resulting in the first chicken... then he said it at the end... now i feel silly...
Its a never ending argument that will continue for as long as life... Sure we couldve come from a big bang but think about it where the fuck did those particles come from?
What? So the first chicken had a live full term birth from some pre-chicken ancestor?
Species are a gradient you don't get CHICKEN in one generation it happens over millenia, the first "CHICKEN" would have been able to mate with any member of its parent species which would make it still a member of the parent species.
Eggs have been around since day dot the form of the egg has changed but its purpose remains the same. If the chicken comes first how was it born?! ...
God created the chicken like ALL living beings to procreate. God is not a fabrication, ppl who support this evolution bullshit refuse to give God any credit and I'm not down with that. I think Evolution is bullshit, God is real to me because it is to God that I pray and whom has given me blessings, not a scientists, not a damn prehistoric dunce-tard primate and definitely not a clan of atheists. God rules over all. Humans cant tell me shit.
As for the chicken and the egg thing, it's simple:
Just go back in the lineage of modern chickens up to the first ancient chicken that would be able to reproduce with a modern chicken with the same success rate as a modern chicken couple. That chicken came from an egg, but it's parents wouldn't be able to reproduce with modern chickens. Therefore, the egg came first. Also, as far as chickens or eggs in general come, eggs of all kinds came before the advent of chickens.
a 'god' created the potential for life, and evolution was the process by which it took form. Plus, whats the point in debating it? if you believe in god, then great, if it works for you, then even better. If you dont, then dont. I just think people should consider and atleast appreciate the differences and one anothers decisions about it.
we all right: GOD started the big bang.. after that evolution took it over..
but what is GOD? the way i see it.. its just the starter of the big bang.. GOD doese'nt have to be inteligent.. or did it with a reason.. it just happen.. but nobody know what god is.. so people make stories about there own fantasy.. everybody hes own thing.. but alot of followers follow a religion.. there all wrong.. nobody know what god is.. for he never showed up..
It is very easy to meet God. Just throw your body away from a hight building. He will say hello to you. As for me, I have been meetting Him personally in my deepest logic.
you didden't just grew up.. you where raised up with religion.. nothing wrong about that.. but if you was raised up whitout or even anti religion.. you would not believe or hate it.. you must see that in... thats inteligence.
and positive thinking has great effect on life.. and religion is a positive way of thinking.. thats why its clear for you.
but after all its about respect rather you believer or not.. let god decide about the non believers.. peace
its good to know u see the big bang as being a result from god... God does not have to be intelligent no... but with the outcome and complexity this universe has become you can surely see god is VERY intelligent. I am not sure if any religion is correct (that we are suppose to know our god) but i surely know this universe was created by something very intelligent. God bless :)
EXACTLY! I could understand if they said "through God WE EVOLVED" rather than some dumbass "BECAUSE OF EVOLUTION" totally ignoring the fact that even if we came from star dust, a big bang, or what ever SOMETHING devine initiated the process. Thats a fact, you cannot ignore.
@Xaymaicana if god is all powerful why would he feel the need to create something as insignificant as humans? If he is that mighty he wouldn't feel normal human emotions such as loneliness. So either god is a fairytale like santa or he isn't as powerful as one might think.
@blissfullydead89 ask him that. do i look like God to you? your questions, your insults dont fase me bro. I am a believer ge twith it or get lost.. the difference is i dont go by what I hear. I took the time to have a connection with my God. I ask and I am given. when i feel sorrow i pray for strength and I feel rejuvenated so no man, woman or child can tell me anything. So you just be athetist and do your thing. I will be monotheistic and blessed. lata gator.
@blissfullydead89 God created humans because he knows how preciouse and how good the universe is, so why not let other beings share the greatness of the universe?
@dude33ism Okay, if he's omniscient, omnipotent and omnipresent he would not have these kind of emotions. He would not feel the need to create us to feel joy for himself. He'd be perfect and therefore complete. Unless god is a contradiction to himself. Also, if god really is all knowing why would he create Lucifer knowing that he would rebel? god is not real.
everyone knows what truth is therefore everyone has the capability of knowing God.God is truth .science is merely the observation of what is! its like if you built a house and 50 yrs later scientists came to study your house and based on theories concluded that a series of events happened in order for your house to be constructed (but heres the kicker) they said the events took place by a tornado not by you an intelligent designer! men can be so asinine!
Haha, I would almost correct him that the first chicken would have to come from an egg, but he corrected it at the very end off the video. Very nice move there blunty
ya, that's right, but if your talking specifically about a chicken egg, then ya, but whenever someone asks me the question i always say the egg, cuz there egg-laying organisms way before chickens :P
@earthman202 yes but the egg came way before the first complicated animals i dont know the exact animal it evolved in first but it was around the time of the first algea type animals
1 thing id have to add would be that since evolution involves random mutation and natural selection that a chicken would have evolved from some sort of other creature similar to that of a chicken, and was then created via mutation but had to have come from sort of an egg but it wouldn't be a chicken egg.
This is typical either/or thinking as the answer is neither. The egg and the chicken came at the same time. The chicken and the egg are just two different names for the same process or being. It's like water on its way to becoming ice is still water, and vice versa.
This is it. This is the one. you have done it Blunty and I am proud of you. You have taken the most complex and controversary Topic of religion vs Creationism and broken It down.
I do hope one day I grow to have half a mind as processive as yourse.
Except of course we can prove evolution, natural selection, genetic mutation, and even taking a piss at something . We can't exactly prove that there is a God.
actually you cant prove evolution, but before you get defensive i believe in science, but i am religious, if you asked why or what created that event, you will get all the way back to the big bang, well what created that, scientists suggest that it came from nothing, it was like a box with nothing in it, well then.... who made the box??
idk maybe those asteroids came from the vastness of space, since the only way for things to hit our planet is by the wrath of an intelligent designer "god". eh, the egg came first! =D
lets say we had some old book that survived 2000 years and there was an actual drawing of jesus and the fact that he was real then would you believe in god?
All im gonna say is most of our information in science and philosophy comes from ages ago. Written on old books also. Its not like Newton died a year ago.
Remember that with age comes seniority and experience. Remember the older something is the more prestige experience and seniority it has. Calling something "some old book" Well really is more of a good thing than a bad thing.
Not attacking ur idea just pointing out that the sarcasm in it is misplaced.
Also Sorry for flooding the comments, sometimes I forget the golden rule about talking to strangers on the internet: "9/10 chance they are completely retarded." Thanks!
where did those single cell organism come about... you see thats just one of the flaws of evolution it has no origin fyi not to mention it just a lie created by secret societies used to drive people away from god.
*facepalm* you have a deep ignorance. Evolution never even TRIES to explain the ORIGIN of life, just what happened AFTER life arose. The scientific theories of how life originated are completely separate, and have nothing at all to do with the theory of evolution.
@Blunty3000 your right because the evolution theory consist of random mutations and everything evolving by luck basically it was a 1 in a million chance that we turned out to be humans right that makes more sense.
Evolution is less of a lie than a lot of theories about gravity and global warming, considering we can prove animals evolve as it has been documented since the idea has some about. Its very difficult if not impossible to prove some of the advanced theories on gravity and climate change. Hell Humans have been unnaturally evolving animals for thousands of years. Though yes Evolution does not explain the origin of life, nothing not even the Bible really explains that one and may always be unknown.
@SPYK3O just because its less of a lie doesnt mean its true its still a lie and about the animals evovling you said it yourself "Hell Humans have been unnaturally evolving animals for thousands of years". and im pretty sure the bible explains that God is the origin of life because he is the one who created it.
The Book of Genesis only says that God created life, it doesn't say how. Its very possible God used evolution as a tool to create life, a lot of people completely fail to even consider this as an option and is pretty ignorant in my opinion. Like I said its not a lie because it has been documented and repeated frequently with humans unnaturally evolving animals. If Evolution was completely a lie this would not even be possible as gene selection is pretty much the core of the theory on evolution.
@SPYK3O i understand that it doesn't explain how but... does it have to? i mean you know who created it what does it matter how it was made? and evolution is a tool of the devil (i know being religious) but its true the theory was made by secret societyis and you said it yourself humans are doing it which means evolution is not natural and you have witnessed some of the abominations that come from this and the fact that they hide most of their creations makes you think a little.
So basically what you are saying is that all of the domesticated: cattle, corn, wheat, dogs,fruit bearing trees, and vegetables are all abominations of the devil? because you must know humans have been unnaturally evolving them for thousands of years before Jesus is born. Also you exactly support my point, the Bible doesn't say exactly how God creates life so how can you use the Bible as a reference to how life is created?
@SPYK3O lol you miss my point but i think thats my fault i thought you would have understood what i meant so i will rephrase that " you see SOME of the abominations that have happened because of this they only let you see the good side of the double edged sword so people like you can promote the "good" in it. have you been reading about mad cow disease ( i wonder how that diseases came about) or people dying from these "evolved" fruits and these two headed creatures because i have. have you?
No I see your point, everything is a double edged sword. All life even the abominations are a gift from God as humans are unable to produce life we can only manipulate it. I'm not saying that the bad isn't out there im just saying things change and that not only does Evolution exist but it's a very solid theory.
@SPYK3O no. now its a double edged sword because of science trying to fix something that isn"t broken (I'm talking about nature) and know abominations are from the devils jealousy of god and trying to do everything he does. yes you are right evolution does exist... but only through unnatural acts meaning evolution is not a part of nature. for like the bible and the ten commandments things that god create are not affected by time for god himself is not limited to the confines of time or space.
The egg came first. Dinosaurs layed eggs way before the chicken did.
mastergremlin 1 year ago
RELIGION FUCKIN SUX!!!! religion has absolutely no proof and that there is a God has no proof whatsoever.
Chanak02 1 year ago
everytime somebody asks me this question I respond with "the egg since they didn't mention it had to be a chicken egg" :P
najex1 1 year ago
maybe nobody is right or maybe god made evolution? idk and idc :/
temporary1121 1 year ago
his final conclusion is realy realy retarded
Cyrusislikeawsome 1 year ago
I love fried chicken
HaloCaveMan 1 year ago
I like to be a smart ass and say that "the concept of the egg entered god's mind before the concept of the chicken so animals laid eggs before chickens evolved."
So if these 2 lines of thought are like lanes on a highway I just did doughnuts on them.
FattyMcFox 1 year ago
WATCH MY VIDEO ON YOUTUBE!!!
.com/watch?v=BSKGKqW74Ho
dannyboy2788 1 year ago
single celled organisms are extremely complex, no such thing as as simple cells as evolutionist would have us believe... there is a missing storyline before the true cell could have emerged. The program in a so called simple cell is so complicated i find it highly improvable and mathematically impossible that it could have evolved from non living matter with out intellectual designing
ic2trees 1 year ago
@ic2trees whether you find it improbable or not does not matter. what science can show us and what evidence leads us to is what matters. do yourself a favor, pick up a scientific journal and read about how the first cells came to be, the organelles, the membrane, the dna, all of it (its all in there). your argument is "I KNOW NOTHING ABOUT SCIENCE SO IM JUST GONNA SAY GOD DID IT BECAUSE THATS A LOT EASIER FOR ME TO UNDERSTAND AND I WONT HAVE TO READ AS MUCH". pathetic
caddy38 1 year ago
haha awesome job dude.
EasternAggie 1 year ago
If you think paying taxes is Unchristian, remember that jesus is nothing more than a 2nd century AD invention by some Italians. There are no historical documents to back the existence of Jesus Christ
MsTommyknocker 1 year ago
CHICKEN PUDDING!!! :D
((just because I was fed up of peoples arguements over science/god below haha))
eyesofemerald50 1 year ago
I think the most important issue regarding the origin of life isnt how things evolved, but how they came into existence to start the evolutionary process... There are several catch 22's regardin this issue... Before even getting into an evolution vs. creationism debate i think evolutionists first need to explain the origin of life. Creationism has explained it albeit not scientifically but more through a process of elimination.
thomarv 1 year ago
Gods not real. Christians say that it's Impossible for the world to be created out of nothing because everything needs a creator. If that's the case, how was god created. Fools, the lit of you. I don't give a toss about a fake god.
Jordanceremonyfan92 1 year ago
Could be no chicken with out an egg but egg cant hatch with out a certain amount of heat to hatch plus nothing to feed the chick hense Chicken must have came first
NEXTCMedia 1 year ago
god created evolution....daaaaaa, everybody knows that :-)
northernpike56 1 year ago
no your rong because you eat eggs in the morning and chicken at night so the egg comes fist and chicken comes second daa
moomoomoo7 1 year ago
Religion is all lies, most of the stories are all stupid. Adam and Eve... If this was true that would mean that were all brothers and sisters... Inbred... hmmm, without religion there would be less wars, and the only possible reason I can think people believe in it is because there fear of death and what would happen to them after and need some sort of knowing before they die. That's my opinion.
KlNGHUGGS 1 year ago
@KlNGHUGGS
Since all living organisms presumably have a common ancestor, we are all related. I totally agree with you that religion is evil and stupid. Your reasoning regarding why people chose to delude themselves is RIGHT ON. Fear of death. THAT IS EXACTLY the reason.
rblight10 1 year ago
U make one big mistake blunty. According to some creationists all animals b4 the fall of man were herbavors (to explain why T-rexs never gobbled adam and eve. See Kent hovend for more info) so indeed no animals even the mighty trex would gobble up the chicks so the egg could have came first.
Not that I believe any of the above, I am not the one who views The Flintstones and thinks he is watching the History Channel.
Yaba Daba Dooooooo
MajorDestruction 1 year ago
Where is the evidence of god? Yeah, maybe earth and the things that live on it, but that can very well be science as well, there cannot be any evidence until we actually discover evidence, the bible is no evidence and is just what people say they have seen. The bible is just made up of stories. People who say they have seen god could have been hallucinating or if they have done something right like sacrifice or no sacrifice, their inner sense of what is right or wrong. Or, their conscience.
Jaosin3 1 year ago
@Jaosin3
I really fail to see how any rationally thinking individual would ever believe that the stories in the bible are true. Unfortunately, most children are taught WHAT to think by their parents, not HOW to think. Parents want a carbon copy of themselves in their children, so they fill their minds with all the crap they believe. I honestly believe that this is BAD PARENTING.
rblight10 1 year ago
@Jaosin3
The earliest chapters in Genesis are accounts likely copied down from other sources. There ar actually TWO SEPARATE accounts of creation in the first few chapters. The person/persons who wrote this clearly weren't around for the events. How would even the first man KNOW how god created the Heavens and the earth? NO HUMAN WAS AN EYE WITNESS. Why are we so willing to believe it happened literally the way it says in Genesis?
rblight10 1 year ago
@Jaosin3
Science contradicts many of the MAJOR claims in the creation account, BASED ON ACTUAL PHYSICAL EVIDENCE. For example, the Universe CLEARLY wasn't created in six literal days. It came into existence billions of years ago. The earth is not the center of the Universe, the sun does not revolve around it, and it is not flat. The bible STRONGLY IMPLIES all these things, and in so doing reflect the common understanding of the time. That more than shows that HUMANS, not some god, wrote it.
rblight10 1 year ago
@Jaosin3
If GOD did write the bible, then GOD is a moron who doesn't even know how he did it. I am amazed how so many Christians continue to claim that the bible is perfect and infallible and has never been proven wrong. HELLO? It has been proven wrong several times over. You really have to be self-delusional to have FAITH in something so ridiculous.
rblight10 1 year ago
I have no clue what you do for a living, but if that falls through you can be a stunt double for Rober Downey Jr.
Jiggerjinn 1 year ago
glad I waited till the end, nice to see you do realise it was the egg first :3
ShadowofProclimaton 1 year ago
Comment removed
Lioobayoyo 1 year ago
@Lioobayoyo Watch the video till the very end...
KlNGHUGGS 1 year ago
@KlNGHUGGS
hehe right,...i'll delete my previous comment.
Lioobayoyo 1 year ago
i have said this on quite a few of your videos but i will say it again... you are a genius! its good to see someone taking the piss like you do.
SerasXHarkonnen 1 year ago
All people want power, when people belive in god beleve they have power and people how argue think they lose power if god exists people become defensive when you remove power.
TheGodofWarmars 1 year ago
im off to KFC...Got hungry...
fairhillnorrie 1 year ago
The egg
wilmer420 1 year ago
to conclude firmly and forcibly that non- being reigns beyond the sensory realm would be a non-scientific choice, based on imagination and speculation.
Some people try to propagate this fantasy in the garb of science and to present their choice as having been dictated by scientific thought. In the final analysis, however, the denial involved in such an assertion is unworthy of science and philosophy, and even contradicts empirical logic.
1tabligh 1 year ago
everything is defined and delimited with reference to materialism.
To interpret materialism in such a sense is in the final analysis strictly meaningless; it would be a superstitious notion involving the perversion of truth, and to regard it as scientific would, in fact, be *treason* to science.
Even if the followers of a religious school of thought had no proofs for their claim, ...
1tabligh 1 year ago
The atheist Delusion!
Your delusions that science has put out the notion of God is purely rhetorical and has nothing to do with logical method, because even thousands of scientific experiments could not possibly suffice to demonstrate that no non-material being or factor exists. Your claim is nothing more than a fanatical illusion based on unproven theories. Views such as these derive directly from a system of thought centered on materialism; within it, ....
1tabligh 1 year ago
The frog laid eggs... eggs came first
choonhachat 1 year ago
maybe god created evolution????? find that out >:D
drholyshitful 1 year ago
@drholyshitful there is no god sorry to burst your bubble
ThatIncredibleJordan 1 year ago
@ThatIncredibleJordan there is no god sorry to burst your bubble
________
Then how can you delude yourself and believe that hydrogen and oxygen, electrons and protons, should first produce themselves, then be the source for all other beings, and finally decree the laws that regulate themselves and the rest of the material world?
How is that for YOUR "there is no god sorry to burst your bubble"?
1tabligh 1 year ago
oh my holy shit stop debating none of you is all knowing you just have opinions and it just so happens you think you are right but you may not be so shut the fuck up and watch the video and have fun
VideoDjini 1 year ago
Comment removed
VideoDjini 1 year ago
What you call science is really naturalism. It is NOT science. It is a presupposed conclusion. Show the actual transition from one to another another and not just speculation. Your video does nothing to explain the origin of life. Show a plausible explanation for the origin of life and not just a baseless postulation
RAKEYREDARMS 1 year ago
@RAKEYREDARMS The evidence IS out there, just because you refuse to look for it, or acknowledge it doesn't mean it doesn't and it IS Science. And, once more, you fucking idiots... EVOLUTION IS NOT ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE ORIGIN OF LIFE... JUST THE DIVERSITY OF IT, YOU MASSIVE IGNORANT TWATS.
Blunty3000 1 year ago
@Blunty3000 The evidence is out there? Inferring from some bones that macroevolution happened is not evidence. Extrapolation is not scientific. It is wishful thinking. You do understand the difference between operational and historical science, no? Trying to use "slight of hand" and say that evolution and science are interchangeable is simply incorrect. Naturalism has to account for the origin of life. The reason you don't want to do so is because it is a physical impossibility with no evidence
RAKEYREDARMS 1 year ago
@RAKEYREDARMS You're so stupid, you make jesus cry with shame. He died for your sins and you pay him back by being EPICALLY FUCKING STUPID? nice. good luck with that.
Blunty3000 1 year ago
@Blunty3000 Poor Blunty. The guy has NO evidence so he resorts to ad hominem attacks. I guess ignorance IS bliss. He sticks to the calling card of the Darwinist by trying to attack the man instead of the argument. Show some evidence Blunty, pleeeeeeeeeeeeease. That is all I ask. Your juxtaposition of "God vs. Science" is so played out. I am amazed that you don't realize this. It is Science vs Darwinism. Not science vs religion. Unless you want to call Darwinism a religion.....
RAKEYREDARMS 1 year ago
@Blunty3000 maybe they would feel what you are saying better, if you hadn't um, cursed.
dezinediva 1 year ago
@Blunty3000 it wont help to use evidence, threaten him with a hell for not accepting evolution and tell him he will get icecream for accepting evolution, that should work
blazereef 1 year ago
@Blunty3000 as much as i enjoyed this video, you will never be able to teach anything to the "ignorant twats" , as they are "ignorant twats". :)
Never fear though, they will know the truth when they die.
geetarwanabe 1 year ago
@RAKEYREDARMS He's comparing EVOLUTION to Creationism. Evolution does not even attempt to explain the origins of life -- that is called Abiogenesis. It's a completely different field of science. If you have problems with Abiogenesis, you should comment on a video discussing Abiogenesis. This video is about Evolution. You wouldn't watch a video about Germ Theory and expect it to explain Gravity, would you?
logsdonj 1 year ago
@logsdonj Nice try dude. This is a cop out. If one adheres to naturalism, then abiogenesis is the just the first link the in chain of evolution. You try and separate them because you realize there is no evidence for it. Doesn't work like that. Abiogenesis and evolution would fall under biology, not a different field. Your last comment about germ theory and gravity is a complete non-sequitur. Marcoevolution + Abiogenesis = Biggest Joke In History
RAKEYREDARMS 1 year ago
@RAKEYREDARMS Read "On the Origin of Species" and tell me where it attempts to explain how life started. It doesn't. It explains the diversity of life.
logsdonj 1 year ago
@RAKEYREDARMS Read "On the Origin of Species" and tell me where it attempts to explain how life started. It doesn't. It explains the diversity of life.
logsdonj 1 year ago
This is an extremely easy question to answer and I don't even have to go back to the Mesozoic. The species was "Red Jungle Fowl" before it was domesticated into the Chicken. Of course, Red Jungle Fowl lay eggs so the egg definitely came first.
Tapajara 1 year ago
ha bro i think god is real bro
borishog 1 year ago
Neither egg or chicken came first. Since there is no transisional line between the predecessors of chickens and the chicken itself. This because it wasn't a single egg from a single chicken. It was millions upon millions of eggs over many generations of chicken that lead to the mutational change in appearence.
Therefore it's a gradient transition.
knorvax 1 year ago
Hi Blunty 3000 The answer is Cock. You can't make circular after that because the Cock shows that the egg implies fertilization therefore Cock comes first. Therefore mature combination had to occur before egg could occur. Creationists should agree considering its in the bible's proper order. I can also prove the case for evolutionists but its only applied after a big study claiming eggs produce the anomalies, then we can see for the anomaly to be consistent with chicken then the Cock must agree.
stubbornVN 1 year ago
Science asks questions, religion does not.
jessydaytime 1 year ago
Its about what parent lived long enough to pass on their genes.
jessydaytime 1 year ago
@someprson Either way we have the problem of "something" God or molecules" coming from "nothing". Molecules haven't given 100% fulfilled prophesy to prove their "infinity". God has. Those prophesies convinced the scientists I just mentioned & many others, that God exists. It makes sense that "God" would understand things we cannot.
moabedom 1 year ago
@someprson Well, they had to "come" from somewhere either by natural processes (loke the big bang) or from God. The founders of virtually every branch of modern science (Newton, Kepler, Boyle, Faraday, etc) said true science "proves' they all come from God.
moabedom 1 year ago
the first organism you drew - where did it come from?
yepalme 1 year ago
@yepalme It came from a chemical reaction.
xXFlameDogXx 1 year ago
Did you ever thinck that god made us because he can and predicted science and that he made science for the benifts of humans and doent care that one in ten thinck there isn't god and that he isn't binded by time a creation he made to keep us animals and things from falling into despair so if he isn't controled by time he would be never created. So that's wat I thinck don't get affended enyone.
SaceedAbul 1 year ago
doesn't science say that something very similar to the chicken came and layed an egg which contained the random mutation that created the chicken as we know it today, making te egg first.
confusinglelongname 1 year ago
God made the birds first and then the birds brought about the egg.
johnthreesixteen316 1 year ago
@zoddie hey just read your comment....Religion goes back at least as far as human civilizations. Nobody knows what the first religion was. The Egyptians predate the Jews, The Mesopotamians predate them. The Chinese predate them...
You know nothing about religion since you're a typical american christian. I bet you voted for mccain because fox news told you also. Enjoy your life knowing you were wrong in the end.....see i can say that too :)
LacedShit 1 year ago
When you say to others God doesnt exist I expect you to say something like, I have gazed under the skies (with my eyes) and travelled around the universe (walking) and carefully analyzed all the stars of HEAVEN(with these hands) and examined every corner of the Universe and did not find God. But seeing that you have not done any of these, it is clear to me that you are a moron and I cannot take you serious.
Woting14 1 year ago
Robert Downey Jr needs to lay off the cakes
slimfandango 1 year ago
Use a tiny dinosaur instead of a frog next time. Chickens did evolve from dinosaurs after all.
ArcaneKarma 1 year ago
??????
andrecito08 1 year ago
Wait a minute.Dont the frog EGGS come first? And anyway,whats the proof that God didn't make the single cell organism?
youngdrodeau 1 year ago
GO SCIENCE!!!!!!!!!
wowpockopa 1 year ago
lmfao a chicken that looks like michle j fox did it HAHAH! that was awesome
SuperMrfunky 1 year ago
i love how i was going to make a comment correcting his evolutionary theory by saying the egg came first because of mutation in the egg resulting in the first chicken... then he said it at the end... now i feel silly...
i <3 u blunty =D
tarawh 1 year ago
i believe we were created, but thats a matter of faith.
andresdinner 1 year ago
Its a never ending argument that will continue for as long as life... Sure we couldve come from a big bang but think about it where the fuck did those particles come from?
kalebmokukaleb 1 year ago
@kalebmokukaleb FUCK THE BIG BANG! ITS ALL ABOUT THE CHICKEN MAHN!
ThatOneGuyYouSaw15 1 year ago
What? So the first chicken had a live full term birth from some pre-chicken ancestor?
Species are a gradient you don't get CHICKEN in one generation it happens over millenia, the first "CHICKEN" would have been able to mate with any member of its parent species which would make it still a member of the parent species.
Eggs have been around since day dot the form of the egg has changed but its purpose remains the same. If the chicken comes first how was it born?! ...
KaelHunter 1 year ago
Totally... The genetics change from the chicken to the egg. Once the egg is created the genes are set, for the new chicken.
drupib 1 year ago
The frog at the end of the video is correct. The egg came first, according to the theory of evolution.
oh and creationists r teh ghey lol
MrStabby0 1 year ago
I believe in God...my Father, my Creator, My Savior
gearsdan 1 year ago
God created the chicken like ALL living beings to procreate. God is not a fabrication, ppl who support this evolution bullshit refuse to give God any credit and I'm not down with that. I think Evolution is bullshit, God is real to me because it is to God that I pray and whom has given me blessings, not a scientists, not a damn prehistoric dunce-tard primate and definitely not a clan of atheists. God rules over all. Humans cant tell me shit.
Xaymaicana 1 year ago
@Xaymaicana Funny since humans wrote the bible.....
blissfullydead89 1 year ago
@blissfullydead89 and humans are telling you theres no God funny how the two parallel. gtfoh.
Xaymaicana 1 year ago
@Xaymaicana No one told me there was no god, I grew up, realized fairytales were stupid and decided for myself that god was dead.
blissfullydead89 1 year ago
@blissfullydead89 good. write a book about it, may you will find someone who cares.
Xaymaicana 1 year ago
*maybe.
Xaymaicana 1 year ago
@Xaymaicana I did. It's called God. He's farce.
blissfullydead89 1 year ago
One could argue that the chicken was spewed forth from the frog EGGS, which came first.
stratty23 1 year ago
As for the chicken and the egg thing, it's simple:
Just go back in the lineage of modern chickens up to the first ancient chicken that would be able to reproduce with a modern chicken with the same success rate as a modern chicken couple. That chicken came from an egg, but it's parents wouldn't be able to reproduce with modern chickens. Therefore, the egg came first. Also, as far as chickens or eggs in general come, eggs of all kinds came before the advent of chickens.
mostliberal 1 year ago
Your logic here is extremely flawed.
Egg comes first.
GaryckA 1 year ago
What if both were true?
a 'god' created the potential for life, and evolution was the process by which it took form. Plus, whats the point in debating it? if you believe in god, then great, if it works for you, then even better. If you dont, then dont. I just think people should consider and atleast appreciate the differences and one anothers decisions about it.
70k3r74m35 1 year ago
lol pudding
sirlaffsallot 1 year ago
People see this as a God VS Science...no this is chicken or egg.
Chicken came first, in both Evolution and Religous views....couldnt agree more! Good job, Blunty!
DirtyPlatinumGun 1 year ago
Chicken Pudding..?
Is it strange that hearing that makes me hungry?
KOICrowz 1 year ago
That is a very good point... though I just keep disliking how it's always if you believe in God you are a Creationist... eh...
also, a theory isn't something that has evidence to back it up... it's something that hasn't been disproved yet...
Vampir5 1 year ago
the egg came first
1. options Dinosors eggs
2.option the first not fully chicken leight a
chiken egg.
Blunty i am on jour side but thats not ride info
johnjohnybug 1 year ago
God did not make humans. Ape sub species evolved into humans after branching out.
fu2yda 1 year ago
we all right: GOD started the big bang.. after that evolution took it over..
but what is GOD? the way i see it.. its just the starter of the big bang.. GOD doese'nt have to be inteligent.. or did it with a reason.. it just happen.. but nobody know what god is.. so people make stories about there own fantasy.. everybody hes own thing.. but alot of followers follow a religion.. there all wrong.. nobody know what god is.. for he never showed up..
roydamanna 1 year ago
Comment removed
kesatriapiningit 1 year ago
It is very easy to meet God. Just throw your body away from a hight building. He will say hello to you. As for me, I have been meetting Him personally in my deepest logic.
kesatriapiningit 1 year ago
answer me this question:
are your parents believers?
and what if they diddent?
roydamanna 1 year ago
My parents teach me about the creator. And after I grown up, I believe about it.
Just do my suggestion above, and all will become clear brother...
kesatriapiningit 1 year ago
you didden't just grew up.. you where raised up with religion.. nothing wrong about that.. but if you was raised up whitout or even anti religion.. you would not believe or hate it.. you must see that in... thats inteligence.
and positive thinking has great effect on life.. and religion is a positive way of thinking.. thats why its clear for you.
but after all its about respect rather you believer or not.. let god decide about the non believers.. peace
roydamanna 1 year ago
its good to know u see the big bang as being a result from god... God does not have to be intelligent no... but with the outcome and complexity this universe has become you can surely see god is VERY intelligent. I am not sure if any religion is correct (that we are suppose to know our god) but i surely know this universe was created by something very intelligent. God bless :)
Tahnz86 1 year ago
EXACTLY! I could understand if they said "through God WE EVOLVED" rather than some dumbass "BECAUSE OF EVOLUTION" totally ignoring the fact that even if we came from star dust, a big bang, or what ever SOMETHING devine initiated the process. Thats a fact, you cannot ignore.
Xaymaicana 1 year ago
@Xaymaicana if god is all powerful why would he feel the need to create something as insignificant as humans? If he is that mighty he wouldn't feel normal human emotions such as loneliness. So either god is a fairytale like santa or he isn't as powerful as one might think.
blissfullydead89 1 year ago
@blissfullydead89 ask him that. do i look like God to you? your questions, your insults dont fase me bro. I am a believer ge twith it or get lost.. the difference is i dont go by what I hear. I took the time to have a connection with my God. I ask and I am given. when i feel sorrow i pray for strength and I feel rejuvenated so no man, woman or child can tell me anything. So you just be athetist and do your thing. I will be monotheistic and blessed. lata gator.
Xaymaicana 1 year ago
@Xaymaicana Circular logic.
blissfullydead89 1 year ago
@blissfullydead89 God created humans because he knows how preciouse and how good the universe is, so why not let other beings share the greatness of the universe?
dude33ism 1 year ago
@dude33ism Okay, if he's omniscient, omnipotent and omnipresent he would not have these kind of emotions. He would not feel the need to create us to feel joy for himself. He'd be perfect and therefore complete. Unless god is a contradiction to himself. Also, if god really is all knowing why would he create Lucifer knowing that he would rebel? god is not real.
blissfullydead89 1 year ago
everyone knows what truth is therefore everyone has the capability of knowing God.God is truth .science is merely the observation of what is! its like if you built a house and 50 yrs later scientists came to study your house and based on theories concluded that a series of events happened in order for your house to be constructed (but heres the kicker) they said the events took place by a tornado not by you an intelligent designer! men can be so asinine!
mikelipko 1 year ago
the frog is right.
zDToddy 2 years ago
Both happened
willleemarie 2 years ago
little retard frog..hah
ShirayuriSky 2 years ago
"THEORY! (Supported by evidence!)"
hahah. I love it.
silentwisp7 2 years ago
evolution is great and also a fact
patrickledford420 2 years ago
Haha, I would almost correct him that the first chicken would have to come from an egg, but he corrected it at the very end off the video. Very nice move there blunty
Thedutchjelle 2 years ago
ya, that's right, but if your talking specifically about a chicken egg, then ya, but whenever someone asks me the question i always say the egg, cuz there egg-laying organisms way before chickens :P
grandhalofreak 2 years ago
didn't birds evolve from dinosaurs? doesn't that mean the egg would've came first?
earthman202 2 years ago
@earthman202 yes but the egg came way before the first complicated animals i dont know the exact animal it evolved in first but it was around the time of the first algea type animals
patrickledford420 2 years ago
@earthman202 yeah I agree with that
shandorejunk 2 years ago
the answer is a circle has no beginning
harrymail7 2 years ago
Then how do you draw one?
Blunty3000 2 years ago
true
harrymail7 2 years ago
although where does the drawing begin i couldnt possibly think that someone would be able to distinguish to where the circle began and ended
harrymail7 2 years ago
@Blunty3000
draw a circle with a pencil and paper
kygner 1 year ago
@harrymail7 it starts at the end
modernrocks 1 year ago
that was funny and interesting
Supageeksupafreek 2 years ago
1 thing id have to add would be that since evolution involves random mutation and natural selection that a chicken would have evolved from some sort of other creature similar to that of a chicken, and was then created via mutation but had to have come from sort of an egg but it wouldn't be a chicken egg.
yautjaclan 2 years ago
I love you man!!! The chicken looks pretty sad though.
mossandthesea 2 years ago
This is typical either/or thinking as the answer is neither. The egg and the chicken came at the same time. The chicken and the egg are just two different names for the same process or being. It's like water on its way to becoming ice is still water, and vice versa.
Whatever happened to "think, then do"?
TheDemonPazuzu 2 years ago
shut up blunty said it was chicken lolololololololololololololololololol
dirtysoap247 2 years ago
in my opinion, Evolution and Creationism compliment each other. God makes organism, organism mutates if all goes well new species.
bc0wful 2 years ago
Dinosaurs laid eggs long before chickens even existed.
william633 2 years ago
@william633 And fish laid eggs long before dinosaurs existed. do you have a point?
Blunty3000 2 years ago
@Blunty3000 maybe they're chicken...fish...thingies
ThatOneGuyYouSaw15 1 year ago
@Blunty3000
His point is that eggs came first.
GreatImperium 1 year ago
By the way, I loved the bit at the end, The part where the frog contradicts. Funny. Chicken pudding.
Anyway, Thanks again for breaking down religion and evolution, two very vast topics, in such a comedic and simple way.
Jikario 2 years ago
This is it. This is the one. you have done it Blunty and I am proud of you. You have taken the most complex and controversary Topic of religion vs Creationism and broken It down.
I do hope one day I grow to have half a mind as processive as yourse.
Jikario 2 years ago
Oops, I messed up. Forgive me, I meant
"Religion Vs Evolution"
Jikario 2 years ago
who said it was a chicken egg?
LynxRecover 2 years ago
damn chickens. good eating though
TheBurtmeister 2 years ago
Except of course we can prove evolution, natural selection, genetic mutation, and even taking a piss at something . We can't exactly prove that there is a God.
PrisonCipher 2 years ago
actually you cant prove evolution, but before you get defensive i believe in science, but i am religious, if you asked why or what created that event, you will get all the way back to the big bang, well what created that, scientists suggest that it came from nothing, it was like a box with nothing in it, well then.... who made the box??
jimyking 2 years ago
God did of course, or maybe where did those 2 asteroids come from in the first place? and so and so on
bc0wful 2 years ago
idk maybe those asteroids came from the vastness of space, since the only way for things to hit our planet is by the wrath of an intelligent designer "god". eh, the egg came first! =D
killersRejoice 2 years ago
lets say we had some old book that survived 2000 years and there was an actual drawing of jesus and the fact that he was real then would you believe in god?
bc0wful 2 years ago
all im gonna say is u have an old book and a drawing of a dude that im not saying didnt exist but look at the math.
2000 year old book+drawing of Jesus=God?
(not attacking the idea of god just ur example.)
yautjaclan 2 years ago
I think he's real man seriously. Better be safe than sorry ;D
bc0wful 2 years ago
@yautjaclan
All im gonna say is most of our information in science and philosophy comes from ages ago. Written on old books also. Its not like Newton died a year ago.
Remember that with age comes seniority and experience. Remember the older something is the more prestige experience and seniority it has. Calling something "some old book" Well really is more of a good thing than a bad thing.
Not attacking ur idea just pointing out that the sarcasm in it is misplaced.
TonyFbaby87 2 years ago
what came first the termite or the proto critters in the termites belly??
neither can survive w/o the other
h2omanz 2 years ago
isnt funny that back in the day they used to believe that we all evolved from goo.......lol
h2omanz 2 years ago
surely the eggs made by the frogs and the random mutations all firstly came from eggs....just a thought but i know you taking the piss lol
bluelagoon10023 2 years ago
but dinosaurs layed eggs dammit lol
imxyourxnightmare 2 years ago
Comment removed
MORGE2481 2 years ago
Science says egg came first because another organism payed an egg with a mutation that became a chicken
maidenman987 2 years ago
egg came first
GnarrkillWoW 2 years ago
funny vid, but I cringed a little at the M.J. Fox joke lol
bent2422 2 years ago
Also Sorry for flooding the comments, sometimes I forget the golden rule about talking to strangers on the internet: "9/10 chance they are completely retarded." Thanks!
SPYK3O 2 years ago
Comment removed
SPYK3O 2 years ago
Also yeah the chicken most definitely came first.
SPYK3O 2 years ago
where did those single cell organism come about... you see thats just one of the flaws of evolution it has no origin fyi not to mention it just a lie created by secret societies used to drive people away from god.
Dkenair2 2 years ago
*facepalm* you have a deep ignorance. Evolution never even TRIES to explain the ORIGIN of life, just what happened AFTER life arose. The scientific theories of how life originated are completely separate, and have nothing at all to do with the theory of evolution.
Blunty3000 2 years ago
@Blunty3000 your right because the evolution theory consist of random mutations and everything evolving by luck basically it was a 1 in a million chance that we turned out to be humans right that makes more sense.
Dkenair2 2 years ago
Evolution is less of a lie than a lot of theories about gravity and global warming, considering we can prove animals evolve as it has been documented since the idea has some about. Its very difficult if not impossible to prove some of the advanced theories on gravity and climate change. Hell Humans have been unnaturally evolving animals for thousands of years. Though yes Evolution does not explain the origin of life, nothing not even the Bible really explains that one and may always be unknown.
SPYK3O 2 years ago
@SPYK3O just because its less of a lie doesnt mean its true its still a lie and about the animals evovling you said it yourself "Hell Humans have been unnaturally evolving animals for thousands of years". and im pretty sure the bible explains that God is the origin of life because he is the one who created it.
Dkenair2 2 years ago
The Book of Genesis only says that God created life, it doesn't say how. Its very possible God used evolution as a tool to create life, a lot of people completely fail to even consider this as an option and is pretty ignorant in my opinion. Like I said its not a lie because it has been documented and repeated frequently with humans unnaturally evolving animals. If Evolution was completely a lie this would not even be possible as gene selection is pretty much the core of the theory on evolution.
SPYK3O 2 years ago
@SPYK3O i understand that it doesn't explain how but... does it have to? i mean you know who created it what does it matter how it was made? and evolution is a tool of the devil (i know being religious) but its true the theory was made by secret societyis and you said it yourself humans are doing it which means evolution is not natural and you have witnessed some of the abominations that come from this and the fact that they hide most of their creations makes you think a little.
Dkenair2 2 years ago
So basically what you are saying is that all of the domesticated: cattle, corn, wheat, dogs,fruit bearing trees, and vegetables are all abominations of the devil? because you must know humans have been unnaturally evolving them for thousands of years before Jesus is born. Also you exactly support my point, the Bible doesn't say exactly how God creates life so how can you use the Bible as a reference to how life is created?
Open your mind and shut your mouth.
SPYK3O 2 years ago
@SPYK3O lol you miss my point but i think thats my fault i thought you would have understood what i meant so i will rephrase that " you see SOME of the abominations that have happened because of this they only let you see the good side of the double edged sword so people like you can promote the "good" in it. have you been reading about mad cow disease ( i wonder how that diseases came about) or people dying from these "evolved" fruits and these two headed creatures because i have. have you?
Dkenair2 2 years ago
No I see your point, everything is a double edged sword. All life even the abominations are a gift from God as humans are unable to produce life we can only manipulate it. I'm not saying that the bad isn't out there im just saying things change and that not only does Evolution exist but it's a very solid theory.
SPYK3O 2 years ago
@SPYK3O no. now its a double edged sword because of science trying to fix something that isn"t broken (I'm talking about nature) and know abominations are from the devils jealousy of god and trying to do everything he does. yes you are right evolution does exist... but only through unnatural acts meaning evolution is not a part of nature. for like the bible and the ten commandments things that god create are not affected by time for god himself is not limited to the confines of time or space.
Dkenair2 2 years ago