According to Al Gore's predictions this wasn't supposed to happen.
Now the alarmists are saying only SEA ICE (yes they capitalize it) is growing as if some how it's warmer over land in Antarctica and the ice is melting there. But its land ice gets thicker every year for 1000's of years now. Yearly snow compresses underlying snow into ice
Al Gore wins the Nobel Prize? For what? Global warming is a joke. Like Al Gore winning the Nobel Prize. It's almost as funny as Bill O'Reilly writing a book for kids about sex or electing Bill Clinton President. Who says God doesn't have a sense of homor.
Global warming is an interesting theory, NOT FACT. Example: Carbon dioxide HAS increased in the past century due to fossil fuels and the avg. global temp has increased 0.8 degrees in the same period. HOWEVER most of that temp increase came BEFORE 1940. Most new carbon dioxide was added AFTER 1960. I'm just suspicious of a failed politicion charging $100K for a speach about armageddon.
It is indeed a theory, as is gravity. There are very few things in science considered facts: Newton's Law, 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics, etc. A short list. Global warming is considered a "strong" theory: it has held up to multiple lines of observational evidence.......not just the observed temperature record but additional independent lines of evidence.
Furthermore, you are incorrect in your assertion that most of the warming was prior to 1940 though indeed some of the warming over the last 100 years did occur prior to 1940. The "bump" in the global mean temperature record is well-explained by the known cooling from sulfate aerosols. Models show this quite well.
Finally, I wouldn't get too sidetracked by Gore. It is the peer-reviewed literature that is the most reliable source of what is known about this problem. Al Gore is just communicating what he has read and heard. The IPCC is far more deserving of this award and it is that work that the public should look to rather than Gore's comments. Thanks.
MANY things in science are considered fact. Gravity IS a fact and is demonstratable. Lets assume that global warming is a 'strong' theory. It is not YET demonstrable. A number of scientists agree that there is not enough data, AT THIS TIME, to support the theory that man is responsable for the planet warming. The planet has warmed AND cooled many times without any help from man. This is a fact.
Sorry, but in scientific parlance, gravity is a theory (see any introductory physics textbook). My point is that nobody would question this theory because it is as close to scientific fact as one gets without actually being one. GW is indeed not to the level of gravity, but it is supported by a considerable amount of theoretical foundation and observational data. The scientific community that actually engages in climate science overwhelmingly supports the IPCC statements on climate change.
OK, I will beleive Gravity is a theory and not an absolue fact when I start flying around this room. GW was first esposed as a 'theory' in 1958. In the 1970's Time magazine ran a cover story warning of Global Cooling. I assume there were a number of scientisis who agreed with THAT theory.
I think you are misunderstanding how a scientist uses the word "theory" - quite different from the layperson. I am merely trying to point out that much of what we know is scientifically considered theory.....some are just more developed than others. GW is not as developed or supported as gravity but that does not mean it is a random whim either. It has a foundation and supporting evidence.
But leave that aside. Actually, the theory was put forward in 1898 by Svante Arrhenius. Suggested that a doubling of CO2 would cause a 5 C rise......not so far from what current research suggests. Why? The basic physics is quite fundamental and the background greenhouse effect is necessary for life.
On cooling: yes, many theories simply do not stand the test of time, cooling was one of those. Will GW go the same way? It is possible, but again, one has to examine the strength of the evidence and see if this evidence stands the test of time and challenge. Cooling could not, GW thus far has been quite robust to challenge...from many angles. IPCC reports are a great place to start in looking at that.
Agreed, as a theory it may well stand the test of time. My point was that it may just be too eary to tell. I will concede that my initial comment that GW is a joke was rash. Please allow me to withdraw. I am, and I admit it is due to my skeptisism, not willing to accept something because it is universally considered true. In the 1930's during the depression it was beleived, in a number of quaters, that capitalism was dead.
I am not saying that man made global warming is not POSSIBLE. Just not, as a number of folks seem to beleive, a scientific FACT. As for Gore, you are right. He does not, in any way, deserve credit for this theory. Acadamy Award, fine. And if he can get a bunch of suckers to pay his bloated fee to hear him bloviate, good for him. I was not SURPRISED that he won the Nobel Peace prize since they also saw fit to also award one to Arafat. Just amused.
What data are you aware of? I am aware of quite a bit of independent data supporting the theory. Climate models show theoretical support and can now reconstruct the last 100 year temp records quite well (including the aforementioned bump mid-century). What level of demonstration would you consider sufficient? What do you think is causing the current warming?
This is the key question. What level of proof is required. I don't know. I DO know that it would take MORE than AL Gore and his power point to convince me.
The I would urge you to read the peer-reviewed literature and the recent IPCC report (which is only based on peer-reviewed literature) before concluding that the evidence is insufficient. Skepticism is good (I share it) but skepticism of a politician is an easy target (lol). Examination of reliable, non-political info is a worthy endeavor. That information is quite compelling.
It is a good question although it seems a bit pre-framed......one leads to the other? For me, I would want to carefully examine the costs and benefits to policy decisions on GW. I would also want uncertainty of all aspects included. This has been attempted in many quarters though admittedly there aren't clear answers. My simple thought: take small but targeted steps that mitigate emissions but don't have a net negative on the economy.
Agreed. Measured, thoughtful, targeted steps are a good idea whether dealing with GW or the environment. My fear is that in todays charged, partisal, political climate this is an unlikely outcome. A law or laws will be created without regard to any cost/benefit analysis and for the sake of winning an election people will be hurt.
I can't answer the question as posed. It assumes a linkage and hence is biased in its formation. Perhaps, rephrase?
I think the observational evidence and theoretical underpinnings have moved GW theory to a "strong" theory. Given the potential impacts suggested by the research community, one has to weigh these against the price of doing something.
Linkage was intended because GW has moved rather rapidly from theory to predictions of disaster. As a result solutions have been proposed without regard to cost. An example is the Kyoto Treaty/protocol. In my opinion if this had been ratified it would have been an economic disaster for the U.S. While it was defeated soundly (95-0) it is stll considered a viable option.
I try to stick to the scientific literature on this....predictions of disaster (and the opposite) come from opinion pieces. I would say the theory has strengthened as the scientific evidence supports. As for Kyoto, it actually was defeated. It was ratified by the US - true. How would it have been a disaster exactly? Is there analysis on that?
The fact that you believe that Al Gore pollutes as much as some 3rd-world countries just gives further credence that talk radio, faux news listners like yourself are synonymous with low IQs and and learning disabilities. What a gullible, mentally-challanged loser you are. LOL!
Apparently, you cannot understand sarchasm. As for your childish attacks on my educational background, it is very sad to see you try so hard to pump yourself up by believing that I, and others like myself, have no college education, nor have stable jobs in high positions of importance in a myriad of fields. If we just stuck to the real science of Global Warming your side loses every time. Your response is to resort to name-calling and personal attacks. Pathetic indeed!!!
Anyone who repeats right-wing talking points to the extent that you do can't possibly be educated or well-read. Your unquestioned acceptance of whatever you hear on right-wing tv and radio proves that you lack basic research skills and reasoning ability, the trademarks of a republican, air head, Archie Bunker-type jackass.
And your liberal rhetoric is repetitive and lacking any intelligentice as well. I bet I have more education than you, and it IS in the evironmental sciences....i.e. geology, geography and botany. I used to work for an environmental mitigation/resource management company and am now in health care==radiology.
I believe that I am well-qualified to speak about this topic. You're the liberal talking points purveyor of idiocy! Go back to your mocha latte and clove cigarettes commie-faggot!
Global warming is a sham and most scientists know it. The politicians are using it as a tool, just like terrorism, to fulfill their agenda for one world government and total control of the people.
Watch this video, Global Warming or Global Governance:
like it or not..the nobel prize is the most prestigious prize in the world..and Gore has won it. Also..he is very respected in the whole world except by the republicans in the US. I say Gore has won in his political career, and bush has lost.
As Bob Dylan sings, he probably has God on his side. Mmmm... Why not try and send the American soldiers back home? And care for the wounded and the families of the dead? And don't forget the civilians killed in Iraq, and the American nuclear programs. Then I'll vote him for anything.
The Executive Director of the Nobel Foundation in Sweden, Michael Sohlman, says that it was a mistake by the Norwegian Peace committee, according to the TV channel. "We missed a great Laureate and that's Gandhi. It's a big regret," he said.
this same committe that also gave it to the founder of chinese communism? theyve got ALOT of regretting to do. but thats fine as if a "peace" prize founded by the inventor of DYNAMITE and BALLISTITE wasnt sick enough as it is....
Agreed. Its all about the money and the politics. I wonder if he uses hairspray, drives a car operated by gasoline, eats from plastic containers, etc. This man is a joke. As for him being President, bad move. I am so sick of hearing about him and his political bullshit.
"Al gore wins the prize also won by Yassir arafat and that muhatma ghandi was turned down for FIVE TIMES"
If you're going to repeat a rightwing talking point that makes you look like an asshole, can you at least find out how to spell Gandhi's name? I know you have absolutely no clue who he was (as if rightwingers cared about, or even respected, Gandhi), but when you mindlessly repeat dittohead-bullshit that you don't even understand, it makes you look like even MORE of an asshole.
and if your going to result to grammar checks to shoot me down, since after all spelling is so important on you tube, maybe you should pull a democrat and just concede already.
Global Warming debate reminds me of smoking. They told us for years smoking didnt cause cancer until they were dragged kicking and screaming to the truth
How about the Wine analogy, its good for you, its bad for you, its good for you, its bad for you. The same "scientists" in the past 80 years have gone from global warming to global cooling theories 4 times. P O L I T I C S
Who in the hell EVER said that Al Gore was a scientists who knows what he is talking about. his whole agenda seems to be focussed on money.......Cant trust a man who is focussed on money..
Which makes the people who don't believe it exists just as untrustworthy. Why don't they believe it exists? Because It would cause a dramitic drop in the shit loads of money they are recieving if they took steps to be more eco friendly.
Wow, that takes so much integrity out of that award. Little kids are going to grow up hearing about Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and about how he won the Nobel Peace Prize and they'll think to themselves, "Yeah, but so did Al Gore! Big whoop!" Appearently all you have to do to win is make up a disease and get some two-bit scientists to convince everyone that they have it and that they are to blame and we need government to fix it.
"Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocrities. The latter cannot understand it when a man does not thoughtlessly submit to hereditary prejudices but honestly and courageously uses his intelligence."
My climate dynamics professor told me something different. Maybe you should take a class (something comparable in your area) before you present this as fact. What I took was Climate Dynamics at the Earth and Planetary Sciences Department at UNM. I am sure any major university offers a similar course.
I was very happy that Gore received the Nobel Peace Prize. Over the past few years, he has been spreading awareness about global warming, which is not a hoax, there is scientific evidence. I'm sure that all of the candidates for the award devote their lives' to noble causes, but the fact is, Gore has achieved more in a short amount of time through his (dare I say it) celebrity. "An Inconvenient Truth" inspired me to care about conservation and the way I live. Al Gore for President!
Mike Gravel is inspiring the way I live. I have always been an environmentalist. Sen. Gravel is using his "celebrity" status to get out the information of the NATIONAL INITIATIVE. It is a way for the people to get their gov't back through voting for laws, not just giving your sovereign power away to the gov't on election day. I have not disagreed with one thing he has said in any media.
Anyone who believes Global Warming is fake, is completely ignorant. There is evidence, and it's avaliable to anyone who does there own research. Deciding it's fake up front makes you a moron.
mr gore and peace prize!?? this is one of the most stupid things i have ever heard! that guy pledged for the wor in yugoslavia, Iraq, and war with Iran..bombing of some other countries ....INCREDIBLE!!! peace prize??? ! i just cant believe!!! nobel prize should give inspiration to people around the world, this is just wrong!
Al Gore has done a LOT to promote world peace. He was against invading Iraq from the get-go. I don't understand the sneering remarks that Gore didn't deserve it. We now live in a country that is deplored by the majority of the world - thanks to Bush. I think it's great that in these times an American gets such a prestigious prize - sends a good vibe to the rest of the world. Can you not at least be happy about that?
sincerely the Europeans that they do not love bush in truth do not love America. I council you not to feel opinion of the rest of the world. They do not want good for America.
Czech President Vaclav Klaus is "somewhat surprised" that former US vice president Al Gore received the Nobel Peace Prize.
"The relationship between his activities and world peace is unclear and indistinct." "It rather seems that Gore's doubting of basic cornerstones of the current civilization does not contribute to peace."
Klaus said in a recent speech that environmentalists' efforts to halt global warming "fatally endanger our freedom and prosperity."
Please can anyone explain to me what the hell Al Gore has done to deserve a Nobel Peace Prize? What humanitarian things has he done?! Did you know Nobel gives out a prize for the Envrioment?! Dude... Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Didn't have a Nobel Peace Prize!!!! What justice is there in the world if Dr. King didn't get a Peace Prize and Al Gore did! What has he done for peace?!
Dr. King likely would have won the Peace Prize, except for his untimely death. The Nobel Prizes are awarded only to people currently living. I think there was one exception where the prize was announced, but the recipient died before the actual presentation in Sweden.
As for Al Gore, the Nobel committee decided he deserved it. Case closed.
You are right. Also, a republican or conservative as they sometimes call themselves, will never win a Noble Prize for peace because peace is contrary to their belief system. They are about war, greed, lies and theft. Maybe republicans should invent their own award for the aftformentioned attributes.
Is that the extent of your rebuttal? If it is, then I am not surprised. Uneducated, Archie Bunker-type right-wing blowhards like yourself lack even rudimentary knowledge concerning biology, chemistry, physics, or any life science. In real life, you probably aren't qualified to flip burgers, much less speak about global warming.
I mean there are all kinds of little truths out there, listen to what Al Gore has to say and check your facts. If you find what he is saying to be grossly in error then you now know the truth. But if you find what he's saying is true then perhaps that should trigger something in your mind. Teddy Roosevelt won the Nobel Peace Prize for however said they'd never give it to a Republican.
The Nobel Peace prize was founded by a man once called the "Merchant of Death". He invented dynamite. The title of "Merchant of Death" was given by a reporter that didn't confirm his source information about Alfred Nobel's death. So, a man who was an accomplished chemical engineer wanted a better legacy for himself. So the whole thing was designed to save face in the pages of history, does that make the achievements of its recipient's less significant?
Environmental devastation is not only toxic to our planetary home...it puts the people of our planet at great risk for starvation, disease, slavery, premature death and war.
Vint Cerf and Bob Kahn, the two internet pioneers who developed the basic blueprint for the internet point to Al Gore as having championed the forward momentum of the internet more than any other single elected official...one of today's most powerful tools for democracy.
What I meant to say is...the internet is one of today's most powerful tools for democracy (and Al Gore's efforts to help aid its expansion will have a giant impact on the spread of democracy...hopefully leading to a more peaceful planet).
For refusing to treat poor Medicare patients when he was a doctor, which he did? Hateful people like that don't even have a chance with God let alone The Nobel committee.
What a Joke. First it was Yasser Arafat winning the NPP, ad now Al Gore? What does this have to do with peace? This cheapens the prestige of the honor and makes it a political game prize bestowed by the uninformed.
Republicans (conservatives) will never win a Noble Prize because they are the racists, war-mongers and theives that peace-loving people and nations of the world are fighting against.
Perhaps you are the 'ingorant' one.... Ignorant of Mr.Gore's hypocrisies... Ignorant of the Clinton/Gore administration of reckless bombings of innocent people in Bosnia,Croatia,Yugoslavia to detract attention from Mr. Clinton's sexual improprieties and lies under oath about them.
My response was to wheeler 10, Al Gore is just a puffed up self serving slob, an intellectual marshmellow, with no job and no purpose in life but his endless persuit to see himself in the newspaper.
You are just pissed because you are a trashy, born loser without a single accomplishment to your name, except for maybe "grill cook of the month." Sleep well tonight. You have a long day in the kitchen tomorrow. And I want my coffee hot and my pancakes fresh.
Speak for yourself partner, I feel no need to prove anything to you. If you are gullable enough to worship Al Gore, you can have him. Bend over just a little more and give it all to him. You guys would be like peas and carrots I bet.
You are the one who is gullable, you uneducated piece of shit. You lack basic knowledge about the life and enviromental sciences, yet you still run your shitty mouth, which is run by the biggest polluters on the planet: the oil and gas industry. If you had any intelligence, you would wipe the ky jelly from your hairy knuckles and read some books about the subject instead of chanting your programmed "I hate Al Gore" rant.
Oh god, I just looked at Wheelers site and see that he also worships Michael Moore. I'm sorry wheeler, it must be hard when you have so much hate for you own country. I bet you'd boink Nancy Pelosi too if you had the chance. Come to think of it, maybe I would too, her mind is mush but she's not a bad looking old gal.
Clinton's use of the military was a measured response to the threats that existed at the time. It was not prolonged or exccesive. However, I am sure you vigorously defend bush and his WMDs lies, hence the unlawful invasion of Iraq, and the deaths of untold thousands of Iraqis.
It was the failed presidency of Carter who empowered Iran and then Clinton's stance of deterrence and contianment that was unfocussed and weakened the US and ultimately set the stage for 9/11. It is you my dear wheeler who has a foul mouth, I have not cursed at you, although I did invite you to bend over and let Al Gore have his way with you. I can tell you're an air head, but it takes all kind to make a world. Take care slick.
LOL @ your hopelessly dumb ass! Biased, one-sided American foreign policy is the reason for all the "threats" and hatred today for America. And more wars will never stop it; it will only make war-mongers like bush and co richer. You are nothing but a weak-minded, talk-radio parroting, idiot. You don't have an idea in your head that wasn't put there by limbaugh, hanity and other bullshitters.
See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil. Sit there and drink you double caffinated, half-caff latte while another 9/11 takes place because you think all we need to do is appease muslim extremists and they will go away. Winston Churchill once summed up your sentiments precisely when he said "If you are 25 and not a liberal, you have no heart; and if you a 45 and not a conservative, you have no brain. That's the difference between you and me. Give it up for Gore! I hope he doesn't hurt you.
First of all, all the "lies" that you and your liberal 'comrades' claim are such are the same "lies" that the Dems espoused before 9/11 happened. The invasion WAS LAWFUL under the articles of the U.N. with the U.S. being a charter member of the Security Council. The U.S. has and had the authority to invade after Saddam's disregard of the 17 or so Resolutions.
Since when does war-loving, lie-embracing retards like yourself care what the U.N. says? And if violating U.N. articles was justification for war, then israel should have been invaded decades ago, since it has violated more U.N. resolutions that all the middle-eastern countries combined.
Hmm.. WTF!?! Norway you dropped the ball! Why do we let you give out the prize anyway, swedes wouldnt made this kind of blooper. 1, the guy is an american they are raping countries and he is not doing anything about it. 2, the things he is talking about is not based in facts and its disputed by many scientists. What would we say today if someone had given the prize to the ones talking about global cooling in the 70s?
You sound like a terrible and ignorant human being. I feel sad for you. There are 300 million people in the U.S. Most of them more decent than you. Your comment shows your ignorance and misunderstanding of the world.
wesmanavussucksdick, you cant read or what? I said USA is raping countries. true? yes, then what´s the problem? The prize is ment for people doing something for peace. Showing up and waving your hand at an anti-war rally doesnt do it for me. There were no WMDs in Iraq, no bin laden in Afghanistan, so why are they still there? Al Gore is only contributing to the status que. More imaginary threats is not what the world is needing right now.
You sound like a terrible and ignorant human being. I feel sad for you. There are 300 million people in the U.S. Most of them more decent than you. Your comment shows your ignorance and misunderstanding of the world.
wesmanavussucksdick, I have no problem with americans, do i have to spell out "the leaders of the USA is raping countries" everytime for you to understand what I´m talking about. Only 500 words. Anyways I think the prize should go to Ron Paul, an american, that is actually trying to stop the wars, there you have it.
So-called "illegals" are not living off you. They come here, work hard and save their money and become succesful, loyal citizens. You are just angry because you are a born loser who has had every advantage and opportunity one can have and have failed miserably. You would still be a failure even if there were no "illegals" in this country, so find some other group to blame for your fuckups.
"Your laws?" Bitch, your ancestors came from europe and stole the land you now call america. This land wasn't yours to begin with. So-called illegals didn't cross "your" boarders, your aquired-by-theft boarders crossed them.
My great-great grandmother was 100% Cherokee you fucking idiot!!! It's sad that Native American people couldn't fight back the European invaders, but that's history. Now, as one people, with one Constitution to guide us, we have laws to abide by that protect and define us as a people. By the way, didn't you know that there is no "a" in "borders?" Again, "Sir, you're a Moron!"
Nobel himself is an American--- do you think all Americans are responsible for and support this catastrophe in Iraq? What do you expect Gore to do, strap a machine gun across his back and declare war against the U.S? There is only 'one' scientist of any note who believes against all scientific fact and reason that global warming isn't occurring: Timothy Ball. The rest of the disagreement is simply on technical details of how it is occurring.
It really illustrates the complexity and the folly of labeling all Americans this way. Since Nobel was born in Sweden, established the United States Blasting Oil Company in the U.S. In 1870, and also died in Italy. Are you Mexican if you're born in Mexico, and migrate to the U.S? Was he Italian because he lived and died in Italy?
It is possible Al Gore has been given the ALBERT Nobel Prize in order to distract people from a possible strike on IRAN and Palestine and Syria. This is most disgusting because as Vice President he was earning a salary! Seems like the idea is to pull away Ron Paul voters to Hillary Clinton because she'll continue the WAR in Palestine and impose idiotic neverending talks(Clinton style).
Wow SasssyBratt, I'd bet any amount of money that you watch FOX news. Because only a moron could call Gore a hypocrite for paying in access of $1200 a month for his green power program, drives a hybrid, and has outfitted his home in solar panels. So what gives you the right to throw stones aside from your free speech? I'm going to assume the real hypocrite here is you.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Al Gore is a "Champagne Socialist". One who pontificates to the masses about how they should live and behave while being a total hypocrite in respect to his own life. This guy is raking in millions on the lecture circuit as the face of "Saint Save the World" while flying on private jets instead of "jet pooling". CHAMPAGNE SOCIALIST - definition on Wikipedia.
you do realize that he doesn't ahve to do any of this.. with the amount of money he's made he could just sit back and live off interest for the rest of his life. But he cares deeply about this issue, he devotes more time to this issue than i can be you spend at work.. or by the way you're talking.. at school... so stop talking about something you known nothing about... and besides the issue isnt the messanger, its the message, why don't people see that
This has been flagged as spam show
ANTARCTIC ICE GROWS TO RECORD SIZE
It is now at 16.17 million sq. km.
The old record is 16.03 million sq. km
And the Antarctic is still growing.
According to Al Gore's predictions this wasn't supposed to happen.
Now the alarmists are saying only SEA ICE (yes they capitalize it) is growing as if some how it's warmer over land in Antarctica and the ice is melting there. But its land ice gets thicker every year for 1000's of years now. Yearly snow compresses underlying snow into ice
MagentaTrue 3 years ago
we need Al Gore for president!
so he can search for manbearpig and destroy him..
victorshizzle 4 years ago
Yippee, Al Gore rocks and everyone knows it.
foxieroxie51 4 years ago
We need Al Gore as our next President.
OneoftheImmortals 4 years ago 2
oh good lets elect the biggest liar of all time to lead this nation. search (HOTTER SUN) or(ITS THE SUN STUPID). find truth and do your research.
densefawg 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
al gores a dick
phyuk 4 years ago
Smart and good Comment...
pegelatrin 4 years ago
I am SO glad this doofus isn't president. Thank you, God.
fruticetum 4 years ago
Al Gore wins the Nobel Prize? For what? Global warming is a joke. Like Al Gore winning the Nobel Prize. It's almost as funny as Bill O'Reilly writing a book for kids about sex or electing Bill Clinton President. Who says God doesn't have a sense of homor.
ufund 4 years ago
Ufund,
On what do you base your statement, "Global warming is a joke." Thanks.
thegurnman 4 years ago
Global warming is an interesting theory, NOT FACT. Example: Carbon dioxide HAS increased in the past century due to fossil fuels and the avg. global temp has increased 0.8 degrees in the same period. HOWEVER most of that temp increase came BEFORE 1940. Most new carbon dioxide was added AFTER 1960. I'm just suspicious of a failed politicion charging $100K for a speach about armageddon.
ufund 4 years ago
It is indeed a theory, as is gravity. There are very few things in science considered facts: Newton's Law, 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics, etc. A short list. Global warming is considered a "strong" theory: it has held up to multiple lines of observational evidence.......not just the observed temperature record but additional independent lines of evidence.
thegurnman 4 years ago
Furthermore, you are incorrect in your assertion that most of the warming was prior to 1940 though indeed some of the warming over the last 100 years did occur prior to 1940. The "bump" in the global mean temperature record is well-explained by the known cooling from sulfate aerosols. Models show this quite well.
thegurnman 4 years ago
Finally, I wouldn't get too sidetracked by Gore. It is the peer-reviewed literature that is the most reliable source of what is known about this problem. Al Gore is just communicating what he has read and heard. The IPCC is far more deserving of this award and it is that work that the public should look to rather than Gore's comments. Thanks.
thegurnman 4 years ago
MANY things in science are considered fact. Gravity IS a fact and is demonstratable. Lets assume that global warming is a 'strong' theory. It is not YET demonstrable. A number of scientists agree that there is not enough data, AT THIS TIME, to support the theory that man is responsable for the planet warming. The planet has warmed AND cooled many times without any help from man. This is a fact.
ufund 4 years ago
Sorry, but in scientific parlance, gravity is a theory (see any introductory physics textbook). My point is that nobody would question this theory because it is as close to scientific fact as one gets without actually being one. GW is indeed not to the level of gravity, but it is supported by a considerable amount of theoretical foundation and observational data. The scientific community that actually engages in climate science overwhelmingly supports the IPCC statements on climate change.
thegurnman 4 years ago
OK, I will beleive Gravity is a theory and not an absolue fact when I start flying around this room. GW was first esposed as a 'theory' in 1958. In the 1970's Time magazine ran a cover story warning of Global Cooling. I assume there were a number of scientisis who agreed with THAT theory.
ufund 4 years ago
I think you are misunderstanding how a scientist uses the word "theory" - quite different from the layperson. I am merely trying to point out that much of what we know is scientifically considered theory.....some are just more developed than others. GW is not as developed or supported as gravity but that does not mean it is a random whim either. It has a foundation and supporting evidence.
thegurnman 4 years ago
But leave that aside. Actually, the theory was put forward in 1898 by Svante Arrhenius. Suggested that a doubling of CO2 would cause a 5 C rise......not so far from what current research suggests. Why? The basic physics is quite fundamental and the background greenhouse effect is necessary for life.
thegurnman 4 years ago
On cooling: yes, many theories simply do not stand the test of time, cooling was one of those. Will GW go the same way? It is possible, but again, one has to examine the strength of the evidence and see if this evidence stands the test of time and challenge. Cooling could not, GW thus far has been quite robust to challenge...from many angles. IPCC reports are a great place to start in looking at that.
thegurnman 4 years ago
Agreed, as a theory it may well stand the test of time. My point was that it may just be too eary to tell. I will concede that my initial comment that GW is a joke was rash. Please allow me to withdraw. I am, and I admit it is due to my skeptisism, not willing to accept something because it is universally considered true. In the 1930's during the depression it was beleived, in a number of quaters, that capitalism was dead.
ufund 4 years ago
I am not saying that man made global warming is not POSSIBLE. Just not, as a number of folks seem to beleive, a scientific FACT. As for Gore, you are right. He does not, in any way, deserve credit for this theory. Acadamy Award, fine. And if he can get a bunch of suckers to pay his bloated fee to hear him bloviate, good for him. I was not SURPRISED that he won the Nobel Peace prize since they also saw fit to also award one to Arafat. Just amused.
ufund 4 years ago
What data are you aware of? I am aware of quite a bit of independent data supporting the theory. Climate models show theoretical support and can now reconstruct the last 100 year temp records quite well (including the aforementioned bump mid-century). What level of demonstration would you consider sufficient? What do you think is causing the current warming?
thegurnman 4 years ago
This is the key question. What level of proof is required. I don't know. I DO know that it would take MORE than AL Gore and his power point to convince me.
ufund 4 years ago
The I would urge you to read the peer-reviewed literature and the recent IPCC report (which is only based on peer-reviewed literature) before concluding that the evidence is insufficient. Skepticism is good (I share it) but skepticism of a politician is an easy target (lol). Examination of reliable, non-political info is a worthy endeavor. That information is quite compelling.
thegurnman 4 years ago
Another question, Is there sufficient proof that Global Warming is real to alter, dramatically, the Global Economy?
ufund 4 years ago
One more question, Are you sufficiantly convinced about Global Warming to alter the Global Economy?
ufund 4 years ago
sorry for the repeat.
ufund 4 years ago
It is a good question although it seems a bit pre-framed......one leads to the other? For me, I would want to carefully examine the costs and benefits to policy decisions on GW. I would also want uncertainty of all aspects included. This has been attempted in many quarters though admittedly there aren't clear answers. My simple thought: take small but targeted steps that mitigate emissions but don't have a net negative on the economy.
thegurnman 4 years ago
Agreed. Measured, thoughtful, targeted steps are a good idea whether dealing with GW or the environment. My fear is that in todays charged, partisal, political climate this is an unlikely outcome. A law or laws will be created without regard to any cost/benefit analysis and for the sake of winning an election people will be hurt.
ufund 4 years ago
The question is are YOU sufficiently convinced enough to disrupt the Global Economy?
ufund 4 years ago
I can't answer the question as posed. It assumes a linkage and hence is biased in its formation. Perhaps, rephrase?
I think the observational evidence and theoretical underpinnings have moved GW theory to a "strong" theory. Given the potential impacts suggested by the research community, one has to weigh these against the price of doing something.
thegurnman 4 years ago
Linkage was intended because GW has moved rather rapidly from theory to predictions of disaster. As a result solutions have been proposed without regard to cost. An example is the Kyoto Treaty/protocol. In my opinion if this had been ratified it would have been an economic disaster for the U.S. While it was defeated soundly (95-0) it is stll considered a viable option.
ufund 4 years ago
I try to stick to the scientific literature on this....predictions of disaster (and the opposite) come from opinion pieces. I would say the theory has strengthened as the scientific evidence supports. As for Kyoto, it actually was defeated. It was ratified by the US - true. How would it have been a disaster exactly? Is there analysis on that?
thegurnman 4 years ago
Last post should have said:
"As for Kyoto, it actually was not defeated. It has gone into force for those countries that ratified it. It was not ratified by the US - true"
contractions appear not to work (or I can not type).
thegurnman 4 years ago
I wonder if Al's jet planes, SUVs, Limos, and multiple large homes run on Green energy? He pollutes about as much as some 3rd-world countries!!!
TriggerJunkie 4 years ago
The fact that you believe that Al Gore pollutes as much as some 3rd-world countries just gives further credence that talk radio, faux news listners like yourself are synonymous with low IQs and and learning disabilities. What a gullible, mentally-challanged loser you are. LOL!
wheeler10 4 years ago
Apparently, you cannot understand sarchasm. As for your childish attacks on my educational background, it is very sad to see you try so hard to pump yourself up by believing that I, and others like myself, have no college education, nor have stable jobs in high positions of importance in a myriad of fields. If we just stuck to the real science of Global Warming your side loses every time. Your response is to resort to name-calling and personal attacks. Pathetic indeed!!!
TriggerJunkie 4 years ago
Anyone who repeats right-wing talking points to the extent that you do can't possibly be educated or well-read. Your unquestioned acceptance of whatever you hear on right-wing tv and radio proves that you lack basic research skills and reasoning ability, the trademarks of a republican, air head, Archie Bunker-type jackass.
wheeler10 4 years ago
And your liberal rhetoric is repetitive and lacking any intelligentice as well. I bet I have more education than you, and it IS in the evironmental sciences....i.e. geology, geography and botany. I used to work for an environmental mitigation/resource management company and am now in health care==radiology.
I believe that I am well-qualified to speak about this topic. You're the liberal talking points purveyor of idiocy! Go back to your mocha latte and clove cigarettes commie-faggot!
TriggerJunkie 4 years ago
There is right-wing TV and radio? Where might I go to see that; I thought the liberals held the media. We just can't count on anything, anymore.
Man, this argument is really tapping into the cliches very well. i.e., mocha-lattes and Archie Bunker.
Keep up the good work, guys!
octavius13 4 years ago
Global warming is a sham and most scientists know it. The politicians are using it as a tool, just like terrorism, to fulfill their agenda for one world government and total control of the people.
Watch this video, Global Warming or Global Governance:
video.google. com/videoplay?docid=4860344067427439443
Also Global Warming: Doomsday Called Off
watch?v=fr5O1HsTVgA
themeekshallrule 4 years ago
MANBEARPIG
highlands 4 years ago
like it or not..the nobel prize is the most prestigious prize in the world..and Gore has won it. Also..he is very respected in the whole world except by the republicans in the US. I say Gore has won in his political career, and bush has lost.
Deathshed0887 4 years ago
As Bob Dylan sings, he probably has God on his side. Mmmm... Why not try and send the American soldiers back home? And care for the wounded and the families of the dead? And don't forget the civilians killed in Iraq, and the American nuclear programs. Then I'll vote him for anything.
nigulat 4 years ago
The Executive Director of the Nobel Foundation in Sweden, Michael Sohlman, says that it was a mistake by the Norwegian Peace committee, according to the TV channel. "We missed a great Laureate and that's Gandhi. It's a big regret," he said.
cart00nhero 4 years ago
this same committe that also gave it to the founder of chinese communism? theyve got ALOT of regretting to do. but thats fine as if a "peace" prize founded by the inventor of DYNAMITE and BALLISTITE wasnt sick enough as it is....
VonSpyder 4 years ago
Agreed. Its all about the money and the politics. I wonder if he uses hairspray, drives a car operated by gasoline, eats from plastic containers, etc. This man is a joke. As for him being President, bad move. I am so sick of hearing about him and his political bullshit.
kleo8577 4 years ago
CNN is joke
and so is gore
hannahk43 4 years ago
Al gore wins the prize also won by Yassir arafat and that muhatma ghandi was turned down for FIVE TIMES. yeah big shock. Al gore is a tool.
VonSpyder 4 years ago
"Al gore wins the prize also won by Yassir arafat and that muhatma ghandi was turned down for FIVE TIMES"
If you're going to repeat a rightwing talking point that makes you look like an asshole, can you at least find out how to spell Gandhi's name? I know you have absolutely no clue who he was (as if rightwingers cared about, or even respected, Gandhi), but when you mindlessly repeat dittohead-bullshit that you don't even understand, it makes you look like even MORE of an asshole.
HNK222 4 years ago
Gandhi was nuts, "throw yourselves from the cliffs", "give into the Nazis", both great ideas (s l o w c l a p)
highlands 4 years ago
and if your going to result to grammar checks to shoot me down, since after all spelling is so important on you tube, maybe you should pull a democrat and just concede already.
VonSpyder 3 years ago
Why did that fat abbot win the peace prize anyway?
moij1 4 years ago
Global Warming debate reminds me of smoking. They told us for years smoking didnt cause cancer until they were dragged kicking and screaming to the truth
swilkerson73 4 years ago
How about the Wine analogy, its good for you, its bad for you, its good for you, its bad for you. The same "scientists" in the past 80 years have gone from global warming to global cooling theories 4 times. P O L I T I C S
JLaw012 4 years ago
Al Gore loves the enviroment and all he's telling us is the planet is having going thru a warming cycle.
Nothing new keep moving.
RideOnHardOn 4 years ago
Al Gore is a joke.
chadlingoc 4 years ago
Who in the hell EVER said that Al Gore was a scientists who knows what he is talking about. his whole agenda seems to be focussed on money.......Cant trust a man who is focussed on money..
kalvinphil 4 years ago
Which makes the people who don't believe it exists just as untrustworthy. Why don't they believe it exists? Because It would cause a dramitic drop in the shit loads of money they are recieving if they took steps to be more eco friendly.
mytoeismissindarnit 4 years ago 2
Wow, that takes so much integrity out of that award. Little kids are going to grow up hearing about Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and about how he won the Nobel Peace Prize and they'll think to themselves, "Yeah, but so did Al Gore! Big whoop!" Appearently all you have to do to win is make up a disease and get some two-bit scientists to convince everyone that they have it and that they are to blame and we need government to fix it.
eatbug007 4 years ago
I'd call you a retard, but that would make retards look bad.
agentpissant42 4 years ago
OOOooo wow, nothing like a little strawman arguement to get the discussion going. How about some facts. OOPS, aren't any.
eatbug007 4 years ago
like agentpissant42 said there... yes mental retardation is your main problem
pnx031 4 years ago
"Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocrities. The latter cannot understand it when a man does not thoughtlessly submit to hereditary prejudices but honestly and courageously uses his intelligence."
-Albert Einstein
L8nitedave 4 years ago
Global warming exists but it is not at the hand of humans...these temperatures appear to be cyclical. Google "PETM" and tell me what you find.
JustKozz 4 years ago
Really, doctor?
wesmanavussucksdick 4 years ago
My climate dynamics professor told me something different. Maybe you should take a class (something comparable in your area) before you present this as fact. What I took was Climate Dynamics at the Earth and Planetary Sciences Department at UNM. I am sure any major university offers a similar course.
zargorn 4 years ago
Let's bomb the middle east back to the stone age.
OBAMA 2008!
obamaforpresodint 4 years ago
(Huckit) Is that really your response to my comment? HA! Use your imagination next time; I dare you.
rialou22 4 years ago
nice carmex
Huckit 4 years ago
hahaha the last line
ISmellLikeASexyGuy 4 years ago
I was very happy that Gore received the Nobel Peace Prize. Over the past few years, he has been spreading awareness about global warming, which is not a hoax, there is scientific evidence. I'm sure that all of the candidates for the award devote their lives' to noble causes, but the fact is, Gore has achieved more in a short amount of time through his (dare I say it) celebrity. "An Inconvenient Truth" inspired me to care about conservation and the way I live. Al Gore for President!
rialou22 4 years ago
Mike Gravel is inspiring the way I live. I have always been an environmentalist. Sen. Gravel is using his "celebrity" status to get out the information of the NATIONAL INITIATIVE. It is a way for the people to get their gov't back through voting for laws, not just giving your sovereign power away to the gov't on election day. I have not disagreed with one thing he has said in any media.
s0ngcatcher 4 years ago
Shut up Rialou you idiot.
Huckit 4 years ago
Anyone who believes Global Warming is fake, is completely ignorant. There is evidence, and it's avaliable to anyone who does there own research. Deciding it's fake up front makes you a moron.
wwedotcom04 4 years ago 6
mr gore and peace prize!?? this is one of the most stupid things i have ever heard! that guy pledged for the wor in yugoslavia, Iraq, and war with Iran..bombing of some other countries ....INCREDIBLE!!! peace prize??? ! i just cant believe!!! nobel prize should give inspiration to people around the world, this is just wrong!
mediteraneus 4 years ago
hey i hate america because i hate bush and the funny thing is im american haha
nodogyougay48 4 years ago
George W. Bush probably thinks Al Gore won the 'Noble' Prize.
neponsetriver 4 years ago
good one!
pellebravesskylar 4 years ago
thats bull that he won
soggy455555 4 years ago
Al Gore has done a LOT to promote world peace. He was against invading Iraq from the get-go. I don't understand the sneering remarks that Gore didn't deserve it. We now live in a country that is deplored by the majority of the world - thanks to Bush. I think it's great that in these times an American gets such a prestigious prize - sends a good vibe to the rest of the world. Can you not at least be happy about that?
pellebravesskylar 4 years ago
I love America and I love Bush.
sincerely the Europeans that they do not love bush in truth do not love America. I council you not to feel opinion of the rest of the world. They do not want good for America.
rinaltube 4 years ago
Well, since you can't spell, it's no wonder you love Shrub.
pellebravesskylar 4 years ago
Now I know that the Peace Prize is a total sham. What peace did Algore ever bring to the world?
miraclay 4 years ago
it is hard to imagine anything more silly
athensathens 4 years ago
Czech President Vaclav Klaus is "somewhat surprised" that former US vice president Al Gore received the Nobel Peace Prize.
"The relationship between his activities and world peace is unclear and indistinct." "It rather seems that Gore's doubting of basic cornerstones of the current civilization does not contribute to peace."
Klaus said in a recent speech that environmentalists' efforts to halt global warming "fatally endanger our freedom and prosperity."
murrayrothstein 4 years ago 2
Please can anyone explain to me what the hell Al Gore has done to deserve a Nobel Peace Prize? What humanitarian things has he done?! Did you know Nobel gives out a prize for the Envrioment?! Dude... Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Didn't have a Nobel Peace Prize!!!! What justice is there in the world if Dr. King didn't get a Peace Prize and Al Gore did! What has he done for peace?!
slashermerc 4 years ago
Dr. King likely would have won the Peace Prize, except for his untimely death. The Nobel Prizes are awarded only to people currently living. I think there was one exception where the prize was announced, but the recipient died before the actual presentation in Sweden.
As for Al Gore, the Nobel committee decided he deserved it. Case closed.
neponsetriver 4 years ago
You are right. Also, a republican or conservative as they sometimes call themselves, will never win a Noble Prize for peace because peace is contrary to their belief system. They are about war, greed, lies and theft. Maybe republicans should invent their own award for the aftformentioned attributes.
wheeler10 4 years ago
You sir, are a Moron!
TriggerJunkie 4 years ago
-The comment "You sir, are a Moron!" was directed to Wheeler10 and all those like him.
TriggerJunkie 4 years ago
"You sir, are a moron."
Is that the extent of your rebuttal? If it is, then I am not surprised. Uneducated, Archie Bunker-type right-wing blowhards like yourself lack even rudimentary knowledge concerning biology, chemistry, physics, or any life science. In real life, you probably aren't qualified to flip burgers, much less speak about global warming.
wheeler10 4 years ago
Diabolical.
UpBeforeSunrise 4 years ago
I mean there are all kinds of little truths out there, listen to what Al Gore has to say and check your facts. If you find what he is saying to be grossly in error then you now know the truth. But if you find what he's saying is true then perhaps that should trigger something in your mind. Teddy Roosevelt won the Nobel Peace Prize for however said they'd never give it to a Republican.
gasergeant 4 years ago
The Nobel Peace prize was founded by a man once called the "Merchant of Death". He invented dynamite. The title of "Merchant of Death" was given by a reporter that didn't confirm his source information about Alfred Nobel's death. So, a man who was an accomplished chemical engineer wanted a better legacy for himself. So the whole thing was designed to save face in the pages of history, does that make the achievements of its recipient's less significant?
gasergeant 4 years ago
just won cuz is american.. its all!!
bravo for this "nobel" 0.o
Selassei69 4 years ago
Congratulations Al Gore!
Environmental devastation is not only toxic to our planetary home...it puts the people of our planet at great risk for starvation, disease, slavery, premature death and war.
Vint Cerf and Bob Kahn, the two internet pioneers who developed the basic blueprint for the internet point to Al Gore as having championed the forward momentum of the internet more than any other single elected official...one of today's most powerful tools for democracy.
sharonafox1 4 years ago
What I meant to say is...the internet is one of today's most powerful tools for democracy (and Al Gore's efforts to help aid its expansion will have a giant impact on the spread of democracy...hopefully leading to a more peaceful planet).
sharonafox1 4 years ago
Ron Paul should win the Nobel peace prize!
UpBeforeSunrise 4 years ago
For what?
For refusing to treat poor Medicare patients when he was a doctor, which he did? Hateful people like that don't even have a chance with God let alone The Nobel committee.
ImAstraios 4 years ago
Al Gore winning Prize...TOTALLY POLITICAL!! TOTALLY!!
glenmyrtle 4 years ago
What a Joke. First it was Yasser Arafat winning the NPP, ad now Al Gore? What does this have to do with peace? This cheapens the prestige of the honor and makes it a political game prize bestowed by the uninformed.
Stratman1920 4 years ago
Republicans (conservatives) will never win a Noble Prize because they are the racists, war-mongers and theives that peace-loving people and nations of the world are fighting against.
wheeler10 4 years ago
I'm sorry that you are ignorant, but have a nice day anyway.
Stratman1920 4 years ago 3
Perhaps you are the 'ingorant' one.... Ignorant of Mr.Gore's hypocrisies... Ignorant of the Clinton/Gore administration of reckless bombings of innocent people in Bosnia,Croatia,Yugoslavia to detract attention from Mr. Clinton's sexual improprieties and lies under oath about them.
TriggerJunkie 4 years ago 2
My response was to wheeler 10, Al Gore is just a puffed up self serving slob, an intellectual marshmellow, with no job and no purpose in life but his endless persuit to see himself in the newspaper.
Stratman1920 4 years ago 2
You are just pissed because you are a trashy, born loser without a single accomplishment to your name, except for maybe "grill cook of the month." Sleep well tonight. You have a long day in the kitchen tomorrow. And I want my coffee hot and my pancakes fresh.
wheeler10 4 years ago
Speak for yourself partner, I feel no need to prove anything to you. If you are gullable enough to worship Al Gore, you can have him. Bend over just a little more and give it all to him. You guys would be like peas and carrots I bet.
Stratman1920 4 years ago
You are the one who is gullable, you uneducated piece of shit. You lack basic knowledge about the life and enviromental sciences, yet you still run your shitty mouth, which is run by the biggest polluters on the planet: the oil and gas industry. If you had any intelligence, you would wipe the ky jelly from your hairy knuckles and read some books about the subject instead of chanting your programmed "I hate Al Gore" rant.
wheeler10 4 years ago
Oh god, I just looked at Wheelers site and see that he also worships Michael Moore. I'm sorry wheeler, it must be hard when you have so much hate for you own country. I bet you'd boink Nancy Pelosi too if you had the chance. Come to think of it, maybe I would too, her mind is mush but she's not a bad looking old gal.
Stratman1920 4 years ago
You would bang Nancy Pelosi? Don't tell your blow-up doll; it would become quite jealous I am sure.
I don't hate my country. I hate the administration that is ruining my country.
wheeler10 4 years ago
Clinton's use of the military was a measured response to the threats that existed at the time. It was not prolonged or exccesive. However, I am sure you vigorously defend bush and his WMDs lies, hence the unlawful invasion of Iraq, and the deaths of untold thousands of Iraqis.
wheeler10 4 years ago
It was the failed presidency of Carter who empowered Iran and then Clinton's stance of deterrence and contianment that was unfocussed and weakened the US and ultimately set the stage for 9/11. It is you my dear wheeler who has a foul mouth, I have not cursed at you, although I did invite you to bend over and let Al Gore have his way with you. I can tell you're an air head, but it takes all kind to make a world. Take care slick.
Stratman1920 4 years ago
LOL @ your hopelessly dumb ass! Biased, one-sided American foreign policy is the reason for all the "threats" and hatred today for America. And more wars will never stop it; it will only make war-mongers like bush and co richer. You are nothing but a weak-minded, talk-radio parroting, idiot. You don't have an idea in your head that wasn't put there by limbaugh, hanity and other bullshitters.
wheeler10 4 years ago 2
obviously a useless exchange here, later dude.
beachangel83 4 years ago
See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil. Sit there and drink you double caffinated, half-caff latte while another 9/11 takes place because you think all we need to do is appease muslim extremists and they will go away. Winston Churchill once summed up your sentiments precisely when he said "If you are 25 and not a liberal, you have no heart; and if you a 45 and not a conservative, you have no brain. That's the difference between you and me. Give it up for Gore! I hope he doesn't hurt you.
Stratman1920 4 years ago
First of all, all the "lies" that you and your liberal 'comrades' claim are such are the same "lies" that the Dems espoused before 9/11 happened. The invasion WAS LAWFUL under the articles of the U.N. with the U.S. being a charter member of the Security Council. The U.S. has and had the authority to invade after Saddam's disregard of the 17 or so Resolutions.
TriggerJunkie 4 years ago
Since when does war-loving, lie-embracing retards like yourself care what the U.N. says? And if violating U.N. articles was justification for war, then israel should have been invaded decades ago, since it has violated more U.N. resolutions that all the middle-eastern countries combined.
wheeler10 4 years ago
The defense of Israel is paramount to the U.S.' receiving of blessings from God! Those who bless Israel shall in-return be blessed!
TriggerJunkie 4 years ago
Hmm.. WTF!?! Norway you dropped the ball! Why do we let you give out the prize anyway, swedes wouldnt made this kind of blooper. 1, the guy is an american they are raping countries and he is not doing anything about it. 2, the things he is talking about is not based in facts and its disputed by many scientists. What would we say today if someone had given the prize to the ones talking about global cooling in the 70s?
0bn0x10u2 4 years ago
There are 300 million people in the U.S.
wesmanavussucksdick 4 years ago
Yes, and this is a reply to my message how? Dont reply with pointless rubbish please. I didnt understand anything about your other message eather.
0bn0x10u2 4 years ago
You sound like a terrible and ignorant human being. I feel sad for you. There are 300 million people in the U.S. Most of them more decent than you. Your comment shows your ignorance and misunderstanding of the world.
Peace
wesmanavussucksdick 4 years ago
wesmanavussucksdick, you cant read or what? I said USA is raping countries. true? yes, then what´s the problem? The prize is ment for people doing something for peace. Showing up and waving your hand at an anti-war rally doesnt do it for me. There were no WMDs in Iraq, no bin laden in Afghanistan, so why are they still there? Al Gore is only contributing to the status que. More imaginary threats is not what the world is needing right now.
0bn0x10u2 4 years ago
You sound like a terrible and ignorant human being. I feel sad for you. There are 300 million people in the U.S. Most of them more decent than you. Your comment shows your ignorance and misunderstanding of the world.
Peace
wesmanavussucksdick 4 years ago
wesmanavussucksdick, I have no problem with americans, do i have to spell out "the leaders of the USA is raping countries" everytime for you to understand what I´m talking about. Only 500 words. Anyways I think the prize should go to Ron Paul, an american, that is actually trying to stop the wars, there you have it.
0bn0x10u2 4 years ago
yes, and about 15-20+ million are illegals living-off the rest of us and using our system for their advantage.
TriggerJunkie 4 years ago
So-called "illegals" are not living off you. They come here, work hard and save their money and become succesful, loyal citizens. You are just angry because you are a born loser who has had every advantage and opportunity one can have and have failed miserably. You would still be a failure even if there were no "illegals" in this country, so find some other group to blame for your fuckups.
wheeler10 4 years ago
Illegals are not worthy of citizenship here since they disregard our law from the start.
TriggerJunkie 4 years ago
"Your laws?" Bitch, your ancestors came from europe and stole the land you now call america. This land wasn't yours to begin with. So-called illegals didn't cross "your" boarders, your aquired-by-theft boarders crossed them.
wheeler10 4 years ago
My great-great grandmother was 100% Cherokee you fucking idiot!!! It's sad that Native American people couldn't fight back the European invaders, but that's history. Now, as one people, with one Constitution to guide us, we have laws to abide by that protect and define us as a people. By the way, didn't you know that there is no "a" in "borders?" Again, "Sir, you're a Moron!"
TriggerJunkie 4 years ago
Nobel himself is an American--- do you think all Americans are responsible for and support this catastrophe in Iraq? What do you expect Gore to do, strap a machine gun across his back and declare war against the U.S? There is only 'one' scientist of any note who believes against all scientific fact and reason that global warming isn't occurring: Timothy Ball. The rest of the disagreement is simply on technical details of how it is occurring.
Krrplunk 4 years ago
ummm... Nobel was Swedish last time I checked...
razzark666 4 years ago
It really illustrates the complexity and the folly of labeling all Americans this way. Since Nobel was born in Sweden, established the United States Blasting Oil Company in the U.S. In 1870, and also died in Italy. Are you Mexican if you're born in Mexico, and migrate to the U.S? Was he Italian because he lived and died in Italy?
Krrplunk 4 years ago
Congratulations to Al Gore. He deserves it!!! I wish he would run for president!!! He would win this time!!!
vjs0902 4 years ago 4
I hope he does run, that will further divide the democrats and make it easier for another Republican to win office. Go Al Gore.
Stratman1920 4 years ago
It is possible Al Gore has been given the ALBERT Nobel Prize in order to distract people from a possible strike on IRAN and Palestine and Syria. This is most disgusting because as Vice President he was earning a salary! Seems like the idea is to pull away Ron Paul voters to Hillary Clinton because she'll continue the WAR in Palestine and impose idiotic neverending talks(Clinton style).
adikiny 4 years ago
good for you al gore..you are the greatest!!!
VISABUN12 4 years ago
Nobel Prize is like the UN... #!@**
rinaltube 4 years ago
the apple in politics. I more will not buy produced of the apple. I will buy the products of the pear :-(
elleUenneA 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
OMG, even after approving the burning and slaughter of 100's of children in Waco, Texas, now he gets this-wow this world is in deep trouble!
ChrisReevesHorse 4 years ago
Wow SasssyBratt, I'd bet any amount of money that you watch FOX news. Because only a moron could call Gore a hypocrite for paying in access of $1200 a month for his green power program, drives a hybrid, and has outfitted his home in solar panels. So what gives you the right to throw stones aside from your free speech? I'm going to assume the real hypocrite here is you.
dukesmaviddicky 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Al Gore is a "Champagne Socialist". One who pontificates to the masses about how they should live and behave while being a total hypocrite in respect to his own life. This guy is raking in millions on the lecture circuit as the face of "Saint Save the World" while flying on private jets instead of "jet pooling". CHAMPAGNE SOCIALIST - definition on Wikipedia.
SasssyBrattt 4 years ago
you do realize that he doesn't ahve to do any of this.. with the amount of money he's made he could just sit back and live off interest for the rest of his life. But he cares deeply about this issue, he devotes more time to this issue than i can be you spend at work.. or by the way you're talking.. at school... so stop talking about something you known nothing about... and besides the issue isnt the messanger, its the message, why don't people see that
putaleche 4 years ago 2
I guess if you are successful in life and you stand up for anybody but other rich people, you are a hypocrite. YOU ARE DUMB!
wesmanavussucksdick 4 years ago
Congratulation Al Gore!
baluchi80 4 years ago 12
Gore is one of the few american policy makers that strike me as sane and non-sleazy. Actualy only him and Edwards.
U5K0 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What a JOKE!
mnorthrop1 4 years ago
Very Good.
DralionProductions 4 years ago 2