Added: 7 months ago
From: joomla
Views: 6,015
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (12)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • this is one reason open-source sucks, sometimes it's best to just pay for something to get quality

  • Why, why, why would you ruin a popular CMS by constantly making web builders go through this hassle of redoing their sites every 6 months.. The constant headaches of getting your third party add-ons and custom templates to be in sync and update with this is so frustrating, that i"m too the point of leaving Joomla permantely and migrate back to Wordpress! I've never had so many headaches with any other CMS before.. It's also extremely expensive, especially when GPL licenses must be repurchased

  • Does it really matter if we skip number versions? I mean it's just a number and going to 2.5 now (since it'll be a long term release) really makes sense.

  • well explained! thankx

  • what happen with 6.7.8,8 numbers ?

    WHY U DIDN"T TELL IT BEFORE :L))) IN THE JOOMLA HOME PAGE

    i get too much @#$% in last year 1.5->1.6->1.7

  • I vote 2.5, where do we go to vote officially?

  • Love it, thanks Ron and Sandy

  • why the heck did they NOT give 1.6 the version 2.0? Would have saved a lot of headache

  • 2.5 is the best option ;) for the new and great release circle.

  • Just do the 2.5

  • My vote is for 2.5 because the confusion, if any (nearly impossible after seeing this video), will only be short-term but will begin the process of communicating the new time-based development cycle, understanding which is more important, right away.

  • How bad would the code effect extensions and templates based on ST or LT?

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more