@CoreyPerrySucks shows how much you know about hockey by having a name that is corey Perry Sucks when he is easily one of the best forwards in the game..... Chelsea dagger and the Ranger's goal song ar ethe two BEST goal songs in the NHL and that is widely known and accepted.
@redwingsmike3718 Well actually I'm a Rangers fan, and I don't mind CD really, because when I heard it last year in the SCF games played in Chicago, it meant the Hawks had scored on the Flyers. And yeah, CD is probably the most hated song of both the Canucks players and their fans.
@jmanstar24 Not sure Detroit will have time to own the hawks next season...most of your guys will be to busy applying for social security. Hope none of those oldies have a heart attack before the season comes to a close
@Kartracer6 For every "oldie" *cough* veteran four time stanley cup winners *cough* on a line, we have two young beastly players covering for him. I doubt your young, shattered, and non-intact core will be able to supress the tidal wave of Datsyuk/Zetterberg anymore than they could 2008-2010, especially now that the "oldie" and Stanley Cup-less/ Red Wings wipping boy Marty Turco is your goaly. Good luck making 7th place in the standings.
@jmanstar24 you mean all those veterans that got injured last year because they are too injury prone to play? The best part about having rookies is they have energy and they aren't as well scouted so they have an element of suprise. Well hey Hossa didn't have a cup until he played for us...So maybe Turco is next. Turco has sat on in the top 12 for quite a few years. Honestly when was the last time guys like Modano showed up in the top 30?
@Kartracer6 go check your facts, chicago bandwagoner. Nicklas Lidstrom, our oldest "injury prone" veteran, Played all 82 regular season games last year. And it's those same "injury prone" wings that won the cup in 08, and were 2 goals short of winning the cup in 09. Hossa came close to winning with us, and i no doubt believe a madono that plays with actual talent (unlike his past years with no talent Dallas) will boost his numbers. Good luck with your mistake prone rookies, and cup-less turco.
@jmanstar24 Ohh...one old player didn't get hurt and all the facts are screwed. LOL are you a moron seriously that had to be the worst defense yet...I'm seriously wondering when the last time Modano actually showed up for his hockey team. I mean at least Turco is in the top 12 every year for goal tending....Modano can't even make the top 30 now that he's past his prime. Yes our mistake of gathering rookies won us a cup..best mistake we ever made.
@Kartracer6 actually NONE of our veterans were injured last season. Everyone of our "injury prone" veterans except for Tomas Holmstrom (Played 68 games) played at least 78 games. Calling me a moron does not improve your mature status in my eyes either. In regaurds to Modano, he has contributed at least 20 every year in the last decade except for three years (the last two being the last two years, where Dallas has declined and Modano forgotten.) Turco, good? Yes. Against the Wings? Nope.
@Kartracer6 To add on, Turco is responsible himself for the net. there is no "he's a product of great defense". We'll see what the wings do to him when they get past Chicago's good defense (the only thing that has remained cleanly intact -Sopel i believe)
@Kartracer6 Can't respond? Obviously and Factually you can't fight off the Red Wings. It's apparent that you think i'm incoherent because i've countered every argument against the wings you have. Chicago can't handle the red wings and merely benefited from a rash of injuries we had among our prime players. Thanks in part to our healthy veterans (and young rookies and players), we kept ourselves in the playoff race.
@Kartracer6 Really? The "intellectual" argument that the red wings are too old (true but doesn't mean anything) have been countered, thus apparently i must be incoherent and out of my mind because countering those arguments are impossible among chicago fans. The truth? It was our veterans first, trade arrivals and rookie goalie that kept us in the playoff hunt. Once our team was assembled and healthy, we were the best team in the NHL before the playoffs.
@jmanstar24 Oh so what your saying is non of your veterans got injured, but it's your veterans that are going to kill the hawks...yet you claim there injury (that you earlier claimed never happened) is what helped us? Hawks where the best team in the NHL last year. Best odds to take the cup and best team in the West. Besides if we split the series how does that make the red wings better???
@Kartracer6 you are putting words in my mouth. The injuries never occured in our veteran ranks, they occured in our line of players who were young or in their prime (which happens). The hawks being the best team last year was questionable, once again. Who knows what would have happened had the wings stayed healthy? They were the best team in the NHL when the were healthy. Splitting the series against the eventual stanley cup champs while riddled with injuries proves just how deadly we are.
@Kartracer6 Have you ever heard of too many men on the ice? The refs down in san jose and up in detroit for game 3 definitely looked like they wanted to play for the Sharks... We very well had a legitimate shot at sweeping the chum in san jose (not to mention we outscored them 17-15, always lost by one point, and destroyed them in our only win) in order to woop your behinds onto a third straight stanley cup finals appearance.
@jmanstar24 Wings lost the series 4-1 against the same team the hawks sweep. So if you couldn't even beat the team the hawks swept how did you expect to beat the hawks? Oh and don't give me the ref excuse because Hawks had to fight the same poor reffing in the semi's and finals yet instead of complaining and whinning about it the Hawks learned to win through bad reffing.
@Kartracer6 You lack the ability to even focus on what i said. The Red Wings lost every game vs The Sharks by ONE point. It wasn't an obvious victory in terms of a 2+ Victory. Next, We very well had a shot at sweeping the Sharks (depending on what happened in game one if it had gone into OT.) Whether you like it or not, NO TEAM should ever have to fight against blatantly obvious bad calls. And from what i've read, the bad calls went in YOUR favor vs VAN.
@Kartracer6 And (C. Take a look at the scoring difference between the Sharks/ Wings series this year and the Wings/ Hawks. all are losses vs the sharks were by one point where a controversial call (minus game 5, to my memory) put us down/ took the game from us. Our only win was by six goals. You never came close to that destruction of the sharks. Contrast that to the Wings/Hawks series. Your only win was in OT. Half of our wins were by 3+ goals. You were handled.
@jmanstar24 Please...Nashville they had a controversal call almost costing us the series because they put us down a man for 5 min at the end of a game in which we were losing. Sharks series the very first game not a single penalty was called against the sharks when they were for sure doing them and it never improved past them. The flyers...holy crap that had to be the most one sided series ever no doubt. Sadly the reason you don't hear many fans from chicago complain is because we don't have
@Kartracer6 The Boarding call against Hossa was legit. Nashville was begging for him to get suspended. And yes, i saw game one of the WCF. It looked fishy, but that's all i could see in that series in terms of bad calls. Flyers? Again, i looked it up, and it sounds like a lot of bad calls also went in your favor in. It also seems like bad calls went against the flyers and hawks in different games where the hawks got calls in their favor and the Flyers got calls in their favor.
@jmanstar24 this tin foil hat conspiracy and we don't sit and whine about reffing like wings fans instead we adjust our game plan and learn to play through it. As for playing us in the playoffs 3 of the 5 games ended in OT games don't come much closer then that. Other then game 4....which was deemed one of the worst reffing games in the playoffs that year by many sports analysts. So ya it was just as close you just shot your mouth off and got caught in a statement you shouldn't have made.
@Kartracer6 No i didn't. You seem to be very upity. I believe i made sure i mentioned that we won half (EX 2 games). I'm not an idiot to go out and blatantly say we destroyed in all four out of five games we played. And as far as game 4, i've read two articles, and the closest thing i came to "worst called game in playoffs game that year" was several questionable calls against one of the hawks.
@jmanstar24 Really not sure what fantasy articles you looked at but Hawks fought the same reffing the wings did. It was bad. we never got a call our way in the Finals and it seemed like the refs wanted to hand the game to the flyers...I don't buy that was their goal it just felt like it. Well instead of our team bitching and crying about it we fought thru and won. Oh and game 4...yes there are a few articles about the complaints from the wings getting a large number of calls
@Kartracer6 Your coherence is starting to fall off the pace now. And i have no idea what fantasy you are living in, but that's what i have read. It went equal ways in the finals (i read comments on an article from NBC). I have yet to find anything on google that says anything about bad calls in game 4.
@jmanstar24 I laugh at any Idiot Flyers fan who actually thought they had bad reffing that series. And I've e-mailed you 2 sites. One addressing reffing in the flyers series and one addressing reffing in the wings game 4.
@Kartracer6 lol One cup really goes to your head? Chicago is a bad team. There are many shitty teams in the NHL. Get over it. Probability is the bigger reason they won in 2010. Not to mention sucking for so many years and getting high draft picks.
@gregchips2390 actually Chicago fans have done much better then fans like the wings and pens when it comes to winning the cup. You hear very little about it from hawk fans. Chicago is a very good team they probably have one of the most talented teams in the NHL and will probably be a dominating threat for years to come. Oh and if I can recall when was the last time Hawks had a great draft pick because of their season performance. Hawks really haven't sucked for years check your facts
@Kartracer6 Dominating threat for years? lol good one. They've played the most games in the West and can't even break top five. You lose...almost as much as the Hawks do. Seriously though enjoy that win last year, it won't happened often (or at all) with Chicago.
@gregchips2390 well gee they've been forced to play more games then any other team in the NHL after playing longer then nearly every team last year then not getting the summer off to relax because of all the cup presentations. Don't you think they might be a little winded? LOL Hawks have never been known to start off the year hot. Last year the year before that. They tend to get hot come playoff time. They have the most talented team in the NHL it's only 1/4 of the way through and they are
@gregchips2390 only down by 2 points from 1st place. LOL the standings are way to tight to be determining their place. The fact they are a threat for the playoffs and the teams they have been beating are playoff worthy teams, seems to me that's a good sign to come. They are a huge threat for years to come.
@gregchips2390 one cup...so far. LOL Delusional my ass I'm just speaking the same comments tons of sports analyst spoke. 26 points. 2 less then the Western conference leaders so what's your point?
@gregchips2390 Ya 28 points minus 26 points is 2 points less. At the time of the comment the Hawks where 2 points short of 1st place. It's still a young season and the standings are extremely tight right now. 2 points short of 1st isn't a bad place to be when you just got out of winning a cup and your still winded and just recently got your whole team back. they are at about 65 percent for ratio since the team has recollected. And they are missing just 5 points. Wait till the season ends
@gregchips2390 so 28 minus 26 isn't 2 points? So your saying it's something else? Well it's obvious your education level is to low to have a constructive conversation with.
@gregchips2390 LOL ok mister 28 minus 26 doesn't equal 2. LOL wow your dumb. Oh and you realize the Hawks points ratio since their whole team has been able to get back is around 70 percent. That's really not that bad for a team that's been forced to play more games then any other team and didn't get a break this summer like teams like Washington and Detroit.
@Kartracer6 lol ok idiot lemme break dis down. Ratios are pairs of numbers and they are used to make comparisons using fractions. We're not talking subtraction genius we're talkin' ratios. Now, you're parents did a good job in raising you (fo sho) yet you still seem to lack basic life skills. It's like dis son, you take( wins/games played) and get cho self a total win ratio. lose da seb-tra-shi-ohn it's only feeding your delusion bro. Break out da MSCal real quick and get a reality check.
@gregchips2390 you stated "Google "ratios" or learn basic math." Or as in their was something else in the statement other then ratio's well the only other thing mentioned was a simple subtraction method. No you don't compare by wins/games played. That's an unfair statistic because some teams have played less games so their percentage will be higher then what it will be if they loss games on their way to tying games played. You do it by points percentage. Total points/ Total points possible
@gregchips2390 Possible points. there was 8 games so a total of 16 points. of those 16 points they gained 11. (10 points for wins) (1 point for OT loss) 11/16 68.75% Rounded up it's 69%. But you keep making fun of my math skills it's just making you look more and more like an idiot. It's points ratio not games to wins. If done that way you lose the value of OT points.
@gregchips2390 LOL that's weak. No rounding with ratio's. Your a moron. Fine it's 68.75% oh you made such a difference on that LOL raped. How is a forth of a percent being raped? You are seriously an idiot. Your the one that was 6.25% off and you wanna whine about me adding a forth of a percent?
@Kartracer6 5/8 is 62.5%... might wanna brush up on yo readin' skillz as well as basic math. lol S'all good doh meng we need someone to drive dem buses and moe dem lawns.
@gregchips2390 LOL seriously? You stated my numbers where wrong and you did the wrong equation? Then you proceed to tell me I need reading skills. A BA in Accounting, Associates in Sports management and Emergency medicine, and a certification in coaching hockey and you want to talk crap to me. Believe me I'm not threatened by someone who can't master the simple concept of spelling let alone math and reading. You've seriously made me lose faith in public educational system with your comments
@gregchips2390 I feel sorry for you. The context of your spelling and the lack of intellegence seen in your comments just shows me the education you have. LOL did you get one of those Detroit educations I've heard so much about? Sure would explain a lot. I'll head back to my 6 figure income carreer you probably need to pack your lunch for school tomorrow. Is 6th grade fun the 3rd time around?
@gregchips2390 coming from the guy who can't do simple math. LOL I take it you wanna be a bus driver. You talk so much about it. Did you want to be like your bus driver on the short bus you ride to school? it's that not "dat" and yourself not "yo self" what are you? Some kind of primitave monkey who escaped the zoo? Typically I don't have a problem with the way people type or misspell words because it happens. But my god, are you even trying?
@gregchips2390 Are you seriously this unintellegent? I've yet to be wrong on my math or ratio's. However, it seems you didn't even know how the ratio's were done in hockey. LOL, and after you shot off your mouth about knowing them. It's not done with wins/games played it's done by points/points possible. Even then it's not fair to use either ratio because with the teams uneven in games played it's more benificial for teams who have played less games.
@gregchips2390 That had to be the most incoherent sentence I've ever read. That's just horrible. Your credibility really goes down the tube when you can't even construct proper sentences. Like I said what math problem was I wrong with?
@gregchips2390@gregchips2390 11/16 = 68.75% that is correct you moron. Seriously nobody can be as stupid as your pretending to be. We are done here because you obviously don't have the brain capacity to keep up with a simple conversation. I seriously can't say I've ever met anyone as stupid as you. Seriously do the world a favor and don't reproduce. Hell just remove yourself from society it would probably be easier. you Dumb shit
@gregchips2390 Yes chicago had a slow start. But history will show you they started their season like this last year and look where they stood then. They had a lot of problems with not having their team together for the longest time. with a full team they are 5-2-1 which means they are 69 percent points ratio with a full team. You realize they have 28 points this time last year they had 34 points (ok 6 points different) and in 2009 they had 26 points. 2 less then now. it's still early
@jmanstar24 Your first win against the hawks we had injuries and a lucky bounce won you the game. The Jan 17 hawks win you had you key guys back and we beat you. Mar. 7th you won by one in a controversial goalie interference call against the hawks. And your final season win was an OT thriller that could have bounced either way. 3-3 tie in the series between us just makes it a good rivalry not you guys "handling" us. Please your so delirious.
@Kartracer6 i did not reference the 2009-10 regular season series to the Handling. This is a strawman argument. And you fail to take into account how the loss of Madden and the five crew that got shipped off to the EC will affect your team next year in this "rivalry".
@jmanstar24 We also gained recruits and still had a pool of talent after we released those guys. To be honest at best Chicago's talent probably went equal with Detroits if not slightly better. Detroit is to high up on gaining Modano that they don't realize he's not as good as he used to be. He's not in his prime anymore. Just the fact guys like Madden are a threat in your eyes tells you how good a team we had because he is more of an AHL'er then an NHL guy and he still dominates.
@Kartracer6 I didn't know talent= the younger you are. My eyes must be deceiving me when i see Nicklas Lidstrom as a top four defenseman even in his 40s. We aren't totally high on modano. Actually, we've been high on all our recruits (two) as well as the big changes happening in our lineup.
Now, about Madden, Numbers lie. people can contribute even if their numbers don't say so, and it appeared that Madden did. You also have to factor in that Madden was one of the rare veterans on that team.
@Kartracer6 Have you ever heard of too many men on the ice? The refs down in san jose and up in detroit for game 3 definitely looked like they wanted to play for the Sharks... We very well had a legitimate shot at sweeping the chum in san jose (not to mention we outscored them 17-15, always lost by one point, and destroyed them in our only win) in order to woop your behinds into a third straight stanley cup finals appearance.
@Kartracer6 Why do i think DET would have beaten CHI? Two reasons A). When they were healthy, they took three games of the regular season series. B). we destroyed you 4-1 in the 09 WCF, Chicago having the same team -Kopecky, Madden, and Hossa
A) we had just as bad reffing all 4 series as you guys did against the sharks B) whats your point we took 3 wins when we were healthy. C. funny that when you beat us 4-1 it's destroyed but when you lose to the sharks 4-1 it's a close "almost" sweep. Face it Hawks were the dominate team during the playoffs and the majority of the season. Wings fans just wanted their glory days back and couldn't handle the facts they sit in the Hawks shadow all last season and playoffs.
@Kartracer6 A). Every time i looked up "Hawks INSERT PLAYOFF OPPONENT TEAM HERE 2010" I seem to find that the other side is the one complaining about bad calls or suggests they could have complained about bad reffing, NOT THE HAWKS. I seriously doubt this "bad reffing against the Hawks" has little to no credibility at all, unless you can present any evidence suggesting such an event. (B. You took three games from us while we were at a disadvantage of players.
@Kartracer6 truth be told, Chicago merely benefited from this rare injury outbreak. All your team full of "rookies" (which is also incorrect, most of the blackhawks were comprised of young players who were past their rookie years and veterans such as John Madden and Marian Hossa) could muster was a split with us in the regular season (we took the last game at the madison madhouse to emphasize the split.)
the red wings dont suck, never have, never will. if anything, the hawks are going to suck against the wings next season, btw: the wings have been predicted to win the division, so, i guess i can say the hawks will suck since u fags were saying that to us all year long.
@nintendoman34 where on earth is it stated the wings are predicted to win the conference?? Last ranking I read had Chicago sitting 3rd best to win the cup...wings were down in 11th
most NHL standings predictions have put the wings ahead of the hawks. btw: i said division, not conference dumbass. and where the hell did u get that inaccurate reading from? and the wings have a far better chance at winning the cup than the hawks do, wow.
@nintendoman34 ok I sent you my list of links....I'm not denying your claim but I sent multiple links all showing Chicago over Detroit. I can't seem to find any with Detroit on top...I even tried so if you have any non-bais links showing Detroit taking the conference e-mail me.
@Kartracer6 i sent u my list of links as well, these links show detroit ahead of chicago. i found plenty with detroit on top, as well as finding some with chicago on top. i can assure u that none of these are bias, as i hope that urs aren't either. i'l check urs out, check out my links. well, i didnt e-mail u, i just sent u a personal message for the links.
i typed on google search, i typed in 2010-2011 nhl standings predictions, i found most of those that way, i hope u know that i gave u the links for these pages right? did u type in what i even gave u? u do know that i gave u standings predictions instead of stanley cup predictions right? im confused
@nintendoman34 ya I saw them...I noticed the seemed to put Chicago right under Detroit. Sounds to me like we may have a close battle for division this year. I don't imagine it turning out like last year where Chicago pretty much destroyed their division. This year I can see it being close to 2-3 points going either Detroit or Chicago's way. I did send you a link with Division predictions also I just sent the odds chart so we could have an overall view from sports analysts.
ok, good. i saw everything. lets wait and see in the real hockey season, and the six match-ups. oh, and saying chicago destroyed the division last year is a false analysis. after all detroit went through last year, with injuries to starters, and key players, many would consider that a down year, while they still finished with 102 points. ( only two behind from what u guys got in '09 ). just like u guys would argue if i said that the wings destroyed the division in '09.
@Chitown2701 - haha who did the Canadiens beat in order to play the Flyers? hmmm pretty fucking sure it was the Pens, So if the Canadiens owned the Pens and then got theyre asses kicked by the Flyers that pretty much means your fucking retarded, try again faget.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
i dont think the hawks will do well this season they definately need to aquire a true #1 goalie after lossing nikolai khabibulin. cristobal huet will lead them no where in the playoffs
I remember this game like it was yesterday. We needed this win. No excuse going up 3-0 and then in what, 1:23 or something absurd letting Detroit tie it up at three.
Sharpie's my favorite Blackhawk. It was a thrill seeing him get this goal, and gave us Hawks fans renewed hope in the series.
Ahhhh ENJOY THE GOLF!!!! and just keep watching this over and over, the ONLY win you mustered in the Conference Championship. Umm, We put up 6 goals and you pulled your goalie. THAT my freind is an OWNING!!!! Wrigley is OURS now!!! Muahahahaha! GO WINGS!!!!
Gotta hand it to them after blowing the lead to finish us off...for the moment. A fine series with 3 fantastic finishes but we're SO DEEP! I have a feeling we'll be seeing you guys in the post season again several times in the next 10 or so years.
As you saw in Game 4. It WAS luck! Muahahaa!!! GO RED WINGS!!!!! We OWNED you! So just keep replaying this video. It's as good as it's gonna get for ya Slackhawks!
Hey people of the interweb my name is travis i'm 19 and on the heart transplant list, so i thought it would be a good idea to buy a HD camera and start a HT video diary, check it out tell me what you think.
i would love to see a pens vs hawks stanley cup final. go kick detroits ass blackhawks. we hate those pricks just as much, if not more, than you guys do.
Ya, I'm a bigger fan of hockey than basketball but you are delusional or not all there in the head if you think that goal was more majestic than the end to the Cavs/Magic game.
Ya;'ll got LUCKY that is all that win was. LUCK. No skill involved. It takes skill to come back from 3-0 without one of our most productive players (Datsyuk) and a BS ejection. Soak it up while you can Slackhawk fans. It'll be over for you soon. LET'S GO RED WINGS!!!!
dude for real...i didnt even realize that pahlsson did that until i got home and watched the repaly on youtube...fucking amazing, pahlsson had a great game on fri
I hope we beat out these disgrace to hockey red wings. They started the series playing good hockey then started losing and started playing their typical hurt players to win type of hockey. Why can't they just win a game like real teams do not have to play cheap shit
What? As an unbiased observer I have thought both teams have played pretty fair. Maybe you are upset that your team is probably going to lose to a much better Red Wings team?
Your talking about that hit during the first period, correct? I didn't think that was a bad hit. The guy put his head down when he had the puck, that's asking for it in hockey...
I'm talking Kornwalls cheap shot on Havlat the interference major which got him ejected then Staurt tried another cheap shot in Game 4 they injured Kane during the regular season then tried to reinjure him in the winter classic and also tried to injure our goalie in the classic. It's a joke
Yeah... A lot of people (including me) don't think that was a cheap shot. He didn't leave his feet until after making contact or lead with his elbow. Kornwall(?) has a history of leaving his feet though, so I can see why people thought that it was a cheapshot. In the NHL the players need to have their head on a swival...
interference was called because he didn't have possesion of the puck. But yet you say he had possesion. hmm funny how that works. hey what ever gets you cups right....lol Detroit's gotta be good at at least 1 sport LOL they might just fall off the map if they aren't.
If you call those hits a cheap shot Kartracer6 then you are not a fan of hockey. Those hits were as clean as Bill Cosby's stand-up comedy. Just cause it happened to your lil boy band of slackhawks doesn't take away the fact that they were clean. If it happened to a Wing I'd say, "Damn, nice hit, BS call." GO RED WINGS!!!!!
You moron 6-4 is hardly smoked. LOL proves Detroit couldn't beat us with out injuring players...pretty pathetic i know. I love it. I guess when a team realizes they have so much weight on his shoulders they throw out their classiness and respect to get a win anyway they can.
The Real Pride Of Thunderbay
BronzebackJack 3 months ago
@BronzebackJack That would be the Staal Bros.
CamericaUSA 3 months ago
DE-TROIT SUCKS!!! DE-TROIT SUCKS!!!
bhawksaddict 4 months ago
:55 haha what was that?
osianozzy 4 months ago
DETROIT SUCKS! DETROIT SUCKS! DETROIT SUCKS!
AWOwns 5 months ago
at a boy sharpie detroit suks GO HAWKS !!!!!
CBbaseballboys1 7 months ago
one of the worst goal songs ever. Sorry but true
CoreyPerrySucks 9 months ago
@CoreyPerrySucks shows how much you know about hockey by having a name that is corey Perry Sucks when he is easily one of the best forwards in the game..... Chelsea dagger and the Ranger's goal song ar ethe two BEST goal songs in the NHL and that is widely known and accepted.
witesnypr 9 months ago
@witesnypr- I just dont like him, he is one of the biggest goons ever, cheap shot artist as well
CoreyPerrySucks 9 months ago
@witesnypr Well said, no doubt the Rangers and Blackhawks goal songs are the best in the NHL.
LordStanley1994 8 months ago
@LordStanley1994
I agree. You know you have a good goal song when the fans of the other 29 teams can't stand it. It's seriously annoying as fuck.
That song plays in the nightmares of Vancouver players.
redwingsmike3718 7 months ago
@redwingsmike3718 Well actually I'm a Rangers fan, and I don't mind CD really, because when I heard it last year in the SCF games played in Chicago, it meant the Hawks had scored on the Flyers. And yeah, CD is probably the most hated song of both the Canucks players and their fans.
LordStanley1994 7 months ago
@LordStanley1994 you got that right just look up canucks rattled by chelsea dagger
TheFishtank5 6 months ago
No, you didn't have a series again....
redwings191420 1 year ago
SHARPIE ROX HE IS NOW A STANLEY CUP CHAMPION !!!!!!!!!!!!!! RED WINGS SUCK
scahillchicago 1 year ago
@scahillchicago that's right... Just get it all absorbed in before next season when the Wings OWN TURCO AND ROOKIE CO.
jmanstar24 1 year ago
@jmanstar24 Not sure Detroit will have time to own the hawks next season...most of your guys will be to busy applying for social security. Hope none of those oldies have a heart attack before the season comes to a close
Kartracer6 1 year ago
@Kartracer6 For every "oldie" *cough* veteran four time stanley cup winners *cough* on a line, we have two young beastly players covering for him. I doubt your young, shattered, and non-intact core will be able to supress the tidal wave of Datsyuk/Zetterberg anymore than they could 2008-2010, especially now that the "oldie" and Stanley Cup-less/ Red Wings wipping boy Marty Turco is your goaly. Good luck making 7th place in the standings.
jmanstar24 1 year ago
@jmanstar24 you mean all those veterans that got injured last year because they are too injury prone to play? The best part about having rookies is they have energy and they aren't as well scouted so they have an element of suprise. Well hey Hossa didn't have a cup until he played for us...So maybe Turco is next. Turco has sat on in the top 12 for quite a few years. Honestly when was the last time guys like Modano showed up in the top 30?
Kartracer6 1 year ago
@Kartracer6 go check your facts, chicago bandwagoner. Nicklas Lidstrom, our oldest "injury prone" veteran, Played all 82 regular season games last year. And it's those same "injury prone" wings that won the cup in 08, and were 2 goals short of winning the cup in 09. Hossa came close to winning with us, and i no doubt believe a madono that plays with actual talent (unlike his past years with no talent Dallas) will boost his numbers. Good luck with your mistake prone rookies, and cup-less turco.
jmanstar24 1 year ago
@jmanstar24 Ohh...one old player didn't get hurt and all the facts are screwed. LOL are you a moron seriously that had to be the worst defense yet...I'm seriously wondering when the last time Modano actually showed up for his hockey team. I mean at least Turco is in the top 12 every year for goal tending....Modano can't even make the top 30 now that he's past his prime. Yes our mistake of gathering rookies won us a cup..best mistake we ever made.
Kartracer6 1 year ago
@Kartracer6 actually NONE of our veterans were injured last season. Everyone of our "injury prone" veterans except for Tomas Holmstrom (Played 68 games) played at least 78 games. Calling me a moron does not improve your mature status in my eyes either. In regaurds to Modano, he has contributed at least 20 every year in the last decade except for three years (the last two being the last two years, where Dallas has declined and Modano forgotten.) Turco, good? Yes. Against the Wings? Nope.
jmanstar24 1 year ago
@Kartracer6 apparently Turco can show up for the stars why can't Modano??
Kartracer6 1 year ago
@Kartracer6 To add on, Turco is responsible himself for the net. there is no "he's a product of great defense". We'll see what the wings do to him when they get past Chicago's good defense (the only thing that has remained cleanly intact -Sopel i believe)
jmanstar24 1 year ago
@jmanstar24 now your just simply rambling incoharently
Kartracer6 1 year ago
@Kartracer6 Can't respond? Obviously and Factually you can't fight off the Red Wings. It's apparent that you think i'm incoherent because i've countered every argument against the wings you have. Chicago can't handle the red wings and merely benefited from a rash of injuries we had among our prime players. Thanks in part to our healthy veterans (and young rookies and players), we kept ourselves in the playoff race.
jmanstar24 1 year ago
@Kartracer6 Really? The "intellectual" argument that the red wings are too old (true but doesn't mean anything) have been countered, thus apparently i must be incoherent and out of my mind because countering those arguments are impossible among chicago fans. The truth? It was our veterans first, trade arrivals and rookie goalie that kept us in the playoff hunt. Once our team was assembled and healthy, we were the best team in the NHL before the playoffs.
jmanstar24 1 year ago
@jmanstar24 Oh so what your saying is non of your veterans got injured, but it's your veterans that are going to kill the hawks...yet you claim there injury (that you earlier claimed never happened) is what helped us? Hawks where the best team in the NHL last year. Best odds to take the cup and best team in the West. Besides if we split the series how does that make the red wings better???
Kartracer6 1 year ago
@Kartracer6 you are putting words in my mouth. The injuries never occured in our veteran ranks, they occured in our line of players who were young or in their prime (which happens). The hawks being the best team last year was questionable, once again. Who knows what would have happened had the wings stayed healthy? They were the best team in the NHL when the were healthy. Splitting the series against the eventual stanley cup champs while riddled with injuries proves just how deadly we are.
jmanstar24 1 year ago
@jmanstar24 they were healthy in the playoffs and they didn't even make it past round 2. So I wouldn't call that best team in the NHL
Kartracer6 1 year ago
@Kartracer6 Have you ever heard of too many men on the ice? The refs down in san jose and up in detroit for game 3 definitely looked like they wanted to play for the Sharks... We very well had a legitimate shot at sweeping the chum in san jose (not to mention we outscored them 17-15, always lost by one point, and destroyed them in our only win) in order to woop your behinds onto a third straight stanley cup finals appearance.
jmanstar24 1 year ago
@jmanstar24 Wings lost the series 4-1 against the same team the hawks sweep. So if you couldn't even beat the team the hawks swept how did you expect to beat the hawks? Oh and don't give me the ref excuse because Hawks had to fight the same poor reffing in the semi's and finals yet instead of complaining and whinning about it the Hawks learned to win through bad reffing.
Kartracer6 1 year ago
@Kartracer6 You lack the ability to even focus on what i said. The Red Wings lost every game vs The Sharks by ONE point. It wasn't an obvious victory in terms of a 2+ Victory. Next, We very well had a shot at sweeping the Sharks (depending on what happened in game one if it had gone into OT.) Whether you like it or not, NO TEAM should ever have to fight against blatantly obvious bad calls. And from what i've read, the bad calls went in YOUR favor vs VAN.
jmanstar24 1 year ago
@Kartracer6 And (C. Take a look at the scoring difference between the Sharks/ Wings series this year and the Wings/ Hawks. all are losses vs the sharks were by one point where a controversial call (minus game 5, to my memory) put us down/ took the game from us. Our only win was by six goals. You never came close to that destruction of the sharks. Contrast that to the Wings/Hawks series. Your only win was in OT. Half of our wins were by 3+ goals. You were handled.
jmanstar24 1 year ago
@jmanstar24 Please...Nashville they had a controversal call almost costing us the series because they put us down a man for 5 min at the end of a game in which we were losing. Sharks series the very first game not a single penalty was called against the sharks when they were for sure doing them and it never improved past them. The flyers...holy crap that had to be the most one sided series ever no doubt. Sadly the reason you don't hear many fans from chicago complain is because we don't have
Kartracer6 1 year ago
@Kartracer6 The Boarding call against Hossa was legit. Nashville was begging for him to get suspended. And yes, i saw game one of the WCF. It looked fishy, but that's all i could see in that series in terms of bad calls. Flyers? Again, i looked it up, and it sounds like a lot of bad calls also went in your favor in. It also seems like bad calls went against the flyers and hawks in different games where the hawks got calls in their favor and the Flyers got calls in their favor.
jmanstar24 1 year ago
@jmanstar24 this tin foil hat conspiracy and we don't sit and whine about reffing like wings fans instead we adjust our game plan and learn to play through it. As for playing us in the playoffs 3 of the 5 games ended in OT games don't come much closer then that. Other then game 4....which was deemed one of the worst reffing games in the playoffs that year by many sports analysts. So ya it was just as close you just shot your mouth off and got caught in a statement you shouldn't have made.
Kartracer6 1 year ago
@Kartracer6 No i didn't. You seem to be very upity. I believe i made sure i mentioned that we won half (EX 2 games). I'm not an idiot to go out and blatantly say we destroyed in all four out of five games we played. And as far as game 4, i've read two articles, and the closest thing i came to "worst called game in playoffs game that year" was several questionable calls against one of the hawks.
jmanstar24 1 year ago
@jmanstar24 Really not sure what fantasy articles you looked at but Hawks fought the same reffing the wings did. It was bad. we never got a call our way in the Finals and it seemed like the refs wanted to hand the game to the flyers...I don't buy that was their goal it just felt like it. Well instead of our team bitching and crying about it we fought thru and won. Oh and game 4...yes there are a few articles about the complaints from the wings getting a large number of calls
Kartracer6 1 year ago
@Kartracer6 Your coherence is starting to fall off the pace now. And i have no idea what fantasy you are living in, but that's what i have read. It went equal ways in the finals (i read comments on an article from NBC). I have yet to find anything on google that says anything about bad calls in game 4.
jmanstar24 1 year ago
@jmanstar24 I laugh at any Idiot Flyers fan who actually thought they had bad reffing that series. And I've e-mailed you 2 sites. One addressing reffing in the flyers series and one addressing reffing in the wings game 4.
Kartracer6 1 year ago
@Kartracer6 lol One cup really goes to your head? Chicago is a bad team. There are many shitty teams in the NHL. Get over it. Probability is the bigger reason they won in 2010. Not to mention sucking for so many years and getting high draft picks.
gregchips2390 1 year ago
@gregchips2390 actually Chicago fans have done much better then fans like the wings and pens when it comes to winning the cup. You hear very little about it from hawk fans. Chicago is a very good team they probably have one of the most talented teams in the NHL and will probably be a dominating threat for years to come. Oh and if I can recall when was the last time Hawks had a great draft pick because of their season performance. Hawks really haven't sucked for years check your facts
Kartracer6 1 year ago
@Kartracer6 Dominating threat for years? lol good one. They've played the most games in the West and can't even break top five. You lose...almost as much as the Hawks do. Seriously though enjoy that win last year, it won't happened often (or at all) with Chicago.
gregchips2390 1 year ago
@gregchips2390 well gee they've been forced to play more games then any other team in the NHL after playing longer then nearly every team last year then not getting the summer off to relax because of all the cup presentations. Don't you think they might be a little winded? LOL Hawks have never been known to start off the year hot. Last year the year before that. They tend to get hot come playoff time. They have the most talented team in the NHL it's only 1/4 of the way through and they are
Kartracer6 1 year ago
@gregchips2390 only down by 2 points from 1st place. LOL the standings are way to tight to be determining their place. The fact they are a threat for the playoffs and the teams they have been beating are playoff worthy teams, seems to me that's a good sign to come. They are a huge threat for years to come.
Kartracer6 1 year ago
@Kartracer6 lol you're pretty delusional. One cup...it's just one. twenty five games and twenty six points soo good.
gregchips2390 1 year ago
@gregchips2390 one cup...so far. LOL Delusional my ass I'm just speaking the same comments tons of sports analyst spoke. 26 points. 2 less then the Western conference leaders so what's your point?
Kartracer6 1 year ago
@Kartracer6 Aw man, ignorance is bliss I suppose. Google "ratios" or just learn basic math.
gregchips2390 1 year ago
@gregchips2390 Ya 28 points minus 26 points is 2 points less. At the time of the comment the Hawks where 2 points short of 1st place. It's still a young season and the standings are extremely tight right now. 2 points short of 1st isn't a bad place to be when you just got out of winning a cup and your still winded and just recently got your whole team back. they are at about 65 percent for ratio since the team has recollected. And they are missing just 5 points. Wait till the season ends
Kartracer6 1 year ago
@Kartracer6 lol moron. Google "ratios" or learn basic math.
gregchips2390 1 year ago
@gregchips2390 so 28 minus 26 isn't 2 points? So your saying it's something else? Well it's obvious your education level is to low to have a constructive conversation with.
Kartracer6 1 year ago
@Kartracer6 lol idiot, Google "ratios." It's simple math really but you sound very smart; your parents did a good job. lol
gregchips2390 1 year ago
@gregchips2390 LOL ok mister 28 minus 26 doesn't equal 2. LOL wow your dumb. Oh and you realize the Hawks points ratio since their whole team has been able to get back is around 70 percent. That's really not that bad for a team that's been forced to play more games then any other team and didn't get a break this summer like teams like Washington and Detroit.
Kartracer6 1 year ago
@Kartracer6 lol ok idiot lemme break dis down. Ratios are pairs of numbers and they are used to make comparisons using fractions. We're not talking subtraction genius we're talkin' ratios. Now, you're parents did a good job in raising you (fo sho) yet you still seem to lack basic life skills. It's like dis son, you take( wins/games played) and get cho self a total win ratio. lose da seb-tra-shi-ohn it's only feeding your delusion bro. Break out da MSCal real quick and get a reality check.
gregchips2390 1 year ago
@gregchips2390 you stated "Google "ratios" or learn basic math." Or as in their was something else in the statement other then ratio's well the only other thing mentioned was a simple subtraction method. No you don't compare by wins/games played. That's an unfair statistic because some teams have played less games so their percentage will be higher then what it will be if they loss games on their way to tying games played. You do it by points percentage. Total points/ Total points possible
Kartracer6 1 year ago
@Kartracer6 lol idiot, ratios are the only way to make it perfectly even. And 5/8=62.5% not 69% lmao you're so bad at math. Life skillz bro get dem.
gregchips2390 1 year ago
@gregchips2390 Possible points. there was 8 games so a total of 16 points. of those 16 points they gained 11. (10 points for wins) (1 point for OT loss) 11/16 68.75% Rounded up it's 69%. But you keep making fun of my math skills it's just making you look more and more like an idiot. It's points ratio not games to wins. If done that way you lose the value of OT points.
Kartracer6 1 year ago
@Kartracer6 There is no rounding with ratios. lol you lose. Aw man, why do you keep coming back to get raped?
gregchips2390 1 year ago
@gregchips2390 LOL that's weak. No rounding with ratio's. Your a moron. Fine it's 68.75% oh you made such a difference on that LOL raped. How is a forth of a percent being raped? You are seriously an idiot. Your the one that was 6.25% off and you wanna whine about me adding a forth of a percent?
Kartracer6 1 year ago
@Kartracer6 5/8 is 62.5%... might wanna brush up on yo readin' skillz as well as basic math. lol S'all good doh meng we need someone to drive dem buses and moe dem lawns.
gregchips2390 1 year ago
@gregchips2390 LOL seriously? You stated my numbers where wrong and you did the wrong equation? Then you proceed to tell me I need reading skills. A BA in Accounting, Associates in Sports management and Emergency medicine, and a certification in coaching hockey and you want to talk crap to me. Believe me I'm not threatened by someone who can't master the simple concept of spelling let alone math and reading. You've seriously made me lose faith in public educational system with your comments
Kartracer6 1 year ago
@Kartracer6 I see your delusions go far beyon a shitty hockey team. lol Drive dat bus bro. gg
gregchips2390 1 year ago
@gregchips2390 I feel sorry for you. The context of your spelling and the lack of intellegence seen in your comments just shows me the education you have. LOL did you get one of those Detroit educations I've heard so much about? Sure would explain a lot. I'll head back to my 6 figure income carreer you probably need to pack your lunch for school tomorrow. Is 6th grade fun the 3rd time around?
Kartracer6 1 year ago
@Kartracer6 I guess you need a pretty avid imagination to keep yo self occupied while drivin' dat bus?
gregchips2390 1 year ago
@gregchips2390 coming from the guy who can't do simple math. LOL I take it you wanna be a bus driver. You talk so much about it. Did you want to be like your bus driver on the short bus you ride to school? it's that not "dat" and yourself not "yo self" what are you? Some kind of primitave monkey who escaped the zoo? Typically I don't have a problem with the way people type or misspell words because it happens. But my god, are you even trying?
Kartracer6 1 year ago
@Kartracer6 BA in Accounting? Yet chew don't know basic maths or dem ratios. Wolfram bro, Wolfram fo relz.
gregchips2390 1 year ago
@gregchips2390 Are you seriously this unintellegent? I've yet to be wrong on my math or ratio's. However, it seems you didn't even know how the ratio's were done in hockey. LOL, and after you shot off your mouth about knowing them. It's not done with wins/games played it's done by points/points possible. Even then it's not fair to use either ratio because with the teams uneven in games played it's more benificial for teams who have played less games.
Kartracer6 1 year ago
@Kartracer6 Aw man, your maths are so bad. Ratios are da accuratest, so much beder than subtraction.
gregchips2390 1 year ago
@gregchips2390 That had to be the most incoherent sentence I've ever read. That's just horrible. Your credibility really goes down the tube when you can't even construct proper sentences. Like I said what math problem was I wrong with?
Kartracer6 1 year ago
@Kartracer6 Da ratios bro.
gregchips2390 1 year ago
@gregchips2390 @gregchips2390 11/16 = 68.75% that is correct you moron. Seriously nobody can be as stupid as your pretending to be. We are done here because you obviously don't have the brain capacity to keep up with a simple conversation. I seriously can't say I've ever met anyone as stupid as you. Seriously do the world a favor and don't reproduce. Hell just remove yourself from society it would probably be easier. you Dumb shit
Kartracer6 1 year ago
@Kartracer6 Ratio win.
gregchips2390 1 year ago
@Kartracer6 I forgot to add, (points/possible points) is the same thing as (wins/total games). LOL gg moron, your parents win.
gregchips2390 1 year ago
@gregchips2390 Yes chicago had a slow start. But history will show you they started their season like this last year and look where they stood then. They had a lot of problems with not having their team together for the longest time. with a full team they are 5-2-1 which means they are 69 percent points ratio with a full team. You realize they have 28 points this time last year they had 34 points (ok 6 points different) and in 2009 they had 26 points. 2 less then now. it's still early
Kartracer6 1 year ago
@jmanstar24 Your first win against the hawks we had injuries and a lucky bounce won you the game. The Jan 17 hawks win you had you key guys back and we beat you. Mar. 7th you won by one in a controversial goalie interference call against the hawks. And your final season win was an OT thriller that could have bounced either way. 3-3 tie in the series between us just makes it a good rivalry not you guys "handling" us. Please your so delirious.
Kartracer6 1 year ago
@Kartracer6 i did not reference the 2009-10 regular season series to the Handling. This is a strawman argument. And you fail to take into account how the loss of Madden and the five crew that got shipped off to the EC will affect your team next year in this "rivalry".
jmanstar24 1 year ago
@jmanstar24 We also gained recruits and still had a pool of talent after we released those guys. To be honest at best Chicago's talent probably went equal with Detroits if not slightly better. Detroit is to high up on gaining Modano that they don't realize he's not as good as he used to be. He's not in his prime anymore. Just the fact guys like Madden are a threat in your eyes tells you how good a team we had because he is more of an AHL'er then an NHL guy and he still dominates.
Kartracer6 1 year ago
@Kartracer6 I didn't know talent= the younger you are. My eyes must be deceiving me when i see Nicklas Lidstrom as a top four defenseman even in his 40s. We aren't totally high on modano. Actually, we've been high on all our recruits (two) as well as the big changes happening in our lineup.
Now, about Madden, Numbers lie. people can contribute even if their numbers don't say so, and it appeared that Madden did. You also have to factor in that Madden was one of the rare veterans on that team.
jmanstar24 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Kartracer6 Have you ever heard of too many men on the ice? The refs down in san jose and up in detroit for game 3 definitely looked like they wanted to play for the Sharks... We very well had a legitimate shot at sweeping the chum in san jose (not to mention we outscored them 17-15, always lost by one point, and destroyed them in our only win) in order to woop your behinds into a third straight stanley cup finals appearance.
jmanstar24 1 year ago
@Kartracer6 Why do i think DET would have beaten CHI? Two reasons A). When they were healthy, they took three games of the regular season series. B). we destroyed you 4-1 in the 09 WCF, Chicago having the same team -Kopecky, Madden, and Hossa
jmanstar24 1 year ago
A) we had just as bad reffing all 4 series as you guys did against the sharks B) whats your point we took 3 wins when we were healthy. C. funny that when you beat us 4-1 it's destroyed but when you lose to the sharks 4-1 it's a close "almost" sweep. Face it Hawks were the dominate team during the playoffs and the majority of the season. Wings fans just wanted their glory days back and couldn't handle the facts they sit in the Hawks shadow all last season and playoffs.
Kartracer6 1 year ago
@Kartracer6 A). Every time i looked up "Hawks INSERT PLAYOFF OPPONENT TEAM HERE 2010" I seem to find that the other side is the one complaining about bad calls or suggests they could have complained about bad reffing, NOT THE HAWKS. I seriously doubt this "bad reffing against the Hawks" has little to no credibility at all, unless you can present any evidence suggesting such an event. (B. You took three games from us while we were at a disadvantage of players.
jmanstar24 1 year ago
@Kartracer6 truth be told, Chicago merely benefited from this rare injury outbreak. All your team full of "rookies" (which is also incorrect, most of the blackhawks were comprised of young players who were past their rookie years and veterans such as John Madden and Marian Hossa) could muster was a split with us in the regular season (we took the last game at the madison madhouse to emphasize the split.)
jmanstar24 1 year ago
@scahillchicago
the red wings dont suck, never have, never will. if anything, the hawks are going to suck against the wings next season, btw: the wings have been predicted to win the division, so, i guess i can say the hawks will suck since u fags were saying that to us all year long.
nintendoman34 1 year ago
@nintendoman34 where on earth is it stated the wings are predicted to win the conference?? Last ranking I read had Chicago sitting 3rd best to win the cup...wings were down in 11th
Kartracer6 1 year ago
@Kartracer6
most NHL standings predictions have put the wings ahead of the hawks. btw: i said division, not conference dumbass. and where the hell did u get that inaccurate reading from? and the wings have a far better chance at winning the cup than the hawks do, wow.
nintendoman34 1 year ago
@nintendoman34 ok I sent you my list of links....I'm not denying your claim but I sent multiple links all showing Chicago over Detroit. I can't seem to find any with Detroit on top...I even tried so if you have any non-bais links showing Detroit taking the conference e-mail me.
Kartracer6 1 year ago
@Kartracer6 i sent u my list of links as well, these links show detroit ahead of chicago. i found plenty with detroit on top, as well as finding some with chicago on top. i can assure u that none of these are bias, as i hope that urs aren't either. i'l check urs out, check out my links. well, i didnt e-mail u, i just sent u a personal message for the links.
nintendoman34 1 year ago
@nintendoman34 It's weird...I honestly could never find a single form with Detroit over Chicago...I even tried to. What did you search for?
Kartracer6 1 year ago
@Kartracer6
i typed on google search, i typed in 2010-2011 nhl standings predictions, i found most of those that way, i hope u know that i gave u the links for these pages right? did u type in what i even gave u? u do know that i gave u standings predictions instead of stanley cup predictions right? im confused
nintendoman34 1 year ago
@nintendoman34 ya I saw them...I noticed the seemed to put Chicago right under Detroit. Sounds to me like we may have a close battle for division this year. I don't imagine it turning out like last year where Chicago pretty much destroyed their division. This year I can see it being close to 2-3 points going either Detroit or Chicago's way. I did send you a link with Division predictions also I just sent the odds chart so we could have an overall view from sports analysts.
Kartracer6 1 year ago
@Kartracer6
ok, good. i saw everything. lets wait and see in the real hockey season, and the six match-ups. oh, and saying chicago destroyed the division last year is a false analysis. after all detroit went through last year, with injuries to starters, and key players, many would consider that a down year, while they still finished with 102 points. ( only two behind from what u guys got in '09 ). just like u guys would argue if i said that the wings destroyed the division in '09.
nintendoman34 1 year ago
blackhawks r just to good for the redwings
hockeychick1936 1 year ago
@hockeychick1936 - lmfao yeah right....maybe this year, but the prev. years? Red Wings fucking owned the Hawks, everyone owned the Hawks.
JxKx4x7 1 year ago
@JxKx4x7 And the Pens own the Flyers, you butthurt 17 year old fukin punk.
Chitown2701 1 year ago
@Chitown2701 - haha who did the Canadiens beat in order to play the Flyers? hmmm pretty fucking sure it was the Pens, So if the Canadiens owned the Pens and then got theyre asses kicked by the Flyers that pretty much means your fucking retarded, try again faget.
JxKx4x7 1 year ago
@JxKx4x7 Dude, the Flyers lost, just get over it.
Chitown2701 1 year ago
The classy, hard-working Wings taught the Hawks alot over the past few years, most imprtantly how to be STANLEY CUP CHAMPIONS!!!!
jayc70sox 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
chicago sucks balls
kavimander 1 year ago
@kavimander
lol umad
xandaman23 1 year ago
@kavimander lollololololol just cause your team got OWNED!!!!!!
GetHalo350s 1 year ago
the hawks are something i love them
Onemandynasty13 1 year ago
sha sha sha sharpie
soccaman847 2 years ago 2
Sharpieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
spriggs20 2 years ago 6
what a young talented team. I can see them as a stanley cup team this year!
anthonychrisbradley 2 years ago 4
@anthonychrisbradley they lost sucker
DesmondProductions 8 months ago
@DesmondProductions uh you do know i made that comment back in early 2010, before they won the cup. derp.
anthonychrisbradley 8 months ago
yeahhhhhhhhhhhhh PATRICK SHARP !!!!!!!!! its my idol!!!
choubakabra123 2 years ago
GO HAWKS!
TheQuester2 2 years ago 7
This is the best chance the hawks have at the cup. Soon the salary cap will get em. It's getting at Detroit now.
NebraskaFan77 2 years ago
why does chicago have to be so good at ending it early in OT ?
pritpaul97 2 years ago 14
@pritpaul97
they did it again!
xandaman23 1 year ago
@pritpaul97 i dont know but they did it again tonight!
milkandmeat 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Why can't this be my leafs ?
jayvardy 2 years ago
Jayvardy i will tell you why leafs suck hawks are way better
legendkyle3 2 years ago 2
the hawks are on the verge of taking the leap
psu68born 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i dont think the hawks will do well this season they definately need to aquire a true #1 goalie after lossing nikolai khabibulin. cristobal huet will lead them no where in the playoffs
downmags 2 years ago
habibullshit was sucing anyway huet is better
bigdantropphat 2 years ago
nice prediction lmao
MWTCC 2 years ago
GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!!!!
mtndewman14 2 years ago 9
GO BLACKHAWKS
tapsbetch 2 years ago 5
cant wait for the season, youtube can only do so much
cubbyblu10 2 years ago 3
I remember this game like it was yesterday. We needed this win. No excuse going up 3-0 and then in what, 1:23 or something absurd letting Detroit tie it up at three.
Sharpie's my favorite Blackhawk. It was a thrill seeing him get this goal, and gave us Hawks fans renewed hope in the series.
Hockey can't come soon enough!
AeroZach1029 2 years ago
lmao announcer fail thinkin bollie's ladd and then at the end of the vid laddie appears in the back lol GO HAWKS ITS ALL OURS THIS YEAR!!
bLaCkHaWkMaN0910 2 years ago 2
+1, MWTCC. Go Hawks.,
SotodrivesaGeo 2 years ago
all theses detroit people start stuff on here...yet i dont see any of them talking trash on any football videos lol..GO HAWKS!
MWTCC 2 years ago
blakchawks are better than redwings way better
2rubysoho 2 years ago 3
hahaha.
el3m3nt43 2 years ago
and younger. they'll win a cup within the next 5 years, no doubt
fearthehawksndcavs24 2 years ago 2
sharp is awesome!!!!!!!! THUNDER BAY!
wardzig1993 2 years ago
what a badass hometown name...THUNDER BAY. haha that just sounds intimidating
RockyTop1012 2 years ago
GO HAWKS! Can't wait til next season. Its going to be a hell of a season. Detroit (sucks) this is just the beginning!
slapshot254 2 years ago
thats pretty funny how some fans throw their jerseys on the ice as if they won the cup
mlc430 2 years ago
Ahhhh ENJOY THE GOLF!!!! and just keep watching this over and over, the ONLY win you mustered in the Conference Championship. Umm, We put up 6 goals and you pulled your goalie. THAT my freind is an OWNING!!!! Wrigley is OURS now!!! Muahahahaha! GO WINGS!!!!
ramboBrad 2 years ago
You can take that dump Wrigley...goes well with the rest of your city.
jKeIfLfLkYiOrUk 2 years ago
A classic ballpark is a dump?
PatsSoxCeltsHawks 2 years ago
You have an interesting username. No Bruins? Im not talking shit, just curious.
metalrya 2 years ago
I'm actually in Chicagoland, but support 3 Boston teams and one Chicago team. Just do, don't know why
PatsSoxCeltsHawks 2 years ago
bruins suck !!!!!!!!!!!
2rubysoho 2 years ago 3
Gotta hand it to them after blowing the lead to finish us off...for the moment. A fine series with 3 fantastic finishes but we're SO DEEP! I have a feeling we'll be seeing you guys in the post season again several times in the next 10 or so years.
kobraf150 2 years ago
i love how everyone hates on the Wings. Sorry you guys are to about to be beat by the best team in the world right now, were just too good.
Red Wings are gonna repeat this year!!!
xJDunlimitedx 2 years ago
As you saw in Game 4. It WAS luck! Muahahaa!!! GO RED WINGS!!!!! We OWNED you! So just keep replaying this video. It's as good as it's gonna get for ya Slackhawks!
ramboBrad 2 years ago
wth is up with the annoying train horn. almost as annoying as shouting "GOALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL"
farfromfiction 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hey people of the interweb my name is travis i'm 19 and on the heart transplant list, so i thought it would be a good idea to buy a HD camera and start a HT video diary, check it out tell me what you think.
traviswar19 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Wanna Hear Some Great Music?
YOUTUBE SEARCH: Yung Bally
THIS KID IS THE NEXT BIG THING!!!! :)
YOUTUBE SEARCH: Yung Bally
YOUTUBE SEARCH: Yung Bally
CopY/Paste around Youtube OR DIE!!!!
GuapCommittee 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Wanna Hear Some Great Music?
YOUTUBE SEARCH: Yung Bally
THIS KID IS THE NEXT BIG THING!!!! :)
YOUTUBE SEARCH: Yung Bally
YOUTUBE SEARCH: Yung Bally
CopY/Paste around Youtube OR DIE!!!!
GuapCommittee 2 years ago
for some reason my replies arent going where they should...hopefully those i responded to will be able to figure it out
1523Elizabeth 2 years ago
Lmao when Osgood throw his stick at 0:42 FUCKING DEAL WITH IT BICTCH YOU LOST!!!!!!
ghrbman96 2 years ago
He didn't throw it? I don't see a throwing motion.
Brexdon 2 years ago
Beat the red wings/ mary anne hossa
See you in the Cup
Go Pens
bwg5009 2 years ago
We will beat those wins this series and will see the Penguins in the Stanly cup
ghrbman96 2 years ago
i would love to see a pens vs hawks stanley cup final. go kick detroits ass blackhawks. we hate those pricks just as much, if not more, than you guys do.
damoose28 2 years ago
I would love to see the Hawks and pens in the stanly cup two
ghrbman96 2 years ago
Comment removed
ghrbman96 2 years ago
Not a "hawks" fan, but I'd have to say that goal was better than Lebron's shot last night. Great night in sports last night. ...Go pens
rycam418418 2 years ago
Ya, I'm a bigger fan of hockey than basketball but you are delusional or not all there in the head if you think that goal was more majestic than the end to the Cavs/Magic game.
stupidazns 2 years ago
Ya;'ll got LUCKY that is all that win was. LUCK. No skill involved. It takes skill to come back from 3-0 without one of our most productive players (Datsyuk) and a BS ejection. Soak it up while you can Slackhawk fans. It'll be over for you soon. LET'S GO RED WINGS!!!!
ramboBrad 2 years ago
um weve come back from 3 goal deficits too...
and that was not luck...that was an awesome pass by pahlsson over to sharp...
1523Elizabeth 2 years ago
How did he make that pass....I couldn't even see it!!! Holy Crap what a play
Kartracer6 2 years ago
dude for real...i didnt even realize that pahlsson did that until i got home and watched the repaly on youtube...fucking amazing, pahlsson had a great game on fri
1523Elizabeth 2 years ago
I hope we beat out these disgrace to hockey red wings. They started the series playing good hockey then started losing and started playing their typical hurt players to win type of hockey. Why can't they just win a game like real teams do not have to play cheap shit
Kartracer6 2 years ago
What? As an unbiased observer I have thought both teams have played pretty fair. Maybe you are upset that your team is probably going to lose to a much better Red Wings team?
yfz01 2 years ago
no I'm upset at watching us play the red wings and every game we start winning they then start cheap shotting. It's common of Detroit. Just poor
Kartracer6 2 years ago
Your talking about that hit during the first period, correct? I didn't think that was a bad hit. The guy put his head down when he had the puck, that's asking for it in hockey...
yfz01 2 years ago
I'm talking Kornwalls cheap shot on Havlat the interference major which got him ejected then Staurt tried another cheap shot in Game 4 they injured Kane during the regular season then tried to reinjure him in the winter classic and also tried to injure our goalie in the classic. It's a joke
Kartracer6 2 years ago
Yeah... A lot of people (including me) don't think that was a cheap shot. He didn't leave his feet until after making contact or lead with his elbow. Kornwall(?) has a history of leaving his feet though, so I can see why people thought that it was a cheapshot. In the NHL the players need to have their head on a swival...
yfz01 2 years ago
The biggest reason the ref threw him out was cause he played Havlat not the puck.
Kartracer6 2 years ago
clean hit buddy go review it he had the puck and saw kron coming quit crying
jbomma93 2 years ago
interference was called because he didn't have possesion of the puck. But yet you say he had possesion. hmm funny how that works. hey what ever gets you cups right....lol Detroit's gotta be good at at least 1 sport LOL they might just fall off the map if they aren't.
Kartracer6 2 years ago
If you call those hits a cheap shot Kartracer6 then you are not a fan of hockey. Those hits were as clean as Bill Cosby's stand-up comedy. Just cause it happened to your lil boy band of slackhawks doesn't take away the fact that they were clean. If it happened to a Wing I'd say, "Damn, nice hit, BS call." GO RED WINGS!!!!!
ramboBrad 2 years ago
Oh, and YOU'RE a joke, we SMOKED you in the WE WINter Classic. I was at a bar down the street and LOVED every second of it!
ramboBrad 2 years ago
You moron 6-4 is hardly smoked. LOL proves Detroit couldn't beat us with out injuring players...pretty pathetic i know. I love it. I guess when a team realizes they have so much weight on his shoulders they throw out their classiness and respect to get a win anyway they can.
Kartracer6 2 years ago