Twilight is a BS fradulent POS perpetrated with much success by a truly talentless "writer" who got really really lucky with prepubescent teenage girls who lack taste, discernment and intelligence.
@skylur44 Oh man I hate that crap, I don't know who is more dumb, the idiots who encouraged Meyer to write it and publish it or the gullible ones who read it.
when the gypsy underwent transformation, he became a full wolf. when larry talbot underwent the change, he became something that seemed somewhat wolfish and somewhat manlike. thus it seems that werewolfism has stages, so that, in the early stages, the person in the switching becomes a being that is both wolfish and manlike until he switches back to human, and yet, in later stages ( if the person lives that long ), the person in the switching becomes a full wolf until he switches back to human.
I noticed that too. Although it could have been in the original script. Curt Siodak was a man who fled from Nazi Germany and his script for this was symbolic to men changing into animals of sorts. The original idea was to have it so we never knew if Larry was actually a werewolf, or if it was just in his own mind. Universal rewrote it so it would be a monster movie however. And of course you couldn't have the wolf play a person's part all the way through the movie. Still makes you wonder though.
scenes of a full wolf wouldn't have made the movie quite so interesting. scenes of a hybrid creature makes it into a real monster movie, so that the wolfman would be a creature similar to the frankenstein monster.
Yep. Alot of people seem to enjoy the more wolf-like werewolves today (I did too once, but now I prefer the more blended type). I really don't get why people can't understand The Wolfman was just the given title to him. They still call him a werewolf. It's their own vision and of course the effects back then called more for humans than puppets. Yeah I'd say having him part human makes him scarier and less like you're usual wolf. They also make him more sympathetic.
it's strange that the title was "the wolf man". the opening scene after the credits showing the book mentioned werewolves, not "wolf man". also conversation in the movie mentions wolves and werewolves, and yet i don't think that i heard anyone say "wolf man" or "wolf men". i think the title was chosen as a way to distinguish it from other movies about werewolves, including "werewolf of london".
Yep. No real difference between the two besides the title. Particularly because both this and Werewolf of London take place in England (and besides people are bound to get a bit messed up when they hear Werewolf of London istead of American Werewolf in London given that movie seems to have gotten more famous over the years but Werewolf of London is still amazing).
i saw the old movie, "werewolf of london", and yet i don't recall a lot of the details. i think that someone in london became a werewolf after eating some kind of plant grown in mountains somewhere far away, maybe the himalayas. the "wolf man" occurred in wales, not england. there's some confusion because both areas along with scotland are often called "great britain". also a lot of welsh people speak english these days.
i now see that i got it wrong about "werewolf of london". the person became a werewolf after being bitten by a werewolf in tibet, and the biting happened while the person was looking for a plant.
to balrog13571--- when i said that i got it wrong, i was referring to my earlier comment where i thought that the werewolf in "werewolf of london" had become a werewolf by eating the plant. instead, he became a werewolf after being bitten by a werewolf, and he tried to use the plant to cure his werewolfism. it seems that a person becomes a werewolf by surviving after being bitten by someone who is already a werewolf, and i haven't seen an explanation for how the first werewolf came about.
Yep. As for the first werewolf thing I don't know. People consider the story of Zeus turning a man into a wolf to be a werewolf story, but personally I find that not knowing the first werewolf's origins makes it all the more mysterious and creepy.
to balrog13571---- in that way, werewolfism is kind of like syphilis or a.i.d.s. people often talk about the ways syphilis and a.i.d.s are spread from one infested person to another person, and yet there's very little mention about the way those diseases started out. at least one person must have caught those diseases without getting it from someone else, thus making it possible for people to still catch those diseases without getting it from someone else.
Yep. There's also cases in real life of people who have an abnormal amount of hair sprouting from their face. Obviously that could have helped build the legend up alot in the old days.
i've seen videos showing these persons with tons of hair on their faces. they certainly looked like something from a monster movie, and yet they spoke and behaved like regular humans.
---------- i like the words "wolf man" and "wolfman" more than "werewolf". "werewolf" is a compound word that contains the word "were", which has pretty much disappeared from the english language. it meant "male human". these days the word is generally limited to compound words: werewolf, werecat, weretiger, asf.
years ago i saw a commedy about a family of werewolves. it seemed that each one of them was always something that looked part human and part wolf, never becoming full humans. they often ridiculed the werehyenas, whom werewolves regarded as lazy scavengers. the parent werewolves didn't like it when their daughter decided to wed a werehyena. in order to get in good with the werewolf family, the werehyena eventually killed a human and established himself as part of the family.
from wikipedia: In Ethiopia, it is traditionally believed that every blacksmith, whose trade is hereditary, is really a wizard with the power to change into a hyena. These blacksmith werehyenas are believed to rob graves at midnight and are referred to as bouda]. They are viewed with suspicion by most countrymen. Belief in the bouda is also present in Sudan, Tanzania and Morocco where the Berber people regard the bouda as a man who nightly turns into a hyena and resumes human shape at dawn.
Okay then. That might work with that legend of The Beast of Gévaudan as there was some consideration that the jaws of the murderous creature were those of a hyena. It's a big werewolf legend in France. I wonder if people ever heard that Ethiopian legend?
Lon Chaney's the only man I know that cna say "I saw you through a telescope in my room" and get away with it xD. He rules. And even though Lugosi doens't have muc hof a part in this every second of him as Bela is awesome! I heard there was supposed to be a scene of Bela observing his own "funeral" as the sequels show there's a bit more difficulty to killing a werewolf than they originally said, but they dropped it. Well the Wolfman could have ended with this, but the sequels are still fun.
to balrog13571---- the sequels to " the wolf man" were fine, and yet it seemed so fakey that the wolf man came back alive. most likely, universal studios would have made the first wolf man movie a bit differently if they had known that they would make sequels.
Yeah. As I said once before I heard that there was an original idea to have a scene where Bela is watching his own funeral so it would make more sense than him dying and Larry not. This could be a basis maybe for other horror monsters and villains that don't die like the slashers of the 70's-80's. It could have ended here, but the sequels are fun. It's weird to think that the last movie for the Wolfman was with Abott and Costello, but I think the story really ends with House of Dracula.
i'm not sure whether the movie with abott and costello could really be regarded as a sequel to previous movies involving the wolfman and dracula and frankenstein's monster. i likely saw parts of the abbott and costello movie when i was a young kid, and i'm not so sure that i would care to see it again. having those monsters meet abbott and costello is a bit like having them go to disney world. i think "house of frankenstein" was good, and yet i didn't think "house of dracula" was so good.
True. I also don't really consider the Abott and Costello movie to be a real sequel. Just a fun little gag on them. House of Dracula had an interesting idea, but after all the previous movies it doens't make much sense to say that the Wolfman and Dracula are monsters because of rare blood diseases and pressure on the brain. I don't know any blood disease that causes you to turn into a bat. House of Frankenstein was good but the Monster got much less screen time in it and the sequels than before.
seems that dead wolfmen come back to life if/when the light of a full moon hits their dead bodies, as is seen in "frankenstein meets the wolf man". maybe would be better to burn or tear up the dead bodies of wolf men.
seems that wolfmen are almost always shown as highly anti-social, and their behavior would likely get them excluded from the good country clubs. can you think of any movie that showed wolfmen in a more positive way ?
Maybe these new movies like Underworld and I suppose Twilight, but I don't really consider Twilight to be good unlike the classic vampire and werewolf movies. Underworld is also mainly a fun B movie. Still the way people are portraying them they seem to be getting more social in a way. Although I prefer that tragic werewolf legend. It's bee ndone before, but it's the best werewolf idea to me. It makes you feel for the character more.
to balrog13571----- it's been nice talking to you. i think that we've covered all the bases regarding wolfmen. i can't think of anything else to write about them. feel free to write to me on youtube or my channel. for now, i think that i'm getting off the wolfman obsession. so long.
Men were much handsome and suave back in the good old days. They also had good manners. Men today,I should say,boys today need a lesson in manners,respect and suave from men from the past. Also,suits should be mandatory 4 men today 2 wear,instead of those baggy ass pants and shit. Boys today need 2 learn respect and etiquette.
Coming from a man, a straight man, I completely agree with your sentiments.
Although, I wouldn't heap all the blame onto guys. Recently guys have gotten it on a plate (for the lack of a better phrase) without being chivalrous and without having showing any kind of manners, so they've become lazy.
Women should make work men for their love and for their affection; I hate getting things too easy.
@BlackenedForLife Was Chaney technically be considered overweight today, or was that just muscle? I'm just curious, Lon Chaney Jr is one of my favorite actors ever and I was just wondering this because I heard the average weight for a man who is 6'2 is around 185, and Chaney's weight sounds like way too much for a man his height
lon cheny jr really kik that ww ass pity he got bit tho fukt him right up for rest of movie
pievspie 2 weeks ago
he very persist
bettyboop181000 4 months ago
@bettyboop181000 Why?
cstoczyn 4 months ago
This Is Filmed In 1940
cstoczyn 4 months ago
BOO!!!!!
cstoczyn 4 months ago
Happy Halloween!!!!
cstoczyn 4 months ago
Long Live The Wolfman!!!!
cstoczyn 4 months ago
no.. no... no... lol the autumn moon is coming soon uh ohhh>>
Not2commonofcaurse 5 months ago
@Not2commonofcaurse GASP!!!!
cstoczyn 4 months ago
@cstoczyn that's funny.... that's the same thing the wolfman said
Not2commonofcaurse 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Not2commonofcaurse O I C
cstoczyn 4 months ago
Bela Lugosi, I can't believe this is 10 years after "Dracula"
CutandPrintFilms 9 months ago 2
@CutandPrintFilms MMM HMM
cstoczyn 4 months ago
LUGOSI! 4:02
Runningtail 1 year ago
@Runningtail Long Time No See, Huh?
cstoczyn 4 months ago
those twlight bitches said wolfman stoled twlight from them =0 sorry for my spelling everyone
crazynick66 1 year ago 2
Bela: i'm gonna kill you being a werewolf
Lon: hey, you were not a vampire?
Bela: well, uuhhmm...
Lon: whatever, DIE!!!
JaviLee36 1 year ago
@JaviLee36 LOL
cstoczyn 4 months ago
Jenny is Mrs Fuddle on the early Blondies.
jrwel14 1 year ago
This a small role for Bela Logosi. 10 years before he was big box office in Dracula. I have'nt seen the new Wolfman yet. I hope it's good.
sleedolfine15 1 year ago 2
@sleedolfine15 It`s Lugosi and " Dracula " came out in 1931 , this was 1941 ! AFTER !
1993MovieMan 1 year ago
@1993MovieMan OMG!
cstoczyn 4 months ago
@sleedolfine15 The Wolfman remake sucked, I'm a die hard fan of The Wolf Man and even I thought it sucked.
WeylandYutaniInc91 1 year ago
did he call the werewolf a bitch at 7:39?
pleeppleep 1 year ago
@pleeppleep Uh I don't think so. It sounded like he was just grunting.
megers67 1 year ago
Twilight is not even close to Wolfman
Stjzify2 1 year ago
@Stjzify2 your right twlight fags thing jacob will kill the wolfman 1941 or 2010 in a sec im like wtf the wolfman is a classic\
crazynick66 1 year ago
That is a real Horror classic...
MelnStarscream 1 year ago 2
"Twilight" will be forgotten in a few years were this move has lived on for decades.
aqinthe 1 year ago
@aqinthe Amen to that, man... I hate Twilight...
MelnStarscream 1 year ago
I'm 42 years old I enjoyed watching this classic stuff as a kid growing up down in Dallas, Texas.
Keith
keithdcobbin1 1 year ago
is that Bella Legosi?
bmaclean13 2 years ago
Yes, he plays Bela the gypsy.
skylur44 1 year ago
7:43
1941: "This is unseemly!"
2010: "What's so violent about that?"
Proof the world's going to Hell.
ShadowoOfBlood 2 years ago
You can't even begin to compare a classic like this to shit like Twilight.
senorbellaco 2 years ago 51
Twilight is a BS fradulent POS perpetrated with much success by a truly talentless "writer" who got really really lucky with prepubescent teenage girls who lack taste, discernment and intelligence.
skylur44 1 year ago 3
@skylur44 Ha HA ...I concur my friend.
supergoddamn 1 year ago
@supergoddamn Thank you, good to know there are people out there who are not Twilight fans, God help us.
skylur44 1 year ago
@skylur44 Oh thank you! Thank you! I am so glad to hear you say that because it is the damn truth.
orlandobabe 1 year ago
@orlandobabe You're more than welcome! My pleasure, believe me! (0:
skylur44 1 year ago
@skylur44 Oh man I hate that crap, I don't know who is more dumb, the idiots who encouraged Meyer to write it and publish it or the gullible ones who read it.
orlandobabe 1 year ago
@orlandobabe I know, the decline of civilization courtesy of Ms Meyers, the most talentless woman ever to attain such success.
skylur44 1 year ago
@skylur44 Amen!
orlandobabe 1 year ago
@skylur44 I totally agree... SUch an idiotic bunch of wasted paper to write this shit...
MelnStarscream 1 year ago
@MelnStarscream The scary part is, it is so popular, but then, so is Justin Beiber. Go figure.
skylur44 1 year ago
@skylur44 The world's going strait to hell XD Tjis is only the begining lol
MelnStarscream 1 year ago
@senorbellaco
I know that's right
theladybluone 1 year ago
@theladybluone Me 2
cstoczyn 4 months ago
the one that comes out on february looks awesome the remake.
michaelforthriller 2 years ago 17
when the gypsy underwent transformation, he became a full wolf. when larry talbot underwent the change, he became something that seemed somewhat wolfish and somewhat manlike. thus it seems that werewolfism has stages, so that, in the early stages, the person in the switching becomes a being that is both wolfish and manlike until he switches back to human, and yet, in later stages ( if the person lives that long ), the person in the switching becomes a full wolf until he switches back to human.
coventrygardens 2 years ago
I noticed that too. Although it could have been in the original script. Curt Siodak was a man who fled from Nazi Germany and his script for this was symbolic to men changing into animals of sorts. The original idea was to have it so we never knew if Larry was actually a werewolf, or if it was just in his own mind. Universal rewrote it so it would be a monster movie however. And of course you couldn't have the wolf play a person's part all the way through the movie. Still makes you wonder though.
balrog13571 2 years ago
scenes of a full wolf wouldn't have made the movie quite so interesting. scenes of a hybrid creature makes it into a real monster movie, so that the wolfman would be a creature similar to the frankenstein monster.
coventrygardens 2 years ago
Yep. Alot of people seem to enjoy the more wolf-like werewolves today (I did too once, but now I prefer the more blended type). I really don't get why people can't understand The Wolfman was just the given title to him. They still call him a werewolf. It's their own vision and of course the effects back then called more for humans than puppets. Yeah I'd say having him part human makes him scarier and less like you're usual wolf. They also make him more sympathetic.
balrog13571 2 years ago 2
it's strange that the title was "the wolf man". the opening scene after the credits showing the book mentioned werewolves, not "wolf man". also conversation in the movie mentions wolves and werewolves, and yet i don't think that i heard anyone say "wolf man" or "wolf men". i think the title was chosen as a way to distinguish it from other movies about werewolves, including "werewolf of london".
coventrygardens 2 years ago
Yep. No real difference between the two besides the title. Particularly because both this and Werewolf of London take place in England (and besides people are bound to get a bit messed up when they hear Werewolf of London istead of American Werewolf in London given that movie seems to have gotten more famous over the years but Werewolf of London is still amazing).
balrog13571 2 years ago
i saw the old movie, "werewolf of london", and yet i don't recall a lot of the details. i think that someone in london became a werewolf after eating some kind of plant grown in mountains somewhere far away, maybe the himalayas. the "wolf man" occurred in wales, not england. there's some confusion because both areas along with scotland are often called "great britain". also a lot of welsh people speak english these days.
coventrygardens 2 years ago
i now see that i got it wrong about "werewolf of london". the person became a werewolf after being bitten by a werewolf in tibet, and the biting happened while the person was looking for a plant.
coventrygardens 2 years ago
No you got it right. He was bitten in Tibet but he went back to his home in England. It had two werewolves in the movie.
balrog13571 2 years ago
to balrog13571--- when i said that i got it wrong, i was referring to my earlier comment where i thought that the werewolf in "werewolf of london" had become a werewolf by eating the plant. instead, he became a werewolf after being bitten by a werewolf, and he tried to use the plant to cure his werewolfism. it seems that a person becomes a werewolf by surviving after being bitten by someone who is already a werewolf, and i haven't seen an explanation for how the first werewolf came about.
coventrygardens 2 years ago
Yep. As for the first werewolf thing I don't know. People consider the story of Zeus turning a man into a wolf to be a werewolf story, but personally I find that not knowing the first werewolf's origins makes it all the more mysterious and creepy.
balrog13571 2 years ago
to balrog13571---- in that way, werewolfism is kind of like syphilis or a.i.d.s. people often talk about the ways syphilis and a.i.d.s are spread from one infested person to another person, and yet there's very little mention about the way those diseases started out. at least one person must have caught those diseases without getting it from someone else, thus making it possible for people to still catch those diseases without getting it from someone else.
coventrygardens 2 years ago
Yep. There's also cases in real life of people who have an abnormal amount of hair sprouting from their face. Obviously that could have helped build the legend up alot in the old days.
balrog13571 2 years ago
i've seen videos showing these persons with tons of hair on their faces. they certainly looked like something from a monster movie, and yet they spoke and behaved like regular humans.
---------- i like the words "wolf man" and "wolfman" more than "werewolf". "werewolf" is a compound word that contains the word "were", which has pretty much disappeared from the english language. it meant "male human". these days the word is generally limited to compound words: werewolf, werecat, weretiger, asf.
coventrygardens 2 years ago
Yep.
balrog13571 2 years ago
years ago i saw a commedy about a family of werewolves. it seemed that each one of them was always something that looked part human and part wolf, never becoming full humans. they often ridiculed the werehyenas, whom werewolves regarded as lazy scavengers. the parent werewolves didn't like it when their daughter decided to wed a werehyena. in order to get in good with the werewolf family, the werehyena eventually killed a human and established himself as part of the family.
coventrygardens 2 years ago
from wikipedia: In Ethiopia, it is traditionally believed that every blacksmith, whose trade is hereditary, is really a wizard with the power to change into a hyena. These blacksmith werehyenas are believed to rob graves at midnight and are referred to as bouda]. They are viewed with suspicion by most countrymen. Belief in the bouda is also present in Sudan, Tanzania and Morocco where the Berber people regard the bouda as a man who nightly turns into a hyena and resumes human shape at dawn.
coventrygardens 2 years ago
Okay then. That might work with that legend of The Beast of Gévaudan as there was some consideration that the jaws of the murderous creature were those of a hyena. It's a big werewolf legend in France. I wonder if people ever heard that Ethiopian legend?
balrog13571 2 years ago
to balrog13571--- imagine what it's like being a blacksmith in a country where people believe that kind of legend.
coventrygardens 2 years ago
5:45 - if you go to see a fortune teller and thats how he reacts its time to start shitting yourself.
gabbygall 2 years ago
Bela Lugosi can do more with a handful of dialogue than a lot of actors can with a whole movie full of it. He's so damn good.
RalphWiggum08 2 years ago
Lon Chaney's the only man I know that cna say "I saw you through a telescope in my room" and get away with it xD. He rules. And even though Lugosi doens't have muc hof a part in this every second of him as Bela is awesome! I heard there was supposed to be a scene of Bela observing his own "funeral" as the sequels show there's a bit more difficulty to killing a werewolf than they originally said, but they dropped it. Well the Wolfman could have ended with this, but the sequels are still fun.
balrog13571 2 years ago
to balrog13571---- the sequels to " the wolf man" were fine, and yet it seemed so fakey that the wolf man came back alive. most likely, universal studios would have made the first wolf man movie a bit differently if they had known that they would make sequels.
coventrygardens 2 years ago
Yeah. As I said once before I heard that there was an original idea to have a scene where Bela is watching his own funeral so it would make more sense than him dying and Larry not. This could be a basis maybe for other horror monsters and villains that don't die like the slashers of the 70's-80's. It could have ended here, but the sequels are fun. It's weird to think that the last movie for the Wolfman was with Abott and Costello, but I think the story really ends with House of Dracula.
balrog13571 2 years ago
i'm not sure whether the movie with abott and costello could really be regarded as a sequel to previous movies involving the wolfman and dracula and frankenstein's monster. i likely saw parts of the abbott and costello movie when i was a young kid, and i'm not so sure that i would care to see it again. having those monsters meet abbott and costello is a bit like having them go to disney world. i think "house of frankenstein" was good, and yet i didn't think "house of dracula" was so good.
coventrygardens 2 years ago
True. I also don't really consider the Abott and Costello movie to be a real sequel. Just a fun little gag on them. House of Dracula had an interesting idea, but after all the previous movies it doens't make much sense to say that the Wolfman and Dracula are monsters because of rare blood diseases and pressure on the brain. I don't know any blood disease that causes you to turn into a bat. House of Frankenstein was good but the Monster got much less screen time in it and the sequels than before.
balrog13571 2 years ago
seems that dead wolfmen come back to life if/when the light of a full moon hits their dead bodies, as is seen in "frankenstein meets the wolf man". maybe would be better to burn or tear up the dead bodies of wolf men.
coventrygardens 2 years ago
Yep.
balrog13571 2 years ago
seems that wolfmen are almost always shown as highly anti-social, and their behavior would likely get them excluded from the good country clubs. can you think of any movie that showed wolfmen in a more positive way ?
coventrygardens 2 years ago
Maybe these new movies like Underworld and I suppose Twilight, but I don't really consider Twilight to be good unlike the classic vampire and werewolf movies. Underworld is also mainly a fun B movie. Still the way people are portraying them they seem to be getting more social in a way. Although I prefer that tragic werewolf legend. It's bee ndone before, but it's the best werewolf idea to me. It makes you feel for the character more.
balrog13571 2 years ago 3
to balrog13571----- it's been nice talking to you. i think that we've covered all the bases regarding wolfmen. i can't think of anything else to write about them. feel free to write to me on youtube or my channel. for now, i think that i'm getting off the wolfman obsession. so long.
coventrygardens 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Twilight. :-) Now that's a real wolfman. Only a member of Team Jacob would ever understand this.
geoscience 2 years ago
i've never seen any of the twilight episodes.
coventrygardens 2 years ago 2
my sister likes twilight and she likes jacob
she said that the wolfman is better
and hes the real WOLFMAN NOT JACOB
MrTEZUKAFOREVER 2 years ago 2
the werwolves in twilight were CGI crap. evan if you ignore all the messed up vampires and wolves the story is complete and utter crap.
bmaclean13 2 years ago 11
is that dracula... the fortune teller guy?
DewaynesWorldTV 2 years ago
yep, Bella LeGosie Dracula himself
CyberSpartan66 2 years ago
they completely forgot abt the other gal who was attacked by the wolf haha
MrJojotheclown123 2 years ago
like 2 see dis in colour.
skeleion 2 years ago
am i the only one who thought Bela Lougousi looked a little bit like Joseph Stalin? with the mustache and everything?
foxesV 2 years ago 7
he really dose...lol
two2ten10eleven11 2 years ago
Well, considering that he was Hungarian, he does look more like Russian.
idiaitatisarkoudas 2 years ago
Thank you xmamushka
JARVImyFRIEND 2 years ago
that's sexual harrassment mr. cheney
cheovl9 2 years ago 6
That forest set is very effective.
GoblinXXX 2 years ago 7
Men were much handsome and suave back in the good old days. They also had good manners. Men today,I should say,boys today need a lesson in manners,respect and suave from men from the past. Also,suits should be mandatory 4 men today 2 wear,instead of those baggy ass pants and shit. Boys today need 2 learn respect and etiquette.
WETNWILD85 3 years ago 2
quite rich, coming from 'wet and wild'...
diefortacos 3 years ago 7
HA HA HA HA HA HAAH
NickGoossen 3 years ago
THANK U (:
WETNWILD85 3 years ago 2
Coming from a man, a straight man, I completely agree with your sentiments.
Although, I wouldn't heap all the blame onto guys. Recently guys have gotten it on a plate (for the lack of a better phrase) without being chivalrous and without having showing any kind of manners, so they've become lazy.
Women should make work men for their love and for their affection; I hate getting things too easy.
TopherT1979 2 years ago
chaney was a big man. About 6-2 and 220lbs. He had very broad shoulders
BlackenedForLife 3 years ago
@BlackenedForLife Was Chaney technically be considered overweight today, or was that just muscle? I'm just curious, Lon Chaney Jr is one of my favorite actors ever and I was just wondering this because I heard the average weight for a man who is 6'2 is around 185, and Chaney's weight sounds like way too much for a man his height
71crm 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
no offense ppl but i cant stand that fag bela lugosi.ever since he played a romanian count(dracula)...i hate this guy
TatooineBoy 3 years ago
It's great!
FilmTraum8 3 years ago
Chaney was a pimp.
ludehead 3 years ago
He needs some platform shoes and a big goblet to go with his cane.
GoblinXXX 2 years ago 4
Chaney was the man!
Tim010987 3 years ago 6
so fuckin cool my only fear ever
ballkicker19 3 years ago
Lon Chaney is so freakin' charismatic!
thejmfry 3 years ago 7
wow Lon Chaneys got game lol
ghostbuster56 3 years ago 5
Thanks for uploading this entire movie,I was happy to find it.
plasticsoulman66 3 years ago 2
I don't know about england but in america we call that sexual harrasment
Limejello10512 3 years ago 2
I love Lon Chaney!!!!!
VVPirategeishaVV 3 years ago 5
One of my favorites. I remember watching it on my grandma's tiny TV set when I was little.
mooreentstudios 3 years ago 4
Really Good movie! Seen Lots of Times.
Alexhalulko 3 years ago 6