Dawkins was completely right here, pointing out that Ward's statements about learning more about God are in fact humans thinking on what they THINK God "must" intend, based on evolved human morality, not the bible.
Again, Ward is making up his own definitions.
"It's quite clear" that you have to ask for things by praying for them the same way that Jesus prayed in Gesthemene, and if you do that then you will receive what you ask for.
I somewhat agree that we should follow reason and evidence. That is why people should follow Judaism (or at least the 7 universal laws of Noah). "Judaism" which is really the Torah is based on scientific evidence. Check on youtube- "Rabbi Mizrachi Torah and Science , or Divineinformation". please comment back AFTER watching it.
You can really tell how far evolutionary psychology has come since the late 90's. So many of these questions are completely dismissable today through proper evolutionary, survival-driven psychology that produces other profitable outcomes which appear designed.
It's funny how many of Shmuley's arguments are allowed to pass here. Compare this to Hitchens' and Dawkins' use of psychology and philosophy to own him recently.
Go straight to hell and rot Shmuley Boteach! You're a thief, liar and a crook who stoles hundreds from innocent children's. You're a money hungry devil worshiper! DON'T BUY HIS BOOKS!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I notice that at 2:52 Professor Ward is cut off and the filming skips some of his comments. I can't get his full arguemnt. Looks like atheism lost this debate either way.
one thing's for sure, there was a LOT of coughing in this debate.
valiant21920 7 months ago in playlist Shmuley Boteach vs Richard Dawkins Debate - Oxford 1996
The moral argument form the religious again... oh well, I guess they don't have anythisng else.
DaGavinX 1 year ago
dawkins got owned, he even denied this debate happened, and was embarresed when he found out it was taped.
SgtAndrewM 1 year ago
I walked by the building where I had the gorgeous pleasure of listening to Richard give a talk a few months ago. That was a great great night!
anetchi 1 year ago
Dawkins was completely right here, pointing out that Ward's statements about learning more about God are in fact humans thinking on what they THINK God "must" intend, based on evolved human morality, not the bible.
Again, Ward is making up his own definitions.
"It's quite clear" that you have to ask for things by praying for them the same way that Jesus prayed in Gesthemene, and if you do that then you will receive what you ask for.
HUH?? It's quite clear?
queenastilon 1 year ago 2
I somewhat agree that we should follow reason and evidence. That is why people should follow Judaism (or at least the 7 universal laws of Noah). "Judaism" which is really the Torah is based on scientific evidence. Check on youtube- "Rabbi Mizrachi Torah and Science , or Divineinformation". please comment back AFTER watching it.
extazy17 2 years ago
You can really tell how far evolutionary psychology has come since the late 90's. So many of these questions are completely dismissable today through proper evolutionary, survival-driven psychology that produces other profitable outcomes which appear designed.
It's funny how many of Shmuley's arguments are allowed to pass here. Compare this to Hitchens' and Dawkins' use of psychology and philosophy to own him recently.
songcycle 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Go straight to hell and rot Shmuley Boteach! You're a thief, liar and a crook who stoles hundreds from innocent children's. You're a money hungry devil worshiper! DON'T BUY HIS BOOKS!
MsSarcia 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I notice that at 2:52 Professor Ward is cut off and the filming skips some of his comments. I can't get his full arguemnt. Looks like atheism lost this debate either way.
yistackness 2 years ago
5.50 Owned
lewisner 2 years ago
Too much damn coughing..
jhje 3 years ago 9