Oh they used this technology in Avatar. I don't know if they just gave up on it or mixed it with motion capture (cuz I'm sure motion capture was used too)
The real trick is taking that capture and putting it on a completely different model. THAT is the point of all this. I mean, filming all that of emily, just to generate the exact same thing in CGI, is rather pointless.
I appreciate how much progamming and technical engineering and have to admit i was totally convinced that this was film footage of Emily's face, so image quaility is awesome. To translate facial movements into a software programme will be an amazing asset for the games industry and save many hours of wearing reflective balls and motion capture time
So really this is not photo realistic computer graphics in the strictest sense. It's like watching pre rendered footage in video game trailers and such like. What i would like to see is real time footage like in Avatar the movie (although the movie footage was pre rendered) including hair animation, body animation from a wide variety of angles which i think we are still a few years away from doing.
Oh i see what has been done. The have placed the animated face over Emily's normal face and blended the animated face in with the rest of her head, so the hair is not animated nor is her clothes and body. So essentially what we are seeing is a mixture of computer animated graphics and film footage which changes the whole ball game.
@chotolarg Uhhh of course it's keyframe animation... EVEN IF IT WAS motion capture with one camera you would go back to keyframe animation to teak the final product
This has been flagged as spam show
I´m an actress and you can put your fucking Uncanny Valley in your ass, you stupid insensible people, who do not appreciate what is art.
That monster has no soul, and you will never be able to reproduce a digital soul.
So, stop trying this stupid things, and instead, try to make something with a little bit of depht and beauty
lucialerendegui 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I´m an actress and you can put your fucking Uncanny Valley in your ass, you stupid insensible people, who do not appreciate what is art.
That monster has no soul, and you will never be able to reproduce a digital soul.
So, stop trying this stupid things, and instead, try to make something with a little bit of depht and beauty
lucialerendegui 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I´m an actress and you can put your fucking Uncanny Valley in your ass, you stupid insensible people, who do not appreciate what is art.
That monster has no soul, and you will never be able to reproduce a digital soul.
So, stop trying this stupid things, and instead, try to make something with a little bit of depht and beauty
lucialerendegui 1 year ago
Oh they used this technology in Avatar. I don't know if they just gave up on it or mixed it with motion capture (cuz I'm sure motion capture was used too)
7610111610510010597 1 year ago
Emily is sexy!
StateCCM 1 year ago
The real trick is taking that capture and putting it on a completely different model. THAT is the point of all this. I mean, filming all that of emily, just to generate the exact same thing in CGI, is rather pointless.
CraziFuzzy 1 year ago 7
@CraziFuzzy
Well this was mostly just a test, to see if they had truly eliminated the uncanny valley from movie and video gam animation.
Jesstyriddle 10 months ago
Yea this is good, but there is always something too smooth about a computer generated face
JHmagic1 1 year ago
wow this is amazing
dj02tc5 1 year ago
The only thing is that when she talks in the actual video, her mouth moves EVERYWHERE. Especially when she smiles.
KimdraElliottVoelkel 1 year ago
What's so creepy about this?
TreuloseTomate 1 year ago
i dont get it
allperty 1 year ago
creepy....
ht tp://w ww.cracked.com/article_18867_5-creepy-wa ys-humans-are-plunging-into-uncanny-va lley_p2.ht ml
ht tp:// ww w .cracke d.com/article_1886 7_5-creepy-way s-humans-are-pl unging-into-un canny- va lley.html
(remove spaces)
worldpeace4bugs 1 year ago
its the eyes.....
DakotaStyle27 1 year ago
Almost there. In a few years we wont be able to differentiate a human from animation
darthlopez 1 year ago
1:04-1:08...........Agghhhh! It's the Mysterious Stranger!
thebrokenrattle 1 year ago
1:46 is scary
PirateMcSandwich 1 year ago
This is what next gen consoles will be about
psychonaut25 1 year ago
the face was off by a little.
puleknow 1 year ago
That's funny, she plays Janna in The Young and the Restless!
kwizd94 1 year ago
we need this in videogames XD
wario22 1 year ago
@wario22 it will be there, but it's expensive for video games at this time
featheredmusic 1 year ago
Emily is hot! =)
Sonnypjim09 1 year ago
this is amazing
zweisteinJ 1 year ago
I appreciate how much progamming and technical engineering and have to admit i was totally convinced that this was film footage of Emily's face, so image quaility is awesome. To translate facial movements into a software programme will be an amazing asset for the games industry and save many hours of wearing reflective balls and motion capture time
11Grayfox11 1 year ago
I wonder who will discover the program that crosses the "Uncanny Valley" first ?
11Grayfox11 1 year ago
So really this is not photo realistic computer graphics in the strictest sense. It's like watching pre rendered footage in video game trailers and such like. What i would like to see is real time footage like in Avatar the movie (although the movie footage was pre rendered) including hair animation, body animation from a wide variety of angles which i think we are still a few years away from doing.
11Grayfox11 1 year ago
Oh i see what has been done. The have placed the animated face over Emily's normal face and blended the animated face in with the rest of her head, so the hair is not animated nor is her clothes and body. So essentially what we are seeing is a mixture of computer animated graphics and film footage which changes the whole ball game.
11Grayfox11 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I want to see her vagina action
f00kumofo123 2 years ago
lawl oh common
Corshmell 2 years ago
amazing
bloodz4lyfniggas 2 years ago
Damn! Should be a long keyframe job for the facial animations over a long sequence...:S
BartMaxx 2 years ago
nop, its motion capture done with only 1 camara
chotolarg 2 years ago 2
@chotolarg Uhhh of course it's keyframe animation... EVEN IF IT WAS motion capture with one camera you would go back to keyframe animation to teak the final product
gevelegian 2 years ago 6
Oh yeah, I always use keyframe animation. Programs where you can't teak the final product drive me crazy!
teetertoter3 2 years ago