It's really scarey that there are people out there who are so stupid. They are of the same vain as that nut-job leader of Iran who thinks the Holocaust is a fabrication.
some idiots here saying the blueness was the UV coating, answer this would you see the colour blue in darkness? if you read the apollo lunar journal,they had to use the sun as a guide as they couldnt see or use the stars and they could see a crescent earth meaning the sun would only be shining through one window thus the blueness of the coating would be visible through that one window but in the video both windows were blue and am supposed to just accept that?since when is science religion?
It just seems How Stupid and Mentally Degraded some People are commenting on Falsehoods and such , when they have never been to space , Never been to NASA , Never been to the Russian Space program , Never Flew a Plane and for that matter never Did anything significant in their lives .....Other than debunk Facts . They are what we call Computer warriors Typing away their Brain damaged Filth for all the Morons in the World to Hear . Its a Pity that 75 % of the people of the World are Plain Idiots.
i'm sorry, are you saying that the apollo program was a complete hoax? Well, consider this; 3 brave astronauts died in a fire ON THE LAUNCH PAD! Do you really think that NASA would kill 3 men on purpose? They were all under 50 years old, I mean, you're stupid!
Also, Apollo 13 was running out of breathable oxygen and when they got back Fred Haise had a disease which was diagnosed by NASA and non-NASA doctors.
NASA can fire a laiser at the moon which can reflect, proving that they've been there.
@mikeydude67 Though I believe we landed on the moon I however have to warn you in your assumptions. When speaking in the realm of possibilities one has to realize that NASA at that time was in midst of history. You had lying sons of bitches in the office that got us into Vietnam with every means available. NASA was run by the fed which monopolized and compartmentalized every aspect including the millions that worked on the project so that full picture was never seen but only that what was shown.
@mikeydude67 Also don't forget that at that time we also had NASA full of nazi's who's crimes in the past pale in comparison to what they could continue doing. The very fact Gus Grissom was an outspoken critic was a threat. His family believes it was done on purpose and these 3 astronauts had their communication cut off at that moment just before the fire. In fact when his son went to check his capsule he found a metal plate intentionally placed behind the controls to start the fire.
@mikeydude67 So with all due respect as the saying "if you can't make it, fake it" there's a very real possibility that our last resort in case we couldn't make the moon we had a back up plan to stage it. And this to me is what NASA wants to ignore. I believe they landed on the moon and did some real things and to further sell it to the American public they used their own staged set to add more touch. I mean I understand the fuzzy ones that are real but the clear ones you have to watch out for.
@mikeydude67 And as far as the laser point at the exact spot on the moon. Its a fact you can beam this laser at any part of the moon and it will beam back as it does reflect the sun's solar rays which gives us light in the night. So take it with a grain of salt but let people be people. If we landed on the moon its not an American achievement, but a human achievement. And if we didn't then we are after all proof that we are faulty humans. End of story.
Absolute, 100% proof. And steel sinks because it's heavier than water, that's why 90,000 ton aircraft carriers sink and planes can't fly because they're heavier than air etcetera etcetera.
It's fascinating to think that these conspiracy fruitcakes choose to ignore the over 30 minutes of footage of the astronauts floating in zero gravity (well, micro gravity) and select some glare on a window as 'proof' of some conspiracy........
Perhaps they need to disable the 'net at the asylum.......
everything that brit and that lady say can be argued easily when the brit was talking about the name odyssey and acquarius they would talk about that to represent their space shuttle and the lady was talking about blue in the window 2 things the camera angle can be shot towards the earth,and what color is water on earth?thats what i thought also the color of the camera is quality only the 70's had its not like its gunna be in 1080p also havnt u ever seen the blue tint are your car window?We Went
For me the best proofs are more about physics than images. They travelled into Space, and they went on the moon. We should have had time dilation. It is relativity. it means when somebody goes into space, time is not the same for them than us. I think time should be slower on the moon for us. All those moon videos are too well synchronized.
blue.... hmmmm floating in low earth orbit would achieve the desired effect there, out of sight of the world, anything could happen...and it did, in space, no-one can see you lie.
@b6gm6n Except for the Soviets, UK, and pretty much the rest of the world that is tracking your space craft. And the equipment they left behind, such as reflectors far lasers, offer undeniable proof that man had placed them there.
The reason that the windows are blue is because, there is UV coating on them, go out to your car and look at the top of your windshield, nearly all modern cars have polarized UV coating along the top to protect from sun blindness.
@Photoguy7482 Generally not, but you're ignoring the fact that there's no night and day in space. It is always day, except when they go to the dark side of the moon. Even so, the poor film quality does not properly represent how everything really looked.
omfg these guys can't be serious. They chose the songs because a SCRIPT?!? I guess they couldn't have possibly chose them because of the names of the 2 vehicles. that would be just tooooo much of a coincidence. And FYI the windows are blue because of the anti-UV coating on them. It produces the same effect as the atmosphere on sunlight by turning blue. These people really need to get a life and take a science course.
@ccc771 Who're you? Some dingus who took grade 11 physics and read Dark Moon? Boy, you know everything now. You think NASA, a government organization, would allow this kind of stuff to be released to the public. This was under Nixon's office too, one of the most paranoid presidents of all time. Check out the "bad astronomy" website. Offers great debunks of moon hoax theories.
@thesnorklemonkey in answer to your questions NO im not dingus?what ever that is.. i didn't do gr11 physics. ive never read Dark Moon no need, i know very well NO man has ever walked on the moon. Well yes i do believe this footage here was released to the public, sad thou it is ! Nixon paranoid ! more like totally corrupt and someone who had an inability to ever tell the truth. As for Bad Astronomy website? its exactly that "Bad Astronomy" put together by some Apollogist.
@ccc771 There is no viable argument against the moon landings anymore. Every single one has been debunked. Bad Astronomy does a great job at debunking your crackpot "theories" and you know it. Know why you deny the landings? Because you're a "nonconformist" who likes to believe that something unimaginably extraordinary can be created when millions of people pull together as a nation, as a people, to bring dreams and a promise to life. People like you kill hope.
@thesnorklemonkey im not going to endlessly go though all the science and anomalies of the moon hoax there are just to many and have better things to do with my life. im not about killing hope im about getting to truth of the lies and deception governments like the United States get up to ! That includes the Russian government at the time, they also lied in there Space program when it suited them.
@ccc771 You're just an anti-government kind of guy then. Because every single anomaly I have found has been debunked by Phil Plait, NASA, National Geographic, and scientists around the world. It's also art due to the fact that many of the things recorded on the moon couldn't possibly be faked with the technology in the late 60's. Like how the lunar dust kicked up off the LRV whels in an absolutely perfect parabola. Nothing can create that effect.
@ccc771 What has Nixon to do with the Lunar landings? He had nothing to do with the plannings and building of the rockets and spaceships. He became president when everything was ready, and only scored points by having his autograph on a plaque left on the Moon by the astronauts. He had no interest in space, and killed the Apollo project prematurely. So, he being a liar, doesn't mean the scientists lied.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Beautiful song Aquarius - indeed we are entering that age and it will last for more than 2000 years! I wonder when the first real moon landing will happen...
Getting to the moon was simple physics and engineering. America would not mobilize thousands of people and billions of dollars for this project for 10 years just to fake something. WE WENT TO THE F*CKING MOON IDIOTS. 6 TIMES.
This was pretty sad and demented. Not really a revelation about anything. I hate to think there are people this delusional out there and they even have money to produce crap like this.
What was the first speaker talking about? I cant make anything out of what hes getting at. It just looks like hes trying too hard to find somthing out of nothing. Someone explain plz.
You know, Apollo missions were tracked oticlly by telescopes by gfollowing the ventings. Shortly AFTER the explosion, it was quite obvious to watching astronomers the world over that something was wrong because of the huge and unscedualed 'dump'. You can find photos on the internet if you look.
listen, "mate"... you said we never landed on the moon. so, cut the wise ass crap, and provide some facts to back up your claim. and no, this video and the Aquarius instance is not enough to convince anyone of your bogus claims.
J: Isn't it ironic that technicians from Australia used their ingenuity to make Armstrong stepping off the LM a visual world event. Perhaps you should consult with the guys out at the Parkes antenna or Honeysuckle MSFN tracking station and tell them all about "The Moon Hoax". I'm quite sure they'd all agree with your analysis and buy you a drink.
our government is so far up your governments ass they dont no any better, there dumb fucks too. Like i've said, if u could get to the moon in the 70's a number of times, i'm sure by now they would be going more often, but no, coz technology is to good these days to prove that it's a crock. Go outside of the U.S and not many people believe it happened. The U.S use to be a big powerful country and now there losing power and respect. Same goes with 911, everyone smells something fishy there 2.
u went 7 times in 3 years, 6 "made it" but haven't been back. There is no evidence to show anyone's ever been to the moon. Just NASA's 'word'. There is so much evidence to prove it's all faked. eg: flag moving in the breeze when there's no wind on the moon. Photo's with shadow's going in diff directions, Pictures of Armstrong's 'first step' were takin from the ground, the Sun sends off solar flares that human couldn't with stand that far out in space, thats why Russia never went.
look at the moment when the luna module departs the surface of the moon.....the camera pans the module ( moves up) as it moves up towards the heavens..who was panning the module? nobody was left behind the moon. even if the camera was left on a tripod...it should not follow the module as it left the moon... go figure....its a fake ...a hoax ....
The camera on the Luna rover had these things called 'servos', they allowed Mission Control to pan the camera up and down, side to side and zoom in and out. It's the same advanced technology as a toy remote control car.
It was panned by remote from earth. Yes, they had to practice it ahead of time because of the 1.3 second delay.
God, you people are idiots! You REALLY think NASA would miss that? And the waving flag? And fill lighting? And no stars? Grow up.
If you watch enough film, you'll see that the rover camera is being operated by remote trough the whole mission. And to the bitch who doesn't know crap, the sun was shining directly on the windows. They refract light. No, it does NOT have to be black.
it was controlled by remote and you know it. they even had an interview with the guy who did it. he had to send the command to pan up 1.5 secs or so before they fired the ascent motor so that the command would arrive at the right time. He did it on a whim as it wasn't a planned shot. I can debunk every one of your so called pieces of evidence.
@pentogram23 Are you fucking retarded? Every single ascent of the lunar module was filmed by a camera placed on a servo that was controlled from mission control in Houston. The command to pan the camera upwards was issued 1.3 seconds prior to lift-off due to the delay caused by the massive distance from the Earth to the Mon.
start an object moving in a vacuum (ie flag) and it keeps moving without friction. light refracts off different reflective surfaces at different angles when those surfaces are uneven. there was indeed a solar flare when armstrong and aldrin were there. it was on the side of the sun OPPOSITE the moon.
@jaydenclinch America's been to the moon many times since 1972, just not manned missions. Sending rovers, satellites, and the lot is safer, cheaper, and more practical. Imagine how an administration would look after a failed moon landing. They'd be so harshly criticized, they'd be run out of office.
I could keep going on forever.Stanley Kubrick made a movie called 2001 Space odyssey which back then was ahead of its time with filming and trick photography.After the movie he was employed by NASA,bit suspect.David Persey was an award winning photographer who is 100% photos were faked.11 astronauts killed before moon landing, 8 suspicious, 7 in plane crashes, 1 car. Julian Scheer worked for NASA, after being fired he showed a private viewing to show how it could be faked and then was murdered.
J: I saw 2001 when it was released, and many times after. Kubrick was a genius, but not perfect. Take a real good look at those moon scenes and see if they would pass your scrutiny as the real thing. Odds are, not.
And what about every other world photographer besides Persey who said it was real. Could they all be fooled EN MASSE ?
Finally, as far as astronaut fatalities, you're in the classic mode of every conspiracy theorist, with only suppositions to support your view.
the war has cost moren dan 5 trillion and the goverment gave 700 billion to the banks and wallstreet and i 4got how much more billions 2 da outo companies EXPENSIVE my ass hahaha
poor iakny. No idea, feel sorry 4 u that u think your country actually landed on the moon, if they could do it 40 years ago, they could do it today. Sorry but you've been sucked in by your country once again, it's sad really.
Oh, and by the way, we ARE going back to the moon. As a matter of fact, we are gonna build a place there where the Astronauts will live for extended period of time. Then we will be sending them to Mars, while your sorry ass will sit there and wonder why the Aussies couldn't do something like this.
we never went to the moon, The U.S.A wanted to beat Russia there so they they faked it even when Russia said it was impossible because the human body couldnt survive and if they could go there in the 70's im sure we would have the technology to go there now, Americans should be disgraced at their Government, not just for the moon landings but faking 9/11 to save their economy, the U.S Goverment is a joke.
notice if you actually watch the clip you see no 'proof' of anything. if instead that silly woman had gone into space with a replica of the apollo13 vehicles and taken pictures to compare it to we would have something. i just want to point out that anyone's 'analysis' of any videos is simply an opinion. nothing more than an opinion. its all suposition about how they think things should look.
Notice if you actually look at the window you can make 2 observations 1. ice/condensation forming on the windows, 2 the sun is shining in the windows. So obviously you wont be able to so the blackness of space too well out the obstructed windows you idiot.
You conspiracy people are a joke. NASA is sending astronauts back to the moon by the year 2020. You shit heads have plenty of time to prove this one is fake. Anyone who believes this crap is either: 1. an idiot 2. mental patient 3. eating lead paint 4. was beat on the head with a rubber mallat by their mother since they were born. 5. exposed to high levels of radiation 6. has rabbies 7. thinks Al Gore is a scientist. 8. all of the above.
Was she there in that module? Come on, is she actully stretching the obsurd conspiracy addicts notion that man didn't even go to space?? One thing is for sure, she has a book to sell
Blue sky in their windows - who they are fooling that they fly on the Moon?! You gotta be kidding me, if you really believe manking went to the Moon 40 years ago and can't go there now...
you are a complete idiot, making unqualified accusations the notice the blue colour only exists in the windows on the side of the sun, the blue is an effect of the sun on the filters planced in the windows
the reason why they don't go to the moon now, could possibly due to 2 reason i've just thought of when reading ur comment. "why should we go to the moon?" & another being how dangerous it could be, they have more technology now, which a whole redesign would be done, somehow using the shuttle and it would take years of planning and money which is pointless the only way they would possibly go to the moon again to by testing the spacecraft which will eventually go to mars, if that becomes possible.
there is some evidence that the moon has a relatively large amount of helium3 bound into its regolith. helium3 could be used as part of the fuel in a fusion reactor... VERY clean power
There are a few things wrong with this comment of yours. First they don't fly on the moon. They fly around the moon while astronauts walk on the it. It's Mankind not manking. Then the last thing it's not that we CAN'T fly to the moon, it's that we won't. It's been explored several times before and Nasa doesn't have the money to go back. If we have the technology to have people live in space for months at a time, why wouldn't they be able to land them on the moon?
There are a few things wrong with this comment of yours. First they don't fly on the moon. They fly around the moon while astronauts walk on the it. It's Mankind not manking. Then the last thing it's not that we CAN'T fly to the moon, it's that we won't. It's been explored several times before and Nasa doesn't have the money to go back. If we have the technology to have people live in space for months at a time, why wouldn't they be able to land them on the moon?
You are an idiot!!!
p40f20 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
APOLLO MICKEY MOUSE MISSIONS
1968-1972
DeadJesus100 4 months ago
DISNEY MOONLANDINGS
FUCK THE US NWO GOVT = NAZI NASA
DeadJesus100 5 months ago
@DeadJesus100 take your medicine son
badgerattoadhall 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@badgerattoadhall take your medication retard and keep on fucking your flag hillybilly
DeadJesus100 4 months ago
It's really scarey that there are people out there who are so stupid. They are of the same vain as that nut-job leader of Iran who thinks the Holocaust is a fabrication.
ToolBag48 6 months ago
@ToolBag48 you are a nutjob believing in nasa fairy tale moonlandings
DeadJesus100 5 months ago
One small point. The quality of the 'walkman' is too godd not to have been pre-arranged and overdubbed or added after.
markshep777 9 months ago
some idiots here saying the blueness was the UV coating, answer this would you see the colour blue in darkness? if you read the apollo lunar journal,they had to use the sun as a guide as they couldnt see or use the stars and they could see a crescent earth meaning the sun would only be shining through one window thus the blueness of the coating would be visible through that one window but in the video both windows were blue and am supposed to just accept that?since when is science religion?
azraelblame 10 months ago
Comment removed
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@azraelblame They did not use the sun as guide because they were tracked from stations on Earth. And they had star navigation with star maps.
You are not supposed to accept anything, unless a bit of common sense would be in order?
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
@azraelblame What do you mean in darkness? The sun is clearly shining through the other window! The window looks blue because it is in sunshine!
BjornPalmen 9 months ago
It just seems How Stupid and Mentally Degraded some People are commenting on Falsehoods and such , when they have never been to space , Never been to NASA , Never been to the Russian Space program , Never Flew a Plane and for that matter never Did anything significant in their lives .....Other than debunk Facts . They are what we call Computer warriors Typing away their Brain damaged Filth for all the Morons in the World to Hear . Its a Pity that 75 % of the people of the World are Plain Idiots.
MikeWilson1977 11 months ago
@MikeWilson1977 Teen girls do it.
AndyHarglesis 10 months ago
The space between the Earth and the Moon is not "deep space". That was the sun shining through the windows, dummies.
jtkirkfan2002 1 year ago
all research adds up. Men did land on the moon and you conspiracy people are just fruitcakes like people have said. I mean, you're totally LAME!
mikeydude67 1 year ago
@mikeydude67
And why exactly the light coming from the window is blue, son of a stupid whore?
potrodsas 1 year ago
i'm sorry, are you saying that the apollo program was a complete hoax? Well, consider this; 3 brave astronauts died in a fire ON THE LAUNCH PAD! Do you really think that NASA would kill 3 men on purpose? They were all under 50 years old, I mean, you're stupid!
Also, Apollo 13 was running out of breathable oxygen and when they got back Fred Haise had a disease which was diagnosed by NASA and non-NASA doctors.
NASA can fire a laiser at the moon which can reflect, proving that they've been there.
mikeydude67 1 year ago
@mikeydude67 Though I believe we landed on the moon I however have to warn you in your assumptions. When speaking in the realm of possibilities one has to realize that NASA at that time was in midst of history. You had lying sons of bitches in the office that got us into Vietnam with every means available. NASA was run by the fed which monopolized and compartmentalized every aspect including the millions that worked on the project so that full picture was never seen but only that what was shown.
strizhi 11 months ago
@mikeydude67 Also don't forget that at that time we also had NASA full of nazi's who's crimes in the past pale in comparison to what they could continue doing. The very fact Gus Grissom was an outspoken critic was a threat. His family believes it was done on purpose and these 3 astronauts had their communication cut off at that moment just before the fire. In fact when his son went to check his capsule he found a metal plate intentionally placed behind the controls to start the fire.
strizhi 11 months ago
@mikeydude67 So with all due respect as the saying "if you can't make it, fake it" there's a very real possibility that our last resort in case we couldn't make the moon we had a back up plan to stage it. And this to me is what NASA wants to ignore. I believe they landed on the moon and did some real things and to further sell it to the American public they used their own staged set to add more touch. I mean I understand the fuzzy ones that are real but the clear ones you have to watch out for.
strizhi 11 months ago
@mikeydude67 And as far as the laser point at the exact spot on the moon. Its a fact you can beam this laser at any part of the moon and it will beam back as it does reflect the sun's solar rays which gives us light in the night. So take it with a grain of salt but let people be people. If we landed on the moon its not an American achievement, but a human achievement. And if we didn't then we are after all proof that we are faulty humans. End of story.
strizhi 11 months ago
Absolute, 100% proof. And steel sinks because it's heavier than water, that's why 90,000 ton aircraft carriers sink and planes can't fly because they're heavier than air etcetera etcetera.
It's fascinating to think that these conspiracy fruitcakes choose to ignore the over 30 minutes of footage of the astronauts floating in zero gravity (well, micro gravity) and select some glare on a window as 'proof' of some conspiracy........
Perhaps they need to disable the 'net at the asylum.......
HeathLedgersChemist 1 year ago
everything that brit and that lady say can be argued easily when the brit was talking about the name odyssey and acquarius they would talk about that to represent their space shuttle and the lady was talking about blue in the window 2 things the camera angle can be shot towards the earth,and what color is water on earth?thats what i thought also the color of the camera is quality only the 70's had its not like its gunna be in 1080p also havnt u ever seen the blue tint are your car window?We Went
sweeney280 1 year ago
these two british people love to make conspiracies
ExcelSub 1 year ago
Yawn. ZZZZZZ. Sad conspiracy theory crap.
brooklyndrive 1 year ago
If the windows weren't polarized, the sun's rays out in deep space would fry your eyes.
Santaclausemikey 1 year ago
For me the best proofs are more about physics than images. They travelled into Space, and they went on the moon. We should have had time dilation. It is relativity. it means when somebody goes into space, time is not the same for them than us. I think time should be slower on the moon for us. All those moon videos are too well synchronized.
NikoisBack 1 year ago
@NikoisBack The moon is much too close for that to create any effect whatsoever.
thesnorklemonkey 1 year ago
You got love The Aussies,They can really tell when some ones bullshitting them
stiffkneck 2 years ago
This video is bullshit. Explain:
evidence men landed on the moon:
•astrophysicists, astronomers, aerospace engineers from all countries agree.
•1,000s of NASA employees & no whistle blowing
•842 lbs. of lunar samples verified by international geologists
•USSR & the UK tracked Apollo missions & monitored transmissions
•1,000s of photos & dozens of hrs of video/film
•Russian Premier Alexei Kosygin congratulated US
•Millions watched launches. 1,000s watched splashdowns.
ptraiders40 2 years ago
I didnt make this video but wish I did have. A superb insight into the way our governments have screwed us good.
Easydollars 2 years ago
Fuck this video and fuck the people that made it.
TheJomogogo 2 years ago
blue.... hmmmm floating in low earth orbit would achieve the desired effect there, out of sight of the world, anything could happen...and it did, in space, no-one can see you lie.
b6gm6n 2 years ago
@b6gm6n Except for the Soviets, UK, and pretty much the rest of the world that is tracking your space craft. And the equipment they left behind, such as reflectors far lasers, offer undeniable proof that man had placed them there.
thesnorklemonkey 1 year ago
The reason that the windows are blue is because, there is UV coating on them, go out to your car and look at the top of your windshield, nearly all modern cars have polarized UV coating along the top to protect from sun blindness.
GunsOfThePhoenix 2 years ago 11
@GunsOfThePhoenix Yea but are ur car windows blue at night???
Photoguy7482 1 year ago
@Photoguy7482 well its not night in space and the have THE SUN which can make that the color thats y they have a blue-ish tint ASSWHIPE
sweeney280 1 year ago
@sweeney280 Learn how to type before u comment back to me.
Photoguy7482 1 year ago
@Photoguy7482 Generally not, but you're ignoring the fact that there's no night and day in space. It is always day, except when they go to the dark side of the moon. Even so, the poor film quality does not properly represent how everything really looked.
thesnorklemonkey 1 year ago
@Photoguy7482 HA HA!...Well said!
DramaDon83 1 year ago
omfg these guys can't be serious. They chose the songs because a SCRIPT?!? I guess they couldn't have possibly chose them because of the names of the 2 vehicles. that would be just tooooo much of a coincidence. And FYI the windows are blue because of the anti-UV coating on them. It produces the same effect as the atmosphere on sunlight by turning blue. These people really need to get a life and take a science course.
tomboi1978 2 years ago 7
@tomboi1978 I agree, after I did all my research and looked up every official NASA video on youtube, I now believe wut ur saying is true.
Photoguy7482 1 year ago
so many gaffs were made by NASA its hard to believe there's still people out there who believe it was real.
Im just waiting on NASA's the next Movie to come out about Buzz's Monolith orbiting around Mars every 7 hours.
The people at NASA watched 2001... 1 to many times as this Doco clearly demonstrates.
Its making great comedy keep it going im loving it!
ccc771 2 years ago
How's the Australian Space Program moving along?
Are you still unable to get a Kangaroo to eat enough vegemite and steroids so that he's strong enough to kick you into LEO?
flanksteak1 2 years ago
@ccc771 Who're you? Some dingus who took grade 11 physics and read Dark Moon? Boy, you know everything now. You think NASA, a government organization, would allow this kind of stuff to be released to the public. This was under Nixon's office too, one of the most paranoid presidents of all time. Check out the "bad astronomy" website. Offers great debunks of moon hoax theories.
thesnorklemonkey 1 year ago
@thesnorklemonkey in answer to your questions NO im not dingus?what ever that is.. i didn't do gr11 physics. ive never read Dark Moon no need, i know very well NO man has ever walked on the moon. Well yes i do believe this footage here was released to the public, sad thou it is ! Nixon paranoid ! more like totally corrupt and someone who had an inability to ever tell the truth. As for Bad Astronomy website? its exactly that "Bad Astronomy" put together by some Apollogist.
ccc771 1 year ago
@ccc771 There is no viable argument against the moon landings anymore. Every single one has been debunked. Bad Astronomy does a great job at debunking your crackpot "theories" and you know it. Know why you deny the landings? Because you're a "nonconformist" who likes to believe that something unimaginably extraordinary can be created when millions of people pull together as a nation, as a people, to bring dreams and a promise to life. People like you kill hope.
thesnorklemonkey 1 year ago
@thesnorklemonkey im not going to endlessly go though all the science and anomalies of the moon hoax there are just to many and have better things to do with my life. im not about killing hope im about getting to truth of the lies and deception governments like the United States get up to ! That includes the Russian government at the time, they also lied in there Space program when it suited them.
ccc771 1 year ago
@ccc771 You're just an anti-government kind of guy then. Because every single anomaly I have found has been debunked by Phil Plait, NASA, National Geographic, and scientists around the world. It's also art due to the fact that many of the things recorded on the moon couldn't possibly be faked with the technology in the late 60's. Like how the lunar dust kicked up off the LRV whels in an absolutely perfect parabola. Nothing can create that effect.
thesnorklemonkey 1 year ago
@ccc771 What has Nixon to do with the Lunar landings? He had nothing to do with the plannings and building of the rockets and spaceships. He became president when everything was ready, and only scored points by having his autograph on a plaque left on the Moon by the astronauts. He had no interest in space, and killed the Apollo project prematurely. So, he being a liar, doesn't mean the scientists lied.
YDDES 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Beautiful song Aquarius - indeed we are entering that age and it will last for more than 2000 years! I wonder when the first real moon landing will happen...
VannaTroms 2 years ago
Getting to the moon was simple physics and engineering. America would not mobilize thousands of people and billions of dollars for this project for 10 years just to fake something. WE WENT TO THE F*CKING MOON IDIOTS. 6 TIMES.
strataircom715 2 years ago
you idiots believe thats real... ????.
pentogram23 2 years ago
Gay.
This was pretty sad and demented. Not really a revelation about anything. I hate to think there are people this delusional out there and they even have money to produce crap like this.
TexasArcane 3 years ago 3
weak
notbendable 3 years ago
What was the first speaker talking about? I cant make anything out of what hes getting at. It just looks like hes trying too hard to find somthing out of nothing. Someone explain plz.
Guiseppe98 3 years ago
lol nice research "the words used to announces their accident to Houston we have a problem"
Apollo 13 said "Houston we've HAD a problem" way to do your research.
FORZION 3 years ago
You know, Apollo missions were tracked oticlly by telescopes by gfollowing the ventings. Shortly AFTER the explosion, it was quite obvious to watching astronomers the world over that something was wrong because of the huge and unscedualed 'dump'. You can find photos on the internet if you look.
loperspest 3 years ago
listen, "mate"... you said we never landed on the moon. so, cut the wise ass crap, and provide some facts to back up your claim. and no, this video and the Aquarius instance is not enough to convince anyone of your bogus claims.
iakny 3 years ago 2
good luck gettin to the moon, "It's one small step for man, one giant crock of shit"
jaydenclinch 3 years ago
your wisecracks don't help your cause. They only make you look like a bigger dumbass than you already are.
have a nice day, mate! :-)
iakny 3 years ago
J: Isn't it ironic that technicians from Australia used their ingenuity to make Armstrong stepping off the LM a visual world event. Perhaps you should consult with the guys out at the Parkes antenna or Honeysuckle MSFN tracking station and tell them all about "The Moon Hoax". I'm quite sure they'd all agree with your analysis and buy you a drink.
Then again, maybe not.
Ravenflight104 3 years ago
our government is so far up your governments ass they dont no any better, there dumb fucks too. Like i've said, if u could get to the moon in the 70's a number of times, i'm sure by now they would be going more often, but no, coz technology is to good these days to prove that it's a crock. Go outside of the U.S and not many people believe it happened. The U.S use to be a big powerful country and now there losing power and respect. Same goes with 911, everyone smells something fishy there 2.
jaydenclinch 3 years ago
J:
I could care less what people believe. I care about facts, not opinions. Opinions are cheap and easy to manufacture.
It seems to me that your real issue here is
that Apollo has the letters " UNITED STATES "
on the sides of the spacecraft. If it were
"CCCP", I doubt you'd say a word.
It's funny that people like yourself spit on us, but when the shit hits the fan, we are the ones that get the call for help.
Oh, we haven't gone back to the moon because its very, very expensive.
Ravenflight104 3 years ago
u went 7 times in 3 years, 6 "made it" but haven't been back. There is no evidence to show anyone's ever been to the moon. Just NASA's 'word'. There is so much evidence to prove it's all faked. eg: flag moving in the breeze when there's no wind on the moon. Photo's with shadow's going in diff directions, Pictures of Armstrong's 'first step' were takin from the ground, the Sun sends off solar flares that human couldn't with stand that far out in space, thats why Russia never went.
jaydenclinch 3 years ago
look at the moment when the luna module departs the surface of the moon.....the camera pans the module ( moves up) as it moves up towards the heavens..who was panning the module? nobody was left behind the moon. even if the camera was left on a tripod...it should not follow the module as it left the moon... go figure....its a fake ...a hoax ....
pentogram23 2 years ago
The camera on the Luna rover had these things called 'servos', they allowed Mission Control to pan the camera up and down, side to side and zoom in and out. It's the same advanced technology as a toy remote control car.
loperspest 2 years ago 3
It was panned by remote from earth. Yes, they had to practice it ahead of time because of the 1.3 second delay.
God, you people are idiots! You REALLY think NASA would miss that? And the waving flag? And fill lighting? And no stars? Grow up.
If you watch enough film, you'll see that the rover camera is being operated by remote trough the whole mission. And to the bitch who doesn't know crap, the sun was shining directly on the windows. They refract light. No, it does NOT have to be black.
Astrobrant2 2 years ago
it was controlled by remote and you know it. they even had an interview with the guy who did it. he had to send the command to pan up 1.5 secs or so before they fired the ascent motor so that the command would arrive at the right time. He did it on a whim as it wasn't a planned shot. I can debunk every one of your so called pieces of evidence.
tomboi1978 2 years ago 2
@pentogram23 Are you fucking retarded? Every single ascent of the lunar module was filmed by a camera placed on a servo that was controlled from mission control in Houston. The command to pan the camera upwards was issued 1.3 seconds prior to lift-off due to the delay caused by the massive distance from the Earth to the Mon.
thesnorklemonkey 1 year ago
start an object moving in a vacuum (ie flag) and it keeps moving without friction. light refracts off different reflective surfaces at different angles when those surfaces are uneven. there was indeed a solar flare when armstrong and aldrin were there. it was on the side of the sun OPPOSITE the moon.
tomboi1978 2 years ago
They haven't been back because the risks are no longer acceptable to spineless politicians and administrators.
tomboi1978 2 years ago 2
@jaydenclinch America's been to the moon many times since 1972, just not manned missions. Sending rovers, satellites, and the lot is safer, cheaper, and more practical. Imagine how an administration would look after a failed moon landing. They'd be so harshly criticized, they'd be run out of office.
thesnorklemonkey 1 year ago
I could keep going on forever.Stanley Kubrick made a movie called 2001 Space odyssey which back then was ahead of its time with filming and trick photography.After the movie he was employed by NASA,bit suspect.David Persey was an award winning photographer who is 100% photos were faked.11 astronauts killed before moon landing, 8 suspicious, 7 in plane crashes, 1 car. Julian Scheer worked for NASA, after being fired he showed a private viewing to show how it could be faked and then was murdered.
jaydenclinch 3 years ago
J: I saw 2001 when it was released, and many times after. Kubrick was a genius, but not perfect. Take a real good look at those moon scenes and see if they would pass your scrutiny as the real thing. Odds are, not.
And what about every other world photographer besides Persey who said it was real. Could they all be fooled EN MASSE ?
Finally, as far as astronaut fatalities, you're in the classic mode of every conspiracy theorist, with only suppositions to support your view.
Ravenflight104 3 years ago
iakny
They can't prove anything. The ding dongs who believe this horse shit suffer from a mental illness. There's no other way to explain it.
As for jaydenclinch, the civil engineer, he doesn't have a clue. He doesn't know anything beyond designing roads and water treatment plants.
apollo1268 3 years ago
the war has cost moren dan 5 trillion and the goverment gave 700 billion to the banks and wallstreet and i 4got how much more billions 2 da outo companies EXPENSIVE my ass hahaha
elpimp21 2 years ago
its funny, I see the same blue reflection on my car's window, when I park it under a very bright overhead light, at night....
someone failed 5th grade science, and wrote a book about moon landings being fake...?
thats the stupidest shit I have ever heard.
iakny 3 years ago 2
poor iakny. No idea, feel sorry 4 u that u think your country actually landed on the moon, if they could do it 40 years ago, they could do it today. Sorry but you've been sucked in by your country once again, it's sad really.
jaydenclinch 3 years ago
Oh, and by the way, we ARE going back to the moon. As a matter of fact, we are gonna build a place there where the Astronauts will live for extended period of time. Then we will be sending them to Mars, while your sorry ass will sit there and wonder why the Aussies couldn't do something like this.
iakny 3 years ago
Google "NASA Orion"
then prove it is a hoax.
iakny 3 years ago
I guess this bitch never heard of reflections?
ikvsabre 3 years ago
we never went to the moon, The U.S.A wanted to beat Russia there so they they faked it even when Russia said it was impossible because the human body couldnt survive and if they could go there in the 70's im sure we would have the technology to go there now, Americans should be disgraced at their Government, not just for the moon landings but faking 9/11 to save their economy, the U.S Goverment is a joke.
jaydenclinch 3 years ago
they are, but you are 100,000 times more of a joke.
Enjoy fantasyland.
ikvsabre 3 years ago
I think your in fantasy land u dick-wod, PS- Nice name u clown.
jaydenclinch 3 years ago
blah blah blah.
me: engineer
you: doofus
any questions?
ikvsabre 3 years ago
haha, im a civil engineer so suck my cock mother fucker
jaydenclinch 3 years ago
Then you are a BAD engineer.
ikvsabre 3 years ago
Prove it.
iakny 3 years ago
notice if you actually watch the clip you see no 'proof' of anything. if instead that silly woman had gone into space with a replica of the apollo13 vehicles and taken pictures to compare it to we would have something. i just want to point out that anyone's 'analysis' of any videos is simply an opinion. nothing more than an opinion. its all suposition about how they think things should look.
AlTilly 3 years ago
Notice if you actually look at the window you can make 2 observations 1. ice/condensation forming on the windows, 2 the sun is shining in the windows. So obviously you wont be able to so the blackness of space too well out the obstructed windows you idiot.
reid777 3 years ago
You conspiracy people are a joke. NASA is sending astronauts back to the moon by the year 2020. You shit heads have plenty of time to prove this one is fake. Anyone who believes this crap is either: 1. an idiot 2. mental patient 3. eating lead paint 4. was beat on the head with a rubber mallat by their mother since they were born. 5. exposed to high levels of radiation 6. has rabbies 7. thinks Al Gore is a scientist. 8. all of the above.
apollo1268 3 years ago
Was she there in that module? Come on, is she actully stretching the obsurd conspiracy addicts notion that man didn't even go to space?? One thing is for sure, she has a book to sell
66hoopick66 3 years ago
ur kidding right? lol its amazing how desperate conspiracists go to try and make proof that doesnt exist.
woodman19 3 years ago 2
Blue sky in their windows - who they are fooling that they fly on the Moon?! You gotta be kidding me, if you really believe manking went to the Moon 40 years ago and can't go there now...
trodas 3 years ago
you are a complete idiot, making unqualified accusations the notice the blue colour only exists in the windows on the side of the sun, the blue is an effect of the sun on the filters planced in the windows
l3inaryl3urnout 3 years ago 2
the reason why they don't go to the moon now, could possibly due to 2 reason i've just thought of when reading ur comment. "why should we go to the moon?" & another being how dangerous it could be, they have more technology now, which a whole redesign would be done, somehow using the shuttle and it would take years of planning and money which is pointless the only way they would possibly go to the moon again to by testing the spacecraft which will eventually go to mars, if that becomes possible.
benjicash 3 years ago
there is some evidence that the moon has a relatively large amount of helium3 bound into its regolith. helium3 could be used as part of the fuel in a fusion reactor... VERY clean power
AlTilly 3 years ago
@trodas im pretty sure manking never went to the moon. we cant go there now cause we've been there and cant afford it to do pointless research.
xXJlidXx16 1 year ago
@trodas btw i was making fun of you for spelling manking.
xXJlidXx16 1 year ago
@trodas
There are a few things wrong with this comment of yours. First they don't fly on the moon. They fly around the moon while astronauts walk on the it. It's Mankind not manking. Then the last thing it's not that we CAN'T fly to the moon, it's that we won't. It's been explored several times before and Nasa doesn't have the money to go back. If we have the technology to have people live in space for months at a time, why wouldn't they be able to land them on the moon?
90agarza 8 months ago
@90agarza
Lol you are correcting spelling on youtube and yet you are a moron who believes in the disney moonlandings.
Nasa had the money to go "back" from 1973-2000 yet they never went further than 350 miles from earth since then
DeadJesus100 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@trodas
There are a few things wrong with this comment of yours. First they don't fly on the moon. They fly around the moon while astronauts walk on the it. It's Mankind not manking. Then the last thing it's not that we CAN'T fly to the moon, it's that we won't. It's been explored several times before and Nasa doesn't have the money to go back. If we have the technology to have people live in space for months at a time, why wouldn't they be able to land them on the moon?
90agarza 8 months ago