The conspiracy of 9/11, Dutch television show, Part 3/6

[wannaliveforever]

inside job - so obvious - people (sheeple) are blind

[zilverenmist]

Wtc1 8:46:26 hit / collapse 10:28:25

Wtc2 9:02:59 hit / collapse 9:59:04

time difference between hits 16:34 (Approx.15 minutes)

Time difference collapse 29:21 (Approx. 30 minutes)

It can be called mechanical strange that the building that was last hit collapsed first!

Hypothesis: if planes flew in the wrong building it would theoretically explain the difference in the time of the collapse of the towers.

Or: the building was rigged, but the timers were set wrong.

[josarhus]

@zilverenmist Or the buildings were hit different.

The south tower was hit lower and more to the side. That give you two reasons why WTC 2 collapsed first, it had to support a much heavier load (more floors above impact) with a weaker structure (plane crash caused more destruction).

Nothing strange at all.

[zilverenmist]

@josarhus That is the mechanical problem, the core column was less damaged than at the first impact.

More logic for this constuction would have been to top off the top and fall sideward. the straight collapse can be calculated over and over again, but it miss the force and power to fall straight. Why are all explosions in the basement and lobby not mentioned in the 9/11 report? Why would a building hit in the side fall straght?

[josarhus]

@zilverenmist @zilverenmist At the impacted floors the perimeter wall carried about 50 percent of the load, and as the videos show, it was the perimeter wall that breaks down first, not the core. When the perimeter wall breaks down, all load is transferred to the core and then it starts to break down.

Dont forget that 95 percent or so of the volume of the buildings was air.

[zilverenmist]

@josarhus watch?v=atSd7mxgsGY and watch?v=PSKcgYXoAzI proof otherwise. I have no reason to doubt Mr. Chandler on this. It also supports my own calculation. If it is right what you said, the concrete floors should have dropped right after the hit.

[josarhus]

@zilverenmist If the top was to fall down the side, you need to shift the center of gravity outside the perimeter wall that did not happen, far from. When the collapse starts the moving mass gains all the energy needed to fall straight down.

Again remember, that the buildings were primarily air.

Why the top does not fall to the side, is explained at page 250 here:

sites . google . com/site/911guide/drg_nist_rev­iew_2_1 . pdf

[zilverenmist]

@josarhus NIST has proven nothing, it only assumes.

[josarhus]

@zilverenmist The buildings fell straight down because of gravity. What other force should have pushed them to the side?

The explosions are mentioned in the NIST report and are perfectly explained.

[EllinonEnosis]

Ja...buiten de kranten IS een andere wereld omdat dekranten worden door de REGERING betaald DUS.....onafhankalijk.....

[zilverenmist]

@EllinonEnosis i.d.d. wie de media bezit bezit de "waarheid".

[anisuthideyakoindu]

jawel, je kan wel iets nagaan over die videotapes ivm de pentagonaanslag: zelfs dezelfde dag nog maakte men er op tv gewag van dat het FBI ALLE tapes in beslag had genomen en later bleek er nog 1 tape vergeten geweest te zijn, nl die van een hotel in de buurt, dat zijn ze dan later gaan halen

[Invesigator]

Natuurlijk vinden Nederlandse journalisten de 9/11 komplot theorie onzin anders kunnen ze hun baan verliezen. Het media is bezat door Joden.

[TheDenker64]

@Invesigator ja daar heb je helemaal gelijk in.

En ook zullen ze in de politiek altijd blijven ontkennen.

De waarheid zal uiteindelijk toch boven water komen.

Mensen die zich inzetten voor de waarheid wens ik veel succes en sterkte.