oo yeah bill how do you not realize that the koch brothers have bought each of your favorite politicians out... how do you not realize that these guys represent vulture capitalism as opposed to venture capitalism, to use newts words. lets face it... the only reason you claim to support the koch brothers is to upset liberals. you dont even care about their record. unfortunately for you... you fall victim to the mentality that your enemy's enemies are your friends.. til the koch bros screw you too
@jymstone3 true... i dont really have the time... all of the information i have was covered by several news organizations...btw it is not an opinion, but a fact, that the koch brothers have bought several congressional bills and countless politicians...
@crankycactus Thanks for your prompt reply. Bill and I started this last year because we wanted to make a difference in a positive way and have fun doing it. You have opinions, go out and try it out to see if there is a market for your ideas. If not, back to the drawing board. Frankly we don't have time either! WE MAKE IT!!!
@jymstone3 i dont have a drawing board... i am just a loud mouthed spectator.. i do certainly appreciate your positive sentiment... i will, however, not discontinue my criticism of bill... he has many unsubstantiated arguments.... and not to mention, is a big govt hypocrite...
@crankycactus Funny thing about the claim that the Koch brothers are succesful businessmen is that it was their father's business. They wouldn't have shit, including Koch Industries, if they weren't lucky enough to have inherited it.
@WesOrion i never said i hate billionaires... i hate that the koch bros fund misinformation... i hate that they buy politicians... i hate that they are keeping the rest of us down... barry is no where near a liberal messiah.. he is a centerist... you couldnt even imagine the things a real liberal progressive would do...
@crankycactus LOL, why so ignorant? Why you hate Koch brothers so much is the fact that maybe they fund truth. The misinformation is bought and paid for by the billionaires that control the MSM, Media Matters and Barry. You are just another scarred little commie freeloading liberal bitch that is about to see your Messiah fall and fall hard.
@WesOrion wow... zing... you got me... all you did was provide solid facts and a substantive rebutal... you didnt even have to use an ad hominem attack... i can see that you have figured out how to use language that really gets your point across... i understand where you are coming from... and yes i admit that you were right about me hating billionaires.. its not that i just dont want them to buy my government... i just hate them cause their rich...
@WesOrion and yes of course i also admit that he could not be a centerist after extending the bush tax cuts, prolonging the troops stay in the middle east, compromising on health care, tightening up on the drug war, bluffing about closing guantanimo,or signing the defense autorization act... you got me
@crankycactus why don't you pull that cactus out of your hind quarters, maybe you won't be so cranky? Look, if you are going to talk smart and act naive all at the same time and not see what Barry is truly doing, then you are the problem that has infected this Republic. Barry doubled the spending that Bush has done in only 3 years as to Bush's 2 FULL terms. His bailouts have done nothing, but he claims TARP as having worked, which was Bush's baby signed into law.
@crankycactus it does not take a centrist to extend, prolong or strengthen anything Bush did. Healthcare was not compromised, it was rammed up our asses. If you call keeping open borders as tightening up on the drug war, you need to take a revisited look at it. The NDAA is worse than the Patriot Act, now anybody that Barry don't like can be removed with impunity. Again, your failure to actually see whom Barry truly is.
@crankycactus They donate to conservative causes....read that as "good causes", the exact opposite of liberalism....we need more people like the Koch brothers to fight against the evil of the left.....seriously, I thank God for these guys....they are a gift.
and government control. Again, I'll ask what trendy changes you've made to make the environment better. Tell me what solutions you have come up with, as you sip your latte, to a natural weather fluctuation that you can not possibly control?
@sol3a1, I don't have to back up anything and I backed down from nothing. There is no use arguing with a hysterical person whose life is consumed with the religion of global warming. It would get me nowhere and I have far better things to do lol. Live your life as you choose, Chicken Little, and I'll live mine. The point is that your religion infringes on my rights to live a peaceful prosperous life unbridled from your skewed 'science.'
@sol3a1, it must have been the same type of 'religious wackos' that believe that normal climate fluctuation is caused by nasty, evil humans. I wonder what trendy steps you have taken to 'save' the environment. Actually, since you choose to live your life in hysteria, you better start worrying about super volcanoes, asteroids and the like- they're much more likely to get you before 'global warming' does lol
@pugilist66 "it must have been the same type of 'religious wackos' that believe that normal climate fluctuation is caused by nasty, evil humans" not "nasty evil humans" as for a long time, we didn't know what we were doing. Now we do
But I like how you changed from denying as you'll have to backup what you say than actually back up your claim there's not AWG
Care to back up the claims you made or are you going to slink out and ignore it? My vote, you'll claim victory and ignore it
Don't forget that for thousands of years, 'scientists' thought that the world was flat lol. Every generation thinks that they have all the answers and the fact is that we don't. So, quit grabbing your heads and running around scared that the world is gonna end. Chill out, embrace liberty and quit looking to the government to quell all your fears- real or imagined lol.
@pugilist66 "Don't forget that for thousands of years, 'scientists' thought that the world was flat lol" nope that was religious wackos posing as wise men. Actual scientists, such as the Greeks, knew the Earth was round
Religious Dogma from the buy-bull kept Western Civ in the Dark ages, Sun goes around the Earth, etc
"So, quit grabbing your heads and running around scared that the world is gonna end" nope the world will go on, with or without humans
The 'global warming' crowd have been caught again and again falsifying data, covering up data, and promulgating lie after lie to support the religious dogma (for that's exactly what it is) of 'global warming.' Most of their solutions are just as bad, or worse, for the environment that they claim to cherish lol. Keep running around exclaiming that the sky is falling and paying a world government for the privilege of using oxygen and expelling evil carbon dioxide if you wish, but I for one am not.
@txgp17 You seem to have missed the 8 investigations into those e-mails and which found no scientific problems. There's nothing in those e-mails: bit. ly/w1e0aH
And so what about Gore? He's a politician, even if I grant you that he made those mistakes (btw you are misrepresenting the court ruling bit. ly/yAQHof), how does a mistake by a non-scientist in any way invalidate research in the scientific literature?
Global warming denialists are starting to sound a lot like evolution denialists. You deny that which is hard for you to understand, or that which is inconvenient for your other beliefs. In any case you may have been able to convince your followers on here, but you simply cannot expect to convince a thinking person with your evidence lacking, infantile reasoning. Thanks.
@imigrant00 I'm beginning to believe in man made global warming but the same Video series that made me believe that man made global warming might be true, showed that man made global warming can be countered, just by removing the ban on Aerosols.
I don't know the mechanism behind how Aerosols work. But I think that if the solution was this simple it would have been proposed by now. I don't think there is a global conspiracy hiding the helpful effects of aerosol and I could be wrong, but I don't see why it wouldn't have been proposed as a solution by now...
@imigrant00 check out the series starting with watch?v=52KLGqDSAjo. Tell me if you find anything that shows that I'm wrong. Just to let you know if you except it as truth, it does a really good job of proving and explaining man made Global warming.
@wwhit2001 This will be the third time I'm telling you this, but you can't infer what you are saying from that video. It was explaining a question they were investigating 40 years ago. This later video from Potholer54 makes this blindingly obvious (i.e. you are over estimating the effect) watch?v=EU_AtHkB4Ms
Here is an actual breakdown of the warming we have seen and what has contributed and 'mitigated': bit. ly/xAInif
So any calculations/papers that confirm your claim?
@txgp17 "I'm sure you've heard of Climategate, where (alleged) scientists manipulated data to support their positions" then you must've read how that was not what the hackers and backers of denial thought it would be don't you?
"Most of these AGW scientists depend this hoax to pay their salaries" really? Name one and then name a "scientist" who says AGW is not real and I'll show you someone who gets funding from fossil fuel lobby
"at least 11 material falsehoods" really? Which ones?
The comment from the climate denialists of "Climate change is always happening. Its cyclic" is true but what they don't seem to know is why that happens
So Climate Change deniers, please share your wisdom and I'm sure deep knowledge on the subject of climatology, why is the warming occurring now?
How tell a real christian Luke 18:22 and if they are not doing this they do not belong in this Christian State . Can you name any Millionaire that do this ???
@painterQjensen You support the side that is taxing us to death, giving all our tax money away in interest payments, trying to control everything we do say or eat, has majority control of the news, entertainment, education and politicians and you call us sheep?
wildbill 4 american is clearly a moron that lives outside the borders of reason and sanity, ergo waste of time 2 watch and talk to, happy weekend human sheep :)
@Treetale Thank you now I know to stop globule warming all you need is aerosols and all you need to stop globule cooling is carbon dioxides. No worries, we can keep control of the weather. Thanks again Treetale.
When you global warmers start getting on the people that have wasted trillions of dollars on sham Ideas that don't stop damaging the ecology(electric cars run on coal you idiots) then and only then will you make any points.
I love the Koch brothers and their father! The left had to find a scape goat to put on to the conservative side because of how much George Soros was being exposed. BTW Soros made $8 BILLION in 2011 with the inside info he got from this administration. Those damn millionares and billionaires.
Global warming is a sham.Takes what little mind that you young ones have left and will make you slaves,Global warming =Agenda 21= NWO. It's your freedoms you are giving up to this new religion.
Rule of thumb: Liberals=miserable souls who can't stand to see happiness, unless they can steal from others, and have it for FREEEEEE! When they say it is, it is not; when they say it is not, it is. Easy to remember. They are dishonest hucksters. And... We ALWAYS hear about the "evil rich," and the "evil corporations." What about the evil, rich politicians and their cohorts, the bureaucratic masses of control freaks? What about the "evil government?" THE GOVERNMENT IS NOT THE NATION. WE ARE.
Thanks a whole heap of gratitude Bill, My own Sen Testor (D) (the famous swing vote for Obamacare) kept sending me, a mean ole conservative, wishes for campaign support to fight the mean ole Koch Bros lies about him. Well, I didn't know who the mean ole Koch Bros were, but I didn't figure they could be all bad, now thanks to you, I do. I don't mind being compared to them, heck, somewhere after Adam and Eve, I might even be related to them. Ha
Amen. I'm with you Bill. You should read the article by Timothy Sandefur of the Pacific Legal Foundation, called Compliance–or Else, The EPA’s compliance order regime creates a Hobson’s choice. It's on the Cato.org website. What those poor people are going through is enough to make anyone a Conservative.
Hello Bill, I can't say that I've ever heard of the Koch brothers before now. If they are using their fortunes to help protect American freedoms from the leftist vultures, I'd say that they are heros. Having never heard of them, I reserve judgement pending further research. I do however, enjoy a hearty laugh whenever liberals trip over themselves while attacking a patriot and unwittingly show their enemies to be the REAL good guys!
@CollinMaessen 30,000 scientists are suing A Gore over his "climate change hoax".....sorry Collin....your little money making scheme is being exposed.
@WildBillforAmerica Senator Inhofe had a list of 400 scientists who claimed global warming was a hoax. Let’s take a look at who these scientists were:
Inhofe’s list includes 413 people. (Score one Inhofe; the math holds up.)
84 have either taken money from, or are connected to, fossil fuel industries, or think tanks started by those industries.
@WildBillforAmerica Here is a good analogy. Your kid has cancer. You go see 20 doctors on what you should do about it. 18 of them tell you one thing. 2 of them tell you something else. With your kid’s life in your hands…which group are you going to listen to?
@WildBillforAmerica No they are not Bill. Those 30,000 "scientists" are just signers of a petition. You only need a bachelor degree to count as a "scientist" (since 2008, in the US, over 10 million qualify as a scientist according to their criteria). So you find for example 7,000 engineers on that list. And the court case never materialised (that was almost 4 year ago).
watch?v=Py2XVILHUjQ
So, do you actually have some science to back you up?
@rwland53: Wow, the founder of the weather channel is leading it! And those 30k+ scientists? Really? How many of them are climatologists?
"Climate change is always happening. Its cyclic" true but the sun isn't driving it this time. So what's changed? How about doubling CO2 from human fossil fuel burning?
Of course it is cyclic but why now? I await your explanation
@sol3a1 Why now? Why not? Your scope of vision seems to be limited to a very small time of measurement. What about those people, including climatologists, that were wringing their hands over declining temperatures and the dawn of the next ice age awhile back?
@rwland53 "Why now? Why not? Your scope of vision seems to be limited to a very small time of measurement" actually no, the opposite is true, that would be you and other deniers
"climatologists, that were wringing their hands over declining temperatures" Again another strawman. The Climatologists in the 70s didn't raise fears about Ice Ages, that was the journalists looking for a story
Same thing with Nebraska Man
Perhaps if you're going to say things like that you can name them?
@CollinMaessen What science? Are you going to tell me that the main organization that supported globe warming was a hoax, that when the Earth was warming so was Mars, that the earth hasn't been warming for 10 years now and man made carbon dioxide, Plant air, makes up .5% of green house gasses is all faults?
@wwhit2001 Why would i tell you that something was a hoax? (think you a negative in there somewhere) And I presume you're referring to the IPCC?
Mars: watch?v=BSXgiml5UwM
Warming has stopped: watch?v=xvMmPtEt8dc and watch?v=_PWDFzWt-Ag
On CO2: watch?v=WPA-8A4zf2c
Now please note these are introductions to the subject. They just give a glimpse into the sheer amount of research that has been done and published on these very subjects.
@CollinMaessen Actually, we're commenting on the "actual science" of how to dupe supposedly intelligent people into believing what my Grandfather called "hogwash." I've always been impressed at how little evidence it actually took for people to start freaking out.
Enjoy being wrong about your massive collective fraud. Not that you'll believe anyone or anything to the contrary. That would require thought... as opposed to "knowledge."
@ToxinMortalis I gather you haven't checked my channel, watched my videos and seen the type of sources I cite: almost all of them being primary sources, i.e. the actual research.
I actually read the scientific literature to create the videos I do (hours and untold of hours for the videos I produce). This means I'm doing what you actuase of not doing at all: staying informed and using me head to understand what the literature says.
So I comment in the science, yet you haven't with your comment.
@CollinMaessen The earth in mostly a stable system more CO2 more heat = more plants = less CO2 and even if the increase of Methane over comes that the series you referenced shows that we can counter act this with aerosols. So the idea that we will have devastating global warming and there is nothing we can do about it other than go back to horse and buggy
@wwhit2001 Your logic on the plants is wrong: watch?v=XmcPBKCRplQ
Besides, how can plants absorb that much CO2 if they currently can't do it and our emissions will go up and up.
And where do the series say that about the aerosols? (it's not even a video serie, it's from different youtubers)
Also it seems you don't have any idea of what we can do. Nobody with my position is proposing to go back to horse and buggy neither are the policies proposed (straw man).
@wwhit2001 I didn't reference you to that, that was Treetale. And you can't infer what you are saying from that video. It was explaining a question they were investigating 40 years ago. This later video from Potholer54 makes this blindingly obvious (i.e. you are over estimating the effect) watch?v=EU_AtHkB4Ms
And 5% to 10% compared to what? Emissions? Increase? I have a suspicion how you got this number but I would like to see your calculation or figures for this.
@CollinMaessen watch?v=xvMmPtEt8dc which you reference is #8 in the series that starts with watch?v=52KLGqDSAjo. Total CO2 which is a rapidly renewing gas I said it wrong I only heard it from 1 source shouldn't give it much credence. How much of the total CO2 that is produced is produce by man, do you know?
@wwhit2001 That's not me referencing the video, I would have pointed you directly to it if I had (nor did I say watch the series). Like I said, Treetale directly referenced it.
I'm asking you to back up the number you gave me. It's then not up to me to provide the figures for you. So what was this 1 source you used?
@CollinMaessen What are you trying to say you referenced #8 is a series if videos and when I refer to the 1st in that series you complain? I'm sorry if you refer me to a chapter in a book that book is fair game in the debate. I'm saying that mans effect on the CO2 level is Minimal and thanks to the video series you and Treetale pointed me to, I found that all the warming effects of CO2 and Methane can be countered by Aerosols.
@wwhit2001 My point is that you wrote your original sentence in a way that makes it looks like I directly referenced the video. That's my complaint, not that you yourself are pointing to that video.
Again, the video is referencing something they were investigating 40 years ago. You are using old data. A follow up video from Potholer54 shows that, I linked you to it. Or give me the study/calculations that show you are right.
Also, again, what was this 1 source you used for the 5 - 10% figure?
@CollinMaessen I think is was a caller on a talk show that said they where a meteorologist that is why I said forget about it. The reason I talk about the aerosols fixing the global problem is that the only source I have seen that makes me think that there may be a man made global problem is the same source that gives a solution to it. So If I ignore that video series about aerosols I should also ignore it about global warming.
@wwhit2001 Why the silence for over a month? Your channel shows you were active.
How many times have do I need to repeat myself on the aerosols? What I said, and is distinctly said in the videos you are referencing for your argument, is the following:
You can't infer what you are saying from that video. It was explaining a question they were investigating 40 years ago. This later video from Potholer54 makes this blindingly obvious (i.e. you are over estimating the effect) watch?v=EU_AtHkB4Ms
@CollinMaessen: I fear your reasonable question to wwhit2001 of
"And 5% to 10% compared to what? Emissions? Increase? I have a suspicion how you got this number but I would like to see your calculation or figures for this"
@ToxinMortalis Always interesting to see that people who dismiss the research don't bother backing up their claims why it is a sham. Especially interesting as this would be one hell of a conspiracy if true, thousands of people involved, yet nobody has proof (how many knew of watergate?)
Now what you also don't know is that I also read the papers published by the 'sceptics', or the papers contrarians cite for their positions. The comments sections of my videos is full of evidence for that.
@CollinMaessen Conspiracy claim? Who said it's a conspiracy? It's a sham foisted upon people who want to believe. The science hasn't stood up to peer review and yet nobody seems to care. It's "settled" and that's that. People say "I believe it" and it's suddenly truth. Awesome. The pseudo-scientific version of "Because I said so."
Not that science has ever been wrong before. Wait, it has, but just not in this one case. This is the one exception.
@ToxinMortalis Yes conspiracy, as you said it was a "sham". So in essence it is a lie and for that lie you need millions of fabricated datapoints, thousands of scientists working together, hundreds of organisations, and all telling an identical story. That's a conspiracy.
And yes the science has stood up in peer review, whatever gave you the idea it didn't?
Also have I claimed science is never wrong? So I claim strawman.
@ToxinMortalis "You read the science? You mean the "actual research" provided by the people perpetuating the scam? Oh, -that- science. Right" actually show us the actual "scam"
Oh, you can't as even those hacked emails didn't contain any "smoking gun" but were actually laments on how to show the skeptical public being fed lies from well financed lobbyists from the fossil fuels group
Could you actually provide any evidence about this "alleged" fraud? I know you can't
@sol3a1 "actually laments on how to show the skeptical public being fed lies from well financed lobbyists from the fossil fuels group"
Well, that's one way of looking at people trying to figure out how to get their opinions passed off as science. "Fossil Fuels group?" LOLOLOLOL! CONSPIRACY! EVIL CORPORATIONS ARE GONNA RUIN US ALL!
Yep. That's exactly what it is. Honest scientists fighting the evil oil companies. *sigh*
You don't still believe in the tooth fairy, do you?
I lean to the right but if the liberal left get their way you think America will end up like communist Russia before 1940? There is a word for that..... I think it's called A HUGE SLIPPERY SLOPE.
@Bruce1949919 He's lying about never hearing about the Koch brothers before. @blackstrat1954 I don't know if your lying or not, I can't see your body language.
Everyone should keep in mind that David H. Koch donates to PBS, a "socialist" government program.
Wow Bill, I saw that smile right at the end! You are 100% right on target. I had no idea who they were either. Now, thanks to the liberals I will research, join and support all of their foundations to help preserve America. God Bless America.
I have been doing some research of my own lately. I have become sick by some calling people like Allen West and Herman Cain an Uncle Tom. I have read all his autobiography and if you'll just do a simple Google search on Mr Josiah Henson you too can learn as I have been about the great man that was penned with the name Uncle Tom. I'm still shaking my head in wonder but then nothing that seems to come from the left surprises me anymore.
Liberals are really just like a tick on America's ass and all their followers and voters are even lower than that. True scum of the Earth and I have some inforation in some of my playlist's that shows what liberal idiots do to the world.
At 0:16 he glances to the left before saying he "didn't know who they were". Wild Bill is lying. I have two children and have interviewed enough people to know when someone is lying, yes Bill, that quick glance to the right is a tell tale giveaway.... you're a liar.
@Treetale come up with something more substantial than a quick glance off to the side to level your idiotic appraisal. How about some concrete references to contradict the information?
I never heard of the Koch brothers until the Looney Left began hurling vitriol about them either.....wanna call me a liar too?
@Treetale Please, carefully read what you have written. You say "He glances to the left...........he's lying". Then, you say that his " quick glance to the right" indicates that he's lying. So, tell us Mr. Talltale, which direction of a "quick glance" is the most reliable
indication of a lie? In my experience, when I see someone contradicting themselves within the same short paragraph, I'd say that it's a safe bet that person has their head up their butt!!!!
@Treetale I seen that quick glance too, but if you look close, you can see a squirrel in a ballerina dress whizzing on a treetale, theres no doubt he was smiling about at the end. Which way am I glancing, left or right?
@akahallen Mature. Did you make that story up all by yourself big boy? Just read this and educate yourself on what it is I'm talking about. blifaloo.com/info/lies_eyes.php
@Treetale Yep little man, I did make up that reflection just for you, and having knowledge of investigative/interviewing techniques, it takes more training than checking out some web site that obviously is what you did, and then trying to convince the world your a pro. Who's the liar Hero, Get a life
@WildBillforAmerica I didn't expect anything less than an 'ad hominem' argument from you Bill, it's totally your style. What's next a 'straw-man' or maybe a 'argument from ignorance'.
@WildBillforAmerica First this fool say you Glance to the left, then he say you quick glance to the right ! Man doesnt even have his facts straight and tries to criticize you .Hmmmmmm.
I had never heard of the Koch brothers either until the left started spewing their hate against them! Now thanks to your video, I know more about them and I agree with you!
-_-
melowar78 1 week ago
Fail.
BigDwarren 4 weeks ago
oo yeah bill how do you not realize that the koch brothers have bought each of your favorite politicians out... how do you not realize that these guys represent vulture capitalism as opposed to venture capitalism, to use newts words. lets face it... the only reason you claim to support the koch brothers is to upset liberals. you dont even care about their record. unfortunately for you... you fall victim to the mentality that your enemy's enemies are your friends.. til the koch bros screw you too
crankycactus 1 month ago
@crankycactus Since you have such a strong opinion on this and other subjects, why don't you start your own blog/vlog?
jymstone3 1 month ago
@jymstone3 true... i dont really have the time... all of the information i have was covered by several news organizations...btw it is not an opinion, but a fact, that the koch brothers have bought several congressional bills and countless politicians...
crankycactus 1 month ago
@crankycactus Thanks for your prompt reply. Bill and I started this last year because we wanted to make a difference in a positive way and have fun doing it. You have opinions, go out and try it out to see if there is a market for your ideas. If not, back to the drawing board. Frankly we don't have time either! WE MAKE IT!!!
jymstone3 1 month ago
@jymstone3 i dont have a drawing board... i am just a loud mouthed spectator.. i do certainly appreciate your positive sentiment... i will, however, not discontinue my criticism of bill... he has many unsubstantiated arguments.... and not to mention, is a big govt hypocrite...
crankycactus 1 month ago
@crankycactus Funny thing about the claim that the Koch brothers are succesful businessmen is that it was their father's business. They wouldn't have shit, including Koch Industries, if they weren't lucky enough to have inherited it.
njanovic1980 2 weeks ago
@njanovic1980 not even surprised..
crankycactus 2 weeks ago
@crankycactus do you hate all billionaires or just the ones that don't support your Liberal Progressive messiah Barry?
WesOrion 1 week ago
@WesOrion i never said i hate billionaires... i hate that the koch bros fund misinformation... i hate that they buy politicians... i hate that they are keeping the rest of us down... barry is no where near a liberal messiah.. he is a centerist... you couldnt even imagine the things a real liberal progressive would do...
crankycactus 1 week ago
@crankycactus LOL, why so ignorant? Why you hate Koch brothers so much is the fact that maybe they fund truth. The misinformation is bought and paid for by the billionaires that control the MSM, Media Matters and Barry. You are just another scarred little commie freeloading liberal bitch that is about to see your Messiah fall and fall hard.
WesOrion 1 week ago
@WesOrion wow... zing... you got me... all you did was provide solid facts and a substantive rebutal... you didnt even have to use an ad hominem attack... i can see that you have figured out how to use language that really gets your point across... i understand where you are coming from... and yes i admit that you were right about me hating billionaires.. its not that i just dont want them to buy my government... i just hate them cause their rich...
crankycactus 1 week ago
@crankycactus if Barry is so centrist, then I must be a billionaire too.
WesOrion 1 week ago
@WesOrion and yes of course i also admit that he could not be a centerist after extending the bush tax cuts, prolonging the troops stay in the middle east, compromising on health care, tightening up on the drug war, bluffing about closing guantanimo,or signing the defense autorization act... you got me
crankycactus 1 week ago
@crankycactus why don't you pull that cactus out of your hind quarters, maybe you won't be so cranky? Look, if you are going to talk smart and act naive all at the same time and not see what Barry is truly doing, then you are the problem that has infected this Republic. Barry doubled the spending that Bush has done in only 3 years as to Bush's 2 FULL terms. His bailouts have done nothing, but he claims TARP as having worked, which was Bush's baby signed into law.
WesOrion 1 week ago
@crankycactus it does not take a centrist to extend, prolong or strengthen anything Bush did. Healthcare was not compromised, it was rammed up our asses. If you call keeping open borders as tightening up on the drug war, you need to take a revisited look at it. The NDAA is worse than the Patriot Act, now anybody that Barry don't like can be removed with impunity. Again, your failure to actually see whom Barry truly is.
WesOrion 1 week ago
@crankycactus They donate to conservative causes....read that as "good causes", the exact opposite of liberalism....we need more people like the Koch brothers to fight against the evil of the left.....seriously, I thank God for these guys....they are a gift.
WildBillforAmerica 1 week ago
god is fake and country is vacuous.... you live a very shallow and petty existence...
crankycactus 1 month ago
@crankycactus Rude Idiot
The1deemann 1 month ago
Bravo Bill........keep it up!!!
whifty1 2 months ago 2
Well stated thank you so much keep the great videos coming so we can cure the cancer called obama
2hatelibs1 2 months ago
and government control. Again, I'll ask what trendy changes you've made to make the environment better. Tell me what solutions you have come up with, as you sip your latte, to a natural weather fluctuation that you can not possibly control?
pugilist66 2 months ago
@sol3a1, I don't have to back up anything and I backed down from nothing. There is no use arguing with a hysterical person whose life is consumed with the religion of global warming. It would get me nowhere and I have far better things to do lol. Live your life as you choose, Chicken Little, and I'll live mine. The point is that your religion infringes on my rights to live a peaceful prosperous life unbridled from your skewed 'science.'
pugilist66 2 months ago
@sol3a1, it must have been the same type of 'religious wackos' that believe that normal climate fluctuation is caused by nasty, evil humans. I wonder what trendy steps you have taken to 'save' the environment. Actually, since you choose to live your life in hysteria, you better start worrying about super volcanoes, asteroids and the like- they're much more likely to get you before 'global warming' does lol
pugilist66 2 months ago
@pugilist66 "it must have been the same type of 'religious wackos' that believe that normal climate fluctuation is caused by nasty, evil humans" not "nasty evil humans" as for a long time, we didn't know what we were doing. Now we do
But I like how you changed from denying as you'll have to backup what you say than actually back up your claim there's not AWG
Care to back up the claims you made or are you going to slink out and ignore it? My vote, you'll claim victory and ignore it
sol3a1 2 months ago
Don't forget that for thousands of years, 'scientists' thought that the world was flat lol. Every generation thinks that they have all the answers and the fact is that we don't. So, quit grabbing your heads and running around scared that the world is gonna end. Chill out, embrace liberty and quit looking to the government to quell all your fears- real or imagined lol.
pugilist66 2 months ago
@pugilist66 "Don't forget that for thousands of years, 'scientists' thought that the world was flat lol" nope that was religious wackos posing as wise men. Actual scientists, such as the Greeks, knew the Earth was round
Religious Dogma from the buy-bull kept Western Civ in the Dark ages, Sun goes around the Earth, etc
"So, quit grabbing your heads and running around scared that the world is gonna end" nope the world will go on, with or without humans
Want to risk you kids? I don't
sol3a1 2 months ago
The 'global warming' crowd have been caught again and again falsifying data, covering up data, and promulgating lie after lie to support the religious dogma (for that's exactly what it is) of 'global warming.' Most of their solutions are just as bad, or worse, for the environment that they claim to cherish lol. Keep running around exclaiming that the sky is falling and paying a world government for the privilege of using oxygen and expelling evil carbon dioxide if you wish, but I for one am not.
pugilist66 2 months ago
@txgp17 You seem to have missed the 8 investigations into those e-mails and which found no scientific problems. There's nothing in those e-mails: bit. ly/w1e0aH
And so what about Gore? He's a politician, even if I grant you that he made those mistakes (btw you are misrepresenting the court ruling bit. ly/yAQHof), how does a mistake by a non-scientist in any way invalidate research in the scientific literature?
CollinMaessen 2 months ago
Global warming denialists are starting to sound a lot like evolution denialists. You deny that which is hard for you to understand, or that which is inconvenient for your other beliefs. In any case you may have been able to convince your followers on here, but you simply cannot expect to convince a thinking person with your evidence lacking, infantile reasoning. Thanks.
imigrant00 2 months ago
@imigrant00 I'm beginning to believe in man made global warming but the same Video series that made me believe that man made global warming might be true, showed that man made global warming can be countered, just by removing the ban on Aerosols.
wwhit2001 2 months ago
@wwhit2001
I don't know the mechanism behind how Aerosols work. But I think that if the solution was this simple it would have been proposed by now. I don't think there is a global conspiracy hiding the helpful effects of aerosol and I could be wrong, but I don't see why it wouldn't have been proposed as a solution by now...
imigrant00 2 months ago
@imigrant00 check out the series starting with watch?v=52KLGqDSAjo. Tell me if you find anything that shows that I'm wrong. Just to let you know if you except it as truth, it does a really good job of proving and explaining man made Global warming.
wwhit2001 2 months ago
@wwhit2001 This will be the third time I'm telling you this, but you can't infer what you are saying from that video. It was explaining a question they were investigating 40 years ago. This later video from Potholer54 makes this blindingly obvious (i.e. you are over estimating the effect) watch?v=EU_AtHkB4Ms
Here is an actual breakdown of the warming we have seen and what has contributed and 'mitigated': bit. ly/xAInif
So any calculations/papers that confirm your claim?
CollinMaessen 2 months ago
@txgp17 "I'm sure you've heard of Climategate, where (alleged) scientists manipulated data to support their positions" then you must've read how that was not what the hackers and backers of denial thought it would be don't you?
"Most of these AGW scientists depend this hoax to pay their salaries" really? Name one and then name a "scientist" who says AGW is not real and I'll show you someone who gets funding from fossil fuel lobby
"at least 11 material falsehoods" really? Which ones?
sol3a1 2 months ago
Therefore anymore proof of global warming only means that the band on Aerosols needs to be removed quicker.
wwhit2001 2 months ago
The comment from the climate denialists of "Climate change is always happening. Its cyclic" is true but what they don't seem to know is why that happens
So Climate Change deniers, please share your wisdom and I'm sure deep knowledge on the subject of climatology, why is the warming occurring now?
Thanks
sol3a1 2 months ago
Comment removed
wwhit2001 2 months ago
How tell a real christian Luke 18:22 and if they are not doing this they do not belong in this Christian State . Can you name any Millionaire that do this ???
parsonman05 2 months ago
Comment removed
parsonman05 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@painterQjensen You support the side that is taxing us to death, giving all our tax money away in interest payments, trying to control everything we do say or eat, has majority control of the news, entertainment, education and politicians and you call us sheep?
wwhit2001 2 months ago
wildbill 4 american is clearly a moron that lives outside the borders of reason and sanity, ergo waste of time 2 watch and talk to, happy weekend human sheep :)
painterQjensen 2 months ago
Comment removed
wwhit2001 2 months ago
day is proven wrong. Thank you now i know all that is needed to stop global warming is to remove the band on aerosols.
wwhit2001 2 months ago
High on Kock. I bet you are Bill,
nzobriens 2 months ago
@txgp17 So that is your response when I point out a problems in the argumentation of Bill? Care to back this statement up?
(btw, did you check my channel? as you would have noticed I produce videos on this global warming and i reference primary sources, i.e. research)
CollinMaessen 2 months ago
Ah, yes. I see fascism is alive and well.
PlutoPowered 2 months ago
Very true Bill. Thank you for telling the truth once again!!!! Even though half the listeners have deaf ears.......Liberals!!!!
ironcitydevildog 2 months ago
@Treetale Thank you now I know to stop globule warming all you need is aerosols and all you need to stop globule cooling is carbon dioxides. No worries, we can keep control of the weather. Thanks again Treetale.
wwhit2001 2 months ago
keep up the Good work Bill. USA USA USA USA
dewerbylhserf 2 months ago
When you global warmers start getting on the people that have wasted trillions of dollars on sham Ideas that don't stop damaging the ecology(electric cars run on coal you idiots) then and only then will you make any points.
billty1 2 months ago
As I follow comments here, I am realizing that many people do not like or want the truth !
Keep up the good work WildBillfor America.
empie45 2 months ago
I love the Koch brothers and their father! The left had to find a scape goat to put on to the conservative side because of how much George Soros was being exposed. BTW Soros made $8 BILLION in 2011 with the inside info he got from this administration. Those damn millionares and billionaires.
dynamitemike65 2 months ago
Global warming is a sham.Takes what little mind that you young ones have left and will make you slaves,Global warming =Agenda 21= NWO. It's your freedoms you are giving up to this new religion.
billty1 2 months ago
Rule of thumb: Liberals=miserable souls who can't stand to see happiness, unless they can steal from others, and have it for FREEEEEE! When they say it is, it is not; when they say it is not, it is. Easy to remember. They are dishonest hucksters. And... We ALWAYS hear about the "evil rich," and the "evil corporations." What about the evil, rich politicians and their cohorts, the bureaucratic masses of control freaks? What about the "evil government?" THE GOVERNMENT IS NOT THE NATION. WE ARE.
soco13466 2 months ago
Thanks a whole heap of gratitude Bill, My own Sen Testor (D) (the famous swing vote for Obamacare) kept sending me, a mean ole conservative, wishes for campaign support to fight the mean ole Koch Bros lies about him. Well, I didn't know who the mean ole Koch Bros were, but I didn't figure they could be all bad, now thanks to you, I do. I don't mind being compared to them, heck, somewhere after Adam and Eve, I might even be related to them. Ha
akahallen 2 months ago
Amen. I'm with you Bill. You should read the article by Timothy Sandefur of the Pacific Legal Foundation, called Compliance–or Else, The EPA’s compliance order regime creates a Hobson’s choice. It's on the Cato.org website. What those poor people are going through is enough to make anyone a Conservative.
Filmore87458 2 months ago
lol say it loud, what a compliment to be compared to such men, congratulations, and they thought it was in insult :)
MarinePrepper 2 months ago
Well said.
GodFamilyCountryCorp 2 months ago
It's like me and Soros. The more the conservatives hate on him the more I like him.
garbagemanlb 2 months ago
@garbagemanlb evil does as evil do. Foolish statement.
GodFamilyCountryCorp 2 months ago
Hello Bill, I can't say that I've ever heard of the Koch brothers before now. If they are using their fortunes to help protect American freedoms from the leftist vultures, I'd say that they are heros. Having never heard of them, I reserve judgement pending further research. I do however, enjoy a hearty laugh whenever liberals trip over themselves while attacking a patriot and unwittingly show their enemies to be the REAL good guys!
wademech 2 months ago
@wademech No you wouldn't say they are "heros". You would say they are heroes, correct?
GenericFurfag 2 months ago
If you say "climate change hoax" you are displaying for all to see how little you know about the actual science.
CollinMaessen 2 months ago
@CollinMaessen 30,000 scientists are suing A Gore over his "climate change hoax".....sorry Collin....your little money making scheme is being exposed.
WildBillforAmerica 2 months ago 3
@WildBillforAmerica 30,000 really? Source please
karnak472 2 months ago 6
@karnak472 He's referencing the OISM petition project. If you scroll down you'll find a comment from me pointing out some issues with this claim.
Or you could go to this video for the full story: watch?v=Py2XVILHUjQ
CollinMaessen 2 months ago
@WildBillforAmerica Senator Inhofe had a list of 400 scientists who claimed global warming was a hoax. Let’s take a look at who these scientists were:
Inhofe’s list includes 413 people. (Score one Inhofe; the math holds up.)
84 have either taken money from, or are connected to, fossil fuel industries, or think tanks started by those industries.
49 are retired
44 are television weathermen
20 are economists
70 have no apparent expertise in climate science
Treetale 2 months ago
@WildBillforAmerica Here is a good analogy. Your kid has cancer. You go see 20 doctors on what you should do about it. 18 of them tell you one thing. 2 of them tell you something else. With your kid’s life in your hands…which group are you going to listen to?
Treetale 2 months ago
@WildBillforAmerica
didn't know the Koch brothers existed till now.
thanks.
climate change. hoax it is.
and Bill, could you really tell us how you feel about the left?
well done..
stick48668 2 months ago
@WildBillforAmerica No they are not Bill. Those 30,000 "scientists" are just signers of a petition. You only need a bachelor degree to count as a "scientist" (since 2008, in the US, over 10 million qualify as a scientist according to their criteria). So you find for example 7,000 engineers on that list. And the court case never materialised (that was almost 4 year ago).
watch?v=Py2XVILHUjQ
So, do you actually have some science to back you up?
CollinMaessen 2 months ago
@WildBillforAmerica
No they're not.
PlutoPowered 2 months ago
@WildBillforAmerica "30,000 scientists are suing A Gore over his 'climate change hoax'" care to back that up?
Name a single "scientist" that doesn't get a research grant from the fossil fuel lobby that think climate change isn't happening
sol3a1 2 months ago
@sol3a1 Go to you tube and search "Al Gore sued by over 30.000 Scientists "
rwland53 2 months ago
@rwland53: Wow, the founder of the weather channel is leading it! And those 30k+ scientists? Really? How many of them are climatologists?
"Climate change is always happening. Its cyclic" true but the sun isn't driving it this time. So what's changed? How about doubling CO2 from human fossil fuel burning?
Of course it is cyclic but why now? I await your explanation
sol3a1 2 months ago
@sol3a1 Why now? Why not? Your scope of vision seems to be limited to a very small time of measurement. What about those people, including climatologists, that were wringing their hands over declining temperatures and the dawn of the next ice age awhile back?
rwland53 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@rwland53 "Why now? Why not? Your scope of vision seems to be limited to a very small time of measurement" actually no, the opposite is true, that would be you and other deniers
"climatologists, that were wringing their hands over declining temperatures" Again another strawman. The Climatologists in the 70s didn't raise fears about Ice Ages, that was the journalists looking for a story
Same thing with Nebraska Man
Perhaps if you're going to say things like that you can name them?
sol3a1 2 months ago
@sol3a1 Google "scientist against global warming" for more than one. Climate change is always happening. Its cyclic.
rwland53 2 months ago
@WildBillforAmerica
No they're not.
PlutoPowered 2 months ago
@WildBillforAmerica karnak472 said, "Source please!" What 30,000 scientists?
VvDOPAMEANvV 2 months ago
@WildBillforAmerica "30,000 scientists are suing A Gore" again WBFA, let's see these names. Also when was this suit brought? What? It hasn't yet?
Do you ever speak with facts or talking pioints from Fox News?
sol3a1 2 months ago
@sol3a1 Wild Bill didn't say anything about 30,000 anything in this video. What are you? A stalker?
jymstone3 2 months ago
@CollinMaessen What science? Are you going to tell me that the main organization that supported globe warming was a hoax, that when the Earth was warming so was Mars, that the earth hasn't been warming for 10 years now and man made carbon dioxide, Plant air, makes up .5% of green house gasses is all faults?
wwhit2001 2 months ago
@wwhit2001 This science!! /watch?v=52KLGqDSAjo&feature=results_main&playnext=1&list=PLF69B8220D7AF4285
Treetale 2 months ago
@wwhit2001 Why would i tell you that something was a hoax? (think you a negative in there somewhere) And I presume you're referring to the IPCC?
Mars: watch?v=BSXgiml5UwM
Warming has stopped: watch?v=xvMmPtEt8dc and watch?v=_PWDFzWt-Ag
On CO2: watch?v=WPA-8A4zf2c
Now please note these are introductions to the subject. They just give a glimpse into the sheer amount of research that has been done and published on these very subjects.
CollinMaessen 2 months ago
@CollinMaessen Actually, we're commenting on the "actual science" of how to dupe supposedly intelligent people into believing what my Grandfather called "hogwash." I've always been impressed at how little evidence it actually took for people to start freaking out.
Enjoy being wrong about your massive collective fraud. Not that you'll believe anyone or anything to the contrary. That would require thought... as opposed to "knowledge."
ToxinMortalis 2 months ago
@ToxinMortalis I gather you haven't checked my channel, watched my videos and seen the type of sources I cite: almost all of them being primary sources, i.e. the actual research.
I actually read the scientific literature to create the videos I do (hours and untold of hours for the videos I produce). This means I'm doing what you actuase of not doing at all: staying informed and using me head to understand what the literature says.
So I comment in the science, yet you haven't with your comment.
CollinMaessen 2 months ago
@CollinMaessen The earth in mostly a stable system more CO2 more heat = more plants = less CO2 and even if the increase of Methane over comes that the series you referenced shows that we can counter act this with aerosols. So the idea that we will have devastating global warming and there is nothing we can do about it other than go back to horse and buggy
wwhit2001 2 months ago
@wwhit2001 Your logic on the plants is wrong: watch?v=XmcPBKCRplQ
Besides, how can plants absorb that much CO2 if they currently can't do it and our emissions will go up and up.
And where do the series say that about the aerosols? (it's not even a video serie, it's from different youtubers)
Also it seems you don't have any idea of what we can do. Nobody with my position is proposing to go back to horse and buggy neither are the policies proposed (straw man).
CollinMaessen 2 months ago
@CollinMaessen Check out watch?v=52KLGqDSAjo the first in the series of videos you referred me to.
wwhit2001 2 months ago
@CollinMaessen Also Man only makes 5 to 10% of the carbon dioxide.
wwhit2001 2 months ago
@wwhit2001 I didn't reference you to that, that was Treetale. And you can't infer what you are saying from that video. It was explaining a question they were investigating 40 years ago. This later video from Potholer54 makes this blindingly obvious (i.e. you are over estimating the effect) watch?v=EU_AtHkB4Ms
And 5% to 10% compared to what? Emissions? Increase? I have a suspicion how you got this number but I would like to see your calculation or figures for this.
CollinMaessen 2 months ago
@CollinMaessen watch?v=xvMmPtEt8dc which you reference is #8 in the series that starts with watch?v=52KLGqDSAjo. Total CO2 which is a rapidly renewing gas I said it wrong I only heard it from 1 source shouldn't give it much credence. How much of the total CO2 that is produced is produce by man, do you know?
wwhit2001 2 months ago
@wwhit2001 That's not me referencing the video, I would have pointed you directly to it if I had (nor did I say watch the series). Like I said, Treetale directly referenced it.
I'm asking you to back up the number you gave me. It's then not up to me to provide the figures for you. So what was this 1 source you used?
CollinMaessen 2 months ago
@CollinMaessen What are you trying to say you referenced #8 is a series if videos and when I refer to the 1st in that series you complain? I'm sorry if you refer me to a chapter in a book that book is fair game in the debate. I'm saying that mans effect on the CO2 level is Minimal and thanks to the video series you and Treetale pointed me to, I found that all the warming effects of CO2 and Methane can be countered by Aerosols.
wwhit2001 2 months ago
@wwhit2001 My point is that you wrote your original sentence in a way that makes it looks like I directly referenced the video. That's my complaint, not that you yourself are pointing to that video.
Again, the video is referencing something they were investigating 40 years ago. You are using old data. A follow up video from Potholer54 shows that, I linked you to it. Or give me the study/calculations that show you are right.
Also, again, what was this 1 source you used for the 5 - 10% figure?
CollinMaessen 2 months ago
@CollinMaessen I think is was a caller on a talk show that said they where a meteorologist that is why I said forget about it. The reason I talk about the aerosols fixing the global problem is that the only source I have seen that makes me think that there may be a man made global problem is the same source that gives a solution to it. So If I ignore that video series about aerosols I should also ignore it about global warming.
wwhit2001 4 weeks ago
@wwhit2001 Why the silence for over a month? Your channel shows you were active.
How many times have do I need to repeat myself on the aerosols? What I said, and is distinctly said in the videos you are referencing for your argument, is the following:
You can't infer what you are saying from that video. It was explaining a question they were investigating 40 years ago. This later video from Potholer54 makes this blindingly obvious (i.e. you are over estimating the effect) watch?v=EU_AtHkB4Ms
CollinMaessen 4 weeks ago
@CollinMaessen: I fear your reasonable question to wwhit2001 of
"And 5% to 10% compared to what? Emissions? Increase? I have a suspicion how you got this number but I would like to see your calculation or figures for this"
will require a doctor and a flashlight
sol3a1 2 months ago
@CollinMaessen You read the science? You mean the "actual research" provided by the people perpetuating the scam? Oh, -that- science. Right.
If that's what you read, nothing will change your mind, especially not random comments from someone on youtube. I wish you luck in your future.
Oh, before I go, do you want to buy a bridge? It's only slightly used and you seem like someone who could make use it.
ToxinMortalis 2 months ago
@ToxinMortalis Always interesting to see that people who dismiss the research don't bother backing up their claims why it is a sham. Especially interesting as this would be one hell of a conspiracy if true, thousands of people involved, yet nobody has proof (how many knew of watergate?)
Now what you also don't know is that I also read the papers published by the 'sceptics', or the papers contrarians cite for their positions. The comments sections of my videos is full of evidence for that.
CollinMaessen 2 months ago
@CollinMaessen Conspiracy claim? Who said it's a conspiracy? It's a sham foisted upon people who want to believe. The science hasn't stood up to peer review and yet nobody seems to care. It's "settled" and that's that. People say "I believe it" and it's suddenly truth. Awesome. The pseudo-scientific version of "Because I said so."
Not that science has ever been wrong before. Wait, it has, but just not in this one case. This is the one exception.
ToxinMortalis 2 months ago
@ToxinMortalis Yes conspiracy, as you said it was a "sham". So in essence it is a lie and for that lie you need millions of fabricated datapoints, thousands of scientists working together, hundreds of organisations, and all telling an identical story. That's a conspiracy.
And yes the science has stood up in peer review, whatever gave you the idea it didn't?
Also have I claimed science is never wrong? So I claim strawman.
CollinMaessen 2 months ago
@ToxinMortalis "You read the science? You mean the "actual research" provided by the people perpetuating the scam? Oh, -that- science. Right" actually show us the actual "scam"
Oh, you can't as even those hacked emails didn't contain any "smoking gun" but were actually laments on how to show the skeptical public being fed lies from well financed lobbyists from the fossil fuels group
Could you actually provide any evidence about this "alleged" fraud? I know you can't
sol3a1 2 months ago
@sol3a1 "actually laments on how to show the skeptical public being fed lies from well financed lobbyists from the fossil fuels group"
Well, that's one way of looking at people trying to figure out how to get their opinions passed off as science. "Fossil Fuels group?" LOLOLOLOL! CONSPIRACY! EVIL CORPORATIONS ARE GONNA RUIN US ALL!
Yep. That's exactly what it is. Honest scientists fighting the evil oil companies. *sigh*
You don't still believe in the tooth fairy, do you?
ToxinMortalis 2 months ago
Comment removed
wwhit2001 2 months ago
Comment removed
wwhit2001 2 months ago
I lean to the right but if the liberal left get their way you think America will end up like communist Russia before 1940? There is a word for that..... I think it's called A HUGE SLIPPERY SLOPE.
GenericFurfag 2 months ago
Ewww...be careful Winter. I'm a Paul supporter. Goes to show that not all Paul supporters are crazy...just most of us.
;-)
bjeweled21 2 months ago
lol Paul supporters and Obama supporters do not like people that work and /or have money.
Winterfairy777 2 months ago
Gotta love it,Bill.I can't wait for the day when I can shake Your hand,and Thank You
kindly for all that You do.
blkhed 2 months ago
@Bruce1949919 He's lying about never hearing about the Koch brothers before. @blackstrat1954 I don't know if your lying or not, I can't see your body language.
Everyone should keep in mind that David H. Koch donates to PBS, a "socialist" government program.
Treetale 2 months ago
I admire the Koch brothers. Hard working, level headed conservatives. It just makes the left crazy. teehee
bjeweled21 2 months ago
@bjeweled21 that you can bet on!
Winterfairy777 2 months ago
These videos are great. I've forwarded the link on to all my friends. Keep it up and we'll keep on fighting the good fight. Amen brother.
sageladymj 2 months ago
Wow Bill, I saw that smile right at the end! You are 100% right on target. I had no idea who they were either. Now, thanks to the liberals I will research, join and support all of their foundations to help preserve America. God Bless America.
bobfox321 2 months ago
So conservatism was founded by the koch brothers? Wow they must have been around for over 200 years.
MutimirRX 2 months ago
Bill,
I have been doing some research of my own lately. I have become sick by some calling people like Allen West and Herman Cain an Uncle Tom. I have read all his autobiography and if you'll just do a simple Google search on Mr Josiah Henson you too can learn as I have been about the great man that was penned with the name Uncle Tom. I'm still shaking my head in wonder but then nothing that seems to come from the left surprises me anymore.
mlwise24 2 months ago 2
@mlwise24 I made a video about "Uncle Tom"....you might like it....the left has it completely wrong.
WildBillforAmerica 2 months ago
Well said, Sir! Well said! I still don't know much about the Koch brothers, but I will be doing my own research.
armyduude 2 months ago
Liberals are really just like a tick on America's ass and all their followers and voters are even lower than that. True scum of the Earth and I have some inforation in some of my playlist's that shows what liberal idiots do to the world.
MrREAPER2014 2 months ago
At 0:16 he glances to the left before saying he "didn't know who they were". Wild Bill is lying. I have two children and have interviewed enough people to know when someone is lying, yes Bill, that quick glance to the right is a tell tale giveaway.... you're a liar.
Treetale 2 months ago
@Treetale come up with something more substantial than a quick glance off to the side to level your idiotic appraisal. How about some concrete references to contradict the information?
I never heard of the Koch brothers until the Looney Left began hurling vitriol about them either.....wanna call me a liar too?
blackstrat1954 2 months ago
@Treetale What is Wild Bill lying about genius?
Bruce1949919 2 months ago 3
@Treetale Please, carefully read what you have written. You say "He glances to the left...........he's lying". Then, you say that his " quick glance to the right" indicates that he's lying. So, tell us Mr. Talltale, which direction of a "quick glance" is the most reliable
indication of a lie? In my experience, when I see someone contradicting themselves within the same short paragraph, I'd say that it's a safe bet that person has their head up their butt!!!!
wademech 2 months ago
@wademech Sorry, let me clarify. It's my left and his right. It's not a contradiction but a different frame of reference.
Treetale 2 months ago
@Treetale I seen that quick glance too, but if you look close, you can see a squirrel in a ballerina dress whizzing on a treetale, theres no doubt he was smiling about at the end. Which way am I glancing, left or right?
akahallen 2 months ago
@akahallen Mature. Did you make that story up all by yourself big boy? Just read this and educate yourself on what it is I'm talking about. blifaloo.com/info/lies_eyes.php
Treetale 2 months ago
@Treetale Yep little man, I did make up that reflection just for you, and having knowledge of investigative/interviewing techniques, it takes more training than checking out some web site that obviously is what you did, and then trying to convince the world your a pro. Who's the liar Hero, Get a life
akahallen 2 months ago
@Treetale and you believe some really goofy things....bet your children think you are nuts too.
WildBillforAmerica 2 months ago
@WildBillforAmerica So for all of the people who actually care about the truth (and like science) blifaloo.com/info/lies_eyes.php
Treetale 2 months ago
@WildBillforAmerica I didn't expect anything less than an 'ad hominem' argument from you Bill, it's totally your style. What's next a 'straw-man' or maybe a 'argument from ignorance'.
Treetale 2 months ago
@WildBillforAmerica First this fool say you Glance to the left, then he say you quick glance to the right ! Man doesnt even have his facts straight and tries to criticize you .Hmmmmmm.
paully069 2 months ago
I had never heard of the Koch brothers either until the left started spewing their hate against them! Now thanks to your video, I know more about them and I agree with you!
TheSugarcube2 2 months ago 6
Nice Job Bill
bluetunder40 2 months ago 6
I KNEW IT! Anyone who could make Rachel MadCOW'S head spin 360 degrees HAS to be a GOOD loyal American!
tjbollman1 2 months ago 2
@tjbollman1 seriously, you are correct!@
mycaddigo 2 months ago 2
@mycaddigo Well thanks! Really, if anyone really payed attention to Madcow they would see how twisted her thinking is....its Bad!
tjbollman1 2 months ago
@tjbollman1 i watched her a year ago for the first time and i came to the same thoughts as you.
mycaddigo 2 months ago