You're all idiots. Haven't you ever gone to a live show and had the band do their own cover of it special that night?? That's the case with this song..hence why you won't find it on any studio album. They weren't trying to put out some Royksopp rendition of it it was just a quirk for the audience at the end of the show. Don't be so damn critical the album was just recorded from a live show.
the reason is cause queens of the stone age are one of my favourite bands besides foo fighters and you can't quite beat the original so harry thats why you communist anyone from cuba i am sorry if i caused any affence
Sounds like josh hommme but the hi pitched noise at the beggining is screwed up this cover is pretty bad but I hate the song happy up here but love the original of this song it proves that rock is the greatest type of music and cannot be coverd by techno
Royksopp stuck too closely to the original. They would have really needed to tweek this song a lot to get it to work with their style. I feel like Simon saying it, but I'm disappointed.
I like Røyksopp, and they are from my small hometown, but this sounds fuck up ,and they kind of ruin the original. I love Queens of the stoneage.. their cover gives me a headache :/
Wtf? nah they should have written their own song, Its to techno/electric style to even be called a cover of Queens Of The Stone Age. Re-interpretation? No shit. :P
usually with covers you can compare, but you are wrong to compare this one, its apples and oranges, royksopp made this an entirely new song.. and i think they actually called it a re-interpretation
basically both songs are zomg! great in their own ways...
WHAT?! LOL, This is awesome, They picked a good song to cover too.
Mrshutter 1 year ago
It still succeeds to evoke the energy of the original, but with a different electro flavor. Good cover. Fuck you haters.
321midnight 1 year ago 3
Nuts!
cazandnaoise 1 year ago
You're all idiots. Haven't you ever gone to a live show and had the band do their own cover of it special that night?? That's the case with this song..hence why you won't find it on any studio album. They weren't trying to put out some Royksopp rendition of it it was just a quirk for the audience at the end of the show. Don't be so damn critical the album was just recorded from a live show.
MrDelegateZERO 1 year ago
@MrDelegateZERO I guess no one understands the concept of "tribute"
robotrock42 1 year ago
the reason is cause queens of the stone age are one of my favourite bands besides foo fighters and you can't quite beat the original so harry thats why you communist anyone from cuba i am sorry if i caused any affence
fartyparty22 1 year ago
the person that i kinda share this channel with dont like royksopp but i do ;)
OfficialSwiftyShift 1 year ago
Sounds like josh hommme but the hi pitched noise at the beggining is screwed up this cover is pretty bad but I hate the song happy up here but love the original of this song it proves that rock is the greatest type of music and cannot be coverd by techno
fartyparty22 1 year ago
@fartyparty22 Royksopp aint techno
Chemie89 11 months ago
@Chemie89 they're not?
oilfighter21 11 months ago
@oilfighter21 Course they ain't. Electronica yes, dance yes, ambience yes, acoustica yes......techno....no
Chemie89 11 months ago
Royksopp stuck too closely to the original. They would have really needed to tweek this song a lot to get it to work with their style. I feel like Simon saying it, but I'm disappointed.
EverythingZen14 2 years ago
@EverythingZen14 Nah totally disagree, it was for a live show...Royksopp don't have a set sound. It works!
Chemie89 11 months ago
i don't like this cover
escapist29 2 years ago
I like Røyksopp, and they are from my small hometown, but this sounds fuck up ,and they kind of ruin the original. I love Queens of the stoneage.. their cover gives me a headache :/
omglolffs 2 years ago
Wtf? nah they should have written their own song, Its to techno/electric style to even be called a cover of Queens Of The Stone Age. Re-interpretation? No shit. :P
Doctor811 2 years ago
awesome!
norskedrit 2 years ago
Don't get me wrong, I thing this sounds good, but its like it doesn't know what it wants to be.
The original imo is so much better because this version sounds too edited and lacks the bass to give the song that certain quality.
PartTimeGuitarist 2 years ago
!!!
00skim 2 years ago
Qtsa? Royksopp?
This is gold!
aqidon 2 years ago 3
Who Cover?
ededmax 2 years ago
This is the sexy Juice!
MonkeyChillcup 3 years ago
sounds like a swedish josh homme singin it
YeungyBassMasta 3 years ago
Hehe, Røyksopp is Norwegian tho.
omglolffs 2 years ago
i love you royksopp! damn good music
12171053 3 years ago 3
Gotta Love It!!!
RakiuraHerzhoff 3 years ago
Rly good, but i love Queens and i always will so this isnt better then they orginal :)
Rbbiiz 3 years ago 8
usually with covers you can compare, but you are wrong to compare this one, its apples and oranges, royksopp made this an entirely new song.. and i think they actually called it a re-interpretation
basically both songs are zomg! great in their own ways...
luker9134 2 years ago 3
totally agree :)
Mart1jn 2 years ago
beautiful voice...love it...
eple0 3 years ago
who sings it? in the röyksopp version...?
eple0 3 years ago 2
perty sweet.
tyler112493 3 years ago 2
slick
Mart1jn 3 years ago
is dat sum queens of the stone age?
asako23 3 years ago 8
yeah
Qotsafin 3 years ago
@asako23 is that some idiot that should learn to spell?
oilfighter21 1 year ago
wow, the go team supported royksopp once upon a time. what a gig that'd have been....
Ralphmortimerroome 3 years ago
great song
fuzzyshan 3 years ago
yeah i am the first wiewer:) nice song...thanks for the add...
islenskavikingur 3 years ago
yeah i am the first wiewer:)good song...thanks for the add...
islenskavikingur 3 years ago