The Islamic scholars thoroughly exceeded Grecian output in the exact Sciences as well as in religion and philosophy. (1, H.R Turner, Science in Medieval Islam. 2, George Sarton, Introduction to the History of Science. 3, J. Bernal, Science in History. 4, Carra De Vaux, The Philosophers of Islam. 5, Thomas Goldstein, Dawn of Modern Science. 6, Dictionary of Scientific Biography.
Let me give you a little advice: this kind of phenomenon are sent or allowed by God, Try to expose your opinion and the same time prevent algid discussions. Look around, look around.
If we assume that natural laws are absolute, then we must assume that our thoughts are determined by natural laws, therefore, the will doesn't exist?!?!?!?. The self-conscious universal environment is called God, and Yes, God is able to read our mind. Learn something about theology, please.
God does as he pleases, don't you understand? I'm tired of the "Evil" God argument, this is just a red herring for not accepting God's dictates and continue their sinful lives just as Pat says - in a cynical way - at the end. In any case, death is bad for humans but not bad from God's perspective specially when pagan babies in the Old Testament are saved from eternal damnation.
Why someone who calls for killing of babies can't be god? He himself is the creator of the baby.Here you're dictating god about how he should behave,and denying the fact that god is the one who "dictates",that he's beyond any kind of reproach for whatever he does.
If god were acting as per your definition of "good boy",would have you submitted to him then? Was it enough proof of his divinity?
he dindint want them to eat the fruit on the tree he told them not to he dindint just not tell them anything then yes they would want to eat off the tree.he wiped out most peopl e with the flood because they were evil beside noah who he saved so he could bring up the rest of the people the right way because of course he was the only good one left.duh get your facts straight before you go agianst what gods word says
THE MUSLIMS HELPED THEIR JEWISH AND CHRISTIAN NEIGHBOURS DURING XMAS AND THE NEW YEAR..THEY ALWAYS HAVE HELPED THEM AND ALWAYS WILL (NOT ONLY ON XMAS BUT EVERY DAY) SO LONG AS THERE IS ISLAM IN THEIR LIVES..AS MUSLIMS ARE COMMANDED TO SERVE HUMANITY
THEY HELP THEM BY GIVING THEM FOOD PARCELS, GIFTS, CARING FOR THEM, SHOPPING, PROTECTING THEM, INVITING THEM IN THE HOME ETC.
PAT CONDEMNALL MUSLIMS CANNOT AND WILL NOT ACCEPT THIS PROFOUND REALITY.MAY GOD MAKE HIS HEART SOFT
It's funny that religious folk are so prepared to accept God's character, when without doubt, when we encounter humans with a comparable character, we'd deem their behaviour unacceptable.
Par...God knew about the sin of Adam and Eve before he even created them. This was an introduction of the human race to the realm of Good and Evil. God never abandoned us, he gave a chance to rejoin him in afterlife if we live a life of righteousness. Your understanding of the bible is extremely ridiculous, I emphasize EXTREMELY.
The story of the sacrifice of Isaac by Abraham is not that simple as you seem to think it is.. If you understood the message God is revealing in that story you would not have made that comment. PAT...YOUR IGNORANCE IS YOUR WORST ENEMY
@bishayy If a voice in your head tells you to go kill your child, and it is God doing so as a test of your faith... I'm speechless, how do you defend such a psychopath?
I have no doubt in what I'd say, "I need a shrink" and while we wait - fuck off God!
To those who believe in god. Dude there are people being raped, enslaved, and dieing out there. There are those who have uncureable disease, and are too poor for finding cures
@EIGHTYNINENINERS um yeah dumbass. god is supposedly omniscient, omnibelevolent and omnipresent. this means he is responsible for EVERYTHING that occurs in our universe. don't just throw in the bullshit devil excuse because god created him as well.
@thrashblackdeath666 Is God responsible for your blasphemy too? Or your lying tongue? How about your covetous heart? Since He created it, that makes Him responsible? Is God on trial on judgement day or you? That will fly about as far as you can throw 500lbs. You can listen to whatever fools you have been indoctrinated by and see where they are on the day of judgement or you can listen to the revealed Word of the Living God. He alone can save you from His righteous wrath.
@martijnroth And what makes you laugh and call it invalid? It is because you have no proof. I remember those days. I was in rebellion too. I would still be had not the Lord God pulled me out of it. The problem is this, when you love your sin, like you do. It makes you hate God. Just like this man on this video. I mean do bank robbers want to be unmasked in the day & exposed? No. You are a criminal in God's eyes. That is why you need God. I pray God opens your eyes to that one day.
@EIGHTYNINENINERS "You are a criminal in God's eyes. That is why you need God."
According to the bible, everyone is a criminal and biblegod doesn't give a shit - just heap on any and all punishment you think you deserve onto Jesus, the schizophrenic scapegoat, and off you go to a magic happy place.
Yep,Pat,you finally got something right. God created us because he gets off on watching us suffer. He only reluctantly allows goodness,happiness & joy to exists because if they didn't suffering,pain & sorrow would simply the Norm.He needs the contrast to increase the suffering.
@AlastrianEmerald Air force pilots experience the so called "near death" thing when they travel at a high rate of speed. You are delusional. Fuck Jesus.
@AlastrianEmerald Mark S. Smith seems mainstream. What's so unusual about his writings? I don't treat the entire Bible as one form of literature and take it all literally at face value. Your statement "...no outside sources that...corroborate...its ideas about God or the afterlife" continues to make not make any sense no matter how may times its repeated. I've already responded more than once.
@AlastrianEmerald "The Problem of Paul" was written by Hyam Maccoby, and does not fare well in book reviews/critiques. I treat the New Testament as literature, i.e. narratives, letter correspondences, and apocalyptic. Every textual account has its history: an event, witnesses to an event, testimony of the witnesses, commitment to writing.
The only psycho here is you, and by the way humans were not created by god but by the annunaki, the bible is over 80 books. Why do you listen to other people search yourself. I don't get you. Offensive - why bother good bye.
Did it ever occur to you that you're wrong and that your perspective, this little history lesson is worthless. As if you deserve to be happy, with all the evil that people create, god is here for people that understand reason, which you do not. You do not have reason. Did it ever occur to you to communate with god. NO, you read the bible which I don't read. What a weak argument. I spent 25 years and a 1,000 books searching for god, and he communicates with me, but that's caring about god.
@AlastrianEmerald Josephus lived during the first century. His "Antiquities of the Jews" is dated ca. 94, about the same time as the Gospel of John. 'Already said the value of Josephus is evidence for the historicity of Christ, not the doctrinal statements. 'Already stated why the New Testament is the specific source for Christology. The purpose of oral history is to preserve accuracy as do the letters often describe, which is a little more than hearsay.
I am riding from MA-FL to promote an evangelism book
Buy the book at lulu.com (just type on search bar - Heleno Henzo)
Generated profits will go to evangelism fund
Help me spread the good news
“If I proclaim the gospel, this gives me no ground for boasting, for an obligation is laid on me, and woe betide me if I do not proclaim the gospel!” I Corinthians 9:16
@AlastrianEmerald Once again, your request does not make sense because such a concept of Christ was unique at the time within a sect of Judaism -- hence the New Testament. Josephus, among others, are 1st century records of Christ. Scholars understand Josephus' authenticity to be in essence a record of Christ's historicity, but see the doctrinal statements to be later Christian embellishment.
@AlastrianEmerald There was a process of canonization regarding the sifting of concepts about Christ; one big contender was Gnosticism. You are just raising hackneyed statements. Your request for non biblical evidence of Christ dying for humanity's sins is ludicrous. Such a concept of Christ was unique at the time as a sect within Judaism, those records being the New Testament which records opposition to the new theology. Even so, there is non biblical record of Christ's existence.
God is the Theist answer for everything because they actually know nothing at all. They would have an easier time stealing sheeple from other flocks than try to convert an Atheist. All we hear when a Theist talks is Blah blah, fear Him, blah blah, worship him, blah blah, or he'll see to it you suffer the worst possible torment for eternity, blah. Petty, ego driven psychopath. Sounds like a mad made deity to me.
@TheCrimsonification What's a "mad made deity?" You are the one who sounds petty and ego driven. Did you know you're a psychopath based solely on your atheism?
@WinteRest49 Guess what dipshit. I'm not like the other Atheist that want to reason have an intellectual convo with Theists. I'm sick of trying to talk sense to you ego maniacal fucktards. Your belief don't make you right or better. Wrap your fucking Bibblit pages into a goddamn noose and sway to and fucking fro. Your a fucking zombie, best not to spread your MAN MADE plague. Lick cunt yeast, you pitstain sniffin' Bibblit thumpin', god fearin' indoctrinated jackoff sock collecting asscrack.
@AlastrianEmerald The apostolic churches relied on the testimony of the original witness. The "gospel(s)" was an oral tradition until the demise of the original witnesses. The letters are older than the Gospels, from a time when the original witnesses were obviously still alive. Traditional authorship of the Gospels is inconsequential, since it is now known through literary analysis that they are a synthesis of oral traditions finally committed to writing. Psycho, thy name is atheist.
@AlastrianEmerald There's evidence in the New Testament itself (i.e., literary criticism) that the intent was to refer to actual events. There are connections between the letters and the Gospels. Okay, Sherlock? I'm glad you can realize that Christianity actually exists.
@OneEnlightned Yes, you the enlightened idiot shit who needs evidence in order to believe. The testimony of Josephus is evidence that Christ was historical. If you want evidence there was a following called "Christianity," there is no better source than the New Testament -- whether or not you agree with it. Okay, Mr. Bigshotman?
@WinteRest49 If you believe that just because there was a following called christianity, founded in a time of supreme ignorance and superstition, that constitutes evidence that its historical, then you must also believe in Buddhism and Hinduism, after all, they have followers. How about Ba'al, Astarte, these gods were written about in Sumeria and widely believed. That is evidence, right?
If there is a god,then that god is boredom...because the only reason a god will create a world just to care for what humans do with their dicks,MUST be the most bored thing in the universe.
For me...what's annoying is that people worship a monster,and the facts that it's a monster is all over the bible...in every option,that god just prove itself to be a huge pile of shit-yet he loves you.
Shish...people are willing to hear the word "Love" more then "Reason",simply because it's just easier!!!
@Wharwulif Yes, yes it is the irrational approach of YouTube atheism which negates reason for the love of genitalia. The negation of reason is demonstrative of the atheistic psychosis.
@WinteRest49 hmm...I'm not an atheist,I believe in Everything and The Nothing-meaning that I believe that every option exist at the same time,it's the ultimate theorist in a way,yet my faith resides within the Non-existing Nothing.
Actually,the bible is FULL of god telling people what to do with their privet parts and needs,so...you can't put that obsession of humanity just on "atheists",it's kinda global in human stupidity,therefor I did not negate any reason.
@WinteRest49 The only shit I'm full of is the one I see that humans have been doing with this planet for many years,they turned their planet to a dump,and they worship a monster.
I do not make any claims to be deep,or wise...but I'm perceptive to what goes on within the world,and I speak upon what I see.
If you refuse to listen,your problem eventually...at the moment you are the one who do not present anything even slightly profound,And your words can easily be replaced by lame profanity-Shame.
@WinteRest49 True,but the problem goes BEYOND money...after all,humans have taken each others and others guts out for many many reasons across history...
Blood war and over all "evilness" if you may call it like that simply run with humans.
And eventually,their true worship-is to themselves and their endless growth...and that's the bad part.
So...even if you take out the money system,then humans will find Other ways to abuse and torment each other,and will go to worship something ells.
@WinteRest49 If you do not understand something,simply ask me what-I got no problem to further talk about things either here or within privet message.
So,go ahead and explain to me what you do not realize,and I'll do my best to explain myself to you.
Also,you might state your own opinions has well-since up until now you did not present anything of importance besides the fact that people DO worship money.
@WinteRest49 The "Love" I spoke of is the belief of religious people that a god wants the best for them...So,they ignore everything bad around them,and focus on tiny acts that seems "good" to them.
That is why you see allot of people being over existed about tiny "miracles" yet very ignorant towards bigger things by saying "God works in strange ways"
The "Reason" part is that if there is a god,then all it does is filling in it's boredom-Since it's obvious that the world was constructed by horror
but it certainly is bang on. "No further proof is needed by those who believe. No proof is possible for those who don't want to believe". Historical records dating back to ancient Rome state that Jesus was known to authorities at that time. Not only did Christs followers write about him but also Christ's enemies! You don't write about somebody who did not exist and have his foes do the same! What do you consider to be proof? How far are you willing to go to find it?
If you're convinced that skeptics are correct about what they say and believe, well, good luck to you! Skeptics and evidence are like trying to mix oil and water. Skeptics demand proof but they reject anything that is presented to them. They want the world to hear what they have to say but they skof and laugh at anything others have to say especially if it contradicts their beliefs. Sure I can keep an "open mind" or I can focus on the truth. I don't know who wrote the following statement...
@mysticgatekeeper Who cares if Jesus is real or not?He did nothing of importance!!! all he done was doing some momentary show-off,lots of talking...and lots of promising.
Eventually...if there was a Jesus,he did nothing but create a religion of followers...that's that,has for the rest of it-complete crap.
Because...besides making the path clear for something like the Inquisition to come...what exactly did Jesus do? Die while knowingly being Reanimated later?also...he killed fish! so SCREW HIM!!!
Actually if you look very closely at the jewish scriptures there isn't just one god. There are many gods. Which is why he commands that " thou shalt have no other gods before me." He is not just referring to gold idols as most would assume.
Additionally, if you read Genesis 6 it is obvious that he didn't flood the world because man was bad. There was a gene pool problem that had to be eliminated.
People like you aren't interested in truth. You're only interested in hearing things that appeal to you. Nothing more.
What you think means nothing in the grand scheme of things. What you believe has no bearing on reality. You're 100% wrong in all you think and say. You're just a liar and a complete fool. Your opinion is meaningless. That is the only truth about you.
You're not worth my time any longer. You lost your debate long before it started.
Quite frankly, what you think means nothing. So far you haven't been able to answer the simple question of what do you base truth on if you reject the bible. If you reject scripture then you are saying all that's in it is a complete lie. If the bible is a lie then Jesus was a liar and in turn a lunatic to has been misleading and coning people to this very day. If you don't believe the bible then you will be quick to believe anything as long as it tickles your ears.
You claim you watched my video I shared with you but based on your comment, I highly doubt it.
You have very strong comments but no evidence to back them up with. I remind you that strong comments demand strong evidence and so far you haven't shared a shred of evidence. This is how you defend your faith? This is how you show people that you are correct? This is the best you can do??
You are no different than any other demented atheist. You use opinions as fact but nothing you say has any truth to it. I have history and science to support what I say and I always expect a person to prove me wrong if I am wrong. You on the other hand are full of excuses. You refuse to examine facts and hide behind excuses.
You again failed to answer a very simple question I asked. What is your source of truth?
You want evidence, huh? Ok, I can give you evidence based on history and science. First. I have discussed slavery from biblical times with numerous people such as yourself and due to the ammount of detail I can't post all of the facts here so I have made a short video which you can find in my list. Go look and I challenge you to prove any of it wrong. Second. If you want evidence proving God is real, how far are you willing to go to find it? What you prepared to do to seek it out?
You said "suggestive" evidence? You are listening to somebody who is suggesting what may be? Are you that insane that you are willing to throw the dice and HOPE that something that you want is waiting on the other side of life??
Again, you didn't provide a solid answer. What do you base your facts on? If you were to die in the next 60 seconds. Do you know for a fact where you will be 3 minutes after that?
Just out of curiosity I'd like to ask you something. I noticed your name, "waragainstchrist666". Can you please explain to us what exactly is it about Christ that you hate and why? What has Christ ever done to you personally that you have such a hatred towards him?
What exactly are you saying slavery consisted of in the Bible? I can prove you 100% wrong based on history and the bible working hand in hand. Are you willing to take up that challenge?
You have just given us your opinion and opinions are not fact. Strong opinions demand strong evidence. Where is yours? You have a lot to say but nothing to provide as proof. This is how you defend your so called faith? Pathetic.
I understood what you said. You clearly don't understand what I said to you. If you claim you are a christian and reject the bible (God's word) what do you base your faith on? If you don't believe in the Bible's version then what version do you accept and how do you know that it's correct?
You also claim God endorsed slavery! You have just proven how ignorant you really are. God in fact states that slavery is punishable by death.
IF you call yourself a christian then how can you reject the bible? What is your source of Gods word and truth? If you reject the bible then you reject everything that Christ did and you cannot be called a christian.
People such as yourself always demand proof about God and biblical claims but as soon as you are handed evidence you dismiss is immediately. Why? You argue that the bible is wrong. You deny there are any scientific or historical facts supporting any part of it. Doesn't science demand that we follow the evidence wherever it leads? You atheists refuse to do this. Why?
You've made it clear that you reject any and all evidence out there. How will you ever know what the truth is then if you are
The problem is many believe that the Bible truly is the word of God because they are brainwashed. It sucks that most of the brainwashed are too far gone to except the truth that their god is a false god.
the case. To date, no scientific find has ever refuted anything the bible says. If you atheists used the same logic about any historical person or event the way you use it against the bible then all of human history would be called a myth.
You have a lot to say about something you don't understand. Strong claims demand strong evidence and you have none. If you did then the world would have access to it long long ago. Show us your proof that the bible and all it says is a 100% complete lie.
I find it ammusing how you atheists think and ONLY think you can prove or disprove anything. The bottom line here is this. Either the bible is 100% about everything OR you are wrong about everything. You despise the idea of there being a God so to remove yourself from the equation you MUST fabricate a way out from God. If what your say about science not supporting biblical claims is true then the bible is a complete hoax. In fact, it would be the greatest hoax in human history. However, that's
The fact remains that you don't have any evidence to support YOUR claims that the bible is at fault in any way. Any archeological evidence ever found supports bible claims but you already know this because archaeologi is science & history. If either of these two found conflicting evidence then you would also have these facts in your hand but you don't. I don't need to provide anything for you because the facts already exist. You just don't want to admit to it. Prove me wrong if you can.
If, and I repeat, IF you have documented evidence that proves the biblical texts where either forged, or, proven to be younger than they claim to be only then will you have a valid claim. Sadly for you there is no validation to your claims. If there were these would have been made known hundreds of years ago. Skeptics desperately try to find ways to refute but they fail every time thanks to science. Note I didn't say due to the bible. I said science proves you wrong each time.
Tirade?! If that's what you want to call it then fine. My point is that original texts from that era exist to this date which 1. Proves nothing has been changed when compared to the bible of today. 2. if the texts are that old (2000) years and this has been proven by science then you have no argument. In fact, your comments are baseless based on historical and scientific facts established using carbon dating to validate the age of these texts. Sorry, you have no defence here. You lost.
You use the word "unbiased" but in fact people such as yourself are extremely biased. You don't like what something says so you will find ways to refute it. Sorry, your empty opinion has no bearing on reality.
Rather than relying on ignorance to fuel your stupidity, how about YOU explain it to us instead? Explain this to everybody then. How do you know the difference between truth and lie? What is your source for setting these two apart?
Ah yes, refuted by "experts". So what I'm to understand here is that you yourself have never taken the time to study anything. You prefer to have somebody tell you what to believe?
I have a challenge for atheists and that includes this angry old man. You people claim but only claim God isn't real. If that is the case I want to know why no atheist has ever been willing to explain the prophesy of Daniel about the revived roman empire. Considering it's over 2000 years old and 100% accurate, why won't atheists put that to the challenge? Are you people to cowardly to stand up to something that can't be dismissed? I can understand this old fool but what about the rest?
I finally figured PAT CONDELL Old PAT is a Atheist-Zionist-Jew. (Atheist, anti-christian,-anti-arab, Pro-Leftwing. Entertainer, Columnist-precher-reporter. Always Advocates Israel. Advocates Homosexuality and other perverted immoral things (In Denial About about jews) Criticizes only other religions but Jewish. Faults the Koran and Bible; however never the Torah. Plain and Simple a Jewish Person
Remember that it is others that fight for the jewish interests and not their jewish soldiers blood.
I could sit for hours listening to you. Hang on, I have been sitting here for hours listening to you. But I do have some sinning that needs doing that isn't going to do itself, I'll be right back.
It actually doesn't say "thou shalt not kill" in the bible. It says "thou shalt not murder" and the old Hebrew word for murder only applies to other Jews. So killing non-Jews is perfectly OK according to the bible.
this old man... its funny how u got the guts to do a video with that uggly face u mothefucker :) sinning to do?? jaja i doubt a girl wud want u.. i mean ur so uggly and disgunting :) get a life sucker... bye bitch... satan is goin to rape u in hell jajajajaja yep yep bye..
@omaar26 You are brainwashed. Can you not see how much hate religion has pumped into you? Oh, and isn't hate just as bad as murder according to the all-loving, all-forgiving God?
@Harvoable , what I seem to hear from the religious nilly willies is that ALL sins are forgivable EXCEPT dishonoring god. lmao. what a vain fuck head he must be.
Abraham was a disgusting story to learn at school. I was so angry hearing it I made an enemy of the religious tutor who went on to give me a hard time.. Anyway, I read a defense of the story by Soren Kierkegaard. It was interesting as an examination of psychological oppression. "two massive body blows" lol.
I fell short of christains, Not GOD, when I found out they didn't believe in Dinosaurs because the earth is not that old.???? Also I found to my disapointment that looking up at star clusters and appreciating Gods work, if physics is God then so be it, didn't mean much to them. To me the marvel of the universe and all that is in it is Gods tapastry. Not for show or a need for appreciation, just because it's there. And we have a gift, whether dilberate or not, to say.....Wow look at that.
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions of tons of Earth soil)
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital structures, organs, reproductive systems were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news on fossils, genetics, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit the Institute for Creation Research site.
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life and the universe work don’t mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete and living cell, the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell originate when no directing code or mechanisms existed in nature?
WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith science supports. Natural laws explain how an airplane or a cell works, but undirected natural laws cannot bring about either. Once there's a complete cell, the code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell originate when there was no directing code.
SCIENTISTS HAVE NEVER CREATED LIFE. And, even if they do it won't be by chance but by intelligent design. By genetically engineering already existing forms of life, scientists have produced new forms of life, but they did not produce these new life forms from non-living matter. Even in synthetic life, scientists design and build DNA from scratch, through intelligent design, and then insert their man-made DNA into an already living cell. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
THE ODDS of the sequence of molecules in a cell coming together by chance are similar to the odds of magnetic letters randomly bonding together in a sequence to form all the words and sentences in a dictionary. Without the right sequence, a cell's molecules won't work. Amino acids can come by chance but not proteins. Without DNA there can be no proteins and vice versa. Gradually won't do. It's all at once or not at all for a cell's survival. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
NATURAL SELECTION DOESN'T PRODUCE ANYTHING. It can only "select" from what is produced that has survival value. If a variation occurs that helps a species survive, that survival is called being "selected." That's all it is. There's no conscious selection by nature. It's a passive process. Natural selection is a figure of speech. The term itself is a tautology. Natural selection only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select," not produce or arrange. If a variation survives, that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), and arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of true transitional forms in the fossil record and lack of "age" sequence of the fossil layers. Discussion of mixed species (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum).
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
GENETIC INFORMATION CANNOT HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST prevents macro-evolution. Natural selection wouldn't preserve the evolution of new traits because they wouldn't have any survival value. A partially-evolved hand evolving from a previous trait, partially-evolved tissues, organs, biological structures would make a species unfit for survival. There are no fossils of partially-evolved species. All species of plants and animals in the fossil record are complete and fully-formed. They came into existence as complete!
NEW SPECIES: Although new species have come into existence, they don't carry any new genes. They've become new species only because they can't be crossed back with the original parent stock for various biological reasons. A biological "kind" allows for new species but not new genes. Nature has no ability to invent new genes for new traits. Only limited variations and adaptations are possible in nature, and all strictly within a biological "kind" (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.).
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
"JUNK DNA" ISN'T JUNK: Recent research shows that these segments of DNA are vital in regulating gene expression (when, where, and how genes are expressed). There's no room for random mutations to operate safely. Random mutations, from radiation, are destructive. Even for every good one there would be hundreds of harmful ones with the net effect, over time, causing harm and even extinction, not upward evolution. Genetic similarities are better explained due to a common design for common purposes.
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed or useless
DISORDER IN THE UNIVERSE is no argument against God's existence. The disorder is because of chance and entropy, but the order can only be rationally explained due to design. If I discovered a broken watch on the ground, the disorder is no evidence that there wasn't a designer behind the watch. Please read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
The Islamic scholars thoroughly exceeded Grecian output in the exact Sciences as well as in religion and philosophy. (1, H.R Turner, Science in Medieval Islam. 2, George Sarton, Introduction to the History of Science. 3, J. Bernal, Science in History. 4, Carra De Vaux, The Philosophers of Islam. 5, Thomas Goldstein, Dawn of Modern Science. 6, Dictionary of Scientific Biography.
pxpaul 5 hours ago
Let me give you a little advice: this kind of phenomenon are sent or allowed by God, Try to expose your opinion and the same time prevent algid discussions. Look around, look around.
Leivinn20 1 day ago
If we assume that natural laws are absolute, then we must assume that our thoughts are determined by natural laws, therefore, the will doesn't exist?!?!?!?. The self-conscious universal environment is called God, and Yes, God is able to read our mind. Learn something about theology, please.
Leivinn20 1 day ago
deuteronomy 13: CAN'T YOU FEEL GOD'S LOVE?!?
lmfao XD
mimikawaii7386 3 days ago
Stop holding back Pat, just say it the way you feel it :) peace
whytepirate 5 days ago
Best video on you tube!!!
ozztenn 1 week ago in playlist Favorite videos
God does as he pleases, don't you understand? I'm tired of the "Evil" God argument, this is just a red herring for not accepting God's dictates and continue their sinful lives just as Pat says - in a cynical way - at the end. In any case, death is bad for humans but not bad from God's perspective specially when pagan babies in the Old Testament are saved from eternal damnation.
raponte1955 1 week ago
@raponte1955
"when pagan babies in the Old Testament are saved from eternal damnation."
As 'pagan" babies were saved from eternal damnation by Mohamed's armies.Their evil parents resisted the will of Allah so they had to be destroyed.
repulsivedogma 4 days ago
Why someone who calls for killing of babies can't be god? He himself is the creator of the baby.Here you're dictating god about how he should behave,and denying the fact that god is the one who "dictates",that he's beyond any kind of reproach for whatever he does.
If god were acting as per your definition of "good boy",would have you submitted to him then? Was it enough proof of his divinity?
binaryhell 1 week ago
he dindint want them to eat the fruit on the tree he told them not to he dindint just not tell them anything then yes they would want to eat off the tree.he wiped out most peopl e with the flood because they were evil beside noah who he saved so he could bring up the rest of the people the right way because of course he was the only good one left.duh get your facts straight before you go agianst what gods word says
TheBabyhersh 3 weeks ago
PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT:
THE MUSLIMS HELPED THEIR JEWISH AND CHRISTIAN NEIGHBOURS DURING XMAS AND THE NEW YEAR..THEY ALWAYS HAVE HELPED THEM AND ALWAYS WILL (NOT ONLY ON XMAS BUT EVERY DAY) SO LONG AS THERE IS ISLAM IN THEIR LIVES..AS MUSLIMS ARE COMMANDED TO SERVE HUMANITY
THEY HELP THEM BY GIVING THEM FOOD PARCELS, GIFTS, CARING FOR THEM, SHOPPING, PROTECTING THEM, INVITING THEM IN THE HOME ETC.
PAT CONDEMNALL MUSLIMS CANNOT AND WILL NOT ACCEPT THIS PROFOUND REALITY.MAY GOD MAKE HIS HEART SOFT
pxpaul 3 weeks ago
Do you have a life or just take videos of how much you hate your creator!
MikeF304 3 weeks ago
@MikeF304
Pat realizes that the god of the bible is a contradictory,evil,pychotic idiot...and ..he is right!!
AmethystForest 3 weeks ago 3
I positively adore this man. Not in a gay way. Wel, maybe a little in a gay way.
Snakepliskinist 3 weeks ago 9
God...the Wal-mart of gods.
Snakepliskinist 3 weeks ago
This video should be required to watch before students can graduate high school!
ozztenn 3 weeks ago in playlist Favorite videos
It's funny that religious folk are so prepared to accept God's character, when without doubt, when we encounter humans with a comparable character, we'd deem their behaviour unacceptable.
terentzable 4 weeks ago
@terentzable i agree god truly is barbaric in the old new testement torah and quaran
GAREMPOTS 3 weeks ago
hasn't this guy got anything better to do?
ekall100 4 weeks ago
@ekall100 hypocrite! you're watching the videos..
terentzable 4 weeks ago
haha great video
Thjestir 1 month ago
What a well put together speech, like everyone of his other videos of course.
jianfeishao 1 month ago
I see only one psycho here and he is pretty old...
KidJohnnyStorm 1 month ago
@KidJohnnyStorm are you an old man then?
topperheartramada 4 weeks ago
@topperheartramada Did you saw me somewhere in this video?
KidJohnnyStorm 4 weeks ago
@KidJohnnyStorm You got sawed?
topperheartramada 4 weeks ago
@topperheartramada I think i didn't..
KidJohnnyStorm 4 weeks ago
Comment removed
refref2007 1 month ago
Not that it matters, but the Tower of Babel happened after the flood.
cowgodgames 1 month ago
Par...God knew about the sin of Adam and Eve before he even created them. This was an introduction of the human race to the realm of Good and Evil. God never abandoned us, he gave a chance to rejoin him in afterlife if we live a life of righteousness. Your understanding of the bible is extremely ridiculous, I emphasize EXTREMELY.
bishayy 1 month ago
@bishayy I understand that you know this to be true, even though the only evidence you claim is in a fictitious book that says so.
List what it is that you understand about finding out what is true.
EvolBob1 1 month ago
@EvolBob1 look at your inbox
bishayy 1 month ago
The story of the sacrifice of Isaac by Abraham is not that simple as you seem to think it is.. If you understood the message God is revealing in that story you would not have made that comment. PAT...YOUR IGNORANCE IS YOUR WORST ENEMY
bishayy 1 month ago
@bishayy If a voice in your head tells you to go kill your child, and it is God doing so as a test of your faith... I'm speechless, how do you defend such a psychopath?
I have no doubt in what I'd say, "I need a shrink" and while we wait - fuck off God!
EvolBob1 1 month ago
The god of the bible was a mass murderer and that is fact.
MrPurpose79 1 month ago
To those who believe in god. Dude there are people being raped, enslaved, and dieing out there. There are those who have uncureable disease, and are too poor for finding cures
gergar121 1 month ago
@gergar121 And because there are evil things happening in the world, that is God's fault? Are you serious?
EIGHTYNINENINERS 1 month ago
@EIGHTYNINENINERS Yeah I am if there was a true god evil thing would never exist.
gergar121 1 month ago
@EIGHTYNINENINERS um yeah dumbass. god is supposedly omniscient, omnibelevolent and omnipresent. this means he is responsible for EVERYTHING that occurs in our universe. don't just throw in the bullshit devil excuse because god created him as well.
thrashblackdeath666 1 month ago
@thrashblackdeath666 Is God responsible for your blasphemy too? Or your lying tongue? How about your covetous heart? Since He created it, that makes Him responsible? Is God on trial on judgement day or you? That will fly about as far as you can throw 500lbs. You can listen to whatever fools you have been indoctrinated by and see where they are on the day of judgement or you can listen to the revealed Word of the Living God. He alone can save you from His righteous wrath.
EIGHTYNINENINERS 1 month ago
@EIGHTYNINENINERS
your bullshit cracks me up :-)
rofl
martijnroth 1 month ago
@martijnroth And what makes you laugh and call it invalid? It is because you have no proof. I remember those days. I was in rebellion too. I would still be had not the Lord God pulled me out of it. The problem is this, when you love your sin, like you do. It makes you hate God. Just like this man on this video. I mean do bank robbers want to be unmasked in the day & exposed? No. You are a criminal in God's eyes. That is why you need God. I pray God opens your eyes to that one day.
EIGHTYNINENINERS 1 month ago
@EIGHTYNINENINERS
Hahaha thank you! This is so hilarious! Keep the bullshit comming please!!
''you are a criminal in god's eyes'' HAHAHAHAHH and then you say I need god?! haahahhaahah
martijnroth 1 month ago
@EIGHTYNINENINERS "You are a criminal in God's eyes. That is why you need God."
According to the bible, everyone is a criminal and biblegod doesn't give a shit - just heap on any and all punishment you think you deserve onto Jesus, the schizophrenic scapegoat, and off you go to a magic happy place.
Bible mythology is ridiculous.
TheHigherVoltage 1 month ago
Back in the day when Pat made good videos..
Hirnlego999 1 month ago
gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay gay oh and GGGGGGGAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAYYYYYY!!!!!!!!
killermiller213 1 month ago
Yep,Pat,you finally got something right. God created us because he gets off on watching us suffer. He only reluctantly allows goodness,happiness & joy to exists because if they didn't suffering,pain & sorrow would simply the Norm.He needs the contrast to increase the suffering.
waitew 1 month ago
@AlastrianEmerald Air force pilots experience the so called "near death" thing when they travel at a high rate of speed. You are delusional. Fuck Jesus.
Hope2009pc 1 month ago
@Hope2009pc I really hope God saves you because hell burns hot and it is real regardless of what you believe.
EIGHTYNINENINERS 1 month ago
@EIGHTYNINENINERS You are delusional.
Hope2009pc 1 month ago
@Hope2009pc Again. No evidence. You are deceived
EIGHTYNINENINERS 1 month ago
@EIGHTYNINENINERS your gay
killermiller213 1 month ago
@killermiller213 I am not gay. But i know that you are too childish to debate.
EIGHTYNINENINERS 1 month ago
This guy is a great talker
x0x0x0x0x0ful 1 month ago 20
@AlastrianEmerald My pleasure.
WinteRest49 1 month ago
@AlastrianEmerald Mark S. Smith seems mainstream. What's so unusual about his writings? I don't treat the entire Bible as one form of literature and take it all literally at face value. Your statement "...no outside sources that...corroborate...its ideas about God or the afterlife" continues to make not make any sense no matter how may times its repeated. I've already responded more than once.
WinteRest49 1 month ago
@WinteRest49 Correction: "...continues to not make any sense..." Thanks.
WinteRest49 1 month ago
@AlastrianEmerald "The Problem of Paul" was written by Hyam Maccoby, and does not fare well in book reviews/critiques. I treat the New Testament as literature, i.e. narratives, letter correspondences, and apocalyptic. Every textual account has its history: an event, witnesses to an event, testimony of the witnesses, commitment to writing.
WinteRest49 1 month ago
The only psycho here is you, and by the way humans were not created by god but by the annunaki, the bible is over 80 books. Why do you listen to other people search yourself. I don't get you. Offensive - why bother good bye.
phellinisinistra 1 month ago
Did it ever occur to you that you're wrong and that your perspective, this little history lesson is worthless. As if you deserve to be happy, with all the evil that people create, god is here for people that understand reason, which you do not. You do not have reason. Did it ever occur to you to communate with god. NO, you read the bible which I don't read. What a weak argument. I spent 25 years and a 1,000 books searching for god, and he communicates with me, but that's caring about god.
phellinisinistra 1 month ago
@AlastrianEmerald Cite your source.
WinteRest49 1 month ago
@AlastrianEmerald Josephus lived during the first century. His "Antiquities of the Jews" is dated ca. 94, about the same time as the Gospel of John. 'Already said the value of Josephus is evidence for the historicity of Christ, not the doctrinal statements. 'Already stated why the New Testament is the specific source for Christology. The purpose of oral history is to preserve accuracy as do the letters often describe, which is a little more than hearsay.
WinteRest49 1 month ago
ARE YOU SERIUOS? IF GOD COMES TO SAVE YOU FROM DEATH, YOU WILL REJECT HIM?
THEHELENOHENZO 1 month ago
EVERYBODY HAS A LIMITED INCLUDE GOD
THEHELENOHENZO 1 month ago
DID YOU TRY 7TH DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH
THEHELENOHENZO 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I am riding from MA-FL to promote an evangelism book
Buy the book at lulu.com (just type on search bar - Heleno Henzo)
Generated profits will go to evangelism fund
Help me spread the good news
“If I proclaim the gospel, this gives me no ground for boasting, for an obligation is laid on me, and woe betide me if I do not proclaim the gospel!” I Corinthians 9:16
THEHELENOHENZO 1 month ago
@AlastrianEmerald Once again, your request does not make sense because such a concept of Christ was unique at the time within a sect of Judaism -- hence the New Testament. Josephus, among others, are 1st century records of Christ. Scholars understand Josephus' authenticity to be in essence a record of Christ's historicity, but see the doctrinal statements to be later Christian embellishment.
WinteRest49 1 month ago
@AlastrianEmerald There was a process of canonization regarding the sifting of concepts about Christ; one big contender was Gnosticism. You are just raising hackneyed statements. Your request for non biblical evidence of Christ dying for humanity's sins is ludicrous. Such a concept of Christ was unique at the time as a sect within Judaism, those records being the New Testament which records opposition to the new theology. Even so, there is non biblical record of Christ's existence.
WinteRest49 1 month ago
God is the Theist answer for everything because they actually know nothing at all. They would have an easier time stealing sheeple from other flocks than try to convert an Atheist. All we hear when a Theist talks is Blah blah, fear Him, blah blah, worship him, blah blah, or he'll see to it you suffer the worst possible torment for eternity, blah. Petty, ego driven psychopath. Sounds like a mad made deity to me.
TheCrimsonification 1 month ago
@TheCrimsonification What's a "mad made deity?" You are the one who sounds petty and ego driven. Did you know you're a psychopath based solely on your atheism?
WinteRest49 1 month ago
@WinteRest49 Guess what dipshit. I'm not like the other Atheist that want to reason have an intellectual convo with Theists. I'm sick of trying to talk sense to you ego maniacal fucktards. Your belief don't make you right or better. Wrap your fucking Bibblit pages into a goddamn noose and sway to and fucking fro. Your a fucking zombie, best not to spread your MAN MADE plague. Lick cunt yeast, you pitstain sniffin' Bibblit thumpin', god fearin' indoctrinated jackoff sock collecting asscrack.
TheCrimsonification 1 month ago
@TheCrimsonification Well, alrighty then. What's a "...sock collecting asscrack"?
WinteRest49 1 month ago
@AlastrianEmerald The apostolic churches relied on the testimony of the original witness. The "gospel(s)" was an oral tradition until the demise of the original witnesses. The letters are older than the Gospels, from a time when the original witnesses were obviously still alive. Traditional authorship of the Gospels is inconsequential, since it is now known through literary analysis that they are a synthesis of oral traditions finally committed to writing. Psycho, thy name is atheist.
WinteRest49 1 month ago
@AlastrianEmerald There's evidence in the New Testament itself (i.e., literary criticism) that the intent was to refer to actual events. There are connections between the letters and the Gospels. Okay, Sherlock? I'm glad you can realize that Christianity actually exists.
WinteRest49 1 month ago
You haven't done your research.
phellinisinistra 1 month ago
You're such a simpleton.
phellinisinistra 1 month ago
so funny cause its true C:
MsAwesomeasian 1 month ago
@OneEnlightned Yes, you the enlightened idiot shit who needs evidence in order to believe. The testimony of Josephus is evidence that Christ was historical. If you want evidence there was a following called "Christianity," there is no better source than the New Testament -- whether or not you agree with it. Okay, Mr. Bigshotman?
WinteRest49 1 month ago
@WinteRest49 If you believe that just because there was a following called christianity, founded in a time of supreme ignorance and superstition, that constitutes evidence that its historical, then you must also believe in Buddhism and Hinduism, after all, they have followers. How about Ba'al, Astarte, these gods were written about in Sumeria and widely believed. That is evidence, right?
8698gil 1 month ago
@8698gil Yes, that's right.
WinteRest49 1 month ago
If there is a god,then that god is boredom...because the only reason a god will create a world just to care for what humans do with their dicks,MUST be the most bored thing in the universe.
For me...what's annoying is that people worship a monster,and the facts that it's a monster is all over the bible...in every option,that god just prove itself to be a huge pile of shit-yet he loves you.
Shish...people are willing to hear the word "Love" more then "Reason",simply because it's just easier!!!
Wharwulif 1 month ago
@Wharwulif Yes, yes it is the irrational approach of YouTube atheism which negates reason for the love of genitalia. The negation of reason is demonstrative of the atheistic psychosis.
WinteRest49 1 month ago
@WinteRest49 hmm...I'm not an atheist,I believe in Everything and The Nothing-meaning that I believe that every option exist at the same time,it's the ultimate theorist in a way,yet my faith resides within the Non-existing Nothing.
Actually,the bible is FULL of god telling people what to do with their privet parts and needs,so...you can't put that obsession of humanity just on "atheists",it's kinda global in human stupidity,therefor I did not negate any reason.
Wharwulif 1 month ago
@Wharwulif I don't know; you sound full of shit to me. You should get over yourself and quit making gestures at profundity.
WinteRest49 1 month ago
@WinteRest49 The only shit I'm full of is the one I see that humans have been doing with this planet for many years,they turned their planet to a dump,and they worship a monster.
I do not make any claims to be deep,or wise...but I'm perceptive to what goes on within the world,and I speak upon what I see.
If you refuse to listen,your problem eventually...at the moment you are the one who do not present anything even slightly profound,And your words can easily be replaced by lame profanity-Shame.
Wharwulif 1 month ago
@Wharwulif The planet has been turned into a dump because we worship a monster; the monster is money.
WinteRest49 1 month ago
@WinteRest49 True,but the problem goes BEYOND money...after all,humans have taken each others and others guts out for many many reasons across history...
Blood war and over all "evilness" if you may call it like that simply run with humans.
And eventually,their true worship-is to themselves and their endless growth...and that's the bad part.
So...even if you take out the money system,then humans will find Other ways to abuse and torment each other,and will go to worship something ells.
Wharwulif 1 month ago
@Wharwulif With all due respect, I don't know what you're saying.
WinteRest49 1 month ago
@WinteRest49 If you do not understand something,simply ask me what-I got no problem to further talk about things either here or within privet message.
So,go ahead and explain to me what you do not realize,and I'll do my best to explain myself to you.
Also,you might state your own opinions has well-since up until now you did not present anything of importance besides the fact that people DO worship money.
Wharwulif 1 month ago
@Wharwulif 'Nevermind.
WinteRest49 1 month ago
@WinteRest49 What a shame...
Wharwulif 1 month ago
@Wharwulif 'No shame involved.
WinteRest49 1 month ago
@WinteRest49 The "Love" I spoke of is the belief of religious people that a god wants the best for them...So,they ignore everything bad around them,and focus on tiny acts that seems "good" to them.
That is why you see allot of people being over existed about tiny "miracles" yet very ignorant towards bigger things by saying "God works in strange ways"
The "Reason" part is that if there is a god,then all it does is filling in it's boredom-Since it's obvious that the world was constructed by horror
Wharwulif 1 month ago
how could anybody with a brain stick to
religious beliefs after watching Pat Condell ?
It's good to here common sense.
fekinel 2 months ago
but it certainly is bang on. "No further proof is needed by those who believe. No proof is possible for those who don't want to believe". Historical records dating back to ancient Rome state that Jesus was known to authorities at that time. Not only did Christs followers write about him but also Christ's enemies! You don't write about somebody who did not exist and have his foes do the same! What do you consider to be proof? How far are you willing to go to find it?
mysticgatekeeper 2 months ago
If you're convinced that skeptics are correct about what they say and believe, well, good luck to you! Skeptics and evidence are like trying to mix oil and water. Skeptics demand proof but they reject anything that is presented to them. They want the world to hear what they have to say but they skof and laugh at anything others have to say especially if it contradicts their beliefs. Sure I can keep an "open mind" or I can focus on the truth. I don't know who wrote the following statement...
mysticgatekeeper 2 months ago
@mysticgatekeeper Who cares if Jesus is real or not?He did nothing of importance!!! all he done was doing some momentary show-off,lots of talking...and lots of promising.
Eventually...if there was a Jesus,he did nothing but create a religion of followers...that's that,has for the rest of it-complete crap.
Because...besides making the path clear for something like the Inquisition to come...what exactly did Jesus do? Die while knowingly being Reanimated later?also...he killed fish! so SCREW HIM!!!
Wharwulif 1 month ago
@Wharwulif Yes, now I understand why atheists are psycho.
WinteRest49 1 month ago
Actually if you look very closely at the jewish scriptures there isn't just one god. There are many gods. Which is why he commands that " thou shalt have no other gods before me." He is not just referring to gold idols as most would assume.
Additionally, if you read Genesis 6 it is obvious that he didn't flood the world because man was bad. There was a gene pool problem that had to be eliminated.
Also, if y
rockmanreturns 2 months ago
People like you aren't interested in truth. You're only interested in hearing things that appeal to you. Nothing more.
What you think means nothing in the grand scheme of things. What you believe has no bearing on reality. You're 100% wrong in all you think and say. You're just a liar and a complete fool. Your opinion is meaningless. That is the only truth about you.
You're not worth my time any longer. You lost your debate long before it started.
mysticgatekeeper 2 months ago
Quite frankly, what you think means nothing. So far you haven't been able to answer the simple question of what do you base truth on if you reject the bible. If you reject scripture then you are saying all that's in it is a complete lie. If the bible is a lie then Jesus was a liar and in turn a lunatic to has been misleading and coning people to this very day. If you don't believe the bible then you will be quick to believe anything as long as it tickles your ears.
mysticgatekeeper 2 months ago
@mysticgatekeeper You can't use the Bible to prove the Bible.. you are using a circular argument..
Hope2009pc 2 months ago
I think both theists and atheists can agree on the injustices of religion.
WinteRest49 2 months ago
You claim you watched my video I shared with you but based on your comment, I highly doubt it.
You have very strong comments but no evidence to back them up with. I remind you that strong comments demand strong evidence and so far you haven't shared a shred of evidence. This is how you defend your faith? This is how you show people that you are correct? This is the best you can do??
mysticgatekeeper 2 months ago
You are no different than any other demented atheist. You use opinions as fact but nothing you say has any truth to it. I have history and science to support what I say and I always expect a person to prove me wrong if I am wrong. You on the other hand are full of excuses. You refuse to examine facts and hide behind excuses.
You again failed to answer a very simple question I asked. What is your source of truth?
mysticgatekeeper 2 months ago
You want evidence, huh? Ok, I can give you evidence based on history and science. First. I have discussed slavery from biblical times with numerous people such as yourself and due to the ammount of detail I can't post all of the facts here so I have made a short video which you can find in my list. Go look and I challenge you to prove any of it wrong. Second. If you want evidence proving God is real, how far are you willing to go to find it? What you prepared to do to seek it out?
mysticgatekeeper 2 months ago
You said "suggestive" evidence? You are listening to somebody who is suggesting what may be? Are you that insane that you are willing to throw the dice and HOPE that something that you want is waiting on the other side of life??
Again, you didn't provide a solid answer. What do you base your facts on? If you were to die in the next 60 seconds. Do you know for a fact where you will be 3 minutes after that?
mysticgatekeeper 2 months ago
GOD = GIVER OF DEATH
waragainstchrist666 2 months ago
Just out of curiosity I'd like to ask you something. I noticed your name, "waragainstchrist666". Can you please explain to us what exactly is it about Christ that you hate and why? What has Christ ever done to you personally that you have such a hatred towards him?
Can you explain?
mysticgatekeeper 2 months ago
What exactly are you saying slavery consisted of in the Bible? I can prove you 100% wrong based on history and the bible working hand in hand. Are you willing to take up that challenge?
You have just given us your opinion and opinions are not fact. Strong opinions demand strong evidence. Where is yours? You have a lot to say but nothing to provide as proof. This is how you defend your so called faith? Pathetic.
mysticgatekeeper 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I understood what you said. You clearly don't understand what I said to you. If you claim you are a christian and reject the bible (God's word) what do you base your faith on? If you don't believe in the Bible's version then what version do you accept and how do you know that it's correct?
You also claim God endorsed slavery! You have just proven how ignorant you really are. God in fact states that slavery is punishable by death.
mysticgatekeeper 2 months ago
unwilling to follow the evidence?
How far are you willing to go to find out what truth really is? What are you prepared to do to find the facts even if they prove you wrong?
Can you live with that?
mysticgatekeeper 2 months ago
IF you call yourself a christian then how can you reject the bible? What is your source of Gods word and truth? If you reject the bible then you reject everything that Christ did and you cannot be called a christian.
Explain your logic.
mysticgatekeeper 2 months ago
People such as yourself always demand proof about God and biblical claims but as soon as you are handed evidence you dismiss is immediately. Why? You argue that the bible is wrong. You deny there are any scientific or historical facts supporting any part of it. Doesn't science demand that we follow the evidence wherever it leads? You atheists refuse to do this. Why?
You've made it clear that you reject any and all evidence out there. How will you ever know what the truth is then if you are
mysticgatekeeper 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The problem is many believe that the Bible truly is the word of God because they are brainwashed. It sucks that most of the brainwashed are too far gone to except the truth that their god is a false god.
ihazapeefetish 2 months ago
Comment removed
ihazapeefetish 2 months ago
the case. To date, no scientific find has ever refuted anything the bible says. If you atheists used the same logic about any historical person or event the way you use it against the bible then all of human history would be called a myth.
You have a lot to say about something you don't understand. Strong claims demand strong evidence and you have none. If you did then the world would have access to it long long ago. Show us your proof that the bible and all it says is a 100% complete lie.
mysticgatekeeper 2 months ago
I find it ammusing how you atheists think and ONLY think you can prove or disprove anything. The bottom line here is this. Either the bible is 100% about everything OR you are wrong about everything. You despise the idea of there being a God so to remove yourself from the equation you MUST fabricate a way out from God. If what your say about science not supporting biblical claims is true then the bible is a complete hoax. In fact, it would be the greatest hoax in human history. However, that's
mysticgatekeeper 2 months ago
@IridaniEmerald
I'm right behind you brother! it's a shame these people close thier ears when we talk such sense.
ilikerossi 2 months ago
The fact remains that you don't have any evidence to support YOUR claims that the bible is at fault in any way. Any archeological evidence ever found supports bible claims but you already know this because archaeologi is science & history. If either of these two found conflicting evidence then you would also have these facts in your hand but you don't. I don't need to provide anything for you because the facts already exist. You just don't want to admit to it. Prove me wrong if you can.
mysticgatekeeper 2 months ago
If, and I repeat, IF you have documented evidence that proves the biblical texts where either forged, or, proven to be younger than they claim to be only then will you have a valid claim. Sadly for you there is no validation to your claims. If there were these would have been made known hundreds of years ago. Skeptics desperately try to find ways to refute but they fail every time thanks to science. Note I didn't say due to the bible. I said science proves you wrong each time.
mysticgatekeeper 2 months ago
Tirade?! If that's what you want to call it then fine. My point is that original texts from that era exist to this date which 1. Proves nothing has been changed when compared to the bible of today. 2. if the texts are that old (2000) years and this has been proven by science then you have no argument. In fact, your comments are baseless based on historical and scientific facts established using carbon dating to validate the age of these texts. Sorry, you have no defence here. You lost.
mysticgatekeeper 2 months ago
You use the word "unbiased" but in fact people such as yourself are extremely biased. You don't like what something says so you will find ways to refute it. Sorry, your empty opinion has no bearing on reality.
Rather than relying on ignorance to fuel your stupidity, how about YOU explain it to us instead? Explain this to everybody then. How do you know the difference between truth and lie? What is your source for setting these two apart?
mysticgatekeeper 2 months ago
Ah yes, refuted by "experts". So what I'm to understand here is that you yourself have never taken the time to study anything. You prefer to have somebody tell you what to believe?
You're just somebodies puppet, nothing more.
mysticgatekeeper 2 months ago
If you ever do find god and no one claims him in 30 days you get to keep him.
itsjustameme 2 months ago
I have a challenge for atheists and that includes this angry old man. You people claim but only claim God isn't real. If that is the case I want to know why no atheist has ever been willing to explain the prophesy of Daniel about the revived roman empire. Considering it's over 2000 years old and 100% accurate, why won't atheists put that to the challenge? Are you people to cowardly to stand up to something that can't be dismissed? I can understand this old fool but what about the rest?
mysticgatekeeper 2 months ago
GOD WAS VOLCANIC ACTIVITY
TheFogHornsAccount 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@patcondell Remind me exactly why you believe you are here?
red96219 2 months ago
"He flood's the entire planet because someone must of looked at him wrong" lol This has to be one of my favorite videos on you tube!
ozztenn 2 months ago
Abraham - what a fucking dumb name
FtKiVeR 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I finally figured PAT CONDELL Old PAT is a Atheist-Zionist-Jew. (Atheist, anti-christian,-anti-arab, Pro-Leftwing. Entertainer, Columnist-precher-reporter. Always Advocates Israel. Advocates Homosexuality and other perverted immoral things (In Denial About about jews) Criticizes only other religions but Jewish. Faults the Koran and Bible; however never the Torah. Plain and Simple a Jewish Person
Remember that it is others that fight for the jewish interests and not their jewish soldiers blood.
andjelicd70 2 months ago
I could sit for hours listening to you. Hang on, I have been sitting here for hours listening to you. But I do have some sinning that needs doing that isn't going to do itself, I'll be right back.
3nasacova 2 months ago 25
@3nasacova , You masturbate to Pat Condell videos ? Man, I thought I was beyond help.
yynnmmbb 2 months ago
It actually doesn't say "thou shalt not kill" in the bible. It says "thou shalt not murder" and the old Hebrew word for murder only applies to other Jews. So killing non-Jews is perfectly OK according to the bible.
TrangleC 2 months ago
''This guy got a trackrecord that would make Saddam look like Ghandi''
HILLARIOUS, EPIC! XD XD XD
EddieMotorhead 3 months ago 6
this old man... its funny how u got the guts to do a video with that uggly face u mothefucker :) sinning to do?? jaja i doubt a girl wud want u.. i mean ur so uggly and disgunting :) get a life sucker... bye bitch... satan is goin to rape u in hell jajajajaja yep yep bye..
omaar26 3 months ago
@omaar26 Your idiocy dumbfounds me!
ozztenn 3 months ago
@omaar26 Are you supposed to be a christian?
Jiminallofhisglory 3 months ago
@omaar26 You are brainwashed. Can you not see how much hate religion has pumped into you? Oh, and isn't hate just as bad as murder according to the all-loving, all-forgiving God?
Seriously, open your eyes.
Harvoable 2 months ago
@Harvoable , what I seem to hear from the religious nilly willies is that ALL sins are forgivable EXCEPT dishonoring god. lmao. what a vain fuck head he must be.
yynnmmbb 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What an argument. No surprise you are a believer....
Fangalatic 2 months ago
Abraham was a disgusting story to learn at school. I was so angry hearing it I made an enemy of the religious tutor who went on to give me a hard time.. Anyway, I read a defense of the story by Soren Kierkegaard. It was interesting as an examination of psychological oppression. "two massive body blows" lol.
fredbloggs02 3 months ago
Another best video. Great.
diphrent4yt 3 months ago in playlist More videos from patcondell
God bless this man
rookerzzz 3 months ago 2
Good this video finally finished, I got some sinning to do. lol
Nantchev 3 months ago
Faved this video
MetalheadBelial666 3 months ago
I fell short of christains, Not GOD, when I found out they didn't believe in Dinosaurs because the earth is not that old.???? Also I found to my disapointment that looking up at star clusters and appreciating Gods work, if physics is God then so be it, didn't mean much to them. To me the marvel of the universe and all that is in it is Gods tapastry. Not for show or a need for appreciation, just because it's there. And we have a gift, whether dilberate or not, to say.....Wow look at that.
isotopicdreams 3 months ago 6
This has been flagged as spam show
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions of tons of Earth soil)
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital structures, organs, reproductive systems were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news on fossils, genetics, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit the Institute for Creation Research site.
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life and the universe work don’t mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete and living cell, the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell originate when no directing code or mechanisms existed in nature?
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith science supports. Natural laws explain how an airplane or a cell works, but undirected natural laws cannot bring about either. Once there's a complete cell, the code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell originate when there was no directing code.
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENTISTS HAVE NEVER CREATED LIFE. And, even if they do it won't be by chance but by intelligent design. By genetically engineering already existing forms of life, scientists have produced new forms of life, but they did not produce these new life forms from non-living matter. Even in synthetic life, scientists design and build DNA from scratch, through intelligent design, and then insert their man-made DNA into an already living cell. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE ODDS of the sequence of molecules in a cell coming together by chance are similar to the odds of magnetic letters randomly bonding together in a sequence to form all the words and sentences in a dictionary. Without the right sequence, a cell's molecules won't work. Amino acids can come by chance but not proteins. Without DNA there can be no proteins and vice versa. Gradually won't do. It's all at once or not at all for a cell's survival. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL SELECTION DOESN'T PRODUCE ANYTHING. It can only "select" from what is produced that has survival value. If a variation occurs that helps a species survive, that survival is called being "selected." That's all it is. There's no conscious selection by nature. It's a passive process. Natural selection is a figure of speech. The term itself is a tautology. Natural selection only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select," not produce or arrange. If a variation survives, that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), and arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of true transitional forms in the fossil record and lack of "age" sequence of the fossil layers. Discussion of mixed species (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum).
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GENETIC INFORMATION CANNOT HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST prevents macro-evolution. Natural selection wouldn't preserve the evolution of new traits because they wouldn't have any survival value. A partially-evolved hand evolving from a previous trait, partially-evolved tissues, organs, biological structures would make a species unfit for survival. There are no fossils of partially-evolved species. All species of plants and animals in the fossil record are complete and fully-formed. They came into existence as complete!
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW SPECIES: Although new species have come into existence, they don't carry any new genes. They've become new species only because they can't be crossed back with the original parent stock for various biological reasons. A biological "kind" allows for new species but not new genes. Nature has no ability to invent new genes for new traits. Only limited variations and adaptations are possible in nature, and all strictly within a biological "kind" (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.).
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"JUNK DNA" ISN'T JUNK: Recent research shows that these segments of DNA are vital in regulating gene expression (when, where, and how genes are expressed). There's no room for random mutations to operate safely. Random mutations, from radiation, are destructive. Even for every good one there would be hundreds of harmful ones with the net effect, over time, causing harm and even extinction, not upward evolution. Genetic similarities are better explained due to a common design for common purposes.
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed or useless
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DISORDER IN THE UNIVERSE is no argument against God's existence. The disorder is because of chance and entropy, but the order can only be rationally explained due to design. If I discovered a broken watch on the ground, the disorder is no evidence that there wasn't a designer behind the watch. Please read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 3 months ago