I know what are those objects: simple space debris seen prvilegiata position very close to the planes of their orbits.
The objects that seem to make the seemingly sudden curves can be explained by indipendent axial rotation that exposes the viewer to different portions of the surface of these objects thus causing the illusion of curves sudden.
Not sure I understand your question, I apologize if I offended you for any reason. I checked out your videos, great site. Are you a photographer? I would like to understand your interpretation of the video, you may be able to add something for the other viewers as well. Was firstwave1 already taken...or are you the sequel?
Great video, thanks for taking the time and posting. Just wanted to say at the last during the tether mission, the objects that are scooting around the scene are out of focus debris, the lens used is a mirror type and creates a doughnut shape. This is a common phenomena with photography and mirror type lenses. The pulsing observed is the scan or refresh rate of the ccd camera, it looks amplified because the bits of debris are brightly lit and out of focus. We are not alone though.
There is a good explanation for this phenomena and I would probably agree with there findings. Check out this video. NASA STS-75 "Tether UFO" Video - Explained And Replicated
Definatly space critters. The idea that there is no life in all that space but some on earth is silly. They may not be carbon based or need water or o2 but that dosnt mean anything.
the key to space flight, is anti gravity... so say good bye to all your theories moron. humans have yet to figure that out... obviously another life form has....
Oh ya. I think they are Space critters. Possibly a space equivalent of algae. I have nothing to back this up of course, however I believe It based on a little bit of observation. Theres nothing wrong with that. Its not like publishing a book on it. I just think thats what they look like. If I had to guess that'd be it.
@MoronAntidote Makes loads of points that deserve attention, however FreeworldPolitics makes the best one. It doesn't matter how any of them are moving in curved paths towards Earth. I think what matters is there is a pulsating, similar sized and shaped objects that are clearly not debris. I am not a scientist or professional anything and have next to zero understanding of space, much like all of you. So lets all stop pretending we "know" whats going on and start asking what others think it is.
Actually it's a terrible point if you're trying to convince people that they're aliens. The fact that they look similar and pulsate is exactly what you'd expect to see if objects were nearfield and out of focus. All objects will take on an appearance determined by the lens design, and will appear to pulsate if they are not perfectly smooth/spherical but tumbling as inanimate always do in space.
Those who present videos which track the trajectories of these objects do nothing more than discredit their own argument. They fail to spot the fact that every single object which changes trajectory (as expected and predicted by virtue of simple orbital mechanics), only does so once, and the final trajectory is always in the direction of earth (which can be verified via unedited footage). It is not logical to suppose that controlled craft behave this way without exception.
Q1 Who thinks objects should travel in straight lines wherever they are in space?
Q2 Who thinks space is a total vacuum at shuttle orbital altitude?
Q3 Who hasn't realised that the absence of a total vacuum causes relative changes in trajectory depending upon mass, drag coefficient and surface area?
Q4 Who hasn't realised that a camera filming from a platform weighing 10s of tons viewing objects weighing grammes, will inevitably record predictable curved trajectories?
Remember people, the objects that are moving AREN'T moving on a 2D plane, a lot that you see will could me moving toward or away from the camera and it wouldn't be noticeable due to the over-exposure.
I believe that the rods and the orbs or UFOs are data collecting drones. They fly around the con or chem. Trails and in this case to collect information for the government. I have seen them behind large thunder storms before. But that is my opinion, go to Merced Cal. You get a good look at the rods and the orbs. As many as 40 at one time, you will need to watch closely they fly very fast. You will see them though.
these are lively creations from the energy so also NASA knows about this from the beginning these are powerful messengers which check this what is up the man that in case of troubles to know as to neutralize human weapons. Jesus taught schoolboys to pray " come Your " Kingdom all they know this request , what does she refer ? in the book Daniela 2 : 44 is the answer ! she is not the mile for politicians and these rule ! . Whether she is not as for days of Noah ?
these are lively creations from the energy so also NASA knows about this from the beginning these are powerful messengers which check this what is up the man that in case of troubles to know as to neutralize human weapons.
Wow there is alot of profanity on this site why is that? If these people wish to publish something "fake"this is Youboob" so what? If they want to publish something genuine so what? This is Youboob and you can video anything you want, period. Now when you go to the grocery store and pick up supplies for the whole week you don't start screaming at the "cashier or Grocery clerk" why is all this stuff here WTF?" Hope you don't anyway! Take what you need and move along that's all dude!
What alot of you people might want to do before making yourselves seem foolish is check here [space-video.info/shuttle/columbia-sts75] and if that doesnt help you may want to check YouTuber secretnasaman to compare this footage against many others. Hope this helps...
Secretnasaman is a nice enough guy, but he's a complete idiot when it comes to science.
He lives in his own world where personal beliefs are all that matters. He has no concept of orbital mechanics, which is why he believes any spec of light which doesn't travel in a straight line in space must be some kind of craft. Ironically, he should be looking for objects which do travel in straight lines, because that requires controlled propulsion within earth's grav. field.
@MoronAntidote Fair enough man, but there are a few he has that are clearly circular discs like the ones shown above with the footage quality looking similar, which was my point. Peace
@Flummmmmmi auhuah uahua you are all right.. but it seems that other vids are confirming these objects have been seen in space. maybe that is why we navigate the space and we also find JELLY FISHES :) IoI
@Furaxxxxx Yes, I know, you noticed that? It almost looks like they are swimming in space. One possibility is that this was filmed deep in the ocean, and it could also mean beings swim in space you could say.
I know this seems weird, but when you move your arms and legs, that wind, almost feels like water.
@leovraiel you are all right.. I made the almost the same comment on those unidentified object seen from shuttle mission that look like jelly fish :) IoI
@Furaxxxxx well .. infact at 2:35 when it is in black an white you can see these bacteria from inside the windows on the borders of the vid.... kind of weird!
And now they (NASA) are telling us, all out, that they've "discovered" a new habitable exo-planet!!! Wooohooo! Really old news from 2007, and actually they didn't came up with anything new ever since.
Instead of spending their money on really interesting stuff, like these, they (NASA) keep spending their money on disinformation... slightly disappointing ;-)
Obama may cut the budget to absolute zero on this Werner von Braun scam project. Who is Werner von Braun... look 'm up on wikipedia! LOL
Space is a vaccuum...but there are minute dust particles in space as well. My guess is that light pressure from the lamp on the tether is moving the dust particles. Note that the curved motions are in-synch when they reach what would be the "center" of the frame. Thoughts?
Hahahaha! What lamp? That is stray light from the sun that causes this image. And the "particles" cannot be affected like this in any way! Not in the vacuum, nor like this autonomous moves. For there would be a whole bunch of light and fans out there!
Oh, and "some" (read: the most) off centred "particles aren't in synch at all...
Look up the MSIS model, then consider how objects of different mass and drag coefficient behave in non-zero drag at ~17000mph, in the presence of earth's gravity.
Assumption failure #2 is that objects should travel in straight lines in space. Does the moon? Does the shuttle? Only an object with infinite velocity can travel in a straight line in the presence of earth's gravity.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
i think this is a whole bunch of crab they are trying to feed to people, even if these are the real ufo shit, why are they driving through each other, what kind of stiuped planet did they get their driving licence from hahaha, i think you people should go and pray to God more, and have some faith....sitting on your asses and making up boulshits and wors than that is that you fight each other over it too, i have a ufo in my pants, you wanna picture of it loosers??!!
At 1:20 look at the 5 brightest objects forming the pentagon shape, follow these on the actual footage and observe the similarities in speed and direction before and after zooming in/out. Also take note the direction the tether moves before and after, the directions are not what they should be for natural objects. There are also many faint objects within and outside the pentagon that have the same behaviour, most of the objects are within the pentagon. Coincidence? Camera trick?
@regfox2000 NO bodys going to believe your explaination. if they do then they are stupid. i take it you have seen the original footage? thats REAL NASA footage taken from space, EVERYONE knows that much. this is the same footage but just shows the flight paths of the UFO'S. i have herd some strange explainations but thats got to be the worst yet.
@regfox2000 SAID: "This is just the view under a microscope!!"
Come up with that epiphany all by your little self, did ya? Wow, we have ourselves another genius people and to think that even NASA didn't release they were recording movements from a petri dish, that's before Regfox figured it all out & he didn't even need to research it like the rest of us! (sarc)
You're a Moron! Even the intelligent skeptics do not contest the fact that this video was from NASA's STS-75 mission, u fool!
@regfox The only thing that involves a "microscope" around here, is using one to find your brain! Do some damn research next time before simply blurting shit out.
Arrogantly saying "just a microscope view" or the like, proves you're a big mouth know-it-all who really knows 0. What makes you pathetic, is how you're to frigging lazy to read all the other comments, as if you're better than everyone & don't need to waste your time because laughably you think no one else thought of it before you lol
don't fall of your chairs and DON'T MAKE ACCIDENTS ON THE ROAD WHEN YOU SEE THEM FLYING OVER IN THE SKY ABOVE YOU,WATCH OUT FOR THE PEOPLE AND THE TRAFFIC ON THE ROAD PLS!!!!
WE NEED ALL FOR A BETTER WORLD.
ALMOST THERE PEOPLE,LOOK DEEP IN TO YOUR HEART YOU KNOW WHAT YOU FEEL.
Can you say what I'm looking at exactly? I don't know what it is... but at times it looks like I'm looking at a recording of a petri dish under a high rez microscope. lol I could be wrong. Your vids about the moon are... intriguing, to say the least.
@om3ga123 Omega, This is a video of "objects" "flying" by a detached TETHER from the Space Station. The Tether is actually several MILES long, and is drifting away into space. They decided, since we fucked up and let this thing loose let's at least film it!
However....The lens does NOT explain how these objects change trajectory. I have renewed interest in this now
Yeah I've looked into this since posting and have noticed how the objects change trajectory. At first I thought it was debris or dust even but it's very strange how they change direction... intriguing indeed.
At 0:59 look at the 4 brightest objects on the left of the screen and above the tether, they all look exactly the same and if you draw a line between them all and what shape do you get? Check a video showing the whole footage and drag the time bar along and you see them moving at the same speed in the same direction until the camera zooms in, when the camera zooms out again drag the bar further and you'll see that they're moving in the opposite direction at same speed still, debris coincidence?
MoronAntidote Your going to report me? My video? LOL You're a FUCKEN RETARD! Youre such a pathetic low grade moron that you ASSUME EVERYTHING but have no proof of ANYTHING! By all means, have some fucking balls & PLEASE REPORT me, tell youtube that, in your paranoid twisted head that you "think" I'm the OP of this video! They will wind up finally banning you for all your spam & fucked up "assumptions"!
Everyone hates you & your foolish theories, that's why your comments are flagged, fool!
Moronantidote is the perfect example of why youTube needs to invent a method to rid this place of 13yr old know it all punks! Some 1 here said it best: your so called "facts" are nothing more than personal assumptions & theories, no better than the next guy. Who the fuck appointed you the God of knowledge and who are you to make fun of other people's theories or to say others are wrong, fuck u! I can only imagine how many times you get your punk ass handed to you in the real world.
Tell that to Newton and Kepler. Oh sorry, you can't because they're both dead. How ironic that you are not familiar with the works of such influential people, yet see fit to insult someone in their 40's who is. Not even the slightest hint of intelligence or respect for physics in your post, yet you accuse a stranger of being 13 years old. Go home, apologise to your parents and jump out of the fusking window. You are no use to this world kid.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Oh look, not one single object changes direction more than once. Hmm, i wonder why that could be? Woah they all eventually turn towards earth's center of gravity! Now that's interesting isn't it? I know, let's assume they're alien craft that have all lost propulsion and are therefore forced to obey the laws of orbital mechanics. Yeah that'll do it.
@MoronAntidote Look at 3:08, an object at the top has turned slightly to the right while maintaining an eastern direction instead of south (Towards Earth's centre of gravity) like the rest and continues heading in the same direction, as far as I know gravity doesn't work like that.
You cannot possibly get to grips with this without math. Attempting to do so will get you nowhere.
I don't know why you bother anyway. Not one single object changes direction more than once, and every change is towards earth. That's enough to make any retard think twice, even if they can't get to grips with the math.
@MoronAntidote Also what's your point in saying that no object changes direction more than once? Are you suggesting that intelligently controlled craft would turn multiple times?
Are you suggesting that dozens of supposed intelligently controlled craft should simply follow well established physical laws by all turning towards earth? Why would they do that if they were intelligently controlled? For god's sake think man! Are you suggesting that dozens of alien craft simultaneously lost propulsion, just so you can claim that a single turn is expected? Utterly absurd!
@MoronAntidote Now you're thinking that I believe all these things are craft lol, you're the one with terrible memory here, I've already told you that I believe most of it is debris.
There are plenty of objects that don't turn too and some that appear to be stationary.
Oh i remember what you said. The problem was that you said that only 'most of it was debris'. At that point you became a target for ridicule, most likely about to invoke witchcraft, pseudo-science or paranormal shite. I was right!
Ice clouds expand in all directions after sublimation in space - well known fact. So ice can have various trajectories w.r.t. the camera. It's not all ice, and some objects are stars. Why should all objects behave the same for christ's sake?
You're still dodging the fact that none of them change direction more than once, and that they all head towards earth. This is proof enough, but i'll humour you for a while longer since i enjoy laughing at your ignorance.
@MoronAntidote I alread pointed out that the object that makes a sudden, sharp turn head away from Earth, to expand to that - everything else that makes a turn curves naturally as they should and heads towards Earth, they don't turn slightly then carry on going straight.
@Ezriel54 Things don't "naturally" curve in space. They follow a straight path until encountering gravity, intense radiation, or another object. If you're suggesting the movements taken by these objects is dictated by the earth then all angles should be almost identical and ALL objects (on same trajectories) ought to behave as all others do.
What are the chances that these objects are reaching Earth's gravity and TURNING right there...practically none. FAIL
@pdderek You've got it wrong, it was MoronAntidote saying that stuff, I don't know much about the laws of gravity up there or anything else so I won't comment on it but I'll comment on what's obvious and you seem to have misinterpreted it. Read my comments in light of MoronAntidote's and you'll see :)
Since when is gravity zero in low earth orbit? It's not even zero at the moon's orbital distance, otherwise it wouldn't orbit the earth would it? Do you want the damn equation?
FYI gravity is only slightly lower at 300km orbit. Your other mistake is assuming space is a vacuum at 300km - it isn't. Look up the MSIS model for atmospheric density. Then consider aerodynamic drag.
Another mistake - an object who's altitude is 'peaking' is not stopping/reversing at all.
Correction. Sorry i got so bored with this basic physics crap i skipped from force to acceleration. Drag force depends upon frontal area and drag coefficient, and acceleration depends upon mass and Force (a=F/m). Basically a = (0.5 x air density x speed squared x drag coefficient x frontal area) / mass. Try RK4 integration of a particle in earth's grav field and ionosphere with a variety of parameters. End of!
@MoronAntidote So you're telling me that drag can make an object make a sudden turn? Unless the mechanics of drag up in space are different then it doesn't work that way.
You don't need all these mathetical equations to work out this stuff, you just need to understand it and common sense gives you the answer.
Again you're being arrogant and thinking that everyone knows about this stuff, with that attitude no one will listen to you, you're just a waste of space here.
Terrible memory! We've already established that trajectories are relative - a natural curve can look like a sharp turn from a certain angle, yet you forget.
Not one human on this planet can perform the necessary computations in their head, even when they understand the math. You don't even understand the math, yet you're so fucking arrogant that you actually believe you can just look at a video and do the work of a complex simulation program running on a modern computer. LOL
@MoronAntidote There you go again jumping to conclusions again. Show me some proof that an object can look like it's making a sudden turn when it's in fact, curving.
Go to a football field and get your friend to throw a ball from the same spot while you film it from different angles.
This is the most absurd question i have ever been asked. Seriously, if you don't understand HS physics, you have no right to even comment on a NASA video. What a fucking insult!
@MoronAntidote I don't have to do that, I've seen many things being thrown/kicked through the air with my own eyes and I've also seen many pieces of footage showing things being thrown/kicked and I have NEVER seen anything appear to make a sudden sharp turn, am I just unlucky and it happens to be a coincidence that something like that happens in this video?
Even if it's possible then I can't possibly get so many cameras to attempt it so can you provide any videos to prove it?
"Again you're being arrogant and thinking that everyone knows about this stuff"
On the contrary, i think it is clear that none you know anything about this stuff, and i can't for the life of me figure out why you thought i did. You're all fucking retards as far as i'm concerned, with the exception of the other posters who got systematically downrated just for trying to inject some reality into your cozy little censorship club. Truth? You can't handle it!
@MoronAntidote@MoronAntidote The way you express what you're saying makes you sound incredibly arrogant, that should have been quite obvious to someone as perfect as you but...Oh wait, I guess you're not as perfect as you make yourself out to be!
You're the one that can't handle the truth, again prove that your theory is correct, you can't can you? So why is everyone elses theory wrong?
And the way you express yourself makes you sound incredibly stupid.
Newton's and Kepler's laws are not my theories. I just happen to be able to apply them using RK4 integration in 3 dimensions (remember vectors?). Several decades of space missions and thousands of earth satellites are proof enough.
NASA's MSIS model of the atmosphere is online. Disprove it.
YOU NEED TO DISPROVE WELL-ESTABLISHED SCIENCE HERE!
@MoronAntidote Science has not proven that the objects in this video are debris and they cant prove it unless they go back in time and go right up to these objects to see exactly what they are. If they did that though then they'd find a couple of disc shaped objects occupied by alien beings, we'd still get the same old debris or ice particles excuse though
You also back up Newton's and Kepler's laws and present them in this video as fact for these objects we're seeing therefore it's your theory
It wasn't even a theory in 1996, so why should it be classed as one now? Just because a few uneducated people with over-active imaginations disagree with something doesn't call it into question. I wrote my own simulator, and it happens to verify the same behaviour NASA's simulator predicted years before STS-75 even took place. Disprove the simulations and the eye-witness accounts before you dare call any of this theory. You're challenging solid evidence with BS.
@MoronAntidote 11 months later...I can't be arsed debating this anymore, you aren't going to shut up, and I, nor anyone else, is going to change their mind.
@MoronAntidote It doesn't matter yet you're here arguing with everyone that believes differently to you? We're irrelevant yet you seem to care excessively about us? Now how about you do as you say in your own video and stfu? Rhetorical questions, don't reply, I know it's hard for you but you can do it, I have faith in you.
You're an ignorant fool with the arrogance to claim he knows better than thousands of scientists. What do you expect? I actually understand orbital mechanics, and i'm going to talk down to you. It's my right!
The accepted explanation remains unchallenged until you can denounce the very laws which placed hundreds of satellites into orbit. That's going to be pretty hard to do for an idiot like yourself as far as i'm concerned.
@MoronAntidote Why is it that every few weeks you reply to one of my comments made over a year ago and ignore my most recent? It'll be hard to denounce those laws for anyone, I think you're the idiot for even mentioning something as petty as that.
@MoronAntidote Didn't I already say I don't believe these are alien craft? I'm just saying there's a possibility, not everthing you see in the video acts the way debunkers describe. Theres dozens of NASA videos which may contain alien craft, it's easy to debunk the unknown, especially when it comes to space and the use of crappy cameras. So yeah I'm the arrogant and ignorant fool right? For believing in a possibility. I know we're being visited, but wether they're in this video who knows?
A belief without evidence is one thing (commonly known as faith).
Saying 'you know' without evidence is not acceptable, and never will be in a world which seeks understanding. Think about that, and how it fits in with the scientific method, without which we'd still be in the dark ages. This video wouldn't exist, neither would the internet, and we wouldn't have even met.
@MoronAntidote I honestly don't know why people are so bent against you here. You're putting up what seems to me to be solid science. I guess people want to believe that what they're seeing is supernatural rather than first looking for a rational answer in physics.
Thanks for your support, but this kind of response is typical on YT.
No understanding of math, physics, orbital mechanics or appreciation of the scientific method, coupled with poor reasoning ability and a tendency to only seek information from sources which reinforce existing (unfounded) beliefs, leads to complete and utter 'assholery'. Anyone who disagrees is censored, but it really makes no difference to human understanding. They will never contribute to science.
BTW when i first saw this video i was just as intrigued (and skeptical) as anyone else, but unlike the ignorant fools on here with little knowledge of math/physics i set about writing a simulator, just as NASA did so many years ago. I found that my own simulations verified the conclusions found in many online documents regarding this phenomenon. Clearly most people won't read or can't understand these documents, claiming NASA are liars by default, but that's just a cop-out.
This annoys me. This shouldn't be a Tether 'incident'. It's just the fact that our world governments think the notion of ETs is taboo and should be denied, but this footage poses a problem. The question is whether these are sizeable alien ships or perhaps space-dwelling lifeforms?
In the video, there is no point of reference. Sizes cannot be determined. The objects could be the size of grains of sand. The mission highlights mention the failed satellite tether and the experiments. It also mentions gas from satellite's thrusters interacting with ionosphere and plasma wakes created by a moving body through electrically-charged ionosphere. Maybe these are just tiny particles.
great software to see the velocity trails. I have seen this video and shown it to many friends. People try and tease me for being a believer, then i show them the Tether incident, that shuts them up pretty quickly! Nice work LunaCognita!
Naderholland. Next time, when you attempt to sound intelligent and arrogantly make an accusation that something is "fake"; first, learn how to spell! (what the hell is a "microps"?!)
Second, simply stating "fake" without presenting the slightest evidence, beside your inability to spell simple words, classifies you as a low grade, arrogant moron and that's pretty much a scientific fact >:)
"[there] is a plot against this enormously important & enormously serious interchange between the planets, to keep power for a limited number of people on this planet. It will be.. only for a limited time until... Maitreya is known & accepted, & then the reality of the UFOs will come out." Benjamin Creme
-------
--------
----------
-----------
Google "Benjamin Creme + space brothers" to read about the space brothers & their work on Earth.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
This looks like a phase contrast microscopy! It is not the original tape either...Their are filamentous or rod-like structures that are all over the place....They were not their in the original...Why would anyone do this????
It undermines those who are coming out with the truth!!!
Labmanjrb, Next time before you make an asinine comment, take a few minutes to research your so called facts.
These anomalies ARE in fact on the original video, this much can not be contested; the controversy/debate between the opposing schools of thought is what the anomalies are.
Bottom line: You're either a liar, disinformation or just another common YT fool who comments before doing the slightest bit of research.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@Abyyss3344 ..This particular video is full of shit...I have seen the original tether video and it did not have these filamentous phenomenons in it...I work ina laboratory and it looks justlike a phase microscope that sees bacteria or organisms placed underneath it....Dont give me crap about doing research on this cause I have and this is the only vid that has theses "filamentous" type abstracts on the tether incident video....how bout checking this video..and tell me if you see them
Hows my gov bitch doing still sucking the mans cock douchbag with your army of wankers plus marking your comments to make you look good. Got your number .
ya we got a looong way to go before we'll ever be up there cruisin with them... thats pretty amazing... looks like a super space freeway... immagine the road rage!!!
According to some comments other experts, they claim the alleged 'dust' is pulsating due to the objects being far away. However, if these are ice particles, or dust particles, and the IR camera that shows here is demonstrating such objects, they claim the pulsating is due to the distance being father than the IR camera can show, but if that's the case, then that debris is incredibly large. And since they claim that the objects are also closer, then they wouldn't pulse.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Nobody of any significance has ever claimed that the 'pulsation' has anything to do with distance. It has always been explained (rightly so) as a result of irregularly shaped objects tumbling through space (as they do), reflecting light at a cyclicly varying intensity dependent on rate of spin (as any sound-minded person would expect).
The camera was not IR or UV sensitive. It was an SIT Vidicon tube camera mounted in the payload bay, not the 'TOP' camera.
there's lots of them around the tether... and pulsing. And surprisingly, moving around the tether. Electromagnetic? How does it get powered if the tether severed? As far as we know, the STS-75 mission suffered a failure from an electric overload.
Perhaps this failure led to something more mysterious. Perhaps what we see isn't something we would commonly see.
And only trolls pretending to be professionals whine on YouTube. Go to a real community. Geez
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
They are not around the tether. They are close to the Shuttle.
The tether failed due to a puncture in its insulation, causing a short circuit. There was no overload, and no more than 1 ampere of current flowed during the short circuit. You should realise that this experiment produced about enough power to boil a decent kettle.
Nothing mysterious to anyone who actually takes the trouble to research the real facts, and more importantly, understand them (rare on YouTube).
Since a lot of, as MoronAntidote's mistake of misspelling "hypocrite" and being an obvious arsehole of a brit, hypocrites think that this is all dust and shit.
Since when does dust pulse in mid-space? What about water particles? The sun must be revolving around everything in the matter of 3 cycles per second or more if it's the reflection of the sun.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I fail to see how pointing out a spelling mistake gives you the right to talk complete rubbish on the subject.
Dust doesn't 'pulse' (whatever that means), it spins naturally, as anyone with any knowledge will tell you. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that randomly shaped particles with random rates of spin will present a cyclic variation in cross-sectional area with which to reflect sunlight, hence they will appear to pulsate (not pulse) according to their rate of spin etc.
Looks like UFO bugs or something. A sort of spying devices use by aliens to monitor other lifeforms and their activities. These can be seen on earth and are small in sizes compare to UFO and can fly like a bug.
MoronAntidote, do you ever stop whining? My dim witted friend, your so called theories are pathetically lacking. You twist or spin what you perceived as scientific fact in order to fit your delusional views. When you are confronted by those who intelligently counter and challenge your incoherent ranting, you become frightened & resort to insults like some poor scolded child having a tantrum. You're so upset people will not buy into your BS, it would be almost laughable if it wasn't so pathetic.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Firstly, you're a hypocrit, and secondly, i couldn't care less what you think of me. I am way passed caring about how i am perceived on here, when any attempt to reason with you people results in repeated downrating of posts until they become hidden. This happens no matter how civil i am. It happens no matter how scientifically or factually correct my posts are, so where is the incentive to be civil?
You've got some nerve mate.
This sad 'censorship' only occurs on this video. Be ashamed!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Sorry but i had to let know how much i enjoyed laughing at this:
"confronted by those who intelligently counter and challenge"
ROFL
FYI there have been no intelligent counter-arguments, only half-baked pseudo-scientific BS, bigotry and rampant censorship of posts. You're not interested in truth, only your version of it, but unlike me you're unable to back your claims scientifically. Free speech? You'd burn me at the stake if you had the chance. Pitiful.
You are a fucken idiot! I just wasted my time re-reading all your comments, just to see if you had a point... you did at first but your comments are condescending, rude & childish. YOU think that YOUR "THEORIES" are solid fact when they are just YOUR PERSONAL THEORIERS! YOU think that you're so far above everyone but you are so far below most here. I would bet you are nothing more than a 15 year punk, that gets made fun of each day in school as a know it all, know nothing, loser.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Oh look another hypocrit. Why don't you people ever consider your own behaviour before you attempt to judge others? Self awareness anyone?
Now go and do some 'proper' research, because you will find none if this is 'personal theory'. All i've done is verify through my own modelling what experts have known for years, and this video is supporting evidence.
It's like a school playground in here, with a few bullies running around hating and downrating everyone with a different point of view.
Newton's and Kepler's Laws are not my theories. When someone knows how to apply such laws, and you don't, you just get to sit in the corner with a big fucking hat on that reads "IDIOT".
Enjoy flipping your burgers kid, i've got cool stuff to design :P
MoronAntidote Holy blue fuck! Are you STILL crying!?? You are the most pathetic web stalker on YT! You have some serious issues. Every one of your comments have been laughed out of existence here because people can't stand your condescending, know-it-all BULLSHIT.. in yet you keep sneaking back here every other week just praying that some one, anyone will believe your shit. When you finally finish high school, come back here then; hopefully by that point you will stop whining like a little bitch
Holy blue fuck! Are you STILL crying? You are the most pathetic web stalker on YT! You have some serious issues. Every one of your comments have been laughed out of existence here because people can't stand your ignorant, know-nothing BULLSHIT, and yet you keep sneaking back here every other week just praying that someone, anyone will believe your shit. When you finally finish playschool, come back here then. Hopefully by that point you won't be such a cunt.
@MoronAntidote: I think you need help as well. You are extremely obsessive & you simply can't except that people here disagree with you & your very immature arrogance.
You're so obtuse that you can't comprehend why everyone is "thumbing down" your insulting comments. Your opinion is no better than anyone else but some how you fancy your OPINION to be the only possible right one, which is beyond arrogant, it's shameful.
Obsessed people like you wind up hurting others, that's the scary thing.
1) I completely accept that people disagree with me. I can't accept that people disagree without valid argument.
2) Ignorant uneducated people don't like being schooled. Thumbing down comments has no effect on the validity of a post, but it reveals a desire to censor information which threatens their self-constructed versions of reality. That's an own-goal.
Comment removed
CWBou812 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I know what are those objects: simple space debris seen prvilegiata position very close to the planes of their orbits.
The objects that seem to make the seemingly sudden curves can be explained by indipendent axial rotation that exposes the viewer to different portions of the surface of these objects thus causing the illusion of curves sudden.
zegalvis 1 month ago
Comment removed
zegalvis 1 month ago
Dinosaurs never existed... watch?v=a6GSdIr21JA
mustaffa1611 4 months ago
Not sure I understand your question, I apologize if I offended you for any reason. I checked out your videos, great site. Are you a photographer? I would like to understand your interpretation of the video, you may be able to add something for the other viewers as well. Was firstwave1 already taken...or are you the sequel?
adamacfile 5 months ago
Great video, thanks for taking the time and posting. Just wanted to say at the last during the tether mission, the objects that are scooting around the scene are out of focus debris, the lens used is a mirror type and creates a doughnut shape. This is a common phenomena with photography and mirror type lenses. The pulsing observed is the scan or refresh rate of the ccd camera, it looks amplified because the bits of debris are brightly lit and out of focus. We are not alone though.
adamacfile 5 months ago
@adamacfile Do you always suck shit from a straw .
firstwave2 5 months ago
Comment removed
adamacfile 5 months ago
There is a good explanation for this phenomena and I would probably agree with there findings. Check out this video. NASA STS-75 "Tether UFO" Video - Explained And Replicated
nelg70 7 months ago
Comment removed
nelg70 7 months ago
Idiots
chriscowman 7 months ago
Look up a video called " never doubt again" and tell me that's debris you moron.
roogdoog 9 months ago
Definatly space critters. The idea that there is no life in all that space but some on earth is silly. They may not be carbon based or need water or o2 but that dosnt mean anything.
roogdoog 9 months ago
the key to space flight, is anti gravity... so say good bye to all your theories moron. humans have yet to figure that out... obviously another life form has....
lordofthemoodring 9 months ago
This is nothing more than a magnification of a Chinese zoo's sperm bank from endanged panda's.
TRASUPO 9 months ago
Thats a shitload of alien spaceships flyin around there. Oh the petri dish that is our universe.
clbaumer 10 months ago
héhe_í_sigñed_up_ãt_fûll_tilt_pökêr
_úsïng_rëferräl_codë:_YOU600_ãnd_gøt_à_600_ÐØllar_bønüs
BradyPeggy285454 10 months ago
Oh ya. I think they are Space critters. Possibly a space equivalent of algae. I have nothing to back this up of course, however I believe It based on a little bit of observation. Theres nothing wrong with that. Its not like publishing a book on it. I just think thats what they look like. If I had to guess that'd be it.
roogdoog 10 months ago
@MoronAntidote Makes loads of points that deserve attention, however FreeworldPolitics makes the best one. It doesn't matter how any of them are moving in curved paths towards Earth. I think what matters is there is a pulsating, similar sized and shaped objects that are clearly not debris. I am not a scientist or professional anything and have next to zero understanding of space, much like all of you. So lets all stop pretending we "know" whats going on and start asking what others think it is.
roogdoog 10 months ago
@roogdoog
Actually it's a terrible point if you're trying to convince people that they're aliens. The fact that they look similar and pulsate is exactly what you'd expect to see if objects were nearfield and out of focus. All objects will take on an appearance determined by the lens design, and will appear to pulsate if they are not perfectly smooth/spherical but tumbling as inanimate always do in space.
It's just more evidence for out of focus debris.
MoronAntidote 9 months ago
what is the name of the first song? I love it!
Iciclesxo 10 months ago
Know this:
Those who present videos which track the trajectories of these objects do nothing more than discredit their own argument. They fail to spot the fact that every single object which changes trajectory (as expected and predicted by virtue of simple orbital mechanics), only does so once, and the final trajectory is always in the direction of earth (which can be verified via unedited footage). It is not logical to suppose that controlled craft behave this way without exception.
MoronAntidote 10 months ago
Q1 Who thinks objects should travel in straight lines wherever they are in space?
Q2 Who thinks space is a total vacuum at shuttle orbital altitude?
Q3 Who hasn't realised that the absence of a total vacuum causes relative changes in trajectory depending upon mass, drag coefficient and surface area?
Q4 Who hasn't realised that a camera filming from a platform weighing 10s of tons viewing objects weighing grammes, will inevitably record predictable curved trajectories?
Yes to any = FAIL!
MoronAntidote 10 months ago
Is it just me or does this look like a nail in water?
TheMummysClub 10 months ago
Remember people, the objects that are moving AREN'T moving on a 2D plane, a lot that you see will could me moving toward or away from the camera and it wouldn't be noticeable due to the over-exposure.
nurikosguardian 11 months ago
I believe that the rods and the orbs or UFOs are data collecting drones. They fly around the con or chem. Trails and in this case to collect information for the government. I have seen them behind large thunder storms before. But that is my opinion, go to Merced Cal. You get a good look at the rods and the orbs. As many as 40 at one time, you will need to watch closely they fly very fast. You will see them though.
wolkenw55 1 year ago
watch this video, it is really important, these things are not craft they are living entities.
Bill Ryan Project Avalon Rulers of the World 1 January 2011 clip8
this whole interview will make you numb with realization.
shevi04 1 year ago
these are lively creations from the energy so also NASA knows about this from the beginning these are powerful messengers which check this what is up the man that in case of troubles to know as to neutralize human weapons. Jesus taught schoolboys to pray " come Your " Kingdom all they know this request , what does she refer ? in the book Daniela 2 : 44 is the answer ! she is not the mile for politicians and these rule ! . Whether she is not as for days of Noah ?
MrLosshenrykos 1 year ago
these are lively creations from the energy so also NASA knows about this from the beginning these are powerful messengers which check this what is up the man that in case of troubles to know as to neutralize human weapons.
MrLosshenrykos 1 year ago
Wow there is alot of profanity on this site why is that? If these people wish to publish something "fake"this is Youboob" so what? If they want to publish something genuine so what? This is Youboob and you can video anything you want, period. Now when you go to the grocery store and pick up supplies for the whole week you don't start screaming at the "cashier or Grocery clerk" why is all this stuff here WTF?" Hope you don't anyway! Take what you need and move along that's all dude!
yetibiker08 1 year ago
What alot of you people might want to do before making yourselves seem foolish is check here [space-video.info/shuttle/columbia-sts75] and if that doesnt help you may want to check YouTuber secretnasaman to compare this footage against many others. Hope this helps...
FreeWorldPolitics 1 year ago
@FreeWorldPolitics
Secretnasaman is a nice enough guy, but he's a complete idiot when it comes to science.
He lives in his own world where personal beliefs are all that matters. He has no concept of orbital mechanics, which is why he believes any spec of light which doesn't travel in a straight line in space must be some kind of craft. Ironically, he should be looking for objects which do travel in straight lines, because that requires controlled propulsion within earth's grav. field.
MoronAntidote 10 months ago
@MoronAntidote Fair enough man, but there are a few he has that are clearly circular discs like the ones shown above with the footage quality looking similar, which was my point. Peace
FreeWorldPolitics 10 months ago
@LunaCognita
why do you declare a vid of some boring bacterias moving in front of a microscope as an alien-fotage ?
Flummmmmmi 1 year ago
@Flummmmmmi auhuah uahua you are all right.. but it seems that other vids are confirming these objects have been seen in space. maybe that is why we navigate the space and we also find JELLY FISHES :) IoI
elevenby2 1 year ago
Comment removed
Flummmmmmi 1 year ago
It looks like yur looking through a microscope. And those things look like some kind of organisms.
HemiHead66 1 year ago
Is this supposed to be footage from space? Looks like particles and bacteria through a microscope:O
Furaxxxxx 1 year ago
@Furaxxxxx Yes, I know, you noticed that? It almost looks like they are swimming in space. One possibility is that this was filmed deep in the ocean, and it could also mean beings swim in space you could say.
I know this seems weird, but when you move your arms and legs, that wind, almost feels like water.
leovraiel 1 year ago
@leovraiel you are all right.. I made the almost the same comment on those unidentified object seen from shuttle mission that look like jelly fish :) IoI
elevenby2 1 year ago
@Furaxxxxx well .. infact at 2:35 when it is in black an white you can see these bacteria from inside the windows on the borders of the vid.... kind of weird!
elevenby2 1 year ago
And now they (NASA) are telling us, all out, that they've "discovered" a new habitable exo-planet!!! Wooohooo! Really old news from 2007, and actually they didn't came up with anything new ever since.
Instead of spending their money on really interesting stuff, like these, they (NASA) keep spending their money on disinformation... slightly disappointing ;-)
Obama may cut the budget to absolute zero on this Werner von Braun scam project. Who is Werner von Braun... look 'm up on wikipedia! LOL
ArnoldVeeman 1 year ago
Space is a vaccuum...but there are minute dust particles in space as well. My guess is that light pressure from the lamp on the tether is moving the dust particles. Note that the curved motions are in-synch when they reach what would be the "center" of the frame. Thoughts?
Archangel72467 1 year ago
@Archangel72467
Hahahaha! What lamp? That is stray light from the sun that causes this image. And the "particles" cannot be affected like this in any way! Not in the vacuum, nor like this autonomous moves. For there would be a whole bunch of light and fans out there!
Oh, and "some" (read: the most) off centred "particles aren't in synch at all...
ArnoldVeeman 1 year ago
@Archangel72467
Space is not a total vacuum at shuttle altitudes.
That's assumption failure #1.
Look up the MSIS model, then consider how objects of different mass and drag coefficient behave in non-zero drag at ~17000mph, in the presence of earth's gravity.
Assumption failure #2 is that objects should travel in straight lines in space. Does the moon? Does the shuttle? Only an object with infinite velocity can travel in a straight line in the presence of earth's gravity.
Think!
MoronAntidote 10 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i think this is a whole bunch of crab they are trying to feed to people, even if these are the real ufo shit, why are they driving through each other, what kind of stiuped planet did they get their driving licence from hahaha, i think you people should go and pray to God more, and have some faith....sitting on your asses and making up boulshits and wors than that is that you fight each other over it too, i have a ufo in my pants, you wanna picture of it loosers??!!
shokoraz 1 year ago
damn aliens. show ur selves god damn it~~~~!!!!
TimingIsEvrytng 1 year ago
@TimingIsEvrytng you probly wouldnt be able to handle it
John7Shepard 1 year ago
@John7Shepard sure i will. got nothing to lose
TimingIsEvrytng 1 year ago
O_O they change directions? Free floating things in space do NOT do that!
GlamorousDarkness 1 year ago
Never doubt again, there here, they excist, there waiting, there watching, there listening :-)
forfaksake 1 year ago
At 1:20 look at the 5 brightest objects forming the pentagon shape, follow these on the actual footage and observe the similarities in speed and direction before and after zooming in/out. Also take note the direction the tether moves before and after, the directions are not what they should be for natural objects. There are also many faint objects within and outside the pentagon that have the same behaviour, most of the objects are within the pentagon. Coincidence? Camera trick?
Ezriel54 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Microscope!!
regfox2000 1 year ago
@regfox2000 NO bodys going to believe your explaination. if they do then they are stupid. i take it you have seen the original footage? thats REAL NASA footage taken from space, EVERYONE knows that much. this is the same footage but just shows the flight paths of the UFO'S. i have herd some strange explainations but thats got to be the worst yet.
019208237 1 year ago
This is just the view under a microscope!!
regfox2000 1 year ago
@regfox2000 SAID: "This is just the view under a microscope!!"
Come up with that epiphany all by your little self, did ya? Wow, we have ourselves another genius people and to think that even NASA didn't release they were recording movements from a petri dish, that's before Regfox figured it all out & he didn't even need to research it like the rest of us! (sarc)
You're a Moron! Even the intelligent skeptics do not contest the fact that this video was from NASA's STS-75 mission, u fool!
Abyyss3344 1 year ago 5
@regfox The only thing that involves a "microscope" around here, is using one to find your brain! Do some damn research next time before simply blurting shit out.
Arrogantly saying "just a microscope view" or the like, proves you're a big mouth know-it-all who really knows 0. What makes you pathetic, is how you're to frigging lazy to read all the other comments, as if you're better than everyone & don't need to waste your time because laughably you think no one else thought of it before you lol
Xwhere 1 year ago 7
@Xwhere LOL you beat me to it ;-)
019208237 1 year ago
i am utterly amazed ...... there is NO,,explaination ... wow .......shazam1059
shazam1059 1 year ago
is this a hoax,you better think twice!
this is the realthing people.
hahahahahaha,to all those debunkers and sceptics.
don't fall of your chairs and DON'T MAKE ACCIDENTS ON THE ROAD WHEN YOU SEE THEM FLYING OVER IN THE SKY ABOVE YOU,WATCH OUT FOR THE PEOPLE AND THE TRAFFIC ON THE ROAD PLS!!!!
WE NEED ALL FOR A BETTER WORLD.
ALMOST THERE PEOPLE,LOOK DEEP IN TO YOUR HEART YOU KNOW WHAT YOU FEEL.
IF NOT IT'S COMMING,JUST OPEN YOUR EYES PEOPLE
GRTZ FROM ROEL: FROM HOLLAND.
roelof37 1 year ago
fantastic video, thanks~!
maha77 1 year ago
well, this older one is well enough for understanding what was happening out there at that time... tnx a lot for posting this.
Peace
deimos2k6 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
MoronAntidote - Congratulations on your ONE MILLION debunker posts!!!! This is for your recognition to the cause!.....
┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐
loucanola 1 year ago
Can you say what I'm looking at exactly? I don't know what it is... but at times it looks like I'm looking at a recording of a petri dish under a high rez microscope. lol I could be wrong. Your vids about the moon are... intriguing, to say the least.
om3ga123 1 year ago
@om3ga123 look up the tether incident, to me its the best proof of UFO's
77avt 1 year ago
@om3ga123 Omega, This is a video of "objects" "flying" by a detached TETHER from the Space Station. The Tether is actually several MILES long, and is drifting away into space. They decided, since we fucked up and let this thing loose let's at least film it!
However....The lens does NOT explain how these objects change trajectory. I have renewed interest in this now
pdderek 1 year ago
@pdderek
Yeah I've looked into this since posting and have noticed how the objects change trajectory. At first I thought it was debris or dust even but it's very strange how they change direction... intriguing indeed.
om3ga123 1 year ago
At 0:59 look at the 4 brightest objects on the left of the screen and above the tether, they all look exactly the same and if you draw a line between them all and what shape do you get? Check a video showing the whole footage and drag the time bar along and you see them moving at the same speed in the same direction until the camera zooms in, when the camera zooms out again drag the bar further and you'll see that they're moving in the opposite direction at same speed still, debris coincidence?
Ezriel54 1 year ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@Ezriel54
You need to specify a video for this.
Unlike you, i'm honest about things and will request a valid frame of reference before commenting.
MoronAntidote 1 year ago
MoronAntidote Your going to report me? My video? LOL You're a FUCKEN RETARD! Youre such a pathetic low grade moron that you ASSUME EVERYTHING but have no proof of ANYTHING! By all means, have some fucking balls & PLEASE REPORT me, tell youtube that, in your paranoid twisted head that you "think" I'm the OP of this video! They will wind up finally banning you for all your spam & fucked up "assumptions"!
Everyone hates you & your foolish theories, that's why your comments are flagged, fool!
AlexJonezChannel 1 year ago 6
This has been flagged as spam show
@MoronAntidote "You need to specify a video for this.
Unlike you, i'm honest about things and will request a valid frame of reference before commenting."
You've lost me.
Ezriel54 1 year ago
some one sounds of an easy kill with can swim for it or make they own,
then some should at lest touch a first gov. gov web sight for 6 hrs or more
your anger is that of persons whom seek conflict an well i given you a broken end of life,
SOWHATIMADEIT 1 year ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@SOWHATIMADEIT
What did he say?
MoronAntidote 1 year ago
Moronantidote is the perfect example of why youTube needs to invent a method to rid this place of 13yr old know it all punks! Some 1 here said it best: your so called "facts" are nothing more than personal assumptions & theories, no better than the next guy. Who the fuck appointed you the God of knowledge and who are you to make fun of other people's theories or to say others are wrong, fuck u! I can only imagine how many times you get your punk ass handed to you in the real world.
fckthecowards 1 year ago 16
This has been flagged as spam show
@fckthecowards
Tell that to Newton and Kepler. Oh sorry, you can't because they're both dead. How ironic that you are not familiar with the works of such influential people, yet see fit to insult someone in their 40's who is. Not even the slightest hint of intelligence or respect for physics in your post, yet you accuse a stranger of being 13 years old. Go home, apologise to your parents and jump out of the fusking window. You are no use to this world kid.
MoronAntidote 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@fckthecowards
Now say something that actually challenges anything i've said coward.
MoronAntidote 9 months ago
tether incident: Have u ever seen dust flying through a sunbeam shining into your room ? i bet u did... THATS the tether incident !! call me a genius
Geistertramper 1 year ago
this is footage from space.. its not a fucking petry dish
30secondstomarscam 1 year ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Oh look, not one single object changes direction more than once. Hmm, i wonder why that could be? Woah they all eventually turn towards earth's center of gravity! Now that's interesting isn't it? I know, let's assume they're alien craft that have all lost propulsion and are therefore forced to obey the laws of orbital mechanics. Yeah that'll do it.
ROFL
MoronAntidote 1 year ago
@MoronAntidote Look at 3:08, an object at the top has turned slightly to the right while maintaining an eastern direction instead of south (Towards Earth's centre of gravity) like the rest and continues heading in the same direction, as far as I know gravity doesn't work like that.
Ezriel54 1 year ago 8
This has been flagged as spam show
@Ezriel54
So you think gravity is the only influential factor? Why?
You know there's still an atmosphere at this altitude yes?
What force does that impose?
And what does that force depend upon?
Mass, frontal area and drag coefficient!
Clue - not all particles will have the same mass, area and drag coeff., plus distance and trajectory w.r.t. camera vary.
Do the math and get back to me :)
MoronAntidote 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MoronAntidote
You cannot possibly get to grips with this without math. Attempting to do so will get you nowhere.
I don't know why you bother anyway. Not one single object changes direction more than once, and every change is towards earth. That's enough to make any retard think twice, even if they can't get to grips with the math.
MoronAntidote 1 year ago
@MoronAntidote Also what's your point in saying that no object changes direction more than once? Are you suggesting that intelligently controlled craft would turn multiple times?
Ezriel54 1 year ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@Ezriel54
Are you suggesting that dozens of supposed intelligently controlled craft should simply follow well established physical laws by all turning towards earth? Why would they do that if they were intelligently controlled? For god's sake think man! Are you suggesting that dozens of alien craft simultaneously lost propulsion, just so you can claim that a single turn is expected? Utterly absurd!
MoronAntidote 1 year ago
@MoronAntidote Now you're thinking that I believe all these things are craft lol, you're the one with terrible memory here, I've already told you that I believe most of it is debris.
There are plenty of objects that don't turn too and some that appear to be stationary.
Ezriel54 1 year ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@Ezriel54
Oh i remember what you said. The problem was that you said that only 'most of it was debris'. At that point you became a target for ridicule, most likely about to invoke witchcraft, pseudo-science or paranormal shite. I was right!
Ice clouds expand in all directions after sublimation in space - well known fact. So ice can have various trajectories w.r.t. the camera. It's not all ice, and some objects are stars. Why should all objects behave the same for christ's sake?
MoronAntidote 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@MoronAntidote
You're still dodging the fact that none of them change direction more than once, and that they all head towards earth. This is proof enough, but i'll humour you for a while longer since i enjoy laughing at your ignorance.
MoronAntidote 1 year ago
@MoronAntidote I alread pointed out that the object that makes a sudden, sharp turn head away from Earth, to expand to that - everything else that makes a turn curves naturally as they should and heads towards Earth, they don't turn slightly then carry on going straight.
Ezriel54 1 year ago
@Ezriel54 Things don't "naturally" curve in space. They follow a straight path until encountering gravity, intense radiation, or another object. If you're suggesting the movements taken by these objects is dictated by the earth then all angles should be almost identical and ALL objects (on same trajectories) ought to behave as all others do.
What are the chances that these objects are reaching Earth's gravity and TURNING right there...practically none. FAIL
pdderek 1 year ago
@pdderek You've got it wrong, it was MoronAntidote saying that stuff, I don't know much about the laws of gravity up there or anything else so I won't comment on it but I'll comment on what's obvious and you seem to have misinterpreted it. Read my comments in light of MoronAntidote's and you'll see :)
Ezriel54 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@pdderek
Says who?
Since when is gravity zero in low earth orbit? It's not even zero at the moon's orbital distance, otherwise it wouldn't orbit the earth would it? Do you want the damn equation?
FYI gravity is only slightly lower at 300km orbit. Your other mistake is assuming space is a vacuum at 300km - it isn't. Look up the MSIS model for atmospheric density. Then consider aerodynamic drag.
Another mistake - an object who's altitude is 'peaking' is not stopping/reversing at all.
MoronAntidote 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@MoronAntidote
You'd have been correct if you said 'objects cannot travel in straight lines in low earth orbit without propulsion/control'.
You're presenting the opposite as a case for ET, which is absurd. Read some books for fuck's sake.
MoronAntidote 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MoronAntidote - Congratulations on your ONE MILLION debunker posts!!!! This is for your recognition to the cause!.....
┌∩┐(◕_◕)┌∩┐
loucanola 1 year ago
@Ezriel54 Look at 1:23 or so...One of these objects makes a COMPLETE 180 (ok, almost complete)
Are you saying at THAT MOMENT that object reached it's perigree and TURNED AROUND back toward earth in it's orbit?
Hell no. Zero chance. Keep trying
pdderek 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MoronAntidote
Correction. Sorry i got so bored with this basic physics crap i skipped from force to acceleration. Drag force depends upon frontal area and drag coefficient, and acceleration depends upon mass and Force (a=F/m). Basically a = (0.5 x air density x speed squared x drag coefficient x frontal area) / mass. Try RK4 integration of a particle in earth's grav field and ionosphere with a variety of parameters. End of!
MoronAntidote 1 year ago
@MoronAntidote So you're telling me that drag can make an object make a sudden turn? Unless the mechanics of drag up in space are different then it doesn't work that way.
You don't need all these mathetical equations to work out this stuff, you just need to understand it and common sense gives you the answer.
Again you're being arrogant and thinking that everyone knows about this stuff, with that attitude no one will listen to you, you're just a waste of space here.
Ezriel54 1 year ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@Ezriel54
Terrible memory! We've already established that trajectories are relative - a natural curve can look like a sharp turn from a certain angle, yet you forget.
Not one human on this planet can perform the necessary computations in their head, even when they understand the math. You don't even understand the math, yet you're so fucking arrogant that you actually believe you can just look at a video and do the work of a complex simulation program running on a modern computer. LOL
MoronAntidote 1 year ago
@MoronAntidote There you go again jumping to conclusions again. Show me some proof that an object can look like it's making a sudden turn when it's in fact, curving.
Ezriel54 1 year ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@Ezriel54
Go to a football field and get your friend to throw a ball from the same spot while you film it from different angles.
This is the most absurd question i have ever been asked. Seriously, if you don't understand HS physics, you have no right to even comment on a NASA video. What a fucking insult!
NO PROOF REQUIRED!
MoronAntidote 1 year ago
@MoronAntidote I don't have to do that, I've seen many things being thrown/kicked through the air with my own eyes and I've also seen many pieces of footage showing things being thrown/kicked and I have NEVER seen anything appear to make a sudden sharp turn, am I just unlucky and it happens to be a coincidence that something like that happens in this video?
Even if it's possible then I can't possibly get so many cameras to attempt it so can you provide any videos to prove it?
Ezriel54 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@Ezriel54
"Again you're being arrogant and thinking that everyone knows about this stuff"
On the contrary, i think it is clear that none you know anything about this stuff, and i can't for the life of me figure out why you thought i did. You're all fucking retards as far as i'm concerned, with the exception of the other posters who got systematically downrated just for trying to inject some reality into your cozy little censorship club. Truth? You can't handle it!
MoronAntidote 1 year ago
@MoronAntidote @MoronAntidote The way you express what you're saying makes you sound incredibly arrogant, that should have been quite obvious to someone as perfect as you but...Oh wait, I guess you're not as perfect as you make yourself out to be!
You're the one that can't handle the truth, again prove that your theory is correct, you can't can you? So why is everyone elses theory wrong?
Ezriel54 1 year ago 10
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@Ezriel54
And the way you express yourself makes you sound incredibly stupid.
Newton's and Kepler's laws are not my theories. I just happen to be able to apply them using RK4 integration in 3 dimensions (remember vectors?). Several decades of space missions and thousands of earth satellites are proof enough.
NASA's MSIS model of the atmosphere is online. Disprove it.
YOU NEED TO DISPROVE WELL-ESTABLISHED SCIENCE HERE!
MoronAntidote 1 year ago
@MoronAntidote Science has not proven that the objects in this video are debris and they cant prove it unless they go back in time and go right up to these objects to see exactly what they are. If they did that though then they'd find a couple of disc shaped objects occupied by alien beings, we'd still get the same old debris or ice particles excuse though
You also back up Newton's and Kepler's laws and present them in this video as fact for these objects we're seeing therefore it's your theory
Ezriel54 1 year ago
@Ezriel54
What theory?
It wasn't even a theory in 1996, so why should it be classed as one now? Just because a few uneducated people with over-active imaginations disagree with something doesn't call it into question. I wrote my own simulator, and it happens to verify the same behaviour NASA's simulator predicted years before STS-75 even took place. Disprove the simulations and the eye-witness accounts before you dare call any of this theory. You're challenging solid evidence with BS.
MoronAntidote 9 months ago
@MoronAntidote 11 months later...I can't be arsed debating this anymore, you aren't going to shut up, and I, nor anyone else, is going to change their mind.
Ezriel54 9 months ago
@Ezriel54
It doesn't matter what a few idiots on YT and conspiracy sites think. You/they are irrelevant.
MoronAntidote 8 months ago
@MoronAntidote It doesn't matter yet you're here arguing with everyone that believes differently to you? We're irrelevant yet you seem to care excessively about us? Now how about you do as you say in your own video and stfu? Rhetorical questions, don't reply, I know it's hard for you but you can do it, I have faith in you.
Ezriel54 8 months ago
@Ezriel54
What i can prove:
1) The movement is predictable based on the well established laws of orbital mechanics (Kepler etc) and knowledge of ionospheric density;
2) The objects are within a few meters of the camera;
3) The notched/pulsating appearance of the objects is the result of camera lens design coupled with nearfield out of focus particles;
4) The camera was a low-tech SIT Vidicon tube device with image intensifier (mission logs indicate defects).
You can prove nothing.
MoronAntidote 8 months ago
What is a Tether Incident?
tnguyen318 8 months ago
@Ezriel54
I don't care if i sound arrogant!
You're an ignorant fool with the arrogance to claim he knows better than thousands of scientists. What do you expect? I actually understand orbital mechanics, and i'm going to talk down to you. It's my right!
The accepted explanation remains unchallenged until you can denounce the very laws which placed hundreds of satellites into orbit. That's going to be pretty hard to do for an idiot like yourself as far as i'm concerned.
MoronAntidote 8 months ago
@MoronAntidote Why is it that every few weeks you reply to one of my comments made over a year ago and ignore my most recent? It'll be hard to denounce those laws for anyone, I think you're the idiot for even mentioning something as petty as that.
Ezriel54 8 months ago
@MoronAntidote Didn't I already say I don't believe these are alien craft? I'm just saying there's a possibility, not everthing you see in the video acts the way debunkers describe. Theres dozens of NASA videos which may contain alien craft, it's easy to debunk the unknown, especially when it comes to space and the use of crappy cameras. So yeah I'm the arrogant and ignorant fool right? For believing in a possibility. I know we're being visited, but wether they're in this video who knows?
Ezriel54 8 months ago
@Ezriel54
So you believe in a possibility without evidence.
Then you say 'you know' we're being visited!
A belief without evidence is one thing (commonly known as faith).
Saying 'you know' without evidence is not acceptable, and never will be in a world which seeks understanding. Think about that, and how it fits in with the scientific method, without which we'd still be in the dark ages. This video wouldn't exist, neither would the internet, and we wouldn't have even met.
MoronAntidote 6 months ago
@MoronAntidote I honestly don't know why people are so bent against you here. You're putting up what seems to me to be solid science. I guess people want to believe that what they're seeing is supernatural rather than first looking for a rational answer in physics.
nurikosguardian 11 months ago
Comment removed
MoronAntidote 10 months ago
@nurikosguardian
Thanks for your support, but this kind of response is typical on YT.
No understanding of math, physics, orbital mechanics or appreciation of the scientific method, coupled with poor reasoning ability and a tendency to only seek information from sources which reinforce existing (unfounded) beliefs, leads to complete and utter 'assholery'. Anyone who disagrees is censored, but it really makes no difference to human understanding. They will never contribute to science.
MoronAntidote 10 months ago
@nurikosguardian
BTW when i first saw this video i was just as intrigued (and skeptical) as anyone else, but unlike the ignorant fools on here with little knowledge of math/physics i set about writing a simulator, just as NASA did so many years ago. I found that my own simulations verified the conclusions found in many online documents regarding this phenomenon. Clearly most people won't read or can't understand these documents, claiming NASA are liars by default, but that's just a cop-out.
MoronAntidote 10 months ago
This annoys me. This shouldn't be a Tether 'incident'. It's just the fact that our world governments think the notion of ETs is taboo and should be denied, but this footage poses a problem. The question is whether these are sizeable alien ships or perhaps space-dwelling lifeforms?
MrMorg19 1 year ago 5
@MrMorg19 life cant survive in space theres no air and the suns radiation would kill anything living out there. plus the super cold conditions,
30secondstomarscam 1 year ago
son microbios no ovnis
carlosislvamexdf 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
it looks like microscope shit not ufo's can you prove thats not under a microscope cause it looks like dna and sperm!
kmitchem4 1 year ago
para bens manim, vc talvez derrube os céticos...
:)
xavecostiago 1 year ago
The explaination is
"It's just a little dust which flies with us"
Looks like a sperm sample.
bikemech121 1 year ago
Nice. Comments that you don't agree with you flag as spam? I only made one post (now two) and in direct response to the video.
How do you expect visitors and posters to give you any respect if you disrespect them? You lose credibility by doing so, in my opinion.
GusJonesable 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In the video, there is no point of reference. Sizes cannot be determined. The objects could be the size of grains of sand. The mission highlights mention the failed satellite tether and the experiments. It also mentions gas from satellite's thrusters interacting with ionosphere and plasma wakes created by a moving body through electrically-charged ionosphere. Maybe these are just tiny particles.
GusJonesable 1 year ago 2
excellent work here. thank you for putting in so much time in order to produce this investigation of the tether incident!
NatashasCorner 1 year ago 4
great software to see the velocity trails. I have seen this video and shown it to many friends. People try and tease me for being a believer, then i show them the Tether incident, that shuts them up pretty quickly! Nice work LunaCognita!
kitewing 1 year ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this fake this is microps under the microscoop.
naderholland 1 year ago
Naderholland. Next time, when you attempt to sound intelligent and arrogantly make an accusation that something is "fake"; first, learn how to spell! (what the hell is a "microps"?!)
Second, simply stating "fake" without presenting the slightest evidence, beside your inability to spell simple words, classifies you as a low grade, arrogant moron and that's pretty much a scientific fact >:)
bandofthehand 1 year ago 10
LorDCarlSagan you are 100% rigth!!!!
This track shows impossible movements of so-called ice particles or space debris.Debris got own straight way on geostacionary orbit
THATS IS THE TRUE!!!!!
sputnick21 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You should check out "NASA TETHER BACKGROUND COMMUNICATION" .It exposes the faint background talking going on at Mission control.very impressive.
DoityDeEmunz 2 years ago
skyfish in space
venison13 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
"[there] is a plot against this enormously important & enormously serious interchange between the planets, to keep power for a limited number of people on this planet. It will be.. only for a limited time until... Maitreya is known & accepted, & then the reality of the UFOs will come out." Benjamin Creme
-------
--------
----------
-----------
Google "Benjamin Creme + space brothers" to read about the space brothers & their work on Earth.
goodquotz 2 years ago
wow!! what ARE those things?? the little guys that create "worm-holes" in space??:-)
angelpbj 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This looks like a phase contrast microscopy! It is not the original tape either...Their are filamentous or rod-like structures that are all over the place....They were not their in the original...Why would anyone do this????
It undermines those who are coming out with the truth!!!
labmanjrb69 2 years ago
Labmanjrb, Next time before you make an asinine comment, take a few minutes to research your so called facts.
These anomalies ARE in fact on the original video, this much can not be contested; the controversy/debate between the opposing schools of thought is what the anomalies are.
Bottom line: You're either a liar, disinformation or just another common YT fool who comments before doing the slightest bit of research.
Abyyss3344 2 years ago 22
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@Abyyss3344 ..This particular video is full of shit...I have seen the original tether video and it did not have these filamentous phenomenons in it...I work ina laboratory and it looks justlike a phase microscope that sees bacteria or organisms placed underneath it....Dont give me crap about doing research on this cause I have and this is the only vid that has theses "filamentous" type abstracts on the tether incident video....how bout checking this video..and tell me if you see them
labmanjrb69 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hows my gov bitch doing still sucking the mans cock douchbag with your army of wankers plus marking your comments to make you look good. Got your number .
speeder757 2 years ago
1:40-1:50/ 3:37-3:44 This track shows impossible movements of so-called ice
particles or space debris.Debris got own straight way on geostacionary orbit,
only thrusters can change its direction
and ice particles?
LordCarlSagan 2 years ago 7
Some of them are proven BEHIND the Tether, very large ice
particles floating around Tether..making formations(STS-80)etc etc
LordCarlSagan 2 years ago 2
ya we got a looong way to go before we'll ever be up there cruisin with them... thats pretty amazing... looks like a super space freeway... immagine the road rage!!!
donchonalucci 2 years ago 2
Ufos eXizt*
The truth is Out theRe!
maxxsee 2 years ago
Ufos Exizt*
*They are HeRe*
maxxsee 2 years ago
Is this presentation from an official source? A link to this in Nasa archives would be great!
FunkyAnelka 2 years ago
According to some comments other experts, they claim the alleged 'dust' is pulsating due to the objects being far away. However, if these are ice particles, or dust particles, and the IR camera that shows here is demonstrating such objects, they claim the pulsating is due to the distance being father than the IR camera can show, but if that's the case, then that debris is incredibly large. And since they claim that the objects are also closer, then they wouldn't pulse.
Something's fishy.
ArcanineKing 2 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Nobody of any significance has ever claimed that the 'pulsation' has anything to do with distance. It has always been explained (rightly so) as a result of irregularly shaped objects tumbling through space (as they do), reflecting light at a cyclicly varying intensity dependent on rate of spin (as any sound-minded person would expect).
The camera was not IR or UV sensitive. It was an SIT Vidicon tube camera mounted in the payload bay, not the 'TOP' camera.
You know nothing.
Jog on.
MoronAntidote 2 years ago
However, is this is satellite lighting...
there's lots of them around the tether... and pulsing. And surprisingly, moving around the tether. Electromagnetic? How does it get powered if the tether severed? As far as we know, the STS-75 mission suffered a failure from an electric overload.
Perhaps this failure led to something more mysterious. Perhaps what we see isn't something we would commonly see.
And only trolls pretending to be professionals whine on YouTube. Go to a real community. Geez
ArcanineKing 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
They are not around the tether. They are close to the Shuttle.
The tether failed due to a puncture in its insulation, causing a short circuit. There was no overload, and no more than 1 ampere of current flowed during the short circuit. You should realise that this experiment produced about enough power to boil a decent kettle.
Nothing mysterious to anyone who actually takes the trouble to research the real facts, and more importantly, understand them (rare on YouTube).
MoronAntidote 2 years ago
Okay.
Since a lot of, as MoronAntidote's mistake of misspelling "hypocrite" and being an obvious arsehole of a brit, hypocrites think that this is all dust and shit.
Since when does dust pulse in mid-space? What about water particles? The sun must be revolving around everything in the matter of 3 cycles per second or more if it's the reflection of the sun.
ArcanineKing 2 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I fail to see how pointing out a spelling mistake gives you the right to talk complete rubbish on the subject.
Dust doesn't 'pulse' (whatever that means), it spins naturally, as anyone with any knowledge will tell you. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that randomly shaped particles with random rates of spin will present a cyclic variation in cross-sectional area with which to reflect sunlight, hence they will appear to pulsate (not pulse) according to their rate of spin etc.
MoronAntidote 2 years ago
Looks like UFO bugs or something. A sort of spying devices use by aliens to monitor other lifeforms and their activities. These can be seen on earth and are small in sizes compare to UFO and can fly like a bug.
switch2unlimited 2 years ago 5
MoronAntidote, do you ever stop whining? My dim witted friend, your so called theories are pathetically lacking. You twist or spin what you perceived as scientific fact in order to fit your delusional views. When you are confronted by those who intelligently counter and challenge your incoherent ranting, you become frightened & resort to insults like some poor scolded child having a tantrum. You're so upset people will not buy into your BS, it would be almost laughable if it wasn't so pathetic.
Abyyss3344 2 years ago 18
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Firstly, you're a hypocrit, and secondly, i couldn't care less what you think of me. I am way passed caring about how i am perceived on here, when any attempt to reason with you people results in repeated downrating of posts until they become hidden. This happens no matter how civil i am. It happens no matter how scientifically or factually correct my posts are, so where is the incentive to be civil?
You've got some nerve mate.
This sad 'censorship' only occurs on this video. Be ashamed!
MoronAntidote 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Sorry but i had to let know how much i enjoyed laughing at this:
"confronted by those who intelligently counter and challenge"
ROFL
FYI there have been no intelligent counter-arguments, only half-baked pseudo-scientific BS, bigotry and rampant censorship of posts. You're not interested in truth, only your version of it, but unlike me you're unable to back your claims scientifically. Free speech? You'd burn me at the stake if you had the chance. Pitiful.
Downrating it is then :P
MoronAntidote 2 years ago
MoronAntidote.
You are a fucken idiot! I just wasted my time re-reading all your comments, just to see if you had a point... you did at first but your comments are condescending, rude & childish. YOU think that YOUR "THEORIES" are solid fact when they are just YOUR PERSONAL THEORIERS! YOU think that you're so far above everyone but you are so far below most here. I would bet you are nothing more than a 15 year punk, that gets made fun of each day in school as a know it all, know nothing, loser.
AlexJonezChannel 2 years ago 61
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Oh look another hypocrit. Why don't you people ever consider your own behaviour before you attempt to judge others? Self awareness anyone?
Now go and do some 'proper' research, because you will find none if this is 'personal theory'. All i've done is verify through my own modelling what experts have known for years, and this video is supporting evidence.
It's like a school playground in here, with a few bullies running around hating and downrating everyone with a different point of view.
MoronAntidote 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Nope, i'm a 41 year old Electronics Engineer working in the field of industrial Lasers.
None of this is my own theory, since it is based on proven physics and math.
All i did was verify the official line.
Since you haven't offered a single credible argument i'll assume you don't have any.
Might i suggest an education?
MoronAntidote 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AlexJonezChannel
Go back to school and ask a teacher about what i've said.
Then come back and apologise for your ignorance :)
MoronAntidote 1 year ago
@MoronAntidote
I apologize for my ignorance!
kissmytwinkys 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@AlexJonezChannel
Newton's and Kepler's Laws are not my theories. When someone knows how to apply such laws, and you don't, you just get to sit in the corner with a big fucking hat on that reads "IDIOT".
Enjoy flipping your burgers kid, i've got cool stuff to design :P
MoronAntidote 1 year ago
MoronAntidote Holy blue fuck! Are you STILL crying!?? You are the most pathetic web stalker on YT! You have some serious issues. Every one of your comments have been laughed out of existence here because people can't stand your condescending, know-it-all BULLSHIT.. in yet you keep sneaking back here every other week just praying that some one, anyone will believe your shit. When you finally finish high school, come back here then; hopefully by that point you will stop whining like a little bitch
AlexJonezChannel 1 year ago 20
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@AlexJonezChannel
Holy blue fuck! Are you STILL crying? You are the most pathetic web stalker on YT! You have some serious issues. Every one of your comments have been laughed out of existence here because people can't stand your ignorant, know-nothing BULLSHIT, and yet you keep sneaking back here every other week just praying that someone, anyone will believe your shit. When you finally finish playschool, come back here then. Hopefully by that point you won't be such a cunt.
MoronAntidote 1 year ago
@MoronAntidote: I think you need help as well. You are extremely obsessive & you simply can't except that people here disagree with you & your very immature arrogance.
You're so obtuse that you can't comprehend why everyone is "thumbing down" your insulting comments. Your opinion is no better than anyone else but some how you fancy your OPINION to be the only possible right one, which is beyond arrogant, it's shameful.
Obsessed people like you wind up hurting others, that's the scary thing.
kneverr 1 year ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
@kneverr
1) I completely accept that people disagree with me. I can't accept that people disagree without valid argument.
2) Ignorant uneducated people don't like being schooled. Thumbing down comments has no effect on the validity of a post, but it reveals a desire to censor information which threatens their self-constructed versions of reality. That's an own-goal.
3) Some of you need to be hurt, because yo