CBS - Rare footage of north side of WTC7 on fire

[Jakguide]

The mass murderers are still alive among us.

[DiggityMcD]

Oy Vey the military our dumb slave animals are vaking up!

[DiggityMcD]

Lots of trolls. The noble lie paradigm is crumbling with the same acceleration as this building.

Sucks to lose your unworthy and corrupt power right?

[DiggityMcD]

A few small fires make all the core columns and supporting structures collapse at the exact same time, resulting in a collapse entirely consistent with elegant, costly and skillful placement and detonation of precisely placed explosives.

So why are there controlled demolition teams?

[krypternova]

Something that's a couple thousand tonnes is bound to implode. No force would be string enough to tip it over

[eDemocracyUK]

her name was "Edna Cintron"

[RobertMOdell]

@Joe2PointOh The country is now unmanageable. It is a mathematical certainty that the US will face financial collapse within the next 10 years or sooner. Frankly, I could care less anymore if the government triples its spending, or completely halts ALL of it - because it no longer matters.

[heathey2]

No government is entirely honest but you can bet for sure that no government on this planet would ever partake in something like 9/11. You can stick all your conspiracy theories where the sun doesn't shine. You crazy nut 9/11 truthers are a very small minority. People with any sense and a good sense of reality know that the 9/11 attack was carried out by terrorists. Those who disagree are just trying to divide people and cause panic. We must stay together against these crazy truthers.

[MrOceanPenguin]

@heathey2 Why do the conspiracy theorists get all the attention? Why do they need to undergo character assassination? Who cares if they have a cynical (perhaps flawed) view of the Government?

What matters is that there's enough evidence for reasonable suspicion of what took place on that day. The official investigations lack answers for the discoveries of thermite found in the WTC rubble.

[RobertMOdell]

@heathey2 Truthers are not saying that "the government" did it. They are saying there are domestic terrorists in our country operating covertly within the government.

[Westwoooooooood]

@RobertMOdell

Which, of course, is less ridiculous.

[RobertMOdell]

@Westwoooooooood Well, I would rather they stop their spending, but that's only because I lived frugally all my life and tried my hardest to save for my future. Little did I know my own government would eventually defraud me, then rob me of my life savings.

[ratm3413]

1:17 "in a ball of fire and explosion" Dan Rather

[JenniferFreethinker]

Definitely a controlled demolition job.

[soulinite]

This is the south side of WTC7

watch?v=Afb7eUHr64U

[RobertMOdell]

Those fires on the east side of WTC7 are very suspicious. It is the south-facing side of the building that would be hit by debris. Also, the steel beams that fall on the cars on the east side of the building... why are they burning? Does steel burn?

[Tzimnewman3]

@RobertMOdell "the cars on the east side of the building... why are they burning? Does steel burn?"

Thermite would melt steel and produce temperatures well over 4000 F. Thermite continues to burn underwater also.

[RobertMOdell]

@Tzimnewman3 After looking at footage for several years now, it is quite obviouis the south side of WTC7 was badly damaged. It's not the collapse itself that bothers me, its the molten material discovered following the collapse of all the buildings. It's the footage of Tower2 spewing molten material prior to collapse that bothers me.

[MrRiceowlex]

@RobertMOdell An overload of nano thermite in WTC buildings 1, 2 and 7. Nano thermite is a high tech military grade incendiary / explosive. If you noticed in the path of the fallout or the cascading pyroclastic flow of dust and debris from the demolition of the WTC towers cars and trucks were literally nearly dissolved, rusted..Nano thermite is VERY CORROSIVE..See ae911truth(dot)org Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth..1,200 engineers and scientists who have proven demolition of the WTC

[RobertMOdell]

@MrRiceowlex Of course, 9-11 is now no longer to be considered the worst event that has happened to America in the past 10 years.  The heist of the entire GDP of the nation ranks up there even higher in my book.

[GatremagWenYm]

@MrRiceowlex Actually if there was thermite in the towers, it would have detonated on the planes impact, causing the tower to fall IMMEDIATELY, which we both know it didn't.

[usd25674]

Yep those two stories on fire, real danger in bringing that building down any instant now. No wait, notice the floor below, already has burned out. hmmm how can this be. What could explain the sudden coming down of the building.

Oh look at the cars below, almost melting, yea that building is going to fall go ahead and pull it.

[SonsOfAzazel]

@MrBlink909 "there has never been a reported building collapse due to a fire"

You're insane. And apparently unable to even use Google, so you rely on silly shit you read on loony websites like PrisonPlanet.

I found almost a dozen bldgs that collapsed from fire in just a few minutes.  And NONE of them had been slammed into by a jetliner at top speed, either.

Or hit by falling, burning debris from other collapsing bldgs.

[DSCW33]

silverman is sooo greedy, he had wtc7 blown up on 911, so he could get the insurance. if he had waited till it could be cleared noone would have died in wtc7.

[pigeonshouse]

@DSCW33 Er as far as I'm aware, there were no casualties of WTC7 collapsing except the building itself. The 'pull it' statement refers to Silverstein agreeing with the fire dept that efforts in trying to save the building should not continue after what had happened in the surrounding buildings.

[DSCW33]

@pigeonshouse yes because are unaware and you think you know everything.

try "barry jennings" and then you can apologize to me . think before you speak son.

[pigeonshouse]

@DSCW33

He died a few years after the event. I've seen Loose Change 1, 2, 33 1/3 (The Final Insult to our intelligence) and IV and remember they made up some BS about hiring a private investigator who didn't want to handle the case because well let's face it he's not a coroner.

[DSCW33]

@pigeonshouse type in barry jennings and watch it

[pigeonshouse]

@DSCW33 I have already referred to him & the apparent cover-up.

The most likely event in this case is that the private investigator found out who was hiring him & didn't want his career ruined by the Loose change moronicumentary & decided not to pursue it any further, it's not clear whether he signed any contract with them but in any case if he returned his fee in full then that should compensate them.

Anyway - still not a direct casualty of Building 7 as it was vacant when it fell.

[DSCW33]

@pigeonshouse so you know more than the people that are giving eyewitness testimony?

you have done more research than the architects, physicists, pilots that say 911 is a hoax? you are more credible?

are you completely deluded?

[pigeonshouse]

@DSCW33 I'm sorry. Your argument was in Kansas - but you appear to have made a U turn and ended up in Florida via Hawaii.

I wish twoofers would stick to one point. The only reason those documentaries work so well on average intelligence people is that they don't dwell on any one subject for more than 10 minutes or so & try to connect the dots via some shaded pencilled in line that they erase later when it's disproved.

I can't claim to have all the info, but I doubt you can either.

[DSCW33]

@pigeonshouse i know what the experts say. what the professionals say.

but johnny jack off online knows more somehow. give it up dude you are kidding yourself.

[pigeonshouse]

@DSCW33

Did you not read my last sentence? "I can't claim to have all the info, but I doubt you can either."

All your info comes from a series of documentaries and a group of loose conglomerates of so-called professional 'truth' groups that can't even reach a consensus within their own communities about what they believe.

The 'experts' have largely been discredited by their peers. (Although I suppose that's some kind of conspiracy in itself if you wear tinfoil hats) & are NOT in a majority.

[DSCW33]

@pigeonshouse did you go to college?

[pigeonshouse]

@DSCW33 I'm not sure how that is relevant, but yes.

For the record, University teaching usually tells you to make deductions for yourself. Not to rely on other peoples research otherwise there'd be no need for academia - resulting in a meritocracy and that's sure something most of us would want to avoid.

However that doesn't negate a large group of people reaching a consensus. If something is disproved then it should remain disproved unless extremely compelling evidence points the other way.

[pigeonshouse]

*Waits for someone to look up the words 'meritocracy' and 'academia'* in google and come back to me*

[DSCW33]

@pigeonshouse its relevant because the same people educated you. i think.

professors, engineers, pilots, military people, lawyers, architects,

all over the world, say 911 is a hoax. But somehow, you know something they don t.

what is causing you to say all these people are wrong?

[MrBlink909]

The WorldTradeCenter was the FIRST steel building to EVER collapse over a "fire" so is it just a coincidence that all THREE collapsed on the same fucking day?

I DONT THINK SO. 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!

[nadoeloiskat]

@MrBlink909 it has never happened before in a history known to man that some volcano eruption in iceland cover all the europe with ash cloud till the moscow and forces all the planes staying down losing billions of euros. so it was the same secret zionist organization which pulled these buildings down right?

[MrBlink909]

@nadoeloiskat , wow your a fucking moron...comparing a volcano to a collapsed building..uh huh.

[nadoeloiskat]

@MrBlink909 i'm not comparing volcano to a building. i'm trying to show the level of delusional lunatism inside your head.

[MrBlink909]

@nadoeloiskat , and im telling you there has never been a reported building collapse due to a fire....why the fuck are you talking about a volcano you dumb piece of wanna be smart shit

[nadoeloiskat]

@MrBlink909 relax emoboy. theres no need to get your feelings hurt. just put your folio hat on your head and see the truth.

[MrKoenig1985]

0:45

Wow, what a inferno...

[jfragghianti]

I still don't get it. How did this building come down? All I see are fires in the building.

[th3w4tchm3n]

Google image: "tarot tower card"

almost like Isaiah 30:25 came true... even the predicition of supposed "global warming"

[MFG576798]

This Video is proof that 70 precent of people on YouTube are Stupid. WTC7 was not imploded dammit!

[djassimilator]

I wonder how they started and who was on that floor where the fires started.

c i aida or why are the floors that are burning all the way across unifom if you like on just a couple of floors. lines of squibs maybe wasn't plane debris.

[broguy]

This video was obviously before the North Tower collapsed (the tower closest to buidling 7). The skywalk connecting Tower 7 with the WTC comlex is still suspended above the street. That skywalk came down with the collapse of the North Tower. Its been seen in other video

If the building was already in damaged with a massive fire. There is no question that a second blast from the North Tower collapse would have caused enough fire and damage to bring down builiding 7 hours of later.

Lets drop it.

[AllahConsciousness]

Lesson leanred for WTC 7 engineers: Don't place important support columns at the edges of your building where exterior damage can threaten the entire fucking building!!! Instead, simply place them in the FUCKING CENTER!!!!! And make sure that if one support column goes out, OTHER support columns can hold the building up. Take note you retarded engineers, take note.....

[kingre7]

You apparently have no clue about building engineering or building for that matter.

[AllahConsciousness]

Care to explain what I'm not understanding? Building 7 did have a main support column taken out at the SW corner; this is the reason it collapsed. Do you disagree?

[kingre7]

yes, the main support column was not taken out. If you knew anything about building construction, it would take A LOT of force to take one one main support column and also there is a reason there are many support columns in a tower. If one does fail, IT DOES NOT MAKE THE ENTIRE FUCKING BUILDING COLLAPSE. also look up engineer's 'factor of 10'. you're a moron. stop talking about things you don't know anything about.

[AllahConsciousness]

You are wrong my friend. All it takes to collapse a skyscraper is a single column destroyed and some office fires spread throughout the building in key rooms. The hot jet fuel fires from the offices melted the steel in the core of the building, causing a total collapse. Didn't you know that buildings always fall symmetrically in their own footprint whenever there are bad fires in them? Building 7 came down at freefall speed from natural causes and shitty steel made by retards.

[kingre7]

yea, you know all. you fucking moron. it takes controlled demo to make a tower collapse on itself OR THE FUCKING BUILDING WILL TOPPLE DO TO THE SMALL RATIO OF BASE TO HEIGHT. Look up the "floor plan of WTC 7". See all those little rectangles? THOSE ARE THE SUPPORT COLUMNS. YOU TAKE ONE OUT AND YOU KNOW WHAT - THE BUILDING IS STILL GOING TO STAND. THERE'S NOT JUST ONE MAIN SUPPORT COLUMN IN CONSTRUCTION YOU DUMBASS. OBVIOUSLY YOU HAVE NO FUCKING CLUE WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT SO SHUT THE FUCK UP.

[kingre7]

didn't you know. there has NEVER been a case where a fire lead to a building collapsing onto itself? the reason why the world is the way it is today - drum roll...... PEOPLE LIKE YOU ARE COMPLETE RETARDS.

[AllahConsciousness]

LoL! Couldn't you tell that I was trying to pull a leg on someone with those comments? Of course building 7 was CDed. And yes, people do actually believe that an office fire can melt steel support columns and that idiot info-babes on CNN care about the truth.

[MFG576798]

Fire melts Steel Dammit! Steel Collapses when support is gone Dammit! Buildings are built with Steel DAMMIT!

[ArcanineKing]

oh okay.

guess we should use fire to bring down buildings like WTC7 and save a bunch of million dollars from the development of demolitions?

Right. Melting point of steel is 2750F. Hydrocarbon fires aren't even 700F. That's not even enough to melt heavy steel and concrete. Learn2Science and chemistry. Fallen after 5 hours when the Windsor burned for over 24 hours and several floors collapsed.

Go read a science book about chemistry.

[Miko5000]

@ArcanineKing - "Melting point of steel is 2750F"

Yeah, but it didn't have to melt, just weaken. At what temps does it weaken?

"Learn2Science and chemistry."

I bet you aren't a scientist or a chemist. You definitely aren't a writer.

"Fallen after 5 hours when the Windsor burned for over 24 hours"

So what?

"Go read a science book about chemistry. "

Go grow a brain and stop believing everything you see in conspiracy videos.

[ArcanineKing]

Oh gee, wait a second. How HOT would it have to be to weaken steel? All that fuel burned up in 5 minutes or so, so all that hot temperature wasn't HOT at all, otherwise, plane engines would melt at such temperature, and most engines are built with titanium, aluminum and light steel alloys, that shit will MELT at the temperatures of uncontrolled jet fuel burn, which is about 600F in open air. As far as I am concerned, WTC was vented.

Read about jet fuel burn and then come back, genius.

[Miko5000]

"All that fuel burned up in 5 minutes or so"

Leaving a raging inferno that people jumped to their deaths to avoid.

"Read about jet fuel burn and then come back, genius."

The makers of the jet fuel, experts on building fires, and the wtc designers all disagree with you. Why were the outer columns sagging before collapse? Because of the explosives that hadn't gone off yet.

[Miko5000]

"plane engines would melt at such temperature"

The engines shot through the building and were found. One landed on Murray St. What's your point?

"How HOT would it have to be to weaken steel?"

That hot, obviously. Did you see the pictures of the beams sagging before collapse? How do you think that happened?

[ArcanineKing]

and also, so what?

So what is, that the WTC7 fell due to fire, as according to NIST reports. Which apparently, weakened reinforced steel and concrete enough to make a 47 story tall building to symmetrically collapse with all support columns and core columns giving way.

I may not be a chemist, but I am a student of architecture. And I know this shit doesn't add up.

When you study architecture and structural engineering, let me know.

[Miko5000]

"When you study architecture and structural engineering, let me know."

Send a mass email to your college professors telling them your theory and ask them what they think. Let me know how that works out.

"building to symmetrically collapse"

Wasn't symmetrical, though it looked like that from the outside. First one side went, then the penthouse, then the shell.

[ArcanineKing]

And also, you said fire melts steel, not weaken. So now you just trying to run from that mistake.

Seriously, get more educated before initiating into a moronic argument.

[Miko5000]

When did I say that? I said fire weakens steel. Of course, a hot enough fire melts steel, like in a foundry, but the steel didn't melt.  It weakened, twisted, and gave way.

[Guerillaradio13]

dammit calm down dammit?

[Georgebushpimps]

which other buildings did that? burned in a few key rooms and collapsed into their own footprint? surely if a building on fire always collapses in that manner it has happened many times before. so tell us which ones and when and why?please

[AllahConsciousness]

I hear what you are saying bro, obviously a few contained fires couldn't have brought down that building, however, the mysterious and elusive hole 10 stories up the building that encompassed one of it's corners, supposedly took it down. Damn terrorist hole!

[Georgebushpimps]

lol terrorist holes

[AllahConsciousness]

Saying that 9/11 was a total inside job is going a little too far without sufficient evidence in my opinion, but certainly there is no doubt that various intelligence agencies, namely CIA and Mossad, could pick a few militant idiots out of Arabdom and use a few traitor Muslim operatives to convince them to commit such a dastardly crime. Inside jobs aren't needed where there are willing foreign stooges to carry out your will.

[AllahConsciousness]

Note how a terrorist attack on U.S. soil hasn't occured since 9/11, because even the most moronic of the Arab militants now understand Zion's game plan, to provoke violence as an excuse to expand imperial operations in the persian gulf and Afghanistan via the United States.

[AllahConsciousness]

Didn't you know that people are too stupid and incompitent to commit a crime and blame it on others without muckracking CNN info babes exposing them.

[kingre7]

YOU ARE A FUCKING MORON. SHUT THE FUCK UP - YOU"RE ARGUING WITH AN ENGINEER. YOU HAVE NO FUCKING CLUE WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT. jet fuel burning temp is HALF of steel's melting point. AND WANT TO KNOW SOMETHING ELSE: TO KEEP THE JET FUEL AT THE BURNING TEMP YOU NEED TO KEEP FEEDING THE FIRE JET FUEL or the temp falls drastically down. GOD. THE FUCKING WORLD IS FULL OF GOD DAMN MORONS. SHUT THE FUCK UP. IT TAKES MORE THAN ONE MAIN SUPPORT COLUMN TO TAKE DOWN ANY FUCKING BUILDING YOU TOOL.

[icarlybigfan95]

0:49

[NanoLopez2]

Those lower floors shouldn't be burning either.

[ladollyvita]

Anyone notice something very strange?? Why are all the fires and broken windows on the North side of Building 7 when in fact the North side is facing away from the Towers?? That makes it impossible for the WTC 7 fires and broken windows to be caused by falling debris from the Twin Towers!

[marek0086]

they demolished WTC7 because thats where all the paper work was for the planning of 9/11.

I remember hearing there was a CIA head quarters in that building.

Satanist scumbags!.

[lizardfirefighter110]

ladollyvita, I would like to add. Has anyone wondered why the fires in building 7 are on different floors and different ends of the building? Keep in mind that fires are at the other end of the building away from the area of falling debris. No fire en-between? How does fire pop up by itself at the other end of the building? Building 7 was 355 feet from the nearest tower. How could steel components jump this gap and still start a fire on the other end of building 7, from the point of impact

[JCeiver612]

ya i never actually thought about that. But it is true, some fires were on opposite sides of the building than the impact.

[Banez1991]

From what iv seen in news reports the building was on fire for about 5 hours ... :S

[zeno808]

@ladollyvita

Yeah I've never seen a fire spread from where it started./sarc

[MyLittleBomb]

@zeno808 Yeah fire makes steel skyscrapers fall. /sarcasmoff.

[ScouseTapas]

@ladollyvita There is a video of the southside on 7.Try searching for it,and you wil l see exactly why 7 collapsed.

[Ahlywog]

@ScouseTapas Except the debris damage (according to NIST) was not the cause of the collapse.

[Kalphiter45]

@ladollyvita Are you kidding me?

Can you not see the huge plumes of black smoke on the north side?

[Dahhkness]

@Kalphiter45 Of course he doesn't see it. It doesn't jibe with his little Truther delusions, so it either didn't happen, or is fake. You can prove anything with the Anti-Scientific-Method!

[marvelfannumber1]

@ladollyvita

Omg a 2nd grader can tell you that fires spread yet you dont know that. T_T

[mrgameshow01]

@ladollyvita What the hell? It spread for 5 hours and 8 minutes! My name is ladollyvita, i do know what happened on 9/11, but i'm not smarter than an ADULT!

[endimion17]

@ladollyvita No, that means the fire spread from the south side through the building. Fires migrate, you know? They're not static phenomena.

The damage on the north side was nothing compared to the horrific state of the south facade. It was in a mess.

Firefighters abandoned it because they concluded that it was going down, after hearing it creak few hours before, and seeing a 3-storey bulge in one corner.

It was ABANDONED because of the fear of collapse. Are you capable of understanding that?

[Clarrisani]

@ladollyvita "Why are all the fires and broken windows on the North side of Building 7 "

Because the fires spread through the building and the heat broke the windows. That is how fire works, after all. -_-

[Typhoon07]

0:49

Almost looks like the broken windows are letters spelling something out.

[tube2a]

Funny how the fires and the only rows of broken windows are on the floors with all the records regarding ENRON and many other investigations.. word.

[R0mp3l]

hmm so it was arranged (the attack) ... you in america have fema camps... most germans are sleeping yet so we don't need those

[RoelofKenth]

Your all Germans.. just like the Dutch, Deens, English.

Fuck those free somthing. They want some new world order.

[RoelofKenth]

Just bomb Brussel. And a little of our The Hague.

[Typhoon07]

At 0:54 it looks like the windows are broken into letters.

[Twinhit]

What I don't get is what happened to the sprinkler systems?

IF the heroes of the fire dept who approve fire safety measures, gave these buildings a pass, then I would think they would be held liable for negligence. But then, they are "heroes" and government employees and thus government.

It's the stupid things that bother me.

[ChristopherMarlowe]

How many times have you heard that WTC7 was "scooped out" on one side by the collapse of the other buildings. But I didn't see any scoop missing. Official Story is complete BS.

[felicity5150]

to the idiot moneyt, CDI who get paid billions by the govt would keep their mouth shut. You have to be one butt stupid piece of shit to even remotely believe that an office fire on a few floors (many burned out as you can see) would cause a 47 story skyscraper to fall straight down at free fall speed. I mean real real stupid beyond any human comprehension.

[trewqwert]

Wow - broken windows and fire. No wonder it collapsed uniformly at nearly free fall speed.

[BOBSTAHL]

wtc 7 fire was set, as wtc 1& 2 was burning and coming down all communications was monitored from wtc 7, building was destroyed after objective was complete. i hear as many as 8vehicles were seen being excorted

AWAY FROM wtc 7 area 1 hr before it collapsed.

[Skeptic121]

The mystery of WTC7 is not the collapse but the manner of the collapse: straight down, intact, and at free fall acceleration for 2.3 seconds (NIST)

Free fall for 2.3 seconds means almost 26 meters of vertical support structure was removed suddenly. Not weakened by fire, not bent, not just damaged, but GONE.

NIST now admits free fall for 2.3 seconds after initially denying it. Free fall for 2.3 seconds is consistent with a controlled demolition but maybe there is another explanation. Anyone?

[mistaspot1]

What is the argument for how this building even caught on fire to begin with? Why would falling *debris* cause this fire to happen?

I don't buy it.

[CPLnavy23]

idk how falling debris could catch a building on fire, but its there for you. Fucking bombs did that, my ass. The proof is in the video. You conspiracy theorists would have a better chance of persuading me that aliens had to do with 9/11.

[jfragghianti]

What an inferno. These fires at wtc7 were SURELY the cause of the collapse of this building. Wait a minute, I am a smart guy, I almost forgot. THAT EXPLANATION IS TOTAL BULLSHIT.

[Untergrundseele]

This is just the archive burning. I bet on this!

Notice that here are only the windows burst because of the fire. But if the damage really came from the towers, there would be more damage on this side. At least more than some broken windows from the fire...

Compare it to the Oklahoma Bombing. That building really had to suffer, but still stood!

[annie46664]

As for 9/11, nobody has said it better than David Icke, when he once said something like: 'Even questioning who was actually responsible & why they performed such a heinous act, is an insult to the intelligence of your average 10yr old!' I wish that Americans would stop taking 9/11 PERSONALLY. The acts of ANY leaders of ANY country, don't reflect nor represent the beliefs, hearts nor minds of the majority of the people of the nations they're supposed to act on behalf of RESPONSIBLY & HONESTLY!

[wheelst]

David Icke? the guy who believes the leaders of the world are actualy lizards? Ok then.

[annie46664]

I know this will sound harsh & automatically offend many, despite NO INTENTION of such whatsoever, but it's time to 'get over' the shock, disbelief & horror of the realization of an INSIDE JOB here, & refrain from going into denial, but instead, to help ensure that the perpetrators are brought to book & made to pay for their crimes. That's the only way that 9/11 can be put to any good use, because then, others with similar evil intent, will be too afraid to carry out their devious 'plans'.

[1hero93]

why cant you all just get along or rather shut the fuck up who gives a shit how the buildings fell

[wakenjake420]

so it should have fallen to the south,,its weakest side,,the path of least resistance,,,but nnnnooooooooooo,,,it crimps in the middle and drps straifgt down,,I don't care if your uncle wipes his ass with diplomas,,that building was demolisionized,,,yeah,,,thats right,,,demolisionized

[Claytrainor]

dude, im with ya... but the word is demolished :-)

[monyetStephan]

ok sure.. now tell me which demolition company would do the job and keeping their mouth shut.

How come there were fires inside the building then? Isn't that a dangerous combination of explosives and fire for the demolition proces?

[jizzmonger]

That fire is pretty intense. It's surprising that it fell down if you don't know all the facts.

[kalvinphil]

Wow...... I can feel the heat now from that raging trashcan fire...lol. Im suprised the building didnt just melt from heat...lol

[godzilla1234567890]

fuck you asshole steel dont have to melt for a building to fail all it takes is alot of damage which the southern side of wtc 7 had alot of and fire and thats enough to bring it down my uncle isan engineer and discloses all these bullshit theories

[kalvinphil]

ok...buddy. whatever you say. Since that was the first time any building had ever fallen from fire.

[godzilla1234567890]

it doesn't have to melt buddy you know how much a building that size would weigh. 7 wtc had a similar floor design as the trade towers the building just buckled

[kalvinphil]

but the plane hit the very top of the building in one case.

[monyetStephan]

Yea i wonder how many buildings got help from something called the fire department this was left burning for 8 hours.

[kalvinphil]

I meant to say STEEL building.  I tried it....I tried to melt some steel in my back yard with a match....and I couldnt get it to melt...lol. You try.

[TV341]

a raging inferno HA HA what a joke