So much for the open borders We are all happy Natives that got along peacefully.People are people and this vid proves that the whole Mexica-Azlatan myth is full of b.s.
To learn your old heritage of modern day hispanic/ latino, We are Nikan Tlaka.."meaning we the people here" NATIVES dark skin, light skin, All we know is white history, Its good 2 know ours too no matter what they say, It will make great in change your life and make u proud visit these sites that speak for all central, south, americans with Indigenous roots MEXICAUPRISING. NET MEXICA-MOVEMENT. ORG theres many sites this MEXIKA aka aztec today was our last great empire..learn the truth. stay up
Demons EXIST! That is the least Proof which can show us that all these Religions and holy books are TRUE!. We have SEEN THINGS! We have DONE! In MODERN TIME! I have visited many people who ARE ALIVE and NOT old neither Religios who have witnesed many things, HUGE things that maybe u laugh about! But they are TRUE. We humans NEVER believe until the thing happens us! Why? It is better to analyse and believe because Hundreds of Thousends of people DON'T LIE.
@xOxKurdParstxOx As I just said. There are supernatural things, but not flying attention whore's on clouds. We don't know what they are, but they definately aren't something someone made up. The human was never meant to know much or travel far. We live on an island of ignorance, surrounded by the black seas of infinity, and the mists of time.
@Horrorlord1 This COMMENT Was NICE! "The Island of Ignorance surrounded by Black seas" YEAH 100% Right! For the first time, I love my enemies comment.
Ironically, the word Demon came from the greeks. A demon was never a bad spirit. But a low spirit. Much like us humans, thus, are we the demons the Gods fear?
only Demons desire and love human secrefices! Still in large parts of the world (Middle East,India,Asia...) the wizards call on great Demons to perform big tasks for them! They secrefice meat and such things! but the wizards say: The Noble-King demons need Human-secrefise who wre too powerful, therefore we can not call on them to come and use them for private tasks! Aztect Ideas=From Demons.
@xOxKurdParstxOx Christians used to sacrifice, kill people thinking otherwise by throwing rocks, hanging, and interrogating people if they knew any atheist or a "heretic" they could kill. There are no demons you brainwashed punk! Everyone is using you... The government, the church. Religion is used to control the masses, and slow humanity and advance down....
@Horrorlord1 There are No Demons? YOU IDIOT, That is the BIGGEST Bullshit of the time! I know many FUCK Atheist people or "Modern People" saying so! Just to show themselves. We all KNOW that they exist, I wish they hadn't but they do! I can GIVE YOU REAL TRUE events which have happened my relatives.... in Hunted houses... my aunts and uncles! and THEY ALL Are ALIVE and ALL NOT Religios!!!. One lies, 2 Lie, 100 lie...visit the Village near Dubai whose people has LEFT it because of Demons.
@Horrorlord1 Christians NEVER USED TO Sacrifice ANYONE! They used to EXECUTE people YES! Sacrifice and Execution are TWO Different things. So you say religions are LIE? which means MOSSES and his life story never TOOK place? Jeasus the same... so on?? YOU are lying to who? To yourself. ALL Peoples in ENTIRE world believed in spirits and such things! From continent to continent! They all had found such things! You say all of them were liars? and a scumbag like you is right?.
@xOxKurdParstxOx You see. You have NOTHING to back those things up. But you still blindlessly protect them because of your flying attention whore. That is why you will never be able to accept the truth...
@Horrorlord1 You are WHORE bitch, how dare u! The real whores LIE in West! Go check out ur women, all 55 years old who have changed 100000 men! 2 daughters with 2 different men and a new boyfriend at home! BITCH, Corrupt shit. Go learn life! What life is, since ur entire life is built on Prostitution. There is NO TRUTH that what I wrote! DEMONS EXIST (in every point of view)+Aztects were DEMONS themselves or supported by them!
@xOxKurdParstxOx Just check this video: Imagine if all atheists left america.
And stop being insultive to aztecs. Everything you don't believe "came from demons". How pathetic... They just loved their gods more than you seem to love yours...
And observing your bad writing, you are most seemingly a little kid who shouldn't use his parent's computer. Your parents have brainwashed you. WAKE UP!
@AztecWolfx human sacrifices are not barbarian act?ofc its not barbarian act cause its act of a savages btw barbarian in translation means people who dont speak the same language as i do(ancient rome)
If you like watching documentaries on youtube, visit my website which you can find on my youtube channel!
I have created a collection of links to interesting documentaries on subjects like the history and culture of nations, world war II, science and conspiracy theories!
Or simply select and copy the following lines into your browser's address bar:
The Aztec Empire was one of the greatest is mesoamerica; along with the Mayans and Incas. It is truely sad that they are all gone. But the practice of subjecting conquered indian nations to brutal tribute in good and more importantly tribe members for sacrafice to the Aztec gods did much to undermine that greatness. Cortez? A gold hungry religious zealot who destroyed the Empire in the name of profit, religion, and king. I suppose to the Spanish, he was a hero, but certainly not the natives.
@shantonu9 and @cuzcatlan36 . Both of you, you're being ridiculous. God, no matter from what religion you come from, would want you to be debating over such a silly topic :)
why is it that cortez is rememberd as a hero or killing an entire city and way of life but the US is so evil for getting the natives onto reservasions?
Did the individual in the documentary say the Aztecs transformed themselves into rulers of the most powerful empire "Central America" had ever known...."THAT IS A GEOGRAPHICAL MISTAKE", that is DISRESPECTFUL.....
Our society is full of the followers of kana dajjal or andhak asur or antichrist. Qualities of kana dajjal (antichrist): Lies, betray and usury. Kaaf for kizb (lies), Faa for fareb (betray) and Raa for ribaa (usury or interest).
@AztecWolfx yeah funny, they were far more brutal then whites, in fact cortes when conquered the capital, ask to stop, but his native allies make a massacre. still cry?
(Error 1:19) Aztecs did not begin in Central American, they expanded to central America (Guatemala) but they are not from Central America. This is a research error. The Aztecs are of Mayan Descent. The Mayans were the ones that expanded successfully all the way down central America.
@anthonyontherocks Totally wrong about the Aztecs being of Mayan descent. Where do you get your facts? The Aztecs and the Maya are completely distinct groups. They have about as much in common as Chinese and Russians. There languages and culture are totally different. Have you ever been to a Maya or an Aztec site yourself?
Get your facts straight before you post nonsense. Read a book for fuck's sake.
No sir you are wrong. Think about it, your saying Aztecs flourished out of nowhere as a big tribe. Not only did they live VERY close to the Mayan civilization, who worshipped the same Gods, spoke similar languages, and resembled each other. The Aztecs left the Mayan world due to the politics of the time (land, food, water etc.) There are countless records that indicate their blood lines. Please do your research before you challange others. And by the way, russians are asians too.(Jail education)
@anthonyontherocks I don't even remember what I said. I'm not sure what you're talking about. That isn't your fault. It's just that I forgot what I said. What was it?
Anyway, I don't think I ever said that Aztecs were totally unrelated to the Maya. But the Maya were a distinct people. And the languages are not similar at all. That's for sure: Maya and Nahuatl are completely different. They aren't even in the same language family, the way that French and Romaninan or Yucatec and Kiche are.
@supralex1 how dare u disrespect my culture if you think my ancestors were barbaric look at yours people die everyday from murder for no reason my people did it for the sun god so you can rot in the underworld were u belong
@supralex1 I beg to differ there, my friend. True, the whole human sacrifice thing was pretty brutal and barbaric. But they did what they did because of their beliefs. I don't don't think they did it simply for the sake of murdering someone....as weird as that sounds lol. However, they built a city the likes of which had NEVER been seen by anyone in Europe. The Spanish killed them mercilessly, as well as with disease. In reality, were they any better?
filthy barbarians, anyone who kills to stone, wooden idols or whatever is going straight to hell, and we have to thank the spaniards for sending a lot of those bastards on an early trip to it!!!
@AztecPrideX The Spaniards killed for a lot of reasons, non of which, had to do with God or His word in the Bible. They were catholics, therefore, non-christians, for catholics worship idols made of wood and stone( just like the aztecs) with the only difference that their idols were meant to be biblical people such as mary, the apostles and others. Even if you were to insist on calling them "christian" their practice, and dogma contradicted everything that Jesus taught!!
@cuzcatlan36 Are you stupid? Why would you say that Catholics are non-Christians? It's the oldest Christian sect? Look it up in any encyclopedia. Were you born stupid or did your mother drop you as a baby?
@shantonu9 Funny you use the word stupid, because you are about to be proven to be the stupid one. Jesus' disciples were the first Christians. Catholics were born in the year 150. This is 121 years after the death of Jesus. The catholic religion became what it is around the year 600. What distinguishes catholicism from real Christianity is huge. Catholicism is a blend of pagan and Biblical themes. First off, the forgiveness of sins in catholicism is attributed to priests, when in the Bible it..
belongs to God himself. Jesus becomes a "second" or "minor" god in catholicism, when in the Bible HE is God himself. Catholicism worships mary, the apostles and others, in the Bible only God merits worship. Baptism in the Bible is a symbol of salvation, in catholicism it literally "saves" plus what they practice is not actually baptism but rantism(sprinkling) which is of pagan origin. the last supper in catholicism is the literal body and blood of Jesus they eat, in the Bible is just a symbol..
Their insistance on salibacy for priests is non biblical, for God instituted marriage and God said that it is not good for men to be alone. Catholics hold the pope to be God's vicar(representative) on earth, the Bible says only Jesus is. Catholics believe they can be forgiven after death, the Bible says we only get one chance as long as we are alive. Catholics believe in salvation by good deeds, God says it is by grace and only through Jesus. That's why Catholics are not Christians.
@cuzcatlan36 I'm not going to get into a petty quarrel with you about who is and who is not a Christian. The point is that you don't get to decide who is and who isn't. The community at large does. And the community of scholars and experts leaves no doubt that Catholics are Christians. Whether they follow your particular (and erroneous) definition of Christianity does not matter at all. All you are doing is quoting Paul out of context. "God" says nothing of the kinds.
@shantonu9 petty is not. and you're right I don't get to decide, God does( not the community) nor scholars or "experts" for Christianity is beyond theirs or your understanding(it's a spiritual thing you don't get). Catholicism is diametrically opposed to the Bible, to God himself, and to the Christ. What do you know of context? If you had actually read the Bible you would not defend catholicism!!! there's no "particular" christianity, there's only "Jesus' Christianity"
@cuzcatlan36 Why don't we just look it up on Wikipedia? Isn't that a fair thing to do? I mean, I'm not interested in your version, you're not interested in mine. Why don't we just turn to some neutral source to find out?
I don't think that Wikipedia is the answer for everything. But in this case, isn't that a fair thing to do? We are talking about terminology here, not the specifics of your personal belief. Right? Shouldn't we therefore look at how the word "Christian" is actually used?
@shantonu9 You want to look for the word of the CREATOR of the universe in Wikipedia??? How can wikepedia possibly help you define a spiritual encounter with the ONLY savior of menkind? How can that help you realize that you are saved because of what Jesus did in the cross, and not your "good" deeds. How can wekepedia tell you that Mary was not the mother of God, for God has no mother, in fact mary was a sinner just as you and I, and that Mary does not intercede for us, ONLY JESUS???
@cuzcatlan36 Listen my dear friend, this is exactly the kind of debate I do not want to have. You have your interpretation, and I have mine. I am just saying that, as the word is commonly used, "Christian" applies to Catholics as well as Evangelicals. This is true whether or not Catholics meet your personal definition.
If we just use your personal interpretation of scripture we can't get anywhere in the discussion because not everyone shares your interpretation. Isn't that obvious?
@shantonu9 A term must have a definition. Weather history books, encyclopedias, and even fellow evangelicals accept the inclusion of catholics as christians doesn't mean that is the correct definition. Lets start with "Christian": A follower of Christ-this individual by virtue of being a follower IMMITATES his master, LIVES as his master, BELIEVES as his master. When we compare the catholic dogma to the scriptures, this simple definition of "christian" simply falls apart, rendering such belief
@cuzcatlan36 Okay, let's use your definition to see if you are a Christian. Do you imitate and live as Christ did? If so, have you given away your earthy possessions (like your computer) to live among the poor and diseased contantly trying to minister to them?
Oh you haven't. I guess you're not a Christian by your own definiton.
@shantonu9 The definition I gave earlier stands. First, Yes I do as Christ did. Secondly, giving away possesions is not what Christianity is about, for it is not about "doing" and achieving heaven through my own deeds. Jesus knew that the young man's heart was bound by earthly posessions, and not the kingdom of God. It is through the deeds of Jesus that I am saved. By grace and not deeds says Paul. His salvation is perfect, and it is final and secure because it belongs to Him, not my effort.
@cuzcatlan36 What a joke, you hyprocrite! Go back and read your own words. You are changing your *own definition* so that it suits your easy middle class lifestyle.
Keep your interpretion to yourself! I can judge you by your fruits. When you move to Bolivia to work with the poor, then I will give your interpretation some respect. But don't go around saying "this person is not a Christian because they don't believe what I believe." Fix your own house, then worry about what's wrong with others.
@shantonu9 Oh, I see, you're talking about the posessions business. That's your catholic mind talking. I stand by what I said. Your catholic upbringing tells you, you must "perform" duties to earn points in heaven. The Bible must be taken in context and as a whole!! Martirdom, doing good deeds, this and the other will not "make you" a christian. Now, faith produces "works", and a life consistent with the truth, you do "works" because you are saved, not because you can earn salvation.
@cuzcatlan36 I'm just using your *own words.* To be a Christian is to immitate Christ and to live as he did. YOU said, not me.
I guess you're not woman enough to stand by your own words, which is very sad.
I really feel sorry for you because you don't even realize what a liar and a hyprocrite you truly are. Look within yourself and compare your life of luxury to that of Christ's, and then answer (to God, not to me) whether you think you are faithfully and honestly following Christ's path.
@shantonu9 Your catholic mind does not comprehend that to "imitate Jesus and live like Him" transcends mere material possesions and instead takes us into the realm of the spiritual. What mattered most to Jesus? answer:Love. He wanted His followers to spread the gospel that He showed them, Love, Salvation, and undying commitment against sin. Did Jesus oppose financial well being? A: No. Several of His followers were wealthy. Would being poor make you a better Christian? A:NO.
@cuzcatlan36 Name one of Jesus's 12 disciples that was wealthy. When did Jesus EVER talk about financial well being? You are a liar! You said one thing and now you want to avoid the consequences of it. You know deep down that you are are a fraud. You said that you had to IMITATE Jesus, but no, not literally, because that would mean giving up your posessions, and that would be very hard wouldn't it? So you twist the meaning of your words so that they mean whatever you want them to mean. LOL!
@shantonu9 "Luke" was a physician, so he was a man of means. God gave Solomon his riches, and David, and Job, and Abraham. They were men after God's own heart and they were wealthy!! Since Jesus was and is God, was He contradicting himself when He told the rich young man to give up his wealth and follow him? NO, of course not, He was talking about PRIORITIES!!! What is first in our lives, Him or something else. He also said that we must repudiate our parents and friends in order to follow him..
@cuzcatlan36 You are a real joke and a liar and a fraud.
You said, "Jesus did not oppose financial well being" and that "several of his followers were wealthy."
So then I asked you to name one of his 12 disciples that was wealthy. And I also asked you to point to a single scripture where Jesus himself talked about wealth in a positive manner.
And guess what? Just like the exposed fraud that you are, you evaded and avoided the questions. Don't be a coward and a fraud: answer the questions!
@shantonu9 Did Jesus ever talk about obtaining finacial well being? NO, He didn't. The mayority of his followers were poor, only Luke was probably the exception. Jesus spoke about the need to share our blessings with others and the responsibilty of such blessings, an example was the parable of the talents. God(Jesus) created the world and everything in it was laid upon the feet of men. Wealth is not the problem, your heart is.
@cuzcatlan36 I hope you realize that Luke was not one of Jesus's disciples and there is no Biblical evidence that he knewJesus personally.
You define Christianity as following Jesus and you admit that he never speaks of wealth highly. Instead of following Jesus's teachings, e.g. Luke 6:24. you go ahead and acumulate wealth, in contradiction of those teachings.
Yet, while fail to be a Christian by your own definition, you boldly claim that Catholics aren't Christians. Frankly, you're a mess.
@shantonu9 Don't worry about me being a fraud or liar, worry about your own soul cause right now you are heading for hell cause you don't know Jesus and you have no salvation certainty as I do. Your catholic dogma blinds you to the truth of Jesus, and instead you worship " la virgen de guadalupe", idols made of wood, plaster or what have you, directly contradicting God himself when He said: "Thou shall have no other gods before me" your prayers are not heard cause you pray to demons.
@cuzcatlan36 Your threats of hell and damnation don't scare me. You've proven time and again that you haven't really studied the Bible very carefully. You seem to think that you have all the answers. But it should be obvious that you really don't even know how to ask the right questions.
For someone who clearly knows so little, and has such feeble command of both logic and the Biblical text, your arrogance regarding the nature of Christianity is truly astounding.
@shantonu9 Threats? How can I possibly threaten you by stating a fact. If I say a car is coming, that's no threat, it's simply stating the obvious. But if you want to speak of threats, think of "time" as a real threat. You may die tonight or 80 years from now, either way, you will face your maker, and your maker will not be "la virgen Morena" it will be God who has NO mother. The question will be: "did you accept Jesus as Savior and Lord while you were alive?" I hope your answer will not be..
@cuzcatlan36 You aren't stating facts idiot. You are stating your opinon. And I don't agree with it. I could easily say you're going to hell, and a Jew or a Muslim could easily say the same thing to both of us.
You have your interpretation of the Bible. I think it's wrong. I've used your own definition to clearly show that you aren't a Christian.
Don't you see the futility of this discussion? That is why I said we should look to a neutral source like an encyclopedia. But you don't want reason.
@shantonu9 First you debate me on what is a "christian" I tell you what a Christian is, and then you want to go outside of the word of God to find what a "christian" is in an encyclopedia? Would a muslim look for what a muslim is outside the Koran? Rediculous. You started defending Catholicism that you claim to be a "christian" religion, but you want outside definitions? What exactly do you believe? I'll tell you, you don't know what you believe! You don't believe the Bible because you...
@cuzcatlan36 Get this through your skull. You are not qualified to tell me what a Christian is or isn't. You've changed your own definition about six times in two days. Do you understand how totally stupid you are?
Christianity is more than the Bible. It is also the traditions that were passed down directly from the first Apostles, including St. Peter. Do you celebrate Christmas? When do you celebrate it? What day? Is that from the Bible? No, but it's a tradition that Christans have.
@shantonu9 Actually, I am qualified to tell YOU what a "christian" IS. why, you may wonder? Because I have been Saved by His grace, and there is only one way to be a Christian, and that is accepting the CHRIST(Savior) of God(Him in human form) "Christianity is more than the Bible" ????? Truly, satan has your heart!! You take "CHRIST" out of christian, and super impose TRADITIONS over God's own word!!! Men's traditions nontheless!!! That is WHY catholicism is NOT christianity!!!! NOT CHRISTIANI
@cuzcatlan36 Whatever. You can't keep your own definition straight in your head. First you said to be a Christian one had to "immitate" Jesus and "live" as Jesus did. Those are your own words.
Now, it's something different. Now it's "being saved" by Jesus.
You realize that you can't even maintain a consistent defintion for two consecutive days? Come on. You should admit that you too stupid to understand scripture and you need guidance. Otherwise you will continute to believe foolish lies.
@cuzcatlan36 And not only do you know nothing of Christianity, you also clearly know nothing about Judaism or Islam. Because of course Muslims look outside of the Koran (for example to the Hadith) to find out about Islam. Jews do the same with the oral tradition of the Talmud.
You just haven't studied enough to have the faintest idea of what you are talking about.
@shantonu9 your virgen de guadalupe will NOT intercede for you on judgenment day because i haven't yet come across any guadalupe on the bible. the little i know about the bible is simple: without JESUS you're gonna be toast cause i don't recall no guadalupe dying on the cross, nor God declaring "For God so Loved the world that He gave His only begotten 'daughter' "Guadalupe" so that anyone who so believeths in 'her' shall have everlasting life" If your catholic, you're gonna be in deep Trouble
@cuzcatlan36 I'm not scared at all. You see, you aren't an authority. You barely understand the Bible that you read. You fail to live up to your own defintion of Christian (at least one of the various defintions you've proposed).
Anyone can see you're an ignorant fraud who wants to believe that you can go ahead and contradict the plain language of Jesus's teachings e.g., Mat. 16:13-20 and continue to cast stones at fellow Christians for what you believe are their failings! You are a joke!
@shantonu9 Looks like you're gonna search for God in an encyclopedia, and I will continue to learn from Him in the Bible. You will worship mary and the apostles( and asorted mexican deities) and I will trust in Jesus. I certainly don't know enough to lecture you, but for you to ignore the lectures of the Bible would be truly tragic. Since you are the "christian" one, and I am not, I hope your traditions and all the combined idols you worship can do something for you in this life, cause the next
@cuzcatlan36 Listen my brother, what I am trying to say to you (a bit harshly and for that, I am sorry) is that the Bible needs to be understood in the correct light. That light is provided by 2000 years of interpretion by the Church. It is not always right, but it is a good guide and better than doing it on your own.
I want to be forceful with you because Evangelicals are also forceful and you probably have not heard someone forcefully defend the Church. May our Lord Jesus Christ be with you.
@cuzcatlan36 By the way, I think of you as a fellow beliver. I may have used harsh language, and I am sorry for that, especially if i have offended you.
I'm just trying to get you to be humble and see that there is more than one way to look at things. You've probably been taught just one thing. I was born a Catholic, then I became an Evangelical, then I returned to the Catholic Church. I do not say that the Church is without fault. But you should not be saying Catholics aren't Christians.
@shantonu9 Can a catholic become a Christian? YES, of course. How? You must reject the catholic dogma? WHY? Because Catholicism denies the supremacy of Christ! How does it do that? By twisting the truth of the nature of Jesus and His Salvation. Jesus says you are saved by faith, catholics: by good deeds. Jesus:repent while there is time(life). catholics: a priest can pray away sins when you are already dead. Jesus is vicar, not pope. no pope in Bible. Perverting the word is a sin.
@cuzcatlan36 My friend and brother. Catholics are Christians. We read the same Bible and pray to the same God as you do. We just have a different intpretation of Scripture. You haven't studied enough to understand why we intrepret it the way we do. I feel sorry for you that you are so close-minded and indoctrinated by false rumors about the Church. But all I can do is pray that God will open your eyes to the truth and wish you well. I was, after all, exactly like you.
@shantonu9 you believe in historical traditions and rituals, but you don't know God personally or His word. You want to define "christianity" as a mathematical formula. Only in the Bible can you find who and what is a "Christian". Some subjects are oppened to interpretation in the Bible, but there are universal truths that can not be altered. One of them is that ONLY JESUS(God) can save. Hell is a mathematical certainty without Him.
@cuzcatlan36 You just don't know enough to lecture me. Sorry. You clearly don't have a very good command of the Bible. You aren't able to match my understanding of Scripture. I very easily exposed the contradictions and hypocrisies inherent in your own definition and the way you lead your life. Yet, you persist with your silly threats.
Why should I believe a single word you say, or trust your bizzare interpretations, when you fail to be Christian by your own definition?
@shantonu9 "I didn't accept Jesus because Cuzcatlan36 did not give up his computer, and his biblical knowledge was low, and he was a hypocrite, and a fraud and a liar! God: Really? What does that got to do with your decision to accept jesus or not? You: well, I.....I mean...God: pal, you can only answer for yourself! To the eternal fire you shall go. You had your chance, you wasted it!! But I believed in mary and guadalupe! God: I know mary, but she didn't die on the cross!!! to eternity now!!
@cuzcatlan36 Look. I've heard the Evangelical nonsense before and I don't believe it. I've investigated it very thoroughly and I find it to be untrue. Totally untrue, hyprocritcal, and un-Biblical. What do you want from me? I'm not here to debate you on Christianity. You aren't qualified to debate me since you have only the vaguest grasp of Christian life.
I'm just trying to point out that, by commonly used term "Christian," Cortés was a Christian. Is that so difficult for you to understand?
@shantonu9 Did He mean we must "hate" our family? NO, of course not. He simply meant that anything that stands in the way of God being first in our lives must be discarted, be it "riches"( which you seem to be obsessed with) family, friends, etc. Now, am I advocating the "get rich" message of some TV evangelists? NO, of course not. That's a false message(just like catholicism). The main purpose of the church is to tell of the good news of Jesus( not mary). On the other hand Jesus did talk about
@shantonu9 being easier for a camel to enter through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter heaven, and we have the example of Lazarus the poor man and the rich man. In both instances God wanted to point out the danger of placing our focus on things of this earth. But all of this boils down to our hearts, and where we place God in it. Does it mean God wants us to be poor and miserable? No, of course not! Take a look at Adam and Eve, God gave them everything they needed, God did not
@cuzcatlan36 intend men kind to toil and suffer, that came about when we chose to sin against Him. Nor does He demand of us to "punish" our selves, live in shack, give up our computers, and have leprousy! What He demands is our hearts, our souls, our minds, our time, our priority. A computer is a tool, I could give it up, but does God care about me having a computer, NO of course not, Does He care that the computer might take center stage and cause me to sin against Him, YES HE DOES!
@cuzcatlan36 You can spin it any way you want it to cover up your hypocrisy and lies. You said that to be a Chirstian you had to immitate Christ. But you haven't done that. You haven't immitated Christ's early followers (all of whom were martyred or risked martyrdom). You haven't done a thing. And you won't because in your perverse interpretation, you don't have to. All you have to do is "accept Jesus." What a joke you are! You fail by your own definition and now you want to change it. LOL!
as false. When you strip away the glory of God to allow "traditions" and erroneous beliefs to replace His holly word, then we change His message. That makes us liars, and lying is of Satan. Therefore, our alligiance is to satan. Therefore, we are not "christians". Just because a religion "uses" biblical vocabulary doesn't mean they are 'christians'. Christianity is a relationship with a person, in which Jesus takes center stage, and if "mary" gets involved, you now have 2 gods. God is one.
@cuzcatlan36 These are your own words, hyprocrite: "A follower of Christ-this individual by virtue of being a follower IMMITATES his master, LIVES as his master, BELIEVES as his master."
Well for you and your twisted version of Christianity, ONE out of THREE ain't bad! LOL. You are such a funny joke, you and your silly Protestanstism. [Notice how easy it is to expose you as a non-Christian. This is why I insited that we use a neutral source like wikipedia, but you prefered to be ridiculed.]
I wonder how much of this is true since it is seen through the white mans eyes and said through the white mans mouth. I think American history needs to be rewritten.
@l1lfr3sa Judging on your grammar you must be a regular rhode scholar at Oxford University with a major in Meso- American pre-Colombian civilizations, or maybe you are one of the top archaeologists in the world. Just because you don't like what your hearing don't attack it and claim it is false I think the BBC knows more on the subject than you and has more resources at it's disposable, the BBC has the best reputation in the world for it's broadcasting excellence what are your credentials.
QUETZALCOATL AKA JESUS CHRIST HAS OFFSPRING AND I HAVE SPOTTED THEM ON THE INTERNET AND TELEVISION AND IN PUBLIC AND LIKE HIM THEY ARE EVIL, EVEN THOUGH THEY MAY NOT APPEAR TO BE, THEY WILL NOT ESCAPE THE SMOKING MIRROR THAT KNOWS THE TRUTH. QUETZALCOATL WILL USE HIS OFFSPRING IN THE GUISE OF "DO GOODERS" TO TRY AND LEAD THE MASSES TO THEIR DEATHS!!!! MY NAME IS LEYLA ERGUN I AM A MESSENGER CHOSEN BY GOD-THE CREATOR OUR MAKER ON THE 22-09-2010
@xxxEmmureOwnxxx Books such as secrets of the ancient Americas..Lost Rhealms.and I belive lost planets or algo great books however alot of history is written by the white man..so one must dig deeper! But you have a great point!
I believe they had a leader or two and the craziness of those priests or bosses defined them: crazy ass society, you can't be advanced and sacrifice people.
The first thing to understand Aztecs, is to forget about etnocentrism: for they life and dead, as all their universe, had a totally different meaning. Occidental world: aztecs, muslims, hinduist, africans are NOT WRONG, they are just DIFFERENT.
love this imformation...next time a native indian tells me my spanish forefathers were evil and killers and this and that I am going to tell them their aztec anscestors killed and made human sacrifices in the estimation of hundreds of thousands...they also sold their own native american people to slavery and took slaves...I am tired of being acused of crimes my ancient forefathers committed while they are acused of nothing over their forefathers...we have evolved since this!
@lucy9359 you make me think of every time an african american has told me that its my "peoples" fault they were enslaved since im white. this always makes me laugh because it was their ancestors, not them, and also because im irish--my ancestors were in Ireland, and when they came to America they were descriminated too!
the aztecs were lucky to die of small pox otherwise they would have incurred the wrath of the spanish empire. they would not have stood a chance and would have been annilhilated. their evil reign was unpopular with their neighbors so it didnt take long for cortez to get support to conquer them. gold was necessary to pay for the decline of satan in the new world. satan in egypt was wasted now it was aztecs turn.
@mitomke Of course. Praise the Spaniards for giving the natives of mexico the gifts of disease, war, and slavery. Even before Cortes committed his coup, Aztecs and others were converting in droves. They liked the order and rationality of Christianity over the chaos and randomness and self-contradiction of their own religion. It could have been the same as the conversion of Pagan Europe: peaceful conversion via missionaries. But that would mean no glory for Cortes. No gold for Spain.(cont)
@grufle1906 Cortes acted out of greed and pride, two very UNChristian qualities, and replaced a vibrant, prosperous people with a nation of slaves. Human sacrifice was only one part of Aztec culture, and there were many qualities, such as social mobility, state welfare, urban sanitation, etc. that the Spanish could have learned from the Aztecs. Finally, the Spanish could NOT have conquered the Aztecs without smallpox. Before small pox, the Spansih were routed during the Noche Triste. (cont)
@grufle1906 After smallpox, it still took the spanish a 90 day siege to take tenochtitlan. European arms were not so much more effective than those of the aztecs, or the rest of the world (as can be seen by resistance in Ethiopia) until the industrial revolution. I think that if someone besides Moctecuhtzoma had ruled Tenochtitlan, the political situation would have been less hostile. Many enjoyed the protection the aztec armies provided combined with their respect for autonomy, (cont)
@grufle1906 providing freedom and stability. The spaniards came in the transition phase, when Moctecuhtzoma was trying to centralize the empire. His coup against Texcoco and imposition of authority on several previously autonomous territories such as the Totonacs made them into enemies. If Spain had come 20 years earlier or 20 years later, the Aztecs and their allies would have desroyed them. If not them, they would weaken them enough so that the more centralized Tzintzuntzan would have won.
@grufle1906 I do sympathize with your view of many of the Spanish as ruthless butchers but a few of the missionaries risked their lives to protect the natives. It is a shame that much of the records of the Aztecs were destroyed. I am very interested in learning of the origin of the Aztecs beyond the myth of Aztlan. The Aztecs were similar to the Spanish in one way in their relations to their neighbors. Gold is currency and that is necessary for any conquest.
Sow the wind and reap the whirlwind. He who lives by the sword, dies by it. God abhors human sacrifice. Empires and cultures which have practiced human sacrifice have had horrible ends. The civilizations of Mesoamerica were only one of th
imagine if the aztecs defeated cortez and stole their technology and created cites like these all across north america!
sputnik11111 4 hours ago
i doubt they killed more people than the state of texas
TheSonyb90 3 weeks ago
So much for the open borders We are all happy Natives that got along peacefully.People are people and this vid proves that the whole Mexica-Azlatan myth is full of b.s.
calman1951 2 months ago
Comment removed
1coolguysuper 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Mexico is part of North America *facepalm*
Mr1helluvabutlr 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
To learn your old heritage of modern day hispanic/ latino, We are Nikan Tlaka.."meaning we the people here" NATIVES dark skin, light skin, All we know is white history, Its good 2 know ours too no matter what they say, It will make great in change your life and make u proud visit these sites that speak for all central, south, americans with Indigenous roots MEXICAUPRISING. NET MEXICA-MOVEMENT. ORG theres many sites this MEXIKA aka aztec today was our last great empire..learn the truth. stay up
LPdANDYz 2 months ago
@aaronamccoy that fucken piece of shit don't even deserve to be Latin....
MrHollis831 2 months ago
richard ramirez must of been aztec
aaronamccoy 2 months ago
@aaronamccoy because it's part of north america. that's why it has so many treaties with canada and usa
sixpointneuf 2 months ago
Demons EXIST! That is the least Proof which can show us that all these Religions and holy books are TRUE!. We have SEEN THINGS! We have DONE! In MODERN TIME! I have visited many people who ARE ALIVE and NOT old neither Religios who have witnesed many things, HUGE things that maybe u laugh about! But they are TRUE. We humans NEVER believe until the thing happens us! Why? It is better to analyse and believe because Hundreds of Thousends of people DON'T LIE.
xOxKurdParstxOx 3 months ago
@xOxKurdParstxOx I can't understand your bad english.... Write correctly.
Horrorlord1 3 months ago
@xOxKurdParstxOx As I just said. There are supernatural things, but not flying attention whore's on clouds. We don't know what they are, but they definately aren't something someone made up. The human was never meant to know much or travel far. We live on an island of ignorance, surrounded by the black seas of infinity, and the mists of time.
Horrorlord1 3 months ago
@Horrorlord1 This COMMENT Was NICE! "The Island of Ignorance surrounded by Black seas" YEAH 100% Right! For the first time, I love my enemies comment.
xOxKurdParstxOx 3 months ago
@xOxKurdParstxOx Well thank you very much! Let's stop arguing, I'm off to watch madventures!
Horrorlord1 3 months ago
Ironically, the word Demon came from the greeks. A demon was never a bad spirit. But a low spirit. Much like us humans, thus, are we the demons the Gods fear?
pdeleon9 3 months ago
only Demons desire and love human secrefices! Still in large parts of the world (Middle East,India,Asia...) the wizards call on great Demons to perform big tasks for them! They secrefice meat and such things! but the wizards say: The Noble-King demons need Human-secrefise who wre too powerful, therefore we can not call on them to come and use them for private tasks! Aztect Ideas=From Demons.
xOxKurdParstxOx 3 months ago
@xOxKurdParstxOx Christians used to sacrifice, kill people thinking otherwise by throwing rocks, hanging, and interrogating people if they knew any atheist or a "heretic" they could kill. There are no demons you brainwashed punk! Everyone is using you... The government, the church. Religion is used to control the masses, and slow humanity and advance down....
Horrorlord1 3 months ago
@Horrorlord1 There are No Demons? YOU IDIOT, That is the BIGGEST Bullshit of the time! I know many FUCK Atheist people or "Modern People" saying so! Just to show themselves. We all KNOW that they exist, I wish they hadn't but they do! I can GIVE YOU REAL TRUE events which have happened my relatives.... in Hunted houses... my aunts and uncles! and THEY ALL Are ALIVE and ALL NOT Religios!!!. One lies, 2 Lie, 100 lie...visit the Village near Dubai whose people has LEFT it because of Demons.
xOxKurdParstxOx 3 months ago
@Horrorlord1 Christians NEVER USED TO Sacrifice ANYONE! They used to EXECUTE people YES! Sacrifice and Execution are TWO Different things. So you say religions are LIE? which means MOSSES and his life story never TOOK place? Jeasus the same... so on?? YOU are lying to who? To yourself. ALL Peoples in ENTIRE world believed in spirits and such things! From continent to continent! They all had found such things! You say all of them were liars? and a scumbag like you is right?.
xOxKurdParstxOx 3 months ago
@xOxKurdParstxOx You see. You have NOTHING to back those things up. But you still blindlessly protect them because of your flying attention whore. That is why you will never be able to accept the truth...
Horrorlord1 3 months ago
@Horrorlord1 You are WHORE bitch, how dare u! The real whores LIE in West! Go check out ur women, all 55 years old who have changed 100000 men! 2 daughters with 2 different men and a new boyfriend at home! BITCH, Corrupt shit. Go learn life! What life is, since ur entire life is built on Prostitution. There is NO TRUTH that what I wrote! DEMONS EXIST (in every point of view)+Aztects were DEMONS themselves or supported by them!
xOxKurdParstxOx 3 months ago
@xOxKurdParstxOx Just check this video: Imagine if all atheists left america.
And stop being insultive to aztecs. Everything you don't believe "came from demons". How pathetic... They just loved their gods more than you seem to love yours...
And observing your bad writing, you are most seemingly a little kid who shouldn't use his parent's computer. Your parents have brainwashed you. WAKE UP!
Horrorlord1 3 months ago
@Horrorlord THIS TIME-------> AZTECS WERE DEMONS THEMSELVES! Now How u like it?
xOxKurdParstxOx 3 months ago
@xOxKurdParstxOx You still make no sense.... THERE ARE NO DEMONS! Ignorant cockroach! You believe in bedtime stories!
Horrorlord1 3 months ago
Comment removed
xOxKurdParstxOx 3 months ago
They were DEMONIC and the Demons led them to that place and gave them prophecy!.
xOxKurdParstxOx 3 months ago
The Hiden Empire? Or the SAVAGE empire? TOO nasty Too Demonic! The spaniards should burn these people to ashes!
xOxKurdParstxOx 3 months ago
Alot of my salvia trips have a strong aztek theme.
evildnalor 3 months ago
@AztecWolfx with who? whitey? What the fuck is that soppose to mean?
UrunIGun 3 months ago
@AztecWolfx Barbian have more than one meaning
gamezonic 3 months ago
THE EUROPEANS CAME COUGHED ONECE AND KILLED 50% OF THE POPULATION THEN CAME PSYPHILIS AND ETC
SHINYABOY 3 months ago
BORDERS DONT DIVIDE NATIVE PRIDE
SHINYABOY 3 months ago
I'm pretty sure the romans also considered the tribes of england to be pretty barbarous when they conquered them.
echoplex89 3 months ago
@AztecWolfx human sacrifices are not barbarian act?ofc its not barbarian act cause its act of a savages btw barbarian in translation means people who dont speak the same language as i do(ancient rome)
aimedbm 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hey!
If you like watching documentaries on youtube, visit my website which you can find on my youtube channel!
I have created a collection of links to interesting documentaries on subjects like the history and culture of nations, world war II, science and conspiracy theories!
Or simply select and copy the following lines into your browser's address bar:
MYHISTORYLINK
.
COM
MrFlohi 4 months ago in playlist Aztecs: Inside the hidden empire
whats the name of the song in the beginning?
GoogleVideo101 4 months ago
@AztecWolfx shut up you racist scum bag
claton95 4 months ago
@AztecWolfx Since when are latins concidered "whitey" The conquistadors are Spanish or latinos MO RON
clovenrick 4 months ago in playlist Empire
i think that this documental is totally wrong. i desagree 100 % there is no proof of what he is saying.
elqueandabaausente 4 months ago
Mexico is not in central america, BUT NORTH AMERICA.. SO THEY WERE THE MOST CIVILAZED CULTURE IN NORTH AMERICA.
damianedna1977 5 months ago
The Aztec Empire was one of the greatest is mesoamerica; along with the Mayans and Incas. It is truely sad that they are all gone. But the practice of subjecting conquered indian nations to brutal tribute in good and more importantly tribe members for sacrafice to the Aztec gods did much to undermine that greatness. Cortez? A gold hungry religious zealot who destroyed the Empire in the name of profit, religion, and king. I suppose to the Spanish, he was a hero, but certainly not the natives.
MountieFan16 5 months ago
@lmfaoatthat No it's not ok.
But really, if you are going to be a critic then maybe you shouldn't sound like a moron.
yesdnilw 5 months ago
Comment removed
yesdnilw 5 months ago
is aztecas :p
calimeromnz98 5 months ago
Typical white guy changing history callign things myths.
standupEFC 5 months ago
@shantonu9 and @cuzcatlan36 . Both of you, you're being ridiculous. God, no matter from what religion you come from, would want you to be debating over such a silly topic :)
emmyisthecoolest 5 months ago 2
why is it that cortez is rememberd as a hero or killing an entire city and way of life but the US is so evil for getting the natives onto reservasions?
3023301 5 months ago
@3023301 it was all for gold. manifest destiny was just a coverup....fuck europeans
koolkid25 5 months ago
@3023301 He is not remembered as a hero, this video is all wrong.
ChibbyTonx 5 months ago
Did the individual in the documentary say the Aztecs transformed themselves into rulers of the most powerful empire "Central America" had ever known...."THAT IS A GEOGRAPHICAL MISTAKE", that is DISRESPECTFUL.....
1Ddubs 5 months ago
@1Ddubs I agree with you. Central Mexico is not central America.
sixpointneuf 5 months ago 11
@sixpointneuf mexico is between north america and south america so how is it not central america???
ajsrocks100 2 months ago
@ajsrocks100 Mexico is part of North America, genius! How hard is it to look at a map?
PamPaxPampon 2 months ago
Comment removed
787FOEONE 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
JOSEDIAZ800 5 months ago
Our society is full of the followers of kana dajjal or andhak asur or antichrist. Qualities of kana dajjal (antichrist): Lies, betray and usury. Kaaf for kizb (lies), Faa for fareb (betray) and Raa for ribaa (usury or interest).
moinoshin 6 months ago
Killing your enemy is normal warfare, but killing your own people is insanity.
nashkita77 6 months ago 2
@AztecWolfx yeah funny, they were far more brutal then whites, in fact cortes when conquered the capital, ask to stop, but his native allies make a massacre. still cry?
mattvlad3 6 months ago
(Error 1:19) Aztecs did not begin in Central American, they expanded to central America (Guatemala) but they are not from Central America. This is a research error. The Aztecs are of Mayan Descent. The Mayans were the ones that expanded successfully all the way down central America.
anthonyontherocks 6 months ago
@anthonyontherocks Totally wrong about the Aztecs being of Mayan descent. Where do you get your facts? The Aztecs and the Maya are completely distinct groups. They have about as much in common as Chinese and Russians. There languages and culture are totally different. Have you ever been to a Maya or an Aztec site yourself?
Get your facts straight before you post nonsense. Read a book for fuck's sake.
shantonu9 6 months ago
No sir you are wrong. Think about it, your saying Aztecs flourished out of nowhere as a big tribe. Not only did they live VERY close to the Mayan civilization, who worshipped the same Gods, spoke similar languages, and resembled each other. The Aztecs left the Mayan world due to the politics of the time (land, food, water etc.) There are countless records that indicate their blood lines. Please do your research before you challange others. And by the way, russians are asians too.(Jail education)
anthonyontherocks 3 months ago
@anthonyontherocks I don't even remember what I said. I'm not sure what you're talking about. That isn't your fault. It's just that I forgot what I said. What was it?
Anyway, I don't think I ever said that Aztecs were totally unrelated to the Maya. But the Maya were a distinct people. And the languages are not similar at all. That's for sure: Maya and Nahuatl are completely different. They aren't even in the same language family, the way that French and Romaninan or Yucatec and Kiche are.
shantonu9 3 months ago
@anthonyontherocks Their languages are definitely NOT similar............ *Please do research before you challenge others.
davidjbeals 1 month ago
@supralex1 how dare u disrespect my culture if you think my ancestors were barbaric look at yours people die everyday from murder for no reason my people did it for the sun god so you can rot in the underworld were u belong
urango9 6 months ago
They were savage barbarians but interesting nontheless
supralex1 6 months ago
@supralex1 I beg to differ there, my friend. True, the whole human sacrifice thing was pretty brutal and barbaric. But they did what they did because of their beliefs. I don't don't think they did it simply for the sake of murdering someone....as weird as that sounds lol. However, they built a city the likes of which had NEVER been seen by anyone in Europe. The Spanish killed them mercilessly, as well as with disease. In reality, were they any better?
cntbzkt 6 months ago
who built the city.?? its so crazy. i want to learn about those people
AMERICANPRISONER 6 months ago
@AztecWolfx all are barbarians, period!
Sibbot 7 months ago
FALSE. Never lived in fear? Mexican people are Beautiful; In every way.
Please intelligent comments only apply.
MrArch21 7 months ago
@MrArch21
Mexican people live in absolute fear.
CSATexan 6 months ago
filthy barbarians, anyone who kills to stone, wooden idols or whatever is going straight to hell, and we have to thank the spaniards for sending a lot of those bastards on an early trip to it!!!
cuzcatlan36 7 months ago
@cuzcatlan36 Killing to a book written by man is more acceptable I presume.
AztecPrideX 6 months ago
@AztecPrideX The Spaniards killed for a lot of reasons, non of which, had to do with God or His word in the Bible. They were catholics, therefore, non-christians, for catholics worship idols made of wood and stone( just like the aztecs) with the only difference that their idols were meant to be biblical people such as mary, the apostles and others. Even if you were to insist on calling them "christian" their practice, and dogma contradicted everything that Jesus taught!!
cuzcatlan36 6 months ago
@cuzcatlan36 Are you stupid? Why would you say that Catholics are non-Christians? It's the oldest Christian sect? Look it up in any encyclopedia. Were you born stupid or did your mother drop you as a baby?
shantonu9 6 months ago
@shantonu9 Funny you use the word stupid, because you are about to be proven to be the stupid one. Jesus' disciples were the first Christians. Catholics were born in the year 150. This is 121 years after the death of Jesus. The catholic religion became what it is around the year 600. What distinguishes catholicism from real Christianity is huge. Catholicism is a blend of pagan and Biblical themes. First off, the forgiveness of sins in catholicism is attributed to priests, when in the Bible it..
cuzcatlan36 6 months ago
belongs to God himself. Jesus becomes a "second" or "minor" god in catholicism, when in the Bible HE is God himself. Catholicism worships mary, the apostles and others, in the Bible only God merits worship. Baptism in the Bible is a symbol of salvation, in catholicism it literally "saves" plus what they practice is not actually baptism but rantism(sprinkling) which is of pagan origin. the last supper in catholicism is the literal body and blood of Jesus they eat, in the Bible is just a symbol..
cuzcatlan36 6 months ago
Their insistance on salibacy for priests is non biblical, for God instituted marriage and God said that it is not good for men to be alone. Catholics hold the pope to be God's vicar(representative) on earth, the Bible says only Jesus is. Catholics believe they can be forgiven after death, the Bible says we only get one chance as long as we are alive. Catholics believe in salvation by good deeds, God says it is by grace and only through Jesus. That's why Catholics are not Christians.
cuzcatlan36 6 months ago
@cuzcatlan36 I'm not going to get into a petty quarrel with you about who is and who is not a Christian. The point is that you don't get to decide who is and who isn't. The community at large does. And the community of scholars and experts leaves no doubt that Catholics are Christians. Whether they follow your particular (and erroneous) definition of Christianity does not matter at all. All you are doing is quoting Paul out of context. "God" says nothing of the kinds.
shantonu9 6 months ago
@shantonu9 petty is not. and you're right I don't get to decide, God does( not the community) nor scholars or "experts" for Christianity is beyond theirs or your understanding(it's a spiritual thing you don't get). Catholicism is diametrically opposed to the Bible, to God himself, and to the Christ. What do you know of context? If you had actually read the Bible you would not defend catholicism!!! there's no "particular" christianity, there's only "Jesus' Christianity"
cuzcatlan36 6 months ago
@cuzcatlan36 Why don't we just look it up on Wikipedia? Isn't that a fair thing to do? I mean, I'm not interested in your version, you're not interested in mine. Why don't we just turn to some neutral source to find out?
I don't think that Wikipedia is the answer for everything. But in this case, isn't that a fair thing to do? We are talking about terminology here, not the specifics of your personal belief. Right? Shouldn't we therefore look at how the word "Christian" is actually used?
shantonu9 6 months ago
@shantonu9 You want to look for the word of the CREATOR of the universe in Wikipedia??? How can wikepedia possibly help you define a spiritual encounter with the ONLY savior of menkind? How can that help you realize that you are saved because of what Jesus did in the cross, and not your "good" deeds. How can wekepedia tell you that Mary was not the mother of God, for God has no mother, in fact mary was a sinner just as you and I, and that Mary does not intercede for us, ONLY JESUS???
cuzcatlan36 6 months ago
@cuzcatlan36 Listen my dear friend, this is exactly the kind of debate I do not want to have. You have your interpretation, and I have mine. I am just saying that, as the word is commonly used, "Christian" applies to Catholics as well as Evangelicals. This is true whether or not Catholics meet your personal definition.
If we just use your personal interpretation of scripture we can't get anywhere in the discussion because not everyone shares your interpretation. Isn't that obvious?
shantonu9 6 months ago
@shantonu9 A term must have a definition. Weather history books, encyclopedias, and even fellow evangelicals accept the inclusion of catholics as christians doesn't mean that is the correct definition. Lets start with "Christian": A follower of Christ-this individual by virtue of being a follower IMMITATES his master, LIVES as his master, BELIEVES as his master. When we compare the catholic dogma to the scriptures, this simple definition of "christian" simply falls apart, rendering such belief
cuzcatlan36 6 months ago
@cuzcatlan36 Okay, let's use your definition to see if you are a Christian. Do you imitate and live as Christ did? If so, have you given away your earthy possessions (like your computer) to live among the poor and diseased contantly trying to minister to them?
Oh you haven't. I guess you're not a Christian by your own definiton.
shantonu9 6 months ago
@shantonu9 The definition I gave earlier stands. First, Yes I do as Christ did. Secondly, giving away possesions is not what Christianity is about, for it is not about "doing" and achieving heaven through my own deeds. Jesus knew that the young man's heart was bound by earthly posessions, and not the kingdom of God. It is through the deeds of Jesus that I am saved. By grace and not deeds says Paul. His salvation is perfect, and it is final and secure because it belongs to Him, not my effort.
cuzcatlan36 6 months ago
@cuzcatlan36 What a joke, you hyprocrite! Go back and read your own words. You are changing your *own definition* so that it suits your easy middle class lifestyle.
Keep your interpretion to yourself! I can judge you by your fruits. When you move to Bolivia to work with the poor, then I will give your interpretation some respect. But don't go around saying "this person is not a Christian because they don't believe what I believe." Fix your own house, then worry about what's wrong with others.
shantonu9 6 months ago
@shantonu9 Oh, I see, you're talking about the posessions business. That's your catholic mind talking. I stand by what I said. Your catholic upbringing tells you, you must "perform" duties to earn points in heaven. The Bible must be taken in context and as a whole!! Martirdom, doing good deeds, this and the other will not "make you" a christian. Now, faith produces "works", and a life consistent with the truth, you do "works" because you are saved, not because you can earn salvation.
cuzcatlan36 6 months ago
@cuzcatlan36 I'm just using your *own words.* To be a Christian is to immitate Christ and to live as he did. YOU said, not me.
I guess you're not woman enough to stand by your own words, which is very sad.
I really feel sorry for you because you don't even realize what a liar and a hyprocrite you truly are. Look within yourself and compare your life of luxury to that of Christ's, and then answer (to God, not to me) whether you think you are faithfully and honestly following Christ's path.
shantonu9 6 months ago
@shantonu9 Your catholic mind does not comprehend that to "imitate Jesus and live like Him" transcends mere material possesions and instead takes us into the realm of the spiritual. What mattered most to Jesus? answer:Love. He wanted His followers to spread the gospel that He showed them, Love, Salvation, and undying commitment against sin. Did Jesus oppose financial well being? A: No. Several of His followers were wealthy. Would being poor make you a better Christian? A:NO.
cuzcatlan36 6 months ago
@cuzcatlan36 Name one of Jesus's 12 disciples that was wealthy. When did Jesus EVER talk about financial well being? You are a liar! You said one thing and now you want to avoid the consequences of it. You know deep down that you are are a fraud. You said that you had to IMITATE Jesus, but no, not literally, because that would mean giving up your posessions, and that would be very hard wouldn't it? So you twist the meaning of your words so that they mean whatever you want them to mean. LOL!
shantonu9 6 months ago
@shantonu9 "Luke" was a physician, so he was a man of means. God gave Solomon his riches, and David, and Job, and Abraham. They were men after God's own heart and they were wealthy!! Since Jesus was and is God, was He contradicting himself when He told the rich young man to give up his wealth and follow him? NO, of course not, He was talking about PRIORITIES!!! What is first in our lives, Him or something else. He also said that we must repudiate our parents and friends in order to follow him..
cuzcatlan36 6 months ago
@cuzcatlan36 You are a real joke and a liar and a fraud.
You said, "Jesus did not oppose financial well being" and that "several of his followers were wealthy."
So then I asked you to name one of his 12 disciples that was wealthy. And I also asked you to point to a single scripture where Jesus himself talked about wealth in a positive manner.
And guess what? Just like the exposed fraud that you are, you evaded and avoided the questions. Don't be a coward and a fraud: answer the questions!
shantonu9 6 months ago
@shantonu9 Did Jesus ever talk about obtaining finacial well being? NO, He didn't. The mayority of his followers were poor, only Luke was probably the exception. Jesus spoke about the need to share our blessings with others and the responsibilty of such blessings, an example was the parable of the talents. God(Jesus) created the world and everything in it was laid upon the feet of men. Wealth is not the problem, your heart is.
cuzcatlan36 6 months ago
@cuzcatlan36 I hope you realize that Luke was not one of Jesus's disciples and there is no Biblical evidence that he knewJesus personally.
You define Christianity as following Jesus and you admit that he never speaks of wealth highly. Instead of following Jesus's teachings, e.g. Luke 6:24. you go ahead and acumulate wealth, in contradiction of those teachings.
Yet, while fail to be a Christian by your own definition, you boldly claim that Catholics aren't Christians. Frankly, you're a mess.
shantonu9 6 months ago
@shantonu9 Don't worry about me being a fraud or liar, worry about your own soul cause right now you are heading for hell cause you don't know Jesus and you have no salvation certainty as I do. Your catholic dogma blinds you to the truth of Jesus, and instead you worship " la virgen de guadalupe", idols made of wood, plaster or what have you, directly contradicting God himself when He said: "Thou shall have no other gods before me" your prayers are not heard cause you pray to demons.
cuzcatlan36 6 months ago
@cuzcatlan36 Your threats of hell and damnation don't scare me. You've proven time and again that you haven't really studied the Bible very carefully. You seem to think that you have all the answers. But it should be obvious that you really don't even know how to ask the right questions.
For someone who clearly knows so little, and has such feeble command of both logic and the Biblical text, your arrogance regarding the nature of Christianity is truly astounding.
shantonu9 6 months ago
@shantonu9 Threats? How can I possibly threaten you by stating a fact. If I say a car is coming, that's no threat, it's simply stating the obvious. But if you want to speak of threats, think of "time" as a real threat. You may die tonight or 80 years from now, either way, you will face your maker, and your maker will not be "la virgen Morena" it will be God who has NO mother. The question will be: "did you accept Jesus as Savior and Lord while you were alive?" I hope your answer will not be..
cuzcatlan36 6 months ago
@cuzcatlan36 You aren't stating facts idiot. You are stating your opinon. And I don't agree with it. I could easily say you're going to hell, and a Jew or a Muslim could easily say the same thing to both of us.
You have your interpretation of the Bible. I think it's wrong. I've used your own definition to clearly show that you aren't a Christian.
Don't you see the futility of this discussion? That is why I said we should look to a neutral source like an encyclopedia. But you don't want reason.
shantonu9 6 months ago
@shantonu9 First you debate me on what is a "christian" I tell you what a Christian is, and then you want to go outside of the word of God to find what a "christian" is in an encyclopedia? Would a muslim look for what a muslim is outside the Koran? Rediculous. You started defending Catholicism that you claim to be a "christian" religion, but you want outside definitions? What exactly do you believe? I'll tell you, you don't know what you believe! You don't believe the Bible because you...
cuzcatlan36 6 months ago
@cuzcatlan36 Get this through your skull. You are not qualified to tell me what a Christian is or isn't. You've changed your own definition about six times in two days. Do you understand how totally stupid you are?
Christianity is more than the Bible. It is also the traditions that were passed down directly from the first Apostles, including St. Peter. Do you celebrate Christmas? When do you celebrate it? What day? Is that from the Bible? No, but it's a tradition that Christans have.
shantonu9 6 months ago
@shantonu9 Actually, I am qualified to tell YOU what a "christian" IS. why, you may wonder? Because I have been Saved by His grace, and there is only one way to be a Christian, and that is accepting the CHRIST(Savior) of God(Him in human form) "Christianity is more than the Bible" ????? Truly, satan has your heart!! You take "CHRIST" out of christian, and super impose TRADITIONS over God's own word!!! Men's traditions nontheless!!! That is WHY catholicism is NOT christianity!!!! NOT CHRISTIANI
cuzcatlan36 6 months ago
@cuzcatlan36 Whatever. You can't keep your own definition straight in your head. First you said to be a Christian one had to "immitate" Jesus and "live" as Jesus did. Those are your own words.
Now, it's something different. Now it's "being saved" by Jesus.
You realize that you can't even maintain a consistent defintion for two consecutive days? Come on. You should admit that you too stupid to understand scripture and you need guidance. Otherwise you will continute to believe foolish lies.
shantonu9 6 months ago
@cuzcatlan36 And not only do you know nothing of Christianity, you also clearly know nothing about Judaism or Islam. Because of course Muslims look outside of the Koran (for example to the Hadith) to find out about Islam. Jews do the same with the oral tradition of the Talmud.
You just haven't studied enough to have the faintest idea of what you are talking about.
shantonu9 6 months ago
@shantonu9 your virgen de guadalupe will NOT intercede for you on judgenment day because i haven't yet come across any guadalupe on the bible. the little i know about the bible is simple: without JESUS you're gonna be toast cause i don't recall no guadalupe dying on the cross, nor God declaring "For God so Loved the world that He gave His only begotten 'daughter' "Guadalupe" so that anyone who so believeths in 'her' shall have everlasting life" If your catholic, you're gonna be in deep Trouble
cuzcatlan36 6 months ago
@cuzcatlan36 I'm not scared at all. You see, you aren't an authority. You barely understand the Bible that you read. You fail to live up to your own defintion of Christian (at least one of the various defintions you've proposed).
Anyone can see you're an ignorant fraud who wants to believe that you can go ahead and contradict the plain language of Jesus's teachings e.g., Mat. 16:13-20 and continue to cast stones at fellow Christians for what you believe are their failings! You are a joke!
shantonu9 6 months ago
@shantonu9 Looks like you're gonna search for God in an encyclopedia, and I will continue to learn from Him in the Bible. You will worship mary and the apostles( and asorted mexican deities) and I will trust in Jesus. I certainly don't know enough to lecture you, but for you to ignore the lectures of the Bible would be truly tragic. Since you are the "christian" one, and I am not, I hope your traditions and all the combined idols you worship can do something for you in this life, cause the next
cuzcatlan36 6 months ago
@cuzcatlan36 Listen my brother, what I am trying to say to you (a bit harshly and for that, I am sorry) is that the Bible needs to be understood in the correct light. That light is provided by 2000 years of interpretion by the Church. It is not always right, but it is a good guide and better than doing it on your own.
I want to be forceful with you because Evangelicals are also forceful and you probably have not heard someone forcefully defend the Church. May our Lord Jesus Christ be with you.
shantonu9 6 months ago
@cuzcatlan36 By the way, I think of you as a fellow beliver. I may have used harsh language, and I am sorry for that, especially if i have offended you.
I'm just trying to get you to be humble and see that there is more than one way to look at things. You've probably been taught just one thing. I was born a Catholic, then I became an Evangelical, then I returned to the Catholic Church. I do not say that the Church is without fault. But you should not be saying Catholics aren't Christians.
shantonu9 6 months ago
@shantonu9 Can a catholic become a Christian? YES, of course. How? You must reject the catholic dogma? WHY? Because Catholicism denies the supremacy of Christ! How does it do that? By twisting the truth of the nature of Jesus and His Salvation. Jesus says you are saved by faith, catholics: by good deeds. Jesus:repent while there is time(life). catholics: a priest can pray away sins when you are already dead. Jesus is vicar, not pope. no pope in Bible. Perverting the word is a sin.
cuzcatlan36 6 months ago
@cuzcatlan36 My friend and brother. Catholics are Christians. We read the same Bible and pray to the same God as you do. We just have a different intpretation of Scripture. You haven't studied enough to understand why we intrepret it the way we do. I feel sorry for you that you are so close-minded and indoctrinated by false rumors about the Church. But all I can do is pray that God will open your eyes to the truth and wish you well. I was, after all, exactly like you.
shantonu9 6 months ago
@shantonu9 you believe in historical traditions and rituals, but you don't know God personally or His word. You want to define "christianity" as a mathematical formula. Only in the Bible can you find who and what is a "Christian". Some subjects are oppened to interpretation in the Bible, but there are universal truths that can not be altered. One of them is that ONLY JESUS(God) can save. Hell is a mathematical certainty without Him.
cuzcatlan36 6 months ago
@cuzcatlan36 You just don't know enough to lecture me. Sorry. You clearly don't have a very good command of the Bible. You aren't able to match my understanding of Scripture. I very easily exposed the contradictions and hypocrisies inherent in your own definition and the way you lead your life. Yet, you persist with your silly threats.
Why should I believe a single word you say, or trust your bizzare interpretations, when you fail to be Christian by your own definition?
shantonu9 6 months ago
@shantonu9 "I didn't accept Jesus because Cuzcatlan36 did not give up his computer, and his biblical knowledge was low, and he was a hypocrite, and a fraud and a liar! God: Really? What does that got to do with your decision to accept jesus or not? You: well, I.....I mean...God: pal, you can only answer for yourself! To the eternal fire you shall go. You had your chance, you wasted it!! But I believed in mary and guadalupe! God: I know mary, but she didn't die on the cross!!! to eternity now!!
cuzcatlan36 6 months ago
@cuzcatlan36 Look. I've heard the Evangelical nonsense before and I don't believe it. I've investigated it very thoroughly and I find it to be untrue. Totally untrue, hyprocritcal, and un-Biblical. What do you want from me? I'm not here to debate you on Christianity. You aren't qualified to debate me since you have only the vaguest grasp of Christian life.
I'm just trying to point out that, by commonly used term "Christian," Cortés was a Christian. Is that so difficult for you to understand?
shantonu9 6 months ago
@shantonu9 Did He mean we must "hate" our family? NO, of course not. He simply meant that anything that stands in the way of God being first in our lives must be discarted, be it "riches"( which you seem to be obsessed with) family, friends, etc. Now, am I advocating the "get rich" message of some TV evangelists? NO, of course not. That's a false message(just like catholicism). The main purpose of the church is to tell of the good news of Jesus( not mary). On the other hand Jesus did talk about
cuzcatlan36 6 months ago
@shantonu9 being easier for a camel to enter through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter heaven, and we have the example of Lazarus the poor man and the rich man. In both instances God wanted to point out the danger of placing our focus on things of this earth. But all of this boils down to our hearts, and where we place God in it. Does it mean God wants us to be poor and miserable? No, of course not! Take a look at Adam and Eve, God gave them everything they needed, God did not
cuzcatlan36 6 months ago
@cuzcatlan36 intend men kind to toil and suffer, that came about when we chose to sin against Him. Nor does He demand of us to "punish" our selves, live in shack, give up our computers, and have leprousy! What He demands is our hearts, our souls, our minds, our time, our priority. A computer is a tool, I could give it up, but does God care about me having a computer, NO of course not, Does He care that the computer might take center stage and cause me to sin against Him, YES HE DOES!
cuzcatlan36 6 months ago
@cuzcatlan36 You can spin it any way you want it to cover up your hypocrisy and lies. You said that to be a Chirstian you had to immitate Christ. But you haven't done that. You haven't immitated Christ's early followers (all of whom were martyred or risked martyrdom). You haven't done a thing. And you won't because in your perverse interpretation, you don't have to. All you have to do is "accept Jesus." What a joke you are! You fail by your own definition and now you want to change it. LOL!
shantonu9 6 months ago
as false. When you strip away the glory of God to allow "traditions" and erroneous beliefs to replace His holly word, then we change His message. That makes us liars, and lying is of Satan. Therefore, our alligiance is to satan. Therefore, we are not "christians". Just because a religion "uses" biblical vocabulary doesn't mean they are 'christians'. Christianity is a relationship with a person, in which Jesus takes center stage, and if "mary" gets involved, you now have 2 gods. God is one.
cuzcatlan36 6 months ago
@cuzcatlan36 These are your own words, hyprocrite: "A follower of Christ-this individual by virtue of being a follower IMMITATES his master, LIVES as his master, BELIEVES as his master."
Well for you and your twisted version of Christianity, ONE out of THREE ain't bad! LOL. You are such a funny joke, you and your silly Protestanstism. [Notice how easy it is to expose you as a non-Christian. This is why I insited that we use a neutral source like wikipedia, but you prefered to be ridiculed.]
shantonu9 6 months ago
I wondered about my people.... Brings me a step closer to the origin...
BUT, they just mention the nomads had ancestors... and seen the city pre-built and adopted the gods.
Search further down the rabbit hole, I guess
HatterMadigan 7 months ago
I appreciate uploads like this. It really helps me when studying to retain information.
shondawanders 7 months ago
thank you this is very helpful and it has alot of info,i give this a thumbz up!!!!!!!
blacountkippkaocom 7 months ago
This is bull.
HalfMunzookan 7 months ago
What kind of fucking nerds argue over an Aztec documentary.
Therapster 7 months ago
@Therapster
Uh...nerds into Aztec shit?
kennykyle133 7 months ago
@Therapster You do realise this is total misinformation, right?
ELEMENT1111100 7 months ago
@Therapster people that know about their roots...
peace6311 7 months ago
I wonder how much of this is true since it is seen through the white mans eyes and said through the white mans mouth. I think American history needs to be rewritten.
bim971 8 months ago
@bim971 The winners write the history, just look a the Roman description of the huns...
Prussiaaccount 8 months ago
@bim971 and wtf has race got to do with it? shut your nigger mouth.
lairymark21 7 months ago
@lairymark21 I wish you knew me so you could shut it up.
bim971 7 months ago
first most of their infor is wrong sencond the narrortor cant prenouns any of the names and third they twisting up the information.
l1lfr3sa 8 months ago 15
@l1lfr3sa and third your grammar sucks .... also I think you meant their.
ValiantATHLETE 6 months ago
@l1lfr3sa Thanks. I was reaaaallly close to wasting 40+ minutes on this.
halfhigh 6 months ago
@l1lfr3sa Judging on your grammar you must be a regular rhode scholar at Oxford University with a major in Meso- American pre-Colombian civilizations, or maybe you are one of the top archaeologists in the world. Just because you don't like what your hearing don't attack it and claim it is false I think the BBC knows more on the subject than you and has more resources at it's disposable, the BBC has the best reputation in the world for it's broadcasting excellence what are your credentials.
MrAndrzej24 6 months ago
@l1lfr3sa Go back to the third grade and learn how to spell.
yesdnilw 5 months ago
@yesdnilw he probably mistyped on the keyboard calm the fuck down, it not school, it the internet, am alowed tou mak a mestake is da ohk?
lmfaoatthat 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
QUETZALCOATL AKA JESUS CHRIST HAS OFFSPRING AND I HAVE SPOTTED THEM ON THE INTERNET AND TELEVISION AND IN PUBLIC AND LIKE HIM THEY ARE EVIL, EVEN THOUGH THEY MAY NOT APPEAR TO BE, THEY WILL NOT ESCAPE THE SMOKING MIRROR THAT KNOWS THE TRUTH. QUETZALCOATL WILL USE HIS OFFSPRING IN THE GUISE OF "DO GOODERS" TO TRY AND LEAD THE MASSES TO THEIR DEATHS!!!! MY NAME IS LEYLA ERGUN I AM A MESSENGER CHOSEN BY GOD-THE CREATOR OUR MAKER ON THE 22-09-2010
GodChoseLeylaErgun 8 months ago
Aztecs could of easly rape the shit out of spanish, but due to their religion, a Old toltec god said he will return and retake his kindom....
Moctezuma was afriad, and so when cortez came, he look like the god quetzaoclt...
so it was a mix up.
xxxEmmureOwnxxx 8 months ago
@xxxEmmureOwnxxx Books such as secrets of the ancient Americas..Lost Rhealms.and I belive lost planets or algo great books however alot of history is written by the white man..so one must dig deeper! But you have a great point!
nlongor1 7 months ago
Me thinks far to many people have seen appocalypto and base their entire judgement on a people as sacraficing war lovers lol
meshmade 8 months ago
@meshmade and yes i realise that the film is based on the maya civilization
meshmade 8 months ago
I believe they had a leader or two and the craziness of those priests or bosses defined them: crazy ass society, you can't be advanced and sacrifice people.
Novinte 8 months ago
@Novinte they were pioneers of brain surgery, what have you done to move mankind further?
CheeseDefender1 8 months ago
The first thing to understand Aztecs, is to forget about etnocentrism: for they life and dead, as all their universe, had a totally different meaning. Occidental world: aztecs, muslims, hinduist, africans are NOT WRONG, they are just DIFFERENT.
MANUbjx 8 months ago
aztecs sacrifised the people from enemy tribes they captured,not their people,so there was no fear for the aztecs
suvremenebudale34 8 months ago
this documentary sucks... they dont know nothing.
georgemrr 8 months ago
deseases brought by the europian won the aztec impire. .. thats a fact. thats the only true...study the real history.
georgemrr 8 months ago
~THANK YOU FOR POSTING. I AM GRATEFUL FOR MY RESEARCH <3 :)
chiaspet 8 months ago
Which ethnic group originally inhabited Teotihuacan?
DontFlopMusic 9 months ago
@DontFlopMusic indian
yungeddakid 9 months ago
@yungeddakid no, it's Native Americans
Hackney2000 8 months ago
and the gringos call they selfs americans jajajaja when they came from europa
ever1217 9 months ago
love this imformation...next time a native indian tells me my spanish forefathers were evil and killers and this and that I am going to tell them their aztec anscestors killed and made human sacrifices in the estimation of hundreds of thousands...they also sold their own native american people to slavery and took slaves...I am tired of being acused of crimes my ancient forefathers committed while they are acused of nothing over their forefathers...we have evolved since this!
lucy9359 9 months ago
@lucy9359 you make me think of every time an african american has told me that its my "peoples" fault they were enslaved since im white. this always makes me laugh because it was their ancestors, not them, and also because im irish--my ancestors were in Ireland, and when they came to America they were descriminated too!
nero314100 9 months ago
Comment removed
lucy9359 9 months ago
@lucy9359 sir, you are crazy.
georgemrr 8 months ago
cool!
freyaabbas 9 months ago
the aztecs were lucky to die of small pox otherwise they would have incurred the wrath of the spanish empire. they would not have stood a chance and would have been annilhilated. their evil reign was unpopular with their neighbors so it didnt take long for cortez to get support to conquer them. gold was necessary to pay for the decline of satan in the new world. satan in egypt was wasted now it was aztecs turn.
mitomke 10 months ago
@mitomke Of course. Praise the Spaniards for giving the natives of mexico the gifts of disease, war, and slavery. Even before Cortes committed his coup, Aztecs and others were converting in droves. They liked the order and rationality of Christianity over the chaos and randomness and self-contradiction of their own religion. It could have been the same as the conversion of Pagan Europe: peaceful conversion via missionaries. But that would mean no glory for Cortes. No gold for Spain.(cont)
grufle1906 10 months ago
@grufle1906 Cortes acted out of greed and pride, two very UNChristian qualities, and replaced a vibrant, prosperous people with a nation of slaves. Human sacrifice was only one part of Aztec culture, and there were many qualities, such as social mobility, state welfare, urban sanitation, etc. that the Spanish could have learned from the Aztecs. Finally, the Spanish could NOT have conquered the Aztecs without smallpox. Before small pox, the Spansih were routed during the Noche Triste. (cont)
grufle1906 10 months ago
@grufle1906 After smallpox, it still took the spanish a 90 day siege to take tenochtitlan. European arms were not so much more effective than those of the aztecs, or the rest of the world (as can be seen by resistance in Ethiopia) until the industrial revolution. I think that if someone besides Moctecuhtzoma had ruled Tenochtitlan, the political situation would have been less hostile. Many enjoyed the protection the aztec armies provided combined with their respect for autonomy, (cont)
grufle1906 10 months ago
@grufle1906 providing freedom and stability. The spaniards came in the transition phase, when Moctecuhtzoma was trying to centralize the empire. His coup against Texcoco and imposition of authority on several previously autonomous territories such as the Totonacs made them into enemies. If Spain had come 20 years earlier or 20 years later, the Aztecs and their allies would have desroyed them. If not them, they would weaken them enough so that the more centralized Tzintzuntzan would have won.
grufle1906 10 months ago
@grufle1906 hey myatetumadretron your replying to yourself
zacatetas 9 months ago
@grufle1906 I do sympathize with your view of many of the Spanish as ruthless butchers but a few of the missionaries risked their lives to protect the natives. It is a shame that much of the records of the Aztecs were destroyed. I am very interested in learning of the origin of the Aztecs beyond the myth of Aztlan. The Aztecs were similar to the Spanish in one way in their relations to their neighbors. Gold is currency and that is necessary for any conquest.
mitomke 9 months ago
I would've love to see tenochtitlan
TheSololobo 10 months ago
All of the world's cultures have had people killed in the name of god
elbuenyi 10 months ago
@elbuenyi these people worshiped a god of the underworld that required a human blood sacrifice
TheRisingforce2000 10 months ago
iam proud of my aztecs ancesters,their blood run in my vains.
TheHidalmex 10 months ago
Sow the wind and reap the whirlwind. He who lives by the sword, dies by it. God abhors human sacrifice. Empires and cultures which have practiced human sacrifice have had horrible ends. The civilizations of Mesoamerica were only one of th