Censorship?

[tesharika]

You make some excellant points Bern, I was undecided on how to handle the leftys on my channel. I didn't initially want to delete their comments I wanted to be fair but if they are just going to disrupt things and try to drown out opinions- adios. I wondered why so often I see comments on your videos deemed as spam when they are clearly not. I knew you weren't marking them as as spam- all is clear now:)

[pinegrove33]

@tesharika S. no that's not me. I never mark anything as spam. I either delete, let stand and/or respond. Sometimes it's yt's software that sets that off and other times it's veiwers but it's never me.

[java501]

This channel is fantastic.

[TheNightBadger]

They would make men illegal if they could. They're already trying to decriminalize a woman killing her husband if she 'claims' he was violent to her. What woman who murders her husband would claim otherwise?

Also, Harriet's adviser on 'equality' has gone on record as saying "I hate all men and I always will". The moderates are always guided by the extremists in any organisation - not the other way round.

[themanonthestreet]

Exactly! Every hear of a white claiming that they hated all blacks and not get crucified? Matter-of-factly, even a subtle comment - or not so subtle - ala Don Imus - gets a white man crucified...

Ever hear of a man claim that he hated all women? Uhuh. Or that a womans place is XXX?

Exactly.... But a woman saying it is wellll.... you know... Strong and.... and... empowering!

TMOTS

[419scammerguy]

* I may not agree with your opinions but I will die defending your right to express them* or something like that...it's early and I am still sleepy :P Good video Bernard :)

[printo69]

Anyone who would subscribe to you with the intent of spamming the response board and purposely lowering the video rating has NO LIFE! I mean come on! How pathetic?

[ndependenthinkr]

Schop, the actions of Harmen and Smith are radical to me. How are they not? Denying men custody of their children...what's more radical than that? As for the prostitution....come on guys...you could buy a lady dinner and get laid..and it's probably cheaper....;0)~

[utubehayter]

so what is wrong? with prostitution? And the quality of sex that a prostitute can provide is better than that of an average lady anyway.

[utubehayter]

They want extremely poor women to die of hunger.. That means they are "killer feminists".

[Introspectre1]

Extremists of all stripes tend to consider themselves to be strong, and tend to view poor and disabled individuals as weak and unworthy,(If these people can't help them gain more power, then they're worthless!). It's just another sign of their narcissism, and perhaps of something a little more nihilistic.

[themanonthestreet]

Bernie bernie bernie.....

You MUST allow them their 'right' to put you in your place because women in the 1800s couldn't vote!

GESH!

TMOTS

[TheNightBadger]

"You MUST allow them their 'right' to put you in your place because women in the 1800s couldn't vote!"

Absolutely! Of course, try telling them that most men couldn't vote either and you hit a brick wall. Such a shame that women who had maids to clean the house, butlers to organise it, cooks to make dinner, nannies to look after the children, and husbands who paid for it all were so severely oppressed, right?

[themanonthestreet]

now now.... You just haven't read the "correct" herstory book tis all!

TMOTS

[TheNightBadger]

Ah yes... the gilded cage! How cruel of men to not let women work in manual industries like coal mines before there was any kind of regulations keeping them safe.

The problem Feminists have when describing the past is a common one: they can't contextualise it. They paint the picture of a world identical to this one only with more 'antique' technology and more 'oppression' (restriction is a more accurate word) of women...

[TheNightBadger]

... and they don't mention that those restrictions were there to protect women when the world was a very tough place indeed.

Before the modern world made everything cosy for ladies; disease, poverty, and the environment killed people in the west as rapidly as any modern African drought. It was never gender that restricted people's opportunities in life, it was then, and always will be - money. Wealth decided what you could and couldn't do: rich women had power - poor men didn't.

[sausage4mash]

feminist like I'm afraid most women do not hold honesty and integrity as core ideals , but I myself would try and rise above the games and open up the channel , but your channel Bernard ,your call , keep up the good work :)

[ArbalestEmerald]

Got to love the last part of the video. The whole thing is nothing more than a massive guilt trip to fool the naive.

[ndependenthinkr]

While I don't condone the actions of some of the "radicals" that comment on this channel, I have seen some pretty harsh comments posted about women that would lead them to believe that people who view this are women haters. And gather to do just that...hate women. Now with that said. These same people post unrelenting, demeaning comments about men. So unless they have something valuable to contribute, and a point to make, I say censor them!

[Individualism101]

What is the particular case against being a Radical? Surely it is the doctrine followed, and not the degree to which it is followed, that counts. Would any of you demonize a radical libertarian calling for the abolition of government intervention in the lives of individuals? Extremism or radicalism is simply the consistent application of principles held. A radical rationalist holds no unreasonable faith. A radical materialist believes only in material reality. And so on.

[Introspectre1]

I think the difference is that more moderate individuals, are willing to accept a consensus that minimizes harm to the society at large even if they don't get everything they want. Extremists on the other hand want EXACTLY what they want, will not allow consensus,in fact would rather imprison or destroy you than negotiate with you.

[jonvssocrates]

I've never seen a radical who was a good person. Feminist are no exception. I'm sure they don't see themselves as radicals, but then again, I doubt any radical sees themselves in that light.

Feminist are nothing more than broken people with sharp edges. They would be well served to spend a few years getting professional help.

Keep up the good work Chapin!

[Chevrobert]

Feminists are the worst for censoship. Why else would they use shaming language. They censor people by making them feel ashamed of their own veiws. Why else would they ask people like Argus if he hated women or worse accuse him of hating women when clearly he does not. There is no other reason to make such accusations especially when there is no evidence. Censor away Bernie if it is good enough for them why not you? Great vid.

[WestLake009]

It's cool how Bernard uses his intellect for authority but in a mild tempered way. In other words: "an iron fist in a velvet glove".

Keep it up Bern. 5*

[Introspectre1]

Yes, radical feminists speak the language of tolerance(To a point), and then proceed to do the opposite, very true, its amazing that they can carry on so long without taking a moment for self-examination, but I suppose they would only see what they want to see anyway...sigh.Well said Bernard.

[timbosforporn]

I hate that thumbs up and thumbs down crap. Ever since they put that in there my comments get -10 because I happen to agree with W on some things. At that point it gets pushed to the bottom where no one can see it. They need to get rid of it and if someone is abusive then it should be up the channel lord to get rid of them. I would much rather be in an enviroment of free abusive speech than no speech at all.