Have you ever heard of a gay couple that hurt the children they had? I don't. And I know why: because it's much harder to have a baby for gay than for "straight" couples, because while heterosexuals can have "accidents", homosexuals have to go a long way to be able to have a child. You don't hurt somebody you did so much for.
What I'm saying is: Homosexuals spend a lot more time thinking about whether they want a child or not, and that makes them better parents in many cases.
Hey frannol, you want to hear about a "broken family"? Talk to my husband. His dear sweet DADDY beat him mercilessly when he was a child! On a daily basis! When his mother tried to leave, DADDY threatened to find and kill his own sons just to spite her! And this was one of those "traditional" marriages that the neo-cons love to trumpet.
Don't you dare say that a Mommy and a Daddy make a perfect family. They do not. Let the gays marry. They might do a better job than the straights have.
I agree, these "straights" keep producing us gays!
SO technically people who have a problem with homosexuality should have a problem with heterosexuality as well...it's not like we're popping out all these gay children! :]
This is wonderful. I'm happy it's already been awarded, and hopefully many more awards will be on the way.
Anyone south of the Mason-Dixon line should ask their grandparents (or great-grandparents) to be candid about the race marriage laws of the 40s and 50s. The bible was used a lot to show that God didn't want people of different races to marry each other. I know this because my grandparents were brave enough to talk about it and admit to me that they were wrong.
Fair play to your grandparents! Your analogy is excellant. Just as the laws affecting the civil rights of people in South Africa and Northenr Ireland were wrong, so are these. Yet bigots continue to justify them!
In 20, 30 or 40 years time, will u have to admit to your childrent hat were the new form of the KKK at one point in your life!
Most conservatives define "unnatural" as anything that can not lead to procreation. So, they claim, if a sexual act does not lead to procreation it is wrong. However, many of them would have absolutely nothing to say about a woman having sex with a man after menopause... which can not lead to procreation.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I don't expect you to understand.. I hope you are well and in peace with your decision. I believe in God and his words and also believe that family is the base of a happy and healthy society, children have the right to be born, have caring and loving parents. Marriage should be between a man and a women. We already know the statistics of kids with broken families.. I
You are retarded. Children obviously require a parent of both sexes to be conceived, but you do realize that there are many children that are raised with single parents. Also homosexuality occurs naturally in nature. Saying they have a right to a mother and father means they have a choice, you would not be giving them a choice if you only allow them to have a mother and father. You should probably shut the fuck up.
Yes, it is quite possibe you've seen cover version of it made by Marriage Equality just recently - they run the campaign for same-sex marriage in Ireland (the vid is called 'Sinead's Hand (in marriage)' ) It's shot-for-shot, nicely done, with great music by Lisa Hannigan. Both videos are good as they are for a good cause! :)
I belive "rights" should be called rights if they are literally rights not something given to people only if they meet certain outrageous qualifications. Which is more like a priveledge since rights shouldnt be able to be taken away for mild things like sexuality.
I'm just happy with the fact gay sex offends so many people. . . that for me is reward enough. Have you ever seen a true homophobe squirm? . . . fucking priceless. Stop trying to be like the gaping maw and start burning churches down. jeeeze! Married?! Why?! Who gives a cunt?!
Were diffrent because we want rights you have as a straight person? Granted, there are times when gay people ARE seprate, but, things like marriage and being able to adopt, are rights you have, that we don't because of whom we love. Its no one's business who wants tp get married but those who are creating the union.
Very therapeutic to watch today after the the hypocrisy witnessed yesterday in California. Let's hope we see this on TV when the next campaign is in full swing.
If any of you haters on here can give me one NON RELIGIOUS REASON why gay marriage should not be allowed, please do it. We have a seperation of church and state in this country and I would liek for you to keep your RELIGIOUS VIEW out of my STATE rights. Thank you.
legalized homosexual marriage would not mean a church has to marry homosexuals. it means the state would be required to give them the same status that heterosexual couples get (including being able to say they are married). as there is a separation of church and state, the state cannot force churches to comply and churches should not influence the state's decision in this matter.
Way before the bible was written, a man named Plato wrote "[homosexuality] is regarded as shameful by barbarians and by those who live under despotic governments just as philosophy is regarded as shameful by them, because it is apparently not in the interest of such rulers to have great ideas engendered in their subjects, or powerful friendships or passionate love-all of which homosexuality is particularly apt to produce."
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
are you trying to insinuate it's out of context? the rest of Leviticus just talks about things you shouldn't do and that it's an abomination. unless you can prove otherwise, here it is, nice try! 23'(T)Also you shall not have intercourse with any animal to be defiled with it, nor shall any woman stand before an animal to mate with it; it is a perversion. 24'Do not defile yourselves by any of these things; for by all these (U)the nations which I am casting out before you have become defiled.
No, hypocrite... I'm not trying to insinuate anything other than ignorant people like yourself don't practice what you preach. Your flesh will burn as much as mine in hell. Is that clear enough for you? Dumbass.
By the way, you can spend the rest of your natural born days quoting scriptures... it makes no difference to me. You Christian fundamentalist are hypocrites and there is NO DIFFERENCE in you and fundamentalist MUSLIMS. Trying to force YOUR beliefs on the rest of the planet isn't going to work.
If we're listing Leviticus, you may want to re-read Lev 20:10 and Lev 4:22 - Why is Jim Bakker still alive, and did Ted Haggard properly sacrifice his goat?
I honestly don't think its our business if two people love each other if they are homosexual. It seems like a problem for them...as far as kids knowing about it, I want to know how many 12 year olds don't know about gay people already. There is gay culture everywhere, kids aren't safe anyways once they become teens, if you make it less controversial the naive will not be attracted to ideology solely based on the fact that "my mom and dad said its bad so it mustn't be". Good piece of video
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
This video fundamentally misunderstands that marriage is a public, as well as a private institution and as such is regulated by the State for such purposes. To attempt to so radically redefine marriage as same-sex "marriage" advocates are now attempting to do, and then claim that it is unfair when those defending natural marriage say "NO" shows a lack of understanding about the public purpose of marriage.
Marriage is available to every gay man and lesbian woman on the terms it has been offered.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Rather than leaving what amounts to little more than a bumper sticker cliche, why don't you explain what it is that I "misunderstand" about marriage?
Yes, marriage is about love. Still, as such, love is a necessary but not sufficient justification for marriage remaining and being about the union of ONE man and ONE woman. How about children? Yes, I already know that not every heterosexual can or does have children.
No, you fundamentally misunderstand that a "redefinition" is only necessary in regards to your definition. Not the legal definition. what opponents of homosexual marriage fail to realize is that when an amendment to the Constitution is necessary in order to ban gay marriage, the only redefinition being requested is that of those attempting the Amendment. The rest of us are clearly using a completely different definition and have been for some time.
that is the whole point. all he wants is to marry the love of his life. but in order to do that, he has to seek approval from everyone around him. that is the same issue gay men and women are being put through now - with Prop 8, they can't stay married even.
marriage shouldn't be permitted, sanctioned, outlawed, taxed, legalized, or otherwise controlled by government. marriage is a private affair between two people.
married people should have no different rights than those of the individuals invloved. i don't have to accept or approve of your marriage and you don't have to accept or approve of mine.
its time to get the government out of marriage, out of bedrooms, out of churches, out of our private lives.
Very, very cool. Now if they'd make a PSA about how to be responsible and caring spouses, that would be even better given the current divorce rate and children of divorce stand a higher chance of divorce in their own marriage.
Some countries need to graduate the stone-age. Really, is the concept of human equality so alien? Archaic America might as well be referred to as The Fourth Reich.
harvester76: (Pt.2) I responded to each of your posts replying to my first comment, but have a couple of things to add. Your posts are EVIDENCE that you are whining continually. If you do wish to marry a woman, you have all the legal rights & protections of marriage & have millions of women to choose from, & yet that is not enough for you. You want to make sure that no one gets the exact same rights you have! Seems pretty selfish. Ungrateful too.
harvester76: Whether it's projecting or hypocrisy or both, right-wingers are quick to accuse liberals of name-calling at the very moment they are name-calling themselves! YOU call people "deviant" & say that gay people are not normal people.
Gay World? How does fighting for the right to get married lead to world domination? You're confusing the gays with another group of people. Do you think we get together on Sunday afternoons, put on a Madonna remix cd, and discuss forcing our beliefs upon the masses and the formation of new laws to do so? Forcing beliefs upon a people and forming new laws to keep it that way is the job of someone. Hint: it's not the gays. We want a thing called equal rights.
The government should get out of the "marriage" business altogether -- marriage is a religious function. The government should only issue "civil union" licenses, and those wanting marriage should take thier license to their favorite church or AA Chapter and do their own nuptuals away from government interference.
i sort of agree with you. It's not so much religious anymore, either. I don't feel like we need written permission from the government to love someone, either.
It's a fact that homophobes are latent homosexuals who feel frustration, fear and guilt over these feelings, so they lash out in anger at other gays. They are guided and consumed by fear, and they live their pathetic little lives as bullying-cowards. Hey, it's a fact.
Clearly you've gotten them in a serious twist based on some kind of bizarre paranoia about gays taking over the world. I'm not sure how the right to married marry = world domination exactly, but I'm sure it makes sense in your irrational, xenophobic world.
Um, that's the whole point-- we have to keep asking because equal treatment under the law for our families is being denied to us. We will gladly stop asking once we get our equal rights, got it?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Equal treatment? Ever try to be white and get a job a black has applied for? Plus I'm male and can't give birth. Should the government be responsible for that? But you have a choice whether to desire the opposite sex, or your own. If you choose your own, the there are consequences. Either live with it or don't make that choice.
Since according to you we choose to whom we are attracted, when did you decide to stop desiring men & to be attracted to women? Or have you made that choice yet? The government IS responsible for legal, civil marriage & the benefits that go with it. They aren't responsible for you being born male. If the government is going to punish mutually consenting adults for who they love or how they love, how about they ban marriage for Kristian bigots & selfish, whiny, straight guys?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Ah, that's it. Lets leave logic behind and get emotional. Of course I guess I'm whiny and a bigot. Interesting that you don't know me well enough to say I'm a Christian (your spelling was wrong), a bigot, selfish, or whiny. You don't even know if I'm straight. Why is it that liberals always start name calling when they can't think logically? Did it make you feel better? Maybe you should call me the "N Word", too.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Also, the government has taken the authority for marriage away from the church. WHy don't you just form a business partnership? Then you can get the legal connections you desire and also get the perks of a business! Why do you need to meddle with the things of normal people? Be attracted to whom ever you choose, just leave us alone and don't expect us to encoursge it or even like it of your are deviant.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Should I be allowed to marry two women? Should I be allowed to marry my mother or sister? Should I be allowed to marry a 10 year old? Should I be allowed to marry my Irish Setter? See? There really are moral standards that exist! If you want to do what's right in your own eyes, move to France. Please leave us alone.
"Please leave us alone." That sounds pretty whiny to me, considering there are TENS OF MILLIONS of women that you can legally marry, and yet you want to punish your fellow Americans by preventing them from marrying ANYONE. You feel threatened unless EVERYONE in this country is just like you.
Since when do any of those scenarios have anything to do with the situation at hand? You're changing the subject and trying to be clever, but you're really only coming off as whiny.
foolishness. Utter foolishness. People did that, do that and still you demonize gay marriage. Unbe-fucking-lievable. Marrying two women is illegal, or at least frowned upon greatly. You must be a certain age to get married. Marriage is consentual, so the dog might have trouble saying, "I do."
There you go again, comparing a loving consenual relationship to child abuse, animal cruelty, etc. I've heard it all. Some people have gone so far as to compare it to slavery, drug abuse, and mass murder. Next you're going to say LGBT people are going to take over the world with hypno-rays or some science fiction nonsense, right?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
This statement is an irrelevant "argument". There is already laws that say you cannot marry 2 women or your mother or sister or a minor in America let alone your animal. It sounds to me you have a couple of Fetish issues hummm??? BUT there ARE laws that say you CAN get married to a SINGLE ADULT HUMAN BEING IN AMERICA.
A wonderful video making a lovely, very clear point. (Though the music surprised me - Cat Power's "I Don't Blame You". Gorgeous song, didn't expect to hear that.)
This hones in on the utter insanity of our government to place moral and religious arguments on the people of this nation. We can't continue to justify making admendments that will limit the freedoms of the citizens of the United States of America by using a religious book. This is not a theocracy, this is a nation of laws FOR THE PEOPLE as well as by the people. It's a wonderfully understated film that makes a very profound statement.
it does. its a great ad. it shows how ridiculous it is to have other people decide who your allowed to marry, whether they're the same sex as you or not.
I dont get it
mrbuzzybee1 6 months ago
Have you ever heard of a gay couple that hurt the children they had? I don't. And I know why: because it's much harder to have a baby for gay than for "straight" couples, because while heterosexuals can have "accidents", homosexuals have to go a long way to be able to have a child. You don't hurt somebody you did so much for.
What I'm saying is: Homosexuals spend a lot more time thinking about whether they want a child or not, and that makes them better parents in many cases.
Lolagoestohollywood 2 years ago 11
There is an irish version which is also quite similar called ´Sinead´s hand´. I have no idea which one came first, but they are both great!
duinedubh 2 years ago 2
Mugge21xx --
Other way around.
Sinead's Hand was inspired by this one--it even states that in the credits.
MsEstellaM 2 years ago
It was actually copied from Marriage equality Ireland Video Sinead's Hand/
muggle21xx 2 years ago
Hey frannol, you want to hear about a "broken family"? Talk to my husband. His dear sweet DADDY beat him mercilessly when he was a child! On a daily basis! When his mother tried to leave, DADDY threatened to find and kill his own sons just to spite her! And this was one of those "traditional" marriages that the neo-cons love to trumpet.
Don't you dare say that a Mommy and a Daddy make a perfect family. They do not. Let the gays marry. They might do a better job than the straights have.
RunsWithWeasels 2 years ago 26
I agree, these "straights" keep producing us gays!
SO technically people who have a problem with homosexuality should have a problem with heterosexuality as well...it's not like we're popping out all these gay children! :]
ChezNight 2 years ago 8
Awesome video. Does anyone know who made the music for this video..? I love it!
rattymama 2 years ago 4
"I Don't Blame You" by Cat Power
Ender605 2 years ago
This is wonderful. I'm happy it's already been awarded, and hopefully many more awards will be on the way.
Anyone south of the Mason-Dixon line should ask their grandparents (or great-grandparents) to be candid about the race marriage laws of the 40s and 50s. The bible was used a lot to show that God didn't want people of different races to marry each other. I know this because my grandparents were brave enough to talk about it and admit to me that they were wrong.
puliqueen 2 years ago 10
Fair play to your grandparents! Your analogy is excellant. Just as the laws affecting the civil rights of people in South Africa and Northenr Ireland were wrong, so are these. Yet bigots continue to justify them!
In 20, 30 or 40 years time, will u have to admit to your childrent hat were the new form of the KKK at one point in your life!
duinedubh 2 years ago
Fuck bigotry.
AJ78910 2 years ago 5
Most conservatives define "unnatural" as anything that can not lead to procreation. So, they claim, if a sexual act does not lead to procreation it is wrong. However, many of them would have absolutely nothing to say about a woman having sex with a man after menopause... which can not lead to procreation.
bisnizhokie 2 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Children also have the right to have a mommy and a dad, this is unnatural, the end of a healthy society
frannol 2 years ago
A right to a mommy and dad - In which legal document did you read this?
Unnatural - How are you qualifying this?
How are you measuring the health of a society?
malkyrock 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The Bible!
frannol 2 years ago
Do you also get guidance from Harry Potter?
malkyrock 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I don't expect you to understand.. I hope you are well and in peace with your decision. I believe in God and his words and also believe that family is the base of a happy and healthy society, children have the right to be born, have caring and loving parents. Marriage should be between a man and a women. We already know the statistics of kids with broken families.. I
frannol 2 years ago
You are retarded. Children obviously require a parent of both sexes to be conceived, but you do realize that there are many children that are raised with single parents. Also homosexuality occurs naturally in nature. Saying they have a right to a mother and father means they have a choice, you would not be giving them a choice if you only allow them to have a mother and father. You should probably shut the fuck up.
Laturales 2 years ago 3
Please make it captioned for millions of Deaf/HH people. More Accessible more power to you. Check for free Internet subtitle website. thanks!
LSmae 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I saw her already many times she got a full thread with videos on 4 a slut info
holebitterly44 2 years ago
HUH???? That sentence make zero sense, lol!!
lordydordy 2 years ago
well done.
twentyfirstcentury21 2 years ago
This is BEAUTIFUL, but I do believe that I have seen an extermely similar video from Ireland.
GhostTaps 2 years ago
Yes, it is quite possibe you've seen cover version of it made by Marriage Equality just recently - they run the campaign for same-sex marriage in Ireland (the vid is called 'Sinead's Hand (in marriage)' ) It's shot-for-shot, nicely done, with great music by Lisa Hannigan. Both videos are good as they are for a good cause! :)
kaag09 2 years ago
This is fucking amazing. I hope it actually gets people to understand.
alifeinthelens 2 years ago 8
I belive "rights" should be called rights if they are literally rights not something given to people only if they meet certain outrageous qualifications. Which is more like a priveledge since rights shouldnt be able to be taken away for mild things like sexuality.
necisfalx 2 years ago 2
EXCELLENT
NewarkGuy 2 years ago 3
this needs to be brought to America's television stations.
efrisina 2 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
I'm just happy with the fact gay sex offends so many people. . . that for me is reward enough. Have you ever seen a true homophobe squirm? . . . fucking priceless. Stop trying to be like the gaping maw and start burning churches down. jeeeze! Married?! Why?! Who gives a cunt?!
JustinNyland 2 years ago
this is a pretty powerful message. i hope people can watch it and kinda figure out how we see things.
C4eaglem 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
has anyone said it was christian bashing or infringing on their religious rights yet?
ricmarc 2 years ago
Dibs on Megan's other body parts.
Erudecorp 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
How many people would you have to ask to give special treatment to special people?
How many people would you have to ask to add rights to the list of protected rights?
How many people would you have to ask to treat groups of people preferentially?
How many people would you have to ask to change the meaning of words?
How many people would you have to ask to change the structure of society?
How many people would you have to ask to change the amount of nonsense you hear every day?
ilmotore 2 years ago
You think gay and lesbian marriage is preferential treatment?
They have the same rights as straight couples, they aren't adding any rights, they are simply making them recognized by law.
jpopkamaria 2 years ago 14
Were diffrent because we want rights you have as a straight person? Granted, there are times when gay people ARE seprate, but, things like marriage and being able to adopt, are rights you have, that we don't because of whom we love. Its no one's business who wants tp get married but those who are creating the union.
zrtproductions 2 years ago 7
Pretty powerful.
LoveToday8 2 years ago 6
this should be on television.
some positive media brainwashing could do this society some good.
TenCrownsDrop12 2 years ago 7
I think the word you were looking for there mate was probably perspective. - Mossa Nova.
CGMossa 2 years ago
The song is "I don't blame you" by Cat Power
Noazdove 2 years ago
love it. Who sings that song?
Tflinnful 2 years ago
Very therapeutic to watch today after the the hypocrisy witnessed yesterday in California. Let's hope we see this on TV when the next campaign is in full swing.
badpappy 2 years ago 2
Do you know what song this is?
squishybird 2 years ago
fantastic video
two thumbs up
i only wish more people would see this
PandaRie 2 years ago 3
great video!
gmd717 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i will do all to ur pleasure
fastloverfun(dot)(com)
LeslieRussellxxx86 2 years ago
Love it!
scentlessapprentice4 2 years ago
If any of you haters on here can give me one NON RELIGIOUS REASON why gay marriage should not be allowed, please do it. We have a seperation of church and state in this country and I would liek for you to keep your RELIGIOUS VIEW out of my STATE rights. Thank you.
Androjai 2 years ago 32
This is wonderful, thank you for sharing.
SK84D3ATH 3 years ago
I love this video. Made me feel good to know people fight.
Lolagoestohollywood 3 years ago 3
california family code 297.5
(a) Registered domestic partners shall have the same rights,
protections, and benefits, and shall be subject to the same
responsibilities, obligations, and duties under law, whether they
derive from statutes, administrative regulations, court rules,
government policies, common law, or any other provisions or sources
of law, as are granted to and imposed upon spouses.
xdeep0 3 years ago
So what's the problem with them being "spouses" instead of "domestic partners"?
TiryaC 3 years ago
This is amazing...
dancindandelion 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
you ask the court when you want a civil union. you ask God when you get married. the courts may say yes, but God says NO!
Yes on 8. protect marriage.
xdeep0 3 years ago
Who are you to say what God thinks?
dancindandelion 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
some things are very plain and clear:
"You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination." -Leviticus 18:22
xdeep0 3 years ago
legalized homosexual marriage would not mean a church has to marry homosexuals. it means the state would be required to give them the same status that heterosexual couples get (including being able to say they are married). as there is a separation of church and state, the state cannot force churches to comply and churches should not influence the state's decision in this matter.
dannyj5656 3 years ago 4
Way before the bible was written, a man named Plato wrote "[homosexuality] is regarded as shameful by barbarians and by those who live under despotic governments just as philosophy is regarded as shameful by them, because it is apparently not in the interest of such rulers to have great ideas engendered in their subjects, or powerful friendships or passionate love-all of which homosexuality is particularly apt to produce."
dancindandelion 3 years ago
So you just stop with that verse in Leviticus? Hypocrite. Read the rest of it...
gburgan 3 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
are you trying to insinuate it's out of context? the rest of Leviticus just talks about things you shouldn't do and that it's an abomination. unless you can prove otherwise, here it is, nice try! 23'(T)Also you shall not have intercourse with any animal to be defiled with it, nor shall any woman stand before an animal to mate with it; it is a perversion. 24'Do not defile yourselves by any of these things; for by all these (U)the nations which I am casting out before you have become defiled.
xdeep0 3 years ago
No, hypocrite... I'm not trying to insinuate anything other than ignorant people like yourself don't practice what you preach. Your flesh will burn as much as mine in hell. Is that clear enough for you? Dumbass.
gburgan 3 years ago 2
By the way, you can spend the rest of your natural born days quoting scriptures... it makes no difference to me. You Christian fundamentalist are hypocrites and there is NO DIFFERENCE in you and fundamentalist MUSLIMS. Trying to force YOUR beliefs on the rest of the planet isn't going to work.
gburgan 3 years ago 6
well said
sidahboo 3 years ago
If we're listing Leviticus, you may want to re-read Lev 20:10 and Lev 4:22 - Why is Jim Bakker still alive, and did Ted Haggard properly sacrifice his goat?
TiryaC 3 years ago 3
The song playing is so pretty...what is it?
zombielover1981 3 years ago
Wow, this made me cry.
If I were in Cali, I would vote no.
MrsSarahReed 3 years ago
I honestly don't think its our business if two people love each other if they are homosexual. It seems like a problem for them...as far as kids knowing about it, I want to know how many 12 year olds don't know about gay people already. There is gay culture everywhere, kids aren't safe anyways once they become teens, if you make it less controversial the naive will not be attracted to ideology solely based on the fact that "my mom and dad said its bad so it mustn't be". Good piece of video
st1tcount 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This video fundamentally misunderstands that marriage is a public, as well as a private institution and as such is regulated by the State for such purposes. To attempt to so radically redefine marriage as same-sex "marriage" advocates are now attempting to do, and then claim that it is unfair when those defending natural marriage say "NO" shows a lack of understanding about the public purpose of marriage.
Marriage is available to every gay man and lesbian woman on the terms it has been offered.
oryssman 3 years ago
I don't think it's the video that misunderstands anything. I think it's you that misunderstands marriage.
PandemicSoul 3 years ago 9
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Rather than leaving what amounts to little more than a bumper sticker cliche, why don't you explain what it is that I "misunderstand" about marriage?
Yes, marriage is about love. Still, as such, love is a necessary but not sufficient justification for marriage remaining and being about the union of ONE man and ONE woman. How about children? Yes, I already know that not every heterosexual can or does have children.
oryssman 3 years ago
No, you fundamentally misunderstand that a "redefinition" is only necessary in regards to your definition. Not the legal definition. what opponents of homosexual marriage fail to realize is that when an amendment to the Constitution is necessary in order to ban gay marriage, the only redefinition being requested is that of those attempting the Amendment. The rest of us are clearly using a completely different definition and have been for some time.
captainhucklebuck 3 years ago 7
very powerful piece... thank you for highlighting the inherent unfairness of these anti-gay measures!
designck 3 years ago 2
NO ON PROPOSITION 8!
TheInfamousBertman 3 years ago 9
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I don't get it, he already had permission to marry Megan, now if he would have asked if he could marry George, well then I would have said no.
mppolito 3 years ago
that is the whole point. all he wants is to marry the love of his life. but in order to do that, he has to seek approval from everyone around him. that is the same issue gay men and women are being put through now - with Prop 8, they can't stay married even.
frenneken 3 years ago 4
Why would you have said no?
paznut7 3 years ago 4
Excelente!!!.
alvita111 3 years ago
Thank you.
jazzdebra 3 years ago 2
OK you got me crying now! Great piece- thank you.
auntazalia 3 years ago
Such a strong piece. I love it.
SaylaMarz 3 years ago
Very powerful stuff, totally worthy of its award. It made me tear up a bit, actually...
BlacknPinkGloves 3 years ago
That is a good one! My husband and I are both voting NO on Prop 8 here in CA!
mirandarulz 3 years ago
Great ad, and props for the excellent music as well ("I Don't Blame You" by Cat Power)
webmacher 3 years ago 3
This is wonderful and so poignant. If only we saw this on TV as often as all the political ads lately.
jordan1971 3 years ago 3
Powerful. Unexpected ending.
BeachSaint 3 years ago
Beautiful. Even though I will gladly vote NO on 8 in California, fundamental rights should not be up to a vote.
monitajb 3 years ago
more gay marriage ad on my homepage!!!!!!
9in10dotorg 3 years ago
Great commercial. Really gets the point across!!
Charlalee 3 years ago
marriage shouldn't be permitted, sanctioned, outlawed, taxed, legalized, or otherwise controlled by government. marriage is a private affair between two people.
married people should have no different rights than those of the individuals invloved. i don't have to accept or approve of your marriage and you don't have to accept or approve of mine.
its time to get the government out of marriage, out of bedrooms, out of churches, out of our private lives.
oq242 3 years ago 10
while I agree with you, there is a need for legal recognotion of the union for medical and property rights issues
fairlycrazy 2 years ago 3
omg, that is so sad...
This is such a great point..I mean, why cant you just marry whoever you want?
hehe21029 3 years ago 2
at first i didnt get itt
but then i was lk holy shit
this is fucking great
:]
ooalison 4 years ago
Very nice.
greenpoint101 4 years ago
this is amazing
Emmxah 4 years ago
GREAT video, very well done, and very poignant. Thanks for sharing this!
Spirituse6 4 years ago 2
Very,very,very cool.
BabyPaneHudson 4 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
<b>
Enter [_XXXodour.com_] to Play Full Length XXX Videos 4 FREE
</b>
buklerat 4 years ago
Very, very cool. Now if they'd make a PSA about how to be responsible and caring spouses, that would be even better given the current divorce rate and children of divorce stand a higher chance of divorce in their own marriage.
texanhoustonguy 4 years ago 2
This was absolutely amazing. Thank you for sharing this video.
rommie1201 4 years ago
Beautiful!
anemicmosquito 4 years ago
what a great video.
alifetimeatsingsing 4 years ago
This video is so true. lol
Lets go past society's "ethics" and "morals" for a minute and consider the right to pursue happiness.
I mean, it'snot like gay marriage would violate Brittaney Spear's 52-hour-just-for-fun marriage right?
Our orphanages need more children right?
And gay couple will only produce gay children just like straight couples only produce straight children am I right?
zooboy1990 4 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Oh my God. What an IDIOT!!
redfox0015 4 years ago
By the way...for those of you that didn't get it....that was sarcasm.
zooboy1990 4 years ago
wow, this is awesome!
billionbucks 4 years ago
great vid, thanks!
2kes 5 years ago
This was a beautiful, beautiful video. Thank you.
thatfirstkiss 5 years ago
Some countries need to graduate the stone-age. Really, is the concept of human equality so alien? Archaic America might as well be referred to as The Fourth Reich.
iamcaelum 5 years ago
Remarkable product. I really like it.
awwpeaches 5 years ago
harvester76: (Pt.2) I responded to each of your posts replying to my first comment, but have a couple of things to add. Your posts are EVIDENCE that you are whining continually. If you do wish to marry a woman, you have all the legal rights & protections of marriage & have millions of women to choose from, & yet that is not enough for you. You want to make sure that no one gets the exact same rights you have! Seems pretty selfish. Ungrateful too.
KatchooFrancine 5 years ago 5
harvester76: Whether it's projecting or hypocrisy or both, right-wingers are quick to accuse liberals of name-calling at the very moment they are name-calling themselves! YOU call people "deviant" & say that gay people are not normal people.
KatchooFrancine 5 years ago
i thought it really was awsomely done
and great song too
jillflash1289 5 years ago
That was very good!
kyoyukidegus 5 years ago
bravo!
blackdogstrut 5 years ago
That's a very great video.
evolveordissolve 5 years ago
touching.
queerion 5 years ago
nice ting
shadeeg 5 years ago
awesome
paigewilliams 5 years ago
Gay World? How does fighting for the right to get married lead to world domination? You're confusing the gays with another group of people. Do you think we get together on Sunday afternoons, put on a Madonna remix cd, and discuss forcing our beliefs upon the masses and the formation of new laws to do so? Forcing beliefs upon a people and forming new laws to keep it that way is the job of someone. Hint: it's not the gays. We want a thing called equal rights.
chakrasyoga 5 years ago 3
Lmao @ the Madonna remix CD.
I like the video. I can only hope equal rights will be a part of our future.
kanmi 5 years ago
That makes no sense whatsoever. I am from planet earth, what planet are you from?
heddache 5 years ago
tired....
treesapp 5 years ago
I personally think it's a BRILLIANT video. It makes it's point and I think it was a very good idea.
SukiChan 5 years ago
The government should get out of the "marriage" business altogether -- marriage is a religious function. The government should only issue "civil union" licenses, and those wanting marriage should take thier license to their favorite church or AA Chapter and do their own nuptuals away from government interference.
gts1014 5 years ago
i sort of agree with you. It's not so much religious anymore, either. I don't feel like we need written permission from the government to love someone, either.
XmaLLeeX 5 years ago
not so much permition, but a legal reconigition of a legal contract between 2 people
fairlycrazy 2 years ago
Tony's Gay World = In His Own Mind.
It's a fact that homophobes are latent homosexuals who feel frustration, fear and guilt over these feelings, so they lash out in anger at other gays. They are guided and consumed by fear, and they live their pathetic little lives as bullying-cowards. Hey, it's a fact.
gts1014 5 years ago
What a great strategy - whoever says nothing is on your side and whoever says anything against you - is actually you.
TonySQNS 5 years ago
I'll bet you are (rolling balls)
TonySQNS 5 years ago
Clearly you've gotten them in a serious twist based on some kind of bizarre paranoia about gays taking over the world. I'm not sure how the right to married marry = world domination exactly, but I'm sure it makes sense in your irrational, xenophobic world.
heddache 5 years ago
After we give you the right to saem sex marriage soon you'll be asking for the right to marry the opposite gender as well - yechhh!!
TonySQNS 5 years ago
I'm personally hoping that we can eventually make heterosexuality a criminal offense punishable by death. (rolling eyes)
heddache 5 years ago
No, we won't stop until we've destroyed marriage everywhere, for everyone, until we've made having a family illegal...whuh-ha-ha.
It's all part of the evil Homosexual Agenda-- to destroy your marriage by getting married. Makes sense, doesn't it?
Oh, wait, it doesn't?
heddache 5 years ago
Yes it does make sense.
The Homosexual Agenda = Gay World.
TonySQNS 5 years ago
Totally. Except for the straight majority...
yuyukachoo 5 years ago
If you dont want to ask for the right - how come you're asking non-stop??
TonySQNS 5 years ago
Um, that's the whole point-- we have to keep asking because equal treatment under the law for our families is being denied to us. We will gladly stop asking once we get our equal rights, got it?
heddache 5 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Oh yeah you'll stop there huh?
TonySQNS 5 years ago
What does that even mean?
pureproduct 5 years ago
The "Oh yeah you'll stop there huh?" that is.
pureproduct 5 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Equal treatment? Ever try to be white and get a job a black has applied for? Plus I'm male and can't give birth. Should the government be responsible for that? But you have a choice whether to desire the opposite sex, or your own. If you choose your own, the there are consequences. Either live with it or don't make that choice.
harvester76 5 years ago
Since according to you we choose to whom we are attracted, when did you decide to stop desiring men & to be attracted to women? Or have you made that choice yet? The government IS responsible for legal, civil marriage & the benefits that go with it. They aren't responsible for you being born male. If the government is going to punish mutually consenting adults for who they love or how they love, how about they ban marriage for Kristian bigots & selfish, whiny, straight guys?
KatchooFrancine 5 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ah, that's it. Lets leave logic behind and get emotional. Of course I guess I'm whiny and a bigot. Interesting that you don't know me well enough to say I'm a Christian (your spelling was wrong), a bigot, selfish, or whiny. You don't even know if I'm straight. Why is it that liberals always start name calling when they can't think logically? Did it make you feel better? Maybe you should call me the "N Word", too.
harvester76 5 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Also, the government has taken the authority for marriage away from the church. WHy don't you just form a business partnership? Then you can get the legal connections you desire and also get the perks of a business! Why do you need to meddle with the things of normal people? Be attracted to whom ever you choose, just leave us alone and don't expect us to encoursge it or even like it of your are deviant.
harvester76 5 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Should I be allowed to marry two women? Should I be allowed to marry my mother or sister? Should I be allowed to marry a 10 year old? Should I be allowed to marry my Irish Setter? See? There really are moral standards that exist! If you want to do what's right in your own eyes, move to France. Please leave us alone.
harvester76 5 years ago
"Please leave us alone." That sounds pretty whiny to me, considering there are TENS OF MILLIONS of women that you can legally marry, and yet you want to punish your fellow Americans by preventing them from marrying ANYONE. You feel threatened unless EVERYONE in this country is just like you.
KatchooFrancine 5 years ago 7
Since when do any of those scenarios have anything to do with the situation at hand? You're changing the subject and trying to be clever, but you're really only coming off as whiny.
gottrimmtrabb 5 years ago
foolishness. Utter foolishness. People did that, do that and still you demonize gay marriage. Unbe-fucking-lievable. Marrying two women is illegal, or at least frowned upon greatly. You must be a certain age to get married. Marriage is consentual, so the dog might have trouble saying, "I do."
ponyboy316 5 years ago
Well, now we know you enough to know you are straight. and perhaps a bigot.
AHKyle 5 years ago
There you go again, comparing a loving consenual relationship to child abuse, animal cruelty, etc. I've heard it all. Some people have gone so far as to compare it to slavery, drug abuse, and mass murder. Next you're going to say LGBT people are going to take over the world with hypno-rays or some science fiction nonsense, right?
mordredt02 4 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This statement is an irrelevant "argument". There is already laws that say you cannot marry 2 women or your mother or sister or a minor in America let alone your animal. It sounds to me you have a couple of Fetish issues hummm??? BUT there ARE laws that say you CAN get married to a SINGLE ADULT HUMAN BEING IN AMERICA.
starcase73 4 years ago
Great video.
dablinksousa 5 years ago
A wonderful video making a lovely, very clear point. (Though the music surprised me - Cat Power's "I Don't Blame You". Gorgeous song, didn't expect to hear that.)
ekoa 5 years ago
Makes me sad that this is what we have come to today. Great statement, but will it open peoples eyes?
CJ2112 5 years ago
AWESOME!!! Thank you!!!
GreenEyedLilo 5 years ago
I posted this video on myspace.com
bishopflight 5 years ago
I loved it. People should send a link to this video to everyone they know.
vejzagic 5 years ago
This hones in on the utter insanity of our government to place moral and religious arguments on the people of this nation. We can't continue to justify making admendments that will limit the freedoms of the citizens of the United States of America by using a religious book. This is not a theocracy, this is a nation of laws FOR THE PEOPLE as well as by the people. It's a wonderfully understated film that makes a very profound statement.
mortimerlove 5 years ago 3
great!
badbutt570 5 years ago
I love it! Thank you for sharing this.
playstoorough 5 years ago
it does. its a great ad. it shows how ridiculous it is to have other people decide who your allowed to marry, whether they're the same sex as you or not.
zippyqueen 5 years ago
I think the ad makes a great point.
electrogeek77 5 years ago