Now that Kevnin Barrett has convinced 100 million Americans of what he knows about the 9/11 bombing (that it was obviously an inside job), he says he is now ready to take on those who actually believe that six million Jews were killed by the Nazis in the death camps across europe. Studying pictures of the ovens Barrett attests that he has identified traces of thermite, and insists that zyklon-b could never have done the dasterdly job. He says it was controlled demolition and not Zyklon-b.
Most architects and engineers in the world have never even heard of WTC building 7. RKO, I challenge you to provide a list of independent architects and engineers who have expressed confidence in the NIST report.
Repeat: independent. Nobody whose firm worked on the NIST report or the FEMA report allowed. I have yet to find a single member of "Architects and Engineers Supporting the NIST Report" who are not larded with conflicts of interest.
WOW!!!!!!! You mean 1,000 architects and engineers worldwide support 9/11 truth???? That's amazing! But wait, how many architects and engineers are there in the world which that number is out of? Well, according to the U.S. Department of Labor there are 1,700,000 employed architects and engineers in the U.S. So, worldwide the number is at least 10 times that. So, that's 1,000 out of 17,000,000 experts. Or, 1 in 17,000 experts who supports 9/11 truth.
No, he means 1,000 architects and engineers have signed his petition(they have to be physically in front of the paper) for his SPECIFIC group. Do you think he's gone and visited all 1.7 million engineers and architects in this country? Not everyone wants to be branded a wing-nut for stating the obvious: CONTROLLED DEMOLITION. It's also funny how some of your videos have come to convince people of the fact that attacks were controlled demolition.
In a comment titled, "9/11 Truth Crazies Return to SF", Jay Barmann says, "We won't dismiss it all out of hand . . . but we're personally of a mind that two jet planes with full tanks of fuel, aimed just right, could in fact cause a structural collapse like the one that happened that fateful day." Does Barmann not even know that the fires at the towers burned neither hot enough nor long enough to cause the steel to weaken? They could have burned forever and not damaged the steel. It is unreal.
For more about Dr. Barrett and a discussion of his scholarship and academic purging, see my video "Kevin Barrett Go to Your Room"
punxsutawneybarney 1 year ago
Now that Kevnin Barrett has convinced 100 million Americans of what he knows about the 9/11 bombing (that it was obviously an inside job), he says he is now ready to take on those who actually believe that six million Jews were killed by the Nazis in the death camps across europe. Studying pictures of the ovens Barrett attests that he has identified traces of thermite, and insists that zyklon-b could never have done the dasterdly job. He says it was controlled demolition and not Zyklon-b.
bman342 1 year ago
Underwriters labs never certified any steel.... lie one.
Kevin (a water tester) was fired for making fraudulent claims... proven facts.
TWOOFERS ARE SUCH LYING SCUM BAGS
greywolf424 1 year ago
gw, UW certified the steel assemblies and you are a lying scumbag.
punxsutawneybarney 1 year ago
THEY CERTIFY FLOORING SYSTEMS, not steel, MORON.
greywolf424 1 year ago
Steel floor assemblies.
punxsutawneybarney 1 year ago
WHICH IS NOT THE STEEL ITSELF like Kevin (waterboy) claimed
greywolf424 1 year ago
Certifying steel floor assemblies for performance in fires involves certifying the performance of the steel. Do you have a point?
punxsutawneybarney 1 year ago
Waterboy is a loser and a liar
greywolf424 1 year ago
And you're not?
punxsutawneybarney 1 year ago
URL Does not CERTIFY STEEL.
greywolf424 1 year ago
URL, what's that? Bwa ha! You are one silly tool.
punxsutawneybarney 1 year ago
Ohhhhh you found a typo, you must be sooooooo proud.
greywolf424 1 year ago
No, I found an idiot and it's nothing to be proud about. The world is full of them.
punxsutawneybarney 1 year ago
And they all joined the twoof movement.
greywolf424 1 year ago
@punxsutawneybarney
have you been to see a psychiatrist yet, Petgoat? Stalking people is bad, you know.
ianat841 1 year ago
A cell in a FEMA Camp has already your name on it, KEVIN!
LOLonthetruth 2 years ago
Most architects and engineers in the world have never even heard of WTC building 7. RKO, I challenge you to provide a list of independent architects and engineers who have expressed confidence in the NIST report.
Repeat: independent. Nobody whose firm worked on the NIST report or the FEMA report allowed. I have yet to find a single member of "Architects and Engineers Supporting the NIST Report" who are not larded with conflicts of interest.
punxsutawneybarney 2 years ago 2
"Most architects and engineers in the world have never even heard of WTC building 7. "
PURE BULLSHIT
greywolf424 1 year ago
WOW!!!!!!! You mean 1,000 architects and engineers worldwide support 9/11 truth???? That's amazing! But wait, how many architects and engineers are there in the world which that number is out of? Well, according to the U.S. Department of Labor there are 1,700,000 employed architects and engineers in the U.S. So, worldwide the number is at least 10 times that. So, that's 1,000 out of 17,000,000 experts. Or, 1 in 17,000 experts who supports 9/11 truth.
Dope!
RKOwens4 2 years ago
No, he means 1,000 architects and engineers have signed his petition(they have to be physically in front of the paper) for his SPECIFIC group. Do you think he's gone and visited all 1.7 million engineers and architects in this country? Not everyone wants to be branded a wing-nut for stating the obvious: CONTROLLED DEMOLITION. It's also funny how some of your videos have come to convince people of the fact that attacks were controlled demolition.
MultiBlinkey 2 years ago
Fear not the path of truth for the lack of people walking on it!
Cornbag 2 years ago
RK Owens -- so I guess you can't find a single independent architect or engineer who will express confidence in the NIST report.
Well that's consistent with my findings when I've challenged other blowhard debunkers to name some.
punxsutawneybarney 1 year ago
Yes more than arson, premeditated mass murder.
pieater53 2 years ago
In a comment titled, "9/11 Truth Crazies Return to SF", Jay Barmann says, "We won't dismiss it all out of hand . . . but we're personally of a mind that two jet planes with full tanks of fuel, aimed just right, could in fact cause a structural collapse like the one that happened that fateful day." Does Barmann not even know that the fires at the towers burned neither hot enough nor long enough to cause the steel to weaken? They could have burned forever and not damaged the steel. It is unreal.
LolaHeavey 2 years ago
faved.
TheSandLine 2 years ago