Putting in a guy like "Joe Kennedy" was very sly. This "trick" on voters has been used before. The idea is that voters who do not know better will vote for a "Kennedy" with great ideas. This would in turn, take away votes from the Republican and ensure a Democratic win.
I saw the debate with Brown, Coakley and Kennedy and I was impressed with Kennedy. He's not glamorous but I like his standpoint: cut taxes, cut spending, close down the borders, get out of wars to keep us safe and rely on internal security. Sounds good to me. Hope Brown remembers some of what Kennedy said. He's probably the only Kennedy in Massachusetts who LOST votes because of his name.
romney care= obama care. same thing. what do you idiotic party line scott brown supporters not realize about that? scott brown and martha coakley are the same candidate. both are socialists.
God Bless You Joe Kennedy!!! After hearing about the death threats coming from the Brown campaign towards your family Mr. Kennedy... I will gladly donate money towards your campaign...
Ok, so your quick to shoot down the other two candidates but please explain how Joe Kennedy plans on fixing the problem? Because all I hear is him reiterating the problem...Just my thought
Joe Kennedy for Senate! Thank you, Joe, for taking a stand and not backing down. We will NOT support a socialist or a neocon! YOU deserve our vote... not Brown or Coakley.
Don't waste your vote - Martha Coakley is depending on people splitting their votes between Kennedy and Scott Brown - basically what it comes down to is: if you vote for Kennedy you're voting for Coakley.
I wrote a letter to the boston globe endorsing Brown. If he can help stop this insanity it is worth it. I think Joe Kennedy is the better man, but he has no chance of winning. Any vote for him will
assure a Coakely win. Who knows mayby the Coakley people put kennedy up to this.
The dems did that in the Jersey 2009 governors election. They paid the independent to take away votes from the republicans, and still lost. Liberals are pigs.
yes it is, and sadly that is not an issue for washington and much of the country. shamefully the vast majority of the federal gov activities and spending is unconstitutional. america deserves the currency and economic collapse that is at our doorstep. our ignorance and arrogant foolishness is almost unbelievable. its the american peoples fault at this point, we can no longer blame politicians. we vote for them
He has my vote. I almost he was running forgot because independents don't get crap for air time against the big business Dems and Repubs but win or not I will let my voice be heard.I know he is not as personable as say Martha or Scott ,but Honesty over face value any day.
Brown says he doesn't support the federal bill, but he DOES support the MA version of socialized medicine that fines businesses if they don't provide healthcare. He also says he supports exporting that system to every other state. As a US Senator, he or Coakley would have the ability to do that.
Brown doesn't oppose socialized medicine on principle, he just opposes the Obama plan on a few technical details. He stated in the debate that he wishes to export the MA system to other states.
Brown supported Romneycare, and advocates exporting the MA version of socialized medicine to all 50 states. He has publicly called himself a pragmatist (ie: no philosophy but "range of the moment"). As a US Senator he would be in a position to "compromise" and vote away the freedoms of everyone in the US, not just the people of MA, as he did while he was in office as a state legislator.
The term RINO (Republican In Name Only) is very appropriate here.
Putting in a guy like "Joe Kennedy" was very sly. This "trick" on voters has been used before. The idea is that voters who do not know better will vote for a "Kennedy" with great ideas. This would in turn, take away votes from the Republican and ensure a Democratic win.
People, wake up!
Government is corrupt.
capevideo 1 year ago
I saw the debate with Brown, Coakley and Kennedy and I was impressed with Kennedy. He's not glamorous but I like his standpoint: cut taxes, cut spending, close down the borders, get out of wars to keep us safe and rely on internal security. Sounds good to me. Hope Brown remembers some of what Kennedy said. He's probably the only Kennedy in Massachusetts who LOST votes because of his name.
lhcarter 2 years ago 3
wow kennedy a voice of reason! How unusual for a politiician. Dems think the feds will just supplement any short comings they have.
joe035 2 years ago 3
romney care= obama care. same thing. what do you idiotic party line scott brown supporters not realize about that? scott brown and martha coakley are the same candidate. both are socialists.
annica570 2 years ago 3
God Bless You Joe Kennedy!!! After hearing about the death threats coming from the Brown campaign towards your family Mr. Kennedy... I will gladly donate money towards your campaign...
Keep spreading the message of personal liberty!!
Itsaneiljohnsonthing 2 years ago 2
Ok, so your quick to shoot down the other two candidates but please explain how Joe Kennedy plans on fixing the problem? Because all I hear is him reiterating the problem...Just my thought
UbErIriSh 2 years ago
I think his solution is to...
CUT GOVERNMENT SPENDING.
We can't afford Obama care, or any other huge program of its size because we are 12 trillion dollars in debt....
you want to talk about a REAL problem? there it is...
snux099 2 years ago
Joe Kennedy for Senate! Thank you, Joe, for taking a stand and not backing down. We will NOT support a socialist or a neocon! YOU deserve our vote... not Brown or Coakley.
thinkrevolution 2 years ago
Scott Brown for Massachusetts Senate.
Mr02shadow 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Don't waste your vote - Martha Coakley is depending on people splitting their votes between Kennedy and Scott Brown - basically what it comes down to is: if you vote for Kennedy you're voting for Coakley.
Please vote for Scott Brown and lower taxes.
DONGOE 2 years ago
DONGOE... Who told you to repeat that? Rush Limbaugh? Fox News? Get off your ass and stop watching TV. You sound like a damned parrot in a cage.
thinkrevolution 2 years ago
I don't think that it is fair to say that Brown wants to spread Romney care across the Country.
And Coakley is for Obama care; are you retarded?
coffeefish 2 years ago
I wrote a letter to the boston globe endorsing Brown. If he can help stop this insanity it is worth it. I think Joe Kennedy is the better man, but he has no chance of winning. Any vote for him will
assure a Coakely win. Who knows mayby the Coakley people put kennedy up to this.
josephdupont 2 years ago
The dems did that in the Jersey 2009 governors election. They paid the independent to take away votes from the republicans, and still lost. Liberals are pigs.
NJRocks281 2 years ago
I want to know who is against mandatory health insurance! Mandtory health insurance is unconsitutional.
josephdupont 2 years ago 3
yes it is, and sadly that is not an issue for washington and much of the country. shamefully the vast majority of the federal gov activities and spending is unconstitutional. america deserves the currency and economic collapse that is at our doorstep. our ignorance and arrogant foolishness is almost unbelievable. its the american peoples fault at this point, we can no longer blame politicians. we vote for them
slickbtk 2 years ago 2
I AGREE!
Dastgreene 2 years ago
Both brown and kennedy
M2sterK1lla 2 years ago
He has my vote. I almost he was running forgot because independents don't get crap for air time against the big business Dems and Repubs but win or not I will let my voice be heard.I know he is not as personable as say Martha or Scott ,but Honesty over face value any day.
jsh78mang 2 years ago 2
Joe Kennedy makes sense here.
workedant 2 years ago 2
Joe brings up a lot of great points but he should have openly discredited both candidates and challenged them on the issues.
wachman 2 years ago 2
Joe Kennedy has my vote!
libertarianjury 2 years ago 2
So Scott Brown supports the federal healthcare bill??? Is Brown a RINO?
SpectrumRob 2 years ago 7
Scott Brown supported forced health care in Massachusetts, the first and most costly plan in the USA. This makes Brown a true big government liberal.
He will bail out any banker in Washington. He will not restrain the Federal Reserve. He will not do anything to upset the big government machine.
MrWakethesheeple 2 years ago 8
Brown says he doesn't support the federal bill, but he DOES support the MA version of socialized medicine that fines businesses if they don't provide healthcare. He also says he supports exporting that system to every other state. As a US Senator, he or Coakley would have the ability to do that.
Brown doesn't oppose socialized medicine on principle, he just opposes the Obama plan on a few technical details. He stated in the debate that he wishes to export the MA system to other states.
libertarianjury 2 years ago 2
Brown supported Romneycare, and advocates exporting the MA version of socialized medicine to all 50 states. He has publicly called himself a pragmatist (ie: no philosophy but "range of the moment"). As a US Senator he would be in a position to "compromise" and vote away the freedoms of everyone in the US, not just the people of MA, as he did while he was in office as a state legislator.
The term RINO (Republican In Name Only) is very appropriate here.
Brown = Coakley.
libertarianjury 2 years ago 3