Added: 5 years ago
From: phanzana
Views: 36,898
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (134)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The funny thing about hoaxers is that some claim wires, and some claim sped up video. Neither really makes much sense.

  • Focus on the arm movements, and you'll notice how unnatural they are. You can tell this wasn't real time slowed down to make it look like they're on the moon, it was real time, on the moon footage sped up.

  • @ShooterInfinity It was real time on the moon footage, and the process of speeding it up on this youtube video to try and support a possible hoax theory, show that the original speed is the true speed. I deducted this just from how unnatural the arm movements are at "double speed".

  • If you focus and imagine that he is a guy on a really steep incline, and he is attached to a bungee. It really stands out after you watch it a few times.

  • Keep in mind people that these spacesuits are INFLATED to at least about 10 psig so that the astronauts can feel normal Earth conditions inside.

    This makes the suits extremely rigid. It is like trying to flex a football each time you bend any joint in the body.

    Plus, the suit is about as massive as the astronaut himself. You try jumping with inflated leggings and with another person on your back.

  • Hello everyone

    I am NNRpart2

    You know me and my thoughts and comments

    Don't fall for CHEAP imitations

    Keep a keen eye from now on

    There are people out here that are cloning accounts to try to discredit members

    They are only doing this because their NASA house of cards is tumbling down

    They are too dumb to debate so they revert to cloning and discrediting

    You can NOW ALL SEE the feeble minds of the moon walk BELIEVERS

    Want TRUTH remember NNRpart2 the ONE and ONLY !

  • If they were really on the moon, they'd jump higher. At 1/6 Earth's gravity, wtf?

  • @f56789123 Dude... That costume weights 91kg + it's really hard to move in it. They been in the moon and there is plenty ways how to prove it.

  • @f56789123

    Hey dummy those suits are very restrictive and heavy, on Earth they'd barely be able to move. They ARE jumping 6 times higher than they could on Earth.

    Why are hoax believers so fuckass stupid?

  • @TheJomogogo why are you such a fuckass period?

  • @TheJomogogo

    Well it still doesn't answer why the sand moves/fall a hell of a lot faster then the astronaut.

  • Retroflectors? what a joke, hiihhiih

  • looks like teletopis xD

  • What i dont get is; why those who claim a hoax must prove it was a hoax, when theres not a single proof they really did it in first place. Only stupid videos like these and the government word

  • @SpikeGhost88 what about the retroreflectors on the moon left from the original Apollo 11 mission, telescopic images of the lunar landers still on the moon's surface, and moon rocks? "LOL IT'S FAKE BECAUSE IT'S FAKE"

    K good for you then. Ignore evidence. forget about being rational or exercising reason, moon landing never happened because YOU SAID THERE IS NO EVIDENCE, THUS THERE IS NO EVIDENCE

    That is mind-blowing. Tell NASA lol

  • @BecuzIt In mars they put all kinda shit also... though Men never been there.

    ITS TRUE CAUSE NASA AND USA GOVERNMENT along with the media SAID SO. Great, Lucky you they Didn't tell u to fit a baseball bat up ur asses ¬¬

  • @SpikeGhost88 Yeah instead of doing any worthwhile research, just believe what a few videos and webpages on the internet say. We had the technology to go to the moon

    you know what you're probably right

    Herp I guess Mars and the moon and other celestial bodies are fake too, just cuz we have satellites that can project their image

    Galileo? Never existed. History is written by those in charge right?

    Wait a second did I say satellites are real? No they're fake because THERE IS NO PROOF!

    lmao you

  • @BecuzIt hihihi big arguments, bro

    Now U gotta think, was there a reason to lie? At the edge of cold war? and maybe u gonna understand.

    Use ur brain. C'mon, cant be that hard =)

  • @SpikeGhost88 Wow is everyone in Brazil this stupid?

  • Comment removed

  • @TheFACTSRUS - If everyone in Brazil is stupid? Not quite. Only those manipulated by the media xD

  • @SpikeGhost88 Don't forget, the Russians also admitted we did it. Do you really believe they would have let us get away with a hoax like that when they had the equipment to tell where the signals were coming from? Look at how high the astronaut jumps. Try that while barely bending your legs and while wearing a 300 lb suit!

  • The hilarious thing abut the "hoaxers" is the ease at which one can refute everything they claim. I mean, if they are going to LEAD with "no stars in the photos" what do they expect?

  • Comment removed

  • @lilsm555 One astronomer isn't all scientists in the world. x.x

  • Comment removed

  • The movement of the arm looks all unnatural. If it would have been slowed down images, it would look normal at a faster speed, but it doesnt.

  • stupid video 

  • Huston, we have a problem here. Our guy just took of!

  • two jumps and the flap seen in the photo doesnt apear, yea they are on the moon

  • @datzfast

    HOLY SHIT THERE'S NO STARS IT MUST BE FAKE DURHHHHHH

  • @TheJomogogo you cant see stars with a fucking camera in space look it up

  • @XboxRevolutionGaming

    I was being sarcastic dumbass look it up.

  • @TheJomogogo well im sorry but i thought u just commented but u were replying to someone

  • @XboxRevolutionGaming

    No problem I'be done the same it's hard to tell since moon hoax advocates are so goddamn stupid.

  • @TheJomogogo There are only stars on earth. The moon's gravity is too weak to hold down stars.

  • @beneehall That's the dumbest thing I ever heard, and I think the moon landing was a hoax. The Earth's gravity does not hold down stars you moron. Stars are millions of lighht years away. Next to the sun, the closest star is 4.2 light years. Don't be an idiot, please.

  • Look how high he's jumping, with only a tiny bend of the knees. Let's see you do that, even without all the spacesuit stuff on. Even basketball players have to squat to jump that high from a dead stop.

  • @boulderdsvo You can clearly see the strings dude.

  • @EweTubee No, you can see them, in your imagination. I can't. I can't even see the whip antenna on the top of the backpack in this one, which many hoax believers mistake for wires.

  • @boulderdsvo Dude just look it up, the string is clearly evident, theres even one where the astronaut is yanked up by accident and his feet weren't even touching the ground, lol its actually pretty funny.

  • @EweTubee No, really, I can't see a cable, nor an antenna, which is what the 'cable' actually is. Please give a link to the "funny" video.

  • @boulderdsvo If this is fake, it's not that hard to attach wires to the man and lift him up. They can easily cover something like that up afterwards.

  • Hello everyone

    I am NNRpart2

    You know me and you know my thoughts and comments.

    Don't fall for CHEAP imitations.

    Keep a keen eye from now on.

    There are people out here that are cloning accounts to try to discredit members.

    They are only doing this because their NASA house of cards is tumbling down.

    They are too dumb to debate so they revert to cloning and discrediting.

    I guess you can NOW ALL SEE the feeble minds of the moon walk BELIEVERS.

    Want TRUTH remember NNRpart2 the ONE and ONLY !

  • If you got kids, you got spills. Zorbeez is the amazing multi-purpose cloth with advanced X27 fiber technology with the strength and muscle to pick up and hold 20 oz. of liquid! Whether it's coffee, wine, soda or milk, spills big or small, Zorbeez gets it all! Don't fall for CHEAP imitations

  • I wish i could jump that high up. I'd be able to dunk a basketball twofold XD

  • how does this prove anything?

    Oh yea IT DOEN'T

  • nasa =need another seven astronauts

    fake video

  • ohhh HOLY SHIT IF WE SPEED THE CAMERA UP IT LOOKS FAKE SO IT MUST BE FAKE OH FUCK WE'VE PROVED IT NOW LOLOLOL

  • you stupid fuck -it was ALL a LIE and a CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY.

  • @generalhercules Smells like hoax believers bitting tons of moon dust because of a bunch of already debunked hoax beliefs.

    Thumbs up if you guys agree.

  • The way his legs wobble when jumps up is funny

  • You can even run at quad speed and it would still show, that curve and the duration of the jump clearly proves that they are not on earth. How foolish can people be to see earth gravity in this vid?

  • 2X speed is wrong. It must be 1.5X speed and you can clearly see it like it's on earth :-) so nothing else as the truth

  • Actually, 1.5x is way, way wrong. Oh, it looks more natural in some ways, but it's completely wrong in other ways,specifically to do with how fast things fall and related motions, like pendulums.

    /watch?v=kojsfbN8ulc

    And it would also have to be in a vacuum, otherwise the pendulum would slow down faster.

    /watch?v=Ts6lU9dkYiE

  • no, 1,5 is the perfect speed! You can fake "falling" things with manipulation like wires and motors.

    we talk here about the speed and not "falling" things....

  • A wire on every grain of dust?

    Right. . . .

    /watch?v=y4fPiwdnAwk

  • nonononono.. watch this video here. And?? The dust is falling much FASTER as the astronaut! But that cannot be! In vakuum EVERY material must fall on the ground in the same speed!!

    That is the total proof that this is a Nasa-fake! :-)

    The dust falls here mnuch faster down because the astronaut hgangs on a wire - simple is that. Play this video in 1.5 speed and "Viola" BUSTED :-)

  • Do you view links or do you just spout of preconceived notions? All falling things ACCELERATE at the same rate in a vacuum, not SPEED.

  • HAHAHAHAHA you don't know nothing what you are writing abvout... I don't spout out proceived notions like you or something like that... . I tell you FACTS! And

  • you can call the accelerate SPEED on the moon because for some centimenters it makes no really difference.. and you know what I mean! If you take a feather and a hammer on the moon and let them falling, the MUST have the same speed (or acceleration)! And sand TOO and human body TOO! So that is a Nasa fake I with this argument I won :-)

    it IS fake! can only be a fake...

  • An astronaut may very well jump higher then his dust. If you want to accurately measure the rate of decent to compare, you measure separately from when each starts falling.

  • blablablablabla...

  • . . .blah blah. . .laws of physics. . .blahblah. . . you're introducing avoidable errors. . . blah. . .watch the video, and then explain what's wrong with its findings, if you can.

    w w w [.] youtube [.] com/watch?v=y4fPiwdnAwk

    Blah, blah.

  • againm blablablablbalbalblablabala lool. watch the sand, it falls TOO FAST to the ground.. moon grav is 1/6 to earth grav. you are boring it exist 1000 facts that it was a nasa Fake!! the gravity, the speed, the vakuum, and much more.... . if you can proof that this facts are unture, you are good. other wise you are boring an annoying

  • and the link is crap.. it proofes nothing LOL :-D

  • Why, in Earth gravity, would both the dust and the astronaut fall the same distance from the height of their respective parabola, if one was being supported by wires? Because that's what that video shows. Unless you can show otherwise, this discussion is over.

    Good day to you.

  • Odd how moontards see what they want to see. Dust looks like it's settling as expected on the moon.

  • moon hoax.

  • Yes odd how MOONTARDS see what they are told to see.

    MOONTARD aka someone who buys the official NASA story and seems to worship their god Apollo.

    Fake moon set with a soil consisting of dry cement and sand. All done with video and image manipulation.

    Did you know the Dutch found out their gift from the US, the moon rock is a FAKE?

  • Wow. So a rock in a man's personal collection for 20 years then donated to a museum from his personal effects at death was fake. So what? Some Dutch big shot probably has a moon rock in his sock drawer. How about the other 800+ pounds brought back, are you saying they're fake too?

  • Yeah it is fake as well. That's why they keep them all locked away.

  • even the ones in museums to this day are fake - this has been a CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY.

  • FINALLY someone who knows the truth -my friend these fools who think we went to the moon are actually nasa Plants - this is actually what nasa does with the money LIE LIE LIE - A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY.

  • @generalhercules

    oh HOLY SHIT THERE'S NO STARS IT MUST BE TEH FAKE LOLOL

  • The moon landing may- or may not - have been a hoax. I am open to all sides.

    However, simply showing "sped up" versions of astronauts, moon rovers, etc proves absolutely nothing!

    I could film myself walking underwater with weights on my legs and I would be moving VERY SLOW. But if you sped the film up, it would appear that I was moving at "normal speed." Does that mean I wasn't "really" underwater?

    So speeding up moon footage doesn't prove a thing!

  • I do not think man has left our atmosphere, but this is a pathetic attempt at proof of hoax.

  • Who tilted the camera up to follow the blast off from the moon surface on the Apollo 11 moon landing in 1969?

  • The footage you are referring to was not taken on the Apollo 11 mission. It was Apollo 15-17 that those shots were taken. Apollo 17 was the only successful tilt-up shot. The camera was remotely controlled by mission control and they had to time it just right due to signal delay.

  • They had an automatic camera that would pan up as the lander took off

  • cool they are jumping faster now... i wonder what would happen if you slowed it down double?!?!?! ohhhhh!

  • You can tell by how jerky his movements are (especially in the arms), and how slowly he still moves up and down as he jumps, that this was indeed not faked.

  • @LeLimeLine

    He is restricted within his suit, therefore his arm movements are restricted downward, thus the sudden stop and/or upward motion. As for jumping, he is not restricted except possibly bending at the knees to jump.

  • note that Apollo 11 astronauts never had any special protection (they don't even know what special protection needed)back then but they're free from cancer. why?ever wonder why astronauts nowadays never worked beyond Van Allens Belt even for couple of hours?.Neil Armstrong and the rest of 12 astronauts did it hours of exposure to radiation beyond the belt .Big mystery

  • 39 astronauts, including a few from the Apollo missions, have radiation-induced cataracts. Look it up.

  • Not that big a mystery... We're not _doing_ anything beyond the belts.

    The best place for a space station is low, low Earth orbit.

    Magnetic field shields a lot of radiation. You can stay for a long time. Cheaper to sent cargo. Wind drag clears the space of most debris rapidly.

    Lots safer.

    Yup, Apollo was not safe. That doesn't mean we didn't do it, but if we're not going to the Moon, there's no need for the superfluous danger of higher orbits.

  • Even Dr. James Van Allen, the discoverer of the Van Allen radiation belts, rebutted the claims that radiation levels were too dangerous for the Apollo missions.

  • might as well see this

    utubdotcum/watch?v=oeKs826uplM­&NR=1

    listen to these people from Destination Tomorrow of NASA Mark Weyland SRAG manager

    Dr Marcelo Vasquez and Mary Van Baleen space radiation health officer.listen to their words.

  • Instead of being able to jump at least ten feet high in "one sixth" gravity, the highest jump was about nineteen inches

  • Probably because they weighed 3 times as much with the suits on. Look how much hang time they had only 19 inches off the ground. You jump 19 inches into the air and tell me how long you're up for.

  • I can't even jump 19 inches in the air on Earth, and I'm reasonably athletic.

  • how is that possible the fact that you can't survive extreme radiation from solar flares on moon and cosmic rays. they can't return home safely. how come NASA can't send men on moon after 30 yrs inspit of the fact we r much technologically advance 30 yrs ago and

  • Because no one will fund it, and there's no reason to go. It's political now, not technological.

  • Wrong. It's the van Allen belt that posed any sort of danger to the astronauts, and only then if an unexposed human was there long enough. The astronauts passed through the belt in a short time and the metal of their ships hull, as designed, blocked most of the radiation.

  • I suppose thats correct but Cosmic Rays are extremely rare, it hits earth twice every so often and we dont send men to the moon because we've done it, our priority is to find life and other thingsd on other planets

  • " astronaut" never jumped higher than about 1-2 feet, he should have jumped about 6 feet at least but he didnt did he?

  • They could and did jump higher then 1-2 feet, but they tended to land on their ass when they did that,

    watch?v=16D0hmLt-S0

  • The astronauts are speed-up 2x. Funny moves. Rubbish anyway. The moondust is the proof of actual moonlanding. Look at it, spreading in 1/6 gravity. That's impossible on earth.

  • Eh... video looks... sped up. Funny tho.

  • Well, that is obviously NOT actual live action speed.  What's the point of this video?

  • remember that those suits are something like 200 pounds each. They wouldn't even be able to get those things off the ground more than an inch in the earth's gravity.

    Also there is actually solid proof that we did land on the moon. During one of the Apollo missions they left a mirror on the surface of the moon which we can bounce a laser off of from the earth to measure very precisely the distance from the earth to the moon. We've learned that the moon is slowly drifting away from the earth.

  • Is it solid proof that the moon's drifting? Or is it like Pluto where it's elipse (I think) is furthar from earth at one point and closer in another?

  • Nope. There are lasers all around the world that measure the distance. So scientists would have figured out that sort of thing by now. I mean, after 50 years you'd think so, right?

  • Dang, that's cool then

  • The flags on the moon did flap but that was because they're hanging from a wire across the top. When they were bumped or hit, the flag naturally moved and since there is no air to slow it down it continued to flap until the energy in it dissipated. Once that stops, the flags hang perfectly still.

  • LOOOOOL, GO BACK TO SLEEP, THERE'S ALSO A SCENE WHERE THE SPACE MAN WALKS PAST THE FLAG, AND IT DOES NOT MOVE, THATS BECAUSE THERE'S NO AIR ON THE MOON,

    HEY KIDS YOU CAN TRY THIS EXPERIMENT AT HOME, PROVIDED YOU HAVE CURTAINS.

    CLOSE YOUR CURTAINS AND WAVE YOUR HAND SLOWLY IN FRONT, WOW YOU SEE WHAT HAPPENS YOU DISPLACE THE AIR, AND IT MAKES THE CURTAINS MOVE. THIS DOESNT HAPPEN WHEN THE SPACE MEN WALK PAST THE FLAG, WHY, COS THERE'S NO AIR.

    the russians, yer they never said a thing about it?

  • i have heard that actualy, thats suttin that they found when first went up, which is why none of the other moon missions were on the TV, as they didnt know what might show up! one of the other stories is the space ships there, like an alien drive thru so to speak, but who knows, i just know they went 6 times an apollo 13 didnt make it.

    i have seen the photos of the clouds, but im not so sure, there aint no magnetic field as the moon has no molton iron core, unless the earths field stretches out

  • You suprised me , i thought i was going to get some flack from you .

    I dont believe any of the Apollo missions got to the moon .

    NASAs black budget space program did and still do .

    Their anti gravity drives get them there in a hour .

    The moon is hollow and artificial .

    It is an alien ship/base and has been here about 6000 years (may be out a bit ).

    This explains why only one side faces Earth at all times and there is much more craters on the back side.

  • Haha. Lmao.

  • it only "waved" when he placed it and it moved when he was pushing it around

  • Hey, Dumbass will you fuckin think for a second? There is no air, resulting in no air resistance. So while he was moving it, the flag's movement was exagerated.

  • im a professional film editor. his legs are twitching like they are speed up instead of normal speed.

  • People who think we didnt go to the moon are just cunts.

    When the guy jumps he's up in the air for longer than normal.

    dick heads.

  • Funny, no one here talks about the "wind in the flag"...

  • flag doesn't move

  • IF the moon landing is a hoax. Why did the astronauts went into the Saturn V?!

  • the suits could have had metal rods in side to keep the actors looking stiff and unatural looking

  • MAybe those suits had to be made of fucking metal foils and thick composites to stop the solar radiation and prevent the suits exploding... you know, from pressure differential.

  • there is radiation but not deadly, equiv of 2-3 chest xrays per day.

  • DOH!!! boy did this one backfire! Thanks for proving they really went, yet again.

  • He seems to walk normal i agree, but why does his hand move so fast at 0.04?? it seems to me that the heavy suit would prevented him from doing so.

    For all 'believers': wires cant speed up your arm movements in a stiff space suit...

    Conclusion, just that it looks like walking/ normal jumping at double speed, doesnt mean it IS normal walking or jumping.

  • Do a simple test. Video tape someone jumping like the guy in the video. You'll notice that compared to the guy in the video, your subject falls to the ground faster! This even when the archive footage is sped-up! People should do simple tests like these before they write stuff off as hoaxes.

  • he's held up on a wire ass.

  • whats a wire ass?

  • ha ha ha, oh wait, no, your a douche bag.

  • original.

  • You neglect the fact that the guy's right arm moves far too rediculously fidgety to be physically possible by a person (maybe was high tek robotz!!)

  • The Hoax Kooks claim that moon walking footage is just earthbound actors shown at half normal speed. If so, this is supposed to be the natural speed of the events. It sure looks twitchy and un-natural to me. Thanks for the credible proof the landings were real.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more