Added: 1 year ago
From: AtheistMediaBlog
Views: 9,804
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (230)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • They may try to assassinate him like Salman Rusdie for telling the facts about the islamic way.

    

  • I think this guy is a pedophile

  • what a wonderful religion that a writer can't publish a book because some childish muslims will be offended by some bronze age traditions.

  • My name Mohammed. I can't read or write and my epileptic spasms make me look like a moron. During my spasms, I can see an angel with 2 horns, who speaks to me. He says he comes from god, I believe him.

    The angel says that I shall do whatever I like and kill everyone who is in my way and when asked about it, I shall say that god allowed it. That's a very nice angel. That angel also told me to touch little girls and fuck them when nobody''s looking. I like that a lot.

  • That is one guy I wouldn't mind if they wanted to do in.

  • Many people don't want to be educated and prefer to hang onto their prejudice.

  • Prophet my behind. Deepok didn't write the truth because he's afraid some lunatic Muslim would come after himw

  • If a book publisher in the USA is afraid of publishing a book with a particular cover, because a group of people are not going to like it and are going to riot and kill innocents, well then I would say this is worse than 9/11. America was supposed to be the land of the free and the brave, but now it appears some people are willing to give up freedom for the sake of a kushy life and well bravery is immaturity and tribalism...etc....

  • What is this about Barnes and Nobel asking for the cover to be changed and Deepak Chopra saying that would apologies if somebody was offended? So you American people have voluntarily relinquished the freedom of speech? Barnes and Noble no longer trusts the American Police and the American Government? Barnes and Noble is ready to give up "freedom of speech"? Its clear from all these statements that the terrorists have won, they have managed to strike fear into the hearts of book publishers.

  • The very fact that Chopra, despite all his fallacies and his peddling BS spirituality, writes about Mohammed has Muslim commentators in this video foaming in the mouth like a rabid dog, says a lot about the nature of Islam.

  • This guy is the biggest tool i've ever seen! He waffles worse than i do in my academic papers when i have to reach a specific word quota. To borrow from something Hitchens said, 'if you performed an enema on Deepak Chopra, he'd be the size of matchbox'

  • Some people may say that Deepak is writing another book for money. A free book will probably be used as a disposable toilet paper by those materialistic people who evaluates everything with money. It's not Deepak's problem to ask for money, it's our problem for not listening to good words for free.

  • chopra is like the ultimate bullshitter. I haven't heard such bs in my life.

  • Deepoak Chopra is The teacher of time he is a gift to Humanity

  • Why allah cannot take a form? How can he be God if he cannot take a form?

  • @harishkumar09 We will see God on the Day of Judgement, not in this life.

  • It is an entirely different thing that poor Salman Rushdie was hounded by the muslim countries for referencing this incident. He was accused of blaspheming the prophet. Well , thats exactly what the Quran does.

  • Vivekananda could say such a thing, because he was not into selling books and making moolah. He was a genuine authentic realised soul who was interested in telling the truth. Interestingly this theory of Swami Vivekananda is corraborated by the Quran itself which says Mohammad was possessed by Satan briefly, from which emerged the Satanic Verses, but Mohammad discovered he was being fooled and he rejected those verses. 

  • Swami Vivekananda says Mohammad went mad because he practised yoga without a Guru. As a result he reached a state of consciousness which caused him to be possessed by dark forces and so Vivekananda says "so therefore, because of this(madness), there is good things in the Quran, but also bad things which has caused much suffering to Mankind by way of religious wars". And he continues, "So I tell you, don't practised yoga without a Guru lest you end up like Mohammad".

  • @harishkumar09 Swami Vivekananda makes a lot of baseless and erroneous claims. Muhammad practiced yoga without a Guru? Muhammad (p) did meditate, and he did come into contact with Gnostics and adherents of other belief systems and philosophies. However, your point is irrelevant as you go on to claim that he was affected by dark forces. This is similar to the Christian claim that Muhammad (p) was possessed and received his commands from the devil. Equally ludicrous.

  • @ManifestationOfTruth

    And why is it ludicrous? Mohammad himself claims he was possessed by Satan and certain verses in the Quran had to be discarded for this reason. Forget Vivekananda, forget the Bible, Mohammad himself claims he was temporarily possessed by Satan (Shaitan) and he received commands from the devil which he mistook to be the Angel Gabriel.

  • Man this is the stupidiest interview ive ever seen

  • this guy is even more stupider than muslims !!! BUT he acts like he is an all knowing super phsycic orr somthing. Fuck this cunt!

  • @llHyRaXll

    How is he stupid?

    He is trying to create peace between cultures

    You are probably one of those fat-cat politicians making billion$ off of the Iraq war and Sept 11th demolition job 

  • @JohnnyPeacemaker no dumb fuck. i am against the iraq and vietnam war and against cconservatives and republicans.. fuck and and choprah

  • @llHyRaXll

    You are so smart you run down moderate and peaceful muslims, as well as people who seek to create peace and understanding between cultures as Chopra does.

    You are against Iraq war, yet you hate Muslims??

    What a paradox you are

    Show off your intellect and character and get back with something astounding to back up your hatred and aggressive viewpoints

  • @JohnnyPeacemaker your an idiot...YES i am against the iraq war, yet i hate muslims, just like im against the vietnam war yet i hate buddhists....dumb ass

  • @llHyRaXll

    Are just abrasive online, or do you act out in these ways in person?

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • stupid man, contributing even more stupidity into this world by writing a book about a stupid religion (all religions are)

  • I'm more than a little impressed that Chopra has the courage to do this. BTW I generally dislike his "philosophy".

  • Comment removed

  • chopra your playing with fire your kids and wife will cry think of them

  • i wanna read his book...i am gonna buy it =)

  • Shame on Deepak Chopra for writing such a nonsensical book full of false accusations and lies.

    .

    The holy Prophet Muhammad (SAW) married Hazrat Aisha (Rad) when she was over 19 years old. Search video: Age of Aisha (Rad).

    .

    Also, the holy Prophet Muhammad (SAW) lived the most pure, honourable, righteous, pious, kind, sincere, and best life ever. There are NO contradications, there is instead beauty, perfection, and greatness! SHAME on Deepak Chopra, he is a criminal!

  • Do you know what is amassing? I told my son , Do you know why Jews killed Jesus? because he cleaned house of worship from business. My son responded: “Dad I was not there and I do not believe those things people wrote and talked about him or any prophets, you have to find what was their motivation for writing those”. By this respond I find a 18 years old boy is more knowledgeable than Mr. Deepak Chopra, who calling himself a scholar!!!

    Takes many years and hard work to find about prophets.

  • mohammad sucks on allah's clit and fingers his anus WHAT A FUCKING MUD RACE CUNT

  • Interesting.  I should look his book up on Amazon.

  • What's the point? The story of Mohammad is mostly fiction anyway...No one actually heard God talking to him, which means he more than likely had temporal lobe epilepsy...From all accounts he sounds like a violent dwarf, prone to sexual deviance and making shit up....If he were alive today he'd be a cross between Joe Pesci and Peter Sutcliff.

  • @rogan71

    you should have the above as your PhD Thesis; I am PRETTY sure Harvard or any prestigious univ. will beg you to join them!

    douchebag...

  • @FrukSkoFcsae - Whatever....But we're told by Muslims how noble Mohammad was, but there's only accounts of him acting like a dick, and possibly beheading children and raping women...Seriously, I read his biography....I was left feeling he was insane, and almost certainly made the Quran up himself...Otherwise he would have changed the 'satanic verses',l claiming the Devil made him write them...I almost certainly could write a thesis on how ignorant Muslims are!

  • @rogan71

    Hahahahaha, wow you are one racists, are you talking about muhammed or christian priests or the crusades.

    Mohammed was voted top 10 men in history by a Christian.

    Muslims believe in Jesus christ, you have lots of hate, u must want us to die for israel.

    Reveal you agenda TRAITOR!

  • @isNOTrael - What are you prattling on about?

  • Watch. Some muslims are going to use his book to start a bonfire and no one will give a shit.

  • Deepak- muslims worldwide are going to be offended by your book.1.You should say (PBUH) not just mohamad and it is a insult! 2. you said he married a 6 yrs old girl ,it can true but you should not mention it to the nonmuslims.3.You call prophet mohamad a warrior? dont you know islam means peace?...why are you relating jews to the writing of Alquran? so in a nutshell we issue Fatwah and you should be beheaded!~Allah hu akhbar!..this is a cheap tactic by Deepak to make money! enemy of islam!

  • BEHEAD HIM!

  • I kinda like this. Finally he's showing some cahoneys.

  • Putting the word 'fictionalized' in front of anything Deep-crack Choda writes is a little redundant.

  • So funny to see all the various religious nuts getting involved in this mosque thing.

    If I was president at the time, those twin towers would have been built back immediately, exactly as they were (with appropriate updates... code has surely changed over the decades). The message being: knock 'em down if you like, but we'll put them back up in less time than it took you to plan the attack.

    It is only just now, nine years later, that anything is being done. That sends a bad message.

  • : ( <--- Muhammad

  • @rockimusprime ... No! You are a disgusting liar. The holy, pure, perfect, and infallible Prophet Muhammad (SAW/Peace be upon him) is NOT as you say!

    .

    The most beautiful person ever is the holy, pure, perfect, and infallible Prophet Muhammad (SAW/Peace be upon him) who IS the most honourable, righteous, pious, kind, sincere, handsome, pure, intelligent, honest, modest, and GREATEST man ever.

  • Comment removed

  • Liberal atheists defnd Muslims, Conservative atheists defend theocons. I think all 4 of them suck. But Islam is the worst of them all.

  • Islam is trash. I want to get some Koranic toilet paper so people can wipe their butts on that crap

  • I think it speaks to just how bad this whole mosque debacle has become when Deepak Chopra of all people stands out as a voice of reason.

  • That being said, he's still a crackpot. The irony of this whole thing is just over-the-top ridiculous.

  • Chopra used to bring his son to Michael Jackson's house for fucks. :O

  • Fuck muhammad

  • Should we begin planning his funeral?

  • @dbzman1985 HAHAHAHAHAA!!!!!!!

  • Pointless semantic masturbation. Religion is a fairy tale for the weak and a power seeking tool for corrupt minds.

  • @drreedindeed The bible speaks of when all the worlds religons will be pulled apart from the worlds governments and the whole worlds religons will be destroyed. ( the harlot babylon the great thrown from the beast) at which point Mankind will declare they have acieved peace and security. then armagedon will begin. i think this athiestic movement is just a full fill ment of this prophcy.

  • He can do what ever he wants and I hope nothing stops him. It's the 21st century and about time people grew up and stopped bitching over fucking novels.

    P.s. Last time this reporter met Deepak, the latter was get pwned by Shermer and Harris.

  • Chopra is the biggest charlatan in existence today. Money-grabbing cunt.

  • Deepak Chopra is a snake-oil selling piece of shit.

  • I want to issue my own atheist fatwa against Deepak Chopra. BRING ME HIS HEAD!

  • Somebody give Deepak Chopra a quantum spiritual elbow in his moronic, smug face already!

  • @SerenityNoww

    Are you jealous of his intellect or just unable to grasp deeper concepts?

    Can you grasp the quantum leap of trying to create peace between islam and the rest of the world?

    He represents the west as well as India which is a tipping point and volatile place as evidenced by the Mumbai attacks

  • Religion is bullshit, but I bet that Chopra can see into the future with those big ass spectacles!

  • I'd prefer him to write a fictional biography about himself, where he talks some fucking sense.

  • Threats of violence and everyone runs scared! Religion of peace my ass!

  • A fictional version of Muhammad?  How is this different from the original version - the Quran?

  • Deepak Chopra - The King of "Woo Woo"

  • @III24601III

    Haha, that was the first thing I thought of when I saw this video in my subscription box.

  • @III24601III Ha Ha - I thought exactly the same!!! Woo-King... lol

  • Deepak Chopra is a drip.

  • This guy's chasing a paycheck wherever he can find it.

  • @Celticking36 Yes... But we all wish he was doing it for the lulz.

  • @Celticking36

    Isn't that the truth...but always the way of the world?

  • A fictional biography of Mohammad? Does that mean that Mohammad DOESN'T rape children in this version?

  • @Bueller007

    Oh, just got to that part of the vid. I guess not. Looks like he included that fact.

  • @Bueller007 High Five

  • I wonder if this shift in pace is due him getting his arse handed to him when debating god against Sam Harris?

    Still the king of woo woo.

  • @newo82 Oh Yeah - - that was such a good debate - was that the one where Leonard Mlodinow asked a question...?

  • I know this guy is an idiot but he may have stumbled onto something that may give the rest us a real thrill and a laugh. It will force some peoples hand. It is sure to stir up some perpetually angry persons. We may also get to see who really is "moderate" and who is less than peaceful. Especially in the U.S. Let's watch what happens.... 8-o

  • its not even a mosque, its a building facility.

  • He's such a useless man but at least he'll be offending a billion people a minority of whom might literally want his head for this.

  • So now he's writing fake biographies? Can't he stick to fake science and pseudo-intellectual bullshit? That's what I know and love him for, especially "non-local consciousness."

  • Now if only he would be this honest with everyone about his other books being fiction too. Quantum soup my ass.

  • it seems like any schmuck who wants to be popular simply has to attack muhammad

  • Lol the interviewer is like WTF!

  • i know india has many stupid people but he takes stupidity to a whole new level

  • Someone needs to Deepak this guys ego. Ive never been able to stand him. Hes a condescending con artist. How is he educating with a factitious story about a fictional character? His ego is so big it has its own time zone. Money grubbing greedy piece crap for a human being.

  • This guy's just a greedy phony. He's not trying to contribute to humanity; he's trying to take from it.

  • yep.. it's been done before.. about 1300 years ago

  • MAN people get worked up over nothing. So Deepak Chopra wrote controversial book to get attention. Are you going to get offended and give him the media visibility he craves? If you a Muslim, you most likely believe that he's going to burn in hell anyway. Why bother getting angry?

  • I'm burning all Chopras books along with the Koran

  • "My intention is not to offend"

    We know D-pack, you're intention is the same intention as always... to make $.

  • @snackynak err, make that *your*

  • You have balls. I like balls.

  • "Some scholars disagree with that characterisation". Mao was Chinese. "I DISAGREE WITH THAT CHARACTERISATION!". Fuck off, you can't disagree with facts.

  • bullshit his objective is to offend, carry one richard dawkins of the arabs

  • @arga400 His objective isn't to offend...he made that quite explicit. But what if it was...what difference would it make? The bullshit coming out of Chopra isn't qualitatively different from the bullshit in the Quran.

  • @Yakslipper that is exactly what im saying, except that i think it is meant to be offensive which i dont mind at all

  • Ok, interfaith dialogue sounds like a good idea, but you might want to consider having it somewhere you won't make certain people angry. How can you establish mutual understanding in different religious communities when most people are sensitive about 9/11!!?

  • His intention is not to offend. . . . Since when did that stop those pathetic people from getting offended?. . . They don't care about your intention they only see in black and white.

  • is it some indian thing to write about muhammad? He gonna get some fatwa shit goin down

  • There is no "alternative" medicine.

    Deepak Chopra is a fraud who misuses quantum mechanical bubble speech.

    He wrote the book to make some money with a controversial topic.

  • @pcuimac I agree completely. Chopra doesn't know a damn thing about quantum mechanics and like all other snake-oil salesmen, turns people away from real medicine, which has science to back it up.

  • Mohammad the story of a middle aged Arab pedophile, who lives on preying caravans, selling slaves, raping women, killing, torturing, and then a certain day, maybe due to syphilis, he started to hear voices! Yeah great story!

  • You shouldnt burn books for no reason. Fucking idiots. OH PLEASE Barnes and noble. Dont get scared by extremists. That's what they want. I mean, burning books to make people made is just stupid.

  • This seems like a good fit for Chopra. He should stick to writing fiction, since that is all that he is versed in.

  • cAn i HaZ fatwAzz??!?/!1!?1

  • This is just ridiculous.

    A. Deepak Chopra is doing this for attention.

    B. Lol at people calling this book a "fictional biography" as if the Koran is some sort of factual treatment of history, lol.

    C. If Muslims get pissed off at this, then they'll get pissed off at ANYTHING.

    D. Lol at the "he had a child bride, but some scholars disagree with that interpretation" No shit, of course they don't agree, it makes their prophet a fucking pedophile. Which he was.

  • @seanthedonconsidine

    In those times, that probably was a perfectly okay thing to do though. You have to excuse them, they knew little of the world, and most of what they thought they knew was made-up nonsense.

    The real problem lies in our times, when people still do these things, despite of what we know.

  • @Nerusai Your rationalizations are wrong, and here's why:

    A. I have heard that some Muslims say that Mohammed was against pedophelia. IF this is even true, that just makes him a hypocrite. Which is very uncharacteristic of "Allah's holy prophet".

    B. So if it is wrong, why did Allah permit it? If pedophelia was wrong, who cares if it was "culturally acceptable", why didn't Allah stop it? Why did Allah permit his holy prophet to be a pedophile? Why would Allah contradict obvious morality???

  • @seanthedonconsidine

    some Muslims = strawman argument. Plus, do we have any real evidence this Mohammed even ever existed?

    Perhaps you misunderstood my intent: I merely wished to point out that 2000 years ago, it could have been considered normal to have babies with a 12year old. But even if it was, our species has grown since then and we have various reasons to thoroughly condemn such behaviour now.

    PS. Allah doesn't stop anything, because gods are made-believe things that don't exist.

  • @Nerusai There have been some muslims who have told me that, yes. Not all of them have said that, but some have. It's like saying some christians are evolutionists.

    Well you have obviously misunderstood my post. MY point is that even if it was culturally and societally appropriate 2000 years ago to have childbrides, some morally superior god should have been above that, and told his people no.

    PS: I know that, I'm just trying to argue the theist mentality. I shouldn't have to explain this.

  • @seanthedonconsidine

    Saying some individuals say still never constitutes an argument. It's not a credible verifyable source after all.

    Anyway, perhaps you are letting your ethics get in your way. Clearly any god worth its own creation can decide upon what is moral and what isn't. Maybe your twisted logic prevents you from seeing the true glory that is (yegh).

    And I guess. Isn't theism completely dead yet? I was argueing more anthropologically.

  • @seanthedonconsidine

    Besides, I could temporarily convert to some theistic branch of a random idiotic faith (is there any other), so we can discuss properly. Although even in my more or less agnostic days, it always seemed silly to demand a god to be omni-everything.

    Who knows, there may come a time where we'll 'shit' new universes as a byproduct of energy creation. Does it make us gods? It definitely won't make us all the wiser :P

  • @seanthedonconsidine

    Any way, I get your point. Although still, I can imagine a theist falling back to that human ethics can't compare to godly ethics, so you're still wrong, or something.

    It's what they do after all. I've recently tried to teach biology to a creationist. And even showing obvious 'design' flaws of the human body just makes him shrug and say: oh, that's because of the fall, but the REST if perfect. (To every new flaw I point out).

    Catch-alls we call em :)

  • @Nerusai I'll respond to this post:

    If a theist said that I have my puny human ethics and god has his ethics, I merely just have to point out that god is wrong, and I am right. I say that pedophilia is wrong, while god accommodates it. Any god who accommodates pedophilia is not just, is not moral, and is not worthy of worship.

    Yes, the "it's because of the fall" is a nice little rationalization, especially since the bible mentions nothing about biological changes in humans, except childbirth.

  • @seanthedonconsidine

    But the theist would then point out that the made-up being they made up is considered perfect. So whatever it does is the right way. And if your human ethics says its wrong, you just failed to understand the godly ways.

    It falls under the catch-all of "you can't possibly conceive of what god thinks" together with "god is perfect".

    So a) god is right and b) trying to apply ethics to god is impossible. Pick your theist poison :P

  • @Nerusai Then all I have to do is point out that not only do they worship a god who accommodates pedophilia, but they also consider that "morally perfect". So then I just have to ask them "do you make accommodations for pedophilia? Is pedophilia ever ok?" If they say no, they lose, because they're disagreeing with their god. If they say yes, they lose, because they're saying pedophilia is sometimes ok. Either way, they lose.

  • @seanthedonconsidine

    A good theist would probably agree with that I suppose - I'm not even a bad theist, or a theist at all, so I'm not exactly sure, but if that's what the holy book says, it must be true, right?

    They however don't lose anything, unless they also have ethics I guess.

    And I personally know individuals that are practically raped every day, because the holy book says they should let their partner. And divorce is not an option.

    Having those experiences, I don't think they mind.

  • @Nerusai "And I personally know individuals that are practically raped every day, because the holy book says they should let their partner. And divorce is not an option.

    Having those experiences, I don't think they mind."

    Then they are hopelessly immoral, and are not even worth discussing this with.

  • @seanthedonconsidine

    Although perhaps I put that wrong.

    I think they mind.

    But I also think they will continue to do so anyway. They do not realize that the cost of winning is sometimes higher than that of defeat. And they do not realize that their defeat really is winning. And they do not realize reality simply is this way.

    Or don't want to, I'm not sure.

    Maybe it just takes time for their cogwheels to turn. They did grew up in highly religious backgrounds, and I do see change.

  • @Nerusai I'm not really sure of what you were saying in this post, but the point is: they are morally inferior because they support and espouse belief in a morally inferior doctrine and/or deity. They cannot and will not win. They can rationalize, change meanings, and distort all they want, but in the end, if they are intellectually honest, they will find that their position is hopeless.

  • @seanthedonconsidine

    I disagree. They are morally inferior, because morals are derived from ethics, and ethics are derived from thought, and they don't use thought to create ethics and morals. Instead they claim they have morals from some old dusty book, but these can't qualify as morals to begin with.

    But if they did, then you're definitely right.

  • @Nerusai The point is, they're morally inferior. I'm glad you agree, lol.

  • @seanthedonconsidine if Deepak is going to write a biography about Muhammad that goes against the current historical evidence we have of him (outside of the Quran, we DO have actual evidence he existed) then it is indeed fictional. Btw, the Quran does have SOME history, it predicted a victory of I think the persians over the Romans, a battle that was very one sided to the romans, and some scholars think it talks about alexander the great. I am an Atheist but I am partially playing devils

  • @seanthedonconsidine advocate here. Also, the pedophile thing is kind of stupid, cuz yea if you want to use todays standards, then Muhammad was a pedophile. But then.....so was everyone else. So I don't see the purpose of saying ''HE WAS A PEDOPHILE!!!!'' cuz it was common back then for women to marry at a very young age.

  • @farizzal But according to Islam the rules haven't changed since then.

  • @farizzal Your rationalizations are wrong, and here's why:

    A. I have heard that some Muslims say that Mohammed was against pedophelia. IF this is even true, that just makes him a hypocrite. Which is very uncharacteristic of "Allah's holy prophet".

    B. So if it is wrong, why did Allah permit it? If pedophelia was wrong, who cares if it was "culturally acceptable", why didn't Allah stop it? Why did Allah permit his holy prophet to be a pedophile? Why would Allah contradict obvious morality???

  • @seanthedonconsidine does it say that in the Quran? I don't recall it saying anything about pedos. Rape, sure, but back in that day pedophilia was nonexistent, as it was accepted to have sex with young girls. So ''Pedophilia'' actually came to existence only when we as a society marginalized it as wrong and sick. B. My answer would be that Allah doesn't exist. But lets assume he does, given that, I am pretty sure according to Islam that our free will from allah comes with non interference from

  • @seanthedonconsidine him, so that we are free to make our own choices, and the resulting evils are those that are products of our choices. But again, this raises problems for the Muslim, because in order to accept that allah would not interfere to prevent evils and moral wrongs, then they have to forsake the idea of prayer and divine favor towards them. Allah contradicts his own morality frequently, namely ''thou shalt not kill''.

  • @seanthedonconsidine I couldn't agree more.

  • @seanthedonconsidine lol well fucking said.

  • @seanthedonconsidine In all fairness, I think pedophilia was widely accepted back then and the Bible (I do realize we're talking about the Koran here) even set forth that fathers could sell their daughters into sexual slavery.

  • @isaachaze1 I'm so sick of hearing the "Cultural relativity" argument. Who cares if it was socially acceptable back then, the point is it IS IMMORAL. And if your god is moral, then why wasn't he against it??! Why would a moral GOD accommodate himself to an IMMORAL society?!

  • @seanthedonconsidine I wasn't exactly defending him (not sure what i was doing to be honest) and i get your point :). i dont have a god either

  • @isaachaze1 Playing devil's advocate (or in this case, Religion's advocate) is understandable if you want to challenge a certain line of reasoning, but cultural relativism is not a line of reasoning you can defend, it is one of the weakest and most pitiful copouts that a religious person has.

    That's good, sinful, heathen godlessness is the way to go. =P

  • In minute 2:352:50 Chopra and the reporter talk about Chopra’s insinuation in his book that the Jews might have had a hand in writing the Koran, as if that is controversial. If you look at the Koran it is just plagiarism of both Christian and Jewish texts, with a few additions, deletions, and distortions. As far as I am concerned Muhammad was the most famous plagiarist in history

  • Deepak Chopra is writing a "fictional" account of Muhammad. Isn't writing a fictional account of Muhammad redundant? I mean the Koran, much like the Bible, takes historical characters and embellishes their biographies in a mythic way. It seems like all Chopra is doing is reinventing the imaginary wheel.

  • This time I'm kind of hoping for a fatwa...

  • @r22k10 Same, lol. If there's anybody who should be done away with by radical muslims....can't it be him? Spare Ayan Hirsi Ali, and take Chopra, please..lol

  • @r22k10 Elaborate?

  • I dont' want to spam, but I host a video called "Deepak Chopra Phrase Generator" and I'm trying to get it posted as a video response. I think the atheist viewers may enjoy it :)

  • fuckin' media whore - wish this guy would dry up and blow away

  • Sure would like to break my foot off in Deepak Chopra's ass.

    The Quran is not real nut-job, just like any holy book.

  • One of the worst peddlars of woo-woo out there. This is another form of self promotion, I think he's trying to corner the market on Islamic morons he can milk.

  • @disrxt Deepak Chopra:

    "Lets see, I've made money off of christians, new age retards, and those who are curious but ignorant about quantum physics....howabout I make some money off of dumb muslims now? Yeah that sounds goooood"

  • Choke-raw puke again

  • Deepak Chopra is a quak.

  • If muslims give importance to Chopra they are stupid... because Chopra its a ass brain!

  • Chopra has a firm place on my personal list of crazy people but I would lie if I said I wasn't a bit intrigued. Curious what comes of this.

  • The interviewer meant "unbeliever" as in non-Muslim. It's actually impossible to say whether Chopra is religious or not; he's just a poser who is where the money is.

  • I think Deepak needs self help.

  • idiot