what have wimyn been liberated from in the First world a world that was created by men !
medicine engineering art military skilla naval air craft design and piloting
wimyn's liberation is cant on wheels and currently they are riding on the backs of men like the limpids they are - freeloaders and rop of artists aka the Family Court
I believe it would be wise for women to understand that as their choices directly affect men, family and society they should pay attention to the voices of men and the growing Men's Rights Movement. Please google rebuking feminism for my blogspot on this subject and the subjective experience of a man in our culture.
Liberation for women means "choice" to do whatever they want and as much, choices that not only men don't have but are forced to support. Women have no obligation in courtship marriage and divorce. Women also have no social obligation to society. If one is independent it also means one can not be depended on. Men have no choices and all the risk and obligation in conception, courtship, marriage, divorce.
It is usually dangerous to interpret clear laws of nature. Simply by observation we can see what IS natural for every man or woman. Women are by nature more emotional, have weaker mind, prone to disorder. A man has a stronger mind by nature, able to sustain hard work even under heavy duress. Naturally, a man can take care of more than just one human. A woman cannot take care even of herself, naturally speaking. It is in her interest to be dependent on an a man. It is all in the nature...
But being dependent of a man does not put her in a better or worse position. It is simply the nature of woman's body and mind. Any woman would feel much more fulfilled having children and being taken care of by a man, or men in general, and respected as a child giving human being, that needs protection, care and love. There are societies that protect women and at the same time gives them the superior role. In the ancient vedic culture, a woman is more respected than a man, but still protected.
Women today think they are free, but they are actually being exploited by men. She might think she's free to dress, and behave freely and in any way she wants, then a man comes along, says a few nice words (lying), and due to womans good hearted nature, she believes and becomes pregnant. A man then leaves because she's free and he's not obliged by the state to sick around. Freedom is a power that comes with a load of responsibility. How can a woman be alone if she cannot take care of a child?
"Since every child bearing woman needs a man for protection and maintenance, she's cannot be free."
This is not true. If a pregnant woman is in ill health, then she will have a difficult pregnancy and she will experience debilitating symptoms. Only if this is the case will she then need someone to rely on for assistance.
That being said, if she is a healthy woman, as long as she remains healthy and as long as she was already capable of caring for herself before she became pregnant, then a pregnant woman will remain perfectly capable of caring for herself while she is pregnant. She will be able to physically function just fine, although admittedly with an increasing degree of awkwardness of movement.
Pregnancy is not an illness. It does not weaken the body. This is a common misconception among many men and woman. It is an ignorant belief. In fact, the more a healthy pregant woman treats herself as if she were an invalid and the more that she inhibits her activities accordingly, the worse she will cause her health to become, and the more likely it will become that the child's birth will be difficult.
Beside, you are talking as if we are not living in a modern age where hunting and farming are unnecessary. Even if these things were still necessary, a woman really wouldn't have to hunt in order to survive.Nevertheless, she could do so anyway. She could set traps for small game like rabbits and squirrels, or she could fish. Fish is a perfectly decent source of protein. She could also gather eggs.
And then there are always fruits, legumes, and vegetables. A garden small enough to sustain her own dietary needs could certainly be managed by any pregnant woman. Furthermore, you neglected to consider the fact that a pregnant woman may be cared for by other women. A man is not a physical necessity, but he can be a most pleasant luxury. :) Or not. :(
As for what occurs during the actual birth itself, other women may assist in this, as well. In fact, historically speaking, most oftentimes women have assisted with childbirth. Furthermore, you also neglected to consider that not all men are CAPABLE of being a competent aid and provider. Some men are not good at hunting. Some men are physically weak and sickly. Some men are intellectually incompetent. Some men are psychologically ill.
To suggest that men ARE anything is to disregard the reality of individual differences of weakness and strengths amongst them.Also, your argument about whether or not women were able to survive on their own was entirely contingent upon the consideration of her condition during pregnancy.
In suggesting that women are naturally less able to survive, you spoke of the temporary condition of pregnancy as though it were a life-long condition. Women are not always pregnant.Your argument gave nothing to support any suggestion that if a woman does not become pregnant then she would still be unable to survive without a man.
As for the subject of raising children, the fact is that there ARE plenty of women who do raise children on their own, so obviously your statement that it cannot be done is entirely incorrect. Furthermore, the fact that these women can and do raise children on their own, shows that it also stands to reason that they must be perfectly capable of surviving on their own without a man. Besides, not every woman is able to bear children.
The reality of the matter is that there are many women living in the world today who are entirely self-sufficient, and so they obviously do not need a man.
The fundamental problems with your argument are that you made broad generalizations about men and women, as if all men were the same as all other men, and as if all women were the same as all other women, and that you based your argument around the occurrence of one set of circumstance in a very outdated kind of society.
What you wrote is just sexist rhetoric and not the absolute truth. If you believe these sexist generalizations, it is the same as believing racist generalizations. Judging by physical characteristics is not an accurate way to find the truth about any person's actual personal tendencies, strengths, and weakness.
You should not accept belief in generalizations, as it is an ignorant practice. In this case, it keeps you from knowing what is the absolute truth, regarding the real individual differences between specific men and women. In the greater sense, it keeps you from knowing that, in reality, we each do have our own unique set of physical, psychological, and intellectual strengths and weaknesses.
Friends of mine travel to the West Papua jungle for a month each year. The videos they've shown me have really surprised me. But this is not poverty. They have plenty of food and water. The women also hunt. In fact I've seen more videos of women working hard than men. Look for Best Papua Tours to see what I'm talking about.
A good woman is worth more than rubies and fine gold.
The only thing woman's liberation did was to liberate them from reality.
Remember it was woman and children first. Titanic anybody? Women were clothed by their husbands, fed, houses built over their heads, every need provided for. And men used to go to jail for their wives crimes.
Women have been liberated into despotic socialism. Forced association, and forced equal outcomes, hence unnatural.
I think you'll find that a surprisingly large percentage of the women people alive today (and indeed men & children) are need to hunt, set traps for small game etc etc...
I say this because your comment gives me the impression hat you think no human does those things anymore.
Thank you for the input. I am sure that you are correct. I did not mean to suggest that people do not still live in societies where they hunt, etc. for survival. The position from which I was considering the matter was centered around the fact that it is possible for all people to live without having to hunt, provided - of course- that they were to move into a more (so-called) "civilized" area of the world.
What I meant was that whether or not women do rely on men for survival, the presumption that it is necessary for them to do so is an incorrect presumption.
women are so much fun my wife does the boxing in her knickers with other women fighters its sexy and also i get her to do the housework in her knickers tights and heels its good fun
If a woman is truly free like a man is, she'd be able to bear a child and take care of it on her own. A man can live on his own, work on a land and survive. A woman cannot be alone, even if she's strong enough to work on the land and hunt for food, as soon as she becomes pregnant, she is rendered helpless and threatened by death of her child or and herself. That cannot be truly called freedom. Since every child bearing woman needs a man for protection and maintenance, she's cannot be free.
a real woman with a brain and self esteem doesnt feel the need to act like a whore or dress like one, too bad there are so many shitty fathers out there who failed to make their daughters feel loved and worthy of respect. its so sad seeing all these nasty girls with no self respect...short skirts with high heels at school and tits falling out everywhere... =/
Here is the probelm with your comment: If you are are presuming to define how a woman should and should not dress, and how she should and should not behave, you are not advocating that she should be liberated, you are suggesting that she should be oppressed under your opinion of how she should dress and behave.
If a woman feels the NEED to act and dress like a whore to get "love" from men its not right I believe. If one WANTS to dress like one for fun i never said that was wrong. ^_^ im talking about attitude and self-esteem issues. I'm talking about how a woman puts her self-worth in clothing and not personality. It's a very serious issue for young girls due to the media and magazine as well as fashion.
"I'm talking about how a woman puts her self-worth in clothing and not personality."
The same could rightly be said of those women who wear the hijab and believe that it says something about their self-worth and their personality - or who see other women wearing the hijab and assume that it says anything about that woman's self-worth and personality - or who see a non-Muslim woman 'dressing like a whore' and presume that says something about her self-worth or personality.
You see, certain Muslim women do also suffer a delusion about appearance and clothing being an indicator of the internal nature of a woman.
My self-worth and personality have nothing to do with how I dress or do not dress. These things do not differ with the addition, change, or subtraction of any particular article or articles of clothing, nor do they differ with any total lack thereof.
Uh, where did you get the impression that I said or even implied that you presumed anything? It seens that you have presumed that I did suggest such a thing about you.
Thanks a ton :) Really empowering !
Enelyna 9 months ago
Women today, with their sense of entitlement, promiscuous sluts who scream rape when caught casually fucking in the bathroom...
ManofManyPasswords 9 months ago
Liberation today would be our little boys in chains
Do any of these extreme feminists have children? I feel sorry for their boys
GuysSeriously 1 year ago
what have wimyn been liberated from in the First world a world that was created by men !
medicine engineering art military skilla naval air craft design and piloting
wimyn's liberation is cant on wheels and currently they are riding on the backs of men like the limpids they are - freeloaders and rop of artists aka the Family Court
shazam20007 1 year ago
They reckon that Beer contains female hormones and I think they are right.
After 8 pints I talk shit and can't drive!
---
MRMILO57 1 year ago
Very good clip. I'm gonna post it on my myspace.
Divinity33372 2 years ago
Go back 2 kitchen
kittyownd 2 years ago
I believe it would be wise for women to understand that as their choices directly affect men, family and society they should pay attention to the voices of men and the growing Men's Rights Movement. Please google rebuking feminism for my blogspot on this subject and the subjective experience of a man in our culture.
Red0660 2 years ago
Liberation for women means "choice" to do whatever they want and as much, choices that not only men don't have but are forced to support. Women have no obligation in courtship marriage and divorce. Women also have no social obligation to society. If one is independent it also means one can not be depended on. Men have no choices and all the risk and obligation in conception, courtship, marriage, divorce.
Red0660 2 years ago
Google white slavery. Whites have been enslaved for 1000's of years. Black slavery is used as class warfare, for supposed gains in affirmative action.
Forced association is against the constitution.
Verlch 3 years ago
Enlightenment? What is this witchcraft?
Verlch 3 years ago
I find the subjection of women our greatest crime against humainty.
PowerAndPerception 3 years ago
It is usually dangerous to interpret clear laws of nature. Simply by observation we can see what IS natural for every man or woman. Women are by nature more emotional, have weaker mind, prone to disorder. A man has a stronger mind by nature, able to sustain hard work even under heavy duress. Naturally, a man can take care of more than just one human. A woman cannot take care even of herself, naturally speaking. It is in her interest to be dependent on an a man. It is all in the nature...
kakudmi 3 years ago
But being dependent of a man does not put her in a better or worse position. It is simply the nature of woman's body and mind. Any woman would feel much more fulfilled having children and being taken care of by a man, or men in general, and respected as a child giving human being, that needs protection, care and love. There are societies that protect women and at the same time gives them the superior role. In the ancient vedic culture, a woman is more respected than a man, but still protected.
kakudmi 3 years ago
Women today think they are free, but they are actually being exploited by men. She might think she's free to dress, and behave freely and in any way she wants, then a man comes along, says a few nice words (lying), and due to womans good hearted nature, she believes and becomes pregnant. A man then leaves because she's free and he's not obliged by the state to sick around. Freedom is a power that comes with a load of responsibility. How can a woman be alone if she cannot take care of a child?
kakudmi 3 years ago
"Since every child bearing woman needs a man for protection and maintenance, she's cannot be free."
This is not true. If a pregnant woman is in ill health, then she will have a difficult pregnancy and she will experience debilitating symptoms. Only if this is the case will she then need someone to rely on for assistance.
MENCADO 3 years ago
That being said, if she is a healthy woman, as long as she remains healthy and as long as she was already capable of caring for herself before she became pregnant, then a pregnant woman will remain perfectly capable of caring for herself while she is pregnant. She will be able to physically function just fine, although admittedly with an increasing degree of awkwardness of movement.
MENCADO 3 years ago
Pregnancy is not an illness. It does not weaken the body. This is a common misconception among many men and woman. It is an ignorant belief. In fact, the more a healthy pregant woman treats herself as if she were an invalid and the more that she inhibits her activities accordingly, the worse she will cause her health to become, and the more likely it will become that the child's birth will be difficult.
MENCADO 3 years ago
Beside, you are talking as if we are not living in a modern age where hunting and farming are unnecessary. Even if these things were still necessary, a woman really wouldn't have to hunt in order to survive.Nevertheless, she could do so anyway. She could set traps for small game like rabbits and squirrels, or she could fish. Fish is a perfectly decent source of protein. She could also gather eggs.
MENCADO 3 years ago
And then there are always fruits, legumes, and vegetables. A garden small enough to sustain her own dietary needs could certainly be managed by any pregnant woman. Furthermore, you neglected to consider the fact that a pregnant woman may be cared for by other women. A man is not a physical necessity, but he can be a most pleasant luxury. :) Or not. :(
MENCADO 3 years ago
As for what occurs during the actual birth itself, other women may assist in this, as well. In fact, historically speaking, most oftentimes women have assisted with childbirth. Furthermore, you also neglected to consider that not all men are CAPABLE of being a competent aid and provider. Some men are not good at hunting. Some men are physically weak and sickly. Some men are intellectually incompetent. Some men are psychologically ill.
MENCADO 3 years ago
To suggest that men ARE anything is to disregard the reality of individual differences of weakness and strengths amongst them.Also, your argument about whether or not women were able to survive on their own was entirely contingent upon the consideration of her condition during pregnancy.
MENCADO 3 years ago
In suggesting that women are naturally less able to survive, you spoke of the temporary condition of pregnancy as though it were a life-long condition. Women are not always pregnant.Your argument gave nothing to support any suggestion that if a woman does not become pregnant then she would still be unable to survive without a man.
MENCADO 3 years ago
As for the subject of raising children, the fact is that there ARE plenty of women who do raise children on their own, so obviously your statement that it cannot be done is entirely incorrect. Furthermore, the fact that these women can and do raise children on their own, shows that it also stands to reason that they must be perfectly capable of surviving on their own without a man. Besides, not every woman is able to bear children.
MENCADO 3 years ago
The reality of the matter is that there are many women living in the world today who are entirely self-sufficient, and so they obviously do not need a man.
MENCADO 3 years ago
The fundamental problems with your argument are that you made broad generalizations about men and women, as if all men were the same as all other men, and as if all women were the same as all other women, and that you based your argument around the occurrence of one set of circumstance in a very outdated kind of society.
MENCADO 3 years ago
What you wrote is just sexist rhetoric and not the absolute truth. If you believe these sexist generalizations, it is the same as believing racist generalizations. Judging by physical characteristics is not an accurate way to find the truth about any person's actual personal tendencies, strengths, and weakness.
MENCADO 3 years ago
You should not accept belief in generalizations, as it is an ignorant practice. In this case, it keeps you from knowing what is the absolute truth, regarding the real individual differences between specific men and women. In the greater sense, it keeps you from knowing that, in reality, we each do have our own unique set of physical, psychological, and intellectual strengths and weaknesses.
MENCADO 3 years ago
Friends of mine travel to the West Papua jungle for a month each year. The videos they've shown me have really surprised me. But this is not poverty. They have plenty of food and water. The women also hunt. In fact I've seen more videos of women working hard than men. Look for Best Papua Tours to see what I'm talking about.
PowerAndPerception 3 years ago
A good woman is worth more than rubies and fine gold.
The only thing woman's liberation did was to liberate them from reality.
Remember it was woman and children first. Titanic anybody? Women were clothed by their husbands, fed, houses built over their heads, every need provided for. And men used to go to jail for their wives crimes.
Women have been liberated into despotic socialism. Forced association, and forced equal outcomes, hence unnatural.
Verlch 3 years ago
I think you'll find that a surprisingly large percentage of the women people alive today (and indeed men & children) are need to hunt, set traps for small game etc etc...
I say this because your comment gives me the impression hat you think no human does those things anymore.
PowerAndPerception 3 years ago
Thank you for the input. I am sure that you are correct. I did not mean to suggest that people do not still live in societies where they hunt, etc. for survival. The position from which I was considering the matter was centered around the fact that it is possible for all people to live without having to hunt, provided - of course- that they were to move into a more (so-called) "civilized" area of the world.
MENCADO 3 years ago
What I meant was that whether or not women do rely on men for survival, the presumption that it is necessary for them to do so is an incorrect presumption.
MENCADO 3 years ago 2
women are so much fun my wife does the boxing in her knickers with other women fighters its sexy and also i get her to do the housework in her knickers tights and heels its good fun
lyndono72 3 years ago
If a woman is truly free like a man is, she'd be able to bear a child and take care of it on her own. A man can live on his own, work on a land and survive. A woman cannot be alone, even if she's strong enough to work on the land and hunt for food, as soon as she becomes pregnant, she is rendered helpless and threatened by death of her child or and herself. That cannot be truly called freedom. Since every child bearing woman needs a man for protection and maintenance, she's cannot be free.
kakudmi 3 years ago
Sin355 I agree with you so much..continue to speak the truth
lexhotone718 4 years ago
a real woman with a brain and self esteem doesnt feel the need to act like a whore or dress like one, too bad there are so many shitty fathers out there who failed to make their daughters feel loved and worthy of respect. its so sad seeing all these nasty girls with no self respect...short skirts with high heels at school and tits falling out everywhere... =/
Sin355 4 years ago
dizamn what city you from?
riosstyles 4 years ago
silent hill
Sin355 4 years ago
Here is the probelm with your comment: If you are are presuming to define how a woman should and should not dress, and how she should and should not behave, you are not advocating that she should be liberated, you are suggesting that she should be oppressed under your opinion of how she should dress and behave.
MENCADO 3 years ago
If a woman feels the NEED to act and dress like a whore to get "love" from men its not right I believe. If one WANTS to dress like one for fun i never said that was wrong. ^_^ im talking about attitude and self-esteem issues. I'm talking about how a woman puts her self-worth in clothing and not personality. It's a very serious issue for young girls due to the media and magazine as well as fashion.
Sin355 3 years ago
"I'm talking about how a woman puts her self-worth in clothing and not personality."
The same could rightly be said of those women who wear the hijab and believe that it says something about their self-worth and their personality - or who see other women wearing the hijab and assume that it says anything about that woman's self-worth and personality - or who see a non-Muslim woman 'dressing like a whore' and presume that says something about her self-worth or personality.
MENCADO 3 years ago
You see, certain Muslim women do also suffer a delusion about appearance and clothing being an indicator of the internal nature of a woman.
My self-worth and personality have nothing to do with how I dress or do not dress. These things do not differ with the addition, change, or subtraction of any particular article or articles of clothing, nor do they differ with any total lack thereof.
MENCADO 3 years ago
you dont understand what im saying at all. i agree that a person's clothing should NOT define them.
Sin355 3 years ago
I'm not presuming about anyone, dont see wher you got that impression. Some girls that ive met were exactly what i described. i DONT presume.
Sin355 3 years ago
Uh, where did you get the impression that I said or even implied that you presumed anything? It seens that you have presumed that I did suggest such a thing about you.
MENCADO 3 years ago