Mandelbrot Set Zoom 10E125

[fauxpace]

The preimage of the universe...this is true beauty

[tsunaxakari]

From 0 to 1, we find infinite.

[LifeIsJustARide85]

You can make this yourself? infinity created by man. What an awsome feeling!

[barginhunter890]

must have missed the day in math when they taught this

[barginhunter890]

must have missed the day in math when they taught this

[barginhunter890]

must have missed the day in math when they taught this

[willdingdong]

Love it - one of the best I've seen

[purplefurball]

wonderfull stuff!!

[philipkduck]

Great vid, and good music. Who is the music by?

[TheYtml]

the song reminds me of the city in the sky dungeon from loz twilight princess

hypnotic, btw

[DisengagementRules]

WHAT DO YOU

DEMAND OF

ME, MASTER?!

[BRUMARTUBE]

I <3 all Mandelbrot zooms, but this one remains among my favorite.

[Grant691]

*Brains explodes*

You can't handle the singularity!

[CursedExistence]

this is the best mandelbrot set vid ive ever seen. the music is really fitting as well...yet oddly familiar..sounds like one of those binaural beat things

[Qubisten]

yes!!

[chockfish]

In the end a fractal is realy a huge nothing!

[jnoort]

Beautiful! I like how it ends with a little baby mandelbrot :).

[julesdogg]

This needs to be in HD

[SoupIsMoney]

That would take multiple lifetimes to render.

[ratchetclan3]

wasnt the white at the end, the end of mandelbrot?

[tommyk77]

No, because that final mandelbrot is just like the one at the start. It's edges are comprised of spirals and more mandelbrots

[julesdogg]

End?, There isn't an 'end'!

[marc80s]

@ratchetclan3 Sort of. Not really...but I see the 10x-115th power level as about as final an "end" to the Mandelbrot set as there is. No point in actually going further, really. Call it the end and be done.

[naglma]

This is without a doubt the best (semi-)undecorated mandelbrot zoom I've ever seen. I've built my own engine and know what kind of number crunching is involved - and programming effort.

I assume the skips are where some sort of renormalization takes place.

As a benchmark, I'd like to know how many cpu hours (days) it took to generate the frames???

[naglma]

BTW, the lighting effect near the beginning  middle of the zoom totally cracked me up. Nice :)

[SpellboundSolution]

@naglma Apparently it took a month. I'm jealous somebody can go so deep in such a short period of time!

[b8mb8]

best zoom ever lol.

[zoom98]

An excellent video. Deep scans require higher resolution (AND ENCODING) though, and your coloring scheme probably didn't help the contrast any. But hey, done in one month! That's not bad at all!

[9H0A0L0]

Good work, but try posting it with more quality!

[Nexzrax]

Impossible x) thats what i have to say about that x) To Advanced math to me xD

[allysmarty101]

er okay.... that was really cool but im trying to find a video on what it IS! but i cant find anything EXPLAINING it so if you know of a video or website send me a message or reply to this comment

[maceface2]

This is the mandelbrot set, which is a fractal. A fractal is something (I'm no expert) that contains elements of itself infinetly. The mandelbrot set is based on a very basic mathematical formula and the key thing about this formula is that instead of an equals sign there is an iteration. This means that when a number is put in, instead of the equation working itself out, the answer on one side forms the input for the other and the data escalates. This is a visualisation of that, colour

[julesdogg]

the fomula must include the complex number "i".

zn+1 = zn2 + c

E.g. where i is defined as i² = -1

[maceface2]

being determined by how quickly that equation turns to zero or infinity given a certain number.

[mjtanner]

No.

1. I think I could detect some splicing.

2. I think you could spend an eternity finding the kind of close similarity across such an large scale that you have here.

3. It would take many months of crunching on a high end machine. Who would pay for it?

Sorry, I'm skeptical.

[Malicorian]

if the universe is like this, physicist will be quite frustrated, as it goes ALL the way down lol

[BRUMARTUBE]

They may enjoy the nice and short unifying principle. The M set definition is not much longer than the definition of the circle.

[todayisthedaytolive]

That was absurd!!!!

[Defenestratum]

Awesome. I still don't get how the mandelbrot set works, but it's totally amazing.

[edwardmirza]

You don't have this in higher resolution do you?

[DancingMath]

Best Mandel zoom I have ever seen. 5 Stars.

[BRUMARTUBE]

So we could be close. Just that I think that immateral things like numbers and their complex relations are more primitive than physical reality. Plato and Plotinus could still be more correct than Aristotle. I am open to notion of universal self or consciousness, emerging from the numbers and generating collective and less collective dreams. The M set has been shown undecidable. If it is shown creative (in the sense of Post), then it is *home* :)

A compact picture of the multiverse.

[Sclorched]

This is my favorite zoom ive seen yet. I love all the spirals at the beginning.

[BTC141]

Reminds me of the geometric patterns I've seen on Acid and 'shrooms. The similarity is amazing. Thanks for the fractals.

[nickcarveth]

me too man wow gotta love the halluciongens

[BTC141]

Yup, I concur.

[titadoy]

i cant believ there is a small madelbrot

shape at 0:55!

[Oliverrr69]

incredible

[frankbuss]

Nice. How many iterations did you use per point? I guess it depends on the zoom factor? BTW: I've done a small zoom in ASCII.

[ahmann13]

awesome!! The best zoom I have ever seen!!

[79siggy]

Wow that was awesome. Did it actually end like that or could it have gone on longer? I can't believe those beams of light that broke into 2 and later they broke into 4 then 8 (I think!) amazing and very beautiful

[phvalue323]

Its enlessly complex, in otherwords it will not only go on forever, but it will continue to become more and more complicated as you progress through the zoom. Its like matter and the progression of time. This is chaos theory in a geometric figure, and displays alot of the tendencies of physical reality, which is why leavs look like it, and why our bodies are made of trillions of cells, made of trillions of mollecules, made up of trillions of atoms. The numbers may be wrong but you get it.

[DarkHorse2083]

look at the universe. just as you imply, it is a fractal. quantum physics is on, shall we say our limit of resolution: in both directions; neither do we really know what quantum energy is, nor do we know how our universe operates on, what is now, eleven dimensions? There is more in heaven and Earth Horatio . . .

[phvalue323]

Yes, reality is mandelbrot in principal nature, and therefore evolution is beyond the scope of life, both infinitely and infinitesimally. Our way of seeing things is far off. Materialism is far off. Even thoughts, lives, the ocean of movies, all of them are fractal in nature, so this goes beyond physical properties, presumably because these things are founded in the realm of the physical. However, notice that at the core of each big picture repetition, there is emptiness inside complexity.

[WarBird015]

That's Bullshit"It's only a big joke the whole thing, stupid!

[1SikBR]

This is one of the more impressive zooms I've seen.

[Cimbolic]

Deep, deep, deep. Excellent how much depth you got. Really great work (and patience!).

Thanks!

[BRUMARTUBE]

My favorite zoom on the border of a creative set.

[mike4ty4]

"i agree bobfresco. "

Actually I wouldn't. How would it _dis_prove God, anyway?

"True Divinity Transcends all Form. it is all Forms, and it is not any one Form. too say any one form is the Ultimate Divine would be dangerous. "

This is right. God is *unknowable* essence. So His/Her/Its form is unknowable to us, and indeed to any limited, non-God entity.

Not only would it be "dangerous", to substitute Idols in place of God would be tantamount to blasphemy.

[babyaiko]

this is like our universe =d our universe is inside another universe ... so on =D

[DaveODrisc]

Cool!

[Orenotter]

Sugakane, your first comment sounded like you were completely stoned. How did you expect anyone to respond?

I disagree that we all reflect the truth. I've spent a good part of this week mired in such stupidities as evolution, holocaust denial, flat earth theory and moon landing denial. Sorry, Kane. The human race has a long way to go before it reflects truth as anything but a blur.

But here's a suggestion... why don't we just enjoy the film? It's a lovely zoom, after all.

[phvalue323]

Orenotter, You sound functionally retarded. Let me guess, you drank the punch. We dont need any of your media mumbo jumbo okay, its just silly to repeat everything you hear from the news, and whatever else the uninteligent convention and mainstream has conjured up. Of course we are like mirrors, like a video camera is a recourder, we too are recourders, and therefore mirrors are comparable. Dull minds are incapable of realize that reality itself is what ancient men called "god"... "god" IS what

[alreadytaken4536]

What if someone found the universe inside a mandelbrot set....

[Orenotter]

It'd be a tight fit, seeing as how the M-set is 2-dimensional.

[djancak]

a 2 dimensional object can easily represent a 3 dimensional one. just think of it as a shadow of the higher dimension

[Orenotter]

No it doesn't. Don't be stupid.

[Orenotter]

Bear in mind, Bobfresco, that though the algorithm is simple, nothing could come of it until Mandelbrot discovered it, a computer translated it and Phaumann posted it. The set itself is uncreated, as it is a result of the laws of math, but the images you see are the result of intelligent design.

[phvalue323]

god is infinite right? REality is infinite right? What conclusion can we make, if this equation and diagram show a principle of matter and matters complexity is infinite? This thing is endless, not just infinite, but endless. REality is endless, "god" is endless...god is reality, fuck, its so obvious and way more profound than some guy that knows and made all! Retards. This is what ancient people origionally believed. I mean fuck sake, all you have to do is look up at the night sky to see it!

[Orenotter]

Your argument is riddled with logical fallacies. By your argument, I could say that the value of pi equals a sierpinski triangle because both are endless. You also need to fortify your argument with swearing, personal attacks, trumped up accusations and inconsiderate behavior. You're just hurting yourself. Now please be quiet and let us enjoy this video that Phaumann was kind enough to give us. Show our host a little respect, man.

[phvalue323]

The difference is that one of them is an equation and the other is reality. I want to clarify something also, I dont think that God is a personality, just like I, it's not a deity, but a process. The process of Time. The universe of matter vs the universe of space is an other dynamic, and that other dynamic is also called reality. I see this as a divine thing, sacred, as I see the complexity of life as a beautiful thing. The Process of time vs the endless nothing is what I call god/ Everything.

[Orenotter]

How would you like it if someone referred to you as a process? You are wrong in your statement. It's not a matter of perspective or philosophy or belief. You're just plain wrong.

[phvalue323]

What is your deffinition of process? I can hardly see how you could disagree, seeing as how it took you processing my previous comment, and this one, and the room you are in, and today, and all of yesterday, to be able to comment back. Everything is a happening, and that happening is a procession. I am a developing, and I am a part of the overall developing of time. My god is the big picture, including every nuance and the unknown of reality. Fundimentally, we say the same thing.

[BRUMARTUBE]

God, a process or a person? It is an open problem for me. If it is solved, let me know the reference. Process could be dreamed by a universal person sleeping through the relation of numbers. Physical reality could be the internal appearance of something vastly bigger like Plato thought. I think we need that if we don't want to eliminate person, be it divine or terrestrial.

[phvalue323]

As far as god as a person, it really depends on your definition of person. I dont believe that there is a self; to me, that is a construct, and the origion of "I" is consciousness itself--a subjective, imaterial. The person, therefore, is the result of the subjective. Without the consciousness, we are not husks, but the intelligence is not "I", just as much as what I get from a book, is not myself. Person means mask. Learning where "I" comes from is comming closer to truth/god/divine/reality.

[Orenotter]

PS

I will not argue with you in Phaumann's feedback area. If you want to be a jackass to me, you come talk to me. I will not respond to you here again.

[Orenotter]

Suga, I'd think you were smoking something if it weren't for the fact that I can see all of those things in here. Very interesting phrasing you have there.

[znephf]

So very cool! Thank you.

[UberMari0]

Well, that's gotta be the best mandelzoom I've ever seen.

[Orenotter]

I just have to keep coming back to this one. It is tied with the Dizzy Mix for my favorite zoom.

[crash6871]

deep $#!+ man.

[Orenotter]

Un. Believable.

That is one deep zoom.

By the way, don't click my username.

[Vokio]

to infinity and beyond!

[ssgwnbtd]

I CAN SEE FOREVER