first off you can't talk shit on the ford you hooked it to a truck with more weight and a bigger engine and its older than the jeep.second of all the jeep has All Wheel Drive and the Ranger has Four Wheel Drive major difference cause the jeep thinks and puts power to the wheels with traction and the ranger has two differentials witch spins witch ever wheel spins easiest
@mfowler15 The jeep isnt "All Wheel Drive" The jeep is full time 4wd. There is a difference. And the jeep works in the same way as the ranger. It will spin whichever tire is easier. it is an open diff just like ranger. The only difference is the jeep having quadratrac...but you prlly have no clue what that is so i'll explain..The jeep is in 2wd untill the front tires arent rotatating at the same speed as the rear tires. It isnt always putting power to all 4 tires.
@712buzz First off I've live around vehicles all my life I know how the Jeep works and that quadratrac shit is there to think about what wheel has the most grip and apply it and the jeep stil has an advantage cause it has more wieght to give it more traction anyway now you tie the ranger to a Jeep comanchee and it will pull it no problem
The two Rangers I've owned have NEVER left me stranded somewhere. A 1989 Buick LeSabre has (camshaft position sensor and blown CV joint, so that's two times), a 2006 GMC Sierra has (tranny), a 1995 Ford Aerostar has (tranny), and that's all I can recall at the moment. So that's three GM products and one Ford. I've owned eleven cars in a whole five years. I am undoubtedly hard on my cars and trucks and only one Ford has ever let me down. The rest were GM or foreign made.
this was not even a good pull, its a 5spd ranger vs a auto jeep, the ranger had the clutch in when he was getting pulled.... id put either of my rangers vs a jeep any day
hahah i love all the hate cvomments against fords but the ranger has a smaller engine (well this model does) than the jepp so really stop hating it is kinnda sad and fors kicks chevy's but
Hahaha fords are horrible in general and manufactured crappy. their brakes suck and their gas pedals are hard as a clutch to press down. I had a jeep and traded it for a f 150. Lessoned learned never buy a ford again. Jeeps until the day i die!!!
@Caropanthers90 it's hard to press the gas for you cause you're a pussy and you traded for the ford not bought it you stupid ass motherfucking bitch ass nigga cunt sucking dick gargling bitch
@96StangGT91 hahaha people like you make me laugh. fords belong in junk yards. ford: fix or repair daily. thats why the paint on fords crack when it drops below 45 degrees and the gas pedals aren't smooth and have to be replaced constantly cause their manufacturing sucks. a jeep would out wheel a ford any day of the week. a dodge would out wheel a ford, so will a chevy. ill even go non american, a nissan titan would run over a ford anytime anywhere
To any and all who say that Ford is better than GM or Chrysler have never worked on any of them. As a certified mechanic, I have had my share of experience and dread the sight of any Fords at our shop
@TroySh90 - Im the opposite. I dread GM and Chrysler's coming in... I've worked on all of them. The only thing Chrysler has going for them is there AWD Ram, GM fell behind Ford in reliability.
@TroySh90 finaly someone who understands why ford sucks. not because of performance, but because people doin stupid shitl ike this tears stuff up and its a bitch to fix on a ford
@TroySh90 Agreed, i'm not a mechanic, but i've worked on a ford before and it was hell... complete mess of wires, plus instead of keeping it simple and have a hub, bearing, rotor, etc. like a normal truck, they make this big messed up part that is all in one that costs more than a clutch for most vehicles.
I have no bias but am an American car lover and an MBA student: Ford stayed afloat because 1) they reacted more quickly to changes in the market and 2) they had more valuable brands in assets to sell off. They make better cars then GM or Chrystler anyway, sales, reviews, and ratings speak. read a magazine.
2.9 losing to a 4.0? is anyone suprised? get a 4.0 ranger fx4 in there boys!
You clearly have no knowledge of cars or trucks watsoever. Its not a matter of me liking jeep at all, ITS ALL NUMBERS! a ranger has nothing compared to a Jeep. Seriously get your fanboy dreams out of your ass
@iwillfish4life If you've modded it then I understand. But the Wrangler is so well built they face it off against larger trucks and it holds its ground or wins.
nice engine in that jeep, BUT i would still take the ranger any day over that jeep. how much do you want to bet that the jeep will get stuck before the ranger in the back woods?
Seriously? A ranger vs a ZJ offroad? That's not even a competition. ZJ = more power, more articulation, better entry/exit/breakover angles, better weight distribution. Seriously you need to go wheeling in some Jeeps, it might change your opinion on things.
i go wheeling in jeeps all the time. trust me, i go wheeling a LOT more than the average person. the reason i would rather the ranger is because it WILL last longer. meaning you can push it harder, and over time get the same as the jeep. plus, it's a truck and i can haul around my dirt bike and tow a trailer better. but hey, that's what my F-250's for. i've got more power than both of those things combined.
I see your point on having a bed to haul your bike, but my 5.2 zj with minor tuning can tow 7,000lbs at 75-90 mph all day! I can run mustang GT's up to a hundred!
really depends on the trail, but the ranger will excel in most trails because it's lighter, and won't bog down. if there's something where you need weight you can just throw something in the bed.
at :38 the front tires on the ranger are spinning. Plus, the guy told the driver in the ranger to put it in 4 lo. Who else would he be talking to? The jeep's windows weren't open... of course it wasn't a fair match, but who cares.
i hooked up to my dads 01 gmc sierra with a 502 big block he was in 2 wheel drive i was in 4 low he could move me but when he put it in 4 hi he drug me up the hill and any where he wanted
now why the hell is the ranger not in 4wd that just made no since to me. ranger vs a damn good machine and it wasnt in 4 low. i think the ranger would have taken the jeep if it was actually in 4wd
Not a fair competition at all, motor size is enough right there. Should have done 4l to 4l and 4x4 on both and would have been perfect, ranger would have for sure won.
umm,you mean 2.3, the ranger only came in a 2.3l 4 cylnder, 3.0l V6 and a 4.0l V6 that was the same block as the tarus sho minus a few good parts. plus the jeep is a 4x4 while u can tell the ranger is the regular 2x4
Yea, aparently you don't dumbshit. All cherokee's came with a 4.0 liter Inline 6, Grand cherokees either came with the 4.0 Inline 6 or a choice of 2 v8's. Wranglers came with either a 2.8 liter Inline 4 or the 4.0 liter Inline 6. The new liberty was the first newer model to come with a 3.7 liter v6, followed by the rest of the models post 2001. So when you feel like learning something, let me know, til then fuck off unless you do your research you moron.
That Grand Cherokee in the Video is either a 4.0 liter Inline 6, a 5.2 liter v8 or a 5.9 liter v8. THATS IT!!!! Unless they swapped the motor, thats all it could be. I have owned 3 Jeeps and have been working on them for over 7 years. I think I know what I am talking about.
The only time there have ever been v6's in Jeeps was the 225 cubic inch "Dauntless" 1966-1971 CJ which is an old Wrangler and the 1966-1971 Jeepster which is a Wrngler car type thing, the 173 cubic inch 2.8 liter GM 1984-1986 XJ which is the normal smaller Cherokee and the MJ which is the Comanche pick up. They discontinued that motor because it sucked. The last and only other v6 Jeep has EVER made is the 3.7 liter "Power Tech" in the 2002-later KJ which is the Liberty, the 2005-later WK.
The 2005-later WK which is the new Grand Cherokee, the 2006-later XK which is the Commander, and 2007-later Wrangler, Wrangler Unlimited, Rubicon, and Rubicon Unlimited. There are no more v6's in Jeeps history, thats it. When you need another lesson in Jeeps and how FUCKIN STUPID YOU ARE, let know, k bitch?
you fuckin moron you could have googled all that and this all makes you look far more stupid witch btw i thought impossible it almost looks like you copied and pasted this shit you are a dum fuck mainly off of the fact that you dont under stand the weight differential your lanky tank ass jeep is a heavy piece of shit wich is by far worse that you lack that and hands down i would fuck you up physically and mentally
Nope, sorry buddy, got it from the jeep 4x4 handbook. Oh yea, dumb fuck has a B at the end of dumb you dumb fuck. They really aren't heavy, they only come in at about 3800 or less for the cherokee and wrangler. I would love to see you try to hurt me, I'm a welder and I use an anvil and hammer all day, my forearm is probably about as big as your head, not to mention welders get shocked all the time and burned all the time so if I can take that, I think I can take your dumbass mexirap self.
first off your a broke joke secondly you dont have a lyf worth shit if you wait on hear to reply to my messages the same day i sent them third your probably a dum shit talking bitch so stop trying to save chryslers crappy excuse for an offroading peice of borken down shit you are a sad excuse for a human being and i fail you in life and my sound system is worth more than your shitty jeep you fuckin homo
yea, 35 an hour isn't much and I only work 50 or more hours a week, I do only take home 1450 a week. Chrysler stopped making Jeeps in 2001, with the last Cherokee, the new cars are just shit, the Rubicon is the only chance Jeep has anyway. Damn, you must have a nice ass stereo system since I've put over 35,000 in parts into my Jeep. My jeep would fuckin rape you right up the ass, maybe its a homo, I never asked.
what do you drive exactly? Your vid looks like it has a back seat, maybe a van? since you don't like chrysler or mopar, I'm guessin chevy, like a chevy van... maybe even a ford windstar, those are pretty sexy huh? Or an exploder, those are nice.... Oh oh, maybe a civic, like a crx, with a vtech, yea, nothin like a vtech, nothin like runnin some 14's when its maxed out with power. So, enlighten me bro, what do you have thats better than my 11 second lifted Jeep, or the jeep in the vid, or mopar?
my older brother had this jeep and i bought it off him about a 1 and a half ago so lilcretin666 is right and the fords 300 straight 6 is a decent motor but is no match for jeeps 242 4.0 motor and i know personally with this jeep ive hooked to other jeeps and a lifted 86 f-150 with ford straight 6
@hellraiser32492 first off thats an old ass comment to be responding to... BTW i just pulled my neighbors jeep liberty out of the bushes in 4 lo with my I4 banger ranger, then raced him with my ranger sohc LOL! let him go first and still won. All in all Ford is the only company still on its own two feet and all the dodge and chevy fanboys out there should respect that it still out sells them year after year bottom line ford FTW ford GT> viper, corvette. the new 5.0 will show fanboys lol
Wow, you sound like a fanboy yourself. Think about how much branches GM owns compared to Ford, they have much more financial responsibility. Also Ford gets so much money from the government for military and huge companies for super duty trucks and police cars. As for Chrysler, I love Chrysler, and the Wrangler should be respected. Best off road vehicle alive.
@RCPOD first off mind your own fucking buisness secondly ford gets government money for actual work not handouts. GM if you didn't know also gets paid by the government for hummer's(well before they sold it) so who you calling a fanboy?
Mind my own business? you are posting your fanboy thoughts on a youtube comment section. Also sure I have a Suburban but I dont think Chevy is the best because of it, Im for JEEPS. But I love my Suburban more than almost any other car, but you know what? at least Im not jacking off to it like you are to your F150. "ZOMG I OWNz A FORDS TRUX IZ PWNAGE!!!!!" Seriously from what Im hearing in your comments is you are only looking at the name of the car and using that to figure is its
@RCPOD seriously from what im hearing from all your comments is you are imagining me jacking off(????) sorry buddy im not interested in your fetish and i dont really care about what you do and don't like its my own FUCKING opinion so in that sense mind your own business
fuckin idiots nowadays hi on mopar dont understand that toys and rangers are lighter than durangos for the solo purpose of being on mountains watching his bigheaded ass getting stuck in mud, and then they play rock paper scissors to decide who goes and pulls his dumass out gimme a 4.0 ranger and a camper than we'll see whos got more torque
This is one of the most useless truck pull videos ever. Really. Weight has tons to do with traction in this case because you're on a fucking gravel lot. Almost every one of these truck pulls comes down to traction, and usually the loser doesn't have it. Power has little to do with it. Fucktards.
whats with every one saying so much about the jeeps i6? i have one and it sucks alot. it has just over 200k miles on it and it runs like a champ, but its slow as hell and doesnt seem to have very much power. what am i missing?
simple fact....the ford ranger weighs about 1/2 of the cheroke....sorry dude but that cheroke would pull it away even with a smaller moto just because its able to get more traction to the ground....
hey dipshit who said rangers are heavier thats my truck u dumb ass it ways 2550 lbs my cousins jeep ways 6500 plus everything he has in it so before u say rangers are heavier next time read this damn comment turd cake
My 5.9 V-8 grand cherokee weighed in at 4265 with me in it at the race track I was 165lbs. That one weighs about 3900-4000lbs. THe ranger is probably the same. Different weight distribution.
Wow you are bad...4wd vehicles do not take off better, that is why WRXs/Evos use AWD. AWD will perform better on gravel and sand as it senses which tires have traction and keep them from digging holes. IFS work way better in most cases on the streets than a solid axle like a Jeep thats truck companies converted a long time ago to IFS for the most part from Solid axles. How is more traction there with 4WD most are open diffs and therefore only two wheel drive 1 front 1 rear...you are ignorant.
Ha ha. Wow, you calling ME ignorant. HE HE. wow. But anyway, vehicles with a solid rear axle will go faster off the line than vehicles with fully independent suspension.
In my first post, to which you called me ignorant, I was referring to how a 4wd alltime Jeep would beat a 2wd ranger off the line (i had thought this ranger was 2wd). Even if they were both 2wd, a ZJ with the 5.9 is a beast.
On another note, IFS is best for handling purposes and for conservation of funds. Solid axles are expensive for manufacturers. Thats why many of the new jeeps use IFS. IFS also offers more stability (less chance of rollover) but at the expense of articulation.
Ill drag both of you at the same time. The Ranger is not much lighter than a ZJ, ZJs are unibodys and actually quite light. Automobile91 you are backwards, the Rangers make great prerunners and ZJs are much better crawlers.
I am not backwards buddy. A 5.9L ZJ with quadra trac will simply obliderate a Ranger in every performance category. It was the fastest SUV on the market in 1998.
No I was talking strictly about weight Rangers are much heavier than the Jeeps 16 gauge unibodies. Its not about speed in off roading even prerunners the most important piece is their suspensions and LT IFS work better than a solid such as a Jeep. Then a solid axle works better for crawling. You bring me a 5.9ZJ and I will tow that thing all over the place they have lots of power but power isnt everything...Its gearing and traction and my locker and spool work a shitload better than quadratrac
i've owned both and would have to completely disagree with you in all aspects. the jeep is heavier, more power, more torque, more traction... no contest at all. although if you were to race off road, i'd take the ranger in a heartbeat. Very fun to play with.
If you were to race offroad, i'd take the zj. Its all wheel drive system allows it to jump off the line a lot more quickly than the ranger and its power will give it a higher top speed.
a zj is not awd. It is either selectrac part time 4wd or quadratrac full time 4wd. Awd comes on subarus and the like. A ranger is much more nimble off road in the dunes then a zj. The jeep's power is all down low, the ranger has a revvy 4.0L that is MUCH lighter and faster then a zj.
It is all wheel drive with quadra trac, as it can't be disengaged. Technically it is a full-time 4wd system because it has a low range gear... but it is AWD.
4wd vehicles tend to make it off the line faster, as there is more traction there, especially on gravel and sand. And it would depend on the engine of the ranger, and tires and many other factors, but the ZJ is extremely nimble.
@troysh90 i'm a certified bs finder. i don't see anything hard about working on a ford...
spuddud19 2 weeks ago
its called gravel
6Camel6Finger6 2 months ago
u ppl who keep saying that grand cherokees have awd are wrong! they have all time 4wd. there is a difference. get it right!
trevorshellen 8 months ago
if he didnt put it in 4lo he would have burned out his tranny trying to pull the jeep
cecilcountyoutdoors 9 months ago
Yeah this would end differently if the match up was fair, put the jeep with a F-150 and the Jeep wouldnt have a chance
Kolby72 9 months ago
lol, atleast ford man was a good sport about it
oh and suvs seem to always beat pick ups
there are plenty of videos with mid size suvs either tie-ing or beating bigger full size trucks
potna69 9 months ago
lol, atleast ford man was a good sport about it
potna69 9 months ago
i love how the 4.0 just keeps going down the road like its pulling its own weight! classic
ZackXJ 10 months ago
Jeep is just better
Sept0pus 10 months ago
first off you can't talk shit on the ford you hooked it to a truck with more weight and a bigger engine and its older than the jeep.second of all the jeep has All Wheel Drive and the Ranger has Four Wheel Drive major difference cause the jeep thinks and puts power to the wheels with traction and the ranger has two differentials witch spins witch ever wheel spins easiest
mfowler15 11 months ago
@mfowler15 The jeep isnt "All Wheel Drive" The jeep is full time 4wd. There is a difference. And the jeep works in the same way as the ranger. It will spin whichever tire is easier. it is an open diff just like ranger. The only difference is the jeep having quadratrac...but you prlly have no clue what that is so i'll explain..The jeep is in 2wd untill the front tires arent rotatating at the same speed as the rear tires. It isnt always putting power to all 4 tires.
712buzz 10 months ago
@712buzz First off I've live around vehicles all my life I know how the Jeep works and that quadratrac shit is there to think about what wheel has the most grip and apply it and the jeep stil has an advantage cause it has more wieght to give it more traction anyway now you tie the ranger to a Jeep comanchee and it will pull it no problem
mfowler15 9 months ago
The two Rangers I've owned have NEVER left me stranded somewhere. A 1989 Buick LeSabre has (camshaft position sensor and blown CV joint, so that's two times), a 2006 GMC Sierra has (tranny), a 1995 Ford Aerostar has (tranny), and that's all I can recall at the moment. So that's three GM products and one Ford. I've owned eleven cars in a whole five years. I am undoubtedly hard on my cars and trucks and only one Ford has ever let me down. The rest were GM or foreign made.
indyschmidt 1 year ago
its called not comparable jeep is twice as expensive
karmapaintball 1 year ago
that ford is a real drag. hahahah!!!!
kowz4u 1 year ago
this was not even a good pull, its a 5spd ranger vs a auto jeep, the ranger had the clutch in when he was getting pulled.... id put either of my rangers vs a jeep any day
saddivine 1 year ago
hahah i love all the hate cvomments against fords but the ranger has a smaller engine (well this model does) than the jepp so really stop hating it is kinnda sad and fors kicks chevy's but
funkymonkey7373 1 year ago
a bone stock grand cherokee and a weak as ford ranger no one wins
Hallowedpointdtp 1 year ago
i would keep pulling that ranger over the horizon
nxmoparmatt84 1 year ago
@nxmoparmatt84 ...or the wrecking yard LOL
angusandleigh 1 year ago
@angusandleigh lmao
nxmoparmatt84 1 year ago
Just tow that ford to the wrecking yard.
avochristian 1 year ago
Hahaha fords are horrible in general and manufactured crappy. their brakes suck and their gas pedals are hard as a clutch to press down. I had a jeep and traded it for a f 150. Lessoned learned never buy a ford again. Jeeps until the day i die!!!
Caropanthers90 1 year ago
@Caropanthers90 it's hard to press the gas for you cause you're a pussy and you traded for the ford not bought it you stupid ass motherfucking bitch ass nigga cunt sucking dick gargling bitch
96StangGT91 1 year ago
@96StangGT91 hahaha people like you make me laugh. fords belong in junk yards. ford: fix or repair daily. thats why the paint on fords crack when it drops below 45 degrees and the gas pedals aren't smooth and have to be replaced constantly cause their manufacturing sucks. a jeep would out wheel a ford any day of the week. a dodge would out wheel a ford, so will a chevy. ill even go non american, a nissan titan would run over a ford anytime anywhere
Caropanthers90 1 year ago
@96StangGT91 Tell us how you really feel...
indyschmidt 1 year ago
To any and all who say that Ford is better than GM or Chrysler have never worked on any of them. As a certified mechanic, I have had my share of experience and dread the sight of any Fords at our shop
TroySh90 1 year ago 4
@TroySh90 - Im the opposite. I dread GM and Chrysler's coming in... I've worked on all of them. The only thing Chrysler has going for them is there AWD Ram, GM fell behind Ford in reliability.
JayGeePee1 1 year ago
@TroySh90 finaly someone who understands why ford sucks. not because of performance, but because people doin stupid shitl ike this tears stuff up and its a bitch to fix on a ford
countrykid902 1 year ago
@TroySh90 Agreed, i'm not a mechanic, but i've worked on a ford before and it was hell... complete mess of wires, plus instead of keeping it simple and have a hub, bearing, rotor, etc. like a normal truck, they make this big messed up part that is all in one that costs more than a clutch for most vehicles.
norcobigfootrider 1 year ago
@TroySh90 isnt that the god damn truth, fords are just a big wired up mess.
tacodude20 10 months ago
@TroySh90 If GM is so easy to work on, then why cant i get the Alternator out of my Saturn? my old 88F250 was easier to work on than that thing
Crazybuickdriver 6 months ago
Only a jeep.
cobolt13 1 year ago
Stupid ass vid, I own a wrangler but have to give the ranger some respect my dad has an old 85 and it goes everywhere my jeep
Does, except for when his longer wheel base and overhang handicap him on steep grades
MegaMichael1973 1 year ago
I have no bias but am an American car lover and an MBA student: Ford stayed afloat because 1) they reacted more quickly to changes in the market and 2) they had more valuable brands in assets to sell off. They make better cars then GM or Chrystler anyway, sales, reviews, and ratings speak. read a magazine.
2.9 losing to a 4.0? is anyone suprised? get a 4.0 ranger fx4 in there boys!
MLZaccaroCT 1 year ago 3
rednecks....
Ultimatum211 1 year ago
i would my friend has a zj but he wont ever do a pull of hes a jeep girl
iwillfish4life 1 year ago
Those Rangers were decrepit pieces of garage when they were new. I was surprised that there were any left to make a vid with.
mahmahmonkey 1 year ago
i fucking hate jeeps
saucywalnuts 1 year ago
my ranger would tear that zgay
iwillfish4life 1 year ago
@iwillfish4life
A RANGER!!!! LMAO Dude seriously, you just a ford fanboy. do some research There is no way a dinky ranger is going to beat a Jeep
RCPOD 1 year ago
@RCPOD my truck would yank that chrysler pos anyday
iwillfish4life 1 year ago
You clearly have no knowledge of cars or trucks watsoever. Its not a matter of me liking jeep at all, ITS ALL NUMBERS! a ranger has nothing compared to a Jeep. Seriously get your fanboy dreams out of your ass
RCPOD 1 year ago
@RCPOD i am saying my truck vs this jeep my truck would win, no competition
iwillfish4life 1 year ago
@iwillfish4life If you've modded it then I understand. But the Wrangler is so well built they face it off against larger trucks and it holds its ground or wins.
RCPOD 1 year ago
@RCPOD with zero mods, engine 4.0=207 HP, 238Ft Lbs of torque and 4.10 gears vs 190 HP and 3.73 gearing haha no way
iwillfish4life 1 year ago
@iwillfish4life go see for yourself
RCPOD 1 year ago
@iwillfish4life Good luck. My Rubicon with diff lockers would drag you for miles
jeepownsrover 1 year ago
@jeepownsrover am i talking about a rubicon, no
iwillfish4life 1 year ago
much respect to the ford but I knew the jeep would win. Jeeps are the best off roaders (in my opinion)
lonegunman69 2 years ago
nice engine in that jeep, BUT i would still take the ranger any day over that jeep. how much do you want to bet that the jeep will get stuck before the ranger in the back woods?
supersnot4 2 years ago
Seriously? A ranger vs a ZJ offroad? That's not even a competition. ZJ = more power, more articulation, better entry/exit/breakover angles, better weight distribution. Seriously you need to go wheeling in some Jeeps, it might change your opinion on things.
dogcrick 2 years ago
i go wheeling in jeeps all the time. trust me, i go wheeling a LOT more than the average person. the reason i would rather the ranger is because it WILL last longer. meaning you can push it harder, and over time get the same as the jeep. plus, it's a truck and i can haul around my dirt bike and tow a trailer better. but hey, that's what my F-250's for. i've got more power than both of those things combined.
supersnot4 2 years ago
I see your point on having a bed to haul your bike, but my 5.2 zj with minor tuning can tow 7,000lbs at 75-90 mph all day! I can run mustang GT's up to a hundred!
dogcrick 2 years ago
@supersnot4 you'd get stuck first, hands down.
TLaPmusic 1 year ago
really depends on the trail, but the ranger will excel in most trails because it's lighter, and won't bog down. if there's something where you need weight you can just throw something in the bed.
supersnot4 1 year ago
Can't beat the torque of a 4.0 I6!!!
4wheeler14 2 years ago
@4wheeler14
No, a Ford straight-6 can.
deviousconkerer 2 years ago
@deviousconkerer Doubt that very much. The Jeep's redline is 4600 rpm. The torque develops at very low rpm's. Something like 2500
4wheeler14 2 years ago
Good point.
deviousconkerer 2 years ago
No it can't. My friend had one, it just can't even he says it can't.
CanadaBud23 2 years ago
put a 5.2 on the jeep and a 4x4 on the ford and jeep will still pull that fuckin ford like a fag doll... :)
bose3207 2 years ago
tha ford ranger had only rear wheel drive and the jeep had AWD to it's not a fear match.
dragonwars2 2 years ago
at :38 the front tires on the ranger are spinning. Plus, the guy told the driver in the ranger to put it in 4 lo. Who else would he be talking to? The jeep's windows weren't open... of course it wasn't a fair match, but who cares.
amazing1957 2 years ago
i think i could pull an awd jeep with my 2wd f250 on the street...............maybe..
FORDGTFANATIC 2 years ago
4.0 inline six, great engine! Great vehical!
Macarze 2 years ago 2
Jeeps are awesome, both my 92' cherokee and 07' wrangler have beat fords off road and racing on the street!!!
renodude18 2 years ago
HELL YEAH FORD SUX!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DemonMetal666 2 years ago
fuck you ya neon driving fagget lololololol
Flapjax102 2 years ago
if he been in 4 wheel hed done better lil rangers are lil pullin basturds in 4 low
Fc1wrestler 2 years ago
Hells Yeah! My 84 in 4 low pulled out a dodge 1 ton with a cummins out of a massive ditch. Same with a 1 ton chevy diesel and a snow plow on it.
OriginalRanger84 2 years ago
i hooked up to my dads 01 gmc sierra with a 502 big block he was in 2 wheel drive i was in 4 low he could move me but when he put it in 4 hi he drug me up the hill and any where he wanted
Fc1wrestler 2 years ago
your comparing a heavy ass fullsize with the 8.1L to a ranger with a little v6... of coarse its gonna win. There is no contest there,
OriginalRanger84 2 years ago
haha i now he was gonna win it was more of drunken fun all i was inplyin is rangers can pull and it really wasnt a contest
Fc1wrestler 2 years ago
Ahh... ok make sense. lol I have done that too with my friend and his cummins.
OriginalRanger84 2 years ago
now why the hell is the ranger not in 4wd that just made no since to me. ranger vs a damn good machine and it wasnt in 4 low. i think the ranger would have taken the jeep if it was actually in 4wd
fishininthesouth 2 years ago
Yeah the Ford was in real wheel, wtf.... RIP OFF Lol
Ford4Lyfe7 2 years ago
hearing the cam zoom is odd, and yeah... not im my ranger... isn't that bad for the tranny to be going backwards in drive let alone 4x4lo?
theschampionproject 2 years ago
that shit wouldn't happen in my ranger
VanDub 3 years ago
ya it would its just destroying the clutch.. v-6 vs v-8 the jeep has more torque and a higher towing capacity.. your ranger would loose!!
donutthrowinbdass 2 years ago
Dumbass, the jeep has an inline 6 engine, jeep didnt make a 4.0 V8 plus jeeps have more torque
renodude18 2 years ago
no se pasen de verga !
mejor le hubieran amarrado
un burro en vez de esa mamada
de troca,,,,
daniel62039 3 years ago
maybe you should have the guy driving the ford take it out of neutral and actually trying next time
jepp407 3 years ago
hua hua dumbasses 1:33
Xerxes371 3 years ago
peice of shit
juggalo4207 3 years ago
Not a fair competition at all, motor size is enough right there. Should have done 4l to 4l and 4x4 on both and would have been perfect, ranger would have for sure won.
Tribes200099 3 years ago
cherokee would it has weight advantage. power didn't matter here
jmanwild 3 years ago
that's like hooking a corvette to a civic. not sure what this is trying to prove
MLZaccaroCT 3 years ago
Haha, Ford sucks, Jeep FTW =-)
Ryartz 3 years ago
Of course, a 4.0 verses a 2.9.
mejasond 3 years ago
umm,you mean 2.3, the ranger only came in a 2.3l 4 cylnder, 3.0l V6 and a 4.0l V6 that was the same block as the tarus sho minus a few good parts. plus the jeep is a 4x4 while u can tell the ranger is the regular 2x4
necrokratia 3 years ago
nope the 2.9 was the standard v6 until 89ish
orbitofdoom16 3 years ago 2
Lol, this is so unfair.
Jeep is heavy as hell and has a 4.0 6cyl. Ranger is light as hell and has a 2.9 6cyl.
playa1313 3 years ago
oh by the way a ford straight six will fuck the junker jeep in the tail pipe
ikaikaboy88 3 years ago
Actually, the jeeps is an I6. I have an I6 and I have both raced and pulled rangers with I6's, still won jackass.
lilcretin666 3 years ago
true...that old AMC 242 is sick
iainthornton 3 years ago 2
first off fuck you lilcretin you probably dont know shit about cars you dumfuck its called a v6 and secondly jeeps suck cock as well as you
ikaikaboy88 3 years ago
Yea, aparently you don't dumbshit. All cherokee's came with a 4.0 liter Inline 6, Grand cherokees either came with the 4.0 Inline 6 or a choice of 2 v8's. Wranglers came with either a 2.8 liter Inline 4 or the 4.0 liter Inline 6. The new liberty was the first newer model to come with a 3.7 liter v6, followed by the rest of the models post 2001. So when you feel like learning something, let me know, til then fuck off unless you do your research you moron.
lilcretin666 3 years ago
That Grand Cherokee in the Video is either a 4.0 liter Inline 6, a 5.2 liter v8 or a 5.9 liter v8. THATS IT!!!! Unless they swapped the motor, thats all it could be. I have owned 3 Jeeps and have been working on them for over 7 years. I think I know what I am talking about.
lilcretin666 3 years ago
The only time there have ever been v6's in Jeeps was the 225 cubic inch "Dauntless" 1966-1971 CJ which is an old Wrangler and the 1966-1971 Jeepster which is a Wrngler car type thing, the 173 cubic inch 2.8 liter GM 1984-1986 XJ which is the normal smaller Cherokee and the MJ which is the Comanche pick up. They discontinued that motor because it sucked. The last and only other v6 Jeep has EVER made is the 3.7 liter "Power Tech" in the 2002-later KJ which is the Liberty, the 2005-later WK.
lilcretin666 3 years ago
The 2005-later WK which is the new Grand Cherokee, the 2006-later XK which is the Commander, and 2007-later Wrangler, Wrangler Unlimited, Rubicon, and Rubicon Unlimited. There are no more v6's in Jeeps history, thats it. When you need another lesson in Jeeps and how FUCKIN STUPID YOU ARE, let know, k bitch?
lilcretin666 3 years ago
you fuckin moron you could have googled all that and this all makes you look far more stupid witch btw i thought impossible it almost looks like you copied and pasted this shit you are a dum fuck mainly off of the fact that you dont under stand the weight differential your lanky tank ass jeep is a heavy piece of shit wich is by far worse that you lack that and hands down i would fuck you up physically and mentally
ikaikaboy88 3 years ago
Nope, sorry buddy, got it from the jeep 4x4 handbook. Oh yea, dumb fuck has a B at the end of dumb you dumb fuck. They really aren't heavy, they only come in at about 3800 or less for the cherokee and wrangler. I would love to see you try to hurt me, I'm a welder and I use an anvil and hammer all day, my forearm is probably about as big as your head, not to mention welders get shocked all the time and burned all the time so if I can take that, I think I can take your dumbass mexirap self.
lilcretin666 3 years ago
Nice sound system by the way, did you jack that out of a stock civic?
lilcretin666 3 years ago
Even if I did get that from google, I'm still right and you are still wrong, good job proving me right dildo. Any more complaints?
lilcretin666 3 years ago
first off your a broke joke secondly you dont have a lyf worth shit if you wait on hear to reply to my messages the same day i sent them third your probably a dum shit talking bitch so stop trying to save chryslers crappy excuse for an offroading peice of borken down shit you are a sad excuse for a human being and i fail you in life and my sound system is worth more than your shitty jeep you fuckin homo
ikaikaboy88 3 years ago
yea, 35 an hour isn't much and I only work 50 or more hours a week, I do only take home 1450 a week. Chrysler stopped making Jeeps in 2001, with the last Cherokee, the new cars are just shit, the Rubicon is the only chance Jeep has anyway. Damn, you must have a nice ass stereo system since I've put over 35,000 in parts into my Jeep. My jeep would fuckin rape you right up the ass, maybe its a homo, I never asked.
lilcretin666 3 years ago
what do you drive exactly? Your vid looks like it has a back seat, maybe a van? since you don't like chrysler or mopar, I'm guessin chevy, like a chevy van... maybe even a ford windstar, those are pretty sexy huh? Or an exploder, those are nice.... Oh oh, maybe a civic, like a crx, with a vtech, yea, nothin like a vtech, nothin like runnin some 14's when its maxed out with power. So, enlighten me bro, what do you have thats better than my 11 second lifted Jeep, or the jeep in the vid, or mopar?
lilcretin666 3 years ago
my older brother had this jeep and i bought it off him about a 1 and a half ago so lilcretin666 is right and the fords 300 straight 6 is a decent motor but is no match for jeeps 242 4.0 motor and i know personally with this jeep ive hooked to other jeeps and a lifted 86 f-150 with ford straight 6
hellraiser32492 1 year ago
@hellraiser32492 first off thats an old ass comment to be responding to... BTW i just pulled my neighbors jeep liberty out of the bushes in 4 lo with my I4 banger ranger, then raced him with my ranger sohc LOL! let him go first and still won. All in all Ford is the only company still on its own two feet and all the dodge and chevy fanboys out there should respect that it still out sells them year after year bottom line ford FTW ford GT> viper, corvette. the new 5.0 will show fanboys lol
ikaikaboy88 1 year ago
@ikaikaboy88
Wow, you sound like a fanboy yourself. Think about how much branches GM owns compared to Ford, they have much more financial responsibility. Also Ford gets so much money from the government for military and huge companies for super duty trucks and police cars. As for Chrysler, I love Chrysler, and the Wrangler should be respected. Best off road vehicle alive.
RCPOD 1 year ago
@RCPOD first off mind your own fucking buisness secondly ford gets government money for actual work not handouts. GM if you didn't know also gets paid by the government for hummer's(well before they sold it) so who you calling a fanboy?
ikaikaboy88 1 year ago
Comment removed
RCPOD 1 year ago
@ikaikaboy88
Mind my own business? you are posting your fanboy thoughts on a youtube comment section. Also sure I have a Suburban but I dont think Chevy is the best because of it, Im for JEEPS. But I love my Suburban more than almost any other car, but you know what? at least Im not jacking off to it like you are to your F150. "ZOMG I OWNz A FORDS TRUX IZ PWNAGE!!!!!" Seriously from what Im hearing in your comments is you are only looking at the name of the car and using that to figure is its
RCPOD 1 year ago
Comment removed
RCPOD 1 year ago
@RCPOD seriously from what im hearing from all your comments is you are imagining me jacking off(????) sorry buddy im not interested in your fetish and i dont really care about what you do and don't like its my own FUCKING opinion so in that sense mind your own business
ikaikaboy88 1 year ago
@ikaikaboy88 Fine, I'll mind my own business. Your right its your opinion.
RCPOD 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ikaikaboy88 ...good or bad. Seriously I laugh at how you think you're a car person because you own a ford
RCPOD 1 year ago
fuckin idiots nowadays hi on mopar dont understand that toys and rangers are lighter than durangos for the solo purpose of being on mountains watching his bigheaded ass getting stuck in mud, and then they play rock paper scissors to decide who goes and pulls his dumass out gimme a 4.0 ranger and a camper than we'll see whos got more torque
ikaikaboy88 3 years ago
Yea, thats why Moab Easter Safari has about 8,000 jeeps and 11 toyotas and 4 or 5 rangers, but you are probably right, aparently, they rock...
lilcretin666 3 years ago
This is one of the most useless truck pull videos ever. Really. Weight has tons to do with traction in this case because you're on a fucking gravel lot. Almost every one of these truck pulls comes down to traction, and usually the loser doesn't have it. Power has little to do with it. Fucktards.
indyschmidt 3 years ago
my dad had 1 and it was a i6 and it was fast but only had 24k on it
psychomiko17 3 years ago
whats with every one saying so much about the jeeps i6? i have one and it sucks alot. it has just over 200k miles on it and it runs like a champ, but its slow as hell and doesnt seem to have very much power. what am i missing?
mitchzilla117 3 years ago
you need a tune up, a stock 4.0 should run about a 15 1/4 mile no problem. stroke it to a 4.6 and you will hit 14
lilcretin666 3 years ago
i agree the ranger doesnt have the grunt or the weight to pull a jeep like that
psychomiko17 3 years ago
Probably not the best thing to do with a unibody...
Amras0407 3 years ago
thats unfair to have a 2.9 and a 4.0 in tug a war
tommyjfrew1 3 years ago
huge weight difference
bykerboy223 3 years ago
how the hell is that fair, the ranger is a 2.9 v6 and that jeep is heavy as shit and probably has a 5.2 v8
TurdFX4007 3 years ago
If you'd read first you'd notice the part where it says he has a 4.0L which is a Inline 6.
Then again even the old Ford i6's couldn't compare to this engine.
Even I'll admit there IS a big weight difference between the two.
Magnuspire 3 years ago
Props on the Ranger for tryin...
ben4x4 3 years ago
more weight = more traction simple as that
smithythefierce 3 years ago
simple fact....the ford ranger weighs about 1/2 of the cheroke....sorry dude but that cheroke would pull it away even with a smaller moto just because its able to get more traction to the ground....
ColtonSmith17 3 years ago
my truck could beat that
jorgetotheg 3 years ago
covet ill tie up with u with my 72 ranger 3 speed
SvtSavageX1 3 years ago
put my v8 jeep against any of ur shit n i would win
covet66 3 years ago
un poco torpe el conductor.
alexhuber007 3 years ago
i always get grass and stone confused too
jesseinmontana 3 years ago 2
thats some funny shit there and its in a trailer park to
muddrag79 3 years ago
stones?
makeoutkids319 3 years ago
hey dipshit who said rangers are heavier thats my truck u dumb ass it ways 2550 lbs my cousins jeep ways 6500 plus everything he has in it so before u say rangers are heavier next time read this damn comment turd cake
TroySh90 3 years ago
My 5.9 V-8 grand cherokee weighed in at 4265 with me in it at the race track I was 165lbs. That one weighs about 3900-4000lbs. THe ranger is probably the same. Different weight distribution.
gatto190 3 years ago
My ranger weighs in at around 3200-3500 pounds. They are light trucks.
86cookiemonster 3 years ago
Well no shit the idiot tried it in 4hi first. And it was a 4.0 vs a 2.9 Ill drag his damn Jeep sideways with my ranger. Its got a proper 4.0 V6
1and1is4 3 years ago
Jeep would still probably pull it because it's got more torque than a ford ranger does and more horsepower cus its an Inline6 instead of a v6
mwolverines0924 3 years ago
yea but one of the best inline six engines is the ford 4.9l inline six that they put in the f-150s and f-100s
Dylan169113 3 years ago
Put a 4.0 Heep against a 4.0 Ranger...
godspeedtoall 3 years ago
Yay.. Redneck games!
JasnoGT 3 years ago
Wow you are bad...4wd vehicles do not take off better, that is why WRXs/Evos use AWD. AWD will perform better on gravel and sand as it senses which tires have traction and keep them from digging holes. IFS work way better in most cases on the streets than a solid axle like a Jeep thats truck companies converted a long time ago to IFS for the most part from Solid axles. How is more traction there with 4WD most are open diffs and therefore only two wheel drive 1 front 1 rear...you are ignorant.
99mazdab4000 3 years ago
I was referring to AWD (vs) 2wd.
automobile91 3 years ago
Ha ha. Wow, you calling ME ignorant. HE HE. wow. But anyway, vehicles with a solid rear axle will go faster off the line than vehicles with fully independent suspension.
automobile91 3 years ago
Calm down, I know what I'm talking about. Take my word for it. :)
automobile91 3 years ago
In my first post, to which you called me ignorant, I was referring to how a 4wd alltime Jeep would beat a 2wd ranger off the line (i had thought this ranger was 2wd). Even if they were both 2wd, a ZJ with the 5.9 is a beast.
On another note, IFS is best for handling purposes and for conservation of funds. Solid axles are expensive for manufacturers. Thats why many of the new jeeps use IFS. IFS also offers more stability (less chance of rollover) but at the expense of articulation.
automobile91 3 years ago
edit* solid axles are cheaper to produce than independent suspension.
automobile91 3 years ago
Ill drag both of you at the same time. The Ranger is not much lighter than a ZJ, ZJs are unibodys and actually quite light. Automobile91 you are backwards, the Rangers make great prerunners and ZJs are much better crawlers.
99mazdab4000 3 years ago
I am not backwards buddy. A 5.9L ZJ with quadra trac will simply obliderate a Ranger in every performance category. It was the fastest SUV on the market in 1998.
automobile91 3 years ago
No I was talking strictly about weight Rangers are much heavier than the Jeeps 16 gauge unibodies. Its not about speed in off roading even prerunners the most important piece is their suspensions and LT IFS work better than a solid such as a Jeep. Then a solid axle works better for crawling. You bring me a 5.9ZJ and I will tow that thing all over the place they have lots of power but power isnt everything...Its gearing and traction and my locker and spool work a shitload better than quadratrac
99mazdab4000 3 years ago
an old ass ranger with a 2.9 against a newer jeep with a 4.0...of course the jeeps gonna win...i swear people r gettin fuckin dumber these days
cwebb07 4 years ago
i have an excuse for u-YOUR FORD IS TOO WEEEEEAAAAKK!!!!
kirbiak90ZX 4 years ago
Its called gravel dude Lol
kirbiak90ZX 4 years ago
Nice.
Have fun out there. Jeep®
atom26 4 years ago
That dumb guy in the Ranger didn't know what he was doing.
Thehelex 4 years ago
That dumb guy in the Ranger didn't know what he was doing.
Thehelex 4 years ago
Its called gravel.
abell51 4 years ago
man that camera is LOUD when it zooms.. you need to stop dropping it or something ;-)
mdsuave13 4 years ago
if the retard in the ranger knew what he was doing it would be a differnt story
gofuckagoatt 4 years ago
i've owned both and would have to completely disagree with you in all aspects. the jeep is heavier, more power, more torque, more traction... no contest at all. although if you were to race off road, i'd take the ranger in a heartbeat. Very fun to play with.
mdsuave13 4 years ago
If you were to race offroad, i'd take the zj. Its all wheel drive system allows it to jump off the line a lot more quickly than the ranger and its power will give it a higher top speed.
automobile91 4 years ago
a zj is not awd. It is either selectrac part time 4wd or quadratrac full time 4wd. Awd comes on subarus and the like. A ranger is much more nimble off road in the dunes then a zj. The jeep's power is all down low, the ranger has a revvy 4.0L that is MUCH lighter and faster then a zj.
mdsuave13 4 years ago
It is all wheel drive with quadra trac, as it can't be disengaged. Technically it is a full-time 4wd system because it has a low range gear... but it is AWD.
4wd vehicles tend to make it off the line faster, as there is more traction there, especially on gravel and sand. And it would depend on the engine of the ranger, and tires and many other factors, but the ZJ is extremely nimble.
automobile91 3 years ago
Jeep prevailes!!!!!
89wagoneer 4 years ago
I second that
speedbullet2 4 years ago