I've always felt the United States' response to the devastating events of September 11th should have been peaceful and reflective of our humanity. I created a video and posted it on my channel to honor those who lost their lives that morning and in the wars that followed. Peace is possible, but it has to start somewhere.
nice censorship you got going realnews. I was just making a point about completely unrealistic conspiracy theories not being news. Your no better than the government your oh so biased against.
Very good interview. My initial comment added that the interview is unfortunately short, but I just saw that there's a part 2 for this of roughly 16 minutes and which is entitled, "9/11 and Continuity of Government". Different Youtube page titles, but the text for part 2 says that it's part 2 for "9/11 Questions Remain Unanswered".
people please give a lot of credit to the real news. we all know that if they said that an inside job was by far the most likely possibility, they would be tarred and feathered by the mainstream media and the message would be crushed.
Free energy has been here for a while ,But some very powerfull ppl don't want you and me to be free from energy costs,Check this free energy magnet motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Join the revolution!
Watching this marvelous old prof speak so fearlessly I thank God once again for tenure. In order to protect academic freedom - otherwise we might as well close the universities - tenured professors cannot be fired for expressing their considered opinions.
there is actually no question about 911 being an inside job!
only maybe inside the US-Main-Stream Media Bubble.. were ppl have been brainwashed into believing whatever comes out of the Tube or is said by their corrupt politicians...
@psychoholicmike I didn't know about this guy, but he is fucking amazing! Thanks for the find!
watch?v=v4dmRSiy_Ko OOPS try this out 9/11 "truthers" ROFL
watch?v=QilSHm0Luj4 OOPS PROOF 9/11 "truthers" are LIARS!
watch?v=1qROovaGUEI What thermate?
/watch?v=JyKTMnKCexs&feature=related What bombs?
watch?v=Ft5y0BXOXQk&feature=related 9/11 conspiracy wackos PWNED again! Free fall? You guys are INSANE! Learn to COUNT! When Einstein said "Time is Relative" that's NOT what he was talking about ;-D
the facts are we were all lied to, theres no logical explanation for WTC7 other than explosives, we NEED a new investigation for the sake of the victims, most of who are calling for it & still being ignored!
@Botie2 sure that would explain the use of explosives & silversteins insurance policies, but there are so many motives... gold reserves under the towers, asbestos in the towers, the patriot act, the wars etc... many people died because of this event & many rich gov/media elites in the west benefited
@djdnauk1977 silverstein had the building insured for far more than it was worth. He was on the news that morning saying something weird like "If the fire fighters want access, I'll just have to colapse wtc7". Indicating he would or had wired it in preperation. It does look like a controlled demolision. And I believe I saw a BBC report of the colapse before it had happened (reported 5pm NY time and wtc went down around 7 I believe).
@Botie2 yeah silverstien said "i had to pull it" but then this info was left out of the 911 commission & yeah the WTC7 collapse was reported on BBC BEFORE it happened...like i say whatever the truth is, its very obvious to anyone with a brain cell were werent told the truth... hopefully these architects & engineers who have hard evidence will bring this into public light for those that still think the official story holds any water at all, it doesnt!
@watercup123456 if you put your faith in AJ or anyone for that matter you set yourself up for failure. Maybe you need to work out things for yourself and stop blaming people like AJ and start blaming yourself for 9/11.
Really. Acting like a spoiled brat on YouTube. Really?
My country does not sponsor or engender terrorism abroad dick shit. That's USA! GO GO USA! YAY AMERICA! TEAM AMERICA FUCK SHIT UP WORLD POLICE! FUCK YEAH!
YOU caused 9/11 loser.
YOU are the one whining like a baby trying to claim it's all a conspiracy when you have NOTHING to show such, and you cry to mommy about the facts when someone finally stands up to your paranoid bullshit. Boo fucking hoo. I think I hear the world's smallest violin...
@watercup123456 Ok. Sorry, so you meant to say CIA. Then I agree with you that the USA, sorry CIA fund and promote terrorism in it's current form all over the world. Thanks for contributing via your taxes, votes, labor and apathy. Go CIA, I mean USA!
@venuecam Its no different, the government runs cia, cia is not outside of the scope, power, and sway of the federal government (ie. the american people), it is a branch of it.
I still doubt the Bush regime pulled off 9/11 basically because they were so incompetent. These guys invaded Iraq and dismantled the entire Iraqi army, basically shooting their own occupation in the foot, and somehow they pulled off such a complex attack and cover-up? These guys had more staff in at the SD working on the embargo on Cuba than on the Middle East.
It amazes me the wall of patriotism which goes up when people are challenged on 9/11. Being English, it seems that I cannot say anything without people jumping down my throat and telling me that I wasn't there... 9/11 was an inside job, and people need to wake up and stop hiding behind comfort and ignorant bliss. Is humanity so weak as to not only be walked over, but to walk over ourselves? Sheep are controlled by dogs, we control ourselves. We're worse than the sheep.
@clancychris It wasnt an inside job. Everyone saying it was has no proof. Their arguments use incorrect science, little to no logic, and quotes with no credible source to back up that it was actually said. In fact, there are a lot of people saying different people have the exact same quote.
On a totally different note, love your voice, and your band. You guys are the next big thing in metal, and I hope you bring testosterone back into mainstream music.
@vic3003 I've watched many of these videos to find if it really was a conspiracy. Take a physics course. You'll find it is impossible for any of the theories to be true.
@darkdudironaji Actually its physicists who have been telling us just the opposite--that the physics doesn't support the official story. I refer you to the work of Professor Steven Jones & also the organization Architects & Engineers for 911 Truth. Also you might want to ponder the fact that it is apparently impossible for oxygen-starved fires burning kerosene-that's jet fuel-to get hot enough to VAPORIZE 47 massive steel columns running through the core of each building. The science is scary.
@mightymissk Let me ask you this. How is the fire starved of oxygen if there is a HUGE whole in the wall.
Did the fire only burn kerosene? No, it also burned carpet, rugs, chairs, desks, electronics, and numerous other things in the building.
Did it vaporize the steel columns? No, it weekend the steel enough for the concrete to make it collapse. After that, gravity took over the job of destroying the rest of the building.
@UNTC321 there was a HUGE hole in the side of the building, and there were pieces all over the lawn. You need to do some real research instead of all the "9/11 truth" searching.
@hobatu the precious metal market in physical is not easily manipulated. Gold, silver, palladium and platinum can each be tested. The "miniscule" comment you make is highly unimportant. All that's important is that one is not easily frauded (metals) and one is never going to zero-value (metals) and the others are. My standards are actually the strongest, your inversions of reality are weak and pathetic.
not that they have anything to do with one another they are pretty much the same thing. the kennedy assassination in 63 and 9/11 are both huge events in this nations life. both led to long drawn out ground wars in a foreign country on shaky circumstances. both oswald and the hijackers were dead before trial, all questions including jfks wounds, why the buildings fell, the inaction of the SS or the inaction of NORAD. weird rumors and stories that wont go awa. idk something doesnt add up with both
ALL thos ebuildings were controlled demolitions because THATS how the Russins totaly destroyed the CIA.
Think about it....... ALL of those 3 buildings were TEH head offices of the CIa (as well as the Pentagon). And they ALL went down within a few hours - your govt SURRENDERED to the russians, on that day !!
As someone who're in the downtown Manhattan on that morning, I'm still not 100% convinced by the official explanations. But because 9/11 is such a big and complex event, there'll be always a question that hasn't been answered. How much time should we spend on this matter? We're not going to know everything anyway.
The USer elite that owns you & "our troops"; they did it. But most USans have been successfully programmed to "believe" that the corpocratic militocracy only harvests the peoples & resources of other nations for USans benefit. That is such a leap of faith considering our slums, Third World infrastructure, edukashunal institutions for our poor and ethnics & serial wars for the xiodons that feed their supremacist media filth into our "living rooms".
At the highest level of lies, why wouldn't anyone be able to draw the conclusion that not only is the Gov lieing about this, but Islam is also a key to why 3,000+ Americans are dead..
Whether 9/11 was a result of incompetence of the government or was an inside job doesn't really matter. The only sane response to realize that the government is not going to protect you, never has, never will, and will continue to lie to you to collect more tax revenue until it collapses.
wow allot of scared little zombies here. Oh no plz dont ask questions about 911, only conspiracy theori, what does some architect and engineer know? I hope you fuckers are insiders and not real people, if im wrong that means your all
FUCKING CHICKEN CUNTS!!!
TRNN asks REAL questions, now go back to Bill Oreily , Glen Beck and Hannity.
@kharitonov300 "wow allot of scared little zombies here. Oh no plz dont ask questions about 911, only conspiracy theori, what does some architect and engineer know? I hope you fuckers are insiders and not real people, if im wrong that means your all"
I can say the same thing about anything dude. Evolution, climate change, HIV causing aids, the moon landing. Your statement is meaningless and full of anger. chill out.
@truthofevolution Yes, maybe you should start questioning all those theories and only accept those, that are consistent and don´t contradict. Doing so methodically is called "science" - and not the presentation of certain results. One might even end up with similar results, but if one doesn´t dare to go through the process for him/herself, one cannot call his/her thinking scientific or logical!
Besides there´s evidence, that contradicts the official 911 theory...
1 Whats wrong with asking questions? About any subject. Be it 911 or the HIV? Its not like the media and the governments dont lie, cuz i KNOW they do. So why cant you ask questions?
And an even bigger question is, why does so many people (scared little zombies) agree that asking these questions is wrong? What are they afraid of finding out? You can chill out if you want. But the familys of 911 cant chill out, the people of Iraq/afganistan cant "chill out"
2 These architect and engineers are the experts in these questions, perhaps they have some thing importants to say? But No, you say its conspiracy theori? what exactly do you know about structural and construcion engineering? Did you study in university? did you work on site, doing the calculations for something? If the answer is NO, i advice you to let the REAL expert ask these questions. Specially while people are dying in the name of freedom and truth by my tax money!
@kharitonov300 To me that is the most scary part of 911 and the US wars: the public denial of logical thinking. You´re considered to be an extremist, if you dare to take a theory to its logical consequence - that´s why bullshit rules the media. Seems like people are much to afraid of responsibility for real democracy...
@TheHomoludens i agree, it is the most scary part. Normal people turning into watchdogs and attacking normal people, sometimes even people they know, for asking questions. These people need to wake up. And the rest of us need to work harder on helping to wake them up.
@kharitonov300 I know, I´m getting off topic, but: there have been a lot of people trying to wake up others; but as the saying goes:
you can wake up somebody that sleeps, but you cannot wake up anybody, that pretends to sleep...
Being "normal" (without knowing or asking what that is) is the game of the social animal called "human", only those facing their own instinct based behaviour should be considered grown ups!
@TheHomoludens My friend, you speak the hard truth. Even though many are pretending to sleep and really dont want to wake up. We cant loose hope. We must try harder. The house they are sleeping in is burning and the smoke is everywhere, and the people want to keep sleeping even though they are awake. These people will die of the smoke way before the heat comes. And we must try harder. Not by telling them, but showing them, getting them interested. Never give up never stop, cuz our enemys dont!
* Acting FBI director testified that the US AG John Ashcroft said he would fire anyone who even mentioned the word terrorist to him. Ashcroft "denied remembering" just like his successor Gonzalez did so many times afterward. * Then there is the unintercepted call from Afghanistan to a known US cell that NSA could have intercepted legally. The de facto President, Cheney didn't plan 911 but HE KNEW. You reelected him in 2004 & u will bring the RNC back to power Nov 2010 & 2012. *Good Job* I
@tmcthree exactly! The video evidence alone gives ironclad proof that all of those buildings at the WTC complex came down due to controlled demolition. There is no question to it.
@tmcthree Hilarious! "The rubble was picked up and taken away by the military before an investigation of the crime scene could be done! Ohhh you saw popular mechanics and now the case is closed is that it? Manhattan was covered with 2 feet of dust but no it was a sandwich of floors that came down at free fall that created that? Please!Go back to school! Stand aside and be quiet while the rest of us who aren't gutless ask real questions and fight for truth, that's what real patriots do....
It's astonishing that all you have to do is watch any of the hundreds of videos to see that the buildings didn't fall at free fall speed, and yet you parrot it out. Go and watch any of the videos that show the entire collapse. You fucking moron!
It is amazing to me that the real perpetrators got away with this rather poorly executed false flag. They have left their fingerprints all over this thing and never could produce a coherent "official theory". Never mind that one only has to look at the footage of the buildings coming down to know that it all a pack of lies.
@truthofevolution to conspire means 2 or more people planning, so no matter what happened on 9/11 it was a conspiracy.
Their is nothing farcical about asking questions as to why a steel framed building fell at free fall speeds due to fire damage, that has huge ramifications.
What is wrong is believing that because it was a tragedy we should not ask questions but buy into whatever the media or government tell us. You may be able to suspend disbelief but inteligent, honest people cannot.
@thenewvoice8 actually i consider myself an intelligent and honest person and I think the whole thing is ridiculous considering the questions have already been soundly answered by experts who understand the subject better than anyone. They are not part of the government or media. And if you think they are working together to cook up such a complicated story, I dont know what to tell you.
There's a tremendous difference between skeptical and believing in dumbass theories that the vast majority of architects, engineers, and physics professionals disagree with.
@cheddyrod yes it was. They guy says he doesnt know how the towers fell, as if that question hasnt been answered. It has. Hes just refusing to look. That sort of obfuscation is horrible.
@cheddyrod When he says "we dont know what brought down the buildings" what does he mean? Well there is an official explanation that the planes brought the buildings down. I take it that he rejects this explanation. He is implying that something other than the planes brought it down. Thats conspiracy talk. Do you see now?
As I said they do not discuss it outright, but when they ask questions that were already answered, they are implying that they reject the answer.
@truthofevolution You asked 'Do you see now'? I see your mind is closed. If you had taken some science courses in your life you might have a more investigative mind. When you use words like 'Berkeley guy' it tells me a lot about you! You are assuming that he is implying things because that is what you are thinking and not what he is saying. He did not mention conspiracy theory but YOU think he implied it.
@cheddyrod Berkeley guy says "we dont know what brought the buildings down" yes we do. "we dont know who was on the planes" yes we do. Thats all conspiracy talk. They frame it that they are "just asking questions" to obfuscate this point.
@truthofevolution man the guy is making a point about how obvious it is that planes hit some buildings and they went down, and thats the official story. when he says " we don't know what brought the buildings down" or what ever, he's talking about the fact of a cover up, which is what his book is about...
i am subscribed to you guys, but apparently I agree with you on every issue except this. There is no debate raging amongst experts. There is only debate amongst people who have no idea what they are talking about. I can say the same about debate raging about whether HIV causes aids. There are almost no real experts who believe that.
@truthofevolution what about 1200 qualified architects & engineers for the 9/11 re-investigation? are they part of the group of people who u say don't know what they're talking about?
@troll Is that like that anti anthropogenic global warming petition of 31,000 oil shills claiming to be Phd's and accredited scientists, people like mickey mouse, brittany spears, and tom cruise??
OOH no those couple guys who came up with fake names to fill up a bogus petition with are cointel pro. Alex jones knows them, ask him for their cell numbers ;-D
@sonicsuns jet fuel and impacts can't take down those towers, that's the conclusion every single time, especially not at free-fall speeds. Physically impossible. Only one detail can make it true: collapse from the supports all at once. Nothing else can make it happen. Jet fuel can't melt steel, GET SOME, melt some steel. Doesn't work. That's why we have this thing called "coking ovens" for melting / making steel
@ytgv3fc7 Except PHYSICS concludes EVERY TIME that planes hitting buildings with all their jet fuel WILL cause structural collapse of buildings (also the towers DID NOT fall at free fall speed LEARN PHYSICS DUMMY).
Jet fuel didn't have to melt steel to cause a collapse. It only needed to warp it causing it to lose it's strength which in turn to caused structural failure of the buildings. Which is EXACTLY what happened, you can SEE the girders bending inward in all videos of the wtc buildings!
@watercup123456 Time the collapse which was about 9-10 seconds and calculate how far an object would have to be to fall at that speed. You'll get the height of towers. Besides, looking at the video of the impact, you'll see a huge fireball. That fireball was the jet fuel. But with all that said, I do believe the plane crashes caused the collapse of the towers.
The plane crashes could not have caused the collapse. If the damage was severe enough (which I doubt with just one jet liner), then perhaps the portion of the building would topple over. But that's not the case. The WT were meant to withstand multiple impacts of jet liners. These buildings came down at free fall speed. NOT NORMAL.
@Hells2TheYea The buildings did not topple over because of one very good reason - gravity. The path of least resistance is straight down, not to the left or right, which is why the tops of the buildings from where the impact damage was sustained did not topple over, they collapsed inward as the bottom portion of the impact site gave away caving in on itself.
Meant to does not equal will.
So what about free fall? Doesn't matter how fast/slow they fell it doesn't prove bombs lameo :P
WTC2 was 2/3 unaffected by the hit. WTC1 was 4/5 unaffected. Only a small portion was damaged. Logic says that the building (if damaged enough in the section it was hit), it would topple over in the direction where the hole is. One of the buildings does this before it implodes on itself. The unaffected part of the buildings should not have caved in on itself. AT ALL. The collapse would go slower because of the resistance of the affected floors, not at free fall speed.
Only a small portion needs to be damaged to cause a collapse. LEARN PHYSICS LEARN LOGIC!
No, it wouldn't topple over, I already explained why. The "hole", is all the way through, not just one side. LEARN PHYSICS.
There is no implosion, you are insane. LEARN PHYSICS.
The affected parts definitely should have caved in on themselves, otherwise I would start to doubt the theory of gravity! The collapse was not at free fall. LEARN PHYSICS!
@watercup123456 Hey watercup...does gravity cause all supports and trusts connecting to each floor to fail at exactly the same time? does gravity cause the core structure to fail first when 87 floors including the core was undamaged, does gravity cause near free fall collapse...myself as well as millions of others think NOT!
Sounds like your talking absolute bullshit watercup...or is that PISSPOT?
@moron The supports didn't fail at the same time you fucking liar, they failed as the building fell on top of itself (and the core WAS damaged!) WATCH THE VIDEOS LIAR!
Yes gravity DOES cause the structure to fall straight down. I don't know what the fuck you are babbling about the core or some shit, LEARN PHYSICS!
E=mc^2 READ UP ON IT LOSER!
Nothing you say is in any way factual or logical, and bears no resemblance to what happened to the buildings on that day. What a fucking lying dip shit!
@watercup123456 So what about free fall?Doesn't matter how fast/slow they fell it doesn't prove bombs lameo :P
VERY NORMAL.
HOW IS THAT NORMAL WHEN ITS NEVER HAPPENED BEFORE OR AFTER 9/11?
IS BUILDING 7,s COLLAPSE NORMAL AS WELL?
CAN ANYONE PROVIDE PROOF OF A STEEL FRAMED SKYSCRAPER EVER COLLAPSING DUE TO FIRE AND PLANE IMPACT, MYSELF AND MILLIONS OF OTHERS WOULD LOVE TO SEE IT.
When the truth comes out, there should be a round up of all shills...and they should be treated without mercy
@watercup123456 9 years after vietnam we did not know about the false flag attack of the gulf of tonkin incident which was used as justification for the vietnam war
Gulf of Tonkin does not equal bush did 9/11, and it ESPECIALLY does not equal bombs in buildings.
Did usa gov know about 9/11 and let usa be attacked? This is pretty much historical record. Did usa gov have a hand in (training/supporting/creating-planning operations/ etc) outside of simply engendering terrorism with it's own terrorist foreign policy? Highly unlikely but possible. Were there bombs in the buildings? No you idiot don't be absurd.
@watercup123456 none of what u said changes the fact that the public did not hear about the false flag gulf of tonkin incident that was used as justification for the vietnam war until the NSA declassified the documents in 2005; a full 41 years after the fact, never mind the 9 years that have elapsed since 9/11
@watercup123456 wait another 20 years when the files are declassified like usual. Until then let those who can see the truth speak the truth... shhhhhhhh
@loser How is that normal? To my knowledge MISSILES HAVE HIT PLENTY OF BUILDINGS AND THEY COLLAPSED AS A RESULT. Huge planes = missiles. You are fucking insane.
Yes building's 7 collapse IS NORMAL (when you LOOK at the MASSIVE DAMAGE 7 had instead of failing to ignore this FACT like a moron 9/11 "truther").
Building 7 had nearly it's whole face gouged out right down the middle by debris (but alex jones and loose change don't show you the pictures of THIS SIDE that was damaged). OOPS ;-D
@dumbass Proof that missile planes can take out buildings? How about you look to the first gulf war? Plenty of examples of munitions taking down buildings.
The cia taught the taliban fighters these techniques for a reason - they work. It was not the first time the wtc was attacked (and bombs COULD NOT bring the building down, there was not enough damage).
You saw it again with the second Iraq war - planes can take down buildings, just like missiles (b/c at that point, that is what they are).
Its funny, cause I used to follow alex jones and think there were bombs in the buildings too..
Until I LEARNED PHYSICS :-D
Until I RESEARCHED what aj and loose change were saying (to see if they were telling the truth - and they were NOT!).
Until I SAW THE DAMAGE TO BUILDING 7, the side/pics/ and vids aj and loose change won't show you (because it has MASSIVE DAMAGE), and anyone who sees this damage can easily know how and why it collapsed as it did.
@watercup123456 The world trade center was designed to withstand a direct hit of a jet plane, which when you see the fireball from the colision that was the fuel burning off , so. much for fuel. There was a building in Spain which was on fire for 5 days with a crane on it and the skeleton stands. The empire state bldg was hit by a bomber and it did not fall,. Every war was a false flag operation,
@mikeoli I fucking just said that "meant to" does not equal "will" or "does" withstand.
Many buildings are built to withstand this that and the other thing. In earthquake riddled zones they build buildings to withstand the earthquake.. But they still fall down when there is enough damage done.
THE FUCKING BUILDING WAS ON FIRE YOU MORON WATCH THE VIDEOS
I don't care how much jet fuel burnt off - BUILDINGS ON FIRE, YOU FUCKING IDIOT LOL
@watercup123456 do your homework. EVERY war fought related to British aristocracy that has been documented was financed on both sides by the largest banks on Earth. Including but not limited to Battle of Waterloo, American Civil War, WWI, WWII, Vietnam, Korea, Gulf, Afghanistan, Iraq, and soon to be Iran etc, etc, If you did your homework you would know that every war is a false flag event. Why? Cos wars create windfalls for economies :O Ask your grandparents how their economy boomed for WWII
There are other things at work here besides gravity... You do know that right? I mean you do know physics, right? Let me refresh your memory.
The path of least resistance WOULD be straight down IF there was no resistance. And there wasn't b/c they fell at nearly free fall speed. The unaffected floors ( 4/5 of building 1& 2/3 of building 2) would SLOW DOWN the collapse because of FRICTION. Aka INERTIA. That's Physics.
@Hells2TheYea You don't understand gravity. Go do a google search or something.
There is no way ANYONE could have known that the planes would have hit the towers (they could have just as easily missed), and that wtc 7 would have been hit by so much debris and be so badly damaged. In spite of this it still just so happened to be a controlled demolition.
Hows that common sense working out for you yet? Oh, you aren't using any. No fucking shit!
@troll Now this dip shit was claiming the planes were remote controlled drones LOL
Those pilots just killed themselves when the plane took on a life of its own AHAHAHAHAHAHA OMFG ROFL
And then the pentagon crashed them into the ocean or something, lets not use the actual planes for the actual terrorist mission now ROFL HOLY FUCK YOU ARE INSANE!
You don't know what the fuck you are babbling about!
What a paranoid insane loser. Thanks for ruining any shred of credibility you never had ;-D
@Hells2TheYea You are a liar and you have no fucking clue what you are babbling about. None of the buildings sustained free fall speed for any long period. From wiki "In the case of both towers, the top section tilted towards the face that had buckled, behaving largely as a solid block separate from the rest of the building. It fell at least one story in freefall and impacted the lower sections with a force equivalent to over thirty times its own weight."
@watercup123456 This video shows a demolition SIDE BY SIDE with WTC 7. IDENTICAL timing action. YOU are a dirty liar and a fraud and should shut your dirt-eating liar mouth.
watch?v=73qK4j32iuo
Your "buckling" is a FICTIONAL STATEMENT, NEVER DID HAPPEN.
Shame on you. SHAME. Go hang yourself, improve the planet's IQ
@troll Well, nothing more need be said to a LYING TROLL who claims buckling of the buildings never happened WHEN YOU CAN SEE IT HAPPEN ON VIDEO YOU FUCKING LIAR OMFG ROFL
How fucking stupid are you?
You REALLY think childish lies like this will actually work? What a fucking loser!
@Hells2TheYea "This was sufficient to buckle the columns of the story immediately below it; the block then fell freely through the distance of another story.Total collapse was now unavoidable as the process repeated through the entire height of the lower sections.The force of each impact was also much greater than the horizontal momentum of the section, which kept the tilt from increasing significantly before the falling section reached the ground."
@Hells2TheYea "It remained intact throughout the collapse, with its center of gravity within the building's footprint. After crushing the lower section of the building, it was itself crushed when it hit the ground... [On WTC 7] NIST explains that fire was the main reason for the collapse, along with lack of water to fight the fire. Fires continued to burn throughout the afternoon on the lower floors. At 5:20 p.m. a critical column buckled, leading to the collapse of floor 13, "
This has been flagged as spam show
I've always felt the United States' response to the devastating events of September 11th should have been peaceful and reflective of our humanity. I created a video and posted it on my channel to honor those who lost their lives that morning and in the wars that followed. Peace is possible, but it has to start somewhere.
marcpedraza 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
megamogx 5 months ago
nice censorship you got going realnews. I was just making a point about completely unrealistic conspiracy theories not being news. Your no better than the government your oh so biased against.
mrvendetor 11 months ago
Comment removed
mrvendetor 1 year ago
What is 9/11? Is that when those buildings fell down? What happened?
truckerfromreno 1 year ago
Very good interview. My initial comment added that the interview is unfortunately short, but I just saw that there's a part 2 for this of roughly 16 minutes and which is entitled, "9/11 and Continuity of Government". Different Youtube page titles, but the text for part 2 says that it's part 2 for "9/11 Questions Remain Unanswered".
mikecorbeil 1 year ago
Comment removed
mikecorbeil 1 year ago
people please give a lot of credit to the real news. we all know that if they said that an inside job was by far the most likely possibility, they would be tarred and feathered by the mainstream media and the message would be crushed.
MrBlinkmiss 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free energy has been here for a while ,But some very powerfull ppl don't want you and me to be free from energy costs,Check this free energy magnet motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Join the revolution!
violafinishda 1 year ago
Watching this marvelous old prof speak so fearlessly I thank God once again for tenure. In order to protect academic freedom - otherwise we might as well close the universities - tenured professors cannot be fired for expressing their considered opinions.
mightymissk 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Create a profile and search a naughty lady mworld5.info
nadiniism 1 year ago
how can an excuse for globalistic dictatorship be an Inside-job ?...this was an international job, a globalist-job..........
maelstone 1 year ago
there is actually no question about 911 being an inside job!
only maybe inside the US-Main-Stream Media Bubble.. were ppl have been brainwashed into believing whatever comes out of the Tube or is said by their corrupt politicians...
log140 1 year ago
I remain skeptical about the "9/11 Truth" movement. Check out user "DPRJones", he had some good videos on this topic...
psychoholicmike 1 year ago
@psychoholicmike I didn't know about this guy, but he is fucking amazing! Thanks for the find!
watch?v=v4dmRSiy_Ko OOPS try this out 9/11 "truthers" ROFL
watch?v=QilSHm0Luj4 OOPS PROOF 9/11 "truthers" are LIARS!
watch?v=1qROovaGUEI What thermate?
/watch?v=JyKTMnKCexs&feature=related What bombs?
watch?v=Ft5y0BXOXQk&feature=related 9/11 conspiracy wackos PWNED again! Free fall? You guys are INSANE! Learn to COUNT! When Einstein said "Time is Relative" that's NOT what he was talking about ;-D
watercup123456 1 year ago
Finally TheRealNews network at work!
Reqrezentin 1 year ago
the facts are we were all lied to, theres no logical explanation for WTC7 other than explosives, we NEED a new investigation for the sake of the victims, most of who are calling for it & still being ignored!
djdnauk1977 1 year ago
@djdnauk1977 There is another logical explanation, insurance job.
Botie2 1 year ago
@Botie2 sure that would explain the use of explosives & silversteins insurance policies, but there are so many motives... gold reserves under the towers, asbestos in the towers, the patriot act, the wars etc... many people died because of this event & many rich gov/media elites in the west benefited
djdnauk1977 1 year ago
@djdnauk1977 silverstein had the building insured for far more than it was worth. He was on the news that morning saying something weird like "If the fire fighters want access, I'll just have to colapse wtc7". Indicating he would or had wired it in preperation. It does look like a controlled demolision. And I believe I saw a BBC report of the colapse before it had happened (reported 5pm NY time and wtc went down around 7 I believe).
Botie2 1 year ago
@Botie2 yeah silverstien said "i had to pull it" but then this info was left out of the 911 commission & yeah the WTC7 collapse was reported on BBC BEFORE it happened...like i say whatever the truth is, its very obvious to anyone with a brain cell were werent told the truth... hopefully these architects & engineers who have hard evidence will bring this into public light for those that still think the official story holds any water at all, it doesnt!
djdnauk1977 1 year ago
@hobatu I'm a scientist, I deal with fact, not conspiracy theories.
ytgv3fc7 1 year ago
Why do people overload the comments arguing like children?...
HipHopGuardian 1 year ago
Scott and the interviewer...are you both retarded? If you can't figure out what happened with all the information available then you must be.
gary97209 1 year ago
The Plane in one of the "videos of 9/11" exploded just like the JASM Missile
JDaKingman 1 year ago
Alex jones fucking lied to us! And he lied about global warming and fluoride in the water too!
watercup123456 1 year ago
@watercup123456 if you put your faith in AJ or anyone for that matter you set yourself up for failure. Maybe you need to work out things for yourself and stop blaming people like AJ and start blaming yourself for 9/11.
Really. Acting like a spoiled brat on YouTube. Really?
venuecam 1 year ago
@venuecam How did I do anything to cause 9/11?
My country does not sponsor or engender terrorism abroad dick shit. That's USA! GO GO USA! YAY AMERICA! TEAM AMERICA FUCK SHIT UP WORLD POLICE! FUCK YEAH!
YOU caused 9/11 loser.
YOU are the one whining like a baby trying to claim it's all a conspiracy when you have NOTHING to show such, and you cry to mommy about the facts when someone finally stands up to your paranoid bullshit. Boo fucking hoo. I think I hear the world's smallest violin...
watercup123456 1 year ago
@watercup123456 Ok. Sorry, so you meant to say CIA. Then I agree with you that the USA, sorry CIA fund and promote terrorism in it's current form all over the world. Thanks for contributing via your taxes, votes, labor and apathy. Go CIA, I mean USA!
venuecam 1 year ago
@venuecam Its no different, the government runs cia, cia is not outside of the scope, power, and sway of the federal government (ie. the american people), it is a branch of it.
watercup123456 1 year ago
I still doubt the Bush regime pulled off 9/11 basically because they were so incompetent. These guys invaded Iraq and dismantled the entire Iraqi army, basically shooting their own occupation in the foot, and somehow they pulled off such a complex attack and cover-up? These guys had more staff in at the SD working on the embargo on Cuba than on the Middle East.
AndrewMann552 1 year ago
It amazes me the wall of patriotism which goes up when people are challenged on 9/11. Being English, it seems that I cannot say anything without people jumping down my throat and telling me that I wasn't there... 9/11 was an inside job, and people need to wake up and stop hiding behind comfort and ignorant bliss. Is humanity so weak as to not only be walked over, but to walk over ourselves? Sheep are controlled by dogs, we control ourselves. We're worse than the sheep.
clancychris 1 year ago
@clancychris If you really want to know what's going on then research the following three entities:
The Crown (City of London) - Financial Capital of the World.
Washington D.C. (District of Columbia) - Military Capital of the World.
Vatican City - Spiritual Capital of the World
Find out how they are all linked then you might be able to make sense of what's going on right now. Peace
venuecam 1 year ago
@clancychris It wasnt an inside job. Everyone saying it was has no proof. Their arguments use incorrect science, little to no logic, and quotes with no credible source to back up that it was actually said. In fact, there are a lot of people saying different people have the exact same quote.
On a totally different note, love your voice, and your band. You guys are the next big thing in metal, and I hope you bring testosterone back into mainstream music.
darkdudironaji 1 year ago
@darkdudironaji Your a fucking moron.
vic3003 1 year ago
@vic3003 I've watched many of these videos to find if it really was a conspiracy. Take a physics course. You'll find it is impossible for any of the theories to be true.
darkdudironaji 1 year ago
@darkdudironaji Actually its physicists who have been telling us just the opposite--that the physics doesn't support the official story. I refer you to the work of Professor Steven Jones & also the organization Architects & Engineers for 911 Truth. Also you might want to ponder the fact that it is apparently impossible for oxygen-starved fires burning kerosene-that's jet fuel-to get hot enough to VAPORIZE 47 massive steel columns running through the core of each building. The science is scary.
mightymissk 1 year ago
@mightymissk Let me ask you this. How is the fire starved of oxygen if there is a HUGE whole in the wall.
Did the fire only burn kerosene? No, it also burned carpet, rugs, chairs, desks, electronics, and numerous other things in the building.
Did it vaporize the steel columns? No, it weekend the steel enough for the concrete to make it collapse. After that, gravity took over the job of destroying the rest of the building.
Scientists said global warming was real too.
darkdudironaji 1 year ago
@darkdudironaji The same huge hole at the pentagon?
UNTC321 1 year ago
@UNTC321 There was a huge hole in the pentagon too, yes.
darkdudironaji 1 year ago
@darkdudironaji How huge? No damage to lawn or side of building were engines would have hit.
UNTC321 1 year ago
@UNTC321 there was a HUGE hole in the side of the building, and there were pieces all over the lawn. You need to do some real research instead of all the "9/11 truth" searching.
darkdudironaji 1 year ago
@mightymissk But if the building is made of Lego it can melt in those temperatures.
truckerfromreno 1 year ago
test
georip 1 year ago
Who, What, Where, When, Why, How?
Jew Tube > watch?v=nT3E32GyymY
pigfister 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Lol what a joke.
anthonzi 1 year ago
@hobatu the precious metal market in physical is not easily manipulated. Gold, silver, palladium and platinum can each be tested. The "miniscule" comment you make is highly unimportant. All that's important is that one is not easily frauded (metals) and one is never going to zero-value (metals) and the others are. My standards are actually the strongest, your inversions of reality are weak and pathetic.
ytgv3fc7 1 year ago
not that they have anything to do with one another they are pretty much the same thing. the kennedy assassination in 63 and 9/11 are both huge events in this nations life. both led to long drawn out ground wars in a foreign country on shaky circumstances. both oswald and the hijackers were dead before trial, all questions including jfks wounds, why the buildings fell, the inaction of the SS or the inaction of NORAD. weird rumors and stories that wont go awa. idk something doesnt add up with both
pat442389 1 year ago
Again "TheRealNews' lives up to its name!
dictionary
Real : true; not merely ostensible, nominal, or apparent
news : a report of a recent event; intelligence; information
PeaceFroggs 1 year ago 3
@TheRealNews
could you not frame this in a pro-truther manner?
AndroidPolitician 1 year ago
ALL thos ebuildings were controlled demolitions because THATS how the Russins totaly destroyed the CIA.
Think about it....... ALL of those 3 buildings were TEH head offices of the CIa (as well as the Pentagon). And they ALL went down within a few hours - your govt SURRENDERED to the russians, on that day !!
WORK IT OUT !!!
They saved their own asses !!!
AnnoyingTypoSyndrome 1 year ago
9/11 Questions Remain Unanswered ... to some people trying to sell books.
DarthSchwartz 1 year ago
@DarthSchwartz No to intelligent people who actually Read books.
badstacksize 1 year ago
september 11, 1973 are we forgetting what the us/cia did?
solimiansky 1 year ago
good report
benbaghira 1 year ago
Thanks Paul for interviewing Peter on this issue. He's been vocal about the discrepancies in the 9/11 report for years.
everybody21990 1 year ago 2
As someone who're in the downtown Manhattan on that morning, I'm still not 100% convinced by the official explanations. But because 9/11 is such a big and complex event, there'll be always a question that hasn't been answered. How much time should we spend on this matter? We're not going to know everything anyway.
yusukeshinyama 1 year ago
The USer elite that owns you & "our troops"; they did it. But most USans have been successfully programmed to "believe" that the corpocratic militocracy only harvests the peoples & resources of other nations for USans benefit. That is such a leap of faith considering our slums, Third World infrastructure, edukashunal institutions for our poor and ethnics & serial wars for the xiodons that feed their supremacist media filth into our "living rooms".
Anyone still NOT heard about OFFICER TIPPET?
charliebarosio 1 year ago
At the highest level of lies, why wouldn't anyone be able to draw the conclusion that not only is the Gov lieing about this, but Islam is also a key to why 3,000+ Americans are dead..
mparker469 1 year ago
Whether 9/11 was a result of incompetence of the government or was an inside job doesn't really matter. The only sane response to realize that the government is not going to protect you, never has, never will, and will continue to lie to you to collect more tax revenue until it collapses.
VyseLegend 1 year ago
By who ?
Ae9/11truth.org
Get an education !
GenerationWTF 1 year ago
@GenerationWTF
Go to ae911truth(dot)info/wordpress/ and get a real education.
TheAntiV 1 year ago
wow allot of scared little zombies here. Oh no plz dont ask questions about 911, only conspiracy theori, what does some architect and engineer know? I hope you fuckers are insiders and not real people, if im wrong that means your all
FUCKING CHICKEN CUNTS!!!
TRNN asks REAL questions, now go back to Bill Oreily , Glen Beck and Hannity.
kharitonov300 1 year ago 34
@kharitonov300 "wow allot of scared little zombies here. Oh no plz dont ask questions about 911, only conspiracy theori, what does some architect and engineer know? I hope you fuckers are insiders and not real people, if im wrong that means your all"
I can say the same thing about anything dude. Evolution, climate change, HIV causing aids, the moon landing. Your statement is meaningless and full of anger. chill out.
truthofevolution 1 year ago
@truthofevolution Yes, maybe you should start questioning all those theories and only accept those, that are consistent and don´t contradict. Doing so methodically is called "science" - and not the presentation of certain results. One might even end up with similar results, but if one doesn´t dare to go through the process for him/herself, one cannot call his/her thinking scientific or logical!
Besides there´s evidence, that contradicts the official 911 theory...
TheHomoludens 1 year ago
@truthofevolution
1 Whats wrong with asking questions? About any subject. Be it 911 or the HIV? Its not like the media and the governments dont lie, cuz i KNOW they do. So why cant you ask questions?
And an even bigger question is, why does so many people (scared little zombies) agree that asking these questions is wrong? What are they afraid of finding out? You can chill out if you want. But the familys of 911 cant chill out, the people of Iraq/afganistan cant "chill out"
kharitonov300 1 year ago
@kharitonov300 please dont ask questions about the moon landing, only conspiracy theori. a llot of scared little zombies here.
See thats how much value your words have.
truthofevolution 1 year ago
@truthofevolution
2 These architect and engineers are the experts in these questions, perhaps they have some thing importants to say? But No, you say its conspiracy theori? what exactly do you know about structural and construcion engineering? Did you study in university? did you work on site, doing the calculations for something? If the answer is NO, i advice you to let the REAL expert ask these questions. Specially while people are dying in the name of freedom and truth by my tax money!
kharitonov300 1 year ago
@kharitonov300 To me that is the most scary part of 911 and the US wars: the public denial of logical thinking. You´re considered to be an extremist, if you dare to take a theory to its logical consequence - that´s why bullshit rules the media. Seems like people are much to afraid of responsibility for real democracy...
TheHomoludens 1 year ago
@TheHomoludens i agree, it is the most scary part. Normal people turning into watchdogs and attacking normal people, sometimes even people they know, for asking questions. These people need to wake up. And the rest of us need to work harder on helping to wake them up.
kharitonov300 1 year ago
@kharitonov300 I know, I´m getting off topic, but: there have been a lot of people trying to wake up others; but as the saying goes:
you can wake up somebody that sleeps, but you cannot wake up anybody, that pretends to sleep...
Being "normal" (without knowing or asking what that is) is the game of the social animal called "human", only those facing their own instinct based behaviour should be considered grown ups!
TheHomoludens 1 year ago
@TheHomoludens My friend, you speak the hard truth. Even though many are pretending to sleep and really dont want to wake up. We cant loose hope. We must try harder. The house they are sleeping in is burning and the smoke is everywhere, and the people want to keep sleeping even though they are awake. These people will die of the smoke way before the heat comes. And we must try harder. Not by telling them, but showing them, getting them interested. Never give up never stop, cuz our enemys dont!
kharitonov300 1 year ago
@kharitonov300 :
Im sure that many chickens would be offended by your comment - especially teh male ones, who value them, highly !!
AnnoyingTypoSyndrome 1 year ago
@kharitonov300 what it means to me is that you unfortunately have a limited grasp of the English language.
Elin48 1 year ago
@kharitonov300 These people are the on line extension of the cover up.
Do you people really believe they would let us discuss this with out any opposition?
MustacheVerra 1 year ago
plenty of trolls here,either ignorant or insiders.
madmatz01 1 year ago
@madmatz01
Or just people who know what they're talking about.
TheAntiV 1 year ago
danger0usknowledge 1 year ago
so true.. i mean WTC 7? the pentagon??? Vigilant Guardian??? there is too much going on for it to be so simple .
grnbbllntrck 1 year ago 11
Comment removed
colmanjones 1 year ago
/watch?v=Bf7Z_I1CAZ4
Arkinight 1 year ago
This is a really disappointing piece.
The engineering failures surrounding the building collapses are the most investigated and documented failures in history.
We know exactly why all the buildings collapsed.
tmcthree 1 year ago
@tmcthree "We know exactly why all the buildings collapsed."
Explosives.
Northern5tar 1 year ago 5
@tmcthree exactly! The video evidence alone gives ironclad proof that all of those buildings at the WTC complex came down due to controlled demolition. There is no question to it.
DemonDik 1 year ago 3
@tmcthree Hilarious! "The rubble was picked up and taken away by the military before an investigation of the crime scene could be done! Ohhh you saw popular mechanics and now the case is closed is that it? Manhattan was covered with 2 feet of dust but no it was a sandwich of floors that came down at free fall that created that? Please!Go back to school! Stand aside and be quiet while the rest of us who aren't gutless ask real questions and fight for truth, that's what real patriots do....
TheAuspicious 1 year ago 3
@TheAuspicious
It's astonishing that all you have to do is watch any of the hundreds of videos to see that the buildings didn't fall at free fall speed, and yet you parrot it out. Go and watch any of the videos that show the entire collapse. You fucking moron!
tmcthree 1 year ago
@tmcthree LOL, you watching the videos in slow motion or something??
TheAuspicious 1 year ago
@tmcthree Does it include all the thermite they found?
yo1dude1man 1 year ago 3
A healthy democracy depends upon there being a healthy news media that is unfettered in it's quest for truth and openess.
Than you so much for having to courage and clarity of mind to tackle this "elephant in the room that no one will talk about"
This is the 21st century and secrets are getting harder to keep.
spaceman77777 1 year ago 6
A healthy democracy depends upon there being a healthy news media that is unfettered in it's quest for truth and openess.
Than you so much for having to courage and clarity of mind to tackle this "elephant in the room that no one will talk about"
This is the 21st century and secrets are getting harder to keep.
spaceman77777 1 year ago 4
the truth will set you free
marpoq 1 year ago
It is amazing to me that the real perpetrators got away with this rather poorly executed false flag. They have left their fingerprints all over this thing and never could produce a coherent "official theory". Never mind that one only has to look at the footage of the buildings coming down to know that it all a pack of lies.
Northern5tar 1 year ago
Great piece.
Anxiously awaiting the next installment.
ZedAlfa273 1 year ago 3
love you guys, shared, fav'd and thanks, no new news to 911 folks but closer to main stream and I can feel a ressurgence
huskerbird1 1 year ago
See YT video:
9-11 WTC Attacks Original Sound. Steve Vigilante
watch?v=vwKQXsXJDX4
This is a *new* very clear video posted a month ago. must see.
moreaudan 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
please remove this horrible video
truthofevolution 1 year ago
@truthofevolution why is it horrible?
cheddyrod 1 year ago
@cheddyrod because 9/11 conspiracies have been debunked over and over. It takes a tragedy and makes it into a farce.
truthofevolution 1 year ago
@truthofevolution to conspire means 2 or more people planning, so no matter what happened on 9/11 it was a conspiracy.
Their is nothing farcical about asking questions as to why a steel framed building fell at free fall speeds due to fire damage, that has huge ramifications.
What is wrong is believing that because it was a tragedy we should not ask questions but buy into whatever the media or government tell us. You may be able to suspend disbelief but inteligent, honest people cannot.
thenewvoice8 1 year ago
@thenewvoice8 actually i consider myself an intelligent and honest person and I think the whole thing is ridiculous considering the questions have already been soundly answered by experts who understand the subject better than anyone. They are not part of the government or media. And if you think they are working together to cook up such a complicated story, I dont know what to tell you.
truthofevolution 1 year ago
@thenewvoice8
There's a tremendous difference between skeptical and believing in dumbass theories that the vast majority of architects, engineers, and physics professionals disagree with.
TheAntiV 1 year ago
@truthofevolution This video was not about conspiracy theories. So why was it horrible?
cheddyrod 1 year ago
@cheddyrod yes it was. They guy says he doesnt know how the towers fell, as if that question hasnt been answered. It has. Hes just refusing to look. That sort of obfuscation is horrible.
truthofevolution 1 year ago
Comment removed
truthofevolution 1 year ago
@truthofevolution In what way was he trying to confuse the meaning? Where in this video did they discuss conspiracy theories?
cheddyrod 1 year ago
@cheddyrod When he says "we dont know what brought down the buildings" what does he mean? Well there is an official explanation that the planes brought the buildings down. I take it that he rejects this explanation. He is implying that something other than the planes brought it down. Thats conspiracy talk. Do you see now?
As I said they do not discuss it outright, but when they ask questions that were already answered, they are implying that they reject the answer.
truthofevolution 1 year ago
@truthofevolution You asked 'Do you see now'? I see your mind is closed. If you had taken some science courses in your life you might have a more investigative mind. When you use words like 'Berkeley guy' it tells me a lot about you! You are assuming that he is implying things because that is what you are thinking and not what he is saying. He did not mention conspiracy theory but YOU think he implied it.
cheddyrod 1 year ago
@cheddyrod Berkeley guy says "we dont know what brought the buildings down" yes we do. "we dont know who was on the planes" yes we do. Thats all conspiracy talk. They frame it that they are "just asking questions" to obfuscate this point.
truthofevolution 1 year ago
@truthofevolution man the guy is making a point about how obvious it is that planes hit some buildings and they went down, and thats the official story. when he says " we don't know what brought the buildings down" or what ever, he's talking about the fact of a cover up, which is what his book is about...
bolter22 1 year ago
@truthofevolution lol debunked mate look at the pentagon where is the plane !!
jakeman121acdc 1 year ago
i am subscribed to you guys, but apparently I agree with you on every issue except this. There is no debate raging amongst experts. There is only debate amongst people who have no idea what they are talking about. I can say the same about debate raging about whether HIV causes aids. There are almost no real experts who believe that.
This video is absolutely disappointing.
truthofevolution 1 year ago
@truthofevolution what about 1200 qualified architects & engineers for the 9/11 re-investigation? are they part of the group of people who u say don't know what they're talking about?
BOZ11 1 year ago
@troll Is that like that anti anthropogenic global warming petition of 31,000 oil shills claiming to be Phd's and accredited scientists, people like mickey mouse, brittany spears, and tom cruise??
OOH no those couple guys who came up with fake names to fill up a bogus petition with are cointel pro. Alex jones knows them, ask him for their cell numbers ;-D
watercup123456 1 year ago
"we don't know what brought the buildings down" - getting hit by an airplane.
"we don't know who was on the planes" - really? how do we not know?
Craigipedia 1 year ago
@hobatu the stock market was being rigged, gigantic metals market manipulation by JP Morgan. All the investigation files were in building 7.
Surprise.
ytgv3fc7 1 year ago
@sonicsuns jet fuel and impacts can't take down those towers, that's the conclusion every single time, especially not at free-fall speeds. Physically impossible. Only one detail can make it true: collapse from the supports all at once. Nothing else can make it happen. Jet fuel can't melt steel, GET SOME, melt some steel. Doesn't work. That's why we have this thing called "coking ovens" for melting / making steel
ytgv3fc7 1 year ago
@ytgv3fc7 Except PHYSICS concludes EVERY TIME that planes hitting buildings with all their jet fuel WILL cause structural collapse of buildings (also the towers DID NOT fall at free fall speed LEARN PHYSICS DUMMY).
Jet fuel didn't have to melt steel to cause a collapse. It only needed to warp it causing it to lose it's strength which in turn to caused structural failure of the buildings. Which is EXACTLY what happened, you can SEE the girders bending inward in all videos of the wtc buildings!
watercup123456 1 year ago
@watercup123456 Time the collapse which was about 9-10 seconds and calculate how far an object would have to be to fall at that speed. You'll get the height of towers. Besides, looking at the video of the impact, you'll see a huge fireball. That fireball was the jet fuel. But with all that said, I do believe the plane crashes caused the collapse of the towers.
PoisonWazTheCure 1 year ago
@PoisonWazTheCure,
The plane crashes could not have caused the collapse. If the damage was severe enough (which I doubt with just one jet liner), then perhaps the portion of the building would topple over. But that's not the case. The WT were meant to withstand multiple impacts of jet liners. These buildings came down at free fall speed. NOT NORMAL.
Hells2TheYea 1 year ago
@Hells2TheYea The buildings did not topple over because of one very good reason - gravity. The path of least resistance is straight down, not to the left or right, which is why the tops of the buildings from where the impact damage was sustained did not topple over, they collapsed inward as the bottom portion of the impact site gave away caving in on itself.
Meant to does not equal will.
So what about free fall? Doesn't matter how fast/slow they fell it doesn't prove bombs lameo :P
VERY NORMAL.
watercup123456 1 year ago
@watercup123456,
WTC2 was 2/3 unaffected by the hit. WTC1 was 4/5 unaffected. Only a small portion was damaged. Logic says that the building (if damaged enough in the section it was hit), it would topple over in the direction where the hole is. One of the buildings does this before it implodes on itself. The unaffected part of the buildings should not have caved in on itself. AT ALL. The collapse would go slower because of the resistance of the affected floors, not at free fall speed.
Hells2TheYea 1 year ago
@Hells2TheYea What the fuck are you babbling about?
Only a small portion needs to be damaged to cause a collapse. LEARN PHYSICS LEARN LOGIC!
No, it wouldn't topple over, I already explained why. The "hole", is all the way through, not just one side. LEARN PHYSICS.
There is no implosion, you are insane. LEARN PHYSICS.
The affected parts definitely should have caved in on themselves, otherwise I would start to doubt the theory of gravity! The collapse was not at free fall. LEARN PHYSICS!
watercup123456 1 year ago
@watercup123456 Hey watercup...does gravity cause all supports and trusts connecting to each floor to fail at exactly the same time? does gravity cause the core structure to fail first when 87 floors including the core was undamaged, does gravity cause near free fall collapse...myself as well as millions of others think NOT!
Sounds like your talking absolute bullshit watercup...or is that PISSPOT?
ousamadidndoit 1 year ago 9
@moron The supports didn't fail at the same time you fucking liar, they failed as the building fell on top of itself (and the core WAS damaged!) WATCH THE VIDEOS LIAR!
Yes gravity DOES cause the structure to fall straight down. I don't know what the fuck you are babbling about the core or some shit, LEARN PHYSICS!
E=mc^2 READ UP ON IT LOSER!
Nothing you say is in any way factual or logical, and bears no resemblance to what happened to the buildings on that day. What a fucking lying dip shit!
watercup123456 1 year ago
@watercup123456 here's some physics for you, maybe these facts will have a chance of penetrating your immense cranium.
/watch?v=rVCDpL4Ax7I
BOZ11 1 year ago
@troll Great job spamming the internet loser!
OOPS too bad moron liars with using photoshop and windows video editor doesn't equal evidence of bombs in buildings OR that you know physics!
watercup123456 1 year ago
@watercup123456 So what about free fall?Doesn't matter how fast/slow they fell it doesn't prove bombs lameo :P
VERY NORMAL.
HOW IS THAT NORMAL WHEN ITS NEVER HAPPENED BEFORE OR AFTER 9/11?
IS BUILDING 7,s COLLAPSE NORMAL AS WELL?
CAN ANYONE PROVIDE PROOF OF A STEEL FRAMED SKYSCRAPER EVER COLLAPSING DUE TO FIRE AND PLANE IMPACT, MYSELF AND MILLIONS OF OTHERS WOULD LOVE TO SEE IT.
When the truth comes out, there should be a round up of all shills...and they should be treated without mercy
ousamadidndoit 1 year ago
LOL 9/11 truthers OMFG ROFL
IF you had any "truth", it would have come out already!
watercup123456 1 year ago
@watercup123456 9 years after vietnam we did not know about the false flag attack of the gulf of tonkin incident which was used as justification for the vietnam war
BOZ11 1 year ago
@BOZ11 actually admitted it in only 2 yrs it just was,nt front page news
mikeoli 1 year ago
@mikeoli totally untrue. the false flag proving NSA documents were declassified in 2005.
BOZ11 1 year ago
@BOZ11 You are comparing two separate incidents.
Gulf of Tonkin does not equal bush did 9/11, and it ESPECIALLY does not equal bombs in buildings.
Did usa gov know about 9/11 and let usa be attacked? This is pretty much historical record. Did usa gov have a hand in (training/supporting/creating-planning operations/ etc) outside of simply engendering terrorism with it's own terrorist foreign policy? Highly unlikely but possible. Were there bombs in the buildings? No you idiot don't be absurd.
watercup123456 1 year ago
@watercup123456 none of what u said changes the fact that the public did not hear about the false flag gulf of tonkin incident that was used as justification for the vietnam war until the NSA declassified the documents in 2005; a full 41 years after the fact, never mind the 9 years that have elapsed since 9/11
BOZ11 1 year ago
@BOZ11 SO WHAT?
None of what you said HAS ANYTHING TO DO WITH 9/11 or any conspiracy theory made about the event (like bush doing it, bombs in buildings, etc.).
USE CRITICAL THINKING I CAN'T HOLD YOUR HAND ALL DAY ;-D
watercup123456 1 year ago
@watercup123456 inhale... exhale... there there.
venuecam 1 year ago
@troll Can't... Stop... Spamming...The... Internet... FUCK!
watercup123456 1 year ago
Comment removed
BOZ11 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@watercup123456 seems u can't follow the argument, so i'll recap. u said "IF you had any "truth", it would have come out already!"
It's been 9 years. The last time we had a false flag attack the government didn't own up until 41 years after the fact. Pattern of behaviour
BOZ11 1 year ago
@watercup123456 wait another 20 years when the files are declassified like usual. Until then let those who can see the truth speak the truth... shhhhhhhh
venuecam 1 year ago
@ramblin What the fuck are you babbling about. YES DO A GOOGLE SEARCH YES CHECK WIKIPEDIA YES CHECK FACTS CHECK SOURCES.
I don't need to check moron I read the books years ago OOPS ;-D
watercup123456 1 year ago
@loser How is that normal? To my knowledge MISSILES HAVE HIT PLENTY OF BUILDINGS AND THEY COLLAPSED AS A RESULT. Huge planes = missiles. You are fucking insane.
Yes building's 7 collapse IS NORMAL (when you LOOK at the MASSIVE DAMAGE 7 had instead of failing to ignore this FACT like a moron 9/11 "truther").
Building 7 had nearly it's whole face gouged out right down the middle by debris (but alex jones and loose change don't show you the pictures of THIS SIDE that was damaged). OOPS ;-D
watercup123456 1 year ago
@watercup123456 caps lock plus inanity is not a good substitute for argument. thou doth protest too much
BOZ11 1 year ago
@dumbass Proof that missile planes can take out buildings? How about you look to the first gulf war? Plenty of examples of munitions taking down buildings.
The cia taught the taliban fighters these techniques for a reason - they work. It was not the first time the wtc was attacked (and bombs COULD NOT bring the building down, there was not enough damage).
You saw it again with the second Iraq war - planes can take down buildings, just like missiles (b/c at that point, that is what they are).
watercup123456 1 year ago
Its funny, cause I used to follow alex jones and think there were bombs in the buildings too..
Until I LEARNED PHYSICS :-D
Until I RESEARCHED what aj and loose change were saying (to see if they were telling the truth - and they were NOT!).
Until I SAW THE DAMAGE TO BUILDING 7, the side/pics/ and vids aj and loose change won't show you (because it has MASSIVE DAMAGE), and anyone who sees this damage can easily know how and why it collapsed as it did.
They LIED to you (to make money).
watercup123456 1 year ago
@watercup123456 The world trade center was designed to withstand a direct hit of a jet plane, which when you see the fireball from the colision that was the fuel burning off , so. much for fuel. There was a building in Spain which was on fire for 5 days with a crane on it and the skeleton stands. The empire state bldg was hit by a bomber and it did not fall,. Every war was a false flag operation,
mikeoli 1 year ago 2
@mikeoli I fucking just said that "meant to" does not equal "will" or "does" withstand.
Many buildings are built to withstand this that and the other thing. In earthquake riddled zones they build buildings to withstand the earthquake.. But they still fall down when there is enough damage done.
THE FUCKING BUILDING WAS ON FIRE YOU MORON WATCH THE VIDEOS
I don't care how much jet fuel burnt off - BUILDINGS ON FIRE, YOU FUCKING IDIOT LOL
watercup123456 1 year ago
@watercup123456 all i see is "blah blah FUCKING IDIOT LOL ROFL MORON FIRE BUILDING RARR". Still can't see a cogent argument
BOZ11 1 year ago
@troll LEARN PHYSICS MORON!
watercup123456 1 year ago
@mikeoli Guess what dip shit? In spain NO FUCKING MISSILE PLANE HIT ANY BUILDING! OOPS There goes that fucking nonsense!
Learn to think and use logic K moron!
Many buildings have been hit by planes or missiles and did not fall.
And many MORE buildings have been hit by planes or missiles AND DID FALL.
You are comparing apples to toaster ovens. Which means you are a toolbox who never went to school. LEARN PHYSICS!
Every war was not a false flag YOU ARE A DUMB PARANOID PSYCHO SEEK HELP LOSER!
watercup123456 1 year ago
@watercup123456 do your homework. EVERY war fought related to British aristocracy that has been documented was financed on both sides by the largest banks on Earth. Including but not limited to Battle of Waterloo, American Civil War, WWI, WWII, Vietnam, Korea, Gulf, Afghanistan, Iraq, and soon to be Iran etc, etc, If you did your homework you would know that every war is a false flag event. Why? Cos wars create windfalls for economies :O Ask your grandparents how their economy boomed for WWII
venuecam 1 year ago
Comment removed
Hells2TheYea 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@watercup123456
BTW, the path of least resistance is most certainly not "straight down". That path would be the MOST resistance.
Hells2TheYea 1 year ago
@Hells2TheYea How is the path of least resistance NOT straight down?
Do you have ANY IDEA what gravity is and how it works????
Of course you don't. You think there were bombs in the buildings :-P
On earth, the path of least resistance will always be straight down. Gravity is pulling us toward the earth's center, not left or right.
The damage was not one side, it was straight through. Had it been one side, a toppling over WOULD have been likely. But it was not. PHYSICS!
watercup123456 1 year ago
@watercup123456
There are other things at work here besides gravity... You do know that right? I mean you do know physics, right? Let me refresh your memory.
The path of least resistance WOULD be straight down IF there was no resistance. And there wasn't b/c they fell at nearly free fall speed. The unaffected floors ( 4/5 of building 1& 2/3 of building 2) would SLOW DOWN the collapse because of FRICTION. Aka INERTIA. That's Physics.
Do you have any idea how common sense works?
Hells2TheYea 1 year ago
@Hells2TheYea You don't understand gravity. Go do a google search or something.
There is no way ANYONE could have known that the planes would have hit the towers (they could have just as easily missed), and that wtc 7 would have been hit by so much debris and be so badly damaged. In spite of this it still just so happened to be a controlled demolition.
Hows that common sense working out for you yet? Oh, you aren't using any. No fucking shit!
watercup123456 1 year ago
@watercup123456 So you tell ppl to do a google search and then abuse them for reading wikipedia. Check yourself.
venuecam 1 year ago 2
@watercup123456 remote controlled planes.
That was the nature of the other exercises running that day.
It's the same technology used to fly drones.
I'm sure you'd deny it, pretend there's no such thing.
Except we all know there are such things as drone helicopters and jet planes, it's been all over the news for many years.
Makes your coming denial dead in the water before your bullshit lips even open.
ytgv3fc7 1 year ago
@troll Now this dip shit was claiming the planes were remote controlled drones LOL
Those pilots just killed themselves when the plane took on a life of its own AHAHAHAHAHAHA OMFG ROFL
And then the pentagon crashed them into the ocean or something, lets not use the actual planes for the actual terrorist mission now ROFL HOLY FUCK YOU ARE INSANE!
You don't know what the fuck you are babbling about!
What a paranoid insane loser. Thanks for ruining any shred of credibility you never had ;-D
watercup123456 1 year ago
@Hells2TheYea You are a liar and you have no fucking clue what you are babbling about. None of the buildings sustained free fall speed for any long period. From wiki "In the case of both towers, the top section tilted towards the face that had buckled, behaving largely as a solid block separate from the rest of the building. It fell at least one story in freefall and impacted the lower sections with a force equivalent to over thirty times its own weight."
watercup123456 1 year ago
@watercup123456 This video shows a demolition SIDE BY SIDE with WTC 7. IDENTICAL timing action. YOU are a dirty liar and a fraud and should shut your dirt-eating liar mouth.
watch?v=73qK4j32iuo
Your "buckling" is a FICTIONAL STATEMENT, NEVER DID HAPPEN.
Shame on you. SHAME. Go hang yourself, improve the planet's IQ
ytgv3fc7 1 year ago
@troll Well, nothing more need be said to a LYING TROLL who claims buckling of the buildings never happened WHEN YOU CAN SEE IT HAPPEN ON VIDEO YOU FUCKING LIAR OMFG ROFL
How fucking stupid are you?
You REALLY think childish lies like this will actually work? What a fucking loser!
Keep spamming the internet troll you got PWNED!
watercup123456 1 year ago
@Hells2TheYea "This was sufficient to buckle the columns of the story immediately below it; the block then fell freely through the distance of another story.Total collapse was now unavoidable as the process repeated through the entire height of the lower sections.The force of each impact was also much greater than the horizontal momentum of the section, which kept the tilt from increasing significantly before the falling section reached the ground."
watercup123456 1 year ago
@Hells2TheYea "It remained intact throughout the collapse, with its center of gravity within the building's footprint. After crushing the lower section of the building, it was itself crushed when it hit the ground... [On WTC 7] NIST explains that fire was the main reason for the collapse, along with lack of water to fight the fire. Fires continued to burn throughout the afternoon on the lower floors. At 5:20 p.m. a critical column buckled, leading to the collapse of floor 13, "
watercup123456 1 year ago