take a pencil, coil a wire around it a bunch of times, stick one end on the positive terminal on your starter, and ground the other to your frame. Youll get 8% better gas mileage. Quick way to change the frequency of the motor. Also, in any modern stock motor, only burns about 20-30% of the gas it gets... There are 2 sparks in a cycle, the second ignites the negative energy, imploding it, causing the piston to be sucked back up for the next cycle.
@Djonemore they're designed to be a lot more effecient and keep the engine in the right powerband for the right situation. u can hardly notice the shifting too and the shifting is a lot smoother than of a camaro
I wasnt suprised at all about the 0-60time, more about the 0-100 time of about 29sec. I was watching this and when the view went to the outside i was thinking "damn im going to miss the 0-100 time" then when it went back to the speedo it still wasnt at 100 and i was like "wtf?" But in anycase you can pick one of these up for a gand or so and its cheap Rwd fun.
@IROCwarriorAMC88 Yeah but... For the same price of the V8 4th Gen, you can turbocharge or sc the V6 and Come up w roughly the same speed and accel. IDK about how the whole reliable thing would go over then though, better off with a supercharged V6
@wcbrookinz101 No you wouldn't you would have to pay someone to retune your pcm, and a S/C will add more drag on an engine and will cause the reliability to go down. Why do you think performance cars and make and manufacturers have a 3yr/36,000 mile warranty compared to a reliable fuel economy's car that has a 10 year/100k warranty. Performance cost money. Also you may get the same speed and accel but the power bands between the two are way different(night and day)
@wcbrookinz101 also after doing all that performance upgrades on a V6 good luck on our trans lasting and drive shaft not snapping. Those flimsy two piece drive shafts are crap and a V6 T5 and V6 4L60-E are not built the same as a V8s transmission. The V8 transmissions have stronger flex plates and TC and clutches to handle the more tq
@IROCwarriorAMC88 tb work with supporting mods will help. i have a 3.4 bird with cai catless exhaust msd ignition and tb work, i was running 10.7 at the track then i put on a set of taylor 8.2 mm wires and and did tb work and was down to a 10.48. still slow but a lil less slow :)
@6453103 Actually no this 3.4L is a L32 V6 compared to the LA1 or the LQ1 you are referring to. Completely different engines bud. The whole top ends of each engine is different especially the LQ1 which is a Dual Over Head Cam(DOHC) compared to the other two which are a CIB.
@GPVlog They didn't put the 3.8L in at the time because GM didn't have it in production for a RWD platform yet. You may say that had a 3.8L in the 85 vGrand National but that is a completely different engine than the L36 series two 3.8L which produces a lot less emissions which all the big auto makers were trying to do at the time was lower emissions like CO2, HC, NOX,CO,etc... for the mandated OBD2 set by the Government. That is why this L32 3.4L drop off the face of the earth in 96 with the
Agreed, everyone thinks chevy sb normal gains when they do these mods, but in reality you gotta go farther to get half as much. Not really a bad thing, takes more, but you learn more. Also, stock injectors pretty much max you out at 160hp, otherwise you start leaning out. I'd recommend a fuel pressure regulator and bump up the psi a few pounds, but only after you get more air into the engine. Pretty good mod is the 3400/3500 upper swap, but you gotta change pistons too.
how much did you pay for the superchip, and isnt the flowmaster a performance part, i think you forgot to add the hp of that, stock v6 camaro dont have flowmasters right?
@ricksmiths10 bro doubtful a good driver in one of these who knows how to shift can do 0-60 in about 6 seconds stock Least I can most people dont know how to get good starts with manuals. and I had altima before they arnt faster than these. besides 110 is about all your altima will do lol.
a stock 98 altima with 2.4L does 0-60 in 8.4 - 8.7 sec
v6 camaro's weight to HP ratio is 20.94 lbs per HP
98 altima's weight to HP ratio is 19.02 lbs per HP
and as far as top speed goes, neither one of the cars is gonna hit it on a 1/4 mile track.............so yea my altima is faster then ur v6 camaro and i can fit 5 people in comfortable and u cant! so suck it!
@feeblemind really i had owned a 95 3.4 with cam, piston, lifter and header upgrade with dual flowmaster and cold air intake and was barely running that, hell my 97 firebird 3.8 with dual flowmaster, intake, and perf. chip is running around 6 secs. if your gonna talk down on a car atleast know the truth about your own first, a 95 3.4 5 speeds 0-60 time is roughly 9 secs even with a perfect launch. nice try bud
get a real stick shift instead of a auto and then youll get to 100 withen 14 seconds (tested and proved on a drag strip with V6 3.4 1994 camaro STOCK)
Id rather have an auto that way i wouldnt have to worry about blowing up my motor if i accidently throw it in first whilst meaning to put it into third
@loverhina I would like to see this casue he/she would need an aftermarket fly wheel and posi traction for this and who is to say this car wasn't power programmed IDK man iam not trying to be a dick but Lt1s stock run low 14s and they have 275hp comepared to 160 for 3.4
True, but like you said, people dont buy 3.8's for power. And like I said, I didn't pay anything for mine so I'm perfectly happy with it. If I want power I'll get an LT1 or LS1....
While I am a big fan of power, power isn't everything. And since I got it for free I aint complaining. And if you like power so much, why are you watching this? And btw I'm sure if you met someone that has an ls7 he'd tell you that ls1's suck. Just something to think about. :)
1995. it was my dads for ten years. i was waiting so long for my dad to give me the car. he finally gave it to me at the age of 19 last year, and he bought him self a cx7. i have some vids of it if you want to see. you should also join camaro5 'com or camarofuroms 'com
nice dude i got a 95 firebird 5 speed i feel as tho the 5 speed might make them a lot quicker tho. idk ill have to race my friend tht has the same set up as u. btw whats modded on ur car
my 95 3.4 has some good top end that and a 5 spd really brings out the power in them but yeah man good shit i think mine is a little bit faster than yours from 65-100+ but still man i cant hate on another chevy is it stock??
not bad for 150k+
merkkraft4 5 days ago
take a pencil, coil a wire around it a bunch of times, stick one end on the positive terminal on your starter, and ground the other to your frame. Youll get 8% better gas mileage. Quick way to change the frequency of the motor. Also, in any modern stock motor, only burns about 20-30% of the gas it gets... There are 2 sparks in a cycle, the second ignites the negative energy, imploding it, causing the piston to be sucked back up for the next cycle.
MrTex1987 9 months ago
I just brought my 1994 3.4 Camaro, It is going to be FUN driving that car,, I love the look, and engine sound, it is very Bad A&&
Duddie82 11 months ago
Man, I love the long gears they put in these things, not like todays 6-7 autos that are constantly shifting....
Djonemore 1 year ago
@Djonemore they're designed to be a lot more effecient and keep the engine in the right powerband for the right situation. u can hardly notice the shifting too and the shifting is a lot smoother than of a camaro
carsnwomen91 11 months ago
I wasnt suprised at all about the 0-60time, more about the 0-100 time of about 29sec. I was watching this and when the view went to the outside i was thinking "damn im going to miss the 0-100 time" then when it went back to the speedo it still wasnt at 100 and i was like "wtf?" But in anycase you can pick one of these up for a gand or so and its cheap Rwd fun.
circlelt1 1 year ago
Comment removed
circlelt1 1 year ago
@IROCwarriorAMC88 Yeah but... For the same price of the V8 4th Gen, you can turbocharge or sc the V6 and Come up w roughly the same speed and accel. IDK about how the whole reliable thing would go over then though, better off with a supercharged V6
wcbrookinz101 1 year ago
@wcbrookinz101 No you wouldn't you would have to pay someone to retune your pcm, and a S/C will add more drag on an engine and will cause the reliability to go down. Why do you think performance cars and make and manufacturers have a 3yr/36,000 mile warranty compared to a reliable fuel economy's car that has a 10 year/100k warranty. Performance cost money. Also you may get the same speed and accel but the power bands between the two are way different(night and day)
Smokie420ish 3 months ago
@wcbrookinz101 also after doing all that performance upgrades on a V6 good luck on our trans lasting and drive shaft not snapping. Those flimsy two piece drive shafts are crap and a V6 T5 and V6 4L60-E are not built the same as a V8s transmission. The V8 transmissions have stronger flex plates and TC and clutches to handle the more tq
Smokie420ish 3 months ago
man i wish i had my old 3.4
Cameron32391 1 year ago
@IROCwarriorAMC88 tb work with supporting mods will help. i have a 3.4 bird with cai catless exhaust msd ignition and tb work, i was running 10.7 at the track then i put on a set of taylor 8.2 mm wires and and did tb work and was down to a 10.48. still slow but a lil less slow :)
jdm0avy 1 year ago
Why didnt they put the 3.8 in these back then?
GPVlog 1 year ago
@GPVlog The 3.4 was cheaper to make, since that's what the olds and other chevy cars had.
6453103 1 year ago
@6453103 Actually no this 3.4L is a L32 V6 compared to the LA1 or the LQ1 you are referring to. Completely different engines bud. The whole top ends of each engine is different especially the LQ1 which is a Dual Over Head Cam(DOHC) compared to the other two which are a CIB.
Smokie420ish 3 months ago
@GPVlog They didn't put the 3.8L in at the time because GM didn't have it in production for a RWD platform yet. You may say that had a 3.8L in the 85 vGrand National but that is a completely different engine than the L36 series two 3.8L which produces a lot less emissions which all the big auto makers were trying to do at the time was lower emissions like CO2, HC, NOX,CO,etc... for the mandated OBD2 set by the Government. That is why this L32 3.4L drop off the face of the earth in 96 with the
Smokie420ish 3 months ago
@GPVlog 3.8L L36 series 2
Smokie420ish 3 months ago
Thats an automatic. My 90 year old grandma could do that
mevalesgorro 1 year ago
@IROCwarriorAMC88
None taken its not fast, just reliable...
Alldaysteve1 1 year ago
@IROCwarriorAMC88
Agreed, everyone thinks chevy sb normal gains when they do these mods, but in reality you gotta go farther to get half as much. Not really a bad thing, takes more, but you learn more. Also, stock injectors pretty much max you out at 160hp, otherwise you start leaning out. I'd recommend a fuel pressure regulator and bump up the psi a few pounds, but only after you get more air into the engine. Pretty good mod is the 3400/3500 upper swap, but you gotta change pistons too.
thomasstodgell23 1 year ago
how much did you pay for the superchip, and isnt the flowmaster a performance part, i think you forgot to add the hp of that, stock v6 camaro dont have flowmasters right?
newmanto03 1 year ago
i like the no seatbelt light
TrueFear94 1 year ago
Slow as fuck for a 3.4, even European cars with 1.6 4cyl. engines can be faster...
GenThorPaulus 1 year ago
what a slow piece of crap
coltonwithano 1 year ago
Your 98 altima is slow and looks stupid
inflamessucks 1 year ago
r u serious?!?!?!
my 98 altima wit 2.4l i4 does 0-110 faster then this and it has absolutely no upgrades!
ricksmiths10 2 years ago
@ricksmiths10 bro doubtful a good driver in one of these who knows how to shift can do 0-60 in about 6 seconds stock Least I can most people dont know how to get good starts with manuals. and I had altima before they arnt faster than these. besides 110 is about all your altima will do lol.
feeblemind 1 year ago
@feeblemind dude i have done it faster then this specific car in this video! idk abt other camaro's
ricksmiths10 1 year ago
@feeblemind R U FUCKING KIDDING ME! its a v6
a stock 94 v6 camaro does 0-60 in 9.6 - 10 sec
a stock 98 altima with 2.4L does 0-60 in 8.4 - 8.7 sec
v6 camaro's weight to HP ratio is 20.94 lbs per HP
98 altima's weight to HP ratio is 19.02 lbs per HP
and as far as top speed goes, neither one of the cars is gonna hit it on a 1/4 mile track.............so yea my altima is faster then ur v6 camaro and i can fit 5 people in comfortable and u cant! so suck it!
ricksmiths10 1 year ago
@ricksmiths10 LOL U MAD?! and your horribly wrong bro its not even funny.
feeblemind 1 year ago
@feeblemind oh im wrong huh? show me were it says that a stock 1994 camaro v6 can do 0-60 in 6 secs!...................im waiting
ricksmiths10 1 year ago
@feeblemind im still waiting
ricksmiths10 1 year ago
@feeblemind it takes u 2 weeks to find something?
ricksmiths10 1 year ago
@feeblemind really i had owned a 95 3.4 with cam, piston, lifter and header upgrade with dual flowmaster and cold air intake and was barely running that, hell my 97 firebird 3.8 with dual flowmaster, intake, and perf. chip is running around 6 secs. if your gonna talk down on a car atleast know the truth about your own first, a 95 3.4 5 speeds 0-60 time is roughly 9 secs even with a perfect launch. nice try bud
anarchysoldier90 1 year ago
@ricksmiths10 thats funny cuz back when my camaro was stock just exhaust and intake i pulled my buddys 93 240sx sr20 swap. sorry to burst ur bubble.
quiksixx95 1 year ago
yeah wat is the top speed??
sctflasher379 2 years ago
whats the top speed on the 3.L v6s?.. 1995
SwagLiltXL 2 years ago
@SwagLiltXL i swapped out the computer and dash in my 95 and ran 140, but the transmission wasnt meant to run that hard so i backed off it
anarchysoldier90 1 year ago
there is absolutely no way this car runs 12s...now i am being rude ;)
isphius 2 years ago
Talkin about my 12GTP homes...
Alldaysteve1 2 years ago
oh ok
isphius 2 years ago
hp??
kabeto001 2 years ago
Around 200hp I like to think with the AC delete 160 stat K&N TB mods No cat and Jet stage 2 chip I should have picked up around 40 for everything.
Alldaysteve1 2 years ago
not worth 40 hp. These motors gain 40 hp from head/cam/headers not just a few bolt ons. Not trying to be rude just letting you know
isphius 2 years ago
If not, really close like I said around 200hp if not maybe 190Hp but I know no less.
stock 160
No cat 10
Jet chip 15
K&N 5
TB work/ AC delete 5
Alldaysteve1 2 years ago
Did you even tune your ecm.
Smokie420ish 2 years ago
Lol looks like SOMEONE isnt whearing his/her seatbelt! Rofl
debrajl529 2 years ago
get a real stick shift instead of a auto and then youll get to 100 withen 14 seconds (tested and proved on a drag strip with V6 3.4 1994 camaro STOCK)
loverhina 2 years ago
Id rather have an auto that way i wouldnt have to worry about blowing up my motor if i accidently throw it in first whilst meaning to put it into third
Chris7Shuman 2 years ago
@loverhina I would like to see this casue he/she would need an aftermarket fly wheel and posi traction for this and who is to say this car wasn't power programmed IDK man iam not trying to be a dick but Lt1s stock run low 14s and they have 275hp comepared to 160 for 3.4
Smokie420ish 2 years ago
alright ill get my time ticket for you next time im at the track man =) and why would you be a dick for for saying you dont believe me
loverhina 2 years ago
Some ppl get offensive and do you have a t5 or a4 tranny and alright sounds good.
Smokie420ish 2 years ago
8 seconds for 0-60 @_@
from 0:25 to 0:33
kaganader 2 years ago
dude im sorry but thats pretty slow... my 3,800 pound t-bird is faster than that..
iCruzeTBird559 2 years ago
It is what it is man
Alldaysteve1 2 years ago
True, but like you said, people dont buy 3.8's for power. And like I said, I didn't pay anything for mine so I'm perfectly happy with it. If I want power I'll get an LT1 or LS1....
debrajl529 2 years ago
Even then an LS1 would need some mods if its from the 90's to keep up with a gtp with minor bolt ons.
Alldaysteve1 2 years ago
While I am a big fan of power, power isn't everything. And since I got it for free I aint complaining. And if you like power so much, why are you watching this? And btw I'm sure if you met someone that has an ls7 he'd tell you that ls1's suck. Just something to think about. :)
debrajl529 2 years ago
i got my 3.4 for free too! lol
305pride 2 years ago
Sweet! What year?
debrajl529 2 years ago
1995. it was my dads for ten years. i was waiting so long for my dad to give me the car. he finally gave it to me at the age of 19 last year, and he bought him self a cx7. i have some vids of it if you want to see. you should also join camaro5 'com or camarofuroms 'com
305pride 2 years ago
Okay.....I have no problem with your opinion but I can tell you that a lot of people are going to disagree with you....
debrajl529 2 years ago
nice dude i got a 95 firebird 5 speed i feel as tho the 5 speed might make them a lot quicker tho. idk ill have to race my friend tht has the same set up as u. btw whats modded on ur car
moparman4391 2 years ago
idk...i think id rather go with a 4.3L v6...cam it up...you could do just as much...fuck that jet chip shit
redskinsfan222 2 years ago
Takeoff was from 25 secs stopped at 33secs . Do the math.
lazarogomo 2 years ago
0-60 8.38 not bad for such a heavy car with not a lot of power, think about it .
lazarogomo 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
thats ok but check out my 100+.lol..........150mph
michaelray1969 2 years ago
I have a 96 3.8L camaro that looks almost exactly like yours. Only the speedo on mine goes up to 120 instead of 110.
debrajl529 2 years ago
its a good thing you have a GTP too ;) I think I woke up when you hit 100 lol
lurch1489 2 years ago
its only a v6
nationsmotive 2 years ago
I realize that, I'm just being a pest.
JDMGTP 2 years ago
my 95 3.4 has some good top end that and a 5 spd really brings out the power in them but yeah man good shit i think mine is a little bit faster than yours from 65-100+ but still man i cant hate on another chevy is it stock??
xr200r2002 2 years ago
Put on the seatbelt hahaha
Ultimatebrownstuff 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
Ultimatebrownstuff 2 years ago
not bad, good vid
truckinbig 2 years ago
top end on the 3.4 sucks. sry just had to say ive never taken my 96 3800 over 70 but it got there quick without ever goin over 3,000 (5spd)
Theautotech 3 years ago
i have a 94 3.4 camaro with 42,000 miles and i love driving it
bergercw 3 years ago