Added: 1 year ago
From: ChessVibes
Views: 14,315
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (20)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • is there a rule that says you can't use both your hands? I'm asking this because I haven't seen anyone do it. When I play w/ the clock on the left side, I always move the pieces w/ my right hand and tap the clock with my left hand. (all amateur games, of course) Is this against the rules?

  • @themelc Yes. You must use the same hand to press the clock as the hand you used to move the piece. You can't use both hands. It's an actual rule. I've seen some people do it before, and it's always called as being illegal. For amateur games, i don't think they care that much. But if it's tournament or pro game, then yeah. You will be penalized(not sure what the penalty is though).

  • At 7.00 why not Re7, making double rooks with pinned Bishop. If Bishop takes Bishop at e4 then Rxe4 gaining defence and attack on pawn?

  • @rocco7050 Because after black captures the d5 pawn, white can't capture anything to compensate (g7 in the video), so white would be 2 pawns down and thus pretty much screwed.

  • I want to get that lint off from nakamura's sweater!!!

  • this is the perfect camera angle to shoot blitz, and you can read the clock clearly. nice work.

  • Comment removed

  • Why don't they use both hands?

  • @MrRazorblade999 its a rule to hit the clock with same hand as moves the pieces

  • As smyslov once said on the subject of more youthful opponents in blitz games " If they are young, talented but NERVOUS you have a chance, but when they are young, talented, and FEARLESS!, you're usually cooked!"

  • @Ziggy2016 same... i think its something about the old regime stoicism vs the young gun brawling agression

  • Ok, forget that last post. If Kramnik takes on a7, then black just plays Rook(d5) to d1 ch after which black would just win the rook on a7. Well, for an instant in time, I thought I might've seen something that they missed. But it was just a blunder on my part.

  • @charlesfloyb Can't Nakamura just take on a7 anyway? How does he lose a rook after, even considering what you said? Are you looking at the same position? 7:51

    Ie Kramnik takes a7 pawn with rook, Nakamura takes rook back with a4 rook(now up a full rook), and then what's Kramnik going to do? If Rg5+ Skewer, then Ke4 protecting the rook, and it's 2 rooks vs 1.. if Kramnik takes on Rd5, then king takes and black is up a whole rook. Naka can even Kxg4.. and be up a pawn. No Rxa7 ever..

  • @ex0duzz Right. Kramnik can't take the pawn on a7 or he loses a rook. All Nakamura has to do is check on d1 saving his unprotected rook, then recapture on a7 and Nakamura is up a rook. So you're right, " No Rxa7 ever..".

  • @charlesfloyb Sorry to 'beat a dead horse' so to speak(no offense intended), but Naka doesn't even need to do a check. His rook isn't being attacked until Kramnik played Rg5+ which was supported by the pawn. This is at 7:51. He plays the Rg5+ check at 7:53. So there's no chance to play Rxa7 anywhere, and there's no need for Naka to play Rd1+ ever.. If Kramnik DID play Rxa7 at 7:51 instead of Rg5, then takes and Kramniks c and f pawn are going to fall, and it's even easier endgame.

  • At the 7:51 marker, I thought Kramnik should've played RXa7. Black would've had to recapture the rook on a7 with his rook on a4. Then Kramnik would simply take the rook on d5. This would make the ending rook&2 pawns vs. rook&2 pawns with good drawing chances for Kramnik.

  • Amazing!!

  • Nothing like blitz to get the blood boiling.

  • Naka is a BEAST.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more