Added: 4 years ago
From: maxishine
Views: 79,767
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (724)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Ok crysis running at 30fps

    No point even playing that game

  • What???

    On a 19" (1280x1024) monitor a resolution from 1680x1050 ???

    OMG!!!

    Crysis windowed maybe(1024x768) only 30FPS???

    Very slowly! xD

  • Dude you got serous problems with your setup. On my tri sli gtx 280 setup same settings except running 16x antialliasing I'm getting min 76fps max 124. And I know my mobo has problems...

  • lol got 1 hd5870 and play this bench with very hich full hd 1920x1080 und 4 times AA und 8 times AF with above 30 fps xD

  • - resolution: 1680x1050

    - all very high (patched)

    - no AA

    79 FPS average!!

    ati radeon 5970

  • you can't compare a 5970 with a 8800..

    it when i compare you with chuck norris..

    it doesen't work..

  • vous-avez raison

  • you're right

  • maxishine you rule will you adopt me

  • loooool this vid is from 08 so your comment is totaly pointless

  • man low fps thanks to windowed mode

  • I want to know how good three 9800 GTX+ in tri sli would be on a 1440 x 900 resolution

  • almost perfect....

  • And your right, i bought my third 9800 GTX+ it runs flawlessly. :)

  • I come from the future to tell you I have DirectX 79 - I can almost run Crysis on the highest settings. Be patient my friends.

  • dude a $400 card can run crysis on highest.

  • dude my card is $78and can run crysis on highest avg 30fps (without AA)

  • what res?

  • 1280x800 and with 8xAA i have about 25 fps :D (ati radeon saphire HD4830 512mb)

  • i highly doubt that show proof post a video of you doing a benchmark

  • the benchmark doesnt work becouse it just starts the game (loading)(press any key to contiu) and then it just starts the cutscene

  • either your bullshitting to hide your lie or just dl a different bench tool

  • i could only find this one (in the vid) butit doesnt work i have no aa a stable 30fps andwith 8aaabout 25fps butmy res isnot so high its not 1680x1050 if irun it like thati have about 10-15fps

  • so now you say it works, make up your mind post your score

  • no i have that ingame (damn your stupid)

  • your calling me stupid when you cant even google crysis benchmark programs you get like 10 of them

  • whosays i use google :\

  • @ NoTaTtHiScHoOl

    Man, my 260 must be from the future then, because I can already run it on the highest--- and I'm only running DX10!

  • What cards?

  • i have watched like 100's of videos with the word benchmark in the title but i still dont know what it means.

  • lol? look it up!

  • Comment removed

  • Keep watching.

  • I got a

    Intel Quad 3.00 GHz

    XFX GeForce 9800GT

    4 Gig ram

    on vista

    can i drive Crysis on ultra ?

  • well maybe but at a lower resolution

  • bo but high xP

  • yes, i have Quad 2,5GHz, 4850, 4 GB RAM and Ultra settings on 1280x1024 = average 25+ FPS

  • What do you benchmark it with?

  • I can't wait to get a Core i7 and switch back to XP. Graphics and RAM already good. But even an average Quad would do heaps better in Crysis than my shitty 2.33 Core2 Duo.

  • You do realize that windows xp and vista 32 bit have a 3gb ram restriction right? probably not a good idea to go with xp

  • Yes, but Vista's performance drags behind all the other OS's. Same specs between a Vista and XP computer, XP will run faster, way faster. Besides, I'll probably alter my BIOS to handle 4GB RAM anyway.

  • you cant alter your bios to handle 4gb of ram on a 32 bit system.

  • Yes you can. Loads of people do it. 4GB is the most that 32bit can handle, Windows 32bit can only handle 3 or what ever it is, but it's not 32bit that limiting it to that, it's Windows. That's why some people get 64bit, it can run over 4GB and doesn't require being altered.

  • you cant...its not the bios that is incompatible with the 4gb of ram its the os you would have to alter the os to handle the 4gb of ram which like i said you wont be able to.

  • you could put 4GB of RAM in a pc with XP 32bit, but it would only recognise 3GB of RAM not 4GB.

    And CRYSIS73 is right, its not the bios that would need to be altered, it would be the OS that would need to be altered to manage 4GB RAM.

  • @ Freshbott2:

    Lol, fail. 32 bit can only address 3.2 Gb of memory. However, this includes RAM, CPU Cache, and VRAM.

    That's why XP 32 bit only sees 1.7 of my 2 GB.

    And wtf are you 3-way SLIing? I get that performance on a single 260. :/

  • It can go to four, not by default. But meh.

  • Comment removed

  • on a single 260. so like....u shit where your mouth is

  • JOIN MY HAMACHI NETWORK FOR THESE GAMES

    NETWORK IS:

    FARCRY 2 AND CRYSIS

    (TYPE AS IT IS SPACES AND CAPS LOCK ON OR OFF AS SPECIFIED)

    THE PASSWORD IS:

    password1

  • low fps on 3 way sli!:O 2 9800gtx have avarage 35:P

  • maxishine has 3 30" monitors, why dont you look at some of his videos instead?

  • What poor Triple-sli...

  • you cannot get tri sli

  • sorry, i just looked into this and realiesd you can

  • lol, why would you come to that conclusion?

  • i don't understand soz

  • thats a crappy monitor

  • Windowed mode brings down fps does it not?

  • everyone bitch and complained about crysis being too demanding. I am very pleased at what they have done. I think games like crysis are what is pushing intel ati nvida and amd. They see the goal and they are trying to surpass it.

  • so dissapointed about the poor peformance

  • Yea thats possible if its not tri sli. I would check tiger direct, newegg, and micro center for parts. I just build id say about a 1200 system and its bad ass man. I got the new i7 and 6gig of ddr3 all wrapped up in a antec 1200 case with the gtx 9800 black edition 1gig on board ddr3 ram gpu. I run linux most of the time unless gaming so its crazy fast in ubuntu and sabyaon. Vista is ok i quess still slower then linnux and mac and still very hungry.

  • I am building a kick ass gaming computer 2, it might not be ass good as yours but...... It will be less thank 100$ thats for sure lol GOOD JOB!

  • your building a pc for less then 100$ ok so your getting what a MB and that it??

  • i ment 1000$ not 100$ lol ^_^

  • That will still be hard to do. your talking tri sli so that right there is going to be like 500 plus and then a mb that supports it will be like 250 plus and then a tower, optical drive, ram, hard drive, and processor i dont see it happening man.

  • its not tri sli... Just saying that i was building a pretty good gaming computer for my friend running around 1000$ ^_^

  • i ment to say less than 1000$ not 100$ lol

  • whith car to buy???Nvidea 9800gt 1gb or Ati radeon HD4850 512mb???

  • What games will you be playing?

  • call of duty .... gta 4 ... brothers in arms...

    everything

  • Get the 4850. Will rape the 9800GT in most games

  • For sure its better than the 9800Gt

    Its even better than the 9800GTX and it beats the 9800GTX+ in most games.

  • FUCK

  • Some one plz send a message on how to get into free mode camra

  • literally impossable

  • Nvidia Quadro ?

  • not for gaming

  • Well my friend, here's your problem: your third Ultra isn't being used lol; Tri Sli doesn't work with the Ultras hahaha

  • yes it does, why do you think the 3-way sli bridge is compatable with them?

  • 30 FPS is bad for Tri-SLI lol :/

  • only if your computer sucks balls.

  • You must be an idiot if you think Vista is shit now...

  • it is shit slow..lol

  • my XP is slower than my vista

    Vista Basic comp:

    CPU-2.0GHz

    RAM-1GB

    XP Proffesional Comp:

    2.5GHz

    1GB

  • you need vista for 3 way sli.

  • one word.

    nice

  • I have with my ATI 4870x2, 40-70 FPS with all details on wery hight and antialising 16x :) 4870 x2 - the best

  • yeah at 640x480 :D

  • Retro, I'd believe it. I have two 4850s that can do about 30fps on Very High at 1600x1200 with an AMD quad at 2.8GHz. If koz has a wolfdale or something at 4GHz it's very possible with his 4870X2.

  • @ kozifire

    what resolution?

  • no i agree with you kozzy, i run crysis 1920/1200 with 2x8800gt's/q6600 watercooled/oc with everything on very high and 4xaa/16xaf etc etc, and i get simmilar fps to what your talking about, i dont know what this guy did wrong with his benchmark, any 3way sli or otherwise should be much more rewarding then 27 fps :<

  • I think he forgot to turn on his second and third card or he didnt configure his bios right because you should be able to do this on just one card.

  • or mabye its cause the video is 8months old? Drivers mate. They Mature over time. We all know that Ati+Nvidia also ahve crap drivers in the first few months.

  • u mean ATI have crap driver.s..

  • Unlikely, I have 2 4870x2's in CrossfireX, and I get about 68 fps average. So no, you don't.

    Unless like my buddy here said, on minimum res. I'm talking about 1900X1200.

  • I know that resolution is a little higher than what I have, 1440 by 900, but come on, that seems week for triple SLI, I got low to mid 30s with a single card, a Q6600, and 4GB of RAM. The thing I don't like about benchmarking is that it makes excessive writes to the hard drive, which can add a small latency. Cool video, though.

  • Hes probably some noob that has a weak processor and FSB and prob doesnt have his shit defraged (pata ftl) plus hes using vista =O

  • well was a weak processor lol

    he fryed that 1 with overclocking lol

    his new vids are good though

  • dude shut up vista is not bad is better and just wait until they make an update that will pwn XPs speed.

  • Lol vistard has made me have to reinstall it 4 times..... i have even emailed microsoft and they give me fuck all answers back just "contact our knowledge base"

  • they already did fool. sp1 ring a bell. vista blows crooked dick

  • actually SP1 was for a bit of hardware compatibility issues, SP2 will be for speed and more software compatibility

  • why cant you do 16 AA ?

  • Hi just wanted to know which case you used for three gtx 280s?

    Also did you use water cooling?

  • He's using three 8800 Ultras, not GTX280s...

    He's also using Swiftec liquid cooling.

    It clearly states this in the beginning.

  • its easy just buy a case and motherboard and power supply from tigerdirect or something then buy all the other stuff and start installing them onto ur motherboard and install ur motherboard and stuff on it to the power supply( then after ur done put the operating system disk in windows xp or something) then install the operating system and ur done( its usually cheaper building pc)

  • lol, Ati Radeon 4870 gets 40 fps without overclock. (OWN)

  • can anyone help me when i try to run a benchmark on Crysis it starts the first level of the game as if ive just clicked new game. any suggestions?

  • need help,, bought a core 2 duo 3.00 Ghz but when i look at CPU-Z its just 2.00 Ghz per core,,, wtf???

  • turn off any power saving features, then look again

  • I don't know exactly what you are talking about but that might be speedstep. Go google intel speedstep and read a bit on the subject.

    (reply to SOCerberus94)

  • there's just one problem: Vista

  • I have dual 8800GTs (XXX edition) and I get the same fps (27) but on 1280x1024.

  • why can't microsoft release dx 10 for windows XP?

  • theres some hacked dx10 drivers floating around that work with xp google it.

  • cause they try to make ppl buy vista lol

  • Vista is the future, get on board before your whole machine becomes uncompatible. Every game next year will be vista so I hope you enjoy being stuck with no super-sweet graphics :).

  • i know but if u got a old dying 6600gt the aero interface might lag it i dunno

  • yeh you are right that there are backwards compatability issues, but I got a new PC a year ago so it's components are all from 2006 - onwards. I've neverhad to go through the vista upgrade because it was the stock O/S for my machine.

  • how can i run the benchmark plz?

  • dl it

  • haw much do did they cost?

  • I hope Maxishine knows that response time in moniters contributes to frame rates. Apple Cinema displays have 16ms response time, not a very good GAMING moniter. Also you would get better framerates if Crysis wasn't poorly optimized. lol expect Crysis Warhead to have better optimization.

  • Crysis is overrated. All it is is a benchmark game. Besides, any resolution higher than your running now is screwy on any pc with any gpu. Not saying you have a bad comp, it's nice and gets the job done. But if you're going to show a benchmark just use the software.

  • Not to be gay but... get these fpses with a 8800GTX 1680x1050 64bit DX10 Very High 0_o.

    Anyway 27 fps average is not very interesting, remove AA since 1680x1050 is enough, and since theres near no Aliasing in crysis... eh.

  • ya there are serious problems with crysis i have an 8800 GTS exrteme oc edition running SLi and i get the same amount of fps as u do tht makes no sence not only tht crysis might look insanly awsome...but it BORING! i play CoD4 and its prolly the best game ive ever played

  • crysis has no "ultra high" the highest setting is "very high" so he's not lying, it is maxed, and how is 3x8800ultra oc'ed compared to 9800gx2 quad sli? i think the ultras would be better, but im not sure...and a QX6700 on water cooling @ 3.4ghz? i guess those things run hot because the non extreme version gets higher on air

  • umm

    3 ultras isnt as good as two gx2s im pretty sure

  • pretty sweet, but to be perfectly honest, not as good as i would have expected. :)

  • Ooh you have enough computer power to launch a NASA mission from your desk oh but wait insted play a terribly coded game called Crysis

  • Don't be jealous :)

    Besides... why in the world would NASA need to use someone else' computer? They've got more than enough money to build thousands like this most likely x.x

  • why do u say ULTRA high when CLEARLY on the options it says VERY high. people do this all the time now and its starting to annoy me >:[

  • man al your people are wrong a friend of mine bought the 8800gts he flashed the bios and now he can play crisis with everything on high min 30 fps

  • Y not run it with full screen?

  • still seems a little laggy probably because 4x AA

  • WASTE OF MONEY....these 8800 Ultras wont even sell for $50 in the next 2 years now u have 3 ultras probobly costed you around $2K...wow what a waste...Just to get around 30FPS on Crysis

  • hell if he wants to wast his money let him its his cash not yours

  • WTF!! My result with this Hardware:

    - Core 2Duo @ 2,4 GHz

    - 1 XFX 8800 GTX manually overclocked to 615/980

    - Crysis from external Drive

    - Very high Patch on WinXP

    - resolution: 1680x1050

    - all very high (patched)

    - no AA

    was: 33,21 FPS average!!

  • u are not using directx 10

  • when u use vista its always usin DX 10

  • Um No. You choose whether to use dx9 or dx10 or if you have an old game dx7. having vista doesn't make you use dx10

  • Not nescesarirly, if you add -DX9 to the search path on the shortcut it runs in DX9. Wich for me is much faster on my crappy 8600GT

  • Slow... use 3 9800gtx SLI :D

  • This video was posted over 4 months ago dipshit, the 9800gtx wasn't out yet.

  • wtf, I hope ya aint got a crap processor xD

  • y? y? y? i dont understand!! y not run it fullscreen?!!?

  • thank you for not talking in this video. you're an annoying little faggot.

  • insane graphics... nice job

  • thats it???

    just 36 fps???

    with 2 9800gtx you get more!

  • don't forget 4xAA

  • @ tsrorl

    only for information....4xAA = Antialiasing x 4

  • I only have one ultra!!:(

  • he is running a widescreen just the video is compressed down to a 4x3 aspect ratio.

  • 1680x1050 is wide screen douche.it's 16:10 aspect ratio and stop bitching and go somewhere else if you have no clue what your talking about.it gets annoying when people bitch if you don't like it don't watch it and do something about it on your own time if you think it's not right i don't see your punk ass benchmarking so shut the hell up and just see what this has to offer.

  • pfft at 16:10. 16:9 ftw

  • lol

  • he should of just bought 2 9800s

  • 9800 GX2s are $600

  • thats preaty gay. i mean come on man, if ur paying like 200- 300 a card, at least u should be able to run the game at atleast 60 frames per second

  • This vid was added jan 21st. The 1.2 patch adds better quad support, crysis has always been buggy w/ quadcores, still is actually. Also keep in mind Crysis is probably the biggest resource whore of a game currently, this game is graphically top of the line.

  • BTW on my 8800 GT i get 10fps @ 800x600 8x AA i think you're low on memory

  • turn the res. up a bit ..and turn the aa down..

  • only 10????dude!that sucks.yea turn the aa off you won't notice any difference and will be able to turn the resolution up.I have a 8800gt for now untill i plan on building a rig.i'm waiting for 98ultras to build one,but for now i'm using my 88gt and mine diffentaley gets more than 30 on 1400x1050 resolution all settings set to ultra high(cvar tweak xp)i don't know but there's something going wrong there.try turning the aa off.

  • I only play it at 800x600 non full screen But that game looks amazing

  • he is using 4xAA so that kills his fps.

  • I have a FX5200 256mem and a 40gb de hd será q vai rodar?????

  • your pc is too slow man sort it out taking to long to load the f***** game (lol)

    crysis is the best game ever