This is not the sound track of an old movie. This film footage was added because the filmer opted not to just show a phonograph running the cylinder, but to show what went on in those days at the labs.
With that much white noise and that little voice it would probably sound so unnatural that it wouldn't really be beneficial. Most noise reductors filter specific frequencies of white noise, but with this much noise that would also take away a lot of frequencies from the voice, which would leave it pretty much butchered
guys listen im one of the progenitors of the use of Edisons technology, i work with sound and sound technology and (modern obviously) anyways i think i can filter some of the noise to hear his voice more clearly.
I think that if Mr. Edison had chosen a studio with capabilities of recording possibly onto a higher quality format -- even something as basic as m4p (with the added benefit of being able to immediately upload to iTunes) -- I feel he would have found his recording enjoying a more pure, longer lasting result.
Fear not. Any comment marked as spam is read by more people than the other uncontroversial comments. People wonder what was posted that could cause such offence. I added a thumbs-up in any case.
There are some of us that appreciate that "white noise" - adds to the ambience. It's awful when someone tries to clean that noise off pushing buttons on their home computer. They end up with an oversampled mess that sounds ridiculous - Long live analog artifacts! ;) Earlnut (below), I think the movie was just something for us to watch while we listened. I don't think "mrocklin" ever claimed it was from the wax cylinder. Check the copyright on your brain sir.
If you go to the national parks' website on Edison, you can hear several very clear recordings from about 1888, one of them the oldest known surviving copy of his voice as he shows off his new medium.
There's also the oldest known recording of music from the same year, a very large choir performing something by Handel. Surreal.
You could remove all the hiss and hum from that recording by processing your computer recording with audio editing software. Then you could use the software to amplify the clean track and it should sound pretty good. I only have rudimentary experience with audio editing software but its pretty easy to locate someone on the web to do that. You should have pretty good success, the recording really isn't that bad.
When exactly was cars invented? this supposed to 1892, right? I see a car. When did the "Horse & carriage" thing stop?
DerekBayRoberts1 8 months ago
@DerekBayRoberts1 The uploader just put random silent movie clips to make it interesting.
MRLOL785 5 months ago
@DerekBayRoberts1 from what i know, the first car was made in 1896, and 'horse and carriage' probably stopped about the 1930s
hitmankgm 5 months ago
This is not the sound track of an old movie. This film footage was added because the filmer opted not to just show a phonograph running the cylinder, but to show what went on in those days at the labs.
EmmetEarwax 3 months ago
I feel like im going back in time watching this
laura20022004 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Justin beiber would have done this right imo
Amakisongs 1 year ago
I was 9yrs old when this shit came out. First time hearing it in 118yrs. WoW thanks for the upload player.
evxdaddy 1 year ago
very good work, awesome job edison...
boyhey1 1 year ago
He had a car then?
Batamon1997 1 year ago
I didn't know Thomas Edison owned a car that early? Whay company is it from?
Batamon1997 1 year ago
@Batamon1997 I believe Edison had a Detroit Electric automobile.
infrogmation 1 year ago
That is OLD !! Thanks for Upload !!
ViewTubeO 1 year ago
You'd think with today's technologies that the white noise could be easily removed, leaving the voice much more audible.
DamonWakefield 1 year ago
@DamonWakefield
With that much white noise and that little voice it would probably sound so unnatural that it wouldn't really be beneficial. Most noise reductors filter specific frequencies of white noise, but with this much noise that would also take away a lot of frequencies from the voice, which would leave it pretty much butchered
vincentjdrummer 1 year ago
@vincentjdrummer True. I had forgotten about that.
DamonWakefield 1 year ago
Film from different time frame. Duh. His facotroy was about 5 miles from where I grew up.
ksteiger 1 year ago
this had to be in the early 1900s.. he was born in the 1840s for goodness sakes.. theyre trying to make him look 70yrs old in 1888? please.. get real
MegaSpearchucker 1 year ago
Can you hear me now? Good.
trunks007100 2 years ago
pretty fancy 1927 Fords going by in 1897
hughmorris2008 2 years ago 2
Sounds like to me I hear him say, Go to 711 and get me a cup of cappuccino. But it can't be that can it. Time Machine?
tim4962 2 years ago
It sounds like my TV. The signal I am unable to receive, thanks to the government.
tim4962 2 years ago
i dont think there was cars in that year and if there was they didnt look like that
jsimone1320 2 years ago
do they have edisons voice on recording?
mikeman9412 2 years ago
i think the guy at 2.10 is saying to his boss, i need a piss..lol.
19smokey19 2 years ago
SPEAK UP!!!!
VideyoJunkei 2 years ago
I think if time didn't get to it, I feel that it could have been "heard" much better. Age kills.
starletdempsy 2 years ago 3
guys listen im one of the progenitors of the use of Edisons technology, i work with sound and sound technology and (modern obviously) anyways i think i can filter some of the noise to hear his voice more clearly.
Orious69 3 years ago
if you did tellme please !
bhconnectionjigsaw 2 years ago 3
Is this also the first digital recording of the first analogue recording? The original is poor quality enough without modern digital distortions.
spectralmusic 3 years ago 14
Comment removed
Sebastifariaan 1 year ago
He is sayin I want my money bro!!
FORCETHETRUTH 3 years ago
The recording sounds so bad because Edison saved it as a .DOS instead of MP3.
CarlosJulio20 3 years ago 80
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...computer humor
thejew2212 3 years ago 3
looooooooooooooooool
bhconnectionjigsaw 2 years ago
@CarlosJulio20 HAHAHAHAHA
olebaj 1 year ago
@CarlosJulio20 Good one! LoL
evxdaddy 1 year ago
@CarlosJulio20 110 years ago, 16 bps, it was very good. ^^
Alexthekiller10 1 year ago 2
i am one of those people who enjoy 78 scratches, this is a real treat !
IQQIQQI 3 years ago 2
its an EVP its a Ghost !
thelegendpuppet 3 years ago 2
Amzing how a recording so old can sound so modern...it's just like a very aliased mp3...
;)
Cubinoid 3 years ago
thats Because it IS an MP3
Edison used to Download songs all the time
MetalHeart8787 3 years ago 3
I think he said at first was "Mary Had A Little Lamb". I also read it in an Amazing Facts book.
dua72 3 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
I think that if Mr. Edison had chosen a studio with capabilities of recording possibly onto a higher quality format -- even something as basic as m4p (with the added benefit of being able to immediately upload to iTunes) -- I feel he would have found his recording enjoying a more pure, longer lasting result.
voicetube 3 years ago 2
Lolzig! Very short sighted of him in my opinion.
FriendlyClay 3 years ago
I see that there are two negative marks re: my "digital studio" comment - it was meant to be amusing and apoligize to anyone it may have offeneded.
I am actually a big fan of Mr. Edison and only hold him and his work in the highest regard.
voicetube 3 years ago 3
Fear not. Any comment marked as spam is read by more people than the other uncontroversial comments. People wonder what was posted that could cause such offence. I added a thumbs-up in any case.
ChrisThe87 3 years ago
this is 2 years before the dickson experimental sound film? are you sure?
tomservo3 3 years ago
Can You Restore It?
PaulStryper24 3 years ago
There are some of us that appreciate that "white noise" - adds to the ambience. It's awful when someone tries to clean that noise off pushing buttons on their home computer. They end up with an oversampled mess that sounds ridiculous - Long live analog artifacts! ;) Earlnut (below), I think the movie was just something for us to watch while we listened. I don't think "mrocklin" ever claimed it was from the wax cylinder. Check the copyright on your brain sir.
eartopsy 3 years ago 4
WOw
lovesGenet 3 years ago
hehe..... its surely from 1910
bjgamers 4 years ago
fuck off
trippendale742 3 years ago
If you go to the national parks' website on Edison, you can hear several very clear recordings from about 1888, one of them the oldest known surviving copy of his voice as he shows off his new medium.
There's also the oldest known recording of music from the same year, a very large choir performing something by Handel. Surreal.
VinylShellacLover 4 years ago
Brilliant but loopy. He actually thought the body was worked by millions of tiny men like a giant machine.
PhantomDog 4 years ago
1892? Looks like about a 1920 Ford there he's driving off in. Might want to check the copyright on that one...
earlnut 4 years ago
There is a lot of digital noise heard, if you can upload the highest quality sound you can.
VideoJunkei 4 years ago
You could remove all the hiss and hum from that recording by processing your computer recording with audio editing software. Then you could use the software to amplify the clean track and it should sound pretty good. I only have rudimentary experience with audio editing software but its pretty easy to locate someone on the web to do that. You should have pretty good success, the recording really isn't that bad.
TopVideo77 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
<b> World's largest sex and swinger personals with over
20,000,000 members looking to hook up with someone just like you!
Enter [_SexDating4Free.com_] to Join for FREE
</b>
violanchello 4 years ago
god damn
pw3djoe 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
my thoughts exactly
krax12982 4 years ago
i dont think it from 1892
Thomas Edison was born in 1847
but he looked like in more than 60-year-old in this movie,he was an old man,not a 45 man
candyloveandy 4 years ago
obviously the movie had to have been made much later, this isn't a soundtrack to it, that's just there for something to watch
bphutchins 4 years ago
I feel the need to question what the point in joining a wax cylinder track from 1892 with footage shot and edited much later is?
finnon28 4 years ago
Woah, I can hardly hear him! This is remarkable.
Saraculture13 4 years ago
great****************
clauditaluna 4 years ago
woahhhh this must belike super rare.. its awesome...keep it up... the video, i mean, don't take it down
THEGLASSOFMILK 4 years ago
This is not 1892 for sure but between 1900-1910
olebaj 2 years ago