I will not watch Lion King the same anymore lol But still a good book i hate Lo in the movie she irks me but hey thats a 12 year old for you lol we all were annoyinng but hell we didnt know how to reel a man in
i can't even deal with how hot he is. like, UGH. i read the book and i was like WOW HUMBERT IS SUCH A DAMN CREEP and then i watched the movie and i was like I CAN'T EVEN CALL HIM A CREEP ANYMORE LOOK AT HIS FACE
I thought the movie, just like the novel was a masterpiece. I don't justify what Hum did to Lo nor do I encourage things like those depicted here. But all in all I think it showed a very artistic side of Hum's obsession with Lolita, unlike the Kubrick version which was filmed more like it was from the perspective of a third party.
Humbert likes her. She arouses him. He tries to stay conscious. She arouses him some more. He lets her arouse him. She takes action. Humbert takes action.
Eh, I see nothing wrong with it. Only thing i noticed is that during the movie she starts using her body and talent to get what she wanted. In general, Being a little whore.
But, All in all amazing movie, Wonderful actress, And i am beyond glad the mother dies.
Is it REALLY REALLY bad that all I thought during this scene (apart from how it should have been in the film) was how nice H.H's voice is?
I know that's very wierd but I really like British accents... even though I'm English myself...but yeah, I like his accent. And this scene should have been in the film/
And and whoever said by watching this we were all paedophiles, we're not, ok? If everyone who read/watched Lolita was a aedophile, I doubt any kids in the world would be safe. Grow up.
It's so hard to make a screen adaptation of how Nabokov wrote "Lolita"! (But this deleted scene comes pretty close.)
The finished 1997 film did capture Humbert's sweetness and guilt, but makes him too much of a sad, romantic-tragic "hero". In the book, Humbert was a more sarcastic European intellectual who made witty, disparaging remarks on American culture. This made his pedophilic obsession with an American nymphet ironic and (in a twisted way) very, very funny---all at the same time.
@RobzFanpire that's completely irrelevant. it doesn't compare to a 12 year old motherless child whose caretaker is in a sexual/manipulative relationship with her...
@RobzFanpire Yes but that's different... in the book she is a lot younger looking... pubescent and he technically rapes her etc... it's different to the film, she only likes him in the beginning.
I'm 18 and my boyfriend is 31. It wasn't planned that way, but when someone loves you for exactly who you are, who cares? And it's your life, if other people don't like it, that's just too bad for them. After the initial shock, most people are usually supportive. But, it's been 3 years for us, and some people still choose to look the other way. Guess they better get used to it, we have every intention on getting married.
I think that many people miss what Nabokov is actually getting at with this masterpiece. He is touching on a very dark side of the human condition and in a way persuading us to feel sorry for or pitty Humbert for his illness that was brought on through no fault of his own. I applaud the Showtime network's courage in releasing this film. We need not shut things like this away and never talk about them.
@NescioQuidErgoDeus Literature always comes down to interpretation. My interpretation of Nabokov's novel was that he was exploring a darker side of what may be the nature of some people. I do not think that Nabokov meant to condone Pedophilia. I also do not think the director of Lolita the movie. The 1997 version is definitely a lot closer to the novel, but it is still just the director's interpretation of the work. Trust me, I am not stupid. I read the novel before viewing this film.
I never said Nabokov condoned pedophilia. On the contrary. If anything, it could be seen as a cautionary tale or a psychological profile... Though, Nabokov has said that he doesn't think art needs to have a moral or a point (I'm paraphrasing, obviously).
I don't think Lyne was condoning pedophilia either, but he made the mistake of casting a girl who looks old enough to be in college, and there were parts where he made Humbert too sympathetic and Lolita too intelligently evil...
I think that mant people miss what Nabokov is actually getting at with this masterpiece. He is touching on a very dark side of the human condition and in a way persuading us to feel sorry for or pitty Humbert for his illness that was brought on through no fault of his own. I applaud the Showtime network's courage in releasing this film. We need not shut things like this away and never talk about them.
Well im 12 and im sorta in a relationship with my english teacher i might actually be pregnant... i don't know what to do he has a 10 yr old and i feel bad but he tells me that we r gonna go live in his big house by the lake so i let him do things to me after school i like it it feels good but i feel like its wrong to do those things. espesially that he he is old enough to be my dad hes very atractive though.
@Tayuya12611 if it's true you should go to the police and sue him right away. he doesn't like YOU he just wants to get in your pants. once someone figures it out, or you do get pregnant he will drop you like a stone and never lay eyes on you again.
@tom53332 i don't think so... he acts like he REALLY REALLY loves me so I love him back by showing it in letting him have sex with me i dont think ill get pregnant tho he pulls out and makes sure i wont get pregnant so yeah
wow...I actually feel bad for this guy...Having to deal with his attraction for her by just watching her is bad enough, but to have her all over him like that has to be pure torture. And then she is so oblivious(or not oblivious?) to what she does to him....He's probably going crazy!!!
Ok, first comment about and philosophy curse: do we all not love pussies (hetero part)? Ok, I agree with pre-teenie appearance... but hey? Lots of the characters in such erotic or seduce way are over the age than they look like. Ok, the question is: "do this appearance is a meaning of a mind thinking appearance of a minus 18 year old!?" I think that we handle in a art production to serious with the question of pedo's! I mean Í am 25 still could be one of them but I lov epussies and I could be
@dirtycutfreak2005 that I get to attached to a 8 years younger lady. love happens thats a difference. the same whats the meaning of the movie. not the one of preteens altought it seems to look like it to make it more in interesting!
@JoAnneMB1 But that could mean nothing really. For all we know he could be telling the truth. Just because he found Lolita *oddly* attractive it doesn't mean he wasn't saying the truth. I believe he was saying the truth, because there ARE girls like Lolita: precocious, vulgar preteens and pubescents who flirt with people that could be their parents. *shrugs* All I know is that Humbert was already a traumatized man before he met his undoing...
i have a question about this book. if lolita hated humbert so much, why did she love Quilty if he's the same thing as humbert? if she loved Quilty, why did she hate humbert?
@boobooboo123459 My thoughts exactly?! WTF was so great about Quilty? He was the worse character in the whole book. Not t to mention what he tried to make Lo do. May be it was because he was well off. Or because he could have any little girl he wanted and that made Lo jealous.
@boobooboo123459 She feels Humbert is forcing her to do this. On the other hand, she views Quilty as a glamorous showbiz guy who can 'rescue' her from Humbert. The only difference she feels by liking Quilty is that it's her choice to like him, rather than being forced like Humbert. However, by the end when he takes her to make porn, she sees he's no better and runs away. So she did love him when she was a kid, but more like just the idea of him rather than the reality that emerged.
I can't help but think she is purposely doing that with her feet. She isn't stupid and he is a grown man. Things happen when certain areas are rubbed. She probably is, isn't she?
@keyodi It was already a big deal when this remake came out. It was really hard for them to find funding due to the subject matter. Keep in mind that it was only a decade or so ago.
Lolita is such a slut... thats what i thought, then H is just a total psychopath freak.. then i felt sorry for her. But yes, this scene is very cringe-inducing.
i hate that in this movie very a lot of dirty and platitude. real Lolita should be other. pretty and cute. but this Lolita from this movie are shameful.
Lolita era un demonio en cuerpo de niña , pobresito el amigo que tubo que pasar por esa prueva y no la pudo superar lo cierto es que es una gran novela...
@kevthecat11 You reveal your complete stupidity with your comment like anyone else who is offended by Lolita the book or movie.... firstly it is one of the greatest works of art and second of all the main theme of the book is surprisingly not about pedophilia it is about art and seeing everything in an artistic form.... how sad to have simpletons comment on this story.
she is definatley a great actress. i find it amazing how they can just do with the situation if it calls for. on a side note, i found this scene, as well as Dominic swain incredibly arousing.
I really don't know why, but I find the part where he catches the apple at 1:37 incredibly sexy...it sounds very strange but that part is so hot to me. Speaking of hot, Jeremy Irons is beautiful...I'm only 18 but I would ravish him. He's gorgeous, along with his velvet, yet haunting voice. And the accent is the cherry on top...
Even though it is not meant to be I find this scene very erotic. However when I read it in the book I thought it was horrible. I think because Jeremy Irons is soo fucking hot.
The actress has a sort of... natural childishness that just made it work! It wasn't contrived; it sort of felt... natural, like she just went with the flow. Any more directing or technicality woulda' messed that nuanced balanced off.
The book is very good. The girl was 12.5 and Humbert's discussion of Nymphets is interesting. He makes the point that until recently grown men could impale 12 year old girls in Western Europe and 9 in Asian. the book at least makes you think about OUR blind faith in the asexual prepubescent. I was never asexual as a child and neither were my contempories. Nevertheless, audlts should not interfere with children - it's ethically repulsive.
@antoninus138 I feel odd, weird and out of place at reading your comment. XD I was androgynous and asexual till I hit like... my 17th birthday. XD I thought I was normal, but jokes on me. XD
@themack355 But in the book the mother is voicestrous, clumsy, annoying and in constant conflict with her daughter. To be a good actor you have to become the characters and I think they both do it well.
@MySymptom I don't know how you can even argue...the mother and daughter sounded like they just got handed their scripts for the first time and they were reading it off! it fucking sucked
@themack355 actually ti sounded just like a mother-daughter fight. XD Mum and I sound the same when we shout at each other. XD You need to fix your ears. ^^
@akissy i wont comment on your mum - but i think you might need a personality. by the looks of page 1 of the board, it looks like you've taken it upon yourself to respond to just about every comment on here...so maybe getting a life would help too.
If this is how you talk, with those words and that tone of voice - you are totally fucking lame. these two sound like they're reading off cue cards
@themack355 Talking about getting a life, if you think that I'm lame and not really worth it, then why even answer? ^^ And I comment because that's what YouTube comments are for, and I like talking to people, and reading their responses because they are many times interesting and sometimes even teach me things I didn't know, both here and IRL. If that's not having a life, then I'm happy not having one. ^^
am I the only one thinking that Lolita brought everything that happened to her on herself? i mean, she was one precocious little girl with actually no conscious (sp?), she's bratty, selfish and spitful, at leastin this version. I always thought of her as a kind of victim, but now I see her as a kind of villian.
@HipHopHatesRap Now, that was stupid. First of it-s spelled victim, and second, if you think most of the girls play victim event hough they brought the problems on themselves you're way too wrong in the head, mister. Some girls ARE victims, many girls don't bring on themselves a drunk father, a wife beater, an abusive boyfriend, nor a rapist or stalker.
@akissy I'm not backing down on my statement. At some point in their lives both men and women put themselves in bad positions and end up getting hurt. Difference is, most women break out the "I'm a victim" card...most men don't. Like the saying goes "Take it like a man." Now, I'm not stupid! I know women...at no fault of their own...get victimized all the time but I'm talking about those women. I'm talking about girls like Lolita.....
@HipHopHatesRap that's what you would love to believe. but men break out the "She brought it on herself" card alot , you know? And if you're not generalizing, then don't say most girls. Because girls like Lolita, believe it or not, are not the mayority.
@akissy Well I don't believe it because I see it day in and day out. Your experiences must be different than mine. You can only speak for what you've seen and I can only speak for what I've seen but most girls that I've run into play victims. I'm 21 so I can only speak about women around my age and younger and I think all girls that age use the victim card. Oh and in my orginal statement I never said anything about rape. You brought that word up not me
@HipHopHatesRap and where am I commenting on rape again? o.o And you must be running into some pretty shallow girls, time to think of a changein scenery, no? I'm going to be 23, and I can tell you that I've been lucky and smart enough to seek people who are mature, or try to be. The moment I detect a drama queen, even though it's hard, I just don't get near them. Maybe you should do the same thing?
@akissy "Some girls ARE victims, many girls don't bring on themselves a drunk father, a wife beater, an abusive boyfriend, nor a rapist or stalker." Those are your words and it looks like you did bring up rape. And shallow women...not my thing. I like good, level headed girls but that doesn't mean I don't have idiotic male and female friends. Everybody has shallow people in their lives and I seriously doubt you're any different than the rest of us.
@HipHopHatesRap I used to have shallow friends when I was in junior high and high school. I don't try to get on a high horse here, but i think I can recognize shallow people from good level-headed ones. But yeah, there's shallow people who are nice, but their shallowness gerts overshadowed by thet niceness and, well... they turn out not to be that shallow in the end. XD
@HipHopHatesRap and I said that because you were generalizing and saying most girls play the victim card just because. I think there was a gap in communication.
@akissy ....Girls that play with fire, get burned, but pretend like they're so little, fragile, and innocent. Like there's no way little old me could have done that to myself.
@akissy That's a very controversial question that's been debated many times. It's like asking, "Do kids who bully bring it on themselves when the victims shoot or maim them badly?" Not to long ago a teenage girl was prostituting herself out of her home for extra cash. Some men got violent with her, raped and beat her. Did she bring it on herself? Some would say, "No! She may have done wrong, but she didn't deserve to be hurt." But isn't it human nature that pain is the greatest lesson?
@akissy Well it's common for littlle girls to act flirty with older guys, the point is as an adult you are expected to know better then to diddle young teenage girls.. Basically before a certain age you cannot give consent, and for a man of Humberts age to be attracted to a young immature girl like that is something he should have controlled.
@keyodi Not really. When you are sick like that your impulses are hard to control. Mum's studying physchology, she told me that some things cannot be controlled on your own, that's why people take meds and get therapy and that sort of thing, and since paedophilia is not an accepted practice it can turn into an obsessive-compulsive disorder, and I think Humbert had that. o.o Plus he was obsessed with Lolita, it's hard to quench an obsession.
@akissy It's a bit more complex than that. The themes explored here are really weakness and corruption in both characters. Lolita is weak and in love with Quilty yet corrupt; realizing that unable to fend for herself in an adult world she is willing to use sexual favors to get what she wants from older men. Humbert is a weak man and is drawn in by the fact that Lolita will allow him to shape her into his ultimate sexual fantasy for a price; by giving away his resources as an adult.
@akissy I don't think she's either victim or villain. She is however precocious and very flirtatious. She is very aware of her sex appeal and knows the kind of effect she has on men, not unlike most women--especially girls of her age. I remember when I was her age, I suddenly became very much aware of my sexuality. The difference is she doesn't really control or hide her sexuality because she has no outlet and no discipline. Humbert perpetuates her behaviour by not staying away from her.
@akissy "she came onto me" isn't that always the pedophile's excuse? if you've read the book you should realize that it's told from the perspective of a murderer who likes little girls-- not exactly your most reliable narrator. We don't know anything about the real Lolita, except that she cried every night after she thought Humbert was asleep.
@VivaLaVivienne Actually, that's incorrect. Pedophiles who turn into child molesters (not all pedophiles act on their desires) act very different from how Humbert Humbert acted. He was traumatized by the loss of his childhood sweetheart. His emotional intelligence got stagnated at the age of 12-14 more or less. He transfered all of repressed desire into a girl who looked a lot like his sweetheart, he became obsessed with the only image he had of love. It's not justification, though.
When he was younger he fell in love with a girl, and she died. So he sort of transfers his lust onto Lolita who has similar features. Almost everyone does it subconsciously, but we look for those characteristic in older men or women, not in underage girls( thank goodness).
if your grandmother was born between 1940-1960 chances are she was married between 14-16. It was not against the law if it was you would not be born. Don't let the media manipulate your thoughts and ideas of right and wrong
@yappertrap Today's society smuggles teens more. Plus, older women are jealous on teen girls who are attractive to men and age of consent laws are the perfect ocasion to get them out of the picture.
@yappertrap Of course, there are also good intentioned people who consider that sexual revolution has created a lustier society, normalising sexual liberalism and perversions. That's why it was considered that teen girls/boys are in greater danger than decades ago to choose the wrong path and age of consent laws are tougher and tougher.
OH MY GOD THIS IS LIKE THE MOST INTENSE DELETED SCENE EVER!
Aspenavius 2 weeks ago
Meh, his good taste in music wasn't strong enough in the end... he stopped being sick way too quickly.
twooffour 1 month ago
Scar getting down and dirty.
hodgepodgebuhgodge 1 month ago
this scene today isnt very risque, but back then i can understand why they cut it
keyodi 2 months ago
I will not watch Lion King the same anymore lol But still a good book i hate Lo in the movie she irks me but hey thats a 12 year old for you lol we all were annoyinng but hell we didnt know how to reel a man in
SlytherinBeauty14 2 months ago
i can't even deal with how hot he is. like, UGH. i read the book and i was like WOW HUMBERT IS SUCH A DAMN CREEP and then i watched the movie and i was like I CAN'T EVEN CALL HIM A CREEP ANYMORE LOOK AT HIS FACE
t33ngoth 2 months ago 3
I thought the movie, just like the novel was a masterpiece. I don't justify what Hum did to Lo nor do I encourage things like those depicted here. But all in all I think it showed a very artistic side of Hum's obsession with Lolita, unlike the Kubrick version which was filmed more like it was from the perspective of a third party.
Dolores413 2 months ago
@cymrutroll I don't see why he's so evil, I mean, Lolita is the one flirting with him, and he NEVER hurts her, he LOVES her.
Liara1001 3 months ago
i only watched this scene cos i was told there was a cgreat deal of focus on lolitas feet. im very disappointed
crow12134 4 months ago
Humbert likes her. She arouses him. He tries to stay conscious. She arouses him some more. He lets her arouse him. She takes action. Humbert takes action.
tssas12 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Im 18 now and ive always been attracted to older men from when i was about 13/14.
mekissingyou 5 months ago
Comment removed
msamy357 6 months ago
Oh yeah, For all you whiteknighting moralfags out there...
All men are attracted to underage females.
sandvig1990 6 months ago 5
Eh, I see nothing wrong with it. Only thing i noticed is that during the movie she starts using her body and talent to get what she wanted. In general, Being a little whore.
But, All in all amazing movie, Wonderful actress, And i am beyond glad the mother dies.
sandvig1990 6 months ago
/shrugs
I'd do him.
VampyreCake 7 months ago 4
i remember watching this movie years ago, she's such a tease hottie.
Frienever 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I see, many of you haven't read the book!
feelmeout2 7 months ago
the kiss on the neck was so inapropriate - but I understand that he had no control over it. Its very complicated this.
A girl of that age can be very naive - not her fault. I think its his responsibilty to draw the line - but he cant.
florencelovme 8 months ago
the 1st minute is not deleted on my vhs
StinkiwinkiPoo 8 months ago
To RobzFanpire
*Shit I can't "replay" - error eh*
16 / 17 is a young woman, adult phisicaly...
we shouldn't comparision almoust adult young woman to a child like Lo, she had 12 [?] years old if I remember.
RinWatashi 8 months ago
I am so inlove with Jeremy Irons!! I saw him on Damage and I cannot wait to buy the Lolita book and dvd.
susanjoy143 10 months ago 4
She washed her hair a couple of months ago?
SvartBil 11 months ago 2
Is it REALLY REALLY bad that all I thought during this scene (apart from how it should have been in the film) was how nice H.H's voice is?
I know that's very wierd but I really like British accents... even though I'm English myself...but yeah, I like his accent. And this scene should have been in the film/
And and whoever said by watching this we were all paedophiles, we're not, ok? If everyone who read/watched Lolita was a aedophile, I doubt any kids in the world would be safe. Grow up.
TheSingSong90 1 year ago 35
4:32
I think he just came...
MusicMan53100 1 year ago 6
This has been flagged as spam show
"Congratulations! You are all paedophiles."
LOL.
InThunder18 1 year ago
WHY DID THEY DELETE THIS?
xblueblaze 1 year ago 7
@xblueblaze
For real... this was like, one of the most important scenes in the book.
JessMist 1 year ago 4
It's so hard to make a screen adaptation of how Nabokov wrote "Lolita"! (But this deleted scene comes pretty close.)
The finished 1997 film did capture Humbert's sweetness and guilt, but makes him too much of a sad, romantic-tragic "hero". In the book, Humbert was a more sarcastic European intellectual who made witty, disparaging remarks on American culture. This made his pedophilic obsession with an American nymphet ironic and (in a twisted way) very, very funny---all at the same time.
TachieBillano 1 year ago 10
This has been flagged as spam show
Im 16 and Im going out with a 28 year old.. I dont really care what people think.
RobzFanpire 1 year ago 34
Comment removed
positivoshow 1 year ago
@RobzFanpire that's completely irrelevant. it doesn't compare to a 12 year old motherless child whose caretaker is in a sexual/manipulative relationship with her...
stevensartifacts 9 months ago 3
@RobzFanpire Yes but that's different... in the book she is a lot younger looking... pubescent and he technically rapes her etc... it's different to the film, she only likes him in the beginning.
clawler123 9 months ago
@RobzFanpire
Wouldnt that be classed as illegal in the usa?
A few years age gap is ok, but 16 & 28? Ew...
What kind of 28 year old guy would want to go out with a 16 year old girl anyway? I can only imagine what kinda guy he is :/
AshleyMJ90 8 months ago
@RobzFanpire Well, I'M 20 and going out with a 40 year old. Oohh... he's so luvely.
jaghetermy 7 months ago
@RobzFanpire
Good for you. I am going out with someone who is 16 years older. I get a lot of crap for it, but I don't care.
Trustworthyalma 6 months ago
@RobzFanpire
My parents were exactly the same ages as you and your bf/gf when they got married! D: Whoa!
MissJoey006 4 months ago in playlist MissJoey006's favourites
@RobzFanpire
That's disgusting, and you're a fucking idiot. I can't believe this is even a top comment, you all disgust me.
Detth2you 4 months ago
@RobzFanpire
Good for you! And nice to feel less alone.
I'm 18 and my boyfriend is 31. It wasn't planned that way, but when someone loves you for exactly who you are, who cares? And it's your life, if other people don't like it, that's just too bad for them. After the initial shock, most people are usually supportive. But, it's been 3 years for us, and some people still choose to look the other way. Guess they better get used to it, we have every intention on getting married.
Piggie822 3 months ago
Is good! nobody can"t say nothing
LoliTa57444 1 year ago
@LoliTa57444 Have you seen the Stanley's Kubrick ?
marirob92 1 year ago
I think that many people miss what Nabokov is actually getting at with this masterpiece. He is touching on a very dark side of the human condition and in a way persuading us to feel sorry for or pitty Humbert for his illness that was brought on through no fault of his own. I applaud the Showtime network's courage in releasing this film. We need not shut things like this away and never talk about them.
sssssrs 1 year ago 6
@sssssrs
I thought the movie was good, but it didn't seem to emphasize the important detail in the book: Humbert is an unreliable narrator.
Also, Swain looked too old for Lolita, who was supposed to be a child.
The film is one of the reasons Lolita gets a lot of misaimed fandom.
NescioQuidErgoDeus 1 year ago
@NescioQuidErgoDeus Literature always comes down to interpretation. My interpretation of Nabokov's novel was that he was exploring a darker side of what may be the nature of some people. I do not think that Nabokov meant to condone Pedophilia. I also do not think the director of Lolita the movie. The 1997 version is definitely a lot closer to the novel, but it is still just the director's interpretation of the work. Trust me, I am not stupid. I read the novel before viewing this film.
sssssrs 1 year ago 4
@sssssrs
I never said Nabokov condoned pedophilia. On the contrary. If anything, it could be seen as a cautionary tale or a psychological profile... Though, Nabokov has said that he doesn't think art needs to have a moral or a point (I'm paraphrasing, obviously).
I don't think Lyne was condoning pedophilia either, but he made the mistake of casting a girl who looks old enough to be in college, and there were parts where he made Humbert too sympathetic and Lolita too intelligently evil...
NescioQuidErgoDeus 1 year ago
@sssssrs
... I also agree that the `97 version is closer to the novel, but as I've said, it did miss a few points.
NescioQuidErgoDeus 1 year ago
Comment removed
sssssrs 1 year ago
I think that mant people miss what Nabokov is actually getting at with this masterpiece. He is touching on a very dark side of the human condition and in a way persuading us to feel sorry for or pitty Humbert for his illness that was brought on through no fault of his own. I applaud the Showtime network's courage in releasing this film. We need not shut things like this away and never talk about them.
sssssrs 1 year ago 6
how old is this girl supposed to be? cuz she's a huge flirt. daaaam.
paularzzz 1 year ago 4
@paularzzz 12 years old
pepaxlirika 1 year ago
@pepaxlirika Not eveeen shes supposed to be 14 -.-
graciedalazy 1 year ago
i thought about adding this scene to my favourites. then i realized what it actually contained.
loosekarrott 1 year ago
voice of scar from the Lion King! :D
leafclash 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Well im 12 and im sorta in a relationship with my english teacher i might actually be pregnant... i don't know what to do he has a 10 yr old and i feel bad but he tells me that we r gonna go live in his big house by the lake so i let him do things to me after school i like it it feels good but i feel like its wrong to do those things. espesially that he he is old enough to be my dad hes very atractive though.
Tayuya12611 1 year ago 3
@Tayuya12611 if it's true you should go to the police and sue him right away. he doesn't like YOU he just wants to get in your pants. once someone figures it out, or you do get pregnant he will drop you like a stone and never lay eyes on you again.
tom53332 1 year ago
@tom53332 i don't think so... he acts like he REALLY REALLY loves me so I love him back by showing it in letting him have sex with me i dont think ill get pregnant tho he pulls out and makes sure i wont get pregnant so yeah
Tayuya12611 1 year ago
@Tayuya12611 wow.....you actually believe what this guy tells you?
frostflower789 1 year ago
@frostflower789 yeah why not he loves me more than alot of people will ever know
Tayuya12611 1 year ago
@frostflower789 wow you actually believe waht this youtube person tells you ? :>
BloodFeather 1 year ago
Porca, porca, porca, adoro <3
portugueselatinagirl 1 year ago
this is so wrong...lmao. XD
dulcefantasia15 1 year ago
wow...I actually feel bad for this guy...Having to deal with his attraction for her by just watching her is bad enough, but to have her all over him like that has to be pure torture. And then she is so oblivious(or not oblivious?) to what she does to him....He's probably going crazy!!!
midnighthanyou 1 year ago 3
Hi does anyone know how too get to the hotel clip where she tells him hes not her first lover??
bushjuniorjulysix 1 year ago
Ok, first comment about and philosophy curse: do we all not love pussies (hetero part)? Ok, I agree with pre-teenie appearance... but hey? Lots of the characters in such erotic or seduce way are over the age than they look like. Ok, the question is: "do this appearance is a meaning of a mind thinking appearance of a minus 18 year old!?" I think that we handle in a art production to serious with the question of pedo's! I mean Í am 25 still could be one of them but I lov epussies and I could be
dirtycutfreak2005 1 year ago
@dirtycutfreak2005 that I get to attached to a 8 years younger lady. love happens thats a difference. the same whats the meaning of the movie. not the one of preteens altought it seems to look like it to make it more in interesting!
dirtycutfreak2005 1 year ago
is he crouchy coz he has a bone on or what?
jigglyfidda125 1 year ago
"And wash your hair young lady!
-I did wash it!
-When?
-Couple months ago"
celynadwell 1 year ago
Remember, akissy, we are seeing what happened from Humbert's perspective only.
JoAnneMB1 1 year ago
@JoAnneMB1 But that could mean nothing really. For all we know he could be telling the truth. Just because he found Lolita *oddly* attractive it doesn't mean he wasn't saying the truth. I believe he was saying the truth, because there ARE girls like Lolita: precocious, vulgar preteens and pubescents who flirt with people that could be their parents. *shrugs* All I know is that Humbert was already a traumatized man before he met his undoing...
akissy 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
what a sick pervert, i hate a humbert!
mariaib 1 year ago
i have a question about this book. if lolita hated humbert so much, why did she love Quilty if he's the same thing as humbert? if she loved Quilty, why did she hate humbert?
boobooboo123459 1 year ago
@boobooboo123459 My thoughts exactly?! WTF was so great about Quilty? He was the worse character in the whole book. Not t to mention what he tried to make Lo do. May be it was because he was well off. Or because he could have any little girl he wanted and that made Lo jealous.
sumoni 1 year ago
@sumoni WTF was my thought exactly... especially since Quilty was so freakin' ugly whereas Jeremy Irons is HOT.
MissJanifa 11 months ago 5
@boobooboo123459 She feels Humbert is forcing her to do this. On the other hand, she views Quilty as a glamorous showbiz guy who can 'rescue' her from Humbert. The only difference she feels by liking Quilty is that it's her choice to like him, rather than being forced like Humbert. However, by the end when he takes her to make porn, she sees he's no better and runs away. So she did love him when she was a kid, but more like just the idea of him rather than the reality that emerged.
AlinaAnn 7 months ago
WOOWWW MAN I LOVE THIS!!!
manganimand 1 year ago
How old did they say she was in the movie. She's only 12 in this part of the book.
RuralNler92 1 year ago
colorada pendeja.
CarlosRex19 1 year ago
The film makers were aware that Lolita is supposed to be pre-pubescent, right?
Xondar11223344 1 year ago
Jizz in my pants?
Charmolution 1 year ago
I can't help but think she is purposely doing that with her feet. She isn't stupid and he is a grown man. Things happen when certain areas are rubbed. She probably is, isn't she?
EpicFaerietale 1 year ago 4
Simple definition of "ADULTOPHILE" = any under-age person sexually attracted to any over-age person.
DougPatton1 1 year ago 3
oooo Jeremy irons..he's sexy..
ColombianMamacita 1 year ago 3
@ColombianMamacita Incredibly so ;)
MissJanifa 11 months ago
what a tease i bet thats some girls objective in life just to drive guys crazy
igotthatsnowmayn 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Wow, that is some great acting! It seems so natural. I want to see this movie now.
RichardForkins 1 year ago
if this movie had come out now it wouldnt be such a big deal
keyodi 1 year ago
@keyodi It was already a big deal when this remake came out. It was really hard for them to find funding due to the subject matter. Keep in mind that it was only a decade or so ago.
EpicFaerietale 1 year ago
Lolita is such a slut... thats what i thought, then H is just a total psychopath freak.. then i felt sorry for her. But yes, this scene is very cringe-inducing.
ophelia0thy0mermaid 1 year ago
i hate that in this movie very a lot of dirty and platitude. real Lolita should be other. pretty and cute. but this Lolita from this movie are shameful.
MsUniqueUser 1 year ago
.....awkward.
okano186 1 year ago
Should have kept all the deleted scenes.
AliceInNNeverland 1 year ago 59
Jeremy Irons is SOOOO hot omg.
This scene is really awkward to watch and makes you uncomfortable. Not as uncomfortable as some of the comments though.
OmgitsNeens 1 year ago 7
what's the song that Lolita sings in this scene?
SarahMosh 1 year ago
Lolita era un demonio en cuerpo de niña , pobresito el amigo que tubo que pasar por esa prueva y no la pudo superar lo cierto es que es una gran novela...
JUANIGNACIORR 1 year ago
Too old.
LightBrand 1 year ago
Congratulations! You are all paedophiles.
kevthecat11 1 year ago 35
@kevthecat11 You reveal your complete stupidity with your comment like anyone else who is offended by Lolita the book or movie.... firstly it is one of the greatest works of art and second of all the main theme of the book is surprisingly not about pedophilia it is about art and seeing everything in an artistic form.... how sad to have simpletons comment on this story.
stevesg92 1 year ago
@kevthecat11 FAIL
Tayuya12611 1 year ago
@kevthecat11 Congratulations, you can't spell Pedophile
ZomgNinjah 1 year ago 5
@ZomgNinjah Actually, that's the original, correct English spelling. Before Americans massacred it, lol
MmeLEnfer 1 year ago
@kevthecat11 i believe the correct term is hebephiles, it was on wikipedia
trolololololololism 1 year ago
@kevthecat11 Wow, 662,525 PedoBears?
MusicMan53100 1 year ago 7
@kevthecat11 THE big controversy that happened when the book first came out was that by the end of the book, one almost sympathised with Humbert.
SkyFoxCode 11 months ago 4
@kevthecat11 so are you
cromerbeach 10 months ago
@kevthecat11 sorry but, your comment is just stupid
Sugoitxu 10 months ago
she is definatley a great actress. i find it amazing how they can just do with the situation if it calls for. on a side note, i found this scene, as well as Dominic swain incredibly arousing.
MacdreezieuBeezie 1 year ago 6
I really don't know why, but I find the part where he catches the apple at 1:37 incredibly sexy...it sounds very strange but that part is so hot to me. Speaking of hot, Jeremy Irons is beautiful...I'm only 18 but I would ravish him. He's gorgeous, along with his velvet, yet haunting voice. And the accent is the cherry on top...
disneyismyheart247 1 year ago 5
Lolita is my dream.... but Lolita being a nymphet is hardly portrayed in this particular scene.
rajneesh999u 1 year ago
Why was it deleted?
Kadadj 1 year ago
hurts so good
DennistheGreat483 1 year ago
Even though it is not meant to be I find this scene very erotic. However when I read it in the book I thought it was horrible. I think because Jeremy Irons is soo fucking hot.
MissLolitaLollypop 1 year ago
The book is way more sick then the movie
carotte477 1 year ago 3
@carotte477 The book is way better than the movie
SvartBil 1 year ago
Totally understand why it was deleted... That's sick!
burbliyum 1 year ago
OH MY GOD
PeichenPhilip 1 year ago
sweet girl..she's gagging for it!
natural instincts, amen.
mmmbeachlover 1 year ago 2
Everytime he mentions Americans, she just takes another step.
I have nothing more to add.
JETZcorp 1 year ago
The actress has a sort of... natural childishness that just made it work! It wasn't contrived; it sort of felt... natural, like she just went with the flow. Any more directing or technicality woulda' messed that nuanced balanced off.
NEXTLOVER 1 year ago 8
The book is very good. The girl was 12.5 and Humbert's discussion of Nymphets is interesting. He makes the point that until recently grown men could impale 12 year old girls in Western Europe and 9 in Asian. the book at least makes you think about OUR blind faith in the asexual prepubescent. I was never asexual as a child and neither were my contempories. Nevertheless, audlts should not interfere with children - it's ethically repulsive.
antoninus138 1 year ago
@antoninus138 I feel odd, weird and out of place at reading your comment. XD I was androgynous and asexual till I hit like... my 17th birthday. XD I thought I was normal, but jokes on me. XD
akissy 1 year ago
what in the blue hell?
Lilin1989 1 year ago
terrible acting
themack355 1 year ago
@themack355 You obviously know nothing about acting, let alone what makes it good of terrible.
MySymptom 1 year ago
@MySymptom I know that yelling and over doing all your lines isn't good acting!
themack355 1 year ago
@themack355 But in the book the mother is voicestrous, clumsy, annoying and in constant conflict with her daughter. To be a good actor you have to become the characters and I think they both do it well.
UnyieldingDefiance 1 year ago 3
@UnyieldingDefiance what I'm saying is that it looks forced and unnatural
themack355 1 year ago
@MySymptom I don't know how you can even argue...the mother and daughter sounded like they just got handed their scripts for the first time and they were reading it off! it fucking sucked
themack355 1 year ago
@themack355 actually ti sounded just like a mother-daughter fight. XD Mum and I sound the same when we shout at each other. XD You need to fix your ears. ^^
akissy 1 year ago
@akissy i wont comment on your mum - but i think you might need a personality. by the looks of page 1 of the board, it looks like you've taken it upon yourself to respond to just about every comment on here...so maybe getting a life would help too.
If this is how you talk, with those words and that tone of voice - you are totally fucking lame. these two sound like they're reading off cue cards
themack355 1 year ago
@themack355 Talking about getting a life, if you think that I'm lame and not really worth it, then why even answer? ^^ And I comment because that's what YouTube comments are for, and I like talking to people, and reading their responses because they are many times interesting and sometimes even teach me things I didn't know, both here and IRL. If that's not having a life, then I'm happy not having one. ^^
akissy 1 year ago
"That's not dirh-tee; it's Life magazine!"
lol.
christentze 1 year ago
who the fuck said shes not beautiful .... shes fuckin hot !!
sunilshivanand 1 year ago
i thought it was a good movie Nothing could ever justify pedophiles but this gives you more of an understanding of the way they think...
16reynoso 1 year ago 6
@16reynoso: And how would junk-media labelled 'Adultophiles' think ?
DougPatton1 1 year ago
She's not that attractive...
sareusepeus 1 year ago
@sareusepeus shes not now
NorwichGirl100 1 year ago
@sareusepeus That's not the point. The focus is on how manipulative she is - consciously or unconsciously, and not her looks.
maliiiiiiin 1 year ago
am I the only one thinking that Lolita brought everything that happened to her on herself? i mean, she was one precocious little girl with actually no conscious (sp?), she's bratty, selfish and spitful, at leastin this version. I always thought of her as a kind of victim, but now I see her as a kind of villian.
akissy 1 year ago 11
@akissy haha I tend to think thats how most girls are. They play the victom even though they brought the problems on themselves.
HipHopHatesRap 1 year ago
@HipHopHatesRap Now, that was stupid. First of it-s spelled victim, and second, if you think most of the girls play victim event hough they brought the problems on themselves you're way too wrong in the head, mister. Some girls ARE victims, many girls don't bring on themselves a drunk father, a wife beater, an abusive boyfriend, nor a rapist or stalker.
akissy 1 year ago
@akissy I'm not backing down on my statement. At some point in their lives both men and women put themselves in bad positions and end up getting hurt. Difference is, most women break out the "I'm a victim" card...most men don't. Like the saying goes "Take it like a man." Now, I'm not stupid! I know women...at no fault of their own...get victimized all the time but I'm talking about those women. I'm talking about girls like Lolita.....
HipHopHatesRap 1 year ago
@HipHopHatesRap that's what you would love to believe. but men break out the "She brought it on herself" card alot , you know? And if you're not generalizing, then don't say most girls. Because girls like Lolita, believe it or not, are not the mayority.
akissy 1 year ago
@akissy Well I don't believe it because I see it day in and day out. Your experiences must be different than mine. You can only speak for what you've seen and I can only speak for what I've seen but most girls that I've run into play victims. I'm 21 so I can only speak about women around my age and younger and I think all girls that age use the victim card. Oh and in my orginal statement I never said anything about rape. You brought that word up not me
HipHopHatesRap 1 year ago
@HipHopHatesRap and where am I commenting on rape again? o.o And you must be running into some pretty shallow girls, time to think of a changein scenery, no? I'm going to be 23, and I can tell you that I've been lucky and smart enough to seek people who are mature, or try to be. The moment I detect a drama queen, even though it's hard, I just don't get near them. Maybe you should do the same thing?
akissy 1 year ago
@akissy "Some girls ARE victims, many girls don't bring on themselves a drunk father, a wife beater, an abusive boyfriend, nor a rapist or stalker." Those are your words and it looks like you did bring up rape. And shallow women...not my thing. I like good, level headed girls but that doesn't mean I don't have idiotic male and female friends. Everybody has shallow people in their lives and I seriously doubt you're any different than the rest of us.
HipHopHatesRap 1 year ago
@HipHopHatesRap I used to have shallow friends when I was in junior high and high school. I don't try to get on a high horse here, but i think I can recognize shallow people from good level-headed ones. But yeah, there's shallow people who are nice, but their shallowness gerts overshadowed by thet niceness and, well... they turn out not to be that shallow in the end. XD
akissy 1 year ago
@HipHopHatesRap and I said that because you were generalizing and saying most girls play the victim card just because. I think there was a gap in communication.
akissy 1 year ago
@akissy ....Girls that play with fire, get burned, but pretend like they're so little, fragile, and innocent. Like there's no way little old me could have done that to myself.
HipHopHatesRap 1 year ago
@HipHopHatesRap Because every girl plays with fire. you really are baised. did someone make you take all the blame?
akissy 1 year ago
@akissy That's a very controversial question that's been debated many times. It's like asking, "Do kids who bully bring it on themselves when the victims shoot or maim them badly?" Not to long ago a teenage girl was prostituting herself out of her home for extra cash. Some men got violent with her, raped and beat her. Did she bring it on herself? Some would say, "No! She may have done wrong, but she didn't deserve to be hurt." But isn't it human nature that pain is the greatest lesson?
sumoni 1 year ago
@sumoni Yes, pain is the best teacher many times... I suppose that we would never know the answer to such questions. XDD
akissy 1 year ago
@akissy Well it's common for littlle girls to act flirty with older guys, the point is as an adult you are expected to know better then to diddle young teenage girls.. Basically before a certain age you cannot give consent, and for a man of Humberts age to be attracted to a young immature girl like that is something he should have controlled.
afghi420 1 year ago
@akissy ok your crazy.. he could have stopped himself anytime...
keyodi 1 year ago
@keyodi Not really. When you are sick like that your impulses are hard to control. Mum's studying physchology, she told me that some things cannot be controlled on your own, that's why people take meds and get therapy and that sort of thing, and since paedophilia is not an accepted practice it can turn into an obsessive-compulsive disorder, and I think Humbert had that. o.o Plus he was obsessed with Lolita, it's hard to quench an obsession.
akissy 1 year ago
@akissy It's a bit more complex than that. The themes explored here are really weakness and corruption in both characters. Lolita is weak and in love with Quilty yet corrupt; realizing that unable to fend for herself in an adult world she is willing to use sexual favors to get what she wants from older men. Humbert is a weak man and is drawn in by the fact that Lolita will allow him to shape her into his ultimate sexual fantasy for a price; by giving away his resources as an adult.
thecyberpunk 1 year ago
@thecyberpunk I think I've read that comment somewhere else.
And I have to take back the comment on paedophilia. It's obviously not paedophilia.
akissy 1 year ago
@akissy I don't think she's either victim or villain. She is however precocious and very flirtatious. She is very aware of her sex appeal and knows the kind of effect she has on men, not unlike most women--especially girls of her age. I remember when I was her age, I suddenly became very much aware of my sexuality. The difference is she doesn't really control or hide her sexuality because she has no outlet and no discipline. Humbert perpetuates her behaviour by not staying away from her.
TinaB1990 1 year ago
@akissy "she came onto me" isn't that always the pedophile's excuse? if you've read the book you should realize that it's told from the perspective of a murderer who likes little girls-- not exactly your most reliable narrator. We don't know anything about the real Lolita, except that she cried every night after she thought Humbert was asleep.
VivaLaVivienne 1 year ago
@VivaLaVivienne Actually, that's incorrect. Pedophiles who turn into child molesters (not all pedophiles act on their desires) act very different from how Humbert Humbert acted. He was traumatized by the loss of his childhood sweetheart. His emotional intelligence got stagnated at the age of 12-14 more or less. He transfered all of repressed desire into a girl who looked a lot like his sweetheart, he became obsessed with the only image he had of love. It's not justification, though.
akissy 1 year ago
When he was younger he fell in love with a girl, and she died. So he sort of transfers his lust onto Lolita who has similar features. Almost everyone does it subconsciously, but we look for those characteristic in older men or women, not in underage girls( thank goodness).
DH1986 1 year ago 5
Sue Lyon was hotter.
WhatSayestThou 1 year ago
if your grandmother was born between 1940-1960 chances are she was married between 14-16. It was not against the law if it was you would not be born. Don't let the media manipulate your thoughts and ideas of right and wrong
yappertrap 1 year ago 2
@yappertrap Today's society smuggles teens more. Plus, older women are jealous on teen girls who are attractive to men and age of consent laws are the perfect ocasion to get them out of the picture.
lillybellebutterfly1 1 year ago 2
@yappertrap Of course, there are also good intentioned people who consider that sexual revolution has created a lustier society, normalising sexual liberalism and perversions. That's why it was considered that teen girls/boys are in greater danger than decades ago to choose the wrong path and age of consent laws are tougher and tougher.
lillybellebutterfly1 1 year ago 3
@yappertrap I am not a sociologist or a psycologist. This is just my humble opinion. Don't take it as gospel truth.
lillybellebutterfly1 1 year ago
@yappertrap right & wrong is all in the imagination.
DennistheGreat483 1 year ago
that`s hot
wakamachulet 1 year ago
this movie is HOT!
HEBisreal 1 year ago 2