This thing is truly majestic, and to named The White Swan?! Freaking profound! But I'd like to call the reality of that scene into question, would just two escorts really be enough to protect a bomber that size and an accompanying AWACS plane?!.........
I hate how people are always saying that that Russia just copied the B1 Bomber when they built the TU-160. If you consider the facts that a plane capable of these speeds, this big and heavy. Variable swept wings are almost a must. Pretty much all large aircraft have their engines located in some type of nacelle. Throw in aerodynamics and an aircraft of this type will naturally take a shape like the B1 and TU-160. This besides TU-160 is nearly twice the size, speed, and takeoff weight.
Αναρωτιέμαι τι συνέπειες θα έχει για εμάς τους Έλληνες και για ολόκληρη την περιοχή η ρίψη 40 τόνων πυρηνικών...Μη χαίρεστε παιδιά...Δεν είναι παίξε-γέλασε αυτά τα πράγματα.....
@MarriedtoaPineapple Training dog fight is never focused on who wins, all participants will eventually gets to have "kill" the aggressor at least once, and follow the procedure of the Top Gun / Red Flag rules of engagement. So there is no winning or losing in it.
Don't get me wrong, I love Russian aircraft...but Not Su-30...my favorite is Mig-25! Foxbat is an aircraft that is still ahead of its time, and Mig-31 is a pussycat compare to Mig-25! I love the rawness and ingenius concept behind Mig-25. Second favorite Russian aircraft would be Su-25, third would be IL-10. Su-27 (and its family) is glamorous turkeys...
@looxgood How can you not like the Su-30...lol .....seems like you like everything with the number 25 in it lol jk.....I can see why you would like the Mig-25 though.
Why most country that have Migs and Sukhois are afraid or too intimidated fighting with US based jet fighters? I am not saying that Russian are inferior technologically but what I am saying is that countries like Syria, Irag(Saddam), and others are too scared to face US fighters like the Israeli AF. Just wondering. It seems to me that those country that have Russian planes are scared to fight F-15,F16,F18. With the exception of Russia.
@GreenPanther13 do you have to call me an idiot just to make your point? I am asking politely. i dont blame you if your mother calls you idiot all day. i am not just used to that because my parents treat me well when i was a little. if you were abused when you were a little, and now you've grown up, then maybe its time for you to stop doing the "idiot calling" to others you do not know. It just shows how dark and sad your mentality is. I pity you.
@GreenPanther13 you are crazy man. You do not even know me. I am not an american. I am a filipino. You see, you are really a dumb thinker. you are like a fire and forget missile when you talk. im sure a lot of people dislikes you because of your behavior towards other people. When I check fighter jets in youtube, i do not look at them as american or russian. I see them as wonder works of art and science. You need to go to see a psychiatrist, you are paranoid.
@joab302016 Yeah, blah blah blah... I am paranoid. I need to psychiatrist. I am a dumb thinker. Most people dislike me because of my behaviour... Hahahahahahaha....
All these because I said you are an idiot who disses russian technology? How old are u, jackass? Do you have a girlfriend or you still playing your dick? Hahahahaha, what to expect from you... You even said that those who have russian aircrafts are afraid to fight F-16s.... Hahahahaha.... Kid...
@joab302016 Peace man. I having a good time getting amazed how Russian Technologies have evolved. I am in now way trying to say a shit about Russian aircraft. I think they are as good as their western counterpart. The Mig-29 is very beautiful and the SU-30's are very impressive. Having said that I hope you will stop barking at me. I am married with two kids. I do not play with my dick. Enjoy your life and stop bullying people you do not know.
Beautiful video! Respect to Russian military and the music is perfect.
P.S. To those mocking the F-15, note it is the most successful jet fighter to have been in service, TO DATE. It's virtually undefeated. (I am not american)
Of course this is a Channel by a Serbian with a high population of Eastern European and Red Russian homer Communist propaganda. Hellbent on the same destruction of Israel as the rest of the Arab World. As Prophesied in the Bible and in Revelation too.
Why so many USite's like yourself seem to be practically allergic to giving Russia Credit for her own Technological & Engineering Achievements (of which the "TU-160" is a shining Example) i have never understood.
I admire the Russians, in part because unlike us Brit's they still have a Strong Aerospace Sector (as compared we lost almost all of our Areospace Industry in the Sweeping Cuts of 1957-67).
Air National Guard is more or less a part of state military service - most of the pilots have a regular job, and they fly usually in weekends. There is also an ROTC option that you can pursue, I had a collegue who was in college and she flew for the air national guard, then sent off to active duty. She finished her tour and have returned to civ but still flies with the a.n.g. in oregon. And yes there are many scholarship programs available as well - so check it out with ng office.
Yes, moe, I flew with RCAF for 2 years. Trained with CF-18 but ended up with F-16 for USAF liason program. Now I'm doing consulting services for Boeing and LM. Su-30 when I saw it was impressive, but I'd say F-16 does not come any short, in fact, in dogfight, most of USAF pilots would love go head to head with any russian planes and would win.
@looxgood our su 27's in training fights completely decimated f 15's in 1992 i observed a training flight between an su 27 an f15 our pilot karibasov was abit trigger happy and not only took out the f15 but also took out the observing f18 i also witnessed a training fight between an f16 and a mig 29 and the f16 was taken out although both the f15 and f16 did put up a very good fight i must say
@killman369547 Dude, the first time Russian Su-27 or 30 ever met with F-15 was in 2002 during the Airshow in Alaska. No mock dogfight ever took place between the Russian and the US pilots ever! The first dog fight between Su-30 and F-15 was in 2002 when the US pilot flew Indian Su-30 against Louisiana Air National Guard F-15A during COPE.
@looxgood Wrong...Alexander Harchevsky managed to persuade us back in 1992 to have a duel against the over confident F-15 pilot. Not only did he own the Eagle in his Flanker but got carried away and even splashed the filming F-18. Look it up yourself if you'd like. But it did happen. He is the same pilot who gave Vladimir Putin a VIP flight to Chechnya in 2000. He is a hero in Russia and a very successful test pilot.
@strizhi@looxgood Alexander Harchevsky's claim is a myth, down right a lie. There was no mock up dogfight back in 1992 due to Russia's poor economic state - they did not have fuel to do such a stunt. BTW, no US pilots were ever authorized to have mock up "Personal challenges" by Harchevsky's claim - what actually happend was this. In 1992 Paris air show, Harchevsky put one of F-15 in his HUD during the formation flight during the air show, not during the so-called "Dog fight".
@looxgood And I'll bet your source "SsnMurphy"....geez can it get any better?? He's a US Air Force pilot who claims to know what transpired in summer of 1992 even though he wasn't there and supposedly its classified. Sounds to me like someone can't stand losing so instead makes excuses as to how the Russians lied. I would take a Major Generals word any day over some fly jock who wasn't even there. Incredible what you allow to filter your mind. It's your word against his not mine.
@looxgood Word of advice...do some real research instead of some half made web page. I have high hopes for our educational reforms but sometimes I wonder.
Back on track though, here's where it comes down to - Su-27 and up far supersede F-15...but won't get a chance to prove themselves because they're in the hands of half trained and poorly equipped nations. Even MiG-29 could take on an F-15 but were splashed like fly's over Iraqi skies - not the plane, the pilots make the difference.
@strizhi I wouldn't say the Mig-29 & Su-27 are better aircraft than the F-15. The F-15 is a mission oriented aircraft whereas the Russian aircraft are primarily air combat aircraft. The air to ground capabilities of Russian planes is very poor. The best that they can carry are unguided bombs & rockets. While an F-15 (particularly the Strike Eagle) is one of the best ground attack planes in existence. Plus, the Mig-29 has terrible range. They might be more maneuverable but they aren't better.
@strizhi Su-27S, Su-27P, Su-27SM, Mig-29S, & even some Mig-29 variants designated for ground attack roles have poor performance due to a lack of pylons & limited payload. Not to mention limited combat radius. I cannot say there is a true multi-role Russian fighter. At least an aircraft that is good at air to air engagements & air to ground attacks at the same time. Even the Su-35 won't have excellent air to ground capabilities.
@franknbeans4761 Well I did some research and I found your statement contradictory to facts. During the 2nd campaign in Chechnya all Su-27 fleet from previous years have been upgraded to a fighter bomber role as there was no need for a fighter against a nonexistent threat. They were modified with precision laser guided bombs and destroyed every target without a single loss. F-15's are falling apart here in the states and having issues in Japan which just grounded their Eagle fleet.
@strizhi I am not so sure about the entire Su-27 fleet being upgraded to the fighter bomber role, I still saw a lot of aircraft in Chechnya still using unguided rockets & bombs as their primary armament.
As for jamming equipment, all countries use it. If anything, I am not so confident with Russian jamming. They couldn't even jam their own equipment in Georgia & lost 3 Su-25's & a Tu-22M to the Buk.
@strizhi As for the F-15's falling apart, that isn't true (especially the Strike Eagles). One aircraft had many cracks in his wings a few years ago & the wings did in fact break, but you can still build new wings & air frames & rework the aircraft (which the US did). And relating to jamming equipment, the F-35's will all have jamming pods built into the aircraft. It is also hard to say whether the T-50 will be better than the F-22. The F-22 will for sure have more strike capabilities.
@franknb Also heads up Su-27 flankers will be replaced by the last upgrade Su-35BM keeping the Su-30MK2 for all purpose aircraft whether it be for strictly dogfighting or tactical bomb insertion. They will also be armed with counter-electronics as well as radar jamming equipment. Sukhoi with simplicity and complexity all combined into one is simply unmatched. Su-27 forced the creation of 5th gen F-22..PAK FA is the big boy on the block now. All planes are good no doubt and will perform superbly.
@franknbeans4761 And one more thing - MiG-29 are all being upgraded to SMT and even an added similar MiG-35 will become standard. For durability and reliance I will always side with Sukhoi and MiG makers...we used to have the edge with tech...now I doubt that is an ace in our hands. Fascinating what has transpired just in the few years alone. But don't forget...in the end its the pilot not the plane...though a good combination to have.
@strizhi There are no orders for the Mig-35. But I would say that durability & reliance are important, but it shouldn't really be stressed any more.
But like you said, it is all about pilot training. I am surprised Russia does not do any large scale exercises like Red Flag. The best that they have is at Lipetski air base, which is more comparable to the American TOP GUN school, but nothing on size as Red Flag.
@franknbeans4761 The worst thing to do is underestimate anyone. You leave yourself open and with ego and pride over logic gives way to greater chance for a greater fall. Russian pilots made do with what they had and have always trained to be in situations unfavorable to them whether it be numerically or technologically. They have found ways simple ways with manueverability to confuse our radars and deflect our long range missiles and have perfected their dogfighting and bombing skills.
I do want to point out that all pilots train outnumbered. Particularly American/NATO ones due to the Cold War doctrine being carried over from being outnumbered by the USSR.
As for confusing radars, not so much anymore. That only worked with Doppler radar, where Russian planes would create a "clutter" effect with maneuvers. US aircraft now have AESA radar systems making it all but impossible. Especially with AWACS support.
@franknbeans4761 Well said sir...it has been good to carry out a very informative discussion. You're absolutely right in Russia's overall defensive might. Perhaps it is best this way so as not to be perceived aggressive in nature. Though only ill fate awaits those who undertake measures to undermine Russia through military means. Whats really great is now the cooperation between Russia and western counterparts giving way to newer line of thought. All nations can learn from each other :)
@strizhi Ha ha just trying to spread some knowledge. That link I sent you really helped educate myself on the Russian military. It was a great read. That poster also made a number of other great threads.
The Russian military is well tailored to their historic aspects in terms of defense. And it is a good system, especially when considering it's size. The only fault it might have is it having to spread out it's forces due to it's size & geographic bottle necks in terms of oceanic access points.
@strizhi But we will just have to wait & see. Russia is upgrading it's Su-27 fleet, just upgraded it's Mig-31 fleet, will obtain the T-50, Su-35 series, & will upgrade it's Mig-29 series.
While the US will finish it's order of F-22's, finish it's order of Super Hornets, then start introducing the F-35, start sea trials with the X-47B in 2013, & is still flight testing the Boeing Phantom Ray. So it might just end up coming down to pilot training & tactics.
@franknbeans4761 First of all your lack of confidence in Russian radar jamming is like comparing apples to oranges. It's already an established fact they have the best air defense system in the world able to knock out B-2's nevermind what a Soviet relic in Serb hands managed to do to the Nighthawk. So I'm not surprised Georgia managed to down 3 in 2008 with a Russian BUK-M system (once again alot has changed since then). Also consider Georgia's losses and it all becomes clear.
@strizhi Well, I am not trying to say Russian jamming is terrible, but due to their aircraft losses in the 2008 War you have to at least have it come into question.
Russia does in fact have the best SAM system in the world. Here is a great site that documents it:
But it isn't perfect. The only SAM system capable of defeating stealth aircraft is the S-400. Otherwise the Pakistani HQ-9 would of downed the RQ-170 already
@franknbea Also you make it sound like Russia is stil stuck in the 90's with poor equipment and lack of funds for any air time for their pilots. If that is your view and that is what you sincerely believe then they're doing their job...keeping you unaware. But those of us who do keep a vigilant eye know for a fact they're increasing number of pilots and are flying and performing their duties on a routine now only seen in Soviet glory days. I don't know where you're getting your faulty info from.
@strizhi I do not think Russia is stuck in the 1990's at all. If you even do minimal research you can easily see that they are vastly modernizing their military in every aspect. But I do have to say that their military is defensive in nature. It relies on SAM's, interceptor aircraft, shorter range diesel submarines (Kilo Class), & large amounts of guided missile boats/corvettes. I do have a lot of credible sources & I am not trying to bash the Russian military.
@franknbeans4761 If only Russians would be accepted into Red Exercise's like every other nation participates we would really get a chance to see and dissect them. For now its all pure speculation and with past history both American and Russian pilots along with Germans, British and Israeli's are no doubt in the top 5.
French organizer thought Harchevsky's aircraft was having mechanical trouble since he was falling out of the formation. (Just 2 years earlier, Mig-29 crashed during demonstration in Le Bourget). So fire trucks and emergency crews were organized on the ground - which was kind of funny. So that is Harchevsky's claim of "Dog fight against US F-15". In 1993, Russian Knight almost did not make it to Paris Airshow because French bank threatned to possess SU-27 for RUssian national debt.
@looxgood Are you on real crack?? Or do you just like to make shit up as you go along. He's a Sukhoi test pilot...what the hell does random MiG-29 crash have to do with this? As far as I know we've had the worst, the most expensive and the most air crashes. What the French chose to do is their business and your little smirky sarcasm has failed to validate your point - if there was even one. 90's Russia is not "21st century Russia" nor "pre-Soviet empire". Hard times for Russia lasted a decade.
@looxgood And I would be careful dogging someone else's hero when considering our hero's like that NASA astronaut who drove 10,000 miles in diapers to get back at supposed love ring member - everytime you point a finger there are always at least three pointing back at you. Its ok to be prideful but not alright to be ignorant.
@HayabusaGrrrl Read my post carefully!! The first time they met was 2002! BTW, IAF pilots were NOT allowed to dogfight against F-15C of USAF. They were only allowed to go head to head against ANG from Louisiana.
@looxgood That is actually hard to say. Two Su-27's were bought by the US in 1995. Little is known about how they were used but either way could of been used for aggressor training.
@franknbeans4761 Yes, it was purchased from Ukraine - however, it was such a bad shape that FAA did not certify it for flight until 1998 (it was owned by Pride Aircraft) - and under the law, it was not compliant for any dog-fight or military exercise (that means they dont have good enuff spare parts for high-g manuevers). USAF has better alternative in simulating Su-27 & Mig-29 - which is F-16, which can duplicate all manuevers done by both Russian aircraft.
Yes, the F-16 is still very comparable in terms of performance & aircraft capabilities even though the US still conducted large amounts of training against German Mig-29's on top of it.
@ruiutomy1 Actually, SU-30's lost bad in that fight in 2002. They had to do it again with F-15's long range radar turned off into TWS mode, and be out numbered 4-to-2. Then IAF pilots claimed that they won the dog fight... true story.
A 50: Радиолокационная станция, работающая в сантиметровом диапазоне, способна обнаружить цель класса "истребитель", летящую на малой высоте на фоне земли на дальности 200-400 км, на большой высоте - 300-600 км. Морские цели обнаруживаются на удалении до 400 км...
Wer wurde in Europa Bombardiert? Und wer hat überhaupt so eine grausame Waffe wie ein "Nuklearsprengkopf" verdient???
Und das Beste ist: Der Pilot der SU 27 löst sich von dem Sitz bzw beugt sich nach vorne um an den Boardinstrumenten rumzuklimpern. Ist der Typ zu klein oder das Flugzeug zu lang???
PS: sogar an meinem Auto komme ich ohne Schwierigkeiten ans Radio dran!!! Und da wirken keine G- Kräfte auf mich.
@killman369547 The F-15 lost another battle with Russia’s Su-27 in the autumn of 2000, during the US-Japanese drills in the Pacific Ocean. Two Su-27 jets, covering the Su-24MP, conducted a sudden attack of the flagship of the US 7th fleet, Kitty Hawk. The US aircraft carrier would have been destroyed in real combat conditions
@PlaneAU if we like the name given to our aircraft than we accept it as the aircrafts standard nickname take the mig 29 fulcrom for one fulcrum is the standard name used to identify the plane
Господи, тухлая графика на кой хрен тут? Гимн приплел зачем-то... Ты показывай технику, а самоутверждайся. Неужели ты не понимаешь что всю твой СУПЕР-заставку народ тупо перематывает, ибо сделано УБОГО! Подумай, афтар...
What kind of fucked up video is this? Half of it is animated, and the sequence where the -160 pilots congratulate themselves after dropping the nuke is pretty fucking repulsive. While the Russian Air Force is a formidable power against banana republics and various 3rd world nations, it is a rusting, worn-out, second rate power compared to the US. That being said, the -160 is an awesome plane...
@beeroosterm Jealousy? HAH! These bombers are worthless. B-2 Spirit can sneak in undetected, drop 80,000 pounds of bombs/nukes/cruise missiles and be gone. The -160 will be blown up before it even has the chance to get close enough to launch her cruise missiles...
@RDHalmon Certainly not if you look for what purpose it was designed aircraft in the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation that there will be no doubt that this is true, then there may be true.
What a lovely aircraft. I have to say the Soviet design bureaus have designed some of my all-time favorite aircraft. This being one of them. I'm sure glad both ours and their leaders decided that it was best to talk to each other, rather than about each other.
e cel mai frumos avion din lume,din toate timpurile si dintre toate avioanele,indiferent din ce clasa ar fi ele.niciun alt avin nu il intrece ca linie si eleganta.
No way the KH-101 has a range of 5000 KM. It's made in the late 80's as a compeditor to the American AGM-86. The KH-55SM is the one which comes up to 3000 km with minimum load. It needs to be launched from a submarine. The ASM version does 2500km. They need to be in international airspace from that (except if they want to hit Alaska). F-22's will be there to shoot the TU-160 down asap. Or fighters will be scrambled from American bases in Japan. As you know the Americans are everyehere!
@TheVeenmeister but first the f22's have to deal with our su 35S or su 35 bm with its Tikhomirov NIIP N035 Irbis E 20 kiloWatt class steerable hybrid ESA radar the f22 can be picked up tracked and destroyed before it gets in weapons range it will appear on radar at 400km with a three meters squared rcs
They would be destroyed by patriot missiles with PDB-6 software. And if a ship is targeted. The goalkeeper will take the missile out in last resort So it's difficult without stealth. Aside that it is a beautiful plane.
@TheVeenmeister lol patriot missile shield is shit, low accuracy but high success rate duie to spray and prey tactics on scuds jeez can you defend yourself against a flock of birds or will you run out of missiles>?????
@TheVeenmeister Yeah...Keep on dreaming kid... Even if the SAM radars were able to spot it (they cant, it has anti-radar protection), the defence systems its got would easily protect it from every hostile rocket...
@GreenPanther13 You are right. The PDB-6 upgrade for detecting cruise missiles is not yet widely active. But tests on American made stealth cruise missiles are positive. So it obviously will detect Russian missiles too as they are not that advanced yet. The Americans invented stealth technology and where the first to design a radar to detect that stealth technology again. That is how the US defence system works. But better is to intercept those planes before they could launch.
@TheVeenmeister Yeah, yeah, no one holds a candle to the Americans when it comes to saying they "always" have some sytems or weapon that "easily" surpasses or destroys whatever might be thrown at them...just like the so-called Patriot Missile from a corrupt contactor named Raytheon, that got huge live advertising during the Gulf War in 1991 as a "wonder" weapon that destroyed Iraqi scuds...in reality that crap hit nearly nothing. Great battle record of many U.S. weapons.
@GreenPanther13 And the best is to prevent that weapons are used. And especially those weapons. If ICBM's, SLBM's, nuclear tiped cruise missiles are used in combat between the US, Russia, China, or another country, it will end the normal world as we know it, if we survive. The main thing you do, is living in underground bunkers for ages..
@TheVeenmeister Oh, yes. We all know what would happen if a nuclear war ever took place and no one ever wants a future like this. It wouldnt be that different from Fallout... BTW, I dont think the Russian missiles are not that adanced. On the contrary. Some parts of the russian military technology are more advanced than the US's...
Name song please ?
michelrr51 2 days ago
Is it just me or do certain parts of that video look like CGI??? 3:17 definately does
whitewingsrich 5 days ago
Comment removed
whitewingsrich 5 days ago
thats wat i call COOL ^^
animebutter 1 week ago
Amazing piece of machinery!
Judyiack 2 weeks ago
This thing is truly majestic, and to named The White Swan?! Freaking profound! But I'd like to call the reality of that scene into question, would just two escorts really be enough to protect a bomber that size and an accompanying AWACS plane?!.........
deeya 2 weeks ago
I hate how people are always saying that that Russia just copied the B1 Bomber when they built the TU-160. If you consider the facts that a plane capable of these speeds, this big and heavy. Variable swept wings are almost a must. Pretty much all large aircraft have their engines located in some type of nacelle. Throw in aerodynamics and an aircraft of this type will naturally take a shape like the B1 and TU-160. This besides TU-160 is nearly twice the size, speed, and takeoff weight.
fillopygeesi 2 weeks ago
ahhhh, the sound of victory
iNf3rNuSdI4bLuS1 3 weeks ago
W Russia.. /\/\ US
TheWhiteStig85 3 weeks ago
What a great nation Russia
sunearthmoonjupiter 3 weeks ago
Looks very similar to US's B1b bomber. I wonder who made the design first?
joab302016 1 month ago
Turks must begin to afraid!
Greetings from Greece!
MegaSeleukos 1 month ago
Greetings from all Hellenes!! we would like you to fuck some turkish asses with those aircrafts..
mitgiannis 1 month ago
Η τεχνολογική υπεροχή των Ρώσων στα οπλικά συστήματα, έναντι του υπολοίπου κόσμου είναι τουλάχιστον εντυπωσιακή.
Τους αξίζουν μεγάλα συγχαρητήρια για αυτό και μόνο το γεγονός.
giuzer 1 month ago
Αναρωτιέμαι τι συνέπειες θα έχει για εμάς τους Έλληνες και για ολόκληρη την περιοχή η ρίψη 40 τόνων πυρηνικών...Μη χαίρεστε παιδιά...Δεν είναι παίξε-γέλασε αυτά τα πράγματα.....
omerta10001 1 month ago
Goodbye Turkey xa xa
heerk 1 month ago
We love Russia all of us in Hellas.
leeroyalexandros1 1 month ago 44
nice video...greetings from greece-hellas.
zinopoulo 1 month ago 27
Russia the best in War absolutle brilhant
luizguilhermemsales 2 months ago
Fast and rush landing at 4:28
4damage 2 months ago
WHAT FILM IS THAT I WANT TO WATCH IT PLEASE REPLY !)
TheMickyGMan1 2 months ago
THE THE THE BEST BOMBER !!
TheMickyGMan1 2 months ago
@000sansan
Tu-160 was better. Biggest airbomber in the world.
Stemfortn 2 months ago
@000sansan
U're dumb as fuck. ya ass looks like niggers ass. so what? stupid ameriCUNT biatch!
Russia2010 3 months ago
@MarriedtoaPineapple Training dog fight is never focused on who wins, all participants will eventually gets to have "kill" the aggressor at least once, and follow the procedure of the Top Gun / Red Flag rules of engagement. So there is no winning or losing in it.
looxgood 3 months ago
Haha, nice use of Supreme Commander FA-soundtrack!
Favk21 3 months ago
Blackjack and whores. That's what it means for Bender :D
GiusAppuleiusDiocles 4 months ago
Don't get me wrong, I love Russian aircraft...but Not Su-30...my favorite is Mig-25! Foxbat is an aircraft that is still ahead of its time, and Mig-31 is a pussycat compare to Mig-25! I love the rawness and ingenius concept behind Mig-25. Second favorite Russian aircraft would be Su-25, third would be IL-10. Su-27 (and its family) is glamorous turkeys...
looxgood 4 months ago
@looxgood How can you not like the Su-30...lol .....seems like you like everything with the number 25 in it lol jk.....I can see why you would like the Mig-25 though.
kunalchanna 4 months ago
Why most country that have Migs and Sukhois are afraid or too intimidated fighting with US based jet fighters? I am not saying that Russian are inferior technologically but what I am saying is that countries like Syria, Irag(Saddam), and others are too scared to face US fighters like the Israeli AF. Just wondering. It seems to me that those country that have Russian planes are scared to fight F-15,F16,F18. With the exception of Russia.
joab302016 4 months ago
@joab302016 Maybe because you idiot, the Mig's in Syria and Iraq are dated to the 70's and 80's. Thats why. they are technologically outdated...
GreenPanther13 1 month ago
@GreenPanther13 do you have to call me an idiot just to make your point? I am asking politely. i dont blame you if your mother calls you idiot all day. i am not just used to that because my parents treat me well when i was a little. if you were abused when you were a little, and now you've grown up, then maybe its time for you to stop doing the "idiot calling" to others you do not know. It just shows how dark and sad your mentality is. I pity you.
joab302016 1 month ago
@joab302016 I called you an idiot because you are the typical yankee who thinks everything not american is deterior...
GreenPanther13 1 month ago
@GreenPanther13 you are crazy man. You do not even know me. I am not an american. I am a filipino. You see, you are really a dumb thinker. you are like a fire and forget missile when you talk. im sure a lot of people dislikes you because of your behavior towards other people. When I check fighter jets in youtube, i do not look at them as american or russian. I see them as wonder works of art and science. You need to go to see a psychiatrist, you are paranoid.
joab302016 1 month ago
Comment removed
GreenPanther13 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@joab302016 Yeah, blah blah blah... I am paranoid. I need to psychiatrist. I am a dumb thinker. Most people dislike me because of my behaviour... Hahahahahahaha....
All these because I said you are an idiot who disses russian technology? How old are u, jackass? Do you have a girlfriend or you still playing your dick? Hahahahaha, what to expect from you... You even said that those who have russian aircrafts are afraid to fight F-16s.... Hahahahaha.... Kid...
GreenPanther13 1 month ago
@joab302016 Peace man. I having a good time getting amazed how Russian Technologies have evolved. I am in now way trying to say a shit about Russian aircraft. I think they are as good as their western counterpart. The Mig-29 is very beautiful and the SU-30's are very impressive. Having said that I hope you will stop barking at me. I am married with two kids. I do not play with my dick. Enjoy your life and stop bullying people you do not know.
joab302016 1 month ago
Comment removed
joab302016 1 month ago
Beautiful video! Respect to Russian military and the music is perfect.
P.S. To those mocking the F-15, note it is the most successful jet fighter to have been in service, TO DATE. It's virtually undefeated. (I am not american)
Peace!
medjaiii 4 months ago
Enough with the patriotic comments. It's a fucking video about a fucking airplane.
If you need to complain, go to the Fox News forum or something.
thelastgameboy 4 months ago
AMAZING QUE ESTABILIDAD DE LOS AVIONES.
DevilCondori 5 months ago in playlist Más vídeos de SRBdevis2000
RUSIA FOREVER.
DevilCondori 5 months ago in playlist Más vídeos de SRBdevis2000 12
Of course this is a Channel by a Serbian with a high population of Eastern European and Red Russian homer Communist propaganda. Hellbent on the same destruction of Israel as the rest of the Arab World. As Prophesied in the Bible and in Revelation too.
BBQFanNo1 5 months ago
Is that Arnold Schwarzenegger @1:15?
uno22 6 months ago
hahahahah
knollik 6 months ago
davaaaaj russiooo tako treba
zoran3119 7 months ago
The best way to know which country is better in weapon Russia and America they need to fight each other in a war come on we are waiting
fared70 7 months ago
Hey who can tell me this movie name pls???
allelujah12341 8 months ago
@allelujah12341 what make's you think it's some movie
NosferatuAaacaado 7 months ago
@NosferatuAaacaado EEEHHH.........just i think so........
allelujah12341 7 months ago
One sick bomber
barthoedemaker 8 months ago
Another Impressive Video, keep up the Great Work "SRBdevis2000".
Out of Curiousity: What are the names of the Soundtracks
used for 0:44- 4:06 and for 4:07 to 4:45 ??
TSR1989FF 8 months ago
@MattB613 Well you would say that wouldn't you?
(as you're from "Over There").
Why so many USite's like yourself seem to be practically allergic to giving Russia Credit for her own Technological & Engineering Achievements (of which the "TU-160" is a shining Example) i have never understood.
I admire the Russians, in part because unlike us Brit's they still have a Strong Aerospace Sector (as compared we lost almost all of our Areospace Industry in the Sweeping Cuts of 1957-67).
TSR1989FF 8 months ago
Tu 160 is a beast plane lol
VAPOURIZE100 8 months ago
Dont mess whit the russians ....
BGSlopy 8 months ago
Hey cool a b1 knock off
StarsMarsRadio 9 months ago
Best Bomber !!!
reapersic 9 months ago
Zivela RUSSIA !!!! uraaaaaaaaaaa..
1968drale 9 months ago
amazing
DevilCondori 9 months ago
the colour scheme not so intimidatin,'white'?
banndell 10 months ago
@banndell White color reduces thermal signature and makes it really hard to see it while flying..
kakas10000 10 months ago
@banndell
you'll be plenty intimidated when a friggin angry white swan launches a nuclear cruise missile at you ;)
Suyamu 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Wrath of the RED ARMY...Long live Mother Russia !!
24514056 11 months ago
Wrath of the RED ARMY...Long live Mother Russia !!
24514056 11 months ago
Odličan clip, samo nisi li ga malo previše razvukao? Format mi nekako ne štima...
sabbathian 11 months ago
Koja je ovo pjesma koja pocne od 0:47
Merc963 11 months ago
Air National Guard is more or less a part of state military service - most of the pilots have a regular job, and they fly usually in weekends. There is also an ROTC option that you can pursue, I had a collegue who was in college and she flew for the air national guard, then sent off to active duty. She finished her tour and have returned to civ but still flies with the a.n.g. in oregon. And yes there are many scholarship programs available as well - so check it out with ng office.
looxgood 11 months ago
Prejebeno i muzika i sve!
Merc963 11 months ago
Yes, moe, I flew with RCAF for 2 years. Trained with CF-18 but ended up with F-16 for USAF liason program. Now I'm doing consulting services for Boeing and LM. Su-30 when I saw it was impressive, but I'd say F-16 does not come any short, in fact, in dogfight, most of USAF pilots would love go head to head with any russian planes and would win.
looxgood 1 year ago
@looxgood Bullshit...
Zukhov1945 11 months ago
@looxgood our su 27's in training fights completely decimated f 15's in 1992 i observed a training flight between an su 27 an f15 our pilot karibasov was abit trigger happy and not only took out the f15 but also took out the observing f18 i also witnessed a training fight between an f16 and a mig 29 and the f16 was taken out although both the f15 and f16 did put up a very good fight i must say
killman369547 9 months ago
@killman369547 Dude, the first time Russian Su-27 or 30 ever met with F-15 was in 2002 during the Airshow in Alaska. No mock dogfight ever took place between the Russian and the US pilots ever! The first dog fight between Su-30 and F-15 was in 2002 when the US pilot flew Indian Su-30 against Louisiana Air National Guard F-15A during COPE.
looxgood 9 months ago 12
@looxgood Wrong...Alexander Harchevsky managed to persuade us back in 1992 to have a duel against the over confident F-15 pilot. Not only did he own the Eagle in his Flanker but got carried away and even splashed the filming F-18. Look it up yourself if you'd like. But it did happen. He is the same pilot who gave Vladimir Putin a VIP flight to Chechnya in 2000. He is a hero in Russia and a very successful test pilot.
strizhi 6 months ago
@strizhi @looxgood Alexander Harchevsky's claim is a myth, down right a lie. There was no mock up dogfight back in 1992 due to Russia's poor economic state - they did not have fuel to do such a stunt. BTW, no US pilots were ever authorized to have mock up "Personal challenges" by Harchevsky's claim - what actually happend was this. In 1992 Paris air show, Harchevsky put one of F-15 in his HUD during the formation flight during the air show, not during the so-called "Dog fight".
looxgood 6 months ago
@looxgood And I'll bet your source "SsnMurphy"....geez can it get any better?? He's a US Air Force pilot who claims to know what transpired in summer of 1992 even though he wasn't there and supposedly its classified. Sounds to me like someone can't stand losing so instead makes excuses as to how the Russians lied. I would take a Major Generals word any day over some fly jock who wasn't even there. Incredible what you allow to filter your mind. It's your word against his not mine.
strizhi 6 months ago
@looxgood Word of advice...do some real research instead of some half made web page. I have high hopes for our educational reforms but sometimes I wonder.
Back on track though, here's where it comes down to - Su-27 and up far supersede F-15...but won't get a chance to prove themselves because they're in the hands of half trained and poorly equipped nations. Even MiG-29 could take on an F-15 but were splashed like fly's over Iraqi skies - not the plane, the pilots make the difference.
strizhi 6 months ago
@strizhi I wouldn't say the Mig-29 & Su-27 are better aircraft than the F-15. The F-15 is a mission oriented aircraft whereas the Russian aircraft are primarily air combat aircraft. The air to ground capabilities of Russian planes is very poor. The best that they can carry are unguided bombs & rockets. While an F-15 (particularly the Strike Eagle) is one of the best ground attack planes in existence. Plus, the Mig-29 has terrible range. They might be more maneuverable but they aren't better.
franknbeans4761 4 months ago
@franknbeans4761 Which version of MiG-29 and Su-27 are you referring to??
strizhi 4 months ago
@strizhi Su-27S, Su-27P, Su-27SM, Mig-29S, & even some Mig-29 variants designated for ground attack roles have poor performance due to a lack of pylons & limited payload. Not to mention limited combat radius. I cannot say there is a true multi-role Russian fighter. At least an aircraft that is good at air to air engagements & air to ground attacks at the same time. Even the Su-35 won't have excellent air to ground capabilities.
franknbeans4761 4 months ago
@franknbeans4761 Well I did some research and I found your statement contradictory to facts. During the 2nd campaign in Chechnya all Su-27 fleet from previous years have been upgraded to a fighter bomber role as there was no need for a fighter against a nonexistent threat. They were modified with precision laser guided bombs and destroyed every target without a single loss. F-15's are falling apart here in the states and having issues in Japan which just grounded their Eagle fleet.
strizhi 4 months ago
@strizhi I am not so sure about the entire Su-27 fleet being upgraded to the fighter bomber role, I still saw a lot of aircraft in Chechnya still using unguided rockets & bombs as their primary armament.
As for jamming equipment, all countries use it. If anything, I am not so confident with Russian jamming. They couldn't even jam their own equipment in Georgia & lost 3 Su-25's & a Tu-22M to the Buk.
franknbeans4761 4 months ago
@strizhi As for the F-15's falling apart, that isn't true (especially the Strike Eagles). One aircraft had many cracks in his wings a few years ago & the wings did in fact break, but you can still build new wings & air frames & rework the aircraft (which the US did). And relating to jamming equipment, the F-35's will all have jamming pods built into the aircraft. It is also hard to say whether the T-50 will be better than the F-22. The F-22 will for sure have more strike capabilities.
franknbeans4761 4 months ago
@franknb Also heads up Su-27 flankers will be replaced by the last upgrade Su-35BM keeping the Su-30MK2 for all purpose aircraft whether it be for strictly dogfighting or tactical bomb insertion. They will also be armed with counter-electronics as well as radar jamming equipment. Sukhoi with simplicity and complexity all combined into one is simply unmatched. Su-27 forced the creation of 5th gen F-22..PAK FA is the big boy on the block now. All planes are good no doubt and will perform superbly.
strizhi 4 months ago
@franknbeans4761 And one more thing - MiG-29 are all being upgraded to SMT and even an added similar MiG-35 will become standard. For durability and reliance I will always side with Sukhoi and MiG makers...we used to have the edge with tech...now I doubt that is an ace in our hands. Fascinating what has transpired just in the few years alone. But don't forget...in the end its the pilot not the plane...though a good combination to have.
strizhi 4 months ago
@strizhi There are no orders for the Mig-35. But I would say that durability & reliance are important, but it shouldn't really be stressed any more.
But like you said, it is all about pilot training. I am surprised Russia does not do any large scale exercises like Red Flag. The best that they have is at Lipetski air base, which is more comparable to the American TOP GUN school, but nothing on size as Red Flag.
franknbeans4761 4 months ago
@franknbeans4761 The worst thing to do is underestimate anyone. You leave yourself open and with ego and pride over logic gives way to greater chance for a greater fall. Russian pilots made do with what they had and have always trained to be in situations unfavorable to them whether it be numerically or technologically. They have found ways simple ways with manueverability to confuse our radars and deflect our long range missiles and have perfected their dogfighting and bombing skills.
strizhi 4 months ago
@strizhi I am not underestimating Russia at all.
I do want to point out that all pilots train outnumbered. Particularly American/NATO ones due to the Cold War doctrine being carried over from being outnumbered by the USSR.
As for confusing radars, not so much anymore. That only worked with Doppler radar, where Russian planes would create a "clutter" effect with maneuvers. US aircraft now have AESA radar systems making it all but impossible. Especially with AWACS support.
franknbeans4761 4 months ago
@franknbeans4761 Well said sir...it has been good to carry out a very informative discussion. You're absolutely right in Russia's overall defensive might. Perhaps it is best this way so as not to be perceived aggressive in nature. Though only ill fate awaits those who undertake measures to undermine Russia through military means. Whats really great is now the cooperation between Russia and western counterparts giving way to newer line of thought. All nations can learn from each other :)
strizhi 4 months ago
@strizhi Ha ha just trying to spread some knowledge. That link I sent you really helped educate myself on the Russian military. It was a great read. That poster also made a number of other great threads.
The Russian military is well tailored to their historic aspects in terms of defense. And it is a good system, especially when considering it's size. The only fault it might have is it having to spread out it's forces due to it's size & geographic bottle necks in terms of oceanic access points.
franknbeans4761 4 months ago
@franknbeans4761 I owe you a beer LOL
strizhi 4 months ago
@strizhi But we will just have to wait & see. Russia is upgrading it's Su-27 fleet, just upgraded it's Mig-31 fleet, will obtain the T-50, Su-35 series, & will upgrade it's Mig-29 series.
While the US will finish it's order of F-22's, finish it's order of Super Hornets, then start introducing the F-35, start sea trials with the X-47B in 2013, & is still flight testing the Boeing Phantom Ray. So it might just end up coming down to pilot training & tactics.
franknbeans4761 4 months ago
@franknbeans4761 First of all your lack of confidence in Russian radar jamming is like comparing apples to oranges. It's already an established fact they have the best air defense system in the world able to knock out B-2's nevermind what a Soviet relic in Serb hands managed to do to the Nighthawk. So I'm not surprised Georgia managed to down 3 in 2008 with a Russian BUK-M system (once again alot has changed since then). Also consider Georgia's losses and it all becomes clear.
strizhi 4 months ago
@strizhi Well, I am not trying to say Russian jamming is terrible, but due to their aircraft losses in the 2008 War you have to at least have it come into question.
Russia does in fact have the best SAM system in the world. Here is a great site that documents it:
militaryphotos . net/forums/showthread . php?175769-Defending-Mother-Russia
But it isn't perfect. The only SAM system capable of defeating stealth aircraft is the S-400. Otherwise the Pakistani HQ-9 would of downed the RQ-170 already
franknbeans4761 4 months ago
@franknbea Also you make it sound like Russia is stil stuck in the 90's with poor equipment and lack of funds for any air time for their pilots. If that is your view and that is what you sincerely believe then they're doing their job...keeping you unaware. But those of us who do keep a vigilant eye know for a fact they're increasing number of pilots and are flying and performing their duties on a routine now only seen in Soviet glory days. I don't know where you're getting your faulty info from.
strizhi 4 months ago
@strizhi I do not think Russia is stuck in the 1990's at all. If you even do minimal research you can easily see that they are vastly modernizing their military in every aspect. But I do have to say that their military is defensive in nature. It relies on SAM's, interceptor aircraft, shorter range diesel submarines (Kilo Class), & large amounts of guided missile boats/corvettes. I do have a lot of credible sources & I am not trying to bash the Russian military.
franknbeans4761 4 months ago
@franknbeans4761 If only Russians would be accepted into Red Exercise's like every other nation participates we would really get a chance to see and dissect them. For now its all pure speculation and with past history both American and Russian pilots along with Germans, British and Israeli's are no doubt in the top 5.
strizhi 4 months ago
French organizer thought Harchevsky's aircraft was having mechanical trouble since he was falling out of the formation. (Just 2 years earlier, Mig-29 crashed during demonstration in Le Bourget). So fire trucks and emergency crews were organized on the ground - which was kind of funny. So that is Harchevsky's claim of "Dog fight against US F-15". In 1993, Russian Knight almost did not make it to Paris Airshow because French bank threatned to possess SU-27 for RUssian national debt.
looxgood 6 months ago
@looxgood Are you on real crack?? Or do you just like to make shit up as you go along. He's a Sukhoi test pilot...what the hell does random MiG-29 crash have to do with this? As far as I know we've had the worst, the most expensive and the most air crashes. What the French chose to do is their business and your little smirky sarcasm has failed to validate your point - if there was even one. 90's Russia is not "21st century Russia" nor "pre-Soviet empire". Hard times for Russia lasted a decade.
strizhi 6 months ago
@looxgood And I would be careful dogging someone else's hero when considering our hero's like that NASA astronaut who drove 10,000 miles in diapers to get back at supposed love ring member - everytime you point a finger there are always at least three pointing back at you. Its ok to be prideful but not alright to be ignorant.
strizhi 6 months ago
@looxgood That is incorrect. The Indian-Us RED FLAG exercises pitted SU-30MKI's against F-15's and F-16's of the US Air Force.
HayabusaGrrrl 5 months ago
@HayabusaGrrrl Read my post carefully!! The first time they met was 2002! BTW, IAF pilots were NOT allowed to dogfight against F-15C of USAF. They were only allowed to go head to head against ANG from Louisiana.
looxgood 4 months ago
@looxgood That is actually hard to say. Two Su-27's were bought by the US in 1995. Little is known about how they were used but either way could of been used for aggressor training.
franknbeans4761 4 months ago
@franknbeans4761 Yes, it was purchased from Ukraine - however, it was such a bad shape that FAA did not certify it for flight until 1998 (it was owned by Pride Aircraft) - and under the law, it was not compliant for any dog-fight or military exercise (that means they dont have good enuff spare parts for high-g manuevers). USAF has better alternative in simulating Su-27 & Mig-29 - which is F-16, which can duplicate all manuevers done by both Russian aircraft.
looxgood 4 months ago
@looxgood Oh wow I didn't know that, thank you.
Yes, the F-16 is still very comparable in terms of performance & aircraft capabilities even though the US still conducted large amounts of training against German Mig-29's on top of it.
But either way thanks for the knowledge.
franknbeans4761 4 months ago
@looxgood 1992. Virginia.
BitnikGr 4 months ago
@looxgood And the su-30 won that fight!!!
Peace.
ruiutomy1 4 months ago
@ruiutomy1 Actually, SU-30's lost bad in that fight in 2002. They had to do it again with F-15's long range radar turned off into TWS mode, and be out numbered 4-to-2. Then IAF pilots claimed that they won the dog fight... true story.
looxgood 4 months ago
@looxgood Okay. Thank you for explanation.
Peace.
ruiutomy1 4 months ago
@looxgood hallo
11DOGLOVE 3 months ago
11DOGLOVE
Also, k.A. ob mich einer versteht? ist auch egal.
das Video an sich ist nicht schlecht gemacht, man sieht was von der Soviet. Technik...
es kommen mir aber einige Fragen auf zum Zusammenhang???
ein Supersonic TU 160 over Mach 3 startet mit einer Eskorte? ok die 2 SU, wenn es um die Ecke geht.
aber ein IL 76/78 A50 startet gleichzeitig mit dem Bomber?
11DOGLOVE 3 months ago
@11DOGLOVE Vielleicht wegen Frühwarn-Radar, falls ihnen wer in die Quere kommt? Wer weiß. Seltsames Machwerk jedenfalls, der Film...
BeerBarney 2 months ago
A 50: Радиолокационная станция, работающая в сантиметровом диапазоне, способна обнаружить цель класса "истребитель", летящую на малой высоте на фоне земли на дальности 200-400 км, на большой высоте - 300-600 км. Морские цели обнаруживаются на удалении до 400 км...
практическая дальность 5000 км
11DOGLOVE 3 months ago 3
Wer wurde in Europa Bombardiert? Und wer hat überhaupt so eine grausame Waffe wie ein "Nuklearsprengkopf" verdient???
Und das Beste ist: Der Pilot der SU 27 löst sich von dem Sitz bzw beugt sich nach vorne um an den Boardinstrumenten rumzuklimpern. Ist der Typ zu klein oder das Flugzeug zu lang???
PS: sogar an meinem Auto komme ich ohne Schwierigkeiten ans Radio dran!!! Und da wirken keine G- Kräfte auf mich.
11DOGLOVE 3 months ago
@killman369547 The F-15 lost another battle with Russia’s Su-27 in the autumn of 2000, during the US-Japanese drills in the Pacific Ocean. Two Su-27 jets, covering the Su-24MP, conducted a sudden attack of the flagship of the US 7th fleet, Kitty Hawk. The US aircraft carrier would have been destroyed in real combat conditions
Zbyszkoz 9 months ago
@Zbyszkoz wella loss to the su 27 was expected the su 27 was designed from the ground up to be better than the f15
killman369547 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Why can`t anyone actually put vid of Tu 180 without dick music. All that hard work ruined.
vorn29 1 year ago
Why can`t anyone actually put vid of Tu 180 without dick music. All tht hard work ruined.
vorn29 1 year ago
concorde's family strikes back
eurostar131 1 year ago
Usa calles it black jack cos they are jelous!!!!!!!
TheMickyGMan1 1 year ago
@TheMickyGMan1 UK actually makes Russian weapon names because British consider them awesome and Americans are jealous of them :D
999cheetos999 1 year ago
@999cheetos999
What the heck are you saying "makes Russian weapon names"?
Helpinglittlepeople 11 months ago
@Helpinglittlepeople ex NATO calls SU's by "Flanker". Even the name "Blackjack" was from NATO.....
999cheetos999 11 months ago
@999cheetos999
no they don't, they are not their official names… it's their nato nicknames.
PlaneAU 11 months ago
@PlaneAU I know, im just saying that NATO names them too....even most Russians appreciate/consider their NATO names
999cheetos999 11 months ago
@PlaneAU if we like the name given to our aircraft than we accept it as the aircrafts standard nickname take the mig 29 fulcrom for one fulcrum is the standard name used to identify the plane
killman369547 9 months ago
@TheMickyGMan1
No were jeolous of you and Ireland!!
Helpinglittlepeople 11 months ago
@Helpinglittlepeople why
TheMickyGMan1 11 months ago
Господи, тухлая графика на кой хрен тут? Гимн приплел зачем-то... Ты показывай технику, а самоутверждайся. Неужели ты не понимаешь что всю твой СУПЕР-заставку народ тупо перематывает, ибо сделано УБОГО! Подумай, афтар...
sandrew79 1 year ago
Thats a pretty sweet IL-76 AWACS.
duke269 1 year ago
What kind of fucked up video is this? Half of it is animated, and the sequence where the -160 pilots congratulate themselves after dropping the nuke is pretty fucking repulsive. While the Russian Air Force is a formidable power against banana republics and various 3rd world nations, it is a rusting, worn-out, second rate power compared to the US. That being said, the -160 is an awesome plane...
beeroosterm 1 year ago
@beeroosterm I sense Jealousy
massivesovietunion 1 year ago
@beeroosterm Jealousy? HAH! These bombers are worthless. B-2 Spirit can sneak in undetected, drop 80,000 pounds of bombs/nukes/cruise missiles and be gone. The -160 will be blown up before it even has the chance to get close enough to launch her cruise missiles...
beeroosterm 1 year ago
sweet russian awacs
killman369547 1 year ago
@AK107 only russian SAMS i believe are capable of this range but those ones are limited order stocks for russia and some close allies like china lol
Spartan9567 1 year ago
A very nice production :)
evilcatpillow 1 year ago
In Soviet Russia...
Aceofspeed 1 year ago
@Aceofspeed American moron.
IRUSIpanzermaster 1 year ago
да будет мир во всем мире
m0r0zko 1 year ago
love the shot of the pilot @ 3:00. propoganda ?
RDHalmon 1 year ago
@RDHalmon Certainly not if you look for what purpose it was designed aircraft in the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation that there will be no doubt that this is true, then there may be true.
m0r0zko 1 year ago
What a lovely aircraft. I have to say the Soviet design bureaus have designed some of my all-time favorite aircraft. This being one of them. I'm sure glad both ours and their leaders decided that it was best to talk to each other, rather than about each other.
hallis1 1 year ago
.... who the fuck did they nuke at 3:40.?
lol
keil911 1 year ago
@keil911 Looks like an old mineshaft.
beeroosterm 1 year ago
e cel mai frumos avion din lume,din toate timpurile si dintre toate avioanele,indiferent din ce clasa ar fi ele.niciun alt avin nu il intrece ca linie si eleganta.
marco14978 1 year ago
@alexvasilenko14
who told u that she collapsed?
GhostsLeader 1 year ago
@alexvasilenko14 You can never take the pride away!
ludgidia123 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
what is the song name in 4:08 and end in 4:39
????
DESSAR138 1 year ago
No way the KH-101 has a range of 5000 KM. It's made in the late 80's as a compeditor to the American AGM-86. The KH-55SM is the one which comes up to 3000 km with minimum load. It needs to be launched from a submarine. The ASM version does 2500km. They need to be in international airspace from that (except if they want to hit Alaska). F-22's will be there to shoot the TU-160 down asap. Or fighters will be scrambled from American bases in Japan. As you know the Americans are everyehere!
TheVeenmeister 1 year ago
@TheVeenmeister but first the f22's have to deal with our su 35S or su 35 bm with its Tikhomirov NIIP N035 Irbis E 20 kiloWatt class steerable hybrid ESA radar the f22 can be picked up tracked and destroyed before it gets in weapons range it will appear on radar at 400km with a three meters squared rcs
killman369547 9 months ago
They would be destroyed by patriot missiles with PDB-6 software. And if a ship is targeted. The goalkeeper will take the missile out in last resort So it's difficult without stealth. Aside that it is a beautiful plane.
TheVeenmeister 1 year ago
@TheVeenmeister
what would be destroyed, the blackjack at standoff range or the cruise missiles?
yuri60014 1 year ago
@TheVeenmeister lol patriot missile shield is shit, low accuracy but high success rate duie to spray and prey tactics on scuds jeez can you defend yourself against a flock of birds or will you run out of missiles>?????
Spartan9567 1 year ago
what is the song name in 4:08 and end in 4:39
DESSAR138 1 year ago
@DESSAR138 Globus - Preliator
Belanchik 1 year ago
In real life they wou;d not come that far... An AAM or SAM would destroy them easily.
TheVeenmeister 1 year ago
@TheVeenmeister
what about the b-1b?
yuri60014 1 year ago
@TheVeenmeister Yeah...Keep on dreaming kid... Even if the SAM radars were able to spot it (they cant, it has anti-radar protection), the defence systems its got would easily protect it from every hostile rocket...
GreenPanther13 1 month ago
@GreenPanther13 You are right. The PDB-6 upgrade for detecting cruise missiles is not yet widely active. But tests on American made stealth cruise missiles are positive. So it obviously will detect Russian missiles too as they are not that advanced yet. The Americans invented stealth technology and where the first to design a radar to detect that stealth technology again. That is how the US defence system works. But better is to intercept those planes before they could launch.
TheVeenmeister 1 month ago
@TheVeenmeister Yeah, yeah, no one holds a candle to the Americans when it comes to saying they "always" have some sytems or weapon that "easily" surpasses or destroys whatever might be thrown at them...just like the so-called Patriot Missile from a corrupt contactor named Raytheon, that got huge live advertising during the Gulf War in 1991 as a "wonder" weapon that destroyed Iraqi scuds...in reality that crap hit nearly nothing. Great battle record of many U.S. weapons.
vonkaunaz 1 month ago
@GreenPanther13 And the best is to prevent that weapons are used. And especially those weapons. If ICBM's, SLBM's, nuclear tiped cruise missiles are used in combat between the US, Russia, China, or another country, it will end the normal world as we know it, if we survive. The main thing you do, is living in underground bunkers for ages..
TheVeenmeister 1 month ago
@TheVeenmeister Oh, yes. We all know what would happen if a nuclear war ever took place and no one ever wants a future like this. It wouldnt be that different from Fallout... BTW, I dont think the Russian missiles are not that adanced. On the contrary. Some parts of the russian military technology are more advanced than the US's...
GreenPanther13 1 month ago
@alexvasilenko14 Never will, as long as Putin is around.
nucleartactician 1 year ago
How bout a longer intro next time?
Sabrehockeylw29 1 year ago
@alexvasilenko14 Go to Moskow, you see in every courner the Red Star, The Red Star lif in us Hard for ever"!
19834883 1 year ago
Is that....putins voice.... :)? Or i have problems with my ears :D
nedeljko031 1 year ago
I love seeing all the Russian bombers and fighters, they're so much more interesting than the US ones!
samrammstein13 1 year ago 23
@samrammstein13 that's a load of bull
MattB613 8 months ago